TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rj20876 Archive

View 3 posts and 269 comments by rj20876 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yeah, I doubt it will too.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 02:47 PM
2

No.Too old.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 02:46 PM
1

Idiot it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 02:40 PM
-4

This is a ridiculous argument. Radical anything are going to take arguments to ridiculous degrees. Furthermore, it's already legal in a lot of states for a 35 yr old man to fuck a 17 year old. That is why this should be an ethical problem, not a legal one. I hardly think the solution to this problem is fucking everyone over.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 01:57 PM
-4

So your argument is in favor of equal unjust treatment rather than striving for justice for all? This is a very juvenile way of viewing the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 01:50 PM
0

Did you even read the article? Or are you just an idiot?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 01:49 PM
1

How are you not understanding that i agree it shouldn't be enforced for either? Inequality is an issue for both genders in different areas. I'm going to limit it to law enforcement however since it's the issue at hand. There are different ways to address different issues. We are dealing with an unjust law. We can achieve equality one of two ways. The first is to abolish the law or ignore it for all, such as Sodomy laws. The other is to enforce it equally and perpetuate injustice on all, rather t…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 01:47 PM
1

I think that's a very selfish attittude. Like I said, you're wanting the injustice perpetuated just because it happens to some. That essentially I'm drowning so I'll pull you down with me.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 01:25 PM
3

Ideally, of course. But I don't think a woman should be punished for it because a man was. I don't think the answer to injustice is equally perpetuated injustice. It should be eliminating it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 12:48 PM
-3

That wasn't moving the goalposts or straw manning you. That's literally what you said. Change the law or she should be prosecuted. Those are other laws on the books... it was a logically sound analogy. And yes, same treatment for men. Why the hell wouldn't I be? The teens are old enough to consent, end of story. It should be am ethical matter, not a criminal.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 12:31 PM
-4

Because that is a whiny attitude. Are you in favor of laws where atheist can't run for office or blow jobs deserve jail time? Just because unjust laws are sometimes enforced, doesn't mean they should be for all.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 11:44 AM
2

I honestly don't think she should. Or a man in the same position. I think they should be stripped of their teaching license and that would suffice. They were legally consenting participants but she showed herself incapable of holding responsibility over another individuals development.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 11:33 AM
-4

So, because the law is unjust and some people suffer, all people should?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 11:30 AM
1

Her only crime is having sex with someone she was in a position of power over. This is an unjust law, for either gender. She should lose her teaching license. End of story.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 11:29 AM
4

Apparently you've never been to Most Eisley.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 11:28 AM
7

Wow, this is actually fucked up. They were over the age of consent and by all accounts willing. She should lose her teaching license and perhaps community service or something but fucking locked in a cage? Same feeling if it were a guy.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 11:26 AM
13

She, and other accomplices, entered into a series of decisions to commit crimes that resulted in the death of an innocent person. Her actions directly led to, not only the confrontation, that took his life and attempted to allow the perpetrator to escape justice. I think in the case, you deserve as much punishment as the shooter. Your actions we're complicit in facilitating the other persons. That blood is still on your hands. Either way, I'm glad she has 30 hard years to reexamine her decision …
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/15 09:23 AM
6

My god, that widow is a fucking saint. All I'd be able to say is say I hope she doesn't make it out alive and futhermore she burn on the deepest layer of hell.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/15 09:17 AM
0

You clearly dont have the capacity to read for comprehension. You're misrepresenting my argument. I'm not against teens having sex. I'm against adults having sex with what are, whether you think so or not, kids. Of course teens have sex. Teens are also highly susceptible to being manipulated whether they realize or not wait til you get older and look back at how much of a fucking moron you were as a teenager. You aren't equipped to evaluate you're maturity when you're not actually, objectively, …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/15 04:01 PM
-8

Mental development isn't complete until the mid twenties. You're talking a full decade before that, if not more. Thinking you claim the capacity isn't equivalent to actually doing so. I know i did a lot of stupid shit when I was a teenager. Moreso, any adult who finds a 15 year old an object of sexual attraction past a 4ish year difference is a sick fuck in my book.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/15 03:48 PM
-3

Legality =/= morality. When I look at a 15-16 year old, all I see is a kid.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/15 03:37 PM
-3

Wow, you're clever. You user epitome in a sentence. That is an entirely logically sound argument by the way. I'd love to see a logical fallacy pointed out. Head back to /r/im14andreallysmart.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/15 05:58 AM
0

One less to worry about.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/15 03:54 AM
-1

One less to worry about.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/15 03:54 AM
1

Putting a bullet in murderers also prevents repeat offenders.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/15 01:19 AM
2

So they're going with the "legitimate rape, body shut down" defense
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/15 03:51 AM
2

I'm all for it but how is this a pussy pass denied? When did she attempt to use her gender to avoid consequences?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/15 02:31 AM
3

This thread isn't woman does fucked up shit...
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/15 04:26 PM
2

I'm not defending a cop kicking someone in handcuffs...I'm just defending a cop kicking someone in handcuffs.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/15 04:29 AM
8

How is this related to a pussy pass? This is just a liar being outted. Why would anyone expect being a woman would normally give her a pass on this? This is more /r/justiceporn.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/15 11:28 PM
2

Resting Bitch Face.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/15 02:10 AM
18

This should be the norm for similar cases.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/15 01:22 AM
15

Ive always believed if you KNOWINGLY falsely accuse someone of a crime, you receive the sentence that they were facing.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/15 04:56 AM
8

Frivolous plaintiffs.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/15 05:29 PM
5

"I didn't plan on becoming a symbol. It was more telling my story," she said, Dont worry. You didnt.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/15 05:27 PM
1

Wow, RBF is strong with this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/15 06:25 AM
1

I see youre adding so much to the conversation with your enlightened perspective.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/15 04:07 AM
1

Haha, good point.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 11:38 PM
-2

Thats a fair point. I read this story right as it came out, not recently. However, I still think it is ridiculous to prosecute someone in a democracy for a political/social stance that was obviously hyperbolic. No matter how stupid that statement is. I agree she should be fired though.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 08:51 PM
-1

2917.01 Inciting to violence. (A) No person shall knowingly engage in conduct designed to urge or incite another to commit any offense of violence, when either of the following apply: (1) The conduct takes place under circumstances that create a clear and present danger that any offense of violence will be committed; (2) The conduct proximately results in the commission of any offense of violence. (B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of inciting to violence. If the offense of violence tha…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 08:32 PM
-10

Have you never heard of the first amendment?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 06:54 PM
1

There was one only here with a drunk guy a few weeks ago. I was with the cops until they started threatening to confiscate cameras. This was 100% the right way to deal with this situation and with so much negative press, it's good to see good cips .
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/15 11:59 PM
7

5'11 us closer to 8 feet than 0 so I'll just round up.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 07:59 PM
1

Rekt
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 07:57 PM
1

She looks like Miss Piggy.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/15 04:01 AM
13

No. The person Reddit. He's friend's with Anonymous and 4chan.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/15 07:24 PM
30

You aren't alone.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/15 03:43 PM
1

Touche
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/15 12:14 AM
1

Which is nothing short of psychological torture...
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 10:18 PM
3

/r/iamverysmart
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 10:17 PM
2

I'm simply not wasting my time on a troll.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 06:08 PM
1

Have fun wit taht.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 04:24 PM
3

I doubt Cheney is capable of remorse.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 04:21 PM
1

No, Im not claiming that legality is equal to morality but in a state governed by a social contract you relinquish certain rights to the state and retain certain ones. The Constitution is the document that clarifies which are which. The right to privacy is not retains, particularly when you are in the midst of exercising your right to due process. It is the job of the prosecution to prove you have committed a crime beyond a reasonable doubt and they can exercise discretion at how best to do that…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 04:20 PM
2

/r/iamverysmart
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 04:17 PM
1

It is for legality though.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 03:51 PM
1

You don't have a privacy though. You are on trial for murder. Furthermore, the Constitution never guarentees privacy.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 03:43 PM
2

You're an idiot. I never said it deters crime. I've repeatedly stated the contrary. Nor did I ever claim it's application was perfect. Deal with the argument I make, not the one you think is easiest to counter.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 03:42 PM
6

The prosecution had an obligation to prove her guilt. They are required to use relevant evidence to do so. Obviously a judge deemed it relevant amd the defense k ew they had it. She was more than welcome to plead guilty and avoid a trial.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 03:24 PM
1

Have you you read ANYTHING about American prisons? The fuck they can't kill again. And rape. And maim. Better to put them down, save jail for those who deserved to be saved. And you may have a moral obligation. I do not. There is no objective morality written across the sky. And by definition it is different than murder. Murder I'd a legal term.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 12:25 PM
7

Can't refute those carefully crafted arguments.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 12:08 PM
-4

Hence me arguing don't bother with that. Convict. Bullet.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 01:09 AM
4

This is ridiculous. What leads you to believe more people would murder in a society with death penalty. Facts please. Not feelings.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 01:08 AM
8

They certainly are.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 12:23 AM
13

Don't forget the 20 stabs and sliced throat.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 12:22 AM
-1

Yeah. They're not expensive at all. I can fucking make them.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 12:11 AM
3

It does prevent future crime. Think of the guy who got off after 15 years after killing two children and went on to kill 12 more. A bullet sure as hell would have prevented that.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 12:11 AM
8

I never claimed it deterred murder. It sure as hell eliminates repeat offenders.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 11:44 PM
18

I'm not comparing her to them as equals. I'm just pointing out how dumb this defense saying the time she committed the act mattered.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 11:44 PM
5

No, but within the confines of this society that is unacceptable. If it happens in the US, Id still say death penalty. Maybe that's how the person was raised to believe but child molesters were often victims themselves. Doesn't mean we can condone the act. Furthermore, not every instance leading to a death is murder. Intent is paramount here. I would never suggest it for manslaughter or the like. I'd also like to add that I do believe the justice system needs revamped with how it deals with capi…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 11:42 PM
6

Remember kids. Erase. Overwrite. Smash. Boil. Burn.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 11:01 PM
-1

Bullets would be a hell of a lot cheaper.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 10:58 PM
9

I disagree with you entirely. You act like an amoral animal, you should be put down like one. Don't do it as a matter of vengeance. Do it pragmatically. A dead person can't kill others.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 10:58 PM
54

The 9/11 highjackers are not monsters. For 45 minutes in their lives they did something reprehensible...they died too...
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 10:55 PM
64

Considering what she did, I can't bring myself to feel any sympathy.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 10:53 PM
3

He said if you resist hard enough theyll kill you. You said killing someone for resisting arrest is never warranted... that's a scenario where it is. Hell, if your unarmed and attack a cop, I still generally believe they're justified in shooting you.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 10:24 PM
6

This isnt even marginally true. If to resist you attack the cop with a weapon, particularly, a firearm you most definitely would deserve it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 01:37 PM
7

Was expecting hoping the white knight to get tased. Disappointed. ftfy
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 01:34 PM
5

Id be hard pressed to fault the officer.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 01:33 PM
6

This story is a miracle people. It united Reddit and YouTube on the side of the police.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 01:32 PM
3

She committed assault by threatening the use of force. He was thoroughly justified in using self defense, in defense of another.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 01:45 AM
7

Even if they werent, the act of threatening violence is assault.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 01:44 AM
3

I say with all sincerity...HAHAHAHAHA
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 01:41 AM
4

But it's underreported so you're allowed to make up statistics
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 04:13 PM
3

10 out of every 3 women will be raped in their lifetime.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 04:13 PM
-42

Instructions unclear. Punching her in stomach.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 04:09 PM
4

They also believe in the immaculate conception. OP was just pointing out the two are not the same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 02:10 PM
3

No. They also believe in virgin birth but op was just pointing out its not the same as the immaculate conception.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 02:10 PM
2

Krishna?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 02:09 PM
5

It is still believed to be a virgin birth but that's called virgin birth. The immaculate conception is a separate doctrine...
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 02:04 PM
5

I don't think you understand statistics as well as you think you do.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 12:31 PM
6

Lunch time?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/15 12:19 AM
61

She literally looks like Porky Pig.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/15 08:44 PM
4

Www.huffpost.com/us/entry/5773532 What's that you were saying? Statutory rape victims absolutely can be ordered to pay child support.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/15 06:30 PM
1

I wasnt wrong. Regardless of what he could have been doing the time out of prison, he was forcibly incarcerated every hour and in essence working. Free time on the outside is a nonfactor as he wasn't free at any point in prison.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/15 09:04 PM
0

I wasnt aware that you got afternoons anf weekend off in peison...He would be in prison every single hour so in effect he is being paid for every hour he was there. You should take context before you show yourself to be a complete idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/15 11:13 PM
-1

Take your hourly amount and multiply it by 26,280.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/15 08:58 PM
-6

Sometimes animals need to be put down.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/15 08:56 PM
1

This is deep web reddit. OP's are so hetero.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 01:59 PM
1

Reactionary would be a better counter to radical than conservative.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 01:50 PM
1

Rare to see them defend their actions. No apologies. Fucking right. And there shouldn't have been. I'm hardly the guy to side with authority but I can see his actions justified in every way.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 01:48 PM
5

Let's be honest...him too.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 01:36 PM
1

By God Watson, I think she's on to something!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 01:35 PM
2

Agreed. It's not easy being a dad of twin girks, screamed ar for hurting them while brushing their hair, and then told you don't do shit by society.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 01:34 PM
1

Phil Hartman tried to. That's why he was murdered.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 01:29 PM
19

Kinda misleading considering this was the defenses case. You do realize the job of a defense attorney right?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:40 PM
1

That's because it's not done on the name of religion. If you're declaring religious reasons for an act and your religion justifies it, yes your religion deserves the blame. To paraphrase Hitch: Left to their own device good men will act good, and evil men will act evil. But if you want to make good men act evil, it requires religion.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:53 AM
1

I agree Christianity is still pretty bad but I think it is entirely fair to target Islam more harshly due to the fact that you don't see Christians blowing themselves up constantly or slaughtering schools full of children regularly, stoning women for showing their face or daring to have sex, etc. Christianity has been at least dragged to the 19th Century, albeit kicking and screaming.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 08:30 PM
1

And, even if true, it holds little significance whether they were boys or girls. It's more significant to point out they were children.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 08:27 PM
2

I agree. I'm not claiming it's all of the left, just always from the left when it's there. And I agree concerning the left as a whole. Hell, I'd settle for European left. We have a Center Right party and the Republicans, both beholden to corporate interests.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 08:24 PM
0

Tbh, I don't really see how the gender is relevant in this case. If they were targeted because they were boys, then that is one thing and I believe it is entirely relevant to mention that girls are girls if they are being targeted as such because they're trying to get an education. It seems that they are merely targeting them as children though.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 05:02 PM
16

I'm about as liberal as they come but I hate the far lefts position whereby you cannot criticize Islam without being considered racist or "Islamiphobic". Look at the attacks Bill Maher or Sam Harris get for doing so, when they have said just as bad things about Christianity or Judaism with no mentions brought up whatsoever. Islam is a toxic 7th century ideology and it needs to evolve or be condemned at every turn.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:48 PM
1

Christopher Ryan. Its Joes podcast, lol.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:09 PM
1

He has been in one other podcast 50 or so back. Hes pretty interesting.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:15 PM
12

Heres one for them: Sometime a women is just as smart and capable as the best of men...but sometimes, some are just as fucking stupid and hypocritical as the worst. How about they take some responsibility for themselves and quit acting like fucking helpless children. That would be a good goal for the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:46 AM
1

When they arent in a bracket that, by law, is defined as pedophilia.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:12 PM
3

And wow is the MOST played by women, and its still a minority. Like I said, I agree that they should be more inclusive, but women shouldnt cry sexism that every game isnt targeted towards them considering the statistics. Like I said, Barbies arent very inclusive, its not a sexist decision.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:08 PM
1

Not in mentality.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:05 PM
0

The crime he attempted.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:19 PM
1

A good chunk, maybe. FAR from the majority. Im not saying its not best to be inclusive but its not sexist that economics drive video games instead of political correctness.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:17 PM
0

No, lets kill people for actually raping.little children.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:15 PM
3

Because theyre two cases with nothing in common. Examine how women are treated in similar cases. Also, take into account the jurisdiction, the laws involved, etc. How would a man have been punished for an identical crime is the MR issue here, not a completely different one.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:14 AM
2

Agreed that is sexist. Im sure you could find just as many examples of sexist quotes on feminist boards. Its not sexist, referring to that video game debate, to question whether or not there is sexism in them. Video games are driven by economics. Women want greater representation in them, but they are not the target audience and when they are it is almost still exclusively driven by male sales. Its like arguing that men are under-represented in Barbies. Sure there will always be some guys who wa…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:07 AM
-2

I repeat, age of consent in the MAJORITY of states is 16. So its irrelevant because he is farther in age from her than he is to the age of consent. And once again, Im not arguing that this woman shouldnt be punished more severely, simply that these two stories are bad comparisons and the woman being under-punished in a completely different case has no bearing on the man being punished. Age of consent 16 (30): Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana,…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:59 AM
-4

Which is irrelevant. Age of consent is different from adulthood in most states.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:39 AM
-4

Id have no problem making pedophilia a capital offense. And accordinng to to psychology no. According to law, is pedophilia.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:32 AM
-3

im saying there shouldnt be a comparison. Compare it to a 15 year.old girl who was abused and the man got a MUCH harsher punishment...thats a good comparison to make a point. These are just two cases that involve underage where one got off light. Other than that, no similarities and the guy definitely got what he deserved, fabricated or not he acted on it and attempted to prey on a child.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:30 AM
0

I agree, but I dont think picking two.cases out.of no where, one where justice was served and one where it wasnt is a good comparison. Using a case where a guy had sex with a 15 year old and was punished would be.more effective.and a better comparison, imo.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:05 AM
-2

You are making arguments in my name that I never made... Im not claiming that the female shouldnt be punished... I said she should. Im saying this is a faulty comparison because his attempted crime was worse than hers. Making it sound as though he shouldnt be punished was my problem. I have NO problem whatsoever with the idea of her being punished, just the belief that this guy is a victim.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:50 AM
-7

200 years ago there would also be slaves... Its quite obvious that he was thinking of it... And I, for one, am glad to see this guy locked up as opposed to possibly raping my daughters. And how exactly was he going to get moms panties? Fed ex? No, this was much more likely a set up. If not, probably wouldnt have been so easy to egg him on. He wanted used panties from a 13 year old...thats something completely different. And no matter how they viewed him...HE WAS.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:38 AM
-2

As far as body goes, maybe not. As far as capacity to understand, yes it is very far off. The fifteen year old was less than a year from the age of consent. Hers, no doubt, was wrong, but 13 is much too young to make a rational decision about engaging in sex with an adult... Its shit like these narrow-sighted views that get MRA its atrocious reputation.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:25 AM
-7

No a mans attempts to fuck a 13 year old are much worse than someone slightly under the age of consent having sex with an adult. Both are wrong, but these arent the same thing. If the boy were 13 years old and the woman had slept with him, then it would have been worse, due to actual versus attempted. But these are not the same thing. And yeah, pedophilia is about as low as you can go...
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:24 AM
-17

A 13 year old over a 15 year old, yes.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:20 AM
-8

How about this, dont be a sexual predator even if offered. If this guy wasnt an ultrafucking creep, he never would have ended up in his situation. It doesnt matter that the woman got off, though she shouldnt have, this guys crimes were way fucking worse.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:03 AM
0

Oh, I got you. I read wrong originally.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:43 AM
3

A. I wish I were the one in the bathroom with her. B. Thats fucking disgusting going after a CLEAR child. I tend to be weary of cases involving 16 or 17 year olds, but this is fucking ridiculous. If she gets anything other than a decent amount of prison time for this, it will be a fucking gross injustice.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:38 AM
3

Agree with you. Using deceptive and illogical tactics only hurts our case. I hate when people do so.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:35 AM
1

Look on the site. It cites them, mostly from FBI and Department of Justice statistics. Im sorry, youre wrong here and just didnt do your homework. Im not saying whether or not they manipulate them, etc...but they are cited.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:33 AM
1

I didnt say that they could happen, her support however alienates me. And the specific policies, as I said, her aversion to joint custody, support for mandated child support in the cases of men who did not want the children. Feminism will never get support alienating half of the population. Agreed, it does. But having sex while your drunk and regretting it doesnt automatically mean you were raped. In that case, the male was also raped if he was also drunk. Like I said, unconscious, stumbling, sl…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:57 PM
1

I use the term man-hating referring to policies that are aimed at helping women at the expense of men. Her policies would affect me as a father and demean my role in my daughters life, so yes I take offense to them. And as for victim blaming, I dont believe victim is as pervasive as feminist would like it believed to be. The Steubenville case is a very good example and its fucking ridiculous and Id be the first to stand with you and say it was fucking ridiculous and its one of the first times Iv…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:47 PM
5

Sure hope she doesnt have 3 kids to feed...
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:48 PM
70

Who the hell else would be following her twitter? lol
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:47 PM
5

This is all fucking ridiculous. The shit mentioned has seen a HUGE backlash and is more akin to hero worship than rape culture. They didnt get in trouble to begin with because they were star athletes. Thats like saying OJ getting off is evidence of a Murder Culture. Status is what saved them initially, not culture that ignores rape victims. As for the politicians and laws she brings forth...theyre all fringe candidates/controversial bills and almost exclusively from a fundamentalist Christian do…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:46 PM
1

Any feminist who isnt in favor of a fair justice system where my rights with my daughters are concerned have made an enemy of me in all that they advocate. She unilaterally champions the causes of women at the expense of men. Whether she actually hates men is not the issue, its how her policies will affect me.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:27 PM
2

Kim Gandy was the president of NOW for 7 years...how much more mainstream can you get?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:07 PM
1

Nothing wrong with it.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:16 PM
2

Like I said, their silence on the issues that favor them (such as family court or alimony) are all you need as a source. As Ive said, Ive seen a few feminist who actually do this, and I could easily support them, but keeping the institutions that favor them and doing away with the ones that do not is not asking for equality, its asking for superiority. Andrea Dworkin, Valerie Solanas, Catherine Commins, Harriet Harman, and Kim Gandy are perfect examples of men-hating feminist.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:15 PM
2

Those nasty old straw feminist are very real and ones youre likely to encounter. I agree that you should almost never blame a victim for a crime perpetrated against them, certainly not one like rape. Like I said, rape is a very legitimate one to focus on. My point is that hypocrisy and generalizing men has made them a lot of enemies that would otherwise support them.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:00 PM
1

Ive taken many courses in politics, philosophy and ethics that all include feminist readings. Look through my post history, I more often than not go against the wave of adolescent women haters on r/mensrights. I still see very few instances of being blamed for their own rapes. Pointing out better choices can help avoid a situation isnt blaming, as certain choices will make you a much more likely target. Now I agree its sad that we live in a society where that is necessary, but its still the hard…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:48 PM
2

Im not using it as an argument, Im using it as an example of inequality. Big difference. Coverage of the Steubenville rape trial has been ridiculous, I agree. However, a lot more of this, I believe, is hero worship (particularly in the town) than "rape culture." And guess what, they were convicted. Nearly all walks of feminist Ive talked to and debated have held some, if not all of those beliefs. Like I said, I can support a push for equality but it has to be on both ends, not just what suits th…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:24 PM
4

Those arguments havent been used to deny women anything. Like I said, Im in favor of equality and that was simply a list of inequalities from the other side. Im not saying feminist advocate for those things, per se. Im saying they are awfully quiet in the face of them. They couldnt give less than a shit about everyone else. Thats the nature of court...you have to treat the accuser with suspicion. It is the job of the prosecutor and accuser to prove that you did what they say you did. Its called …
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:43 PM
2

Apparently. It is a ridiculous position to take and you come off as an idiotic white knight, looking for attention. As a male, I am in favor of full equality on every level for women and have no problem working to help achieve that. At the same time, today's feminism, by and large, doesn't want equality, they want to cherry pick it. Most don't want the draft to apply to them, they don't want to give up the favoritism they receive in court when it comes to children or sentencing, they don't want …
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:26 PM
2

Unreported statistics are useless because we can only, literally, guess at what they are. It could be 1/100 or 99/100. Its simply not a valid argument as it cannot be observed or measured in any way. And tell all the guys who have have been falsely accused that its not worth expending energy to fight. Its great if you want to be a white knight, but the common person isnt going to fight for a cause that is going to continually throw them under the bus, as the feminist position does with men.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:11 PM
1

It is very easy to say. If you agree to sex and do not revoke said consent at any point, its not rape, end of story. The problem is that its such a quick go-to defense for SOME women without any regards to how it will affect said mans life.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:41 PM
1

It happens quite a bit. Agreed, those are rape. Drunk sex? Thats fucking ridiculous. Too drunk to walk right or move, sure. Bad decision after a night of drinking, that is not rape, and if it is the intoxicated male was raped too. Sure asking to stop. But the, "I was raped," in hindsight after consenting then regretting is not rape. Helping them is without a doubt a priority but at the same time, you have treat each criminal proceeding with fairness to ensure the accused gets a fair trial. The b…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:33 PM
3

My thoughts exactly. Its not a male or female issue, its a human issue. It needs to be dealt with in a way that protects victims and encourages them to come forward and seek help, while also ensuring justice is carries out and the accused receive their due process. Cases weve seen of falsely accused men as well as media coverage on Steubenville show we have leaps to go from both ends and nothing will ever be solved if its a needlessly polarizing issue.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:15 AM
2

Worse and scarier are not synonyms. Worse mean it is a more vile act. Scarier means it causes more fear. It is ridiculous in that the two words are not he same and should not be used interchangeably, considering it implies different meanings. It is not worse though, because you do not exist. When someone murders you, they wipe you out of existence. Like I said, I would love to see how many people would choose not existing over a single, terrible event. Sure it will affect your life, but you can …
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:54 AM
3

Like I said, Ill concede deal with and harder to deal with, not necessarily, atleast not for the family and loved ones of those involved. No one ever gets over the death of a loved one, you simply learn to move on and continue. As for dealing with, as far as the victim is concerned, it is no doubt painful and traumatic, but atleast you have a CHANCE to deal with it. Not just a moment of supreme terror and dying painfully and afraid.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:43 AM
3

It is VERY ridiculous to say that rape is WORSE than murder, no matter how you word it.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:34 AM
1

Probably, but its still a ridiculous argument.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:24 AM
1

Yeah, its pretty sad. Did you watch the entire or just part 1? It last about an hour, lol.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:37 AM
6

Sorry, yeah, its Kilstein. Here is the full show, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqZPioY2IWw&feature=endscreen&NR=1 It starts at 1:44:20ish
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:36 AM
11

Rape might be SCARIER than murder, as it is more likely...however worse? Im sorry, anyone who thinks this is flat out fucking stupid. Ask anyone who has been murdered which they think was worse...oh wait. Now, if you have anyone pinned down and you asked, "would you rather be raped or murdered, Im going to do one?" It would be OVERWHELMINGLY raped.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:02 AM
3

1st of five parts. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVI4A1np9zM
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:59 PM
10

It was hilarious to see Rogan systematically destroy every argument he had, particularly when he tried to argue rape is worse than murder.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:26 PM
3

Im not saying it doesnt happen, just that its not the norm and as such doesnt qualify as a culture.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:20 PM
20

Wow, you've provided a lot of data to back that up... And even if it were, how is something as extreme as stripping the presumption of innocence a solution?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:11 PM
11

I heard about it by Joe Rogan tearing apart Jamie Kilnstein for his bullshit psychobabble feminist views, lol. If you havent seen it look it up on Youtube. Its about an hour clip from his podcast. HILARIOUS.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:10 PM
35

Thats not rape culture, thats hero worship. If this had been any other kids, aside from the ones on that team, they'd have been locked up immediately. And once it did come to light, they were tried and convicted as, by all appearances, they should have been. An occasional anomaly like this doesnt point to a culture at large that defends or condones rapist.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:08 PM
93

Im aware of that, but it does attempt to expand the definition of rape, that rape is tolerated, and does encourage rights violations such as stripping the presumption of innocence, a linch pin to a fair justice system.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:53 PM
198

Id really love to stop hearing this, "rape culture," bull shit. I cannot think of one person I know who is not appalled by actual rape. What I have a problem with is the expanding of rape to mean sex you regret, sex you shouldnt have been having, sex you chose to have while drunk, etc...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:41 PM
10

I agree to an extent. Id go a little more narrow and say victimless crimes. Otherwise, I dont feel there is a significant deterrent for things such as large scale fraud. I do agree we HIGHLY over-incarcerate, particulary with regards to the War on Drugs.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:01 PM
28

I completely agree as far as mistakes go, I refer to only cases where it is clearly proven to be a conscious effort to falsely accuse someone.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:54 PM
44

I still believe false accusations should be punished as harshly as whatever you are being convicted of. If youre willing to ruin somones life with 10, 20, 30 years in prison, you should be met with the punishment your meant to unjustly inflict on another.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:56 PM
2

Doubt it but they usually find some.charges to slap you with, like the kid who recorded his gay roommate.having sex and posted it would be a good example.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 09:46 PM
2

Bullying at that level could probably be charged as harassment ore assault if threats were made.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 09:23 PM
14

Her negligent and criminal actions led directly to his death. Definitely should.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:21 PM
27

This should AT THE VERY LEAST be considered manslaughter.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:15 PM
2

Not really. Comes off more as just a dick who cheated on his wife. If it were a woman, most men here would be up in arms proclaiming her a whore and saying its not rape, so Im going to hold a guy to the same standard.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:08 AM
5

And he wouldnt be allowed to own a gun...had he already been convicted of a felony. More importantly, do you honestly believe the guy who is going to shove a gun into your throat and shoot you is going to follow the law saying he isnt allowed to have said gun? Murder is fine but illegal possession of a fire arm...well, I guess we all have lines we wont cross...
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:48 AM
0

Cant think of a single one. Im fully in favor of ACTUAL equality and fairness of opportunity (e.g. a football team is going to be dominated by guys, but simply because they are athletically superior).
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:44 AM
1

Tinkering with motors isnt what she implied necessarily made him a misogynist. That being said, my god was that chick a fucking cunt. Im glad the guy left her, I was starting to feel bad for him just by reading her bull shit.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:44 AM
0

Which makes neither right.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 03:42 PM
-8

Conspiring is an action and attempting to carry it out. Different than just a plan.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:10 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 10:32 PM
1

I agree that it wouldnt be and there is a double standard, I would simpky argue it from the mans perspective who is being victimized, not from the party whom I believe is receiving the proper treatment.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:54 PM
0

Because, its simple assault. Where you target makes no difference, your intent is to inflict pain, not have sex with. Man or woman.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:52 PM
0

Im not saying it is, im saying constantly crying its not fair will be perceived as abstact and anti woman, as opposed to working towards concrete issues.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:51 PM
-1

This isnt how you get awareness though. This is how you provoke. I mean in the sense of it will be perceived as anti-woman, not simply pro-man or pro-equality. Not just by posting this, but if all MRA do is bitch about women getting preferred treatment in cases that dont involve a man being victimized (legally, not as the actual victim of this case).
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:26 PM
0

k, kid.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:24 PM
-2

And it still will get MRA nowhere. Its seen as attacking another class, not defending your own.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:53 PM
-8

She didnt plan on raping him...she was atracking him because she was mad, not trying to have sex with him. And if you have a plan, you cannot be prosecuted for it, so long as you do not act on it. Thought crimes are for 1984 and totalitarian regimes, not democracies.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:45 PM
-3

It probably would, but thats the problem, not that she wasnt charged with rape or sexual assault. The problem is that a man would be. MRA will never get anywhere with the, "ITS NOT FAIR, she should be over-punished too," argument. Im practical and think we should devote our focus to when we are being treated unfairly, not when women receive preferential treatment that doesnt affect men such as criminal case, as opposed to, say a custody case.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:43 PM
1

No coercion is in order to obtain a desired end. At this point, from the article, she wasnt trying to have sex with him anymore, just pissed off and acting like a psychotic child.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:38 PM
-4

And it still stands. Either way it SHOULD be assault. MRA shoot themselves in the foot because most push for equal punishment, not justice. They want women punished as harshly as a man would be, not men and women fairly ounished in accordance with the letter of the law. THAT is why MRA gets its shitty reputation. Come back with a good argument and maybe youll be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:34 PM
-5

Like I said previously, the assault was a reaction to his refusal. She wasnt trying to assault him into fucking her, just attacking him because she was pissed. She needs a black eye, not rape charges.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:31 PM
-1

He would... but thats the problem...not the fact that she isnt. And being a keyboard warrior isnt going to impress me so move on kid.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:29 PM
-28

She wasnt coercing sex. She was attacking him because she was mad because he wouldnt have sex with her. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:44 PM
-12

The title implies she said it, just as a precaution. She didnt, it was a plan. One is reactionary, the other proactive.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:44 PM
-45

She didnt attempt to rape him... she DID just assault him. Quit sensationalizing the story to fit your agenda.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:14 PM
-20

Youre over-dramaticizing it. He said she PLANNED on using it is cover and was talked out of it. And not haunting the guy, he just said he remembers the sinking feeling in his stomach. As ive said REPEATEDLY on this subreddit, there are more than enough actual issues, quit inventing them.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:05 PM
-1

Im a father of two girls with a horrible relationship with my ex. Just no reason to misrepresent the facts.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:27 AM
1

Through childrens services, no she cannot. You can have that legally enforced. Slsome situations differ but anecdotal evidence isnt reliable evidence. Edit:not to say its not happening to you and I sympathize. Im speaking generally.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:35 PM
2

Agree with.the general tone but its rarely a mothers choice if the father is in the.childs life after paternity is established. It takes VERY compelling evidence to prevent any contact.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:09 PM
2

Read the article.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:24 PM
1

Agreed. Im not rich and I still chose to get a pre-nup which saved me from spousal support once I was divorced. Also managed to get joint custody of my kids with minimal difficulty, so I cant complain too much.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:11 AM
-3

I like the idea of mra but I hate the community on this subreddit. Most try to appear overly victimized and it takes away from the areas we actually do experience discrimination. Nice to see logic and facts over blind anger. Gj on the divorce btw.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:13 PM
1

Can only read the oral one, but thats fucking crazy. I understand the best interest of the child argument, and begrudgingly agree that that should probably be the policy, however I do believe women who do this should face criminal charges.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 10:07 PM
7

This isnt really a MR issue. What do you want, to ask more women to start drowning for equality?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:37 PM
4

Short of force or coersion he cannot control WHY you consented but the woman did and really should get.some mental help. Probably read a dictionary too.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:21 PM
5

Divorce her.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 11:50 PM
1

83 % of all statistics are made up on the spot.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:49 AM
2

True, but holding the father accountable is also doing an injustice. The mother has ways of preventing the situation, she could merely get an abortion or put the child up for adoption. If she chooses not to, the blame and burden should be entirely on her shoulders. I see and understand your point, and I personally could not just ignore a child (I have joint.custody of my two daughters) but I also dont think law should dictate that he is responsible.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 12:27 AM
1

If she were to admit it.in a text, like this guy did, then sure it could be proved.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 12:23 AM
14

Theres always stairs to contend with, lol. But that is a complete and utter bs statement. Its going back to the, "men cant be sexually assaulted" argument.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:06 PM
27

"But one judge who disagreed warned that this decision would have dangerous repercussions on women who secretly stop taking the pill to get pregnant." Why should there not be repercussions for that? If a woman tricks you into getting her pregnant, knowing you had no desire to have a child, you should not be held financially liable.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:05 PM
3

She realizes not everyone in the military is walking around packing 24/7 right?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:15 PM
0

I was highly skeptical from your title but holy shit... I think thats one of the first times Ive ever agreed with him...
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:14 PM
2

Id take that bet.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:11 PM
-10

Dont see how this is Mens Rights unless she gets off? As of now, its just domestic violence.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:11 PM
3

Theyre taking home.more money... irregardless of what its called. And tacking it to inflation should have been done long ago.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 02:41 PM
6

Its targeted at women explaining why the issue is important to them. Its like women bitching about a mens cologne commercial...its not targetted at them.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 10:05 AM
-2

Ok kiddo.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 10:04 AM
5

Its aimed at women though, is the point. You have to factor in the audience when figuring their intent.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 10:04 AM
1

Yeah, thats what bugged me most about the entire ordeal. His point was that rape wasnt funny. Jamie Kilnstein made me an enemy trying to defend that whole "rape culture" bs. Like I said, he gets RIPPED apart though for about an hour straight, lol. Almost sounded like he wanted to cry.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:07 AM
3

Especially where.Jamie tries to.claim rape is worse than murder... laughs to be had.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:59 AM
1

Wasnt too bad aside from Hasselbeck of course but I still think they omitted the fact that his original joke was a sarcastic reply saying there was nothing funny about rape before that one dumb bitch started heckling.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:58 AM
4

Its fantastic. He shreds Jamie.Kilnstein for over.an hour lol.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:53 AM
8

Lol, typing on my phone and periodically hit a key and just too lazy to correct it.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:50 AM
66

Its actually just.showing women why.they should support raising it, not claiming anything against men... it would be nice to have intelligent debate in this subreddit not the he.mans woman hater club.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:02 AM
1

And yet the laws and majority opinion seem to be on my side... I honestly dont have the time or desire to argue with you as it is quite clear neither of us will be swayed and im not wasting my time typing out a dissertation on my phone. I rest easy know this guys will have a nice long trip to prison.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 05:48 AM
3

My argument is that it is wrong. They are two young to act rationally and maturely in a way a 16 year old is not. It ending happy is not the issue. 20 year olds dating 12 or 13 year olds are flat out pedophiles and that is quite possibly one of the most pathetic things ive ever heard. Laws are in place to protect the naive and vulnerable which children are. I guarantee for every one relationship that ends well, ten end horribly. Thats not a relationship its abuse.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:19 AM
2

If.your.children are doing drugs, sexually active, and drinking by 13 you failed them as a parent, in all likelihood. Attention, oversight and communication have been shown time and again to be the best way to prevent scenarios like this. Yes teens will be curious and interest in sex and they dont make the best decisions...thats why we have laws to protect them while theyre still too young to act rarionally and maturely with a full understanding of the consequences.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:13 AM
2

A much.older.more experienced young adult who is less than two years away from adulthood. He is.more than capable of making a rational decision and understanding the consequences. If society didnt believe so, they wouldnt have the.provision to try him as an adult. Either way, this guy deserves everything he gets and made the choice to act accordingly. As the father of two daughters im happy to know fuck ups like him are locked up.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:54 AM
2

True, but we cannot ignore the law and go easy on actual offenses because its an inconvenience either. If this were a minor offense such as graffiti.or marijuana, id be all in favor of leniency but he shoved his dick into, basically, children. This is.borderline pedophilia imo and the guy deserves what he gets.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:48 AM
2

Too.long yes, too young to charge as an adult no. You.cannot have consensual sex with someone who cannot give consent. Statutory rape should be taken very seriously, especially with girls so young and id feel thr exact same were the gender roles reversed.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:44 AM
3

And.I said 30 years was far too harsh but its not creating a criminal, he committed a criminal offense and two years off from adulthood is more than intelligent enough to not fuck children. I feel no sympathy for him whatsoever.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:41 AM
3

Its not likely, and still far too young.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:39 AM
4

Youre fucking retarded if you think middle schoolers shouldnt be having sex with high schoolers is a shit law. Grow up, kid.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:31 AM
5

I do have one. I think its a good law. Middle school is too young to engage in sex imo. Yes, it should be applied to both genders but that doesnt make it a bad law.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:30 AM
3

But its 16 in Iowa, where the story takes place with only an exemption for 14 and 15 year olds. Hence a crime.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:06 AM
3

But its 16 in Iowa, where the story takes place with only an exemption for 14 and 15 year olds. Hence a crime.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:06 AM
3

A thirteen year old and someone 2 years away from being an adult is wrong, no matter the genders involved. Its likely that a woman wouldnt get prosecuted for this, but that doesnt make it right, it just shows the law needs to be applied fairly, not that it shouldnt exist. He is above the age of consent and they were well below it. I have no sympathy for the kid, aside from, perhaps, the 14 year old. If she were a Freshman who hadnt turned 15, and he was a Sophomore that had just turned 16. Howev…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 02:53 AM
6

Which would be fine if they were in there late teens or twenties but a Sophomore in HS with a 7th grader shouldnt fly, no matter the parties involved.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 02:51 AM
2

Two wrongs dont make a right. They are drastically below the age of consent.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 02:19 AM
4

Romeo and Juliet was 500 years ago. This is kind of rapey. Maybe not 30 years in jail but 13 years is WAY below the age of consent and I can see the case against him. Lets not be counter feminazis and examine the facts.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 02:17 AM
1

These are the type of people I wish would get in very bad, paralyzing car accidents. I am a father who had to give up a house in a divorce, that I had made all payments on, to avoid a custody battle that I knew I would lose and instead settle on joint custody. Now, I have them 2/3rds of the time with her constantly begging me to take them more.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:58 AM
7

This is why so many people sympathized with Dorner.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:13 PM
1

It takes damn near an act of congress to refuse ANY parental contact.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 12:46 AM
2

Probably referring to someone who had sex and then didnt want the kid...not literally a sperm donor.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:03 PM
-6

Youre an idiot if you think she will walk... Youre karma whoring from the dumb ass women hating teens... Im a huge MRA but youre just being stupid. Can we please stick with actual MR issues?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 04:19 AM
-6

Any? No. Are there.others...? In all likelihood. Probably some that do more. Feminism is not a homogenous illuminati... Some are practical and some are batshit insane, same as MRA. I have no problem with consistent equality based feminism, for instance. As long as you are looking for equality.in ALL areas, which some branches.of feminism do, I have no qualms.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:21 AM
-9

No, the avoiding evidence is pointing out every other field of study that uses thos tactic and calling it specific to feminism. There is plenty of BS to call feminist out on without straw manning them.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:09 PM
37

Exactly what I thought. These are suppression tactics in general used by an dishonest academics.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:58 PM
21

Arent these just suppression tactics in general? Seems like this is committing tactic two...
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:58 PM
10

Ive worked with some pretty shitbag men and some pretty shitbag women. It is damn near impossible to objectively measure which gender works again. You have all the maturity of the HeManWomanHatersClub...if youre old enough to get the reference even.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:57 AM
7

MRA would be taken a lot more serious without post like this who seek to do nothing other than deride women. People like TS and upvoters make their point... How about trying to honestly engage points where both sides are right. Men make more money...women get a lot of special treatment under the law. Slinging mud helps no one. This isnt excusing when they do the exact same thing by the way, just deriding you for doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:16 AM
2

I can see why the doctor might do that, especially with how happy everyone and their mother (or in this case wife) is to sue a doctor...HOWEVER, I can also see how you would tell the doctor to go fuck himself.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:58 PM
1

Youre fucking stupid for thinking this is a MRA issue.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:59 PM
0

Meh, makes sense. Men, as a whole, are physically superior to women. Its just a matter of fact. If a high schooler could hang in college football he would get just as much attention and vice versa would be just as frowned upon.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:41 AM
5

I agree that there is a double standard but I disagree on how to eliminate it. I dont believe charging this woman for rape would be appropriate any more than I think the reversal of the genders would be rape. He called the woman over, while intoxicated and from the sound had consensual sex. Considering he got the details from her, for all he knows he could have initiated it, something, like I said, I have done in the past. I think its slightly hypocritical of Mens Rights to call this rape when i…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:34 PM
4

I have been in this situation multiple times. I honestly go by the philosophy of get the hell over it. Men and women, in my opinion, are responsible for the decisions they make while drunk. Making a bad decision, even intoxicated, does not make it rape or sexual assault, once again, imo. If he likes the girl still, tell her his position and establish boundaries. If not get rid of her. Either way, dont invite a chick over while you're plastered because it could quite possibly end in sex that your…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:12 PM
-8

Dont use logic in this sub-reddit. I love the topic, but hate the community.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:03 AM
-11

I honestly think this sub-reddit is filled with 12 year olds.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:02 AM
22

This is utterly stupid. She got him a gift and wanted attention. Same as a guy wanting a blow job for buying his wife jewelry. This is karma whoring at its finest or stupidity if you believe this really is a Men's Rights Issue.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:00 AM
2

Haha, probably for the best. Still a great bit and very applicable from an outsider standpoint.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:01 PM
-1

It doesnt take repeat offenses. At best she will get A warning. And if she ignores the court she can easily be stripped of custody... Apparently you have no actual knowledge of the child custody system.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:38 PM
-1

Not at all. File contempt of court charges. Actually they do. The visitation will stop her from moving out of state without court permission. Source: A father who has joint custody of his children.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:03 PM
4

Assuming you are also in the United States, she is probably going to get custody unless you have a very good lawyer or she is a complete fuck up. Good news, it is damn near impossible to keep you from seeing the child in accordance with visitation. If you can, record her saying this or keep text, etc, as the court takes into consideration which parent is more likely to be compliant with the custody and visitation schedule. Also, if she does obtain custody it will be damn near impossible for her …
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter