TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rm_-rf_slash Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by rm_-rf_slash on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You framed it as though the second thing was inherently negative but I'm not sure that's the case, for a few reasons. Mainly, the definition of addiction is fairly nebulus (three dictionaries all have slight but different definitions of which the differences could be considered significant) and you yourself even admitted that an addiction can be good, but what does that mean if an addiction is good? Does that simply mean it has good AND bad consequences, or just good ones (e.g. weight lifting ke…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 02:21 AM
2

My thinking is mostly parallel with yours. I've already read a few "X/Y/Z IS BAD FOR YOU, PERIOD" with little to no exceptions, which is disappointing to say the least. Really, the title had it right: addiction is a violation of frame, not consumption, "period".
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 02:10 AM
1

Agreed, and I appreciate you acknowledging that there are some out there who can do both with good results. That's important, 'cause if people generally don't acknowledge that, then we end up with prohibition and suddenly those bad things become way more appealing (due to being illegal) to the wrong kind of people (young, poor).
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 02:06 AM
1

I completely agree with this sentiment.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 02:03 AM
0

It may be harmful to your health, but it's also a haven for many people with seriously debilitating illnesses. Now, I'm guessing you didn't mean those people, so I'll give you that. However, it's only a detriment to success as much as you let it be. See my own reply to the parent comment for context. Reminiscent of the "guns don't kill people" argument...well, pot smoking doesn't determine your success, you do. As with guns, the same pitfalls apply here: pot probably does make it easier to succu…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 01:57 AM
3

That's a few bad generalizations. I'm a regular (not daily but almost) smoker who is in IT and quite successful. If you characterized me as someone who wasn't going anywhere, I don't know anyone who knows me that would agree with that characterization. Also equating a degree with success is somewhat of a pitfall; myself and many of the guys I work with don't have a single degree, let alone a higher on or even really want one in the first place. My point is that everyone is different and people f…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 01:37 AM
1

I actually really respect that he put it at the very end rather than obnoxiously in the middle so you cant skip it easily. Also, good on DSC for sponsoring such a video.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 06:38 PM
1

Because reaching the better end of the A/B spectrum is a means to break out of that box, and the majority of people have not achieved that yet. A/B very much concerns men since, generally speaking, where you fall on that spectrum is a fairly accurate determinate of what kind of person/man you are and how you appear to others. The spectrum gives us a central foundation to focus on and improve from there. My point is that A/B is not actually related only to how you deal with women, but is a good i…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 04:43 PM
6

This is why having masculine interests is a central theme here. How the hell can you relate to people if you only on focus on your girlfriend? I think that's where working out and taking care of yourself come in with regards to other guys -- you're going to be able to relate to better people more easily.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 04:38 PM
1

I'm American, it's not just you. I don't really comment here for that reason. I just ignore the hyperbole and take away the applicable points, of which I still find there to be a lot of. I think it has some value, though, particularly when it comes to rallying others and getting them to believe in what you're saying, and that kind of approach only works when you have mostly consensus and cohesion in some form.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 01:46 PM
12

Your responses here tell me you've got a good head on your shoulders. I would agree with the others suggesting she might just move her antics off the radar. Just be vigilant and you won't get caught by surprise. I trust you'll make the right decision regarding moving or future reactions to that kind of shit. This happened to me when I was super blue and I only wish I could've handled it 10% as well as you did.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/16 12:55 AM
0

Hmmm. A little surprising she'd come right out and admit that, but consider it a loud and clear warning shot. Right? That was the most surprising part, to me. Most women don't even seem to be aware of those kinds of behaviors, let alone their underlying reasons. That would certainly be my "sound the alarms" point.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 02:58 PM
1

I think the numbers in parens were for sources, but none were included. Mostly I'm just curious about the Stanford study you mentioned that you say is coming later this year.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 04:16 AM
6

Damn. This is my nightmare to a T. Your story is eerily similar to mine but your wife and her family definitely seem a lot more sinister than mine. I also married older (20 v. 25; now 24 v. 29) and also have two kids, both sons. I don't mean to hijack to give my story but do so so you know that I understand what you're going through, and so others here can learn from me as well. I'll skip the usual stuff about lack of intimacy (check) and plenty of arguing about that and other things like financ…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 03:48 PM
1

I honestly have no idea...I just figured it was probably better given his description and their legal system being a bit "further along" (my opinion). Contrast that with the country I currently reside in (South Korea) where I am still married against my will because I am not able to even file for divorce as the party considered to be "at fault". I'd say legal fairness is actually pretty good here in that they apply equally to men and women, but some of the laws are just archaic...
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 03:45 AM
18

He was not from the U.S., but Sweden. This is not true in every country.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/16 08:14 PM
2

The latter, to both questions. Whether to carry to term or not is a burden bore solely by the woman and so the right to do so should remain solely with the woman.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 06:14 PM
3

Glad you won. She sounds insane. I feel sorry for your daughter, though, having a mom like that can't be healthy for her at all.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:57 PM
1

Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:17 AM
-2

It's not like this is some kind of absolute. Just because it is that way doesn't mean it needs to be or will be forever. Having a legal option to terminate a pregnancy provides an alternative to locking men into these sort of rigged contracts and is good grounds for changing the existing system. To each their own, but this is a strong case for it in my eyes.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:21 PM
3

Illegal to leave? No! But, perhaps not without repercussions -- However, can someone explain sincerely why it's so bad to hold both parties accountable in that scenario? If a woman really can't terminate her pregnancy legally/safely, aren't you essentially punishing one party for the actions of both? Either way, this is a strong case for pro-choice on the part of men.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:29 PM
6

Not really. That would allow men to basically hold women hostage that did not want to birth children. Lel @ the downvotes doe. Some angry men in this sub. I have two kids and happily married so I may just not be bitter enough.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:31 AM
4

The question was never about forcing abortions or not. It's about the financial responsibility of either which way.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:20 AM
3

Abortion clinics or at least somewhere to get one should be universally available wherever this would be in effect. Otherwise if we don't provide the woman the option to terminate the pregnancy (in a safe way), she would technically be forced to pay 100% for a decision that was essentially 50%. I'm kinda torn on this in the above case. But otherwise, it's 2015. Women are just as capable and are not being forced to carry to term so if they decide they want to keep it, that is on them, yep.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:18 AM
6

Really not even a necessary site as women of all spades have the complete upper hand in nearly all online dating platforms.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 10:02 PM
3

I actually agree with you but there is one reason that comes to mind that seems solid. That is, if you have an industry packed to the gills with one gender, the industry begins to cater to that gender and sometimes that relies catering to gender-specific traits. Whenever someone of the other gender does want to enter that field, it can be off-putting at least or hostile at worst. This apparently happens a lot in development circles (e.g. China hiring attractive women to be "cheerleaders" to moti…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:55 PM
11

Scholarships are meant as incentives. The logic follows that women would need more incentive if they are underrepresented in STEM. I don't think this has anything to do with discrimination to be honest. Edit: "The logic follows" means that that is how the logic follows to them and is not necessarily representative of my opinion. I know there are illogical reasons why this scholarship disparity exists.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:20 PM
12

Can confirm, first time reading about it. Occasional MR reader. I'm inclined to grab it now for my 13-hour flight in a few hours.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:51 PM
1

"Lose" as "Loose" seems particularly prevalent compared to other common spelling errors and I have no idea why. But it's annoying.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 09:49 AM
3

"God," "Him," a "higher power," and prayer are certainly religious concepts. Atheists do not believe in such a thing, thus it violates their right to freedom of (from?) religion. Also the state should not be promoting religious groups, even recovery-based ones, without non-religious alternative (which apparently they do in bigger cities). As other concepts have pointed out, higher courts have identified AA as religious or at least quasi-religious.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 03:49 AM
7

It was almost refreshing but in the same breath that she attempts to empathize with the white men in Japan, she also not-so-subtly demeans them as basically loser, though she doesn't come outright and say it.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 01:54 AM
4

Not Japan, but I lived in Korea for a few years during and after school and this is true there as well. Some of us married with traditional ladies (myself and one other friend) but the rest fit your description, approximately. Which is not to say that's a bad thing, some of them are actually great girls to be around.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 01:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter