TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rinja Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by rinja on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

"I am relieved that I have finally been vindicated from these slanderous, disgusting, and now proven false allegations in a federal court by a jury of eight respectful, conservative women," Francis said in a statement. You're probably right.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 02:50 AM
2

In the past, guys were exonerated from rape charges by text messages from the girl that: planned when and where to meet thanked the guy for a wonderful time EDIT: I guess other variations could be emails and voicemails that capture the girl's frame of mind.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 09:19 PM
1

Great, let me know how that works out for you. EDIT: Me personally, I think it takes great personal strength to know someone was unfaithful to you and purposely and intentionally choose reconciliation, moving beyond the pain. But if you see this is as a sign of weakness, so be it. I rather choose to do what my conscience dictates, rather than follow the disapproval of a stranger.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 06:50 AM
1

I always thought very highly of my ex-wife's father, for doing what he did. He is a good man. Yet it was this very act of being a "doormat" that made him think highly of his ex-father-in-law.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 05:31 PM
1

I'm sure he thinks he does.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 05:29 PM
1

What is it with Reddit users and their lack of reading comprehension? It's almost like they go out of their way to get outraged. If you take my comments in their proper context, it's basically saying I'm not telling/dictating/forcing anyone to do anything. What I am saying is to use your own damn mind and make a decision, based on the facts and details of the situation, that you can live with. Me personally, even though it goes against the hivemind of /r/mensrights, I may choose to voluntarily g…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 05:28 PM
0

Your entire post was one big straw man. I'd like to respond but there's nothing to respond to except your imaginary foes. I see. It's apparent you don't.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 11:25 AM
1

Nope, no one is forcing anyone to do anything. In a scenario like this, although people say leave and don't look back, I'm saying it's more complicated than a simple black-and-white answer. You follow your conscience and make a decision you won't regret when you get older. But remember karma's a bitch and the fast and easy decisions you make in your youth may come back and haunt you later.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 05:11 AM
0

There's a balance between enforcing our rights and deliberating yielding our rights for the good of others. What if men enforced their rights and walked away but it caused lasting physical or psychological damage to the child? If this was me, although I'd be terribly hurt, the humanity in me would whisper that I should consider putting up with the injustice and loss of income to protect an innocent. Now if this was a case where the mother had no problems taking care of the child and I knew the c…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 03:32 AM
3

There's nothing uncomfortable about it. As you get older, you grow in wisdom and maturity. What passed for a role model when you were younger doesn't quite cut it as you get older.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 11:27 PM
3

Although it wouldn't resolve current cases, having mandatory DNA testing at birth would fix this problem going forward. (I know there's going to be exceptional circumstances like surrogate mothers and sperm bank babies and there could be reasonable steps to mitigate them.)
/r/MensRights24/03/11 09:30 PM
1

I need more men like your ex-father-in-law in my life. I find that as I get older, I seem to meet less men of integrity and honor.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 09:25 PM
5

I read one where the father found out when the child was 12 years old. He sued to have his child support payment stopped. (I think he considered the paid child support a lost cause and didn't pursue to recover those.) The case was tied up in court for 6 years until the child turned 18. Automagically, after the child legally became an adult, the family courts agreed with him. I believe the idea was that it was better for the child to have support from a known source rather than to risk being with…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 09:17 PM
5

I noticed that all comments older than 5 minutes all have (at least) 1 downvote. Could it be someone read the article, didn't like the content, and came in and downvoted all the comments? Hmm . . . EDIT: Punctuation
/r/MensRights19/03/11 07:40 PM
0

we all just want equality With all due respect, (almost) nobody wants equality, we just want better for ourselves and our group/side. In other words, we're all selfish beings.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 10:36 PM
1

In something as infinitely complex as human development, 'probably' just doesn't cut it. There's far too many variable to predict. I'm afraid we really won't know until the entire drama is played out and we can view the results.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 08:14 PM
2

Kids with one parent tend to turn out much worse, but gay/lesbian couples raise kids just fine. It's too early to tell. You'll have to wait 25-40 years for kids of gay/lesbian couples to grow up, go through their normal life cycle, and see what the results are. So far, there's no meaningful number of children raised by gay/lesbian couples to properly survey or research.
/r/MensRights17/03/11 11:20 PM
6

According to her defense: Martin initially stuck to her story before pleading guilty. Jonathan Devlin, defending, said: ‘Drink clearly played a part. The state of her intoxication was commented on by the two men who had the misfortune to come across her.’ A ‘traumatic’ childhood incident may have contributed, he added. So the reasons for her actions were: She was drunk The men called her out on the fact she was drunk She may have had an traumatic childhood experience ??
/r/MensRights04/03/11 07:05 AM
2

We could see [women] prices go up 25-30% and men's premiums could fall by about 10%.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 11:59 PM
2

21 Foot Rule
/r/MensRights21/02/11 04:41 AM
3

The judge will understand that you can't afford much in child support. With all due respect, I wouldn't count on that. Sigh.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 07:55 PM
1

I took it to mean that in a case where a pregnant woman is being kicked in the stomach, if someone stepped in to stop this and they accidentally killed the attacker, the homicide would be justified.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 11:30 PM
1

Because you didn't include the next line in your quote: Probably because for [men] marriage involves sacrificing their most treasured possession -- a free-agent penis -- and for [women], it's the culmination of a princess fantasy so universal, it built Disneyland.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 11:11 PM
5

Sigh, they had to call someone to name the medieval code of knighthood that's associated with virtue, honor, and courtly love. I guess chivalry is really dead, LOL.
/r/seduction04/02/11 06:09 AM
1

"Why? Because California courts charged with interpreting California's statutory rape laws have recognized that "a minor . . . who voluntarily engages in sexual intercourse is not necessarily a victim of sexual abuse." I'm surprised that a judge would rule that way. If that's the case, what's to stop an older male who has sex with a willing minor female from escaping sexual abuse charges? EDIT: Clarification
/r/MensRights04/02/11 04:49 AM
5

I think it's a case where minors are deemed not have the mental faculty and emotional maturity to make decisions that have far-reaching consequences. So a minor cannot enter into a legally binding contract nor can they legally consent to having sex (no matter how much "they might have wanted it"). That's why it's called statutory rape rather than outright rape.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 04:45 AM
1

Which probably contributed to her lenient sentencing.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 06:31 PM
2

I had fun trying out random alt-xxxx combinations.
/r/MensRights24/01/11 08:40 PM
-3

consent to sex can be withdrawn any time I hate it when women withdraw consent mid-stroke or just prior to climax . . .
/r/MensRights20/01/11 04:52 AM
2

The complainant was an American who saw her work in a magazine, not in real life Sigh, Americans ruining the lives of the rest of the world . . .
/r/MensRights12/01/11 02:02 AM
2

So by implication, women are immature and irresponsible? LOL.
/r/MensRights17/10/10 02:42 AM
2

Hmm, if you felt that way, I wonder how many other teachers feel this way. I was already in favor of homeschooling and this adds one more reason to my personal list.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 09:52 AM
1

It's when a woman is drunk and doesn't want to have sex but the man still pushes her into sex which is rape. If a woman regrets sex with a man after a drunken night it is not rape even though she may claim it to be as a result of trying to save her reputation. The problem is that in legal situations, there's really no way to be 100% sure which is which. Unless there's external evidence like text messages or pictures/videos, all a judge and jury would have is the woman's testimony.
/r/MensRights14/10/10 03:18 AM
4

Holy smokes, mixing thermite into play doh for a moldable version. That's genius.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 10:04 PM
2

I know how you feel and I feel the same way sometimes. But one reason to avoid calling women "bitches" is that it tends to emotionally escalate a discussion. If your intention is to come to some type of agreement, it doesn't help when people get overly emotional. If your intention is to vent and rage, please sir, be my guest, =).
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:04 PM
0

You're a rather horrible person I bet if we look at your life and behavior more closely, we'd be able to say the same thing about you. Everyone's house has a little bit of glass somewhere and make it vulnerable to people throwing rocks.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 05:58 PM
2

Why, oh why is this sentiment so popular on reddit? Have you only ever met faux feminists? No True Scotsmen
/r/MensRights03/08/10 09:26 AM
7

Winning that lawsuit may be therapeutic for him, providing closure (in addition to a big, fat check).
/r/MensRights29/05/10 11:55 PM
18

Well, if he was going to commit suicide over false accusation, the least he could have done was take the lying woman with him.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 06:31 AM
3

A judge has WIDE latitude in deciding the details of any agreement. They can strike out parts of it as illegal or unenforceable, insert stipulations which they feel benefit and protect the child, tell the adults to go back and come back with another agreement, and more. The judge can do almost anything they want in their court. This situation happened because the judge decided that the agreement was good enough. Moron. Right back at ya'.
/r/MensRights24/05/10 07:35 PM
5

Right, because nothing proves someone is a moron like calling them a moron.
/r/MensRights24/05/10 07:20 PM
7

The couple divided their personal property, Joe Stacy was required to pay $240 a month in child support and she gave up claims to a Florida house that fell into foreclosure in December, according to court files. Joe Stacy was an oil-rig worker who expected a sum of money from a 2008 accident. He offered to share the settlement with Sloop, who insisted on full custody of the boy if the father didn't collect the money, but the judge ruled that condition was unenforceable. From the 2nd article on s…
/r/MensRights24/05/10 07:14 PM
4

The judge didn't make any decisions. That's what judges do: they make decisions. A judge that doesn't make decisions is a judge who's not doing their job.
/r/MensRights24/05/10 07:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter