TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

riley_byrd Archive

View 1 post and 36 comments by riley_byrd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Seems like she’s not actually cool with non-exclusivity. Could cause problems in the future
/r/askTRP12/03/21 03:47 AM
1

I mean, this guy has nothing. Which is why I’m unsure about why they married. What kind of a partner does an undeveloped man make? But also, why marry a guy who you don’t take his name? I mean I’d get it if they made up a name or made a cool mashup last name. But I mean the bar industry gets a lot of strange stories. (He’s a nice regular dude, albeit not one I view as a “man”)
/r/askTRP26/02/21 11:19 AM
-2

Ltr?
/r/askTRP26/02/21 11:06 AM
3

That’s kind of what I was thinking, there were already some yellow flags proceeding this observation
/r/askTRP26/02/21 03:57 AM
1

Absolutely true, it’s hilarious to see real-time.
/r/askTRP26/02/21 03:55 AM
1

In my experience, the guy that doesn’t agree with a woke girls beliefs is usually the one that ends up smashing. Even as a woman I’ve never been like “wow he likes everything I like, I like him more”, in fact it’s usually the opposite unless he’s just a himbo
/r/askTRP26/02/21 03:54 AM
2

I’m implying with enough trauma, they’d be into it. I believe you missed the dark humor
/r/askTRP08/02/21 01:39 PM
11

The level of trauma probably
/r/askTRP08/02/21 12:01 PM
3

Women think they’re being nice by saying things like that, or even “I’m just not sexual/interested in a relationship” but every time there’s some guy that sees their words and actions don’t match up, and it’s irritating. But it shouldn’t be surprising. Femininity is inherently chaotic
/r/askTRP08/02/21 11:57 AM
1

That’s more the 20-25 range...
/r/askTRP05/02/21 12:49 PM
1

Lol not necessarily, I know some super risky ladies that dress relatively modestly. I find more that girls covered in tattoos (bonus if they’re over a ton of self-harm scars) are super red flags
/r/askTRP04/02/21 11:38 PM
3

Idk if it’s just the shorts, you have to look at the whole package.
/r/askTRP04/02/21 11:23 PM
1

John Wick levels of determination detected
/r/askTRP13/01/21 09:18 AM
1

I agree with your decision. I’m basically living the trad-wife life and if I shirk my duties then it’s more than far to have a monetary punishment. Congrats in keeping your house in order. Cant let standards slip unless someone is ill, otherwise what’s the point of a partnership.
/r/askTRP13/01/21 09:14 AM
3

Nothing is free, you pay for it one way or another.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 10:51 PM
1

It isn’t, because I see a ton of hot girls charging under $10/mo for premium sexy content. Maybe they include micropayment but I doubt it. Charging like $50/mo could be ridiculous depending on what market you’re trying to be in. And if you’re an artist that’s not entirely true either, you can ask for a higher price to see where the limit is for your product. If you don’t and you make that you did negotiate poorly
/r/askTRP10/12/20 10:50 PM
2

It’s true. When standards slip that fucks up society.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:59 PM
1

Run. That girl is likely crazy af
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:47 PM
1

Oh yeah, I’d be into that. Lighthearted teasing but not rude, and it shows you noticed she’s looking hot but not blatantly
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:41 PM
1

She’ll probably have her own to raise anyway. You’re mad at an imaginary woman btw, so try not to carry that baggage into a relationship
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:37 PM
9

Good for you, but there are plenty of people that want the affection without all the other shit attached. And for some, you aren’t paying them for sex, you’re paying them so they’ll leave 😏 No shame in that, only simping.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:23 PM
17

Decriminalizing prostitution would be better for society. Safer for clients and providers. You’d have legal recourse for theft and they’d have better protection from violence. It’d also cut down on human trafficking and increase tax revenue. Ideally they’d be on healthcare so less disease spread. And prices are posted, not like girls going to dinner for a free meal I’d say that’d be a big win.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:21 PM
6

You get what you can negotiate, these girls are just bad at negotiating. That’s kind of why a lot of women in sex work don’t recommend getting into it willy-nilly.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:16 PM
2

Oh 100%. It’s just like rappers pretending they’ve got a bunch of money when really it’s just their advance that they’ve blown completely through. It’s kind of a joke in both industries, sex work and music
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:15 PM
1

Now depends on what you mean by “starlet”. Because the vast majority of those women aren’t making nearly enough money for that to be a full-time income, let alone “star power”. Low-value women aren’t a new concept, it’s true that some of them migrate into sex work but it’s not sex work specific. There are plenty of women that act in that stereo typical fashion that work regular 9-to-5 jobs that society is comfortable with them holding. That being said, there is also a history of low-value men (t…
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:14 PM
2

Oh my God dude how do you not have more like this is fucking gold ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:03 PM
1

This is great information, I feel like he would have more likes if this was broken down into paragraphs for easier reading.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 11:56 AM
0

If they’re gen Z they’re too young to fuck anyway 🤷🏽‍♀️
/r/askTRP10/12/20 11:39 AM
2

I think the last two are probably fine, but I’ve never heard of the first one being received well. By gays or straights
/r/askTRP10/12/20 07:05 AM
2

I don’t think women are incapable of love, but it definitely isn’t “unconditional” love, that’s usually only reserved for their children.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 07:03 AM
3

He just hadn’t heard of the 80/20 split. Where 80% of the lower end of men are competing for the lower 20% of women. Whereas the “upper” 80% of women are competing for the top 20% of men. Not to mention when those same lunatic women have a list of requirements for men pages long which ends up equaling out to them competing for the top 1% of men when they are in the mid-to-lower end of their 80%
/r/askTRP10/12/20 06:50 AM
2

It’s technically biological. Women are hypergamous, so just keep that in mind when dealing with them. It’s always across and up (unless she’s loony)
/r/askTRP10/12/20 06:46 AM
1

If less people would fuck “uggos” society wouldn’t complain so much about not wanting to date the results. Both genders need to not let their standards slip or well all look like Neanderthals again
/r/askTRP10/12/20 06:44 AM
1

Or just don’t date women with unresolved sexual trauma, abuse or relationship-wise.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 06:43 AM
13

Women are like cats, if you want to pet them too bad you never will. Just ignore them and it’s much easier. “If you wanna get ahead, leave em on read”
/r/askTRP10/12/20 06:42 AM
14

Firstly “mamas” leaps out as a no. Maybe it’s your word choice? Also your in your 20’s? Best advice is what you ended on. Just hit the gym and focus on improving yourself. Lots of girls are flakey and confusing so it’s not worth putting too much effort into them until you build yourself up a bit. I wish I’d taken that advice when I was thirsting after girls (even bisexuals can’t catch a break 🤷🏽‍♀️) Once you get a bit of status it’s like they can’t keep off ya. It’s wild af
/r/askTRP10/12/20 06:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter