And yet the reason he killed himself is because he wasn’t trans to begin with, which makes it a biased point of evidence, if you could even use it as evidence to begin with
The same increase graph that is mentioned in arguments like this happened when being left handed was destigmtised, essentially when something is de stigmatised people Will act how they have always been but been to afraid to show it
One’s self view could very easily be determined by the DNA affecting their neurona, and since we can’t read DNA as a rhibsome would be it is arguably impossible for a human to measure
Sex isn’t, gender is, as it is impossible to define a woman in a way that includes every woman but excludes all non woman things, the uniting factor in cis women being women is their gender identitys. Why is it impossible for a ‘man’ to identify as a woman which they actually would be according to their gender
What evidence do you have to suggest that there is a chance of it being socially motivated? Otherwise your statement holds as much weight as “we can’t prove Abraham linvoldpn existed”
I do not believe gender is determined by stereotypes in the slightest, it is determined by ones gender identity which is inherently self described as their is no way to measuepre ones self view
Also can you please give to me the definition that you absolutely believe seperate women from all non women? Just so I am certain that I’m not arguing against someone else’s point
If by that you mean the increasing number of people transitioning, that same pattern happened when being left handed was de stigmatised and people began writing with their left hand, essentially as something is de stigmatised people will embrace what they truly are instead of faking what they aren’t (being cis or right handed)
Ok, do you at least acknowledge that the definition of woman has shifted over time from observable traits to what you believe to be the current definition in genes?
My point is there is no way to draw a hard line between any two things, just as it is impossible to determine when one colour begins and the other ends, with this there is no way to define what qualifies as which genitalia, which means the definition of genitalia is fundamentally flawed
Your definition of woman would not fit every single woman and that’s a fact you would have to accept unfortunately, there are quite a few videos on YouTube of people who explain it to a significantly better extent than me, I think there was someone namedvaush or something
See those definitions don’t work as it is possible for someone who would very clearly be defined as a woman socially can meet the definitions for both female and male simultaneously, also supposing these are the definitions for woman, how did people define woman during times before the discovery or even knowledge of these organs and/or cells?
Yes but the only unifying thing on those (excluding trans people) for the definition of women is gender which is inherently dictated within oneself, which is solely because it would be impossible to create a definition for every ‘thing’ that could be considered a woman but would exclude every ‘thing’ not classically considered a woman, so I would argue that trans women are equally women as much as ‘biological women’ are because of the impossibility of a a correct definition
Just to clarify you believe you can’t change your sex? I’m willing to explain the blief otherwise to you and you can choose wether or not to remain ignorant if you would like
Hitler also started the first anti smoking campaign, that doesn’t mean that the anti smoking canpaign is run by maxis, gender is real as is the negative effects of cigarettes
