rivigurl Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-6	When your tinder date you been texting over a week drops this line on the 1st date. You can’t claim something as a fact if you can’t prove it. Whatever schooling you got clearly didn’t teach you about the real world.	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 06:50 PM
-10	When your tinder date you been texting over a week drops this line on the 1st date. Haha okay buddy. Believe what you want, you’re going nowhere in life with that attitude.	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 05:05 PM
0	EHT astronomer confirms: "Katie's algorithm, despite the media's stance, was not used to produce the image" Yes but from that particular algorithm it helped them create one that worked. She is credited in all the scientific papers, like this one The above article I sent in my last comment states “Her algorithm was frequently better than its predecessors at reconstructing the original image from the measurements and tended to handle noise better. She’s also made her test data publicly available online for other researchers to use.”	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 04:54 PM
1	EHT astronomer confirms: "Katie's algorithm, despite the media's stance, was not used to produce the image" Here’s MITs report on what she contributed and how her algorithm stemmed the discovery of the black hole how her algorithm was used	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 04:29 PM
0	EHT astronomer confirms: "Katie's algorithm, despite the media's stance, was not used to produce the image" Work on your grammar before trying to make a point. You’re just butthurt a female scientist who worked harder than you ever will got more recognition for actually doing something amazing and historical. Calm down a bit, re-read the articles, and maybe try to look at it with a different mindset.	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 03:58 PM
-1	EHT astronomer confirms: "Katie's algorithm, despite the media's stance, was not used to produce the image" Everyone in your linked articles are saying it was a group effort. How dense are you? Can you read? Her algorithm was the FIRST part of the finished project. All the teams worked from her algorithm and changed/added parts to get a final result. She was the head because she wrote the original algorithm that would help render the image. Yeah it wasn’t “hers” at the end of the project because multiple people changed and altered it to create the image. But SHE started it all.	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 03:43 PM
0	EHT astronomer confirms: "Katie's algorithm, despite the media's stance, was not used to produce the image" one article stating her algorithm stemmed from the other teams results here’s another article with more info about her creation and how it was used I mean I can keep going, but these are all pretty much proving my point Edit: here’s one that will ruffle your feathers	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 03:24 PM
0	EHT astronomer confirms: "Katie's algorithm, despite the media's stance, was not used to produce the image" It stemmed off of the rest of the team being able to create the rest of the algorithm. There were multiple teams and people involved. It obviously wasn’t just one person, but she originally had the idea, created a starting algorithm, and led the team to create the rest. Edit: here’s one of the many articles that disapproves all of the people debating whether she’s credible	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 03:04 PM
0	EHT astronomer confirms: "Katie's algorithm, despite the media's stance, was not used to produce the image" Every one of them say it’s a team effort. There’s no way only one person could do it. There’s bits and pieces of each person’s work, and there were multiple teams. She was the lead of one of them and it all stemmed from her original algorithm. She’s a Dr. and deserves some recognition. All of you are just butthurt and are trying to discredit someone who is waaayyyy smarter than any of you.	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 03:02 PM
1	When your tinder date you been texting over a week drops this line on the 1st date. The 9 to you is probably really a 5	/r/MGTOW	12/04/19 02:57 PM