TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rlaager Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by rlaager on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Canada: Male member of Parliament expelled from Caucus He was expelled from the caucus, not from parliament.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 05:57 PM
1

If it was up to me, I would use the following principles: Legal parental rights and responsibilities come together by default. They are also equal by gender/sex. Exception: If you have done something wrong, you can end up with financial responsibilities without rights. For some examples, if you are convicted of a rape that produced the child, if you're a danger to the child, or if you engage in parental alienation, you can lose your rights. Legal parental rights and responsibilities are opt-in f…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:50 AM
4

These aren't in opposition at all. Imagine a male firefighter said (with citations to legitimate research), "Studies show that, on average, men have more upper body strength than women. That is a cause, other than bias, which could explain why there are more male firefighters than female firefighters, despite all of the fire department's diversity efforts." Then he says, "I'm not saying we should restrict firefighting to males. We should treat people as individuals. If they can pass the test, th…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:18 AM
2

That seems unavoidable due to the nature of biology. I’m not sure what we can do about that. Though if we were in the situation where a draft was actually necessary, it might be the case that female combat units would make military sense.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 04:02 PM
3

If I use my money to purchase a gun and give it to my friend, that's a legal gift. If he gives me his money to purchase the gun, that's an illegal straw purchase. It doesn't matter whether he gives me the money up front or later, as purchasing with the intent to resell is still an illegal straw purchase. A straw purchase is still illegal even if the final recipient could have legally purchased the gun directly: http://www.npr.org/2014/06/16/322650543/supreme-court-rules-against-straw-gun-purchas…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:33 AM
1

I posted separately on the broader point being made, but in terms of the actual work examples: A good rule of thumb is to immediately do a task that takes about the same effort to do as to write down. So grabbing the towel on way by makes total sense. Starting the laundry might, if that's all it was, but since that actually creates an obligation for someone to follow up on it, that should be left for its planned "schedule" (either time-based or list-based). If she wasn't constantly interrupting …
/r/MensRights19/10/17 05:36 AM
2

While the main point of the article you linked is sound, I wish it had better examples. "Adult-adult example B" is intended as Parent-adult, where "PARTNER" is wrong, and "YOU" refuses to get sucked in. It's even described as such: "Your partner is playing the righteously indignant parent - feeling justified in behaving badly because he or she thinks you behaved badly by spending 300 dollars." Despite the very next paragraph saying that "serious matters such as money...merit discussion", it triv…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 05:14 AM
2

For the sake of argument, let's take the 75% point at face value. The claim is that: .5(doing) + managing = .75(doing + managing). Working that out means managing equals doing, which is consistent with "planning and organizing is a full time job" point. In this case, isn't the simple solution for one person to manage the task and delegate all of the doing to the other person? That'd be equal and efficient. The proposed solution that each of them should manage and do is terrible. It's so terrible…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 04:52 AM
7

On the one hand, I agree with you. On the other hand, if one parent has rules and the other lets them do whatever they want, I can see how a teenager would choose the latter, but that decision is not in their best interest. I obviously don't know anything about this particular family, so I'm speaking only in general terms. There's also the case of parental alienation: parent A continually tells the children that parent B is terrible. After years of hearing this, the now-teenage children say they…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 05:50 PM
1

She was in fact charged with two felonies, and they offered and she accepted a plea deal of a misdemeanor.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 05:34 AM
2

See Freedomnomics for a rebuttal of that theory. There's also a theory about the removal of lead from gas. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27067615
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter