TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

riley2048 Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by riley2048 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Hey man, white men are apparently 'overrepresented' everywhere. https://www.google.com/search?q=white+men+overrepresented&oq=white+men+overrepresented Seriously? You're going with a google search of whatever happens to come up to prove a point? Look, clearly you're an ideologue that isn't going to get past the problems of your own socioeconomic group. And I get that. There are clear problems that men face, and white men in particular are getting blamed for things that are more a problem of econo…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 03:57 AM
1

Explain how too many white men is a problem that needs to be fixed. Touchy, touchy. Guess there is a new entry in the victim Olympics. You seem to have a problem with the idea that violating constitutional and civil rights and state anti-discrimination laws is OK if you don't see the things you expect. Math doesn't lie. Or claim to be a victim. I think you should form a support group. Maybe hug it out.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:34 AM
2

I think it is reasonable to notice statistical differences, and attempt to explain them, and if their are problems, rectify them. Just as I think it is reasonable for men to be awarded equal custody of their children in a divorce, or split funds for suicide prevention that are gender specific to the 70-80% of total suicides committed by men, or split funds for abused spouses to include a statistically appropriate share for male victims. Just because there are people who are playing the victim Ol…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:15 AM
2

Well, duh. Over large populations, given consistent conditions, you'll get patterns in distribution of anything. You asked the stupid question...
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:37 PM
2

If your entire teaching staff is white in a field where there is significant representation in the available qualified possible hires that there is likely a bias in the hiring. It's more complicated than things should be colorblind. It's checking the actual outcome against the probable range of outcomes given availability. You can't say, African-Americans make up 13% of the population, therefore 13% of the positions should be filled by African-Americans. You'd have to look at the particular fiel…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:27 PM
9

Worst spokesman for advocating boy's only spaces ever. She kept trying to talk over him and answer (admittedly ambiguous) rhetorical questions, but he came off as a muddled loon. The simple fact is the woman was advocating for mixed gender and girls' only spaces, and the easy and effective argument would have been that there exists girls' only scouting, a (former) boys' only scouting, and if you'd like to form a mixed gender scouting group, go right ahead, but leave boys' only spaces alone unles…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 06:40 PM
10

The best way to predict future behavior is by looking at past behavior. A high number of sexual partners outside of a relationship is an indication that monogamy is highly valued. If a monogamous relationship is what you want in a marriage, then don't marry someone who sleeps around a lot. This goes for either gender. It's not slut shaming (or whatever the male term is -- fuck boi?). It's being selective.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:33 AM
5

No. I think it was because the teacher was a special education teacher. The difference is stated because raping a boy and raping a boy with special needs can be different degrees of wrong. Although, special needs could be anything from dyslexia to low intelligence and severe emotional problems, so unless you know details, the statement is meaningless.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:57 PM
3

Something doesn't make sense here. I went and checked the Minnesota Child Support Estimator, and if you make $1424 gross with between 45% and 50% custody, and no income imputed to her, your support should only be $188/month. And that's with a bullshit number like $3800/month in expenses. With a net salary of $1400 (so a gross of maybe $2100) you're still looking at $530/month. Even with less than 10% custody, you're obligation should only be $251/month. You need a lawyer. Something is seriously …
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:05 PM
1

What state are you in?
/r/MensRights22/12/17 03:56 PM
-1

Going to dissent here. He fucked up by talking when he shouldn't have. He could have said a million things that meant nothing and kept his job, e.g. "I can't comment for the company", "It's being investigated", etc. Instead he made a statement to someone he didn't know about the position of his company about a media sensitive subject during a time of heightened visibility. He didn't screw up for not firing the accused. He got fired for not keeping his mouth shut.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 03:00 PM
2

So, not necessary for arrest. Would they be necessary for conviction?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:11 AM
3

I think the question should be why those search warrants aren’t necessary to get the proof that he did harass her?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:43 AM
15

Look, if you have a "friend" that says something like "I'm sorry, but 100% of Jews are thieves" you'd have to go to HR. This is no different. By not reporting it, you are excusing it. You are telling her that this is okay. Hating people because of a broad category that they belong to is wrong.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 03:23 PM
9

People don't even listen to their own propaganda. It's about power. A successful agent in the entertainment business will have more power than a mid-level actor/celebrity. Regardless of gender. That's why Weinstein and Louie C.K. could behave like assholes, and so could whatever asshole groped Terry Crews felt like they could do this. They had the chokehold on their ability to generate income. Gender (or frankly ability to kick someone's ass) doesn't fucking matter.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:40 PM
7

I think he was being sarcastic and agreeing with your point. For the record, I’m sorry shitty things happened to you.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:47 PM
10

Except it is an attack on him personally. Look at what she said: "I have to do everything and I'm exhausted. And you, you go to work and don't need to worry of anything, that's easy for you." That's an attack, directed at him. It isn't about what she is feeling, it is attacking what he is (or isn't) doing. He feels attacked, because she attacked him. I get that it is an outburst of feelings, but she is awful at expressing herself and has no apparent empathy for anyone other than herself. I also …
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:23 PM
4

Score one for science!
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:50 AM
29

So...the emotional well being for me is a zero sum game, where if men have friendships that they feel are non-judgmental and provide the sort of emotional support that is (according to the article) in excess to those found in heterosexual romantic relationships is a loss for women? Doesn't that mean the behavior of women in these relationships (again, given the information in the article) is causing men harm -- lack of emotional support? Wouldn't the right course of action, if this is seen as a …
/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:18 PM
8

And we are at the point where when presented with evidence contrary to your beliefs, you call it false without providing one shred of evidence to support your claims. We're done here. My fault for feeding the troll.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:56 PM
11

Have a list. https://thoughtscapism.com/2015/04/10/myth-no-studies-compare-the-health-of-unvaccinated-and-vaccinated-people/ ..and you know, smallpox. Large scale study, that one. Vaccines work because of a principle called herd immunity. If a large percentage of the population is vaccinated, it protects those individuals that aren't because there isn't enough of an unprotected population to spread the disease. So if a few individuals don't get vaccinated, nothing happens. But there is a tipping…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:44 PM
392

Yes it is. File a Title IX complaint with your school.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 02:54 AM
2

It was made with a great script. No one minds a reboot if it's actually good....
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:42 PM
5

Of course it does. Look at the original post, and realize that this is a feminist that has 10K followers, and how she is behaving. It normalizes that behavior the same way that the alt-right normalized shitty bullshit conspiracy theories by leading the birther crusade. Extreme behavior in the service of a political ideology published and re-published through the media normalizes it. So she is an extreme example of feminism and Alex Jone/Breitbart is an extreme example of right wing behavior. Des…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:05 PM
1

No. Because she is a comedian and no one thinks it is seriously a threat. Stupid? Yes. A threat? No. Look, she fucked up. She did something because she thought outrage comedy was going to get her something, and it backfired. And CNN fired her because it was a public embarrassment. So Trump will use this to distract from his other (very real) problems and because he has been and always will be a media whore.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:39 PM
9

Liberals != Feminists. That said, they (feminists) ignore them because those issues don't matter to them. Nothing more complicated than that.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:52 PM
1

That's a big claim. And it might be correct, but there needs to be some evidence to back this up. Something more controlled than just having observed some kids choosing which toys to play with at a family gathering.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 04:06 PM
2

troll.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 03:14 PM
3

So... You make up statistics about 1 in 5 women being raped on college campuses. You repeat the lie over and over for a decade on as many media outlets as you can. And you're surprised by women having an overriding anxiety about being raped?? Color me shocked.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 03:56 AM
2

Two loving adoptive parents beats a single mother (or father) all other things being equal. Parenting is hard work, and two parents have it easier sharing the load than a single parent. Blood bonds don't matter so much here. If the child is placed with the adoptive family shortly after birth (remember, all other things being equal) both the parents and the child will bond to each other relatively quickly, and then the fact that the child is adopted becomes largely irrelevant to their day to day …
/r/MensRights22/04/17 07:56 PM

According to the article, the college is 71% white and 49% mail. So, about one third of the students are white men. Looks like appropriate representation to me.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:29 PM
6

Umm. Beyond the ridiculously sexist and racist motivations for the article, let's examine how that works. If you don't get men to voluntarily give up the vote, you have a military that is 85% male, with only 31% reporting a minority ethnicity (http://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2014-Demographics-Report.pdf), and a population where white male gun owners vastly outnumber female and minority gun owners (http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/12/section-3-gun-ownership-trends-and-d…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:23 PM
3

Traditionalism didn't fail in the west. It succeeded to a degree that had never been seen before. The late 20th century until now has been a world that is unprecedented in terms of reducing the amount of physical labor needed to keep civilization running. Fewer people are required to farm enough food to keep everyone fed, build enough builds, transport enough good, etc. Feminism is built on this. Less physical labor, fewer children necessary to replenish the physical workforce, smaller family si…
/r/MensRights06/04/17 06:09 PM
14

Men have the right not to put themselves in situations where they may appear to be compromised. In business and politics, everyone can be considered to be a potential adversary. It only makes sense to take precautions. Look at it this way: Pence would be an idiot to take a private meeting with a Russian banker right now, because regardless of what actually happens, accusations could be made by the other party. Inferences could be made by those not involved. Regardless of the fact that I think Pe…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:15 AM
1

Semantics. It's your choice of what you drink that matters...
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:23 PM
1

No, there isn't anything that can actually show that. You can say that everyone who lived past the age of being nursed probably drank water and then died, but it is possible for someone to drink only some liquid to sustain life. What the Obama administration said is true, but misleading. The Obama administration (probably) meant to address the earnings gap, which (if you want to address it at all) should concentrate on changing womens' choices. Things like that are said to get votes. The problem…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:12 PM
241

Because it fits a narrative to advance an agenda. This is politics -- one group trying to advance its interests over another.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:40 PM
0

So, wait...she asks for money, not promising anything on a dating site (which are known for bots and scams already) and people send her the money? This isn't a Men's Rights issue. This is just a tax on stupidity.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:29 PM
10

I don't know if it counts as stalking...did she actually come anywhere near him? Libel maybe, because she published lies that could damage his relationships with his fiance and others? I'm not sure there is law that covers this because it's a really different thing. Not that this isn't weird and disturbing, and clearly that woman has issues that need to be dealt with by a professional.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:22 PM
3

To me, the problem is not that there has been a gradual change in the meaning of a word -- take access as an example. Over the past half century is has gone from being exclusively a noun to being both a noun and a verb, and it has increased the expressiveness of the language. The problem is that the redefinition has been fast, and is done as a technique to win an argument rather than more clearly express thoughts and ideas. They re-frame the language to change the argument of the other party, ie…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 08:33 PM
3

This is an opinion. Take it for what it is worth. Because it is an attempt to redefine well known terms. Sex and gender refer to the genotype and phenotype of the individual. XX, XY and male and female. Those terms cover everyone that isn't suffering from a birth defect. Gender identity is a concept that was invented within the last 100 years to cover the individual expression of their gender, apart from their genotype and phenotype. Do they feel male or female. But rather than just say gender i…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:07 PM
1

Some valid points. Generally factually correct. His delivery will push people in the opposite direction. But this is TV news, right? All that matters is that he is entertaining when being an ass. Jill Filipovic, while stating some falsehoods as facts, was able to present herself as the grownup in the room, and would be more likely to persuade people.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:00 AM
2

Safe Haven laws allow women to simply drop the child off and terminate their parental responsibilities and financial obligations. In terms of issues, I think the safe haven laws are an easier argument than arguing for a financial abortion. Too much emotion and controversy surrounding termination of pregnancy.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 02:57 PM
2

Simply put, the focus of this is equality of outcome, rather than equality of opportunity. Rather than level the playing field so that everyone, regardless of gender has an equal opportunity to succeed, concentrating on the numbers of [engineers, computer scientists, CEOs, whatever] rather than the potential number of qualified candidates for the job allows the perception of discrimination to be inflated, and thus inflating the need for corrective action. So, rather than compare the number of ma…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:18 PM
15

She still put his name down as the father. That bears some responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:05 PM
5

I'm glad that what you want is equality for all. The problem with feminism (as practiced) is there is a power structure to it as a movement, and the wing of feminism that wants women to being treated like permanent victims is controlling the conversation. Check out this this talk by Christina Hoff Summers about the differences between equality feminists and intersectional feminists. It's not specifically about custody issues, but does provide insight into the mindset that feeds the kind of entit…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 09:29 PM
2

It doesn't surprise me that he is veering conservative. He is going to dance with the one that brought him to the dance. GOP congress, he'll champion GOP policies. His tax policy was always spot on GOP policy -- cut tax rates across the board, remove individual exemptions (largely benefiting at the middle class), drop capital gains taxes and drop inheritance taxes (largely benefiting the wealthy). I wouldn't be surprised if they went after the mortgage interest exemption in the next couple of ye…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 01:59 AM
0

Yeah, pretty much not a MR issue, but something pretty bad for the middle class as a whole. I think removing the head of household deduction might affect divorced men disproportionately, although I don't have any numbers to back that up. It might be addressed as a MR issue in that it seemed (again, no numbers to back it up) most people concerned with Men's Rights were pro-Trump (or at least anti-Clinton), and it should be clear that Trump's loyalties lie with the class he belongs to (those makin…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 12:59 AM
1

With the removal of personal exemptions, even if you don't pay much, it will still go up a couple of percentage points. Now, if you make over $250K, your tax bill should decrease substantially because the overall tax rate will be reduced, and the personal exemptions don't make up as large a portion of tax exemptions that are claimed. So, overall, a win for those making $250K or more a year. Like I said, it's not a surprise.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:05 PM
-1

Taxes are going to be raised on the middle class with the removal of personal exemptions that dwarf the explicit reduction. This should not be a surprise to anyone that read Trump's tax proposals before the election.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:02 PM
1

An IUD is less invasive than a vasectomy. The mother could certainly do that, and if she doesn't do that, why should she have the only decision that counts in the end? But that's not the issue. The issue is equality: both participants should have equal opportunities to end their involvement. Beyond that, the mother even has the opportunity to hide the pregnancy from the father, and then ask for support after the fact. One party is clearly working with an advantage in the situation. As I said, if…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 02:43 AM
1

If they both decide to have it, absolutely. However, one can terminate the pregnancy, without penalty, without informing the father, and without having the father have the option to have the child and raise it himself if she doesn't want to be a mother. After the birth, parenthood can be imposed on the father in a way that it is not imposed on the mother. Please bear in mind that I am all for a woman's right to choose. But the father should be informed of the pregnancy and given the option of no…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:59 PM
2

The woman has every right to insist that he use birth control, or she uses birth control. If she insists on this, and your co-worker forces himself on her, it's rape. Is he a rapist? If not, then the woman is complicit in the pregnancy. Yet she has a choice post conception, and the man does not. This is not to say that your co-worker isn't a piece of shit. By your account, he is, but he made the exact same choices in each pregnancy as the woman, yet has no rights where she does. And no, neither …
/r/MensRights04/09/16 02:40 PM
6

Thanks. I have it under control. Years of lies and threats and using the children as tools of manipulation have gotten me here, so I will get myself out. I have enough evidence to protect myself should any false claims be made, and I am sure the anxiety will decrease over time. I worry about other fathers who are having the legal system that is meant to protect their children being used against them because women are somehow more believable than men. I worry about my son, and what his world migh…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 07:16 PM

This is horrible. I cannot fully explain the weight that sits on my chest and restricts my breathing as I read this article, especially as a father who is recently divorced. I have 50/50 custody of custody of my children on the strength of documented behavior (her text messages/emails/her posted videos on the internet) on the part of my ex-wife, and the possible testimony of not only my family, but her's. And even then, she threatened me with minimal custody right up to the day of our mediation.…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 06:49 PM
6

As far a comic book fans go, this has more to do with the fact that a lot of these stories are just bad. I mean, look at some of the examples. Miles Morales as Spider-Man: It worked in the Ultimate universe when Peter Parker died. There was character development. The stories were well written, the character was well-received because the stories worked. No one really complains about this character, even when he moves to the main Marvel universe because the character is well done. Carol Danvers as…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 02:33 PM
20

This is a level of self-absorption that I can't even imagine. Not a thought for the young men being maimed and dying. Not a thought to the children that will grow up without fathers, parents who've lost sons, the loss of a generation that could change Syria for the better with work and innovation. Not a word about ways to stop the violence. To fix the problems, or at least move the conflict from blood to words. No. It's all about the loss to their social life and not getting to have a family, an…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:37 PM
84

It's an entitled attitude. The male guest was right in that there is a "a la carte" attitude towards equality, and the entitled attitude of the women seems like they want men to learn their place (hold the door and pay). It women want well defined traditional gender roles for men (men pay, hold doors, etc), then they need to support the well defined traditional gender roles for men. I don't have a problem with it either way...be equal and behave as such, or choose the traditional gender role. Ju…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:04 PM
14

Why in the world would you assume that biological mothers have more responsibility for bringing the child into the world aside from possessing the uterus? By that logic, since I am the primary breadwinner and pay the mortgage and the food bill (as well as providing 50% of childcare), I have more responsibility in raising them from birth to adulthood. Children need their fathers and the mothers (assuming they are competent parents) in equal measure. If the parents cannot stay together, it is in t…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 04:09 AM
39

I think the most widely used OS is probably ITRON, an embedded real time kernel. Regardless, Linux is one of the most important kernels to ever be developed, and the manner in which it is distributed (and the fact that it is at the heart of the modern internet) is one of the most interesting things that has happened as a social movement in computing. If it is correct that he is being targeted because there are groups that feel that he is personally hampering the movement of women into STEM field…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:43 PM
1

Twitter is, for better or worse, an echo chamber. You subscribe to people you know and they re-tweet people they know, and they are most likely to be people who [ sympathize with your position | take biased posts at face value | respond to what they think is going on, rather than to what is ]. Reddit, for better or worse, seems to me to be a latter day replacement for Usenet, in terms of groups and discussions. While not immune to the echo chamber, it does seem to be a bit more diverse in opinio…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter