TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

righthandoftyr Archive

View 1 post and 9 comments by righthandoftyr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

righthandoftyr/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:47 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

No worries. I'd like to say that I myself have never been anything but eloquent, but I'd be lying.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 08:00 PM
6

I think the best thing that you could do (being one of the 'true' feminists) is to make a point of differentiating between the two. Don't let the bad sorts hide under the umbrella of reasonable feminism. Goes both ways, MRA's need to make a point of calling out misogyny and not permitting it to masquerade as Men's Rights, I'm not just picking on women here. I think this is what salient_punt was clumsily trying to say, to make a stand against the radicals that are trying to co-opt feminism. And t…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:03 PM
5

That depends. If it's a big chain store, send a letter (not an e-mail, an actual letter) to the corporate office. In chain stores the store manager has no say-so in what gets sent to them to stock. All that is handled by corporate buyers. The store gets a stocking planagram and a truckload of goods. The store manager doesn't choose what goods they get, or even where they put them on the shelves. He just gets instructions from above to carry out. It's not his fault and he doesn't have the power t…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 01:56 PM
1

So these highly unspecific musters that aren't specifically to do with rape just happened to be part of a package that very specifically targeted rape? From the little detail the article did give, it seemed that the musters are a new thing that didn't happen before the new regulations. They don't get to whitewash it just by attaching a disclaimer to it.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:23 PM
1

Yes. Although you can go ahead and answer it you really want to. Obviously it's wrong to intrude on people lives just to see if they might be committing a crime, just because they belong to some group that is perceived as being likely to be perpetrators of such crimes. "Checking up" on black men would be wrong because we'd be presuming guilt for a hypothetical crime they might be out committing and requiring them to prove their innocence. Police can only have the authority to come to the house a…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:52 PM
9

There are also suddenly mandatory musters in the middle of the night to ensure that students are really trying to sleep rather than do something else. How would it look if the police came to the homes of black men in the middle of the night and made them wake up to come out and prove that they are really at home asleep and not out robbing a liquor store? Really though, I'll grant you that the whole article is light on details and heavy on opinion.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:04 PM
1

MRA = Men's Rights Activist
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:16 PM
2

Of the men that go to court, only some are found guilty. Why are the ones found to be not guilty not counted with the 'falsely accused'. Some might be actually guilty and just got away with it, but all of them? Even if you hold that the two guys at the bottom are that portion that were truely innocent, then you have only 1 aquittal out of 11 being a proper aquittal.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 01:16 AM
1

And thus one of the tenets of our legal system is 'innocent until proven guilty'. Surely there are some who went to trial and got away with it, but it's not sensible to say that "Even though the best judgement of a court of law is that they are innocent, we random infographic makers know the truth that they're really guilty after all."
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter