TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

robertfrostt Archive

View 12 posts and 487 comments by robertfrostt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
105

Discussionrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 04:31 PM
75

Discussionrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 04:43 AM
64

CMVrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 12:54 AM
44

CMVrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 04:33 PM
36

Discussionrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 12:15 AM
15

Discussionrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:21 PM
13

CMVrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 05:30 AM
11

CMVrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 06:02 AM
6

robertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:45 AM
3

Question For Menrobertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 05:13 PM
1

robertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:18 PM
0

robertfrostt/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 05:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It doesn’t matter. Matt wasn’t criminally punished for his crimes, and the user I responded to was trying to argue since most rapists aren’t prosecuted, men have nothing to worry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 08:52 PM
3

Are you in denial of the MeToo movement? https://variety.com/2017/biz/news/matt-lauer-accused-sexual-harassment-multiple-women-1202625959/ On Wednesday, NBC announced that Lauer was fired from “Today.” It was a stunning move for a co-host who was widely considered the crown jewel of the network’s news division, with a $25 million annual salary. The cause of his dismissal, according to sources, was a detailed complaint from another current NBC employee about inappropriate sexual conduct from Laue…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 05:04 PM
2

Stop using “guilt” and “innocence” outside of courtrooms. That's the media's idea, not mine. People have always “thought others” were whatever You are being obtuse here. No where before in history did the media believe women, without evidence, that they were raped or assaulted by a man to the degree they do now. Hell, the media even allows women with book deals to accuse the president of sexual assault without evidence to up her sales https://bookriot.com/2019/06/25/e-jean-carroll-writes-that-do…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 04:57 PM
1

Don't play stupid, you seemed puzzled why men seem frightened of the consequences of rape when most are not tried. A woman claiming she was raped can ruin a man's career forever. Some people still believe Aziz is guilty of sexual misconduct.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 04:44 PM
4

MOST ppl don’t go to the police when they’ve been raped. And even then most accused rapists aren’t convicted or even tried — burden of proof is difficult and it’s not top priority for over burdened precincts; lots of rape kits are never analyzed. And even then most convicted rapists don’t get severe jail time. That doesn't matter because the method of punishing those accused of rape has shifted during MeToo. There doesn't need to be a trial or hearing or anything, a woman just goes to the media.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 04:40 PM
4

physical interaction people share. All touch does. Holding hands, snuggling on the couch, spontaneous kisses, head scritches, nuzzling, shared grooming, caresses - all of these things are part of affirmations of love and appreciation. These are still sexual or sensual. Basically anything a woman wouldn't do with a guy who was only a friend is to some degree sexual. You are correct though love is also created outside strictly of the bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 02:10 AM
2

In the past, and through friends, I have found a richer man dating a foreign poor woman is the best combo that creates the most attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 03:15 PM
1

BUT - I think from talking to my friends this is just a sexist relic that will hopefully go away with the increased financial power of women. They feel that if a guy doesn’t pay, he doesn’t actually value her or like her very much. Definitely won't. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/rich-women-like-rich-men-and-rich-men-like-slender-women-2015-09-28 Men with higher incomes showed stronger preferences for women with slender bodies, while women with higher incomes preferred men who had a steady in…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 01:13 AM
1

It does mean she's a sex object. A sex object would be true if she can't use sex to get what she wants. ​ you've got a problem admitting it to yourself in the second paragraph. Bit of mental gymnastics there Ill ignore your personal attack, Studies show men are less likely to choose high earning, highly intelligent women. https://www.indy100.com/article/what-men-think-women-smart-intelligence-sexy-psychology-study-iq-science-maths-love-relationships-7954646 ​ https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 05:45 AM
1

Sexy women have more power over men and women then powerful yet ugly or average women do. Men will always and forever give more attention and devotion to a sexy woman than a powerful woman. This doesn’t mean a woman is a sex object. It just means men are drawn to feminine qualities, and not masculine ones in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 02:44 PM
1

Why the hell would you ant to do that. Some feminists are really feminists to justify being sluts, and are incredible to have sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 04:41 AM
2

Because feminism makes claims about what men should or should not do when interacting with women "Men shouldn't talk to women in coffee shops" https://medium.com/dose/why-its-not-okay-for-men-to-talk-to-women-in-coffee-shops-75aaf89d7d99 ​ https://jezebel.com/how-to-talk-to-a-woman-without-being-a-creep-5981581 ​ > Chances are that you'll be shot down, so be prepared for that. You interrupted someone's day, plain and simple, if they respond negatively, the only thing you can do is sincerely apol…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 04:34 AM
1

Well I am trying to introduce them to s better life. I call it the status pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 04:54 PM
0

Because..... many white males travel to eastern countries for sex tourism or finding a girlfriend ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 04:23 PM
1

Also https://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv It’s a 1 in 1,250 chance of getting HIV from a person who is positive for it. That means your knowingly having sex with someone you know has it, who may or may not be on anti retroviral therapy. So the chance of getting it from a person that may or may not have it is far less.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 01:36 PM
1

You are confusing transmission and infection. Anti-retroviral therapy does not at all block the virus from being able to infect other cells or disable its ability to infect. It’s not an immunity. It just lowers the amount of the virus detectable in the blood. If you happen to skip a dose by accident or have sex during a period with more viral load, the risk is still the same as someone not taking the medication. And even so the general rate of HIV transmission for heterosexual sex is very very l…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 01:31 PM
1

Anti-retrovrial drugs suppress the ability of HIV to transition into AIDS. They have no effect on the immunity or infectious ability of the virus to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 01:18 PM
2

https://markmanson.net/std-guide This is a really honest guide about std’s Also most people have hepatitis B vaccinations.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 12:38 PM
1

As I said, the risk is essentially zero for heterosexuals , assuming no open cuts or sores are around the mouth or in the genitals. If you don’t believe me : https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2533066 They studied close to 1,000 HIV couples with one positive one negative partner. After two years of condomless sex, there were no transmission between the couples at all. And that also includes unprotected vaginal sex. The risk of std’s are blown way out of the water in the media.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 12:20 PM
0

There is literally no risk of getting an std from a blow job. Like literally none.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 11:43 AM
1

Yea you should try Cambodia or Thailand, way better than what your saying sounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 07:42 AM
1

The women I know would rather pay their own way than feel obligated to reciprocate if the guy paid. Sounds like you haven't went on a date with a Chinese girl before ;) In China and some other Asian cultures, being able to pay the bill for others is very important because it shows you have the wealth and power to protect and provide for others.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 07:41 AM
1

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 07:41 AM
1

Theres virtually no relevant secxual contact because of the stds - we wont kiss, i cant lick her, she will only blow me with condom May I ask what country is this? I have used escorts in SE Asia, Hong Kong, China, Macau, and Taiwan, and never heard that you can't kiss or have a bare back bj with any of them at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 07:31 AM
8

Legal or not, it's ego crushing knowing that the only way to get a woman to have sex with you is if you directly pay her. It's basically an admission of how low value you are as a man if paying for sex is the only way you're having sex. This is an American idea only. In other countries, being able to afford and provide for women via prostitution or otherwise just being rich is a central idea of sexual attraction. In China and HK men who can get regular girlfriends or a wife also use prostitutes …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 07:29 AM
-1

Its about the shame and embarrassment of being unwanted and unloved. So using an escort actually adds to that feeling. But it doesn't. I don't know about the US but escorts in Asia make you feel like they want it and truly like you. They give you compliments and make it like a porno fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 07:27 AM
1

our concentration camps? The border camps are not concentration camps. You by definition cannot have a concentration camp where you enter it by free will and exit it by free will.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:49 AM
1

The birth rate has dropped in every country that has a higher standard of living, lower infant mortality rate, and better access to education and careers for women. The birth rate has nothing to do with the sexual market place. The SMP only involves the ease of sexual relationships and encounters prior to getting married.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:46 AM
1

Are we talking chatting in bars or clubs? Or everyday activities? That would be detrimental information here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:35 AM
1

No men dont "owe that to women", but if she charges him with rape that's a problem for him isnt it Well there is a legal basis for that form of fraud, so it should be the same for men paying dinners for women. Do you have a disorder that makes you not be able to tell the differences between things? Claiming people are mentally ill when they have a different opinion is a pretty low form of debate. I think you can do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:28 AM
1

There is no comparison between what I said and physically drugging people. Does someone have a reason to rely on other people giving them alcoholic drinks? If I give you a drink at a party, can you legally rely on that drink being clean?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:27 AM
2

if there is any possibility of attraction, you can make it happen whether her intention was a free meal or not Nope Women place outings and situations into contexts. Unless a woman is already infatuated or enamored by you (which does not apply in this discussion), you cannot simply create attraction out of thin air in one sitting. If a woman does not see a man in any romantic or sexual way, and he tries to make a move, he will be labeled creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 05:06 AM
2

The whole thing is about when a woman knows she has no interest and no receptivity to interest and is just a free meal knowing he has no chance. Exactly, people here are confusing the linked study to being rejected on the first date, which is totally different.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 05:03 AM
3

When a girl agrees to go on a date with you she dosen't know if she wants to fuck you or not. Shes giving you the oportunity to try to seduce her. No, disagree. If a girl agrees to a date, where it's known that the outing is in fact a date, the girl at minimum sees you in a *potential* sexual context. There are already some thoughts about intimacy or sex or what you might do on the date. Girl's don't agree to dates with guys that are sexually invisible to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 05:02 AM
3

no one "Deserves" "honesty" in dating strangers. By that logic it should be ok to put drugs in a girls drink. We need to expect some form of honesty from other people, and that should be equal for men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 05:00 AM
3

no one owes anyone anything in "dating" So in the same respect, it would be true men don't owe women anything in sex. a man should not have to check in on a woman during sex to see if he still has consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 04:43 AM
2

with or debating whether I feel like a second date with someone the guy offering dinner has an advantage. Not enough of an advantage to get me to go out with him if I think he's hideous and/or awful, but definitely an advantage. Wait, but does "advantage" mean you feel validated or like the idea he offers dinner? Like does it seem charming? Or are you saying "advantage" because it's at least a free meal?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 12:26 AM
1

If you can't get them into bed without paying food for them you need to develop your personality and learn seduction skills. That's an American idea. In asian cultures the man's ability to earn big money is much more valued and prized.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 12:12 AM
1

The equivalent would be calling a lawyer because Chad pumped and dumped me. What are your thoughts on feminists doing this all the time toward the media rather than the lawyer?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 12:11 AM
1

These are all female behaviors. Men don't feel sexy in the same way women do. Men can feel powerful or confident in response to their actions succeeding in certain activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:57 PM
1

Who cares what they think? Well if you want to get them into bed and have sex, you kind of have to see what they think about some stuff.....
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:55 PM
3

No, Gelato is prepared entirely different than American ice cream. ​ It's stirred and mixed with lighter cream and lighter milk, and is overall softer.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:53 PM
1

It’s still embarrassing to snitch that a girl used you. Well wouldn't snitching to a court that a man doesn't pay child support also embarrassing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:52 PM
5

Buddy, any attractive woman with half a brain cell already knows whoever is taking her out just wants to bang. I don't agree with this. Back in college, I noticed women sometimes have an invisibility toward men they don't see sexually. Some guys would ask girls to coffee or tea, but then the girls would bring their books and computer and truly thought they just wanted to study together.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:50 PM
5

even when i'm out on a date type thing, i'll tell the girl i'm with to go flirt and ask for drinks from thirsty betas. most of these idiots will also buy me a drink when a girl asks them. Now that's straight out of a RP fantasy field report.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:49 PM
3

Don't go for dinner at the first date. What if a woman expects it? Like if she thinks coffee is too cheap?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:48 PM
1

Wouldn’t it be embarrassing to snitch to the court if a woman rejected you? But this isn't a rejection, I think you are not getting it. The idea is from the start the only reason she goes on the date is for the food. We aren't counting situations where the guy didn't do well or screwed up the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:46 PM
0

Not really, if someone offers you free food, why not? It's NOT free, it's given on the basis you have sexual or romantic interest in the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:44 PM
2

But what if women think a guy is weird for not paying for her ? I have dated a lot of Korean and Chinese girls when i was younger, and most of them thought if guy doesn't pay he is a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:43 PM
1

Are we not allowed to call men cheap anymore? As long as you are romantically or sexually interested in them, it's ok to expect men to pay for stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 11:42 PM
1

Pretty much yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 06:40 PM
8

Says common sense. Women need to abide by honesty or they don’t deserve honest treatment themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 05:59 PM
0

No because your situation does not involve a purchase. If a woman promises time back at her place after a date, but also insists the man has to pay, the man has a reasonable idea to rely on the woman to go back to her place. Btw I have heard feminists saying that not using a condominium when you say you are is fraudulent consent. So this should count too
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 05:56 PM
0

What if the woman states that she and the man can go back to her place after the date for Netflix and chill? But then leaves after the food is paid for. I’m very sure that’s fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 05:16 PM
2

It is not right now, but the question is should it be?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 05:13 PM
3

It’s paternity fraud when a woman claims the child she carries is her husband but is in fact another man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 05:12 PM
0

Well it could be the legal one too. Similar to how paternity fraud isn’t considered a crime in some countries but has legal basis in others
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 05:00 PM
5

Do you not see that guys aren’t going on dates just to pay someone’s dinner? They kind of want some action too.....
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 04:51 PM
4

Misrepresentation of self. It would be the same as someone agreeing to clean your house but ends up not cleaning anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 04:51 PM
-1

I forget that there are people who think sex is more important than being a decent human being, but I guess that's why we've got rapists. Not following here, are you claiming being a decent human being makes you worthy of sex? That's nice guy tm right there
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 04:15 AM
7

Wow. That is an eye opening answer. Social media is destroying our ability to form relationships by basically hacking our egos. Another effect I have seen is it also seems to curve the idea of fun and exciting toward clubs/parties/drugs rather than non night-life related scenarios. Young people are only posting pictures of themselves at some rave, party, or music festival. There is a lot of appreciation for general hobbies or outings being depreciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 06:39 PM
12

I would think modern advances in communication and networking, Nope On the contrary, social media gives regular girls an avenue to an immense stream of validation. An ordinary girl who isn't fat and young can post pics of herself in a bikini or in workout clothes and get hundreds or thousands of likes for it an instagram, and tons of people and men commenting saying she is absolutely beautiful. This was not possible before social media. The very idea that someone who is not a movie star or profe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 05:55 PM
1

What do you mean I don't count as a career woman?!? In Silicon Valley, being a software engineer as a woman does not indicate an increased or extraordinary effort put towards your career in life. AKA it's not out of the normal for a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 07:24 AM
1

Chad should be a man whom is significantly more attractive than the men he is competing against in his social circle. ​ An average-above average guy in California can very well be a chad in China.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 08:14 PM
1

Bigger dicks make men more sexually attractive. Just like height, frame, etc. Think of it this way, most men, probably 90% like a big ass, or big boobs. But most men are also not with a woman with either. The same goes for dicks. Most women might be interested in a big dick, but it doesn't mean they won't enjoy a range of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 08:06 PM
1

A short guy with an average dick and a poor frame won't be sexually attractive no matter what he does emotionally. It's pretty clear here you believe short guys are screwed no matter what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 08:02 PM
1

What your forgetting though is a man's competition. Women judge men almost instantly of how big or strong they might be and how that relates to if they feel the man is masculine. Meaning, if you are considerably less muscular or less buff than the group of men she is friends with or hangs out with, you will be less visible to her or non visible. ​ Based off what you said: The rebellious badboy, the intriguing traveller living off his trust fund, the party boy who may well die at 30, the handsome…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 04:05 PM
1

I was on the train going to and past certain areas with a higher Muslim population. Is that in America? Here in California all the muslims i know are super rich, either from Dubai or Saudi Arabia
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 07:16 AM
1

seriously some muslim dude was being all aggressive and stole another guys charger. Is this like a refugee ? Never heard of this happening before with regular muslims
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 03:16 AM
1

Just be yourself and you will attract the kind of girl who is right for you at that time in your life. I think this is where the disconnect is. ​ Men might be naturally lazy, unconfident, and fearful to sexually escalate. They might be fat, out of shape, or a boring person. This might not match up with the kind of woman they would get without any effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 08:00 PM
1

Predictably, it's all of the super liberal casual sex people who are voting for tats. Are you surprised by this? LOL. Enjoy your floozies bro. Go get some tats. Well in this sub that's what being attractive entails..... getting casual sex. That's TRP idea. If you are only attributing fatherhood and long term relationships toward being attractive you are going to be an outlier here. ​ Also 35% means at least a half sleeve. for any visible tattoo at all it's more like 50%
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 03:37 PM
2

Tattoos are neutral to a turn off LOL especially the amount that guy has. What kinda dumbasses post here FFS to think that tattoos especially of that size are a general positive except to a small handful of people who really like them? https://www.askmen.com/news/dating/having-tattoos-leads-to-more-sex-study-finds.html https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188691631087X Here we report the results of a large population-based study, where photos of real, non-tattooed men were digit…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 06:32 AM
1

The black guy with the high life shirt is definitely above average, he's buff, big chest, has tattoos, is pretty tall, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 05:09 AM
1

It's not just the girl, but also the situation. Porn is way too easy, guys just walks in and gets his dick sucked. Not happening in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 08:52 PM
1

1000 a day? For an average woman? You people are truly delusional. Look up videos of girls showing how many matches they get in tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 07:31 PM
1

Uhh the claim was high profile female criminals, not serial killers, or even murderers. A serial killer or murderer is by virtue a high profile criminal. You are the one who provided Casey Anthony as an example. If you intend to supply examples of non-homicidal criminals that are female, please do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 07:29 PM
3

The article doesn't provide any evidence that pornography raises men's standards of attractiveness. If you are less likely to be satisfied by non porn encounters because of watching porn, that means porn raised your standards of sexual appeal and attraction. I mean its not reasonable to believe sexual satisfaction has no relationship to what one finds attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 07:27 PM
3

Men and women both tend to experiment in college. Women have more opportunity to do so, if you have ever heard of 3 to 1 or 2 to 1 female to male ratios at parties. Also young women are having more sex than men of the same age https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/lpPQCfvc6yMX_dmg3r67e7h6Foc=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/4C7SSBIXSNFCLOJIGCWUOKDYTY.png
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 05:48 PM
6

https://www.webmd.com/sex/news/20170512/study-sees-link-between-porn-and-sexual-dysfunction#1 Young men who prefer pornography to real-world sexual encounters might find themselves caught in a trap, unable to perform sexually with other people when the opportunity presents itself, a new study reports.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 05:46 PM
3

The difference is that men are not under the illusion that they could fuck a woman that looks like a pornstar. A lot of man raise their standards of what looks attractive based on porn though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 04:45 PM
1

It's because the serial killers that do get love letters, display a strong sense of rebellion and intention in their anti-establishment thought patterns. It's likely a woman's primal instinct to seek men who have the guts to do what they want. Something I have noticed: The completely random shooters, such as the vegas shooter, and others where no real motive is seen or understood, don't seem to garner the love letters. It's ones more about their psychology, ted bundy, charles manson, etc, that d…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 04:24 PM
1

This was from a quick Google search about Casey Anthony. A serial killer murders multiple people in a *series* of murders. Casey is a murderer, not a serial killer.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 04:20 PM
2

High profile female criminals also get love letters, marriage proposals, and offers for help from weird dudes. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 04:18 PM
3

How psychology is a bullshit degree? He is probably confusing psychology or sociology.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 04:16 PM
4

They also assume that every woman would go on a CC if they go to uni The CC is over exaggerated, but most women who are born in America do have a phase in college where they let loose and party and experiment with casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 04:15 PM
2

I agree with you but you haven't seen the disdain for "career women" Warning, that can mean different things in different places. In Silicon Valley "career" woman means like a super charged business woman type, investment banker, or a surgeon. Think tech founder, executive, scientist. It means more a woman who chooses a rather time consuming and dedicated career where the majority of her focus is on her career. A general software engineer wouldn't be a "career" woman because they still largely l…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 04:12 PM
1

I disagree. ​ TRP isn't really intended to make men financially successful. They don't state it as a goal or core component of being alpha. In many ways they emphasize a core component of the American dating/hookup scene, the idea of being attractive because one is rich is getting less and less prevalent among women. As more socially progressive politics and individualism culture flourish, being attractive is more in line with being buff, ripped, and socially entertaining. ​ If TRP's goal was to…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 01:44 PM
1

Her book deal is aside her accusation. You are reaching a conclusion to the origin of her accusation that is not fact based. The fact is she has a book deal with contains a scene Donald Trump himself. That is factual. The burden of proof to say she didn't make the accusation to increase her book sales is on you. That is your claim, not mine. The source for meeting Trump is a photo of them together. If you are talking about "facts" please source that photo and proof whomever is in that photo is i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 02:03 PM
1

He doesn’t strike me as anything less than above average-looking. If I saw them out in public together, I wouldn’t think twice. Ok, but do you get how a man's looks and appearance aren't judged in the straight aesthetic way a woman is? A man's appearance is more judged how it makes a woman feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 06:23 AM
1

Face > height & personality Does that pic i linked show a stereotypical handsome guy? no.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 02:19 AM
2

The truth is face and height alone aren't strong markers of masculinity. Shy guys who are 6 feet don't get laid as much as guys who are 5'10", work out, have tattoos, and are edgy/confident. ​ Here's a great example. This IG model i follow, her boyfriend is only 5'7" or so and has grey hair, but she views him as chad https://www.instagram.com/p/BxOW-zYhypo/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 11:12 PM
1

domestic violence etc seem to a bigger problem in working class communities, where people in general are less attractive on average due to not having the resources to take care themselves? Men primarily only need a gym and the right food and supplements to take care of themselves. Most of the people I meet at 24 hour fitness make 5x as less as I do, like some don't even have steady jobs. ​ If anything domestic violence is more common in working class communities due to lack of stability in incom…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 11:08 PM
5

work in a domestic violence shelter and she would counsel tons of abused women. Domestic violence shelters are for women who have literally run away from home because they fear physical harm and their safety. That's very different than just being an asshole and cheating. Pretty much not related at all. these guys are as far as way as looking like a stereotypical Chad as possible. What is a stereotypical chad to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 11:05 PM
1

Doesn't apply in this case since it presupposes a motivation Her book deal and publishing a book is evidence of a motivation to go public with the accusation. Just like when congress questioned if Michael Cohen had a conflict of interest telling them what he did since he didn't promise not to take on any book deals. Also evidence here is at least neutral. No evidence of Trump raping here either. ll we have is an accusation and the fact that Trump lied about never having met this person. Source f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 03:44 PM
1

I definitely 100% prefer option B. hourglass, wide hips, big butt, absolute favorite. ​ My fiance is Chinese but she is from the southern guangzhou region so she is more curvy/round than what you might think of.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 06:24 PM
1

You should talk to the New York Times or CNN. You got a pay check waiting for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 06:21 PM
1

Of course there is an obvious correlation. The same person was involved in each. Why on earth does that matter? Two separate scenarios with two separate victims do not influence the truth of one another. I would really brush up on some law or statistics https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/disjoint-events/ That's the legal standard to throw someone in jail. It's not the standard for us to believe that he actually did it, nor is it the standard necessary to not vote someone for pres…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 06:20 PM
1

The more people who come forward with similar stories increases each one's credibility. No that's a logical fallacy. If each individual person had a separate circumstance they witnessed, there is no correlation between the circumstances. A witness to one crime scene has no bearing on the guilt of someone accused by a different victim. Now, if there are multiple witnesses or victims for the same crime, then what you are saying is correct. And that's what happened in some of the metoo cases, there…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 03:15 AM
2

You obviously know there is a difference between lying about something that actually happened to you and believing something false that you have no direct knowledge of. The principle is the same. The amount of people who claim something is true has no bearing on it's actual truth. Same can be said for religious miracles or seeing jesus. 20 people claiming to have met jesus in the present day does not further validate what they are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 11:28 PM
0

no one allows or doesnt allow anything "in the social environment" she wrote a book about HER life making claims about things that happened TO her. No, the excerpt accusing Trump of the rape was published by the New York Magazine. Also a publisher has to agree to publish a book.....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 09:35 PM
3

Simply because the odds of 17 unrelated women lying about something like this are extremely low. So, thousands of people, who voted for Trump, believe that Obama founded ISIS, literally https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/11/politics/donald-trump-hugh-hewitt-obama-founder-isis/index.html That must mean it's true right? Why would thousands of people lie? In this case, no, given that she also accuses several other men in the book who have nothing to do with politics. (Obviously I haven't read the book and…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 09:33 PM
0

the OP said "should they be allowed" Apologies, ​ By "allowed" I do not mean legally. I mean in a social environment. It's very clear that any such major magazine or news outlet is very open and would never question a woman making such an allegation against trump or other political figures. The social environment, gives them big access to do this
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 09:23 PM
2

Due to the fact that her upcoming book is about disposing of males, this is a person who is mentally unstable at best and a slimy manipulative dirtbag, considering this coincides with these allegations, at worst. Yea, its amazing to me how some comments here completely disregard her political stance and view it as benign.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 09:20 PM
2

But then you also have to count that she's the 17th woman to come forward with something like this so it adds to her credibility. Why would the amount of people, sans evidence of say payoffs or written confessions, mean anything? I don't believe Harvey would have been brought down if the people around him or the payoffs were not discovered or brought up and confirmed. The money she stands to gain probably doesn't outweigh the negatives, especially when she's already successful and well known. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 09:17 PM
2

I don't even like trump,but this is the worst way to try him down. A crazy radfem, who just released her book, makes accusations against him 25 years later when it's impossible to prove one way or the other, especially at a time when there's backlash and criticism over the way accusations are handled. So you agree that such a scenario hurts the reputation of women who were truly raped and want to come forward about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 09:14 PM
-1

I mosied over to r/askmen and searched for posts asking MEN what they find attractive in WOMEN. Examples: 1 2 3 /u/MellifluousMaple , you realize the examples you found are in a post asking about *traits* right? Traits are most often behaviors and not really about lust or physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 06:47 AM
12

http://i.imgur.com/VBW3viW.jpg ​ An actual reddit meetup
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 06:45 AM
3

no, a "spark" is when a woman feels chemistry with a man and he acts on his desires in the right way that the woman perceives as confident. ​ Physical attraction is judged before a date happens. Men are the one's that relate spark to physical attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 03:56 AM
1

I said that being around the other person shouldn't feel like work. In my mind there is a difference. ooohhhhh ok thats makes a lot more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 11:57 PM
2

It's worked well for me so far! In the sense you are ok being single or in the sense you found a relationship that takes no work and is exciting 24/7?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 11:24 PM
2

Being with the other person never feels like work. You can both see a future and find nothing there to dread, just excitement. That's an unrealistic standard for a relationship. Moreover, it's rather unrealistic for life as a whole. Any relationship takes work in some periods when differences come up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 09:26 PM
1

a bad or even a "meh" relationship is faaaaaar worse than no relationship at all. What would be the difference between a bad relationship and a relationship that is generally good but has some bad times? ​ Basically, if we are not both crazy about each other, I am not interested. What does crazy mean here?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 07:41 PM
6

I can afford to be pickier than ever. By picky, do you mean in terms of looks and wealth? ​ I feel one difference with older women is they seem more into just being handsome and fit and less about being a bad boy or edgy. I have found older women seem to find me more intriguing than younger women do. I am 29 for reference.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 07:37 PM
12

How did we get to a point where Men don't realize the words coming out of a guys mouth can make a girl go from 100 to 0 real quick? Because feminism frames female consent as binary as male consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:12 PM
1

but it’s a standard adopted by many institutions of higher education. I think that's more affirmative consent, I have seen enthusiastic used more by feminist or SA organizations If men want to ensure their future success and not be removed from school, the least amount of gambling is to always have enthusiastic consent for any sexual contact and to ask for that consent from a trusted long term partner. Nope. You are claiming that getting enthusiastic consent protects you from false rape accusati…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 04:18 PM
1

Enthusiastic consent is not a legal standard so I don’t get your idea here? Most people also do not express enthusiastic consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 03:29 PM
1

Did you not read the OP? Enthusiastic consent is a small, feminist standard of consent compared to pragmatic, literal consent. You need to check if a girl is in the mood or accepting of your advances before you go further with touching, that’s consent. But no woman is jumping up and down like “OMG TOUCH MY ASS TOUCH MY ASS”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 03:05 PM
2

Because sexual impulses quite often lead people to pair up with destructive partners. Far too many women wind up single mothers because of this, and too many men get destroyed by sticking their dick in crazy. Fair enough, but it seems from the OP's other comments he is talking about sexual libido or desires as a whole, not just reckless sexual impulses.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 07:18 AM
2

I’m saying you could raise a child with someone, share frustrations and successes with someone, and have that be a unique an intimate thing on its own that strengthens the pair totally independent of sexuality. If this was true dead bedrooms wouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 05:20 AM
2

I want to find someone that I could share a life with. A best friend. Call that dating, friendship makeing, solemate searching, whatever you want. I feel like sexual attraction more often hurts this than aides it. Well you aren't wrong. Sexual desires do cloud the idea of friendships, but a best friend and a spouse have nothing to do with one another. It's like apples and oranges. I think this is where you are going wrong. For example, I am going to marry a girl I met back in grad school. I ador…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 05:18 AM
4

Is it totally foreign to you that hormones can cloud the mind and prevent you from making rational decisions and choices? A relationship isn't based on rationality. It's based on chemistry, connection, and emotions. No one is attracted to someone or becomes attracted by rationalizing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 05:13 AM
3

I feel that attraction impeeds more often than it helps us to form relationships with a foundation of meaningful friendship. So why are friends at all relevant in a discussion about dating? You don't need to date people to be friends with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 04:59 AM
3

To make your question a bit more interesting, ill answer, what will happen to the world . ​ I believe the economy would crash or we would for sure experience a large recession. Many industries revolve around the desire for sex. So does a lot of tourism. Be it couple getaways or sex tourism. They would experience vast economic difficulties losing a lot of potential customers. Then theres prostitutes themselves. No more customers. Let's also not forget sex companies, like Trojan, companies that ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 04:57 AM
2

Op, I have to ask, did you go to UC Berkeley? This sounds like a textbook definition of my days back in my alma mater :p ​ Your view is wrong because you are confusing "sexually liberated" with third wave feminism. You can be sexually liberated whilst still adhering to a feminine and sweet personality. Asian or latina girls are often examples of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 04:47 AM
1

So touching a woman's breast or ass when she doesn't want them touched is not considered sexual assault? That's a pretty bad attempt at a strawman... Do tell me, where did I say groping doesn't apply to sexual assault? This is gonna be good...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 03:04 AM
1

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sun-men/8739005/glam-gran-tinder-dates-toyboys-desperate-bed-her/ It's very likely this woman manages to do this because she seems extremely sexual and lustful.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 11:21 PM
2

If you can't even be bothered to ask your partner questions as you try to fuck them you generally sound like an awful partner Vast majority of people do not ask before kissing a girl. You either read cues and see if she seems accepting of it or doesn't mind your face getting close with her's etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 09:43 PM
1

If you don’t ask for a kiss in the educational environment, then you are gambling, even if at times the risk is minuscule. Only enthusiastic consent removes risk, although she could potentially lie about giving it. This is why it’s safest to not bother with casual sexual contact at all, with drunk casual sexual contact obviously being the highest risk. Enthusiastic consent applies to actual sex, not kissing or minor touching. It wouldn't really make any sense in terms of kissing because most of …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 09:42 PM
1

You didn’t specify which one is hotter. They would be about the same but option 2 will invest more in her looks and look hotter more of the time than option 1
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 09:33 PM
1

I still don't see why it can't be 20% of the women having 80% of sex ....aka nymphomaniacs Because the demand for women is skewed in the woman's favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 04:11 AM
1

Ignoring the major incel content, ill address this: ​ they think every man want to "spin plates?" and pump and dump til infinity? they really believe every man, even chads, can do this all their life even when 40 to 50 years old? ​ I do think TRP goes overboard with the whole "plate" spinning thing. I do think they exaggerate the degree to which this can be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 04:09 AM
1

Have you ever met a human? Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 04:05 AM
2

500k in Silicon Valley or Bay Area isn’t that much . In a year by year salary it is. The problem is most people count 4+ years of RSU's in one years compensation which makes absolutely no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 04:03 AM
3

Reading your responses I’m less and less sure you know what a CEO is. Honestly I’m not even sure you know what a nurse is That's a really poor attempt at an adhominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 11:57 PM
1

So her being busy and stressed actually isn’t the problem here? It’s why she’s busy and stressed? Well, yes. I don't want a woman who devoted her life to being the boss of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 11:33 PM
0

ellen pao is 50 years old. line her up against 100 other 50 year old women and she would be top in attractiveness by virtue of not being obese alone She sues people for false reports of gender discrimination. It's literally dangerous to even be known by her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 11:32 PM
1

Sigh, like most click bait news articles, that guy is counting his bonuses and stocks inside of his salary • Salary: 175k • Relocation/Signing Bonus: It's been a while. • Stock and/or recurring bonuses: 300-325k • Total comp: 475-500k That isn't a yearly stock amount. Those are always RSU's which vest over a period of 4 years. You can't usually vest any until about 1 year into working for the company. Bonuses are tied to company and personal performance. They aren't guaranteed. Im an engineer an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 10:12 PM
1

but the cosmetic procedures thing made me chose the CEO instead. Why? That doesn't mean a super fake look, it just means things to improve appearance, like cool sculpting, botox, skin treatments, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 10:08 PM
1

your trolling
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:49 PM
3

I met a natural alpha (future alpha bucks) who didn't feel hookups were worth the effort or risk. He valued meaningful relationships more, but still got him high RMV women. Is spinning plates just a compensating tactic former "beta's" use to validate themselves, thereby confirming that they need the validation and have not escaped their beta mentality? Something I have noticed is that, to get really hot girls, you ultimately have to have some sort of a relationship. As in the 9/10, big boobs, bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:37 PM
0

CEOs just sit in an office all day long, if they're not out playing golf or taking three-martini lunches. That would apply more for a general CEO. The reason i specified the tech silicon valley CEO is because it involves being feminist etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:30 PM
1

Right....the engineers make that much. Not at all. Almost no SI engineer makes over $250,000 consistently and if they are valued correctly. The few who have such high salaries are extremely specialized and have distinguished themselves in specific companies. They are known as super engineers. or 10x engineers.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:29 PM
1

i would love for you to point towards these female CEOs (especially ones of dating age) who "don't wear makeup" and only wear "business clothes"....especially when a lot of them are made from the beauty and fashion industries Ellen Pao is a great example
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:28 PM
1

Who the fuck wants a clueless barista for a life partner? Most men prefer women who aren't smarter than they are themselves. This is shown in studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:26 PM
0

She's 61 years old. The nurse described in the OP isn't going to look anywhere near as good when she's 61. She's overweight and has a short haircut. 61 year olds can still take care of their appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:24 PM
1

You cant ask a question like this without mentioning what they look like. If the CEO doesnt work our chances are she is quite overweight. Well what about Ellen Pao? Not overweight but very feminist and aggressive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins The CEO is likely a manipulative bitch with sociopathic traits. But thats not a guarantee. It's a very, very likely guarantee. You are giving it way too much benefit of the doubt. When I run my speed dating group I have met several st…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:23 PM
2

I'd go for the CEO. Smart women are freaking HOT!!! This is a false correlation. A CEO is a business person. One does not need at all to be intellectually or IQ smart to be a CEO.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 09:00 PM
1

Why do you think a nurse wouldn’t be busy or stressed? They wouldn't be busy or stressed in the same way a CEO would. Ultimately a nurse's job is to support the doctor's orders and to aid and comfort a patient, while making sure their meds and fluids are taken care of. Being stressed about supporting and nurturing is good. A CEO is all about business and being the boss. Being stressed and busy about decision making and managing people is a masculine trait and a complete turn off in a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 08:59 PM
1

Furthermore, there isn't a female CEO anywhere who doesn't care about her appearance. In what way are you measure that? Do you really think this woman cares about her appearance ?? https://moneyinc.com/ross-stores-ceo-barbara-rentler/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 08:57 PM
1

Yup, every reason I gave was a stereotype. I’m ok with that This isn't really stereotyping because you are basing your assessment off a trait someone chose. It's not the same as saying some race does X. If someone chose something, this means there is a thought process behind that decision that does represent who they are to a degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 08:56 PM
1

Stanford educated CEO wins hands down. Are you being sarcastic? What makes you choose such a high earning woman who doesn't wear makeup or care much about appearance ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 08:45 PM
1

I’ve met plenty of CEOs and I’ve met plenty of nurses. What about income?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 08:15 PM
2

Whichever one had less sexual partners Why is that important? What is the one with less partners was less feminine and less interested in sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 08:14 PM
1

you are a man, no? why you even asking? Well its a discussion I am more interested in the degree people assume or don't assume someone's personality based on their profession.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 06:55 PM
8

I'd marry silicon Valley woman for 10 years, divorce her and claim alimony for the rest of my life. best answer so far
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 06:54 PM
5

I mean you left out their entire personality and appearance beyond a few variables so this isn't much to go off. I mean, a stanford educated, CEO tech founder is likely to be vastly, vastly different in personality than a state school educated nurse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 06:53 PM
0

Assuming that neither would cheat or are mentally ill Let's not assume that in this case. Assume that each woman has her own mental difficulties. Such as, the CEO being overly concerned with work and being aggressive or dominant in the work place, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 06:51 PM
2

Women 1 because she sounds more interesting. How much do you make? Would you be concerned about her being very busy or stressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 06:50 PM
1

Meet them both and see which one you have better chemistry with. Its very likely a CEO tech founder is very different than a nurse..... Or rather ask which of them, if any, would date you? So it's dumb to ask men who would they date, but not to ask women who they would? That's pretty sexist and misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 06:49 PM
2

To even be able to form such a violent threat towards him? My gut instinct tells me this is an elaborate troll trying to make feminists look bad. ​ I am not a feminist, but this sounds too perfect to be real.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 06:26 AM
-2

I don’t see anything wrong with killing a man who groped a 10 year old. Do you not see how that would incline the man to commit more crimes to cover it up, like kidnapping her and killing her to cover the evidence? I think you don't get law.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 01:11 AM
0

I see nothing wrong with this. If someone tried to grope me, I'd kill the bastard too if I could. So you would essentially rather spend rest of your life in jail than call the police or file a law suit? ​ This is exactly why I hate western culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 09:52 PM
2

You're scared. Good. So I am guessing you would be fine with a man killing a woman for groping him as well right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 09:30 PM
-1

Better to be "psychotic" than to be a rape victim. This woman is saying men should be killed for one attempt at groping, not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 09:27 PM
1

Some men are pieces of shit. You gotta be willing to if it really comes down, if all else fails, if you've no real option to run or hide or scare them off, to just thoroughly kill them while they aren't paying attention and then take the consequences. Your psychotic
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 06:12 PM
2

promiscuous women, are attention deprived, Again, if they are attention deprived, they want sex and a male to strongly desire her. If she is already deprived of attention she ain't getting it passively then. The guy doesn't have to be mr. super jacked, tank top with bling alpha, just enough to be confident and not hesitant to express how he feels. Women with an abundance of options will choose more alpha men. Also being edgy or alpha is relative to the current demographics. A guy considered bori…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 06:07 PM
8

Nope, you are wrong. You are likely confusing attention seeking women and actual sluts. An actual promiscuous woman has lower standards than other women. She is more open to casual sex and will more easily be open to escalation and diving into bed after a night out. She's likely more flirty, fun, and very open in her behavior. In general they have a lower tendency to call men creepy. ​ However, given the rise of instagram and snapchat, there is another type of woman I call the attention seeker. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 06:45 AM
1

They’re the newsworthy exception, not the rule, to Asian women aging You haven't spent much time around Asian people lol. Guess you don't live in California or a similar area. it's scientifically proven https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772562/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/19 05:58 AM
0

There's no filters you are just jealous
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/19 06:21 PM
0

Asians age like shit. You might wanna check out this: https://www.boredpanda.com/youthful-taiwanese-woman-mother-sisters-lure-fayfay-sharon-hsu/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 11:16 PM
0

Gross. Suit yourself. If you don't wan't a girl who always looks 10-15 years younger thats on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 05:41 PM
6

Lots of women find being taken care of a cop-out of sorts. It’s kind of like how they could never bring themselves to do sex work. Doing sex work implies they have nothing of value to bring to the table more than the objectification of their bodies. This is a very American perspective. If you ever go on a date with a chinese or korean woman better get ready to pay up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 05:08 PM
1

There is a child that is hos biological offspring, not "sex" How did that child get created?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 05:43 PM
1

ok, well then how would you enforce the child support being paid? If a man pays child support he should get access to sex with the woman he is paying child support to. That at least makes it a fair deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 05:44 AM
1

why should court ordered child support be treated differently under the law than any other civil or criminal court order? It's forcing someone to do something because they had sex. It's the equivalent really of marital rape. The man is being forced to hold up his end of the stick.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 05:37 AM
1

My dad was 25 years older than my mom. He contacted her off a listing for expat singles in Hong Kong. lei sik mm sik gong guang dong waa?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 11:17 PM
1

Calling every woman a whore is hating women. Then feminists saying all men are trash or rapists is hating men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 02:14 PM
1

Heck, I get laid too, I just have to pay for it What's wrong with that? Even though I am engaged now when I was working abroad in Hong Kong and Shen Zhen I used prostitutes pretty regularly. It's a lot of fun overseas at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 09:21 PM
1

I'm jealous of the percentage of the percentage of the percentage of men who are getting laid Your in denial of the 60% who are getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 09:14 PM
1

Both demographics are having less overall. The young female celibate percentage is not close to the all time high, while the male one is already well past it. I think you sound very jealous other people are having sex and not you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 09:03 PM
1

So what, you guys are mad that women have preferences instead of just taking any guy that come her way, like some men? I never said I was mad. I am just making a point that by and large the competition a man faces largely determines his success with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 09:01 PM
1

You mean men are not getting laid, https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/lpPQCfvc6yMX_dmg3r67e7h6Foc=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/4C7SSBIXSNFCLOJIGCWUOKDYTY.png women are having more sex than men, at least young people
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:59 PM
1

Why are so many MSM outlets writing about how little sex everyone in this group is having? Is it actually true or is there something else? The consistent part that's true is the rate of men between the ages of 19-30 not having sex within the past year is climbing at an alarming rate, while women are remaining more or less flat. https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/lpPQCfvc6yMX_dmg3r67e7h6Foc=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/4C7SSBIXSNFCLOJIGCWUOKDYTY.png
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:58 PM
1

That's why you'll see men have a 8/10 but yet he is cheating on the side with a chick that is 4/10,5/10. But women don't do this. If a woman goes from a 5/10 guy to an 8/10 guy, she will feel her value is equal to the 8/10 guy and likely not consider a 5/10 guy anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:55 PM
1

> That's a really good way to get free drinks. ​ Are you a man or a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:52 PM
1

the women are just there to get free drinks and have fun. Must be why they dress like this at coachella right? https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FWgcPw4IWWk/hqdefault.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:50 PM
1

Everybody does this you want out on two dates she was not into you and she found somebody else she liked better. Men differ in that they will still have sex with the second choice. Second sentence contradicts the first. The second basically validates my view.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:48 PM
1

Men who experience sexual abundance absolutely do see our standards shift. But if this was true the idea of abundance doesn't even make sense to begin with for men. Think about it. The whole idea of abundance is feeling comforted and secure that if girl A, doesn't work out, you have girl B, girl C, and girl D as well. You can sleep with B one week, C the other week etc. If men shifted their standards, they would never be able to attain abundance, because they would stick more to the top girl and…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:47 PM
1

I'm pretty sure men will do this too. If they are going on multiple dates and one girl is morr interesting, they connect more, share more things then he will next the other girl. But they still value every particular girl the same in terms of sexual pleasure and sleeping with them, that's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:42 PM
1

Also true for prisoners. Guys change their gender preference in the most extreme cases. They just need a warm hole. Do you believe those guys would not fuck their girlfriends outside of prison if given the chance during a visit?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:40 PM
1

if a man starts having an abundance of significantly hotter options, then his standards and expectations will go up. So are you believing a man would pass up a ONS with a 6/10 because he went on a date with an 8/10?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:38 PM
1

It’s like if you went on a date with a chick you vibed with and it was fun and cool but then the girl you been secretly crushing on texts you. Who are you going to focus on more? Likely the one I went on a date with because that's one step closer to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 08:37 PM
1

If I start dating a guy, I’m not going to continue to behave flirty with a guy I went on a couple of dates with. But this is only 1 weeks time difference. I remember in another post it was decided 1 or 2 dates doesn’t indicate monogamy or exlucisveness
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 07:52 PM
1

Basically what I am saying is if a woman says muscles on a guy are gross then ends up dating a muscular guy who works out a lot there is some disconnect between what she says and what she does
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 06:47 PM
1

No, this has actually happened to me, I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. You said “if I” which implies the future. I am saying, your perspective places yourself in a morally correct and superior context. Your assuming things will play out in the moral, fair way. This is noted by your “I am not intentionally being not nice”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 06:25 PM
1

It's not exclusive to who is the most attractive either, if I choose to exclusively date the less attractive person then I would also pull back on the more attractive person I was seeing. I appreciate your perspective but bare in mind you are talking about how the future should play out, which is often wrong. As steve jobs once said, you can't connect the dots looking forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 05:50 PM
3

Or you weren't her type or there was no chemistry. I thought about this but doubt it since we did 69 at the end of the 2nd date. But I have no way of knowing her mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 05:48 PM
1

It may seem like it to him, if I enter a relationship I will likely not have the same relationship with a guy I was in the beginning stages of dating, because at that point I've chosen someone else and am no longer interested in dating other people. You are kind of sugar coating what my view is saying. You want intentionally treat people bad, but your perception and behavior changes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 05:11 PM
1

Men both fuck and date down. Women, by in large, do not. Let me simplify what my view is, A man would not think a 6/10 is any more or less attractive after fucking an 8/10. He wouldn't decline a 6/10 just because he slept with an 8/10 before. Make sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 05:03 PM
-4

Men don't look less attractive when I see someone more attractive. Seeing is not the same as becoming available and dating. You can see Ryan Reynolds in a coffee shop, but unless he offers to go out with you it's not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 05:02 PM
3

Wrong - men have been shown to be more than willing to lower their standards, both for sex and LTRs. Women have not. Standards for attractiveness and standards for sex and relationships is not the same thing. A man can sleep with a woman whom he does not find attractive because he wants to experience sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 04:59 PM
1

when women try to define masculinity. I think he is more saying women define masculinity by whom they find sexually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 04:15 PM
2

Women do not know what masculinity is, but they can certainly feel and assess it socially and psychologically.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 05:06 AM
1

Don't you ever feel "masculine" on your own? I personally have never felt "masculine" as a result of a women's reaction. I wouldn't say women cause me to feel masculine at all. To me it's always related to other men. Achieving things that various men/role models recognize or acknowledge or describe as masculine. I think what /u/MMDT might be saying is that ideas or behaviors cannot arbitrarily become masculine, there is an intrinsic reaction and recognition of masculinity that cannot be shifted …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 05:03 AM
1

What you're describing here is exactly what women think of sex with men they aren't attracted to. Not really. It's not that sample. Women are attracted to men on a sliding scale. There is no man that they would do 100% anything with 100% of the time. Women go in and out of the mood depending on the setting, person, hormones, and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 02:35 AM
1

Prostitution is ALWAYS a choice, the ones forced to have sex for money that's human trafficking and rape itself for the sake of remark the sex services is called prostitution but in essence is not. I believe /u/Zercher_it is referring to sex negative feminists whom would believe all prostitution is human trafficking, regardless of any evidence otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 11:59 PM
6

To be fair, this is the view of 2nd wave, anti-sex feminists. Or some sect of social justice warriors in the modern era. These feminists detest any form of sex being used by a woman as a means of work, power, or any form of status. Such feminists would be highly against women famous from sex appeal like Kim Kardashian as well Most women who declare themselves feminists in America are more pro sex work
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 11:57 PM
2

Interesting. I actually don't mind these things. I would prefer girls who like to get their ass eaten though since I'm really into that. ​ The only behavior in the woman's past which would bother me is a gang bang or any MMF threesome type of arrangement.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:58 PM
1

No one forced a choice and you know that. Quite the opposite - it shows that left to their own devices women choose to have less sex. But you already know that's the point and are now acting willfully ignorant because you dont want to admit that. You might be replying to the wrong person?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:50 PM
1

This is so scary and sad. The fact that men cant control their lustful thought? I cant even imagine being force to wear what women from egypt wear and live in tropical land. Ah sorry i kind of didn't explain this well enough. Egypt is a secular muslim country. Women got the right to vote in 1956 and also banned gender based discrimination in 1956. There is no law to force any hijab. There are also reserved parliament seats which must be held by a woman. But the point is, it's just a conservative…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:36 PM
1

There are sex toys, and there are entertainments brighter and more fulfilling than sex. Do you honestly believe a sex toy is more fulfilling than sex? Are you a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:31 PM
1

Everyone accused me of being on roids in my 20s. Some people are just naturally cut in their younger years. steroid use is more common in frats then it was in the past I am talking about https://timsquirrell.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/steroids.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:30 PM
1

Just the fact of being able to be happy without the need or desire for sex can cause people to question if they're asexual. Exactly. That's why I believe the only real form of asexuality would be along the lines of AIS, androgen insensitivity syndrome. The idea of asexual is too heavily influenced on the effort needed to get sex and not the actual neurochemical desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:15 PM
1

I think the idea of "perpetual happiness" needs to be questioned, I am thinking more of happiness as in, "are you overall content with your life as a whole?" or sex that comes with too much drama. Are you a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:12 PM
1

How is asexuality related to this? ​ Being asexual is what you desire, people might have had sex initially for a while then realized they were asexual. ​ Example, my tattoo artist was actually a straight woman for part of her life then become a lesbian after her husband cheated on her while pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 07:30 AM
2

But there was no decent one that was interested in me during my 20's because all the ones I saw as my equals were all focused on being part of Chad's harem and my SMV was a little lower than it was now. Have you found that to be true in the mid 20's and late 20's as well? Personally I definitely found this in college, BIG TIME. Like literal 6/10 range of girls would put on tons of eye make up and try to grind with these 6'4", roided up likely guys at parties. But after college I think it got a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 06:47 AM
1

When I was single I felt lonely despite an active social life, and without sex my hormones get all messed up. Can you describe that a little more? That sounds pretty intriguing? Like do you feel less desirable or wanted when you don't have sex? Or is there an attachment element of sex you crave?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 06:45 AM
1

Your reasoning is that people find celibacy tough Not my reasoning. Never stated this in my OP. This isn't a CMV post. Pain, misfortune and discomfort are inevitable, and they are as much threads in the fabric of happiness as pleasure or comfort. The former drive people to discover their true desires, purpose, and deeper meaning in life Aside, that is a slippery slope. There has to be some connection showing how specific pains and misfortunes might drive people to discover purpose and deeper mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 06:10 AM
1

sorry I don't follow, what's Kant?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:41 AM
3

Monk mode means that you have decided not to have sex. I think this is not a feasible solution while still living in a modern, metropolitan area where women dress sexy. It would make more sense if I was living in a more secluded or peaceful destination though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:39 AM
1

The point is that some monks, nuns and other celibate people across time had fulfilling lives. This is absolutely true, as history testifies. Do you not understand many, many religious devotes in fact break the pledge of celibacy? These are found in nearly every realm of religious fundamentalism, https://www.salon.com/2014/02/03/from_good_girl_to_prostitute_my_path_from_ultra_orthodox_judaism_to_craigslist_sex_ad/ here is another example if you didn't like my catholic church example. Also most m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:37 AM
1

There's a name for these types of people, but it's escaping me. The word androgynous keeps popping into my head, but that isn't right... Would likely be androgen insensitivity syndrome. I actually met a girl like that in China once. She still had the desire to find a soul mate though, but she had zero sexual drive or any form of sexual desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:32 AM
1

but I used to have a decent amount of sex. I'm currently 26. Yea I stated in the OP this would only concern people who never really had a sex life. Are you a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:30 AM
6

I’ve had lots of sex before. then off the bat you wouldn't qualify for what this discussion is aiming towards. As stated in the op, it's for people who have never really had a sex life, if you get what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:26 AM
3

This makes me think it's a social comparison issue, not an actual need. Not a comparison issue, it's an environmental issue. Back in college, when I would see all these ABG's, or girls with big asses and short shorts strolling around the gym or walking to frat parties, I was thinking and wanting sex all the time. When I was single it was pretty bad and frustrating. ​ But when I have spent some time in Egypt, where it's by and large men in public places and no woman shows skin, i don't care much …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:23 AM
1

A good escort does the same thing. I agree 100%. When i lived and worked in Hong Kong I used escorts pretty regularly. It was more of like 3 hour appts, which usually consisted of dinner plus going back to my apartment or just spending the evening in a hot tub and such at my apartment. I felt a lot more adept at interacting and understanding women, and surprisingly had more respect for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:21 AM
0

You're asking for a source for the comment that SOME humans have existed on earth who were happy without sex Im asking for a source that is either an interview or a journal or some publication that studied people that feel happy while not having sex at all in their younger years. That is not unreasonable. If you wanted people at least one example of someone who was unhappy while not having sex in their younger years, I could find you plenty of examples of that. Do you believe not one human has e…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:19 AM
1

I'm a celibate and I probably would not be a happier person if I was sexually active. How old are you and how much sex have you had in your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:15 AM
3

Are you saying "cuddle therapy" is an acceptable solution for the male sexual imperative? It's a solution in the sense it makes men much more comfortable touching and being close to women if they have approach anxiety or get nervous when talking or interacting with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:14 AM
1

I didn't talk until around 3 and a half, eye contact probs....list goes on Ohhh i see. Yea I had an issue with shyness with women since I was bullied in middle school and high school but never anything like the eye contact issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:11 AM
1

Are you aware that I am talking about monasteries in 800 AD? The catholic church has existed since jesus christ.... But I am only talking about modern society for this question. I am not asking "has there ever been a man or woman who lived from 18-40 with no sex and was happy"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:10 AM
5

Tesla never married, explaining that his chastity was very helpful to his scientific abilities.[229] He once said in earlier years that he felt he could never be worthy enough for a woman, considering women superior in every way. His opinion had started to sway in later years when he felt that women were trying to outdo men and make themselves more dominant. This "new woman" was met with much indignation from Tesla, who felt that women were losing their femininity by trying to be in power. In an…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:08 AM
-2

Are you familiar with the fact that monasteries and convents have existed for thousands of years? Are you also aware of the rampant child sex abuse propagated by priests, bishops, and the catholic church?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:02 AM
2

> I can't interact with people in that way. ​ I don't get why though, you just mentioned you prefer genuine connections, and not a business transaction. ​ Are you medically autistic? Or just assumed to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:01 AM
2

So, what you really meant was that is it possible for someone to be happy sexless in our current society? Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:59 AM
2

Even if it was just for a short while I want a real connection with a woman and not a business transaction. This is a common misconception of prostitution, that is propagated by anti-sex feminists. Im engaged now, but before I met my wife when I was working in Shenzhen, and Hong Kong I used prostitutes pretty regularly. The girl doesn't give u duty sex, she becomes very playful and flirty, and will seem genuinely warm and feminine toward you. In fact I would say using escorts made me understand …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:57 AM
1

If someone commits to monk mode, What is monk mode? Do you mean studying to become a buddhist monk?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:50 AM
-1

there have always been SOME people "happy" to go their whole lives without sex, Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:49 AM
1

If a person went without sex, but still had friends they could be happy and close to, I think they'd be totally fine. I kind of disagree, since it depends on the environment your in. I am engaged now, but back in college there was a period of time where i had to take a lot of classes in one semester and a summer since i switched majors after the end of the 2nd year, so i was single and had almost no time to meet new girls. So I did have a close nit group of buddies from my old and new department…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:46 AM
1

You're right they're around 22. No, Kalina Ryu, Morgan lee, a lot of popular ones are pushing 30
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:33 AM
2

men overestimate how much they really want sex and underestimate how much they just want to take care of others. Why do you believe this? If this was true, why are porn sites like one of the top browsed sites in a lot of countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:32 AM
3

It’s nice but I don’t miss it. Are you a man or a woman? By miss it, how much sex have you had before?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:30 AM
1

Jesus is it really that bad? Yes. that graph is a well respected study by WP with over 6000 participants, and has been repeated year after year to show different results.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:29 AM
1

Even now I feel as if I'd be a lot happier if I got laid even once in the coming decade. Do you feel you are trying to get attention? Are you a man or a woman? Would you ever at some point consider prostitution if you remain a virgin for a while?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:28 AM
3

No in the way that most women don’t stay between 18-20 forever/ have perfectly waxed vaginas 24/7 a lot of women in porn are actually older than that but just have a lot of work done, but I see what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 12:07 AM
1

Past an age, if you're not married, you're a loser. In every circle I've seen, this is the case. Your only refuge would be church and even then, you'll feel really left out when all the cool girls are in the married ministry and you're still in "single ministry" at fucking 44 years old. I agree 100%. The only women I know that aren't married and aren't considered losers are basically Oprah Winfrey.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 12:06 AM
2

As I said before it’s in your head and you’re into the idea of sex not the act per se If this was true there would be no preference or stereotypes or ideas around penis size.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 12:04 AM
1

No because vibrators do not provide any attention or feeling of being desired by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 12:02 AM
1

The difference is that porn gives men an unrealistic standard of what women look like naked In what way? I mean what determines unrealistic here. Are we saying this from a fat-acceptance perspective or just that most women aren't that hot?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 12:02 AM
1

How do feminists make money as an organization? Private and public donations. Most feminist groups are non profit corporations
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 01:40 PM
1

Women typically show concern of sexually active women, men will outright hate them. This Sub-reddit, r/TheRedPill, and r/MGTOW proves this. Wanting to have casual sex or not wanting a promiscuous woman for marriage does not mean you hate women. I would never marry a drug addict yet I would love to donate to charities that help drug addicts, I do not hate them. Mean while feminists in the second wave invented the idea women are objectified by sexual attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 01:39 PM
1

the men who enjoy competing would still compete. and standards would adjust accordingly. you cant socially engineer that away. this is very true. Even when I was back in college years ago, despite their being a gender gap of more women (59% women to 41% men), the only guys that were actively having casual sex with attractive girls were frat bros or athletes. Casual sex here means you meet at a party and have oral sex or sex, or have a pure sex relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 05:34 AM
1

You'll have to have a massive, and I do mean MASSIVE social change in order to see this turn around. Well that is definitely happening or in the process of happening. The amount of men in their 20's not having sex has tripled in the past 9-10 years, and is increasing faster than ever before https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/lpPQCfvc6yMX_dmg3r67e7h6Foc=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/4C7SSBIXSNFCLOJIGCWUOKDYTY.png
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 06:34 AM
10

This is a pointless topic because toxic masculinity is a concept invented to discourage men from embodying traditional masculinity without regard to the potential repercussions of that discouragement. ​ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxic_masculinity ​ A majority of the traits listed in toxic masculinity are promoted for women to attain and possess. ​ Although violence for women is not directly promoted, instances where women do act violent or promote violence are not taken seriously and receive…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 06:25 AM
2

If we are viewing N count as the number and not who the number was composed of, you are correct. It's an ego thing. ​ Now, if we are talking about *who* she has slept with that has very legitimate concerns that are related to the man's safety. ​ If a woman has knowingly dated or slept with a convict or ex-con, or some type of gang member, that can endanger another man's life because it's not known what affiliations she still has with him or if he watches her or has surveillance, etc. For all he …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 04:25 PM
1

Im not the one in charge of defining it in each of the 51 states! Oh i see. you are talking about the legal definition and how some states group it all under sexual assault. I thought you were claiming something like an ass grab is no different than rape
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 04:18 PM
1

Thats all there is to it. No conspiracy. Just a lot of people who can't agree on where the line is between rape and sexual assault. Are you being sarcastic? Do you personally not see the difference between an ass grab in a night club and forced vaginal penetration at gun point?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 03:41 PM
6

Man you've got a complex or something. You think feminists main goal is to take away your shit? How did you come to that conclusion? Ummm, how many feminists have stated kill all white men? https://twitter.com/hashtag/killallwhitemen?lang=en And then multiple articles by feminists defending those who wish to kill all white men https://medium.com/@Lydiasquidia/violence-rage-killallwhitemen-f9b8d3334637 But at this point any example of radical feminism I give to you will either be discarded by you…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 03:32 PM
4

Where does it say that in the article? Did you just make that all up? Please read the article and don't play dum as an argument. Overpaying women in Silicon Valley hasn’t traditionally been much of a problem, but results of a recent Google pay equity study concluded that the tech giant has been doing just that. Really, Google thinks they’re paying women more than men for the same work. First two sentences, google is overpaying women for the same role. https://steemit.com/news/@zanting/kelly-elli…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 03:25 PM
3

So you just automatically block feminists? What the fuck? Self identifying feminists (use the term feminist in their social media bio) who work in tech absolutely. I have every right to protect myself against them. As a jewish, white man they are not my friend, and will seek to take away what I have rightfully earned in the workplace. I would also reject any candidate we interview that is a radical feminist. But on the record I'm fine with other forms of SJW's like black lives matter because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 03:19 PM
11

I don't even talk to people like that. It's downright dangerous for one's professional life. Anytime I realize someone is that kind of person and worst of all if they work in tech I block them on all social media platforms including linkedin. ​ For example https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2019/03/05/google-finds-gender-bias-against-men-really/#200e5a6a9392 ​ One female engineer at google sued the company for them hiring a male engineer at a level above hers because she had the same years…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 01:18 AM
2

Is status-based hypergamy a reason for cheating with which you're more comfortable? I am not sure how someone can feel comfortable with any form of cheating, but in some ways if it was a this or that situation, status based cheating would be preferable to cheating with some ex-con guy who works at the dollar store. Why? Because with status, it's something you can control and improve, and it's understandable. But with the RP sort of hypergamy, its just low class,
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 09:54 PM
2

I mean, she's going to school here...her internal norms and values are liable to change. Went to, she works as an accountant now. Not in the way you think. See in grad schools in California or New York most Chinese students hang out with other mainland Chinese students. They still go out together to restaurants similar to what they would back home (hotpot, dumplings). When my fiance was in grad school, she had some friends from germany and spain, but most of the Americans treated her rudely by l…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 09:29 PM
1

> good luck with that one! LOL ​ Already proposed to a chinese-main land girl i met in grad school here in california
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:41 PM
1

"People my age laugh at those who get married early, because only rural people without an education do that," says Dai. "It's not that successful women don't want to marry, it's that making money makes us pickier." That article doesn't have data and is just using some very wealthy chinese as examples. Doesn't represent China as a whole. Only the richest of the rich get to go to undergrad internationally. My fiance is Chinese and only got to come to USA for grad school on scholarship for the Chin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:40 PM
3

And even then, those cultures are changing fast Nah, your jumping the gun: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheng_nu There is no real acceptance of unmarried, single women in China. Most asian countries don't have a concept of single, happy women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 03:46 PM
1

Yes, job or anything that hints what your salary is, This isn't husband or boyfriend material. In my experience showing off wealth, but not giving it, while also looking good greatly increases sexual tension. Nice suits, nice shoes, a porsche, my submariner, is all a part of a man having presence. ​ In the beginning, I will not put any investment down besides food or drinks. But after there is a good amount of intense sex involved, I'll probably drop a small hint of a gift, like an LV bag or a t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 03:18 PM
10

Why not just have an auto paternity test at birth even within marriage and allow men to opt out if they wish? That would work
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 03:13 PM
0

faithful wives are an impossibility. If you want a faithful wife you should seek outside America, more like south american or chinese/vietnamese, cultures that actually emphasize the importance of a husband and marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 03:10 PM
21

How would you make this illegal? A woman could just be wrong. If the child was conceived within the period of marriage than by default giving birth to any other man's child would be proof of a fraud. We would have to assume a marriage is a claim of monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 03:04 PM
2

millennials are (possibly) cheating less than previous generations. To be fair this study references Americans while in your OP it's a study from the UK. The UK likely has more liberal attitudes towards sex than USA
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 03:02 PM
2

Do you feel a woman is “yours” after a singular date? Definitely not. If a woman goes to brunch with you on Saturday as a first date, but also goes on a first date coffee with another guy on Monday... what are your thoughts? No sex was had with either. Honestly no kissing as well. Has she “cheated on you”? Are you really that attached to a woman you had a singular outing with? Nothing wrong with this. Basically, I start to feel like a girl is "mine" when she starts displaying more girlfriend , c…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:48 AM
2

. The number of male virgins in their 30s has skyrocketed the last decade while the number of women has remained steady. ​ Even men 18-29 that are sexless is going way up: https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/lpPQCfvc6yMX_dmg3r67e7h6Foc=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/4C7SSBIXSNFCLOJIGCWUOKDYTY.png
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:39 AM
1

It is slang. Dictionaries pick up on slang and everyday usage. Sigh, look up the difference between a denotation and connotation......
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:35 AM
1

/u/truespirit89 if you are actually interested in gauging this, you should look more at some studies checking for frequency of sex in the past 12 months instead of lifetime n counts https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/lpPQCfvc6yMX_dmg3r67e7h6Foc=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/4C7SSBIXSNFCLOJIGCWUOKDYTY.png ​ There is a trend where the amount of women having sex between the ages of 18-29 is staying more or less the same while the portion of sexless men be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:34 AM
2

If there is no kiss by the second date it's a 100% no go. ​ For sex it's tricky cause it depends on a lot of things. I would more base it off of how long until we are at least alone in either her room or my room together. This should happen by date 3 or possibly 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:25 AM
1

You're using the casual slang, not the scientific definition. Merriam-Webster is not casual slang. Monogamy is not a scientific definition. In fact that's an oxy moron. Science provides studies, data, evidence, and theorems. Which I guess you could say is religious, but many people don't see it that way or act about it that way. I highly, highly doubt anyone who is not religious would opt out of having premarital sex. you are a strong outlier here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:18 AM
1

Being religious doesn't change the definition of monogamy. No, that's your definition. No where does the definition of monogamy state anything about one person for life: Definition of monogamy 1a : the state or practice of having only one sexual partner at a time https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monogamy The idea of marital only sex is purely a religious idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:11 AM
2

> Monogamy applies to sex. ​ You should have stated that at the beginning. ​ > you're still monogamous as long as you only have sex with one in your life. ​ Are you religious?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 09:42 PM
4

Going on a date with someone else isn't respectful to the first person. It's like you think they are some thing you toy with and use for entertainment. But why is monogamy established at the first date? What if it's unknown even if a second date is in the cards? I have gone on many more first dates than I have second dates. A lot of first dates might end with a kiss but are unclear if i will see them again or if they are interested in more.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 06:58 AM
2

the economy, Don't jump the gun there. While it might not cause sexlessness, a booming economy and women getting into higher positions and promotions will definitely also boost women's standards. Women having access to nice toys and luxuries in life on their own definitely changes the one looks for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 06:53 AM
1

Fact is,men are the most physically attractive they have ever been.Gym culture became a thing the last 10 years . In my view that has an exclusionary effect in a lot of cases. If more and more men are becoming muscular, that means the standard of being "buff" (when people notice you as a guy who is strong or works out) goes up and gets tougher. Guys who do not work out at all are at a greater disadvantage. The amount of guys on steroids has gone waaay up too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 06:48 AM
1

yes, i don't have articles in english about specific instances, but you can read up about places like Dongguan or Japanese corporate soap lands https://theculturetrip.com/asia/china/articles/chinese-city-nicknamed-eastern-amsterdam/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 02:45 PM
1

If the only thing stopping someone cheating is legal risk, they're gonna cheat anyway. Soz I don't agree with your logic The legal risk of bank robbery stops most people from attempting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 02:42 PM
1

No, I would nor sleep with her, even if I could. So if you opened your bedroom door and saw here spread out naked you would not tempt yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 04:11 AM
1

I am fundamentally disgusted by women like her. But why though? You wouldn't sleep with her if you could?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 04:06 AM
1

Bitch has a day job, is she that thirsty for male attention? Absolutely pathetic. Why does this bother you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 03:11 AM
1

That's damn stupid. So essentially have women parasitize off society? ​ Most IG influencers do not make 100% of their income off of sponsorship. Some do, but those are the minority. The majority have a day job as well, but any of the ones with super lavish stuff or are always on vacation are actually prostitutes: https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/the-rise-of-instagram-prostitution/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 03:08 AM
3

and especially the last 10 years, has leadership positions been harder (not impossible) to get extra strange. This is more of an American thing. Japanese and Chinese companies sometimes make company orgies for the executives with hordes of prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 09:16 PM
1

> Hell no why do you think instatard "influencers" are remotely positive role models ​ They represent a good way for women to make money off their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 09:10 PM
4

For every Zuckerberg And it's important to not forget zuckerberg did get into harvard . That is an extraordinary achievement that 99.99% of college drop outs could not actually do. ​ Ivy league drop out != college drop out
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 04:17 PM
2

She may have made an adult movie but gosh dang it she didn't have any kids out of wedlock. Kim had her own wealth prior to meeting kanye, so this is not even a comparison. Jasmin on the other hand grew up dirt poor in the Philippines.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 03:41 PM
1

I'd assume its' some reasonably wealthy woman who can afford to raise a kid on her own, In this case that's not true. Jasmin states in her youtube and interviews she grew up dirt poor in the Philippines and before meeting him was a moderate real estate agent. Not college educated.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 03:38 PM
1

do you seriously think a wedding will change that? Well marriage is a higher form of commitment, I mean if you break a marriage alimony is involved and more wealth is shared.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 03:37 PM
1

She does have plans to get married lol, For this discussion that does not count.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 03:30 PM
2

Why is she popular? I meet normal girls on the street everyday which are much nicer. She is conventionally hot. She has the kim k type of thicc and asian look. She would definitely be considered fairly hot at any music festival or gym crowd in LA. or how they are protected under the law. If they break up, she's still guaranteed a good life for herself and the child So is this a bad decision for the football player?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 07:32 AM
2

what is your definition of marriage? Interesting, I didn't think of it this way. I am leaning more toward the legal side, but it really boils down to how much assurance either party has in the relationship that it's stable. It sounds like you and your husband have a great deal of bonding and commitment to one another, so you would count as married. But I am assuming your husband is not a pro footballer traveling for long periods of time around the country with groupies....
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 07:25 AM
0

Sometimes pregnancy is a surprise. If they still intend to keep the baby with no plans to marry immediately, that still falls under the intentional category.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 07:21 AM
1

Only if they're ok with raising their kids alone and never getting married ever. So if a woman believes the man will eventually marry her after the baby then she shouldn't be having babies with boyfriends?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 05:54 AM
0

Yeah it drives them nuts that women can now have sex without having to face pregnancy/childbirth. It's actually quite scary to me how much hate their is and wanting to control women's bodies. In the big picture though it doesn't matter. If birth control didn't exist nor did abortion the vast majority of women simply wouldn't have casual sex. When you make an action more risky, less people will participate in it. More so with the current child support laws men wouldn't be risk free either. ​ A mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 05:53 AM
2

especially in countries with hate speech laws. There are no hate speech laws in the US https://firstamendmentwatch.org/slants-case-supreme-court-affirms-no-hate-speech-exception/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 05:47 AM
1

The men want it this way so why not? But what about for the woman though? Is it a good idea for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 05:45 AM
2

No food before sex. Only eat dinner with girls you are already fucking. That's a horrible strategy. A guy who refuses to pay at all for food with a girl looks like a low income man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 07:48 AM
2

that's not how it works anymore. if you try to take a girl out to a nice restaurant and pay for her meal, that's going to tell her two things about you: 1. you're beta bux provider material and 2. you're very inexperienced/clueless about how things normally work in modern dating/relationships. ​ That's only for very American girls. Any chinese or korean girl would expect you to treat her well. But that is also different because their culture much more aligns wealth towards sexual attractiveness …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 07:45 AM
1

The "first date" isn't just the first date; it's the first time you meet the person altogether. You've only seen a few pics and exchanged a few texts, so you really have no idea what magnitude of weirdo you might meet. The ability to bail quickly has never been more important. I disagree, at least in my experience. Every girl I have met off tinder once in person had a very obvious, non ambiguous feeling *why* we were meeting. It has never felt at all weird or awkward. Any form of touch or escala…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 07:44 AM
1

I think women have a sort of minimum threshhold for looks, as well as certain things that are dealbreakers, and as long as you clear those bars you're probably OK. I think those are still based on the average of what kind of guy a woman hangs around though. Point in blank, my tinder literally blows up with 50 matches a day in taiwan or thailand but in SF it's like 1 per 2 weeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 10:58 PM
2

It is easier for you to get casual sex or LTR? What do people define as casual sex in this sub?? Would going on a date, having dinner, then having 69 count? Or let's say on the 2nd date you go for a movie, go shopping, and then go all out sex? Or is casual sex strictly meeting girls are bars or venues or up front agreeing to an LTR? If the former, I don't really see a difference between the two. All the women I have dated pretty much had sex or oral sex and a make out session on the first or sec…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 05:20 PM
1

Let me answer for myself. When I love a man I want to have sex with him ASAP. How do you define love? Are you talking more an excitement and adorement, or a feeling of a soul mate?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 05:11 PM
2

Wow, you have this all backwards! Women tend to be more picky about the men they settle down with. If it's just a one-night thing, we're willing to overlook a lot of flaws. ​ The flaws overlooked are long-term compatibility flaws, not physical attractiveness. ​ Do you honestly not agree women are more picky in regards to physical attractiveness and confidence in hookups and ONS?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 05:06 PM
1

It’s not asked about in the context of a consensual event. It is asked in the context of non-consensual events ​ Wrong, they don't use the term "forced" or "non-consensual" They said "coercive". ​ Behaviorally descriptive survey items (i.e., “Have you ever coerced somebody to intercourse by holding them down?”) versus labeling survey items (i.e., “Have you ever raped somebody?”) will yield different responses, in that more men will admit to sexually coercive behaviors and more women will self-re…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:46 PM
1

Additionally this study here looks at Male university students and finds that almost one third of them would rape women if there were no consequences. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/vio.2014.0022 ​ What's wrong with that? You are asking about a fantasy. ​ How many people do you honestly think would love to steal a Louis Vuitton bag or a Rolex watch or rob the bank if there were no consequences?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:39 PM
1

No I'm not a feminist. Why are you defending feminist propaganda ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:37 PM
1

Yes, I would make that argument lol. What's idiotic about the argument you quoted? It's not illogical, irrational, incoherent or frankly uncontroversial Are you a feminist ? That quote is a straw man, no one here has argued any amount of crime or sex crime is justifieD
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:20 PM
1

Which again is not a right TO a job, its a right not to be fired from a job for a SPECIFIC reason That’s correct, but this feminist I was responding to was meaning to say “for any reason”, see below : If you can be fired because "we don't need you anymore", that alone 100% covers definition of "any reason".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:13 PM
3

You believe that statistics collated by federal law enforcement are exaggerated based on what evidence? Dear god RAINN is not federal law enforcement, and I never claimed statistics were made up. You didn’t even read my post and dived into a straw man. They are hiding the amount of rapes being committed and merging them with the category of non rape sexual assault. This is factual, you can clearly see that in the links.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:07 PM
1

Lumping then together is not the same thing as saying 50,000 people were assaulted or murdered. I’m like every mass shooting news story or report says X were killed, and Y were injured. Nobody freaking says “10 people were either injured or killed”. That sounds retarded anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 09:37 AM
2

Rape means penetration with a penis (the penetration can be slight). Ok, but in my post, i cited a page where it claims unwanted fondling would be categorized as an attempted rape, is that true? Also I am curious, to what degree can coercion or intimidation be used in a 261 case?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 05:08 AM
-2

There are degrees to it, but there is never a benign or acceptable form of it. You are lumping it together into one category of "unacceptable". It's all unacceptable aka it's all just as bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 05:05 AM
1

> I’m not making up statistics. I’m just giving you my perspective. Never said that I was a feminist. ​ Sorry I was referring to the people who published the links i put in my starter post, not you yourself. Apologies. ​ > But, sexual assault is still traumatizing and the aftermath sucks. I was a little kid when it happened to me, thank god it wasn’t full on sodomy. It was still penatrative and against my will. ​ Well that's actual rape AND child abuse. ​ Surely you can agree there is difference…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 05:04 AM
1

I have yet to handle an actual PC 261 case. Curious, what is the actual differnece between PC 261 and just a sexual assault? What is required to qualify as PC 261
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 05:00 AM
2

Does that mean that it’s somewhat okay to just grab someone’s ass because it’s not forced rape. No and that’s a complete straw man. No one here is claiming that at all. Making up statistics because you feel something is important is manipulated data, feminists don’t get a free pass for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:39 AM
4

How to you read that from the text? They are using the term “unwanted” and not “non-consensual” which are two different things. I don’t want to get a blood test but I can consent to it because my doctor suggested I should.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:31 AM
3

I know a lot of women who have been sexually assaulted, if not raped Huh? What do you mean “if not raped” ?? There is a clear boundary unless you are viewing them one in the same....
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:28 AM
3

Similarly, getting a passing lewd comment isn't as bad as being held hostage while a psycho details his every fantasy to you in lurid detail, but it's just as unwanted from the receiver's perspective. So you are kind of proving the point here feminists want to view all forms of unwanted sexual touch or comments as the same. “Just as unwanted” clearly means your trying to increase victimhood recognition for women here. This actually harms victims of more serious sex crimes because it equates them…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:17 AM
1

If you can be fired because "we don't need you anymore", that alone 100% covers definition of "any reason". If someone who is fired can prove with evidence they were being fired for racial discrimination then they can win a lawsuit in court or a settlement. Your statement is still inaccurate and false. Your now stating people can guarantee their innocence by their own word.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 03:02 AM
3

WHICH THEY DIDN'T. So what's your issue again? They said all over the place “sexual assault and rape” as well as “sexual assault or rape” Women don’t get a free pass for posting weak and false statistics. Women are held to the same degree men are when making claims. Stop being uncivil. Your only chipping away at feminist credibility
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 02:58 AM
1

Your point ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 02:56 AM
3

rape is sexual assault. Do you honestly not see the fact that not al sexual assault is rape? Only a small portion is ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 02:25 AM
1

You can be fired because they're downsizing, or position is no longer needed, or you dripped some urine on a toilet seat or infinity of other reasons that have nothing to do with race,sex, or sexual orientation. That is correct, but your statement of “no one has a right to a job” is highly misleading, similar to the statements of the sexual assault surveys you seem to be supporting as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 02:23 AM
0

Literally they summed 2 numbers to make a larger point. No they didn’t. As I stated , they are purposefully hiding the total number of rapes. Nobody says “violent crime or murder”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 02:20 AM
3

If you're trying to show the extent of sexual assault problem, its perfectly fine. Then they would just mention sexual assault and not mention rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 01:49 AM
4

You don't have a right to a job or college education in the United States. That’s actually isn’t true. Lookup the Equal Opportunity act. It’s against federal law to discriminate against employees based on race, sex, or sexual orientation
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 01:43 AM
1

Ok they're pumping up the numbers. How about we just say that any amount of unwanted fondling is actually bad, and that abusing another human being for your sexual pleasure is always wrong? Sure, but we have to view different degrees of sexual crime in different ways. You obviously would feel different if your friend was just punched in the stomach vs if your friend was murdered. A victim of an ass grab in a night club is far, far less serious than a full blown penetrative forced rape .
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 01:38 AM
1

For me it's kind of the opposite ​ The more sex I had with different women the more it gave me opportunities to learn how to be charming and flattering. It gives you more insight to what women are looking for from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 12:12 AM
23

The boundaries of sexual assault and rape are conflated with one another. Although rape is a type of sexual assault, murder is also a type of violent crime. We wouldn't ever make a statistic conflating the violent crime and murder rates, but that is what is being done with rape and sexual assault. For example, the HEDS survey is a nation wide survey used in Harvard, Stanford, and many other universities to over 900,000 undergraduates, it asks: https://www.hedsconsortium.org/facultystaff-survey-c…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:47 PM
1

ie that one home isn’t the “rich” home and the other the “poor” home. A child does not need to live in a rich or poor home. That is not a need. When one parent declines to maintain the proper, equal relationship between the two households, receiving it retroactively is more about seeking damages than anything else - people are required to pay for their damn kids, They are required but it is not a need. Paying another parent to take care of a child is not a need. The child will not stop breathing…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 11:55 PM
0

What do you guys think child support goes to? To whatever a woman wants. To maintain a home a custodial parent must at least provide: Clothing/ Toiletries/ After school child care/ A room for the child to sleep in/ Healthcare/ Dental care/ Enrichment objects (toys, books)/ Food keyword "at least" And that is also not true. It's tied to the amount of income the parents have. https://www.babble.com/celebrity/11-largest-child-support-payment-who-pays-out-gets-the-most-money-per-month/ hell some wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 06:12 PM
2

(to be fair I'm pretty sure she lived through Depression era). He said growing up in her household was kind of like being in the military from a young age. He always had chores, had to wake up early, had to start working as soon as he was able, had to pay for any luxuries he wanted himself, etc. His childhood experiences with her (for better or worse) probably played no small part in his stoicism, he was always fit, and he didn't really have time to pine after girls between school and jobs; they…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 02:37 AM
2

“His expectation will be that his wife or partner will do everything for him because to him, love is around ‘doing things for me’.” I would say the real problem is the over-nurturing from the mother cause men not to have independent decision making skills. A lot of over nurturing moms are also controlling, they tend to push certain decisions on their sons and teach them to differ to others for decisions rather than make them on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 02:28 AM
1

Actually, a clean cut image sells better than you'd think. Not in silicon valley
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 11:02 PM
1

> "When he putts, I get weak in the knees," said no woman ever. ​ https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-secret-world-of-golf-groupies
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 05:32 PM
1

Why did you cross out tattoos and drugs? Do you not see all the states legalizing weed? Have you not stepped into a gym lately with the rampant tattoo culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 05:31 PM
1

Who is a betabux?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 05:20 AM
2

From the perspective as someone who helps lots of guys and women find new relationships, I believe the main problem is a growing inverse association between attractiveness and intellect or wealth. ​ There is a growing and expanding anti-establishment culture which promotes the idea that drugs, drinking, working out, tattoos, and coolness is more important than money, income, or education in determining sexual attractiveness or appeal. As a whole, more women develop stereotypes that associate hig…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 05:20 AM
1

Do you think that the biggest problem sexless guys have is being fat though? No, the sexual appeal of women on average is falsely inflated because the average woman is fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 04:55 AM
1

https://www.buzzfeed.com/sarahhan/average-american-woman-2018 As buzzfeed helpfully reminds us, 68% of american women look like the women in this listicle. That means if you aren’t attracted to women like that, fyi, most of the women in that article ARE NOT size 14 nor near the average BMI of 29.6 for women. A BMI of 29.4-29.6 on a 5'4" woman is 170~ pounds. Besides woman number 3 and 5 in that article, the rest are well over 200 pounds. A couple could be near 270 pounds or so.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 04:53 AM
1

Get rid of the internet Why the internet as opposed to just social media and news?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 04:41 AM
0

Very good question Given the fact that the second woman has made very little money, she is the better choice. This is because these types of girls tend to have an easier time looking up to men and are more easily impressed. Even though they have traveled and had experiences, they usually, in my experience, have less hangups about sex and are way more fun. Since they look for men to be more the breadwinner it just makes a much easier role to fill with them in a relationship. Now, if number 2 was …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 04:37 AM
2

> This is what you call mental illness? My aunt and grandmother are paranoid schizos. Also bipolar men can be cat nip to a lot of women. ​ The op is perhaps conflating mental illness and developmental disorders with one another
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 08:49 PM
2

Why should anybody "put in effort" to make a relationship work with a person they are not married to? Because they want the relationship to work?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:06 PM
0

Most places school is a legal requirement. There is still home schooling. Also no one needs to follow the law. The child can become a professional criminal. They literally don't grow and develop language if they aren't cared for adequately. One does not need to grow and develop, let alone grow and develop to be successful. Look at who's the president of the United States. Before we go further, bare in mind i am arguing these in response to the post about sex not being a need. My inner view is th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 07:16 AM
0

That it isn't necessarily good for the opposite gender? That's actually not true at all. The same gender can also restrict the same gender to gain more favorable attainment of their biological imperative. A huge example of this is the different waves of feminism or women bashing other women, or women hating on sex workers/sugar babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:26 AM
1

Why do you think we we aren’t ruled by instincts? Oh but we are within the bounds of how we perceive society. All people make decisions in part due to instinct. A woman declares a guy as creepy not because of a necessarily logical situation, but because she feels her sexual agency might be threatened by him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:23 AM
0

You clearly have no idea how much work taking care of an infant is. "caring" for an infant is not a need, it is a desire. Beyond food, water, and shelter, an infant does not need anything else. Once they are in school you get a couple of hours between drop off and pick up. School is most certainly not a need. A child will not die if it does not go to school. That is a desire. But kids are also constantly sick. Meaning she is having to take off work. You do not need to skip school if you are sick…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:19 AM
1

So you would rather your own child be in a homeless shelter than pay child support? The child does not need to become homeless, the mother could become a prostitute or sugar baby to support the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:06 AM
1

Look, you need to pay for your kids A kid does not need to be paid in order to live. They can apply for foster homes or food stamps or tons of programs that help orphaned children. It is a desire, not a need. A real man isn't going to let his children go without just because he isn't with their mother. That's a no true scotsman fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:55 AM
0

In the absence of state sponsored childcare, it's not possible to work. You can make money off of youtube, being a content creator, or working online. Childcare is not a need, its a desire. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak built the apple computer out of their parents garage. They did not need these suppports you speak of, hence they are desires. Most low wage jobs pay less or equal to the cost of childcare. Childcare is a luxury, you can find jobs where you don't need child care or work from home.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:53 AM
1

Many families don't qualify or met requirements to even get donations or government aid. They only don't qualify if they have too high of an income. Which would then mean they can purchase food and staples as what they need.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:51 AM
1

Having a child makes it extremely difficult for her to work You can work from home on your computer in many professions, you can also start your own business. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak built the first apple computer in their parents garage without a college degree. Daycare is also very expensive. Daycare is a luxury, it is not a need. Daycare is not required to keep a child breathing. How does she support herself when lumbered with an infant? She could ask a family member to help or look for …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:50 AM
1

Would you argue that men in these situations don't deserve money from the child's mother either? Yes, it would also be a desire in either scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:45 AM
1

Also: here's food for thought: it's neither a want or a need. It's literally an entitlement. What? An entitlement is something guaranteed by law, a want or need is a natural concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:45 AM
1

I have seen the extent that females will go through just to ensure they get that check. I seen females falsely accuse the father of domestic violence so he could never get custody and she could get that check. Just take a look at this https://fox5sandiego.com/2019/03/28/north-county-woman-awarded-child-support-from-her-ex-husband-after-50-years/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:44 AM
1

The vast majority of cases are not like that see this https://fox5sandiego.com/2019/03/28/north-county-woman-awarded-child-support-from-her-ex-husband-after-50-years/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:43 AM
1

Don't nut in a woman if you can't support a child even half way. Keep those pants zipped fellas. Why should a man support the child if the woman does not actually need that support? Child support is not needed to keep a child living.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:40 AM
1

So how many kids have you raised on your own with no support from anywhere? No husband, no government assistance, nothing but you and the job you work? That's an ad hominem Let me guess, you're not even a woman are you? That's ok. How many kids, as a single father with no assistance, (not from a girl friend, a wife, the actual mother, the government or anywhere else), HAVE YOU ACTUALLY RAISED. Ad hominem. Use actual logic in debates thanks. SUPPORT A WOMANS RIGHT TO TERMINATE PREGNANCY IN A LEGA…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:39 AM
1

A woman shouldn’t give birth to a baby she can’t support independently. If she does she is not strong and independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 02:21 PM
3

Women are not like how you say they are So women can’t be greedy? Nice try there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 02:20 PM
3

That’s a vast minority of the cases but even then for the man it would be a desire not a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 01:52 PM
2

> How does that help? How does a child support help a woman if she could earn the money herself? She doesn't need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:35 AM
7

I see, That's a very good example and pretty much changed my view, especially about the issues of babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:34 AM
2

So the mother and child(ren) pick up their stuff and walk to another neighbourhood/town/state/province? I don't think so. Literally thousands of homeless people do this everyday in SF where I live. A happy fulfilling life without sex is 100% possible. A life where all you do is avoid starving is not a fulfilling life. Ok I agree with you here. Yeah, look what happens when you bring up a child shittily. He grew up in an affluent, rich household. By all means it proves you dead wrong. Money and a …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:33 AM
4

Moving costs money, dummy. You don't need any money to physically pick up your stuff and move it from one location to another. This is a desire, not a need. It's a need for quality of life and a healthy environment for a child to develop A child will not die without a quality of life or "healthy" environment, the same way a man or woman will not die without having sex. Having capable adults running the world in the next generation is a need. This is obviously proven not to be a need. Donald Trum…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:00 AM
-3

There's no guarantee a job will cover everything. Then she needs to take out things she spends money on that are not needs. Rent and job availability changes dramatically depending on where you live. So you can get a new job and new place to live. You also don't need to pay rent, you can live in a homeless shelter. Paying rent is not need, it's a desire. She might be uneducated, Steve jobs and several college drop outs have become billionaires. You do not need to be educated to make money. Yeah,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 06:45 AM
1

Charities will go bust if all absent fathers stop paying child support tomorrow. Regardless, the woman can get a job or get food stamps. There are a 1000 ways to earn money as a single mother. This post is not intended to advocate against child support, it is simply to argue child support is a woman's desire supported by the state, it is not a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 06:41 AM
-2

Yes, but we think it's fairer if the father pays for these things instead of the taxpayer. Fairer for us. But she does not need child support. It's a desire, "fairness" is a desire for things to be just.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 06:28 AM
1

If you are going to compare the finances required to raise a child to an orgasm Why does she need the money to raise a child? She can get it herself, earn it, or go on food stamps. She can contact tons of charities that help single mothers. No woman needs child support. Nothing is "required". Children grow up in third world countries with just food and water from the earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 06:27 AM
1

Yes but do those things provide coverage for all children and surely you'd agree that they also need funding Again she does not need coverage for her children, she can work and find them food. She does not need it, it's a desire. where do you propose to obtain that? People give to charities of their own free will.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 06:25 AM
-2

You definitely need money to meet some of the basic needs like food and shelter. She can still get those from charities , food stamps, or homeless shelters. Lots of shelters exist specifically for women and single or abandoned mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 06:15 AM
1

like, they literally exist in nature outside of man-made buildings. I know it sounds like a wild concept, but it's true. K, now explain how I can fish without a fishing pole, hunt without a gun, farm without any tools? You really need to try harder at your logic here. Hey, you don't really need healthcare if you take care of yourself. Another wild concept. That's a flat out delusion. Are you that close minded you don't know of diseases like type 1 diabetes or hypothyroidism ? People with functio…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 05:52 AM
1

You don't need it explicitly and specifically in order to live. But you do. You can't buy food or water without money. Neither can you pay for healthcare in America at least. It only makes things more convenient, which is related to desire and not necessity. Unless you can prove all people can live without money, regardless of where they are in the world, it is a need and not a necessity. You are just shifting the goal posts because you don't have a good argument of how someone can live without …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 03:10 AM
1

Can you explain why money isn’t a need in a realistic sense ?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 01:59 AM
1

So you admit your idea of a need is theoretical and not realistic ?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 01:42 AM
1

Work and money are a means to an end. You use them to in order to get those needs fulfilled. There are still other ways to get them fullfilled Like what? However, I would say calling sex a need worse because that could lead to manipulation, entitlement (possibly rape), STDs, and unwanted pregnancies. What?? This makes no sense and is a complete slippery slope. You need to look up some definitions and stop conflating different things, entitlement has nothing to do with a need. I can feel entitled…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:56 PM
0

Yes. And? This would prove your claim false, you can be deprived of something you need or don't need. Deprivation is an action determined by others, so this applies to anything and everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:42 PM
0

True, and as a woman, I doubt you even have that. You should read up on what happens to men who can't get sex sometime though. Not even that, there is no body of men in modern society we know of that have gone long term with no romantic or sexual relationship most of their lives and feel perfectly happy about it. A huge issue of disabled people is they lack the love and romantic relationships they seek from the opposite gender. Even monks and priests seek out sex in some way discretely.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:41 PM
0

You cant be deprived of something you don't need. False. A grocery store owner can deprive a homeless man of food because he does not have enough money to buy food.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:36 PM
0

All of our ancestors fought against other humans in small-scale or large-scale war. Does that make fighting and war a necessity? If your nation is under attack as their's was yes it is a necessity Am I going to die from lack of physical combat? If you do not defend yourself against an attacker yes you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:33 PM
0

Food is a need because you will die without it. You can go your entire life without sex and not die from it, so it is not a need. So by your logic would a job or source of income also not be a need? You don't need to physically possess money to keep breathing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:32 PM
1

but it's been shown that solitary confinement often leads to insanity. Well we also see people that go long term without sex or romantic relationships also don't do well. I believe they are called incels....
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:31 PM
1

I find it creepy when people say "Sex is a need". It's a need in the same way having a job with a livable income is a need. You don't need to work to survive and you didn't work as a child, but ultimately not being able to find a job or support yourself will lead to a very miserable and dysfunctional life. How is it a need when it only pops up after puberty and you still don't satisfy it until some years later? Do you know what testosterone and estrogen are? Surely you understand a negative feed…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:30 PM
0

Well, don't start blatting about the UC if you don't mean the UC. The upper class is a term defined by economists and only economists. Your idea of it is your own and only your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:16 PM
1

conclude that its mens own fault for not likeing them, I never concluded that. That is no where in my post. A lot of strawmen around here....
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:14 PM
1

So you do not understand what she is saying. What she is saying is irrelevant to the observation of different groups and their wealth. It's not applicable to the modern state of who's rich and who's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 12:45 AM
0

Nobody talks about or cares about the getty’s lol. You are just attempting to be elitist. Or your jealous of people who actually had to earn their money.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 10:11 PM
1

Can’t imagine there’s much contact between ordinary men and upper class women. In SI valley there is. There is a large hipster-trendy culture, that brings in both the rich and the hippy-artist types. Yoga studios, organic coffee shops, vegan restaurants, all have both rich and poor people in the same spaces. It's rather unique in that sense. But this is more in San Francisco rather than the east bay or San Jose. And your clients must be very disappointed if you’re bringing that sort of man in to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:51 PM
1

Last I checked this isn't a scientific debate sub? ​ But if you want some articles: ​ https://www.businessinsider.com/dating-successful-women-makes-many-men-uneasy-2018-3 ​ https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/dating-expert-explains-why-it-s-harder-for-successful-women-to-find-love-20180805-p4zvo6.html ​ https://www.matchmakingmiami.com/why-successful-women-fail-at-dating/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:44 PM
0

No, economists denote class based on family and household income.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:40 PM
1

The getty’s are UC, but you do not need to be an oligarch to be UC. By your logic none of the tech billionaires would be considered upper class because they don’t com from generations of wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 05:51 PM
1

That’s a self fulfilling prophecy. You are saying by a virtue of a man being masculine he is not masculine and confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 05:28 PM
2

You are confusing the upper class for the ultra rich. The two are not the same. Otherwise there is no merit in calling it a “class”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 05:27 PM
1

But would the provider have to make considerably more than the woman to be considered a provider or just a nice stable income?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:15 PM
1

He has to make enough for a middle class living or even less, depending on the woman's upbringing or standards. But does that mean he needs to support that middle class living by his own income? In Silicon Valley you would never be able to buy a home just an a $100k or so income. The average home price is now roughly $1.3 million https://move2siliconvalley.com/homes-and-housing/what-do-houses-cost-in-silicon-valley/ There aren't as many female programmers as there are male programmers Not any mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 02:58 PM
1

I don't think most people like someone who looks like they spend money on appearance The girl who regular exercises and wears yoga pants with makeup will always get more male attention then a girl who wears no makeup and doesn’t exercise. Trust me I run a speeding dating group so I have never seen this not be true the majority of the time. It's more like looking naturally good This is a myth in my book. No one is truly naturally good looking. All people, men or women need some amount of self car…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 02:47 PM
1

Isn’t beta bux meaning a scenario where the woman chooses a meek, docile guy primarily based on his income ? In California that would be about the income where women would start to be interested in you because of your money. A six figure programmer doesn’t fly much because there are also lots of six figure women programmers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 02:37 PM
1

There's plenty of meek beta type programmers pulling in six figures without making half a mil. That's the type of beta bux making up most of TRP. But in the area those programmers are in that income wouldn’t be anything special at all. More so most women in software engineering also make 6 figures. I understood “beta bux” to mean a meek, docile guy that the women want to be with because of his money. Correct me if I am wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 02:32 PM
1

You would think so, but being a safe, subordinate husband isn't just about income. When a woman marries a docile man without options that she knows she can control, you're still going to have "beta bux" type dynamics, even if she's not in it for the "bux." I found it funny that the red pill really believes one can still be beta and be able to make big money. I don't know what "bux" qualifies as but at some point to make a truly high income you need to be self assertive and really sell yourself a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 06:15 AM
2

Company pays for 1 room for 2 men, 2 rooms for a man and a woman. I have never heard of a company covering travel and booking opposite gender people in a room together. Though same sex is fairly common. I am only talking about meeting rooms at the office.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 12:35 AM
1

I'm afraid your idea wouldn't pan out in a lawsuit. Nobody's being prohibited from working together. Clearly they are if they can't meet in 1 on 1. I mean you know female managers have males report to them, vica versa. Also are you from the US? You seem a bit not familiar with how employment discrimination works. You can't make decisions in employment openly based on someone's gender, sexual orientation, or race. I don't think a guy and a girl have any business being alone in a closed-door offic…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 10:39 PM
3

How does not having a man and a woman in a closed-door office together violate any laws? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_employment_opportunity You can't say some person can't work with some other person based on their gender. It's no different than saying two homosexuals can't work in the same room together.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 10:14 PM
1

So this is what I don't get about "SMV" and "RMV" here. Does SMV only apply to the people who value you? or does it take into consideration the person being valued actually wants? Like if guy X has lots of morbid obese women interested in him, but no one of an average weight is interested in him, would guy X have a high or low SMV?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 09:10 PM
3

it was our official policy that male and female employees are never alone in a closed-door office. Additionally, any time you call in a female employee for termination or a reprimand, you always have another woman present. I am curious though where your company is located? In the US that would qualify as discrimination by gender and violate equal opportunity laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 09:06 PM
2

It's too bad that personal trainers have the reputation of kinda being douchebags, And thats where 2 and 3 kind of become opposing forces for women. They will see 2, and be attracted toward it, but then think about 3, and make a decision if they want a man based on 2 with the risk of 3 being bad. That's why TRP overestimates things about criminal level bad boys and low class alphas. In reality a man has to counterbalance his stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 01:12 AM
4

Who cares about women getting sexually assaulted? who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 07:18 PM
1

I meant the "women are worthless as people other than as holes to fuck" mentality. how would you even determine that? This seems like more of a witch hunt accusation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:40 PM
1

Not a thing you wrote addresses anything I wrote. Do you not see the quote I made of your comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:32 AM
2

There are so many men out there who think that a woman's only use is sex That has literally nothing to do with "hate". A man and woman commonly find and spend time with one another purely for the purpose of sex, it's called hooking up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:22 AM
0

What is a braincel?? Is it some kind of sub for neuroscientists ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:20 AM
3

On a population level scale, no way in hell, not even close, they are not equal. The demand and desire of men at large for women is astronomically greater than the total demand women have for sex with men. The immensely disproportionate sex work industry toward female workers and male clients is proof enough. That along with the vastly disproportionate tinder matches makes it a given. Now, on an individual level, in specific, just right scenarios, they are about equal. But this requires: A guy a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:19 AM
1

And men definitely get off on women wanting them, and I don't think I'd be wrong in saying if she's not mutally into him, it's a turn off. Maybe not the point that they'll always pass but it's still a turn off. That's a strawman, we aren't talking about women who aren't into men. Men, the vast majority, like to be dominant in the bedroom. They like the idea of doing things to women. Men like the idea of doing something and having it be accepted, rather than waiting and letting the girl do someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:12 AM
1

In my experience running a speed dating group, women will judge a man's profession based on three criteria Income level and affluence. Amount of physical or masculine effort involved. Stereotypes of the profession itself Number 2 here refers to jobs that would signal strength, power or confidence, such as personal trainers, athletes, sports coaches, and possibly contractors. Also running your own business might fall in 2 as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:06 AM
1

> But in general women hit it sooner ​ They do for sure but I think RP overestimates the amount of hot party girls that lose out ultimately.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 08:02 PM
1

I think it's possible tbh. If you're a gigachad that is. Top tier males could fuck 5 different women a day from tinder if they truly were dedicated and lived in a big city. I would still say its only possible or reasonable to a gigachad outside the US. US cities have gotten much more cautious with sexual assault and sexual harassment. Hell even Ronaldo has problems with this. Look it up
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 08:01 PM
1

But at this point you are just speculating right you dong actually know. I am not speculating, the study is based on the question "Have you had sex in the past year?".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 07:58 PM
5

It's a valid question, no point in bringing up problems if you don't have a solution. The question is valid but attempting to suggest the person bringing up the problem is suggesting sex slavery is a straw man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 07:57 PM
1

Really? Only 4%. I feel like the proportion of bi girls I've met is larger than that. Who knows though. Maybe it's regional. Likely california or liberal areas would have more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 03:57 AM
3

upper age limit is 70 I think I just puked up my protein bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 11:52 PM
7

So if that account were 6 months old, you'd suddenly believe what he's saying? No more like if he was a known contributor to PUA forums or the community it would be more believable. Or if he posted some IG account of his or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 11:51 PM
8

In practicality, it's unlikely those 1000 girls would all be attractive. I would opt for 20-30 really hot girls and a couple of 3somes or 4somes. This guy managed to do it That's a brand new account. I wouldn't take any such claims seriously without some sort of evidence or verification.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 10:38 PM
8

I don’t think 1000 is really that outrageous It would be without prostitution or sugar baby setups.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 10:35 PM
1

what's a bloop? Sorry i'm a bit new here
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 10:34 PM
1

Ok so am I mistaken in something then does that not leave 72% of men still getting sex? Once per year, and that's not even considering possible prostitution or trips abroad etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 09:51 PM
3

While that's true, it's not reasonable without evidence to claim that 10% of people 19-29 are sleeping with people over 30. That would be a stretch for the younger slot of 19-23
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 09:47 PM
5

More then half of the men are getting sex them by this, so realistically their is not decline in society or fall or whatever bullshit they are saying. Your not looking at the trend in the article/data In 2008, only 8% of men haven't had sex in the past year. In 2018 28% of men haven't had sex in the past year. The amount of men not having sex is at an all time high. We don't see, based on data that decreasing, only increasing right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 08:00 PM
2

Because I've seen his phone. You realize prostitutes communicate with clients from their phones right?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 06:38 PM
1

I am curious where were these coffee shops? I have also noticed this in palo alto and SF.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:38 PM
0

Also isn't the 3 year stat for long term relationships or marriages? That wouldn't really apply in this case since it just says sex in the last year.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:37 PM
-1

Feel like there should be a focus on the men not turning violent then, don’t you think? China's government actually invests in dating schools for men to prevent what you just said. http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20180521-a-dating-school-for-chinas-many-men
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:18 PM
1

healthy offspring than ugly but smart. Outside of the US though the ugly but smart would have a better chance if he was also wealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:17 PM
3

This including people would rather play video games & porn than hangout with woman . Your assuming a cause to an effect. A man could rather play video games because he believes he has no chance with girls. Or he doesn't think he can get a girl he finds attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:15 PM
1

> how many of those 28% of men and 18% of women do you think are voluntarily celibate, and how many are not? ​ Easily close to 100% of men and probably 30% of the women. That's only if you count people who already haven't had sex in the past year.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:13 PM
8

Force women to have sex with men they don't? That's a fine straw man there :)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:06 PM
2

How many of those women are having sex with each other I wonder? Hard to say. Studies estimate 4% of women identify as LGBT, but they don't go into details on what kind of sex are they having with other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:04 PM
2

He has a bunch of websites and apps he trolls and has some lines he deploys. His strategy is generally to act as pitiful and self hating as possible and see who'll go for it. Someone usually does. If its been a couple of weeks he just flat out lies and claims to be a 30 year old autistic virgin and just fucks worse than usual to keep up the lie. How do you know he isn't paying for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:03 PM
0

The average age disparity in relationships is 3 years. So, for at least some of the 27 - 29 year old women accounted for here, her partner isn't included in the male numbers Ok, but even so, that would give credence to the red pill idea that with age some men do peak later than women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:02 PM
3

The study didn't say that 10% of women were Fucking the same men. You are also making that up. No, it talks about the people within an age group that are having sex or not having sex. I didn't make it up, it's simple math. But my assumption makes more sense than yours. That study concerns people who are aged 18-30. If a woman who is 25 fucks a man who is 32 then she is Fucking someone who is not part of the study. There is no body of evidence to support your claim. With my claim, look here page …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 05:00 PM
1

That men may find it harder to obtain sex isn't new and has always been an issue for them. Right, it’s important to also note this gap was also present in the mid to late 1980’s
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 02:04 PM
2

Do you work for the Catholic Church ? STD stats are way over hyped.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 02:02 PM
8

10 % of women are having sex with older men not that they are sharing the same men. What? That’s not anywhere in the study. Your making that up. That’s an assumption. For every woman who had sex a man also needs to have sex. If the number of women who had sex is higher in one year that means some men have had sexual with multiple women in that year.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 02:00 PM
2

What on earth do you mean a script ? Are you talking about some programming language or video game ?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 08:29 AM
1

A 10% difference? It’s not 10%, read the title of the post. There is 75% more men who did not have sex in the last year in the age of 18-30 than women did. 18% of women vs 28% of men , they are not of the same sampling pool. So this gives credibility, not proof, that a portion of men are having a disproportionate about of sexual partners compared with the majority of other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 08:24 AM
4

Really? Sorry I am still new here
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 06:54 AM
0

Yeah but who's missing out? Not really missing out, but rather giving some credibility to the 80/20 rule. The dead bedrooms in marriage are more concerning. There are a lot more factors that go into that and there are real consequences to it. How so? I would think barriers for people getting married and having kids is more concerning than what happens after they get married and have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 06:54 AM
2

If i had to guess it would be greater if it did not include married people.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 06:52 AM
1

That's actually rather poetic
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 08:26 PM
1

Contrary to what you believe, those women are actually using logic, just not logic that would grant one stable, long term relationships. ​ For every bad boy desire, most women have some reason behind it. A common one is the attraction to rebellion and revenge. A lot of women who really go for the bad boy type do it as a way to get back at their parents, for example. They see the willingness to rebel and be indifferent to authority in men as power and masculinity. ​ But this isn't true for all wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 05:56 PM
1

so you admit your entire post is anecdotal and therefore most likely wrong. This makes no sense. I explicitly stated in the beginning of my post you may observe other scenarios outside silicon valley, but my account is sure as hell 100% accurate for where I live and the people I interact with. Everyone hits the wall. EVERYONE. After understanding the wall is just a synonym for aging, put it this way, not everyone hits the wall before they find all the successful relationships they ultimately wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 05:45 PM
3

If the vast majority of guys are roided out no no no, I mean't the majority of guys in the gym. As in the large fitness culture is based on gaining as much muscle mass as possible. The skinny six pack look won't fly here. To set it straight, I am essentially saying the ultra liberal philosophy and culture creates two dominating social circles. One is where you have big, roided, tatted guys going to EDM festivals and music concerts, taking molly and doing weed. Coachella, crushSF, outside lands. …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 04:31 AM
4

feminist metoo bullshit. It's not that in specific. The metoo stuff only really affects the office, but most people I guess wouldn't see work as a place to date anyways. Masculinity is being criminalized over there, On the contrary, the ultra liberal, wealthy environment actually promotes edgy, rebellious masculinity. What I mean is: Massive gym culture, vast majority of guys work out, high amount of steroid / PED use. HUGE tattoo craze, tons and tons of guys have tattoos, lots of girls do as we…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 03:58 AM
1

The idea that a millionaire is going to blow that much on a first date and be head over heels for you in a way even romance novel guys don't get is ridiculous. But it's very likely the women reacting to that are reacting from a biological urge rather than a rational one. Displays of power and wealth have powerful effects on the subconscious mind. Example: A guy I have worked with, smart SE who works at FaceBook late 20's, got at least 3x more engaging conversations after he bought a rolex watch …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 09:56 PM
2

Really I think this is more proof of the other thing people say about women in regards to high status men. That is to say women who want to fuck high status men will throw out any rational thought. A fucking 29 year old graduate student on a hook up app thought a foreign millionaire was going to sweep her off her feet forever because her bleach blonde ass was just that special. This situation is much more common outside of the US than it is inside. If you look on youtube a lot of girls who try t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 09:50 PM
3

Imagine being offered chocolate every day of your life. In the modern day, this wouldn't even be accurate. Most men, at least in silicon valley do almost zero approaching. This is a prominent issue I have seen in my group and my friends at work. Additionally chocolate is already a qualifier, most general men don't even register for women sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 09:46 PM
1

wtf no what are you even trying to say? The rate at which your telomeres get shorter and your remaining life span shortens can't be expedited. I was just pointing out a common misconception people have that the cosmetics industry loves to exploit. some people spend too much time outside without sunscreen and start getting wrinkles and leathery skin in their early 20s, other people have smooth skin into their 40s. That's not aging, those are changes based on life habits.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 05:16 AM
1

women's appearance undergoes a rapid decline due to age in a relatively short period of time. That's an oxymoron. Aging isn't a rapid process. You can't literally age faster than anyone else. Biologically not possible. Are you talking about an issue like Amy winehouse? She certainly overdid it but she was still physically attractive. She definitely didn't get hagged.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:14 AM
1

but your post makes very little sense. It sounds like either an incel's fantasy or like someone who prefers ghetto women and is trying to rationalize it. What? This is not my opinion, the scenario of smart successful women having issues in finding relationships is a real problem: https://ideapod.com/disturbing-reason-men-dont-want-date-intelligent-women-backed-research/ https://www.suzannevenker.com/relationships/why-strong-smart-successful-women-so-often-struggle-in-love/ https://www.smh.com.au…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:11 AM
1

Not everyone thinks partying at Coachilla is the epitome of fun. The vast majority of highly attractive women that are open to more sexualized relationships definitely are. Or at the very least are into clubbing and partying frequently. The edgy tatted guys you think are top rate aren't. According to what metric?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:09 AM
1

They are against the clock to have kids, they start showing signs of ageing, men relatively start to gather resources to become more valuable I seeeeeeeee. So it's not really like the leftover women concept in asian cultures or the "phd gender" in china. I get it now. But again - the silicon dating market is abnormal and absolutely NOTHING like New York where women outnumber men. If you are an aging average looking woman who wants to marry a guy with a six figure income then by all means Seattle…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 05:58 PM
2

being a good and decent human being. In that case I would say majority of men they end up with would not have virtue much, so no. But then the question is how do you factor in a man that changes after settling down? and then acquires more virtue?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 05:56 PM
1

However, the sub-type of Asian woman you described is not. True high value guys learn very quickly that the ABG sub-type is something to be avoided at all costs. Sure some of them are snobby. You seem to have a very distorted view as to what high quality means (for both men and women). Quality is a subjective term. All I am saying is that women who put effort into their appearance, have an outgoing, excited outlook on sex, and embody a feminine energy will get the most high value men. Women who …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 05:53 PM
1

Sounds like someone's trying to cope hard that the only women he's able to get are low-class trashy women. Is it common for people at ad-hominem in this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 05:51 PM
1

What does virtue mean in this context?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:16 PM
1

This type of woman is the absolute worst. Where are they the worst? They are usually considered quite attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:14 PM
1

that these women do not get high value men. Bingo. They will not be getting the harvard business school educated I-banker who is also 6'4". But they can pair up with a doctor or a lawyer if they lower their standards. These men these Gollum-Waifus end up with, do they have any other good thing going for them other than being hot and making a lot of money? I would say the men they end up with overall are very masculine in energy. It more or less pairs up well with the feminine, sexy persona of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 03:53 PM
2

most men are getting casual sex? Most men are NOT getting casual sex. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/436476-number-of-americans-not-having-sex-reaches-record-high-report Sex is literally at an all time low now. The majority of people, which includes married people are not even having sex once per week.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 03:47 PM
0

Probably because their priority is their careers not their looks. I'm not sure why this bothers men here so much. If this is not your type of woman, just keep it moving. Why heap insults at her because she's making life choices that don't make her attractive to you? What? Nobody is insulting them. I am making an observation they are trying to find men (going to a speed dating meetup) and not managing to find men. That's not opinionated. Or because you can't get the more attractive women you want…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 03:42 PM
7

who red pill guys would deem as a woman of low relationship value, yet she had no issues locking down a high value male with high SMV when she was 25. I can think of at least two other girls like that. Yea this is another thing the red pill get's wrong, it's sounds like a coping fallacy. Real high value guys go for girls who are more feminine, sexual, and outgoing, often like to party or go to music festivals. The idea that top guys choose nerdy quiet girls in the end like never happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 03:39 PM
0

Silicon Valley is one of the most one sided dating markets in the country, of course it doesn’t represent reality I wouldn't say it's the different from other high cost of living areas on the east coast either. age terribly. That’s the wall for them If they got or get the men they actually want how is this the wall? I don't get it. Is the wall just another term for aging?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 03:37 PM
1

Partying (drug abuse and alcohol abuse) is more likely to age people, What does aging have to do with it? I thought the idea of the wall is getting into a scenario where you can't find a life partner or SO that you truly want?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 03:35 PM
1

I work with some high-achieving very attractive women. Read the title of my post. I am specifically saying high achieving unattractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 03:34 PM
2

Yes, Primarily by focusing on building a masculine identity. Working out, getting an edgy hair cut and beard cut, changing up clothing, getting a few tattoos. Numerous things can be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 07:45 AM
1

These women are usually between the ages of 35 to 45 and still look very physically attractive. While you may see some signs of aging such as darkened and aged skin, overall, these women still look very fertile and sexually appealing to men of all ages, more specifically younger men. It's simply called, putting money and time into your appearance. There's nothing special about it. Come around the SF bay area and you will see that all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:57 AM
1

If SMV means physical attractiveness, absolutely 100%. Any woman who does not focus on her appearance at all greatly reduces her chances at attracting men. I have seen this first hand. What if she doesn't want a guy to like her solely based on looks? This is usually a red herring. Women feel chemistry when men desire them and show it. Women do want to be lusted after, but they just want connection to come along with it. What if her personality is awful and she needs some time to work on it? Wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:51 AM
6

I think the real reason is fear of emasculation. "Rejection", is more of a female thing. "Oh, that guy doesn't like me" or "Does that guy like me or not??". To me, and the guys I have worked with, the college social scene lately is very edgy. Tons of guys at parties are ripped and buff, lots of guys are getting tattoos, weed is legal so drug use is pretty rampant. You have to be pretty up to snuff to be seen as cool and masculine. ​ Getting put off or rejected by a girl hurts guys because it tel…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:43 AM
1

Relationships are by nature, natural. Any attempt to force some sort of attraction is fruitless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 01:52 AM
20

I think the issue is there are people who are more shy, unaccustomed, and are not socially experienced which leads them to believe their on the spectrum, and people who are medically diagnosed with some degree of autism. I think the awkward body language, the low physical energy and the lack of a warm demeanor (all of which I have) that comes with the condition is a turnoff to women, That's not autism per say, but anti-social behavior. Real, medical autism is when you have trouble understanding …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 01:50 AM
10

If the woman in question is not over weight, and puts effort into her appearance I don't see at all why not. I run a speed dating group in silicon valley and I have women 30+ come all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 10:00 PM
1

Wanting to have a lot of sex does not equal wanting to have a lot of sex with a lot of people. It is entirely possible to find a woman who is really into sex but only in a relationship. "lot of people" here is a red herring. I believe the post is about how a woman relates to sex, more like she won't be a total freak in bed with one guy if she was vanilla with all the other blokes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 04:51 AM
3

The issue is not the penis anatomy but more so the effects of ejaculation. Men need recovery periods.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 04:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter