| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...as a 6'5" male, you must be constantly hungry, to fuel that large frame...society would frown, fer shur, were you to rape her, but I think we could forgive you the snack, if you chose to eat her. The fauz-designer handbag would be a gagger, but, well, take one for the team, choke it down! edit for typo | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 01:21 AM |
| 2 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...clipping error ;) | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 01:16 AM |
| 2 | This Clinton Portis issue is a MensRights issue. He complains about women being in a men's locker room and is forced to apologize? Are men allowed in a WNBA locker room?sorry, no source..it was back in the early-mid 70's, I was in late grade-school, I remember the first season w women in the change-room, but I can't tell you what year it was offhand, and I'm too damned lazy to wikipedia or Google it. btw, in that first year w women in the locker room, the NFL commissioner dealt w several high-profile sexual-harrassmant cases, of players making lewd comments to the reporters ;) | /r/MensRights | 16/09/10 02:27 AM |
| 35 | This Clinton Portis issue is a MensRights issue. He complains about women being in a men's locker room and is forced to apologize? Are men allowed in a WNBA locker room?If I remember correctly, wonen-reporters in professional sports' locker rooms was a result of a court case. Locker-room interviews had become a very popular source of story-material for video, radio, and print reporters. Women reporters were banned from most locker rooms at the time: it was argued that this created a job-discrimination issue, where female sports reporters were not allowed to compete equally w male reporters. As I recall, women forced their way in with a Federal court order that … | /r/MensRights | 15/09/10 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Don't believe the "1 in 4 women will be raped" myth based on a bullshit study from 30 years ago? Then you're a "rape apologist."k, dug through my boxes of books, found it. 'Moral Panic: Biopolitics Rising', by John Fekete, Robert Davies Publishing, 1994 | /r/MensRights | 07/09/10 03:22 PM |
| 1 | Don't believe the "1 in 4 women will be raped" myth based on a bullshit study from 30 years ago? Then you're a "rape apologist."That was also part of the thesis of the book...almost willful ignorance on the part of media reporters, editors, and the people citing the stats. Also, the NIMH study was not ABOUT the incidence of sexual assault...the stat (1 in 4) was a comment buried in the text to show how rape allegations were dealt with in a situation in which the reliability of the victim can be seen as questionable. These were not proven rapes, just ALLEGATIONS made by inmates. The theme 'Moral Panic' is about how the st… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/10 03:11 PM |
| 28 | Don't believe the "1 in 4 women will be raped" myth based on a bullshit study from 30 years ago? Then you're a "rape apologist."There was a book called 'Moral Panic', about the publication of that study 30 years ago that concluded that a woman in America has a 1 in 4 chance of being raped...Turns out it was not original research, it was a quote of a quote of a quote from a NIMH study of female mental patients at one mental hopspital, with a sample size of about 3 dozen. The book traces the path from the original NIMH study to the story that got wide coverage in the media, and shows how at each step the results were polit… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/10 04:42 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter