TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ripple24 Archive

View 17 posts and 330 comments by ripple24 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1629

Newsripple24/r/MensRights30/03/15 07:06 PM
292

Edu./Occu.ripple24/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:22 PM
196

Edu./Occu.ripple24/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:56 PM
78

Legal Rightsripple24/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:34 PM
60

ripple24/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:18 AM
51

ripple24/r/MGTOW03/09/15 02:47 PM
41

ripple24/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 02:55 PM
34

ripple24/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:30 PM
32

Progressripple24/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:35 AM
30

Women 'R Famousripple24/r/MGTOW08/10/15 05:34 PM
29

ripple24/r/PussyPass12/12/14 11:48 PM
24

Legal Rightsripple24/r/MensRights20/08/15 06:13 PM
12

Edu./Occu.ripple24/r/MensRights21/09/15 04:51 PM
6

Activism/Supportripple24/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:53 AM
4

ripple24/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:19 AM
1

Action Op.ripple24/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:35 PM
0

ripple24/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:06 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The whole point is her cavalier attitude. Hillary being a feminist is a cynical political ploy. One that will likely lose her the election, considering that her "fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ing with men [is] at a mere 27 per­cent, while two-thirds view her un­fa­vor­ably." http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/81040/hillary-clintons-demographics-problem
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:35 AM
9

Did the 12 year old girl who was brutally raped, and whose rapist Hillary got off on a technicality, and then laughed about it, deserve to be believed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tor00iWUhDQ
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:42 PM
10

The Dartmouth incident is so outlandish that if a fiction writer had come up with it, I would call it unbelievable. 150 "student" BLM thugs storm a library, where actual students are studying for exams, and threaten, intimidate, curse at, corner and eventually chase out whites who are simply doing what college is ostensibly for. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJAuVQlLxD0 A few days later the Vice Provost affirms the administration's support for the "wonderful and peaceful protests". http://www.…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 03:22 AM
1

Yale...that place where a large percentage of the student body recently launched protests over the administration not providing a specific list of acceptable Halloween costumes. "Best humans" indeed.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 12:14 AM
2

We still have the First Amendment. A University is not the real world, as these people will soon discover.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 03:05 PM
9

Jackie Coakley's name is public and there's no reason it shouldn't be. She's not a victim. She is a serial liar and fraud whose actions created actual victims.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:57 PM
5

I’m a full-on rapist, you know. Africans, dyslexics, children, that sort of thing.
/r/MGTOW09/11/15 05:33 PM
6

There is no difference between [big] "banks" and "the government". They are literally the exact same entity. That's what the leftists don't understand. They think they can use government to crush the banks when in reality they are just empowering one big, corrupt institution. In short they're useful idiots. The only way to have a government that is not taken over by 'special interests' is to have one extremely limited in scope, e.g. libertarianism.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 11:26 PM
6

Too bad Maxim now has a feminist editor-in-chief. The corporate mass-media has spoken: men are no longer allowed to have entities that cater to them. Be sure to tune into ESPN for the latest Kardashian news.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 05:08 PM
2

Because I wasn't born into the super elite and didn't inherit $35 million from daddy? Funny how quick you are to defend a corrupt NYC liberal just because he says the right buzz words. Trump has a lot in common with Obama - high on ego but devoid of substance. Sorry, just speaking as an actual conservative, not someone who was a Democrat two years ago.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 08:54 PM
2

People don't think it will happen to them until it does. I've seen serious proposals to tax 401ks. "All that money is just sitting there and it hasn't even been taxed!" Politicians will do whatever they think they can get away with, and with the complicit mass media, that's a lot.
/r/MGTOW08/10/15 07:46 PM
15

She has taken the pandering to SJW/feminist types to a new level. From claiming that when men die in war, its the women who are the victims, to supporting college rape show-trials; if you're a man, you don't want to see her in the Oval Office.
/r/MGTOW08/10/15 07:27 PM
2

You're giving him too much credit. Let's not pretend he actually competes in the free-market. He uses those connections to get the government to utilize coercive force on his behalf. Even with the corruption, he often has failed in his businesses, which he refuses to take responsibility for, preferring instead to declare bankruptcy and screw over his creditors.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 06:52 PM
1

It is called crony capitalism. He advocates for and has benefited from the government forcefully taking a person's property and giving it to private developers. It is un-American at its core. The guy is a liberal. If he wasn't running for president on the GOP ticket he would be supporting Hillary Clinton, like he has done in the past.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 06:48 PM
21

Men don't want to vote for a horrible old shrew who hates them. Imagine that!
/r/MGTOW08/10/15 05:35 PM
2

Not at all. It is absurdly hyperbolic. By specific, we're talking about an individual or a group of individuals. Not 3.5 billion people comprising half of humanity. And by actionable we're talking something that is in the realm of possibility - which it obviously isn't.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:04 PM
1

Yeah but threats have to be specific and actionable in order to be illegal. At least in the United States. That's the way it should be. Of course other countries have much less tolerance for freedom of speech (unfortunately IMO).
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:32 PM
11

The government and federal reserve have created a welfare/warfare corporatist state where employers are terrified to create jobs because they have no idea what is coming next. How exactly is that "right wing"? That sounds like authoritarian central-planning to me. "Right wing", if these terms are to have any meaning whatsoever, implies limited government. Hint: The Nazis were not "right wing", despite what your public school brainwashing may have told you. They were fascist totalitarians who bel…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 03:14 PM
2

I remember reading that it originally had to do with hair loss/restoration. Pharmacology is weird.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 08:59 PM
8

Exactly. "Woman have it hard because their super unrealistic expectations, of having an extremely high-value man commit to them when they have little to nothing to offer, aren't often met." Cry me a river.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 08:35 PM
2

They say: "Woman shouldn't be prosecuted for false accusations because it would have a chilling effect on victims coming forward." They intentionally conflate false rape accusers with "victims". They pretend that a "he said/she said" situation, if it did not lead to a conviction, would lead to charges against the accuser. Never-mind that rape accusers are very rarely charged even when their accusations can be proven demonstrably false. Hell, the eventual police report repeatedly referred to UVA …
/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:08 PM
15

Not exactly. The problem is that they're only willing to date up. That they consider guys at their level unacceptable.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 05:21 PM
4

Supposedly unless you register with the site only positive reviews will be displayed. So I don't know why anyone would ever register with the site.
/r/MGTOW01/10/15 05:31 PM
1

I think its the second one. It is just not worth the risk of permanent brain damage. Not even close. I'm not going to have any kids, but if I did have a son, I wouldn't let him play football.
/r/MGTOW01/10/15 02:00 PM
6

When it comes down to it, he's a meathead. Sure, he engages in pseudo-intellectualism. But like you pointed out, 'when you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything'.
/r/MGTOW01/10/15 01:32 PM
1

I can see finding enjoyment in watching people at the top of their field compete against each other. But that is not how many sports fans are. They become obsessed with the team nearest to them as if that means anything. It is not like the players are usually from the local area or even country. I suppose it is just a proxy for the war-like behavior that has been endemic throughout human history.
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 06:41 PM
2

Hmmm...wonder why Dunham didn't ask Hillary about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tor00iWUhDQ I guess true feminists find the rape of 12-year-old girls funny? Poor Lena, her show is being canceled due to such piss-poor ratings that even the ideologically-driven HBO can't ignore it anymore. And now she's being forced to quit twitter because it is not a "safe space"! LOL http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/09/30/career-crash-rape-hoaxer-lena-dunham-announces-end-of-girls-flees-twitte…
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 06:19 PM
29

It could be worse for them. They could be like Germany, importing a million illiterate, fanatical Muslims welfare cases who will refuse to assimilate to the native culture. Basically Germany is done as a country.
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 05:52 PM
0

And I ask you to please have some respect for the many, many victims of the awful plague on humanity known as communism.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 05:46 PM
1

Please don't. Donald Trump is a fascist idiot. He is not a conservative. At best he is an opportunist. He supports the corporatist and surveillance state. The only candidate from either party promoting anything that might be considered traditional American values is Rand Paul.
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 05:42 PM
-2

"Why do we need 23 different kinds of deodorant when children a starving?" - actual quote from Sanders the ignoramus
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 05:38 PM
0

Marx failed to take into consideration this little thing called "human nature". His ideas directly lead to the death of over a hundred million people and the suffering of many more. So no, I do not take him seriously, nor do I believe anyone with even the faintest clue about the human condition and history could either.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 05:12 PM
6

It is even worse when it is being done in your name, such as how the U.S. government recently discharged a Green Beret for having the guts to interfere with the ongoing brutal rapes of an Afghan boy. http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/28/politics/green-beret-discharged-for-beating-alleged-child-rapist-speaks-out/ Apparently allowing child rape is now official U.S. policy. We wouldn't want to offend the scumbag Afghani warlords. Who are we to judge their "culture"? /s
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:54 PM
3

How about this guy who is about to be executed in Oklahoma for a murder he almost certainly did not commit? https://reason.com/blog/2015/09/30/oklahoma-moving-forward-with-execution-o
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:33 PM
2

Just look at the rash of NFL players who have suffered serious mental breakdowns. Some of them are even self-aware of it. Such as the guy who shot himself in the chest so that an autopsy could be done on his brain. And its not just concussions. Near concussions have the same devastating effect. One's brain is not meant to be rattled around inside one's skull. If I was in charge of the NFL, I would order that they go back to the rubber helmets from the '60s. Or none at all. These $1000 specialty-…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 08:02 AM
5

Yesterday at the U.N.: http://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQBhiu3UsAAyE_M.jpg LOL
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 07:26 AM
1

Agreed. MGTOW is just "bachelorhood [for the modern age]". The reasons aren't relevant to the definition. To the phenomenon, yes, but not the definition. The modern age part isn't even really necessary as it is of course implied. Anything more than that risks being overly restrictive. MGTOWs can and do lead a wide variety of lifestyles. What we have in common is that we are men who forgo committed relationships. No need to make it anymore complicated than that.
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 06:19 AM
1

You are not helping the bum out by giving him $20, you are only enabling him to continue his destructive lifestyle for that much longer. People can only help themselves. And the sooner they are forced to do so by circumstance, the better (for their own good).
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 05:57 AM
1

The thing is charity doesn't work. Sad to say but that's just human nature. Maybe it did at one point when communities were much more close knit and each individual situation was taken into consideration, by say, the local church. But now that it is institutionalized? Forget about it. There's 50 million people in the U.S. on food stamps, who have no qualms about it, and no incentive to get off of it. A few years ago even Bono admitted that charity doesn't work. Tens of billions to Africa over de…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 05:50 AM
13

I doubt Hillary or any Democrat will win. After two cycles of one party the electorate almost always swings to the other. Not that whoever the GOP puts up will be any good. The whole thing is just one big charade anyway.
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 04:46 AM
3

Don't just complain here about it. Call up the company HQ and express your indignation. Tell them if nothing changes you will no longer be shopping there. And that you will ask your friends and family to do the same. I mean, they probably won't care, but it can't hurt.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:43 AM
2

That was a different time. The press was much more deferential back then and, even though his affairs were widely known, it wasn't seen as something to be reported on. Then came Drudge.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 08:24 PM
7

Some employers will promote married men over non married men as they are "more responsible" and "less disruptive" because the have been vetted by a woman. And who is a better choice of a reliable provider then a woman Or because men with families to support are more likely to allow themselves to be worked to death over single men who can more easily walk away, and thus enjoy greater bargaining power.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 08:18 PM
20

Single Female Lawyer, Fighting for her client, Wearing sexy miniskirts, And being self-reliant.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 08:02 PM
7

Probably should specify urban firefighters. 69 percent of firefighters in the United States are volunteers.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 07:58 PM
1

It is a PITA for a woman to change her surname to her husbands following the wedding? Seems unlikely considering that it is standard operating procedure.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 05:54 PM
4

Monica was what was available. She worked at the White House in close confines with him. That's all it was. The POTUS is under constant scrutiny and can't exactly just go off on some dalliance somewhere. Nor could he have invited some high-end escort to the Oval Office unnoticed.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 04:08 PM
3

Good points. I mentioned above that it is probably that employers view it as a sign of "maturity", but the more cynical explanation is usually the correct one.
/r/MGTOW29/09/15 02:41 AM
1

Makes sense. To expand on my point, an academic on a tenured track has pretty much guaranteed career advancement. Whereas in the corporate world, promotions are more likely to go to the "family man" than not. I guess because it is viewed as a sign of maturity. Not that there is any real justification for that of course.
/r/MGTOW29/09/15 02:35 AM
1

In the U.S. Obama instituted the "White House Council on Woman and Girls". There is no opposite council (despite lobbying efforts http://whitehouseboysmen.org/)
/r/MGTOW29/09/15 01:59 AM
2

I guess my point is that it is not as fickle of a job environment compared to the private sector.
/r/MGTOW29/09/15 01:53 AM
4

You'd be surprised. There's a lot of unspoken social mores that determine how a person is treated personally and professionally.
/r/MGTOW29/09/15 01:24 AM
8

Yeah but academia isn't the real world, not even close - especially for tenured professors.
/r/MGTOW29/09/15 01:21 AM
1

One would think in a corporate environment they would look at a single, childless employee in a positive light. "Here's a guy who doesn't have a lot of distractions, who probably won't mind working late, who won't have to take days off to take Johnny to the doctor." But you're right. It doesn't work like that.
/r/MGTOW29/09/15 01:20 AM
4

I would've sent him to 1060 West Addison, Chicago, IL 60613
/r/MGTOW28/09/15 06:35 PM
1

They're pretending we are the reason there are so few female libertarians, which is laughable. If only we started kissing feminist ass they are sure to get on board with limited government! I mean, they support abortion, so they are already practically there!
/r/MGTOW25/09/15 08:49 PM
3

Exactly. Apparently libertarianism is mostly about celebrating gay sex, abortion and illegal immigration. And here I thought it had to do with individual liberty as the highest ideal and opposing the military-industrial-corporate-prison complex. Good thing we have a bunch of experts down in Washington D.C. to tell us what our priorities need to be!
/r/MGTOW25/09/15 08:20 PM
3

I would have expected better from Reason. But neither am I entirely surprised. Feminists are libertarians because they're pro-abortion. LOL. Articles like this are why most libertarians consider beltway-insider cosmo "libertarians" a joke.
/r/MGTOW25/09/15 07:41 PM
3

Yea I'm not interested in gossip or celebrities or whatever vain shit woman drone on about. I'm there to work. They will waste literally half the day chatting about nothing yet never be called out on it. god forbid i ever take a long lunch though.
/r/MGTOW25/09/15 03:39 AM
2

Of course they probably all talk behind my back calling me gay or some shit. oh freakin well. Better than getting fired by the female-dominated HR department when one of them inevitably reveals her duplicitious nature.
/r/MGTOW25/09/15 03:29 AM
3

I ignore the women at work and would so even if I wasn't mgtow. You know, "don't shit where you eat."
/r/MGTOW25/09/15 03:24 AM
9

Vice and most media is liberal. Liberals hate the idea of mgtow because we are not willing pawns in their bullshit social-engineering schemes. They consider themselves elitists who think they have the right to direct how others choose to live their lives.
/r/MGTOW25/09/15 01:06 AM
3

... Everything.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:08 PM
9

They want all of the reward with none of the responsibility. Hard to blame them. I'd do it to if I could get away with it.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 04:40 PM
3

Its like when they say "inflation is down" but neglect to mention the figures don't include things like "food". Oh, but the costs of luxury yachts have been steadily declining, so all is well.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 04:15 PM
0

Of course on this issue Bill Burr is a gigantic hypocrite.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 03:47 PM
1

At the same time, older people are more likely to actually have money. They're not going to sell an 18 year old a Lexus.
/r/MGTOW24/09/15 03:05 PM
18

How we ever got labelled as a hate group is beyond me. "Truth is treason in an empire of lies" - George Orwell
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 01:07 AM
7

http://juicedmuscle.com/jmblog/sites/default/files/images/b6.jpg Star Wars action figures from the 1970s on the left Star Wars action figures from the 1990s (current) on the right Not exactly subtle
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:00 PM
1

She finds him attractive because of his game. A guy that looks like him and has no game isn't going to get anywhere.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 10:55 PM
2

Not to mention it is a self-selecting "study", which makes it worthless on its face.
/r/MGTOW23/09/15 10:01 PM
7

It was already clear what the "author's message" is. We just think it is asinine. Something like this will eventually be implemented and it will backfire -- just like with affirmative action. If you let unqualified people in don't be surprised when they're not able to cut it.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:50 PM
4

The "conservative" label has been ruined. The vast majority of conservatives support a massive government, from military adventurism, to the drug war, to the surveillance state, etc. As an advocate for government that is actually small and limited (not just baseless rhetoric), I consider myself a libertarian.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 04:01 PM
1

How about the teenage guy recently arrested for "child porn" because he had nude pictures of himself on his phone?
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 03:54 PM
1

The important takeaway is "society as a whole" means government. It is not just that people think this way. It is that they are eager to use the coercive power of government to push their anti-male agenda. So if you believe in men's rights, please don't support the government. It really is an all-or-nothing proposition. The SJW wannabee fascists don't care if you support men's rights -- just as long as you keep voting for their preferred candidates. Don't let them play you like a useful idiot.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:40 PM
3

Politically-charged terms - and mgtow probably applies - always srem to eventually distort beyond recognition. Liberal use to mean someone who supports individual liberty. For that matter so did "conservative". Oh and don't get me started on "anarchist".
/r/MGTOW23/09/15 05:42 AM
3

I figure if I ever need the footage I can just ask the NSA for their copy.
/r/MGTOW23/09/15 05:28 AM
2

I think it can be defined simply as bachelorhood for the modern age.
/r/MGTOW23/09/15 05:15 AM
8

IIRC quora claims to be a hub of "progressive thought" or some such nonsense. Home of the Starbucks barista sociology major I guess. I wouldn't pay it too much mind.
/r/MGTOW23/09/15 05:12 AM
1

The ironic thing is wives to guys like this expect to get cheated on. They don't even care. They thrive on the status of being the one he goes home to.
/r/MGTOW23/09/15 05:05 AM
0

The average judge in the U.S. makes $120,000 a year. That does not include substantial benefits and perks. Cry me a river over these "public servants". You know how hard you have to work in the private sector to make that kind of money? Here's a hint: my dad makes about that. He has been working for a major corporation for 40 years. He leaves his house at 5:45 AM every day and arrives home around 9:00 PM. Believe me, he works harder than some self-important blowhard in a robe.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 09:51 PM
26

I've never been in a serious relationship in my life, nor had the desire to be. I'm naturally introverted, find pleasure in the little things, and don't see the need to constantly entertain some (usually vapid) women to try and win over her affection.
/r/MGTOW22/09/15 08:30 PM
9

BTW this is why I hate the government. The government does not care about men and it never will. All of you "progressives" on here who support bigger and bigger government -- this is the system you are advocating for.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 05:15 PM
20

Wow. She forced him to have sex at knife point. How is that not forcible rape? If it was a man doing this to a young girl he would be sent away for 40 years. They are setting her up for a slap on the wrist. Absolutely outrageous double standard.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 05:08 PM
1

You could live on that in many parts of the U.S. relatively easily too (as a single individual). In fact that is about what the average social security recipient gets and for many it is their only income. Studio apartment in flyover country: $400 Food budget: $300 (buys a hell of a lot of food at walmart) Insurance is "free" after 65, maybe a few other incidental costs Maybe a little higher budget if you want an automobile and all the costs associated with that But it is really not that hard to …
/r/MGTOW22/09/15 04:57 PM
10

Judges don't have it bad. Give me a break. It is one of the most pampered positions out there in a sea of privilege (government jobs). That's why it is so competitive.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 03:38 PM
2

Don't kid yourself. I've been hearing the whole "pollsters only call landlines" thing for 10 years. It isn't true. They use a reliable methodology.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:35 PM
1

People like you are the reason why they are able to get away with violating students' Constitutional rights. These are show trials. Nothing more. Pretending that they matter outside the administrative bubble is foolish. "The process" isn't relevant because it is unconstitutional, and every time it has been challenged in a real court it has been struck down. To suggest that students submit to an unconstitutional and illegal process by a public institution, when there are better options (the actua…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:31 PM
1

Um my advice is to get a lawyer immediately and take them to real court. How can that possibly be bad advice? Every time an accused student has done that the school has immediately backed down -- because they and their lawyers are well aware they are in the wrong. Their entire tactic is to browbeat students and they don't expect people to fight back. Advising students to play into their unconstitutional games when there is no reason to is the bad advice.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:19 PM
2

They can't ignore a lawsuit filed in a real court of law though.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:49 PM
4

IMO its fair to equate feminists with extremists when considering the ideas postulated by leading (not fringe) feminists. In this particular situation, it is not just the feminists whom refuse to hold false-rape accusers accountable, it is by-and-large the political and legal institutions themselves. As far as your other points I think public-sector unions should be illegal. The average government employee now makes twice (when considering for benefits) what their comparable private-sector count…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:43 AM
0

MGTOW is just another word for bachelor.
/r/MGTOW22/09/15 04:29 AM
3

I would urge anyone being railroaded by a college tribunal to refuse to acquiesce to any of the proceedings and immediately hire counsel. If you cannot afford legal representation, http://thefire.org/ may be able to help on your behalf.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:10 AM
7

Yes it is quite telling how feminists go so far as to defend the right to falsely accuse a man. We're not talking about a he said/she said situation. They don't want women to be penalized even when their accusations can be definitively proven false. Much like how police unions protect corrupt and dangerous cops or teachers unions lazy and incompetent teachers. They just don't like the bad publicity. Any sense of due process or justice be damned.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:01 AM
8

You have more faith in the system than me. There is a woman from my hometown who was prosecuted for hiring someone to murder her ex during a custody dispute. She was acquitted by a jury, despite hard evidence against her, because she argued she was so fragile that she was "manipulated" by her ex into hiring the hit man to kill him (pussy pass). The family judge couldn't wait to award her the kids after the "acquittal". Truth is stranger than fiction when it comes to gender equality.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:07 PM
2

This is why you should never trust the corporate ("mainstream") media, ever, on any issue. If you catch them lying/pushing an agenda on a subject you're knowledgeable about, just imagine the extent that they obfuscate more complex matters. It is basically all just a bunch of self-appointed elites acting unduly smug.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:24 PM
51

Thankfully he had the foresight to have the camera, otherwise he would be the one going to jail, as she claimed on the video "I'm going to call the police and tell them that you just assaulted me." -- and "women have the right to be believed," right Hillary? Let me guess -- despite this she will still end up with custody of the kids.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:10 PM
4

America has its problems but I would be embarrassed to be from the UK. It is now a place that has zero respect whatsoever for basic concepts of jurisprudence. Every time I think of the UK I think of that story of the elderly couple who had their high-end RV stolen by gypsies, reported the theft, and the police refused to do anything about it despite catching the gypsies red-handed. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2381292/Police-wont-hand-stolen-caravan-couple-protect-human-rights-travell…
/r/MGTOW21/09/15 06:31 PM
2

And you have your head in the clouds. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:37 PM
20

No your post will be downvoted because you are an disingenuous shithead. The vast majority of the money was intended for him, because he is no longer able to take care of himself. Not for "child support", where there is zero accountability that it actually goes to the child.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:32 PM
7

There was a study that came out earlier this year that backed this up -- that woman are most happy when the man in their life is miserable. http://gawker.com/5891800/every-comedian-was-right-women-are-happy-when-men-are-miserable
/r/MGTOW21/09/15 05:18 PM
3

It comes down to promoting a certain culture within the organization, which inevitably manifests itself within the overall framework. I don't know why you find this so hard to believe. The government routinely provides woman and "minorities" with preferential treatment, e.g. tax breaks not available to white men. There is nothing subtle about it.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:09 PM
4

You're being naive. Do you honestly think they are "encouraging women to apply" yet not engaging in preferential hiring practices? The very first act begets the other.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:00 PM
3

Hire the best, most-qualified person for the job? Why that's sexist/racist! It is much more fair to hand the positions to people based on their genitals/pigment in their skin. I mean, it is only the security of the nation at stake. Nothing important.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 04:53 PM
1

I don't believe government will go as far as to tax men. Too late. What do you think Obamacare is all about? A wealth transfer from single men to single woman. This is done by forcing men to purchase "insurance" policies that cover such (relatively expensive) things as female contraceptives and pregnancy, even when single men have no use for it.
/r/MGTOW21/09/15 04:47 PM
2

Exactly. It is a myth that judges are impartial. They are government employees, first and foremost.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:53 PM
1

I don't currently know of any specific MR orgs that are influential or effective enough to get behind. Probably our best allies are the right-libertarian leaning orgs that defend individual rights, like https://www.thefire.org/ or http://ij.org/
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:50 PM
21

Supporting Kangaroo courts where the defendant has no right to obtain counsel, confront witnesses, or review evidence, and where the standard for conviction is a 50% likelihood or less, is part and partial to a fascist agenda. So is giving away trillions of taxpayer dollars to the corporate/banking establishing, and perpetuating a 1984-style surveillance state that would make the East German's blush.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 07:37 PM
2

You mean guys don't actually care about a woman's new hair cut, or shoes, or makeup...?
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 06:46 PM
1

Who do you think the Department of Education answers to? The elected officials (Obama administration) are not only complicit they are advocates for it.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 06:28 PM
-6

Then stop voting for establishment liberals (like Obama and Jared Polis) who view due process as nothing more than an impediment to their fascist agendas.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 06:25 PM
2

"Since 2004 I’ve lived in apartments and condos and have noticed in that time that, excluding couples, the vast majority of the rest, 95+% in my estimation, of the renters/tenants are young single women or young single moms." Doesn't seem like a very valid statistic...
/r/MGTOW16/09/15 05:58 AM
2

Replace the Fed's relationship with higher ed. Bush has a record of pushing these types of reforms in the past. This isn't true. In fact Jeb Bush supports more federal involvement in local education. He is one of the few Republican candidates who vociferously defends the disaster that is "common core". Basically the rest of your list isn't really viable either because Jeb is not close to any sort of conservative, he is a big government establishment candidate like Hillary, and everyone knows it.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 12:41 AM
9

Good thing Rosa Parks wasn't concerned about someone "calling security and having [her] removed". In fact she was counting on it. Of course she was an activist and not just a complainer.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:23 PM
8

You say a complaint won't be taken seriously. Someone recommends civil disobedience and you dismiss it outright. It seems like you aren't actually willing to take a stand that entails any risk. So don't expect anything to change.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:19 PM
11

The fact that she didn't lost her job means that Rolling Stone now has zero legitimacy as a journalistic outlet. Just like the fact that James Clapper didn't lose his job for lying to Congress about NSA spying means that the federal government is now illegitimate.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:05 PM
4

Most likely they will just use this as an excuse to steal more taxpayer money.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:10 PM
2

Go back to Russia! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRfHlBk4Pcg
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:26 PM
1

Then start your own barbershop and do it like that. In a free country the owner should be able to decide. I'm talking actual freedom - individual liberty. Not the twisted "positive" version of it.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:36 AM
1

Why shouldn't he get to decide if he's "doing it wrong". It is his business. This very same mentality enables feminism.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:30 AM
-1

Yea fuck individual rights! Better hope the almighty legislature never goes after men's rights (too late).
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:27 AM
0

Any private establishment should be able to refuse sevice to anyone for any reason. Freedom includes freedom-of-association. By supporting this you are supporting the same big government-mentality that allows for instituional sexism.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:22 AM
1

Lol so you support the law?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 01:07 AM
0

I didn't think to look at the PA specific laws. Just did a quick search of Curve's national policy. Personally I believe there should always be complete freedom-of-association.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:48 AM
2

There can be no such thing as a male-only space. Of course women"s spaces - like Curves gym - are inexplicably not covered by these "public accomodation" laws.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:23 AM
18

Yeah, he can submit the proposal to the White House Council on Women and Girls. I'm sure they'll get right on approving it.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 09:03 PM
1

The U.S. is not a democracy. It is a Constitutional Republic. see http://democracyisnotfreedom.com/
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:43 PM
5

Where do you get off punishing other people for engaging in consensual activities? I hate the liberal mentality. You don't own or control anyone but yourself.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:41 PM
13

It aint easy having standards. I'm actually surprised to see this come out of the SJW-hugbox that is PBS.
/r/MGTOW03/09/15 02:53 PM
2

Justice will be done when the people responsible lose their jobs. So justice will never be done.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:06 PM
17

Actually feminism and "functioning liberal democracies" go hand in hand. Democracy is all about using coercive government to force people to do what they otherwise wouldn't. Feminism is about utilizing that force to reward women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:00 PM
11

The same as if you are accused of any kind of crime -- clam up and get a lawyer. Never, under any circumstances, talk to the police or other "authorities" without a lawyer present.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:44 PM
3

What are you, their lawyer? The flyer asks "Why do women represent seven out of ten manager's in our company owned restaurants?" It then answers the question with: "We believe empowerment works". It isn't even an implication. It is an outright statement that McDonalds has made a conscious effort to "empower" female employees. - to promote them to manager at the expense of male employees, who apparently are already "empowered" enough.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 05:59 PM
40

The vast majority of police and prosecutors are sociopaths. They are naturally attracted to that line of work. If you want to stay out of jail, never, ever, talk to a cop, at any time for any reason.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 05:53 PM
7

You forgot about most of government, media, education (K-12 and higher), tech companies, and corporate H.R. Unfortunately the SJW problem extends way beyond tumblr.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 04:01 AM
6

Exactly. The professional victim classes don't want equal rights under the law -- they want special rights enforced through coercion.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 03:55 AM
7

Probably because more women apply for managing positions, or of the people who apply, the women have more related experience and have better academic records etc. that may be why. The flyer heavily implies that the reason is because McDonalds corporate makes gender-based hiring decisions.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:21 AM
3

Thanks to Robby Soave from Reason magazine for continuing to push this issue in mainstream publications. David Lisak should be ashamed of himself, if that is even possible. Any legitamite researcher would be quick to defend their findings. The fact that Lisak refuses to do so says all that needs to be said about his "work".
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:54 PM
7

From what I've seen a woman can be completely sober and even enthusiastic during the act, but if she later comes to regret it, then it is rape. Basically woman have no responsibility whatsoever in the eyes of the law, regardless of their state of intoxication.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 09:13 PM
7

The lawsuit should be expanded to cover her as well. Sure seems like she implicates herself here.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 09:02 PM
4

I don't deify Reagan. The federal government grew massively under Reagan. He was a failure as a politician as far as I'm concerned. If Reagan is your barometer no wonder you like Trump.
/r/MGTOW29/08/15 12:39 AM
7

Donald Trump is a liberal Hillary supporter (as evidenced by his numerous donations). I'm voting for Rand Paul, the only candidate who supports limited government.
/r/MGTOW29/08/15 12:20 AM
8

The Rolling Stones didn't beat around the bush: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfGYSHy1jQs
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 11:35 PM
-2

Learn some basic history, moron, before trying to impose your murderous ideology on the rest of us.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:48 PM
2

Yeah, you're right, it is worse. Many, many more people have suffered at the hands of socialists than ever did the Nazis.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:34 PM
0

No he will just do whatever he can to make life worse for the little people and better for the oligarchs -- like all socialists.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:24 PM
-6

Hardly. Would you vote for someone who proudly refers to himself as a Nazi? Sanders has allied himself with some of the worst, most dangerous people to have ever walked this earth, and he should be constantly called out on it.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:18 PM
6

If I were him I would leave the country and never come back.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:13 PM
1

LOL a state university run by SJWs who hate straight white males is the best place in the world? You need to get out more.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:09 PM
-13

Sanders isn't honest or intellectual. He is an old school socialist. You know like the ones who murdered tens of millions of people in the 20th century, and had a smile on their face when they were doing it.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:04 PM
8

If only America could be more like Venezuela, where the paper currency is literally worth less than toilet paper. Bernie '16!
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:03 PM
2

To be fair it's not like its just black men killing people for no reason. It is largely black men killing other black men over conflicts brought on by the government's war on drugs. As usual it's the government's fault (and anyone who supports it).
/r/MensRights28/08/15 09:51 PM
-3

Sorry that you feel the need to give your money to such an institution.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 09:47 PM
-9

100 million people murdered by their own socialist government in the 20th century. Fuck you Bernie you fascist.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 09:45 PM
8

Sure. That's the ideal. I guess my point is: never talk to the police without an attorney under any circumstance. Because they are out to get you -- that is their entire job -- and they will lie to you, twist your words, browbeat you, etc. Don't let it happen or you could easily end up innocent and in jail.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 05:15 AM
15

Cops aren't as benign to the process as you make them out to be. Their job is to make an arrest and they will do whatever it takes to make that happen. They are not impartial. They are rewarded for bringing people in regardless of the facts. Justice doesn't enter into it. The system is corrupt. Police work for the district attorney and together their job is to put people in jail.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 05:05 AM
22

Also he probably should be calling an escort agency not (apparently) picking up crack hos on street corners.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 03:08 AM
19

Just look what happened with the Duke Lacrosse case. BTW I'm still waiting for the ESPN "30 for 30" on that (probably shouldn't hold my breath).
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 03:02 AM
5

There are also plenty of guys in college who probably shouldn't be. It is because nearly everyone goes to college after high school without a second thought. Think about it: the educational complex and the federal government are in collusion. Young adults graduate with mortgage-sized debt (but no house) and few if any actual job skills. Yet the tuition keeps getting higher and the administrators keep getting wealthier. One would think with the tremendous technological increases over the past dec…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 02:38 AM
8

"Never let your schooling interfere with your education." - Mark Twain
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 02:20 AM
21

According to the article, The New York Times and the Washington Post were parroting this yesterday.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:51 PM
0

Yes, like when they encourage other women to get a short haircut. No women has ever been made more attractive by lopping off their hair. Some might be able to "pull it off" better than others. I wouldn't be surprised if most women giving advice to other women are actively trying to sabotage their competition.
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 08:42 PM
-5

I doubt a standing army is even really necessary for actual defense of the homeland, not to mention a behemoth military that is 3 times the size of all other countries armed forces combined. I'm pretty sure another country attempting to occupy the U.S. would quickly come to regret it, given that there are 300 million guns in private hands.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:45 PM
42

Some excerpts from the article: "About 0.00029 percent of the workforce were murdered while on the job. Does that sound like an incidence rate that could accurately be described as 'incredibly common'?" "Men made up 83.5 percent of all workplace murders that year—an overwhelming majority." "In fact, there were more men murdered at work in 2013 (341) than there were women who died at work of any cause at all (321)."
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:58 PM
13

Maybe guys are reluctant to risk their jobs dating in the workplace, given the capricious and vindictive nature of females and female-dominated HR departments? No can't be that.
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 06:19 AM
6

Women get the vote, and it is immediately proceeded by the enactment of horrible social (prohibition) and economic (government causing/sustaining the great depression) policies. Coincidence? If you ask me America is still coasting off its pre-20th century glory, and its standing after the second world war. But its running out of gas fast.
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 04:54 AM
1

alpha hipsters http://41.media.tumblr.com/3a5de14a83decbdb652b64a78a9e9cc5/tumblr_n04nzlEjde1snu2iyo1_500.jpg
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 04:42 AM
12

Sadly this tripe was written by a guy. "Slaving away in p.r., education, nursing, event planning or other female-dominant fields? Time to get a new job. “Stanford sociologist Michael Rosenfeld reports that 10 percent of Americans meet their future spouses at work,” Birger says. Some careers to consider: mechanical engineering (93 percent male), computer network administration (83 percent) and financial advising (74 percent)." Wanna land a man? Why not become a mechanical engineer!
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 04:37 AM
2

Maybe try /r/legaladvice
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 03:12 AM
36

LOL at the advice to "issue ultimatums". Oh yeah, guys love that.
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 03:09 AM
2

Yeah it was just an observation. She probably intentionally used makeup to look a little older, as no one really takes a 24 year old seriously. Didn't mean for my comment to come off callous. Sad situation.
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 02:55 AM
6

Wish I hadn't watched that...not that it is gory or anything but still disturbing. Reminds me of something that would've been on "Stile Project" back in the day.
/r/MGTOW27/08/15 02:54 AM
5

I'm sure those girls can't wait to fuck that "male feminist" hahaha
/r/MGTOW26/08/15 08:15 PM
24

Damn, she was only 24? Looks about 40 in that pic. The guy looks 10 years older than he was too. I don't really see the gender angle here. Not surprised if an on air reporter - a local celeb - gets more attention than the guy behind the camera, although the coverage actually seems pretty even.
/r/MGTOW26/08/15 03:49 PM
5

so robbery is legalized! It has been that way in the UK for quite some time. Check out this article about a retired couple who saved their whole lives to buy a nice RV: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2381292/Police-wont-hand-stolen-caravan-couple-protect-human-rights-travellers-living-it.html TLDR: It was stolen by gypsies and police refuse to do anything about it because the thieves "need it more"
/r/MGTOW26/08/15 03:11 AM
1

Doesn't sound like it was written by a woman...possible but I doubt it.
/r/MGTOW26/08/15 03:01 AM
3

I live a pretty minimalist lifestyle, but its not because I don't like nice things, but more that I don't want to put in the time and effort required to get those things. We only live once (as far as anyone knows) and I'd rather not have to spend the majority of my limited time on earth as some corporate drone, working a job I hate, just to acquire stuff I don't really need. I want to work just hard enough to cover the basics and a couple small luxuries. I don't know -- maybe it is because I hav…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 11:13 PM
3

The members of Rush became pussified SJWs a couple of years ago. I think it was in an interview with Salon lol
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 08:52 PM
3

TLDR: Straight male student rejects advances from gay professor. Professor retaliates by taking away promised scholarship. Student complains to administration yet no action is taken. How dare this "privileged", "cisgender" white male student speak up about this unfair treatment? Doesn't he know the professor is in a "protected" class that makes him not responsible for his actions?
/r/MensRights20/08/15 06:17 PM
1

Mgtow is a (demographic) trend. That's what makes it noteworthy.
/r/MGTOW20/08/15 06:17 AM
2

Yeah nothing wrong with MRAs although I don't see a lot of actual activism going on. Really the only orgs effevtively working for men's interest are a few libertarian ones (Koch) like FIRE, CATO and Reason mag. Those entities have been bringing lawsuits, drafting and critiquing legislation., and conducting journalistic investigations - things that actually might make a difference in the real world.
/r/MGTOW20/08/15 01:14 AM
7

Exactly. ESPN has become a joke more interested in gossip and drama and sanctimonious moralizing than covering sports. Kind of like how MTV used to have music instead of 'reality' shows promoting irresponsible behavior.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 05:32 PM
1

Oh yea I forgot about the leaves. I've only done the extract and it is intemse ( not really pleasent).
/r/MGTOW19/08/15 01:03 AM
9

The best (and really only) way to beat this is to support alternstive media oulets. Oh and PLEASE use donotlink when lnking to this mainnstream (corporatist) garbage.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 12:52 AM
1

The SJWs don't care what you think about them -- they only care that you keep voting for their candidates.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:40 PM
4

How are there any "anarchists" on the left? Anarchists are basically extreme libertarians who don't consider the state or its use of coercive force to be legitimate, and would like to replace it with consensual, co-operative institutions. I know it is a common thing to try and pass off ski-mask wearing, molatov cocktail throwing socialist rioters as "anarchists", but they advocate for the exact opposite ideological goals as actual anarchists. It is kind of like calling the Nazis "right wing". It…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:37 PM
4

They are also in the middle of a full out attack on Amazon.com for not being a "touchy feely" corporation. Ever institution in society must be like the government, where mediocrity and incompetence is expected, encouraged and rewarded.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 08:33 PM
1

That wasn't salvia. Salvia only lasts a few (very intense) seconds, not hours. And you don't smoke it out of a bowl; you need a big rip like out of a gravity bong to feel its effects. Sounds like you ingested some research chemical instead.
/r/MGTOW18/08/15 07:15 PM
-2

Learn some economics. The minimum wage hurts unskilled workers. That is why its biggest proponents are the unions despite union workers making way more than minimum wage.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 09:03 PM
-2

Reddit in general is full of left-leaners because it is full of people who are young and naive. Hopefully as the movement matures, the fact that big government and gynocentrism are inextricably linked, will no longer be overlooked.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 08:33 PM
3

Ask Cliven Bundy how ineffective small militias are against the Federal Government.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 09:24 PM
8

About 17% of Americans are on food stamps, or about 46 million people.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 04:21 PM
2

The MRM should align itself with the right, but with libertarians, not the tradcons. Many of us already fit naturally into that camp. Tradcons are just one segment of the GOP, and a diminishing one at that. "This whole sort of war on women thing, I'm scratching my head because if there was a war on women, I think they won." - Sen. Rand Paul, libertarian-learning presidential candidate
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:34 AM
3

Interesting post. A search shows Google gets its definitions from the Oxford Pocket Dictionary of Current English. A search for "rape" [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/rape] has language that definitely is not gender-neutral . Dictionary.com [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rape?s=t] is better. So I'd say it is good that they don't display it. Although I doubt it was intentional.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 06:35 AM
3

You claim the poor can't access healthcare. I responded with a federal program where anyone who makes less than 133% of the poverty level gets free healthcare. So your claim is inaccurate. What you should have said is you want "universal healthcare" with no price controls where costs skyrocket and innovation stagnates.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 05:04 AM
1

I guess the 72 million people on Medicaid don't count?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:33 AM
1

I can only laugh at the left's Orwellian doublespeak where they conflate limited government proponents with Nazis. Hey morons, the Nazis supported a large totalitarian, fascist government, that was involved in every aspect of people's personal and economic lives. That is your goal, not ours. Even having attended public school, where they go out of their way to not teach critical thinking skills, is no justification for so badly misunderstanding this basic concept.
/r/MGTOW30/07/15 04:57 PM
2

Of course men's rights is a civil liberties issue. Unfortunately, the institutional left does not care about the civil liberties of men or individual liberties in general. The "progressive" ACLU is ambivalent at best toward men's rights and sometimes downright antagonistic. The only civil liberties organizations I've found to consistently be in men's corner are libertarian ones, such as the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education. The same goes with the media, which shapes public perception…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:18 AM
3

It does look like there are some Men's Rights organizations out there, but they neither have the money nor the influence to make much of a difference. MRAs seem to be divided pretty evenly among 'progressives' and 'libertarians' - two diametrically-opposed ideologies that makes cohesive political action difficult.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:31 AM
16

Her real name is out there. Google "Jackie" and "Encyclopedia Dramatica". Yes I just read an AP article on the lawsuit that had this line: "Despite its flaws, the Rolling Stone article heightened scrutiny of campus sexual assaults" "its flaws??" I suppose being a completely made up delusion with no basis in reality is a flaw, isn't it? In SJW-land, everything must be presented as the truth and spun as a win, even despite all evidence to the contrary. Do you remember the police report that came o…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:56 AM
5

Interesting point about the political ideologies that dominate the two factions. There really is no fighting against the emergence of the Total State. It is like an unstoppable train that has been speeding up for decades. I once met David Nolan, the founder of the Libertarian Party, and I thanked him for everything he had done advocating for freedom. He just looked at me askew and said "it was a big waste of my time." A couple of years later he was dead of a heart attack. Why engage in a futile …
/r/MGTOW30/07/15 04:02 AM
5

I read that after she made a big deal on social media someone from JC Penney corporate tried to contact her but she wasn't interested. Sounds like the huge retailer was willing to bend over backwards to please this entitled princess and it couldn't even do that.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 02:46 AM
8

This goes against people who say that college administrations are just doing what they are told. They have instituted these kangaroo courts because it is part and parcel to their ideology. Now that they have their preferred system in place, they are no longer interested in what the federal government has to say. Hopefully they will continue to be sued. Maybe when some of these limousine liberal administrators lose their summer homes, then there will be change.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 02:36 AM
3

Exactly. Talk about projection. Victimization is a central tenet of the left.
/r/MGTOW29/07/15 04:56 PM
9

TLDR: "Expert" repeatedly cited by President Obama, major media turns out to be a complete fraud, which becomes obvious under only the barest of scrutiny.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:19 AM
4

We are adults and can say what we wish, insofar as it's not hate speech You should have stopped before the comma. There is no such thing as "hate speech". Speech is speech. Most feminists would probably consider many posts on this sub to be "hate speech" and would be happy to ban it. Just look at what has happened in Canada, with a man facing jail for disagreeing with SJW-thugs online. Don't concede an inch on this most fundamental of rights.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:24 AM
38

I hope he wins too but since none of the people personally responsible will actually be held financially (or otherwise) responsible, it won't change anything. Kind of like how no one at Rolling Stone was fired or even disciplined. I mean, maybe they learned to be less obvious in their biases but they probably consider themselves the victims. NYC just paid out millions for the murder of Eric Garner. Did the cop face any kind of reprimand? Somehow I doubt it. Nor did the corrupt police union which…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:08 PM
9

About a month ago I went camping. It was a beautiful day and I was standing by a gorgeous lake. All of a sudden comes this guy lugging a canoe with his overweight girlfriend behind him. I watched for two minutes as she bitched and complained about everything she possibly could, from the bugs to the likely temperature of the water. One look on the guys face it was obvious he regretted bringing her. Heck she definitely ruined the moment I was having trying to commune with nature. Thanks but no tha…
/r/MGTOW15/07/15 08:27 PM
5

Yes. it is a good idea to let him know your concerns and expectations in a no-nonsense manner. If you feel he continues to not live up to his end of the bargain, consider filing a complaint with your state's Bar association (or at least threaten to do so). I'm not surprised it is taking so long though. That is how the legal system (and especially "family" courts) works. The idea is to drain your resources and will to fight. Good luck.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:58 PM
3

I doubt anyone here can answer that. Sounds like info you should be demanding of your attorney...that is what you are paying him for supposedly.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:06 PM
6

Yes it is a libertarian org largely funded by the Koch brothers (gasp!). They also fund another org called the Institute for Justice which fights against unreasonable licensing schemes, eminent domain, and property forfeiture abuse. The ACLU is useless when it comes to protecting individual rights. Like most liberals, they are all talk when it comes to actually defending the little guy.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 08:00 PM
-3

Oh yeah, socialism, what a fresh new idea! Clinton is corporatist scum but Bernie Sanders is worse. He is dangerously ignorant of history, economics and the human condition.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:14 PM
1

Just because it shouldn't happen doesn't mean it can't happen. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution limits the federal government to only 18 enumerated powers. Do they limit themselves to that? The NSA spying on every American at all times surely violates the 4th Amendment. Yet it happens. The Constitution isn't even an after-thought to these fascists. I am not saying it will happen all at once. But people "educated" in these institutions will slowly come to dominate the legal system and chi…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 03:44 AM
15

Salon, HuffPo, MSNBC, VICE, The Young Turks... Rolling Stone and every outlet that uncritically bought their BS story... (including the Wire services like AP and Reuters). Basically every media outlet is on the SJW bandwagon, except for a few conservative/libertarian ones.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:33 AM
3

even Fox News doesn't go that hard with their bullshit. Considering Fox News is one of the few major media outlets that consistently stands up for men's rights, I find this comment ironic.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:55 AM
1

There are libertarian-conservative organizations that can help, like the Foundation for Economic Education and the Institute for Justice.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 02:07 AM
2

The problem is the college students of today are the lawyers and politicians of tomorrow. Actually we might not have to wait too long -- a highly respected legal institute is already calling for the college tribunal B.S. to be expanded to the criminal courts. http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/30/the-future-of-sex-is-terrifying
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 02:02 AM
1

How about a GoFundMe campaign for whichever company is closest to creating a working Sex Bot? (only half-kidding)
/r/MGTOW01/07/15 01:18 AM
2

Women don't ever like to see men who are happy You can cut it off there. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2111203/Seeing-man-upset-makes-women-happy--shows-relationship-strong.html
/r/MGTOW30/06/15 11:07 PM
20

TLDR: Influential legal organization wants to bring due-process destroying "affirmative consent" beyond college campuses. This is why we need to fight against the campus show trials/tribunals, even if the "only" penalty is the accused (the male victim) being kicked out of school. Now they want to use that same (lack of) standard to send men to prison. You give them an inch -- they'll take a mile.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:39 PM
-1

Yes, I remember liberals complaining vociferously about W. running $300 million deficits. Then Obama comes in and runs $1 trillion+ deficits and no one bats an eye. The national debt has nearly doubled under Obama.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:19 PM
0

LOL, what is "sensible" about an $18 trillion debt again?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:23 PM
17

The entire war on drugs is an unconstitutional fraud perpetrated by fascists.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 07:57 PM
-2

Presumably he was speaking from (lots of) personal experience. Sorry that your feelings don't line up with what he has actually lived with for decades, but that doesn't make him wrong.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:14 PM
1

My point is that they almost always do go to the police (if there is any actual evidence). These show trials are for when that fails.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:10 PM
23

He won a Nobel peace prize You mean a Nobel prize. The "Nobel peace prize" is made up baloney. (sorry its a pet peeve).
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 05:06 PM
2

It is about being vindictive / getting revenge when there isn't enough evidence for a criminal charge and conviction.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:25 PM
18

Not sure if this is the right place to post it -- just thought it was too funny, especially this part. While the woman has not been arrested nor charged, criminologist Casey Jordan said the notion of a female employee succumbing to male inmates is certainly possible. "I don't want to admit that it happens, but I know women who have met men in prisons working there, and fallen in love, and quit their jobs and married them when they got out," Jordan said. "We call this, very often, hybristophilia.…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 02:55 PM
9

Why would they even consider it? She already lost spectacularly in court. "Kleiner Perkins is seeking more than $970,000 in legal costs from Pao. It had said it would waive all costs if Pao did not pursue an appeal." Now it looks like her stupidity is going to cost her nearly a million dollars. LOL.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 09:29 PM
10

How about instead they just eliminate $800k from the NIJ's budget next year? Or even better get rid of the entire worthless bureaucracy that is the NIJ.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 09:26 PM
3

They don't care what you consider yourself. They're just glad you're voting for their candidates.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:08 PM
3

Considering socialism inevitably leads to corporatism (soft fascism), it makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:05 PM
12

Feminism is virtually powerless without coercive government force behind it. That is why it is considered a tenet of the left.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:00 PM
2

100 million plus people murdered by their own (communist) governments in the 20th century. Anyone who supports such a system is a fool who doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:28 PM
1

Remember the Virginia district attorney still referred to Jackie Coakley as a "victim", even after releasing a report that actually proved the opposite and left zero doubt (to any reasonable standard) that she is a compulsive liar.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:06 PM
0

The system's job is to make arrests and get convictions. Justice and fairness are not considerations. They do what they have to in order to get the result they want. This is why you will often see mentally slow people falsely confess to a crime after being brow beaten and lied to for hours and hours during an "interrogation". Much like with rape hoaxers, police and prosecutors are not punished for knowingly pushing a false narrative, and are often actually rewarded (with promotions, more funding…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:02 PM
5

Exactly. Calling the cops, in almost every conceivable circumstance, is a horrible idea. They are not there to mediate. They are not there to help. They are there to use the color of authority to destroy your life, and facts such as 'guilt' or 'innocence' do not enter into it.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:25 PM
0

Calling the cops is getting involved... and almost always a bad idea.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 06:58 PM
2

It wouldn't be happening if they didn't agree with it. It fits the left-wing victimization agenda and penchant for authoritarianism.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:34 PM
1

How did Rolling Stones lawyers allow the "A Rape on Campus" article to be published with no stipulations? It is because they live in a total bubble and are so blinded by their agenda that they don't even have the capacity to consider the ramifications. Hopefully the legal system forces them to do so but I wouldn't hold my breath. The legal system is just another branch of acadamia.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:21 PM
6

Exactly. That's like saying drugs should be illegal because the Mexican cartels are so violent. (I think I heard Nancy Pelosi say that once.)
/r/MGTOW21/05/15 01:58 PM
5

I hope Salon, Viacom (MTV), etc. are also added to the lawsuits for the slanderous articles they posted about this yesterday. Nungresser is going to be a very rich man with a halfway competent attorney.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 08:03 PM
1

Distinction without a difference.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:21 PM
1

100 million people killed by their own governments in the 20th century genocides.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:10 PM
1

Actually the U.S. federal government is the world's worst polluter. http://ivn.us/2012/04/18/the-number-one-worst-polluter-on-earth-is-the-u-s-federal-government/ People and entities that actually own land tend to want to protect it. The government has no such incentive.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:06 PM
5

That can only happen if anyone in the liberal media cares (they don't).
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:55 PM
25

I like how she is directly suing Sabrina Rubin Erdely (the author) as well as the magazine. Hopefully Erdely spends the rest of her life in poverty. This story is the gift that keeps on giving.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:29 PM
2

Its not WaPo, its the much smaller/more conservative Washington Times. WaPo just wouldn't run this story.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:41 PM
3

Not surprising at all. Conservatives outlets like Fox News (Drudge Report, Breitbart, even National Review) have for years advocated for institutional gender equality, especially when juxtaposed with left-of-center media like MSNBC, CNN or HuffPO. Then there are the libertarian outlets like Reason Magazine, which often hit it out of the park when it comes to MRA. This is because feminism is powerless without coercive government action behind it, so the people calling for limited government make …
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:41 PM
1

They will just steal (more) money from the taxpayer.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:57 PM
3

It is beyond the point of absurdity. The Connecticut government gave 9 children - all boys - to this gay male couple. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/gay-conn-couple-accused-rape-face-trial-article-1.1310010 I would bet anything that same agency has turned away numerous straight men looking to adopt.
/r/MGTOW06/05/15 03:30 PM
2

The reason college costs are so high already is because subsidized student loans distort the free-market. Now we have students graduating with a mortgage-sized debt (but no house) and few if any useful job skills. Tuition should have gone way down over the past few decades thanks to technological advances, but instead it has gone up astronomically. Why? Because they can get away with it. The federal government and the educational establishment are in cahoots, and it is not for benevolent reasons…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/15 07:23 PM
2

Who do you think makes up these college professors and administrators (and a large chunk of the general electorate)? Former hippies/baby boomers. Their ultra liberalism morphed into fascism almost immediately after they gained power.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/15 07:13 PM
3

It is what it is. As for atheism, I call myself an agnostic because most atheists are just mindless followers replacing Big Daddy God with Big Daddy Government, and I don't want to be associated with that.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:00 PM
3

It isn't what they're doing. It is what they're not doing. The Democratic Party is on the verge of nominating someone for president who pretty much considers men's lives worthless. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:19 PM
2

Nice thought, but unless the people personally responsible have to pay, I don't see it changing much. If the lawsuit just takes money out of the general fund, or even worse, some insurance company pays, it will just be written off by the SJW fascists as the cost of doing business. Just look at what happens with every single police shooting lawsuit. The taxpayer pays and nothing else happens. Even if he does win, the same outcome is pretty much guaranteed here. (After all these "educational" inst…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:27 PM
4

It is not just limited to the ultra-feminized universities -- just in the past month I've seen television ad campaigns from major corporations pushing clean water drives for woman and job placement drives for woman. Because apparently men don't need those things.
/r/MGTOW27/04/15 04:52 PM
2

Yep. She's loud, she's rude, pretentious, extremely unfunny, and a self-proclaimed feminist.
/r/MGTOW21/04/15 07:06 PM
6

Apparently the hippies saw their government send tens of thousands of young men to go die in the jungles of Vietnam, and thought "Now this is an institution we should trust and expand!"
/r/MGTOW21/04/15 05:14 PM
5

Yet Bill Burr is just fine with letting his untalented shrew off a wife on his podcast, like the gigantic hypocrite he is. Have fun in divorce court Bill.
/r/MGTOW20/04/15 08:07 PM
1

Be careful. When push comes to shove, most prenups aren't worth the paper they're written on.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:25 PM
1

Support Rand Paul. Hillary is not only a huge sexist, she also advocates for the 1984-style surveillance state and preemptive war in the Middle East.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:31 PM
1

"Freedom from want" is not freedom. That is rhetorical nonsense. The only issue at stake here is the size and scope of government. Literally nothing else matters when trying to pin down a political ideology. Both communism and fascism by definition require a massive government. You can put up all the smokescreens you want to try and muddy that fact -- but it changes nothing.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:32 PM
1

Please take a look at this chart: http://wmbriggs.com/pics/nolan_chart.png The Nazis are on the bottom right. The communists are on the bottom left. But they both share the bottom (authoritarian) end of the chart. There is no such thing as a straight right v left spectrum. The dichotomy is libertarian vs authoritarian.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:30 PM
-1

The Nazis weren't "ultra right". Enough with this ridiculous re-writing of history. They were national socialists. They were for a massive totalitarian government. People on the right are anti-big government. An evil entity isn't right-wing just because someone on the left doesn't like it. Words actually have meaning.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 07:08 PM
0

You're wrong. Under Obamacare, even the least-expensive plans are forced to include pregancy and OB-GYN coverage, and young males are required by law to purchase it.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:43 PM
3

Check out what happened when "Survivor" tried separating genders: http://www.returnofkings.com/32053/this-accidental-experiment-shows-the-superiority-of-patriarchy
/r/MensRights02/04/15 07:52 PM
4

Progressives are taking their playbook from Orwell's 1984, complete with doublespeak and mass-surveillance. They are authoritarians of the highest order.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 07:19 PM
12

'Hart, who said his unit deals with several thousand domestic violence cases a year, said victims "frequently" recant their statements.' Imagine that.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:14 PM
1

I couldn't find the radio commercial but here is the TV ad from the same marketing campaign: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzU4if_CM_0
/r/MGTOW31/03/15 10:59 PM
1

The Masons run recruiting commercials on the radio.
/r/MGTOW31/03/15 07:37 AM
5

Of course feminists are one of the main drivers behind draconian drug laws -- just like with alcohol prohibition.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 05:56 PM
24

there is no way to prove that Jackie (or most accusers) intended to mislead police with the information we have. You can't be serious. Her entire story was fabricated. 100%. Not a drop of it was true and provably so. The police just spent months trying to find any evidence to support what she claimed and came up empty. It is so outlandish as to be nearly laughable at first glance. This isn't a rape case where there wasn't enough evidence to convict. These were the fevered delusions of compulsive…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:05 AM
24

Do you honesty think Rolling Stone would have been so quick to publish that article, with zero verification, if "Jackie" had claimed she was gang-raped by seven black guys?
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:55 AM
4

The mrm is failing, because it still cares about what woman think about it, these self proclaimed mras still give a shit about the aproval of their actions by woman. Just look at what happened with the UVA fraternity make-believe gang-rape. The real victims are those women who now won't come forward. Not the people wrongly accused. In their press statements even the falsely implicated frat pushed this line and refused to stand up for themselves. If men screwed over by the PC/SJW crowd won't even…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:20 PM
3

We already have the massive, unrestrained government spying out of 1984, I guess the left figures we should implement doublespeak as well.
/r/MGTOW24/03/15 06:49 AM
5

She never actually reported it to the police. They took it up after Rolling Stone came out with the article and (predictably) people wanted it investigated further. I'm sure a bunch of fat cops were happy to get a couple of months salary coming to the same determination that anyone with half a brain made immediately. Speaking of people with half a brain, the level of delusion in that magazine's office must be astronomical. Seven white guys at a southern fraternity rape her for hours as part of i…
/r/MGTOW24/03/15 05:50 AM
3

police said their investigation found "no evidence" of an alleged rape at the fraternity house. Police also found no evidence that a party or event took place at Phi Psi on Sept. 28, 2012, noting that a time-stamped photo from that night shows the house practically empty, Longo said. Investigators talked to nine of the 11 Phi Psi members living in the house at the time, and none of them knew Jackie or had any knowledge of the alleged assault, Longo said, also noting that Jackie declined to be in…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:37 AM
1

Except the system is not run on checks and balances anymore. The Executive Branch has usurped insane amounts of power in the past decade, and Hillary is not to be trusted with it.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 10:01 PM
1

Historically after two terms of one party the voters tend to swing the other way. It is the GOP's to lose.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 09:56 PM
2

That's all too subtle. Less than two years ago the CIA just straight-up murdered reporter Michael Hastings when he got too close to the truth.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 09:55 PM
29

Just look what happened to Dave Foley - he had to leave Canada for fear of arrest because the court was ordering him to pay 4 times his monthly salary in child support. They based it on what he was making during the Newsradio days, even though the show has been off the air for 15 years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaC-2lj6HNg
/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:57 AM
2

FX has some comedies I like - Always Sunny, The League, Wilfred. I just watched the latest American Dad. It was OK but the quality has declined since they moved to TBS. free-tv-video-online.me is the site to use - just make sure you have adblock.
/r/MGTOW24/02/15 08:23 AM
2

She probably does realize but just doesn't care because it is all about the narrative.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 05:50 AM
3

http://mimiandeunice.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ME_420_CorporateState.png Corporations are a product of the government (and vice-versa). The only way to limit the power of corporations is to limit the power of the government -- because they are the same entity.
/r/MGTOW24/02/15 03:16 AM
3

I think the difference between MRA and MGTOW is that MRA is a legal movement and MGTOW is a lifestyle movement. MRA's have to try and appeal to everyone, whereas most MGTOW's aren't really all that concerned with public perception. I would've worded the sidebar differently but it is clear whoever started this sub isn't too concerned with political correctness.
/r/MGTOW24/02/15 01:27 AM
9

I'm a libertarian but agree that probably shouldn't be on the sidebar, especially not first and in such stark terms. It isn't a coincidence that MGTOW and anti-government sentiments are linked though. (And we can and are changing the country's economic system by buying and using Bitcoin)
/r/MGTOW24/02/15 01:03 AM
3

There is one, and it's called Obamacare. Despite being a relatively young single guy, who plans to never have children, I am being forced to purchase an expensive health care plan that covers all sorts of gynecological expenses (including but not limited to pregnancy) that I will never personally utilize.
/r/MGTOW23/02/15 08:26 PM
1

It is the free-market. No one wants to see women in leading roles, not even other women, and the market proves this again and again. People want their movie stars to have charisma.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:50 PM
8

Whenever I feel down about the U.S., I just look at the UK and think about how things could be worst. This story from a couple of years ago exemplifies the downward spiral of their society. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2381292/Police-wont-hand-stolen-caravan-couple-protect-human-rights-travellers-living-it.html TLDR: Retired couple has luxury RV they saved their whole life for stolen by gypsies, they track down RV but police refuse to do anything because thieves need it more
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:58 AM
13

I'm just glad (and a bit surprised) to see a fraternity not backing down in the face of oppression, after the pathetic display put on by the UVA frat leadership.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:44 AM
7

This is how you fight back. Make them justify their discriminatory practices in front of a judge.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:36 AM
2

FIRE deals with a lot more than just campus rape trials. University administrators also love trampling on freedom of speech and association. Perhaps there should be a nonprofit that focuses exclusively on MRA. But until then we should seek out and support the people who are already out there fighting the good fight. Who that is depends on the particular issue. There are some organizations out there (many Koch-funded) that we may be able to ally with - but it is certainly not incumbent on them to…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:26 AM
2

I agree money is the solution, but not to fund lobbyists, but to fund lawyers. Specifically lawyers who will file lawsuits when there is clear evidence that men's Constitutional Rights are being violated. (Such as with the college rape tribunals). We're very unlikely to ever win the PR war. The people who control public discourse in the U.S. are not on our side. We need to win in the courts. To get the laws overturned and to bankrupt any public institutions that refuse to acquiesce. We need to m…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:14 AM
5

It is a simple issue and there is a simple answer - you just don't want to admit it. Someone not wanting to report an assault is not the system's fault. That is an individual failing, and probably has more to do with the (lack of) veracity of the accusations than anything else.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:35 PM
7

If someone is actually a victim of a violent felonious assault, they should be eager to report it to actual authorities. How is the normal process an "old broken system", exactly? Because it requires evidence of guilt to convict? Due-process exists for a reason. A third quasi-legal framework for handling these charges is completely unnecessary and counterproductive to achieiving justice.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:21 PM
-11

These people are the real progressive movement. The sooner all MRAs realize this and get on board with libertarians, the better.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:43 PM
5

Probably not. I mean, women giving birth to babies is at the core of the human condition. I wouldn't want my child to be completely deprived of a mother. It seems like it would breed resentment and maladjustment.
/r/MGTOW12/02/15 05:38 AM
3

Yes http://theweek.com/speedreads/538379/samsung-warns-customers-discuss-personal-information-front-smart-tvs http://www.wired.com/2012/03/petraeus-tv-remote/ http://mashable.com/2014/06/05/edward-snowden-revelations/
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:59 PM
0

You can't reason with the Democratic Party or the modern American left. Their entire platform rests on the pillar of victimization.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:56 PM
0

When liberals say the GOP "restricts" birth control and abortion, they mean the GOP doesn't support paying for those things with taxpayer money. When they say "restricting voting rights", they mean the GOP thinks people should have to show an ID to vote to prevent fraud (oh the horror).
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:57 PM
4

Of course both parties are just an extension of the corporations that own the government, but they are about as far apart as they can be when it comes to gender issues.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:53 PM
18

Wonder how long until they start handing out citations instead of just 'friendly advice'? Here's a good rule: if the train is at capacity, each passenger is allowed only the one seat they paid for. That goes for spreading legs, bags, whatever. Otherwise, who cares? (Somehow I doubt this happens frequently during rush hour; it is not about needing a seat, it is about them constantly wanting to control men's behavior.)
/r/MensRights20/12/14 10:20 PM
13

What the Men's Rights Movement needs is lawyers to file discrimination lawsuits, and a lot of them.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:31 AM
11

She paid a handyman $5000 to kill her husband and was recorded several times asking about it. The entirety of her "defense" is that she was on drugs and that her husband made her do it by being "verbally abusive" (as if it didn't go both ways). It is a defense that would never work for a man. Therefore verdict = pussypass.
/r/PussyPass13/12/14 01:14 AM
12

Also despite being charged with attempted murder, the "family court" judge gave her custody of their daughter.
/r/PussyPass12/12/14 11:51 PM
11

Apparently it is the husband's fault she tried to have him murdered. Now watch the shitty state not even bother to retry. Unbelievable.
/r/PussyPass12/12/14 11:49 PM
12

AFAIK the mustache and cowboy boot details are inaccurate. She put them in because she knew it was wrong to pinpoint the real "campus conservative Barry" and thought this would absolve her of that. Conversely, I think it points to premeditation in libeling him.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:56 PM
10

Why should a proven liar and fraud be given any consideration? She is a criminal, not a victim.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:26 PM
2

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/publisher-alter-lena-dunham-book-755193 "We are offering to pay the fees Mr. Minc has billed his client to date," Random House said, in part, according to Minc. "I don't know if that will be good enough for my client. Ideally, we were looking for something from Miss Dunham," Minc said.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 03:28 AM
13

She had several opportunities during radio interviews to identify "Barry" as a pseudonym yet neglected to.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:36 AM
23

Yes but I think they have overplayed their hand and people are starting to catch on.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:10 PM
2

Adding a few incorrect descriptors doesn't absolve her of libel. At least I doubt it.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:01 AM
2

Next they'll have Donald Glover playing spiderman (and Michael Cera playing shaft). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULdm2NLrN4E
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:16 AM
2

I'm libertarian and I vote Republican. If you are a liberal and support men's rights, please don't vote for the Democrats. The Democrats are the party of the SJW and the contrived "War on Women". Don't vote, or vote Green or Socialists or whatever. The Democratic Party is not a friend of gender-neutral rights.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:12 AM
2

I think she fucked up big and it will cost her a lot of money. I know Barry has already obtained an attorney.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:53 AM
5

There is a reason they did it on a Friday afternoon.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:49 AM
5

LOL look at this comment left on a local news article about the retraction: Dear Rolling Stone. GROW SOME BALLS. Can't you see the cover up by the school. The fraternity and the board of the fraternity. Unless your Jackie clearly states that she is lying. Don't back down. It looks like you are also being paid to keep quiet. Some of them still refuse to back down!
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:43 AM
1

Wake me when there is a 2 minute retraction on the NBC Nightly News https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkEGSR2uOJ0
/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:42 AM
1

Thanks for the comment. I don't currently have a twitter account so it is probably not going to work for this issue, but I should make one and build up some followers.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:34 AM
1

Well yeah, that's the point. What can be done about it? Maybe a letter-writing campaign to advertisers? Frame it as "We are mad because Rolling Stone hurt real rape victims". It is easier to affect change than you may think.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:26 AM
3

We can hope but I doubt it. They're not going to be giving in without a fight. The administrations need to be defeated in real courts.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:54 PM
10

The question is (1) did they know the story was almost certainly compete bullshit, but decided to go with it anyway (2) do they live in a such a total bubble that the thought of basic fact-checking didn't even cross their mind? Maybe a little from column A, a little from column B.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:49 PM
17

The fraternity should sue Rolling Stone and possibly even the UVA administration. Make it hurt in their pocketbooks. That is the only way there will be real reform.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:25 PM
56

Hopefully now they can stop pretending to be journalists.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:19 PM
8

This Barry guy should sue her for libel. She has wrote a fictitious story intentionally pointing the finger at him in a very public way. There is only one "Barry" there who was a campus Republican - only one Barry period. She knew this would easily come back to him and impact his life. Not saying his last name and adding some incorrect details does not absolve her of anything. I honestly think he would win big with a halfway competent attorney.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:35 PM
9

Not that cut and dry. A quick search shows the Salvation Army receiving $188 million in annual government grants (Taxpayer Money) in New York State alone. I don't have time to find national figures but if you extrapolate it is easily in the billions of public money given to this particular organization. Therefore they are not "private" and they have no right to discriminate on the basis of gender.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:34 PM
2

The thing about the Cosby allegations is what supposedly happened actually seems in the realm of possibilities. The Rolling Stone article is about as credible as Uncle Bob's claim to being abducted by aliens. Here is a narrative of one of the supposed Cosby rapes: ‘He turned out all the lights. It was completely pitch black. He laid me down on the couch and started caressing and touching me all over…I couldn’t see what was going on. When it was over, I ran out of the room and threw up.’ Does tha…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:57 AM
10

OK so you tacitly admit that there is no actual evidence and you have no response to the many examples I gave that point to the high unlikelihood of such a scenario taking place. No more "info will come to light" because there is no more info. The story is made up because it fits the SJW agenda.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:17 PM
14

Really? Is there a shred of actual evidence (not anonymous allegations)? How can a fantastical story presented without a shred of actual evidence be considered anything other than a complete fabrication / hoax? Extraordinary claims (such as this story) requires extraordinary evidence, and as far as I can tell, there is ZERO evidence whatsoever and A LOT pointing to the fact that it is made up. (no frat initiation in the fall, no frat member was a lifeguard, SEVEN UVA (practically ivy league) stu…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 07:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter