rndthms Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
32	Manginas apologise to women for 50,000 years of oppression; amusingly, face backlash from the Jezebel gals		rndthms	/r/MensRights	07/04/11 07:47 AM
11	Ban Rihanna's video? No, make it required viewing - CNN.com		rndthms	/r/MensRights	05/06/11 05:18 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	I reversed the gender on this banner at my university... it didn't stay that way for long. Well, most rapists were sexually molested by female paedophiles when they were children, so that makes perfect sense.	/r/MensRights	31/07/11 07:20 AM
2	"The Talk" ignores the protest, and fails to apologize for their indecent celebration of male genital mutilation. In fact, Leah Remini references (18:40) kicking a kid in the balls. Inside find their advertisers. Drop a line, and tell'em what you think... No, we shouldn't ignore it. It's the same issue - trivializing serious violence against men/boys by consistently joking about it is what leads to the social acceptability of it.	/r/MensRights	20/07/11 07:20 AM
2	Apparently I'm a troll What would you do if a woman spat in your face?	/r/MensRights	06/07/11 12:39 PM
1	Female Pedophiles Cause Children More Harm, According to Research by University of Bergen, Norway The law does not present a bias towards accusing and convicting men of sex and violent crimes. The laws and policies are biased towards accusing and convicting men: FBI's definition of rape: "Forcible rape, as defined in the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, is the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will." (http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/offenses/violent_crime/forcible_rape.html) FBI’s handbook about the UCR: "Carnal knowledge is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary,…	/r/MensRights	01/07/11 09:10 AM
1	Female Pedophiles Cause Children More Harm, According to Research by University of Bergen, Norway Aggregate data are the result of social policies. If current social policy is to target male perpetrators of sexual abuse, than the data are not objective and cannot be used to set policy for demographic targeting of perpetrators. If, on the other hand, you claim that aggregate data are objective, that means that there is no targeting of men as perpetrators of sexual abuse. Since you are claiming that we SHOULD focus on men as perpetrators of sexual abuse, you have the burden of proving that we …	/r/MensRights	30/06/11 08:07 AM
1	Female Pedophiles Cause Children More Harm, According to Research by University of Bergen, Norway No, I've given you aggregate data. You've not given proof that "aggregate data" are objective and are an accurate statistical representation of reality, which they need to be in order to qualify as guidelines for public policy.	/r/MensRights	30/06/11 07:26 AM
1	Female Pedophiles Cause Children More Harm, According to Research by University of Bergen, Norway Too bad that those types of abuses only make up a small portion of the sexual abuse, most of which is committed by men. Too bad sexual abuse only makes up a small portion of all child abuse, most of which is committed by women.	/r/MensRights	30/06/11 07:20 AM
2	Female Pedophiles Cause Children More Harm, According to Research by University of Bergen, Norway You've provided no OBJECTIVE data whatsoever to show that men almost exclusively are the perpetrators of sexual abuse. Nor have you proved that ignoring an X% of sexual abuse cases because they are less than 50% serves public policy well. For instance, one might claim that since the MAJORITY of violent abuse is not sexual, we need to target non-sexual abuse only. And since most child abuse is perpetrated by women, we need to focus exclusively on female perpetrators of child abuse. The burden of …	/r/MensRights	30/06/11 07:16 AM
1	Why is this kind of man-bashing and sexism considered okay as a top headline? If this article said anything bad about women, the writer would probably get fired. I don't get it. This is entirely and utterly false. Larry Summers was publicly lynched because he suggested that just maybe the reason not as many women as men are in the sciences is because maybe men have a more innate ability for it. Women screamed "chauvanist", "misogynist", etc. If Summers had said the opposite, few people would have batted an eye. This is just one example. In the modern age, women are FAR more sensitive to criticism than men. Interesting. He was lynched because up until the age of around 1…	/r/MensRights	16/06/11 05:01 AM
2	Dear god, I hate stuff like this. (first post) Employers did not create the condition for those athletes either. They were forced into it by a federal court decision, brought about by a lawsuit from female reporters demanding entry to male locker rooms. Thus, it is very much a legal battle (although a social one as well). Moreover I have little sympathy for the poor female reporters. I'm pretty sure not being allowed in men's locker rooms is not going to have a massive effect on female employment, including in journalism where women have bee…	/r/MensRights	04/06/11 04:24 PM
0	Dear god, I hate stuff like this. (first post) No, there isn't. In fact, there's a good argument that being examined by a doctor of the opposite sex is less bothersome than being forced to shower, change clothes, etc. with members of the opposite sex pushing into your private space. I know I'd definitely prefer the former situation.	/r/MensRights	04/06/11 04:19 PM
8	Dear god, I hate stuff like this. (first post) Your argument is a strawman, as it doesn't address the fact that equal employment opportunities is the reason for allowing female reporters in male lockers room, and you're attempting to justify it by re-framing it as an issue of alleged, and arguably irrelevant, financial compensation, through which you exclude (and thus, dismiss) the issue of giving equal opportunities for male gynecologists - an issue that needs to be addressed just as much as equal opportunities for female reporters.	/r/MensRights	04/06/11 12:46 PM
42	Dear god, I hate stuff like this. (first post) Funny. When female reporters want to enter male athletes' locker rooms, even if those athletes are uncomfortable with it, the clinching argument is that banning female reporters would deny women "equal employment opportunities". But when female patients are uncomfortable with male gynecologists, denying male gynecologists equal opportunity is irrelevant - female patients' comfort is all that matters. Heads women win, tails men lose.	/r/MensRights	04/06/11 06:17 AM
2	History shows that all-boy classrooms might actually benefit girls In contrast, a more recent study had opposite results (for English, at least): Boys 'better at English in single-sex classes'	/r/MensRights	02/06/11 07:38 AM
1	Would you for for a MALE-aligned Political Party? Yes, I most likely would vote for a male-aligned political party. Lord knows most major political parties are female-aligned to begin with.	/r/MensRights	15/05/11 06:30 AM
-1	Refute, don't downvote! Dastardly Dads: "Fathers Rights folks blame moms for child abuse. WRONG! Sexual abuse, shaken baby syndrome, and other forms of violent child abuse are dominated by dads, stepdads, and caretaker boyfriends (60 - 90%)." Three points: This post was in response to someone who claimed men/fathers were the majority of perpetrators. This study shows that claim is false. The study included boyfriends and step-fathers, not just biological parents. Thus your comparison does not really tell us about the rate of abuse as a function of opportunity. (Notice the study said that female perpetrators were significantly older than the male ones, which generally isn't the case in families where both parents are biological parent…	/r/MensRights	25/03/11 04:06 PM
5	Refute, don't downvote! Dastardly Dads: "Fathers Rights folks blame moms for child abuse. WRONG! Sexual abuse, shaken baby syndrome, and other forms of violent child abuse are dominated by dads, stepdads, and caretaker boyfriends (60 - 90%)." In Shaken Baby Syndrome, Women as Likely to be Perpetrators as Men	/r/MensRights	24/03/11 01:43 PM
5	"Money safer in women's hands" "Mums are more than twice as likely to raid their children's savings than dad"	/r/MensRights	06/03/11 03:31 PM
3	Males have been oppressed throughout the ages, THIS is the reason for the MRM " I don't see myself as "disposable" ... I don't want my girlfriend or my sister getting drafted into the military. " Apparently, you do see yourself, as well as other males, as more disposable than the females in your life.	/r/MensRights	15/01/11 09:38 AM
2	Feminism and some views on the draft. They want rights first and obligatons only after women control everything. Her argument is the typical feminist modus operandi: falsely portray men as having most of the power, falsely blame men for everything, and then use that to justify female privileges. When women are prevented from being elected, or when women are prevented from voting for female politicians, or voting at all, they can blame men for the lack of female "representation". It is women's fault, and ONLY women's fault, that most elected officials are men. Basically, what they're saying is that women sh…	/r/MensRights	02/12/10 08:26 AM