| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | HS teacher here, grading a student's paper on Rape Culture.It seems to me that at most this would indicate that the wrong man was identified, not that she wasn't raped. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 11:01 PM |
| 0 | HS teacher here, grading a student's paper on Rape Culture.Did you miss the part where he pretty much says feminism causes rape? What sort of shitty feminazi as you said would side with the men who went to prison. They also would never say that women lie about rape. The essay is highly condescending to everything it claims that feminists have said or done. You say they throw in things to stir up feminists too...okay? So that makes them a troll. Still nothng to support them being feminist. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 05:33 PM |
| 1 | HS teacher here, grading a student's paper on Rape Culture.I was responding to rapey_raperson up there calling OP a feminazi. If that comment was a joke then I missed it. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 08:22 AM |
| 1 | HS teacher here, grading a student's paper on Rape Culture.This is complete bullshit. How would DNA prove that women had been lying about rape years later? If semen or hair or whatever samples were collected at the time of the rape, then you could later prove that the man in prison wasn't the one who raped her, but how would that prove that she lied? That would just prove that they gpt the wro.g man. Really though, would they even collect any DNA if they had no DNA testing? I mean what DNA proves that a woman wasn't raped years later? | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 08:17 AM |
| 1 | HS teacher here, grading a student's paper on Rape Culture.The essay is pretty heavily anti-feminist. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 08:02 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter