TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rockidol Archive

View 0 posts and 448 comments by rockidol on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

There are no “woke masters”. Seriously what the hell are you talking about
/r/MensRights09/02/21 05:50 PM
1

This isn't hatred against men. Saying someone is privileged in this context isn't saying they're a bad person. The basic idea is that there's bullshit and unfairness that a woman has to put up that men don't, and if you're saying men are privileged and women aren't you're saying that all else being equal a man has an easier time in life than a woman. It's not saying that a homeless man has an easier time than a rich woman, it's saying that if the homeless man was magically changed to be a woman …
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:36 PM
1

Watch the John Oliver video on bias against women in healthcare. He doesn't use the word privilege or act like men should feel guilty or a part of the cause. He's just talking about a serious issue that affects women.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:31 PM
1

That is not at all what privileged means in this context. It's not that white people suck, it's that in Canada there's some racist bullshit non-whites have to deal with but whites don't. The idea is that if you took a homeless white man and made them black their life would be a bit harder. It's not that the white homeless man is a bad person or that they have an easier life than Will Smith.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:28 PM
1

You should try asking a priest
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:09 PM
4

and you can't expect people to provide sources for you constantly You make a claim, you back it up.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:54 PM
6

You got a source?
/r/MensRights08/01/18 10:17 PM
8

The US link doesn't mention gender anywhere.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 07:27 PM
2

Male privilege doesn't mean men are never treated unfairly or whatever. Male and female privilege can exist simultaneously
/r/PussyPass06/07/17 02:30 AM
6

It's not a zero sum game you know
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:23 PM
1

This may be an extremist or it may be someone trying to get hits through outrage. Since they claim to think the prison system must have been designed for men because there's more men in it, I'm guessing the latter. Poe's law in action
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:06 AM
10

Any examples u care to share?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:01 PM
1

The most blatant ones are the ones who repeat that dumbass Atwood quote about how men fear women will laugh at them and women fear men will kill them. You know for sure they wouldn't accept a man as an expert on how women think and yet...
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:12 AM
4

It's cosmo, they're less of a feminist rag and more of a tabloid clickbaity rag.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:00 AM
10

Real talk, supporting Trump for what Trump haters do is stupid. You can dislike him and his haters at the same time if you that's how you feel, but you should base your support on Trump off of what Trump says and does, nothing else.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:38 AM
2

/r/PussyPass and /r/pussypassdenied have always been alt-right shit holes It used to just be about showing how men are discriminated against in the justice system. I haven't been on the sub in a while but the rules have changed recently.
/r/PussyPass23/02/17 12:30 AM
4

If they're willing to watch you can show them the Penn and Teller: Bullshit episode about circumcision. It has footage from circumcision that's painful to watch amongst arguments about why it's pointless at best and harmful at worst. Edit: It might be better to not come at them from a moral argument, so you could show them this article and it's part about circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:11 PM
1

Hey let's be fair maybe she'd be against preferential treatment towards women too.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 12:13 AM
11

Yeah, I'm saying that just because SJWs hate something doesn't mean it's good.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 11:55 PM
7

I mean they also hate the Westboro Baptist Church so...
/r/MensRights29/12/16 11:15 PM
-2

If looks were 80% of the job then Megan Fox would be way more respected as an actress.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:36 PM
17

Google is not 40 years old, they are not part of some STEM conglomerate where they need to take responsibility for others' actions. Having a preference for a certain gender is discrimination and if they've been discriminating against women have them pay a fine or something and then treat men and women equally. Discriminating against men isn't right and is unfair to the male applicants.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:34 PM
7

Why do they need to do anything to promote women in comp sci, and how is this not discrimination?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:06 PM
1

Says who?
/r/PussyPass15/12/16 05:31 AM
2

The amount of feminists who rail against pornography really isn't all that high. Oh sure you'll find some feminists who are against specific types of porn or don't like it when porn portrays women a certain way, but if you're talking feminists who just blanketly dislike all porn and think it needs to be stopped, they're very few and far between.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 10:21 PM
1

It may not be just because he's a man, but because he's laughing about it and finding it humorous. My general rule of thumb is that if the victim isn't taking it seriously then why should I (because if they aren't taking it seriously it's no big deal to them).
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:51 PM
1

It's possible for men and women to be systematically disadvantaged in different ways, even by the same government.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 10:53 PM
4

To be fair the M and M one was a shitty tumblr meme, the skittle one was said by the adult son of the Republican nominee for president (and for the record I'd think they'd still focus on it if it was Chelsea Clinton instead of Trump Jr)
/r/MensRights20/09/16 11:27 PM
3

Well duh of course feminists hate M and Ms, the M stands for Men and there's TWO OF THEM. Something something patriarchy, masculinity, we're the oppressed people so it doesn't count when we do it. Ok in all seriousness it just amazed me how people didn't recognize that this logic could be used to justify other forms of bigotry.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 11:18 PM
2

Perhaps it's just something for feminist sites to write about on slow news days.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 02:55 AM
0

Can you undo an castration? If not then it shouldn't be done in case someone gets wrongfully convicted (among other reasons).
/r/MensRights28/08/16 08:02 PM
2

What made you against it? For me it was seeing the Penn and Teller: Bullshit episode about it.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:53 PM
7

Doctors today encourage circumcision With the exception of parts of Africa where condoms are not readily available, there is no major medical body that recommends routine male circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:52 PM
1

Then how did Bobbit survive?
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:49 PM
1

I honestly can't tell if this is a pun or an honest question.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:45 PM
2

That seems kind of paranoid to me.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 08:36 PM
2

They're still human, they're not demons put on the Earth to oppose everything good. And if you want more "I can't believe I agree with these guys" the KKK hates the Westboro Baptist Church
/r/MensRights17/08/16 05:16 PM
2

Some women do care about men's issues though.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:33 AM
1

Bill Gates doesn't work for Micorsoft anymore, outside of his charity work the dude is retired. He really doesn't have to give a shit what people on the internet think of him.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 07:41 PM
0

There are actual legit charity issues that only women are affected by. Louis CK was on celebrity jeopardy recently and his charity helped prevent women from dying or getting serious health complications from childbirth. Stuff like that I don't think anyone should have a problem with but if it's say a charity that only helps women with breast cancer and refuses to help men then yeah screw them, you probably shouldn't give them money.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 05:08 PM
-7

Some of the soldiers in WWII were volunteers doing a job that women could do but weren't allowed to do, so that's privilege. Others were drafted and forced into it, something that women didn't have happen to them. So it's really an example of both privileges if you want to get technical.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 11:25 PM
1

So you think some people are genetically predispositioned to crime?
/r/MensRights30/05/16 10:07 PM
1

It's talking about discrimination against people based off how they were born not what they as individuals did
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:56 PM
4

Zootopia One of the protagonist is a male that is very clever, and it has a message not ot discriminate out of fear. The obvious parallel is with Muslims but it'll work for women afraid of men.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 08:28 AM
7

Not every instance of violence against men is misandry. If this were really anti men she wouldn't like the new Asian man that just came out of the wash.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:31 PM
1

Raise a stink in the media, report the people sending him threats to the police. And if you really want to fight dirty accuse her of targeting him because he's black.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:47 AM
1

Source for the stuff about the reporter?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:41 AM
0

That they're exploited, that they wouldn't be doing this if they didn't really need the money. Come to think of it you can say the same thing about adults who work as Mcodnalds chefs. But either way not every porn star is desperately in need of money.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 04:57 PM
1

Critiquing feminism can actually get you banned, even if the criticism is over a specific feminist policy that demonstrably harms men and boys. That hasn't been my experience. But it would be nice to have a subreddit for discussing men's issue where no one can get into a "feminism sucks, no MRAs suck" shouting match.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:52 AM
3

Power Structures. The official feminist cop out for every double standard they have. I complain about sexism while doing sexist things? It's not really sexism because power structures Not biting? Well yeah I complain about kitchen jokes then jokingly call myself a misandrist and defend jokes about men as punching up but it's different because power structures.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:47 AM
0

He has an argument it's just not an accurate one.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:44 AM
6

Then, of course, contemporary countries that DO ban porn include such utopian bastions of female equality like Iran and Saudi Arabia while countries with widespread, freely-available porn include such backwards hell-holes as the Netherlands and Germany. This is just guilt by association. If the backwards hell holes had porn legalized and 1st world countries did not, it'd still be a bad thing to censor porn. Edit The anti-porn people on the left never talk about the vast variety of gay porn becau…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:32 AM
7

"pornography is the humiliation and degrdation of women" Pornography is literally just sex on camera (or masturbation or sexual nudity, or a drawing/statue/whatever of those things). To say it's all degrading betrays either a lack of understanding of what pornography is, or a viewpoint that sex (including lesbian sex or sex between men) is degrading to women. By the way pretty much everything you see in porn done to women you can also see done to men (if body parts allow for it). So if it's degr…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:31 AM
2

That's a pretty prejudiced thing to say. Not all white women are entitled
/r/MensRights22/08/15 02:50 AM
1

'you're telling them that boys having a distraction free environment is more important than her education' So girls need to dress a certain way before they are capable of learning anything. What a unique mental handicap. Obvious bullcrap aside, and putting aside the fact that dress codes apply to men as well, this is still really stupid. What's easier getting a person to change their clothes or telling all the hormonal teenagers to repress their natural desires for sex? It's pretty selfish to sa…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 02:46 AM
0

Men have no breasts, Fat men do.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:54 PM
–

If I give you an unwanted shoulder massage while moaning I'm pretty sure I could be in for sexual assault/harassment/whatever. But the point is it's still a right men have that women don't.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:42 AM
7

Unless they're a stuntman or a monk.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:39 AM
–

They aren't sex organs, their primary purpose is to nurse children. If you really want to be technical, having a sexual attitude about breasts is nothing but an extremely common fetish.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:36 AM
–

To be fair sometimes men do have the right to run around topless but women don't. But in the US at least, that's it.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:25 PM
2

This reminds me of the programs in the South, designed to give special treatment to religious schools. But the moment they're told "you can't only do this to Christian schools, you have do this to Muslim and Satanist schools as well". they cancel the whole thing.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:22 PM
3

Fuck the whole sex offender registry. It just makes things worse.
/r/PussyPass15/07/15 05:15 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:57 PM
8

Just look at the difference in male and female prison populations I don't think these are caused by laws but by unconscious biases in judges because men are thought of to be more violent/dangerous.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:33 PM
9

A few of them are campaigning for it but they haven't succeeded anywhere. Not that jail is the only possible consequence of a blackmail charge.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:04 PM
-23

That seems kind of paranoid, and Chad could bust her for blackmail.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:36 PM
4

A voice about how she got death threats (which she did), and nothing else. He did not endorse anything she said about games, nor was she given a chance to speak her views about games. It'd be like if the head of PETA was put on the news because she robbed to talk about the robbery (and nothing else). That wouldn't mean the news is endorsing peta.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:03 PM
3

But he didn't give her a voice about video games. He did not let her say anything about what makes games sexist or what she doesn't like. She quoted her talking about the threats she's been getting and that's it.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:52 PM
11

"We’re not trying to exclude boys." Yes you are. You may not like admitting this and that may not be your motivation but that's what you are doing.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:42 PM
5

Would it be possible to sue the government for violating that act?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:38 PM
11

John never said she was right about video games. He said paraphrased 'she talks about what she sees as sexism'. That's a pretty neutral way of talking about her. She was literally only on as an example of online harassment victims and he said nothing about video games.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:34 PM
3

Your own link (which I thought was posted by someone else) says that 13% of young men get harassed vs. 25% of young women. That's not even close to 3 vs. 100. If you'd actually look at the outdated Maryland study you'll find that it only includes messages from chat rooms, people who don't go to chat rooms might not get that kind of response. But yeah you did respond by saying the segment was only about sexual harassment but they did segments on violent non-sexual threats so that's crap. And you …
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:32 PM
1

Is it though? Because if it's 1000 uncoordianted people each sending him an individual message saying "you suck" I wouldn't call that harassment.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:20 PM
6

Look up swatting. It's when trolls call the police saying there's someone with a gun at your house holding people hostage, so that the police sends a swat team to the target house. It's not something that happens only to men but you can see it happening to men.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:19 PM
12

If it was only about sexual harassment he wouldn't have talked about death threats.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:11 PM
1

It would be hard to make a career out of killing yourself I imagine. But you can have a lucrative career out of almost killing yourself.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:10 PM
3

I'm not trying to convince anyone, that would be a complete waste of my time. Oh so just talking to people calling them idiots and ignoring all the studies they post that counteract your view ISN'T a waste of time. Seriously what kind of fucking moron thinks that sticking their fingers in the ears and shouting "I can't hear you, you're all stupid" is a good use of their time?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:09 PM
5

Oliver's segment was specifically about online SEXUAL harassment Is that why the video is titled online harassment and not online SEXUAL harassment and why he talked about death threats?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:06 PM
2

He said that those comments were not harassment though.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:21 PM
1

there is the issue of motherhood I've yet to read the whole thing but I assumed she meant pregnant women. Although if you want to have a separate standard for pregnant women vs. everyone else be my guest, although in the end they should still serve the same amount of time.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:36 AM
1

What makes you think they are? The one example I could think of was the treatment of a certain feminist's critique about video games. Long story short she got the usual flak and empty threats from internet trolls and the media focused on that to paint her as an innocent wholesome victim while ignoring her critics that weren't being assholes. I used to think that was the media being super feminist but the thing was, all the articles from the mainstream media weren't really interested in what she …
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:03 AM
2

Someone's who's pushing THIS hard for "believe rape accusations without evidence" is probably guilty of making a false accusation.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:32 PM
1

They're not teaching it, this is just a guest speaker.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:31 PM
1

I think the best way to counter this bullshit from feminists is to remind them that lynch mobs were a huge problem back in the day and frame them as being anti-black people.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:01 PM
-4

Look I think some feminists unfairly demonize male sexuality but I've never hear them call staring at a woman rape culture.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:45 PM
-2

Bullcrap, he's only tried to go after assault rifles and he couldn't succeed in doing that.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:44 AM
7

Men have done nothing to change capitalism? Has this dumbass ever heard of Marx, or Lenin or does she think they were women? Some men want to get rid of capitalism and some men want to keep it, same goes for women. I'm sure you've heard of Ayn Rand right? Saying men have the power to change things is meaningless garbage when being men doesn't mean they'll share an opinion and they can't link minds to get something done. What matters is what the people want to do and what they believe, not their …
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:44 AM
2

To say that men have it hard is a total injustice to feminists. It's not, you can say they both have it hard but for different reasons. The world isn't black and white where one gender is suffering while the other has 0 problems.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:37 AM
4

I haven't read the whole thing but one thing caught my eye. male homosexuals are above female homosexuals How? No seriously name one way gay men are "above" lesbians. I can't think of anyone who dislikes gay women more than gay men or vice versa (unless they have a problem with men or women in general).
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:35 AM
70

Let them harass, insult, berate, and threaten you just because you wore a shirt. And if they're stupid enough to threaten you over social media you can get them in trouble for it.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 10:56 PM
33

During lunch, a huge feminist comes up to me and asks how it feels to be a fucking asshole. I would've responded: "feels better than being a feminist", just to piss her off. I don't even feel that way, but I figure if they're not going to try, why should you?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 10:55 PM
167

. Then one of my teachers said she wouldn't answer any of my questions when I wear my shirt. If this is true, complain to the principal, ESPECIALLY if you're in a public school. This would be discrimination based off political beliefs.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 10:54 PM
4

Women are oppressed. Men are just also oppressed. Is anyone else sick of how often people use "oppressed"? I mean seriously it's a term that used to be used to describe people who live under authoritarians and have their basic human rights denied. Now it just means "sometimes suffers from double standards". It sucks but come on it's not oppression, not in the way we describe dictatorships.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:26 AM
2

Child custody laws are not written just by feminists, that's why you have cases of male rapists getting parental rights to the child.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:24 AM
1

They are serious. It's not something deliberate it's an oversight. There are some places that say 'the father has such and such rights', and the rapist is still 'the father'. No asterisk saying "but not in case of rape". That's the oversight.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:22 AM
2

If you have parental rights you have parental responsibility And the courts should not sever that without deep consideration. Then shouldn't you be able to waive those rights and accept no responsibility? Isn't that why we have a foster child system?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:21 AM
1

"but women are like totally oppressed and stuff". I'm so sick of this attitude that only one group can be oppressed, only one group can have privileges. There can be a law that discriminates against men and at the same time a different law that discriminates against women (I'm not saying there is, it's just an example). This doesn't prove women don't have it rough, all it proves is that men sometimes get fucked over by the government in a way women don't. It should be stopped, that's all that ma…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:20 AM
2

Did that guy say being hit in the nose might make it go into his brain?
/r/PussyPass27/11/14 11:55 PM
1

This video was a recruitment poster for staying single, watching porn and jerking off when you have a biological need and telling the females of this country to literally go fuck themselves. That's stupid. Even if there was no double standards there would still be abusers. Even now there are ways for men to deal with their abusive partners. What could we do, boycott pussy until this changes? You expect non-abusive women to be responsible for the abusive ones?
/r/PussyPass03/10/14 12:36 AM
1

It's been redefined to essentially a synonym with masculinity. No it's a synonym for gender roles or an imaginary force that makes every gender roles in existence. Seriously they act like killing this thing will get rid of every double standard even those that hurt men.
/r/PussyPass03/10/14 12:32 AM
1

Meet people in places where most of the girls there share your hobbies. Well where do you go?
/r/seduction02/06/14 07:01 AM
0

Is that guy related to Sun Tzu (the guy who wrote the art of war)?
/r/seduction26/04/14 03:22 PM
4

I said women's lower levels of rationality may be rooted in biology Where's the evidence that they even have lower levels of rationality?
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 07:28 PM
2

Why would you want to? You'd be fucking knocked out.
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 06:32 PM
1

Because OP is psychic and knows what the sentence will be /s.
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 06:29 PM
4

Lesson: If you get attacked by a crazy woman. Report her first.
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 06:20 PM
3

"shame men who are physically unattractive" is a stretch They make jokes about people being ugly, but that's not the same as calling them bad people. Plus it's not like they only attack ugly men.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:34 AM
0

It is feminism that turned the word fathers into a mere option. Meaning what? while ensuring that this new paradigm rested firmly on the back of the male gender role -- warrior and workhorse. How? And as for why I posted that, nobody keeps a mental list of the rational people they met who fit under whatever group. It's like asking me to name a rational dr. who fan or whatever. I know they exist, I don't know any personally so I can't actually list any.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:18 PM
-4

There are a substantial number of MRAs who aren't like TRP. Where are the good feminists? Word for word there's people who make the same argument about MRA's.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 01:02 AM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/11/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742.html
/r/MensRights30/01/14 12:57 AM
5

Hell I've seen a ton of feminists claim that the rate is between 2-8% So even they admit that it happens.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 02:08 AM
20

accusation without evidence is false accusation. Not how it works. The lack of evidence doesn't prove they were lying or even that they were wrong.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:41 AM
-2

The only reason boys aren't brought up in this article is because it's about a girl.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:32 AM
1

Stoner isn't a word either according to firefox.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:27 AM
1

hate crime laws were put in place to keep minorities from being oppressed by the majority, And the equal protection clause requires that they be enforced should a majority get oppressed by a minority.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 07:55 AM
3

I think rape jokes can be funny (I like dark humor, sue me), but if you tell them when people are trying to have a serious discussion about rape (like right now), you're probably an asshole.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 05:17 AM
3

Fair enough, but does that mean SRS should stop complaining about murder jokes altogether?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:50 PM
4

Yes, but there's no consistency in saying that "joking about rape is bad but not murder, joking about hating females is fine but not males"
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:26 PM
-28

After awhile, a sense of futility sets in, and the idea is to make men feel the way women feel when they read upvoted comment after comment of crap. And then trying to pretend this doesn't make you hypocrites.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:33 AM
0

These are not comparable to slurs or hate against marginalized groups So what does that mean they're suddenly OK?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:30 AM
-17

Either jokes are harmful to society or they aren't. You are being a fucking hypocrite when you make anti-male jokes and complain about misogyny. This is the same group that says patriarchy/society hurts men.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:28 AM
-1

This happened after QWEP's post so he/she said that insane bullshit before that. Some perspective. And a guy trying to trigger someone when he believes triggering isn't a thing is the equivalent of an atheist praying for someone to get hurt. They don't think it'll actually do anything.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:05 AM
-2

Is it a crime? Yes. Should it be considered a hate crime? No, because whites aren't oppressed The victim was clearly being oppressed, and if they were beating him up because he was white then they were trying to oppress him for his race.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:45 AM
0

Stewart Lee is also a hypocrite for the same reason. Unless you want to pretend that sexist jokes are harmful but sexist satire isn't.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:42 AM
3

I have nothing of value of add to this conversation so please upvote me for a joke someone else made -AFlatCap
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:26 AM
9

You are no better than your Muslim counterparts who stone women for being whores, or mutilate their genitals. You are no better than men who beat and rape women under the idea that women should be subservient because of the bible. So tossing around the word cunt is on the same level as raping women?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:19 AM
-9

Oh yes you fucking do, No you fucking don't. Reddit is like a steaming cesspool of bigoted thought, worming its way into the hearts and minds of this nations young, giving them a vitriolic cancer of hatred against women, against homosexuals Just because you can't read those jokes without fostering hatred doesn't make it true for the rest of us.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:16 AM
2

Hey man don't drag down the National Enquirer that thing is legit journalism. Haven't you ever seen Men In Black? And yeah you're right the burden of proof is on the other guy. Like I said, I was bored.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 06:01 PM
2

I don't know of any, I'm just saying you didn't really make a good counter either (I was bored).
/r/MensRights16/01/12 10:09 AM
2

Your whole point was that because historically men have been in charge then there's no way they can be teaching anti-male things in schools right now.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:44 AM
3

My psych textbook actually supported the claim that video games cause violence, and used a bullshit paper thing that compared it to cigarettes and cancer in how certain the link was (one that's been pretty thoroughly debunked), ignoring all the studies that say the opposite. I know it's not a gender issue but still I told my teacher about it and gave him some counter studies and whatnot. He didn't dismiss them or anything but I don't know if anything came of it.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:41 AM
4

not really
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:38 AM
5

I wouldn't. If some actress said that to Bruce Willis or one of the other male stars of RED, I would assume there would be laughter too.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:38 AM
2

domestic murder? Don't they have to live with each other for it count as that?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:38 AM
1

Not even close to the same thing. This is just disgusting.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 03:34 AM
7

If a ship is sinking then everyone on board is now in need of assistance.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 07:18 PM
15

It should be gender neutral, other than that don't see a problem.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 07:17 PM
2

I've seen someone give a counter to that study that I saved, but I didn't save the name of the person who posted it so I don't know who to give credit for for this Participants are asked to imagine themselves in place of the man described in the scenario. After each of the scenarios, the participants are asked three questions: “How sexually aroused would you have felt in the above situation?,” “Would you have behaved like this in this situation?,” and “How much would you have enjoyed getting you…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 08:48 AM
1

Absurd prison sentences sometimes happen in the U.S.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 06:57 PM
2

Not unless he forced her to give the false accusation. If I persuade you to rob someone, it's still you doing the robbery.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 06:57 PM
1

I don't watch Law and Order, because every single show has very similar plots only they swap out the crimes (sometimes going for sick and rare crimes for shock value). I do have to give them credit for being neutral on these things though.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 06:55 PM
5

Dave Chapelle was joking, Kramer was not, he called the guy a nigger out of anger. And I don't think Chapelle is racist, I'm just sick of the hypocrisy of "white jokes are OK but not black jokes" coming out of SRS.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 09:24 PM
3

It's still an ad hominem and it's still hypocritical to think anti-privileged jokes are OK but not anti-marginalized.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 09:01 PM
4

Oh fuck off troll, even feminists admit that a man can be part of a marginalized group. Although it's amusing to see you clowns try to justify hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 07:52 PM
1

A few recently but those were only recently. I used to read the site a lot more and can't remember much of them.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 05:55 PM
0

you denounce them as 'sanctimonious assholes'. He was denouncing a subreddit, not all trans people.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:26 AM
1

How is kotaku an outrage factory?
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:17 AM
8

Joke my aching foot, we all know you were serious, or at least trolling. But fine if you think that "joke" is OK does that mean you'll stop complaining about jokes other people make about gays or woman or any non-white race? Or are you just a massive hypocrite?
/r/MensRights27/12/11 12:54 AM
2

Don't forget teefs calling white people a plague race. She seriously tries to defend her bigotry with 'it's different because I'm a minority attacking a majority' You gotta wonder if their brains are hollow or something.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:45 AM
1

If they were expecting/wanting children I think you should tell them so they don't get their hopes up. Then you can tell them that you'd adopt if you really wanted kids, so that it's not entirely off the table. I don't know, I'm saying this knowing that if I told my parents they wouldn't freak out or try to guilt trip me or anything, so your mileage may vary.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:19 AM
1

"However, one of the dangers is if alternative responses get used by defence lawyers to minimise the violence that has been done, and look for lesser sentences for offences that are very serious" That's literally their job. To get their defendants ruled innocent, and if they can't do that to minimize their sentence.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:16 PM
2

"this was only tolerated because the inmates were men". No. We cannot make that assumption. Some people just become abusive assholes when they have power over people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:12 PM
-1

Ok the title of this post is complete bullshit. "girls should learn some men still hold old-fashioned views about women." That is true, some men do think like that. She isn't saying that all or most men think like that, but some do. This is a non-issue.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:09 PM
1

Here's how you should reply What made Casey Anthony want to murder her daughter? Her daughter must've been a real monster. Or maybe murderers are just evil people. If you're really pissed. "That's like saying the Jews must've done something evil for the Nazis to want to kill them. Sometimes murderers are just evil people." The second one is a much worse analogy I'll admit but it drives the point home further. Or if she's a feminist you could go with: "That's like saying that domestic abuse victi…
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:55 AM
14

This is Yahoo Answers. It is very very easy to make a new yahoo email account then use that to post troll questions or very stupid questions. It could easily be a fake. "women must always cheat on men" Yeah that sounds like someone posing as an idiot rather than an actual idiot.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:50 AM
3

Great. Now let me know if they'll apply the same standards to women.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:47 AM
1

I think you should consider telling your parents at least if they were expecting grandchildren. You don't really need to tell your friends. I'd tell my close friends if I got one. That's me though. And if you do want children you can adopt.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:36 AM
3

Was she in the process of strangling the son or did he strangle her after the fact? If it's the second one, it's murder and he deserves to be charged with it. That being said he does deserve a lesser sentence than someone who murders for financial gain, or for fun (which he appears to be getting). I've seen situations where the reverse happened and the woman was still charged. A girl beat her (male) molester to death (not in self defense), and was still convicted anyway.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:25 AM
2

If/When you find a feminist saying that or taking this woman's side than that would be a good post for mensrights. As it is, it's just another story of some woman committing a horrible crime which isn't unheard of.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 06:13 PM
2

"This story is in mens rights because it shows how women think they are in the right when they abuse men." And men who abuse women, children or other men often think they're in the right as well.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 05:48 PM
2

Why is this on MensRights? I could understand if she was getting off lightly but she's not. I know the old excuse is "to show that women aren't all saints". Well after the Casey Anthony ordeal most people think that a woman killed her own daughter, so I don't think that holds up.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 05:45 PM
2

"so now its not mutilation if its an adult? " It is, but adults can do whatever they want with their own body. Hell they could cut the whole thing off if they wanted to.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:36 AM
2

"At this point the adult would not be able to endure the procedure." There are lots of stories, even on reddit of men over 18 getting circumcisions.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:34 AM
1

I read their thread and their logic seems to be "Wall Street makes people poor." "Poor people have a higher chance of being victims of domestic violence" "Wall Street is responsible for domestic violence". Being poor does not cause someone to be a victim of domestic violence. Having an abusive partner does. To shift the blame from the abuser is just wrong.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:23 AM
5

It's their definition of violence against women. It includes "getty a shitty paycheck" apparently.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:20 AM
3

Getting a shitty salary is not violence. It never will be violence, and just because you think Wall Street is evil does not mean you get to lie about them.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:16 AM
0

The clothesline shirts were made by real victims, they're even color coded to what they were victims of. But lying about statistics should not be acceptable.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 06:54 AM
2

Blame the Doctor. Unless something interfered with the surgery, or they were going off bad information, the doctor should always be blamed for medical mishaps. No exceptions!
/r/MensRights21/11/11 06:35 AM
4

Reality TV makes backstabbing look more frequent than it is regardless of gender. It's not some sinister plot, backstabbing creates instant drama so whenever there is backstabbing they like to play it up as much as they can for ratings.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 06:24 AM
3

What do you mean they don't know how to be men? They can be as feminine or as masculine as they want and they'd still be men. Same goes with women.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 06:03 AM
2

"Men don't have to carry a baby for nine months and shouldn't be able to control women's bodies." Nobody's arguing they should (well ok some are but they're a small number) the idea is that because women have many options to financially cut themselves off from a baby the men should have some too.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:46 PM
-2

Are you people fucking idiots? Seriously, if they had their way women would not be sent to jail and men would still be sent to jail. They are not advocating that jails stop opening, they are advocating that ONLY WOMEN not be sent to jails. That's like "oh hey, I think it should be a constitutional right for male felons to vote" "So you'd be OK with female felons not having that right" "How could you say such horrible things?!"
/r/MensRights31/10/11 12:39 AM
-1

Men and women are being sent to jail. They are advocating that women (and only women) not be sent to jail. Therefore they are advocating that men be sent to jail and not women.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 12:22 AM
11

She really blames men for women who abort their daughters? That makes no logical sense. I mean yeah some of them may feel pressure but at the end of the day a woman is the one making that decision (in the U.S. at least).
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:44 PM
-3

Advocating that men be sentenced to jail and women not is called sexism (amongst other things).
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:28 PM
2

He's a troll. And not only that he's a troll impersonating someone else. So everything he says is going to be stupid and/or hateful and/or insane. Best to ignore him, he's not trying to contribute anything, just trying to make someone else look bad (and it's not working).
/r/MensRights30/10/11 08:06 AM
1

Who says I do? But he's at least quoting a news paper and not just going "nuh uh, you're wrong".
/r/MensRights30/10/11 04:14 AM
1

I love how morons like you don't make any actual argument it. You just come in here, declare it crap, and expect us to believe you for no reason.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 03:51 AM
3

"it's about controlling male sexuality. " It's about controlling sexuality period. Male prostitutes exist and there's probably lesbians who want to buy sex.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 03:49 AM
2

What time does he start talking feminists and whatnot. It's a long video and he doesn't go into it right away.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:01 AM
8

So she has a preference for circumcised men. Who cares. That's not the same thing as demanding baby boys get circumcised.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 02:48 AM
1

Assure her that you wouldn't do something like that, and that the people (use a gender neutral word) who do that to the people they love, are rare compared to those who don't (don't know how to word this to a child).
/r/MensRights28/10/11 02:39 AM
1

This is the hardest episode to watch but sad thing is this isn't even the most disgusting episode of Bullshit I've ever seen. That honor goes to the Ground Zero episode (it's totally unrelated to gender issues but it's worth seeing).
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:47 AM
1

They never call for it to be banned but they do call it barbaric, unnecessary and all that jazz.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:29 PM
1

Radical fundies can justify anything. Fundies usually do not operate on logic so that's how they justify it.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 10:05 PM
1

Did he follow her around or were they just passing? Do you have a news story?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 12:48 AM
0

Nice straw man, thanks for the link although even if that's correct it still means that the phrase "men can stop rape" is BS.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 10:31 PM
0

99% of rapes is bullshit and you know it. And you must be seriously dense if you don't recognize the old tactic of "apply someone else's faulty logic to something else and see the result"
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:17 PM
1

We might not be the dominant species, and if we still were then we'd later evolve to not have that ability. But if every man had that ability tomorrow, it would be great.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:01 AM
6

It doesn't. Comedians talk shit about the sexes all the time.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 01:21 AM
2

"as women arguably already have sexual freedom" Not all women have access to birth control. There's the poor and then there's the teens who can't sneak it part their disapproving parents.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 01:15 AM
-1

No. You can still feel higher emotions after that.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:49 AM
2

That is officially THE stupidest thing I have ever heard EVER. Are we sure this isn't a mistranslation? Are we sure this is an adult who was saying that? Maybe it was two kids in a suit. Maybe it was an impersonator trying to make her look stupid. It makes more sense than her claims.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:58 PM
2

That'll work.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:52 PM
7

This has to be fake. I mean she just decides to divorce him in the span of a few posts over him feeling a little emotionally distant. Not believable.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:48 PM
4

I don't even know how you would emotionally rape someone. I'm not saying it's impossible, but fuck if I know where to start.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:44 PM
3

Better, I guess, I'd drop the "only" though, I don't know it still sounds a bit obvious (I mean who else but humans are going to prevent rape)? Yeah I don't know what phrase to use.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:32 PM
-1

I know it's not the intention but it still sounds like "it's your fault you were raped". May I suggest rewording it.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:20 PM
1

Cite an example.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:11 PM
1

Then don't check out a room with a man. I don't know about you but I've never interacted with my neighbors when I was at a hotel and they never tried to interact with me.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:10 PM
4

He did not, he said they would've been called pussies when he was a kid (and given his age, he's probably right). By the way implying that he's wrong about this because he's wrong about bullying is an ad hominem fallacy.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:00 PM
5

"Only you can prevent rape" That sounds disturbingly close to "it was your fault you were raped".
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:57 PM
11

First thing that showed up when I googled the term. "emotional rape is the theft of someone's higher emotions, such as love, without consent. However, in the case of emotional rape the lack of consent is contained in the fact that the individual is being lied to by the perpetrator. " It didn't look like a mainstream site so it's probably an obscure term. Either way they appear to be using the term wrongly.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:53 PM
1

I thought DNA evidence proved they didn't have sex.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 08:59 PM
2

Look if you got nothing to post but straw men don't even bother coming here.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:50 AM
2

Who cares if he's "one of us". All that can come out is a guilt by association fallacy.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:45 AM
1

The innocence project might be able to help.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:44 AM
1

In the U.S. no it's not. We do not have a draft so people will respect the military.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 03:43 AM
1

"Even if they only had to go through bootcamp and that was it they would have much greater deal of respect for their armed forces and the realities they face on the battlefield." Ok so we've degraded into "we need to force them to work for us so they'll respect us". That's not going to harbor resentment at all.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 01:19 AM
1

Because men are some hivemind who all share one opinion. Not only that us men can use the psychic powers of our Y chromosome to influence the actions of other men. We all just choose not to.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 01:13 AM
8

So let me get this straight. The man was having sex with an inanimate object in his own room and that's a crime? Forget gender politics for a second, what kind of stupid bullshit is that?
/r/MensRights09/10/11 02:55 AM
7

Male firefighters should not be paid more than female ones. That would mean that a woman who can pull the same weight as a man gets paid less because they give her advantages she doesn't use. What should happen is that both men and women have to meet the same physical standards and there should be no quotas.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 02:51 AM
9

Someone on reddit posts a childish insult? What a shocker. Next you're going to tell me they do that on youtube. Please don't make this shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 02:45 AM
1

Oh ok then, I had it pictured wrong. Sorry.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 06:04 AM
1

Well if your idea is to discriminate against whites and/or men it will look like racism and/or sexism with no excuse for it. We can debate bias all night, and I lean towards there being some bias, but it doesn't matter because I think that discrimination is not an ethical way to deal with it.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 06:03 AM
2

Not consciously. Well maybe some of them do it conciously, but that's something we should fight. Not a policy we should copy.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 02:45 AM
1

I was picturing a long line of people and all the white guys near the front had to give up their spot for being white guys. Was that not how it worked?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 02:44 AM
5

Why is it so hard for feminists to get this? They try to justify discrimination with "oh well they're privileged so it doesn't matter", or something along those lines.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 02:00 AM
3

So? There are lots of other white men who hate them and what they do.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 01:58 AM
4

You're right there doesn't need to be punishment involved, but this example is punishment (or close enough). Oh and normally I'd write a post about how the ends don't justify evil means but I'm tired of saying that over and over (not to you but to the many people I've debated this with online), so yeah.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 01:56 AM
3

No it's a shitty analogy because to "correct" the board, you'd be punishing the people who never tilted it in the first place rather than the same player.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 10:15 PM
0

Because the right wing has leaned to hide their sexism and racism. (and no I'm not one those people who think all of Obama's critics are motivated by race).
/r/MensRights07/10/11 09:53 PM
4

Tilted boards are immoral and should not be used. You cannot justify it with "well it'll help out this group".
/r/MensRights07/10/11 09:52 PM
1

Not much you can do about her house being a mess unless it's literally too messy to live in. Not too much of a big deal though IMO.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 01:18 AM
1

I thought that was Hilary Clinton.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 05:58 AM
2

"Rape involves penetration of vag with a wiener." So anal sex against someone's will is not rape?
/r/MensRights02/10/11 09:52 PM
3

...I suppose women were the victims of the draft being men only.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 09:51 PM
-1

Seriously? There are so many radio hits about violence in general that nobody minds (except for uptight conservative killjoys). Maxwell Silver hammer is all about a guy who beats innocent people to death (and at least one of them was a woman). No one minds.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 02:10 AM
0

"There's no shortage of misogynistic composers" That's not what he asked.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 01:44 AM
3

"She says the cop had been reprimanded 16 times in the previous 4 years, suspended without pay 5 times, and "recommended for termination for insubordination," but the school kept him on the force "without remedial training."" It's fucking amazing that he was kept on the force even though he keeps getting into trouble and has no training. I mean really it's god damn mind blowing. Anyway I hate to say it but this isn't a mens' rights issue. We can't know if sex played into his decision to shoot wi…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:24 AM
2

Uh what's wrong with the second picture? Am I missing something? "The scary truth about rape on campus". Yeah it's a cheap fear mongering hook but I don't see anything in it that would concern men's rights or feminists.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 06:35 AM
1

Is this Poe's Law or are you serious about this?
/r/MensRights11/09/11 02:31 AM
5

No. The mom was the actual rapist. Yeah the boyfriend did something criminal but watching a rape is not on the same level as actually raping someone.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 01:23 AM
1

Um, I followed the links and don't see her saying that. You shouldn't just link to the front page of the blog. That's probably changed between then and now.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 01:15 AM
2

They don't even have to lie for the accused to be innocent. Sometimes innocent people get mistaken for actual criminals. The innocence project has lots of documentation proving this. So even if you believe the stupid idea that women never lie about rape you should still be in favor of fair trials for the accused (and the whole innocent until proven guilty thing).
/r/MensRights08/09/11 10:31 PM
1

Nice story thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 11:59 PM
1

Monogamy is natural it's just not common in nature. Out of all the animal species only a tiny amount of them practice monogamy but a few do.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 11:57 PM
1

I highly doubt all women buy into that petty war of the sexes crap.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 08:24 AM
1

I just said I hate television censorship. The day I side with the PTC on that is the day the Sahara freezes over. Besides they mostly just complain about shows dealing with sex. Although they have a website so since they're aware of the internet it baffles me that those shows with no nudity concern them that much.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 08:23 AM
1

I don't think it's fair to censor something just because you don't have enough people voicing the opposite opinion. I mean we did get enough people complaining that they apologized on their own. They know there's a line now.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 12:02 AM
2

Don't start with that shit. If you think a cause is worth supporting you should support it even if some people won't return the favor. And besides I guarantee that some women would use your refusal to support female causes as an excuse to not support male causes, and we keep going in circles.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 03:13 AM
2

It's one thing to complain to CBS but don't try to get the FCC to censor them. I'm sorry but I just hate the fact that our government censors TV and I'd definitely put Sharon Osbourne's commentary under free speech.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 03:07 AM
11

I know you're joking but dude that's not cool. Yeah she said something repulsive but she doesn't deserve to get hurt because of it.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 03:05 AM
7

"And why there’s no such thing as being ‘racist’ towards white people" I know this isn't related to gender but this bullshit pisses me off. If you believe all white people can't dance that's racism same as if you believe all black people love watermelon. Even if you we go by the bullshit "prejudice + power" there are black people with power over whites.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 12:40 AM
1

The person who wrote this really didn't think this thing through. If you think about it it's basically saying that single mothers cannot raise their children adequately. Although it is possible they believe such nonsense (there certainly are some conservatives who think so).
/r/MensRights29/08/11 12:27 AM
1

You got it backwards, you don't assume the law reflects morality. You figure out what is ethical or not on your own and then you try to have the law reflect that.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 04:11 PM
0

"Which would leave the woman completely on her own" She could choose to give the child up for adoption.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 08:15 AM
1

If your dad doesn't have serious mental issues something had had to go seriously wrong for him to be declared legally insane. It's no cake walk though.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 08:13 AM
0

Ohhh you. Posting stuff that adds nothing to the discussion.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 08:11 AM
1

If you're looking for law to define morality than you are looking in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 08:10 AM
1

Steps must be taken to make sure the mother can't stop the father from adding his name if we were to do that.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 07:49 AM
2

Because men care a lot less about life than a woman? It sounds pretty sexist.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 07:46 AM
3

Does he have evidence of them being pedophiles or not? It sounds like he's just being a paranoid moron.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 03:16 AM
1

I never trust people on the right to tell me what the left believes or vice versa. So often it's full of straw men and missing the point, like the "War on Christmas".
/r/MensRights26/08/11 03:12 AM
3

Keep all the texts, the might come in handy.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 03:07 AM
1

"If she wants to rub her vagina, so as to get a lot of ejaculate on her hands, and then rub 50 other vaginae impregnating all of the women they belong to... Well that's her choice." And since she used her property to impregnate other women it should be her responsibility to look after those children right? "Doesn't matter how they were conceived" Guess not. Here I thought you had a brain. Even if we accept that you're giving her the semen it'd be akin to giving someone a car (that has a license)…
/r/MensRights26/08/11 01:49 AM
2

Abortion is a woman's issue so the opinions here will vary. I've got no problem with it even if the father wants the kid. However since the mother has a way to opt out of supporting a pregnancy so too should the father (financially), and since not all women like abortions they should be given the same option in case the father wants to raise it.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 01:42 AM
0

That will just lead to parents pretending to abusive and incompetent to avoid paying child support.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 01:36 AM
1

I am glad that so many people are ripping salon apart in the comments.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:27 PM
1

I have 2 books on my summer reading list. One of them is by a woman the other is not. Since neither book is discussing gender or sex or anything like that I don't care about the sex of the authors and neither should anyone else. The books are *Get Capone by Jonathan Eig *Reality is broken [it's a book about how video games can improve society] by Jane McGonigal
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:25 PM
1

I've skimmed one of her books, found a conspiracy involving Obama as if he could sick the media on people (this was before he was president). Haven't looked back since.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:19 PM
1

Not the absurdity of equality but the absurdity of quotas.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:17 PM
1

Complaining about Obama's summer reading list is probably the most trivial useless thing anyone could be discussing. It's a non-issue.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:13 PM
1

There's groupthink in every population. To pretend this problem is unique to the Left or the Right is pure self-serving bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:12 PM
1

Ok got it working, let's see they mentioned castration but they don't advocate that more men get castrated or anything like that. I don't have a problem with this. As for the other one well it's a little creepy to have a sniper fact in there thrown in at random (it'd be better if it was "this month's random gun fact" or something) but other than that I also have no problems. Hell I'd subscribe to that.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 06:30 PM
1

Don't encourage that kind of petty bullshit. Normally I'd say yes but this thing is just so damn shallow.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:31 PM
0

Both are legal, this is one site not allowing it on their site.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:29 PM
1

IMO when you're in public you don't get to expect privacy. I think people should be allowed to photograph whoever they want that's just walking around in public. I still think the site is disgusting just not criminal.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:28 PM
1

PDf files aren't working for me right now for some reason. can you quote them please?
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:25 PM
1

thanks for the post very helpful.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:46 AM
30

"Site encourages women to take pictures of men on London underground without their knowledge, then upload them so their appearance and clothes can be rated and bitched on". Wow. I believe I have just found the least classy website ever! Worse than 4chan. (and yes I'd be saying the same thing if the genders were reversed or both were included).
/r/MensRights25/08/11 08:31 AM
1

"and we can be sure, it being a feminist rag, that it wasn't at all male freindly, in fact it was most likely very hostile" No we can't. I wouldn't be surprised if it was, but it's possible for people to discuss castration while being male friendly.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 08:27 AM
2

"Quick I need a simple explanation for why these people are pissed. Let's make something up." So should you be allowed to give your child a tatoo? Same logic applies. I'll quote Cracked "It's medically comparable to removing a male baby's nipples at birth -- sure, they're useless, but all things considered, why add expense and/or risk if you don't have to?" Ok so men can get themselves cut later if they want.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:23 AM
2

Because some people in our society still have a very prudish outlook on sex. A lot of those same people will also call a woman a pervert for masturbating so it's not entirely against men.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:29 AM
-1

'Because I expect her to have the integrity to stick by her yes, even if she isn't happy with where it led her? " People can change their mind at the last second, it's not a kiddy thing to do. If you are checking things out a grocery store you're allowed to take something out of the cart say "I don't want this", leave it at the counter and not pay for it. (I chose this not because I thought it's comparable to sex but because it's the most mundane thing I can think of, that's less important than …
/r/MensRights19/08/11 06:48 AM
0

"If you do not have the sexual confidence and maturity to utter the word "stop" when you are lying naked in a man's bed after choosing to climb into it, then you had absolutely NO business climbing into it in the first place." I really disagree. People can say stop at any time. And what if one of them started trying a position or a fetish the other didn't want?
/r/MensRights19/08/11 06:44 AM
6

"Men should always assume "no" unless given an explicit verbal "yes."" I have no problem with this one assuming they apply it to women too. "An account was given of a woman who was "afraid" to say no, so she just said yes and had sex with him. This was considered a rape." If you try to prosecute that as rape you'd be (rightfully) laughed at. What the fuck happened to the "yes means yes" campaign?
/r/MensRights19/08/11 06:40 AM
2

Rape is sexual intercourse when one person didn't consent. Using sperm in that way is NOT sexual intercourse. Yeah it's bad and horrible but it's not rape.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:41 PM
2

It's not rape. She didn't have intercourse with him without his consent, so it's not rape. Fertilization is not and never will be the same as sex. Following that logic if a man gives to a sperm bank you could say he had sex with whichever woman gets his eventual sperm, even if they never meet.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:17 AM
3

When the fuck did Yoko Ono become a feminist leader?
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:03 AM
7

Being biological parents doesn't mean they are good parents. I mean look at all the abusive people out there that have kids.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:01 AM
1

They have a name for that, it's called Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 04:53 AM
3

"men sometimes cannot properly understand what is and isn't misogynistic simply because we aren't women and don't have the correct frame of reference" You say later that it is possible for men to understand misogyny so if there are men who don't understand misogyny it isn't because they're men.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 05:54 PM
9

You know other people put effort into their misogyny, this is just sad.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:03 AM
5

Oh no you got it all wrong feminists listen to men who "recognize their privilege" in other words they listen to men who all ready agree with them.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:02 AM
6

"and someone is offended by a remark they perceive to be misogynistic you can't automatically assume that proof is required for that comment to be seen as misogynistic. " No but we demand reasoning and we should not take their word for it. Sometimes people will get offended by the most insane stupid shit. Take Resident Evil 5, some people were offended that a white character (who has been in previous games) was shooting black zombies in Africa and called it racist (keep in mind this was based of…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:00 AM
1

"f they were actually in flagrante delicto" What? No one can get into that position.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 07:28 PM
2

"The fact that men are stronger than women," That's not fucking relevant. There are lots of way to subdue someone stronger than you. And hey this woman could've been stronger than him. "and that the woman he was allegedly raped by someone she was in a relationship with" Most rapes are not by strangers but by people the victim knows. So it's still not relevant. Fuck you sound like the pigs who say that when a man rapes his wife it's not really rape.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 07:27 PM
1

Is it really straw men or is it missing the point? Bah whatever. I look at this way. Anyone who wants to fight for the rights of women (and only women) will call themselves a feminist. Anyone who wants to fight for the rights of men (and only men) will call themselves a MRA.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 07:24 PM
2

Something else from the Department of Labor that suggest the gender wage gap isn't due to discrimination http://www.the-spearhead.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Gender-Wage-Gap-Final-Report.pdf One sentence I found interesting. "Research indicates that women may value non-wage benefits more than men do, and as a result prefer to take a greater portion of their compensation in the form of health insurance and other fringe benefits"
/r/MensRights11/08/11 10:18 PM
2

Also if you keep hearing about them it could warp your view on how common they are. It's like how people think child abductions are common because the media LOVES to do stories about them but they are really incredibly rare.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 12:38 AM
1

There will always be injustice in the world probably enough to fill up several reddits. That doesn't mean you shouldn't fight it, far from it. It's just that you shouldn't become enraged that the world isn't perfect.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 10:13 PM
2

This is why I used to not go to Tvtropes, I'd be tempted to go to the Troper Tales section of "Abuse is OK when it's female on male" (the place where people talk about experiencing that trope IRL). It'd make for a lot of rage. They don't have that Troper Tales anymore and I don't know why.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:32 PM
1

I don't mind certain stories being buried by the media, I'm quite sick of them talking about crimes that happened in other states that have 0 effect on me (unless they're a terrorist attack or something like that).
/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:30 PM
1

I wasn't trying to be rude
/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:27 PM
16

I'd like to meet the people who thought this didn't go too far. Wait I take that back I want them to stay away from me.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:10 AM
-4

American news shows sometimes report about stuff that happens oversee. All you need to do is google the town it took place in (they mention it in the video) to find out it's in Florida.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:09 AM
3

They might've gotten away with it but we don't know for sure. Guessing doesn't help.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 06:57 AM
1

She used Vasectomy rates for comparison? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't reversing a vasectomy not a 100% certainty? If it were the case that you might not be able to reverse it I'm sure responsible doctors would tell men that and that would lead to a decrease in use.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 05:08 AM
4

They did just that and held him down.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 05:04 AM
15

I'm not going to condemn the show until I actually see how they handle it. And they wouldn't be the first to trivialize murder (not just murder against men but murder in general) for the sake of comedy.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 09:00 AM
1

Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 05:35 PM
1

Any written agreement between consenting adults. I do think it should be legal to sell your kidneys.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:58 AM
1

You know it's not even illegal to take pictures of kids playing the in park. Even when said kids aren't related to you.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:58 PM
1

How do you get from "parents do not get to raise their children any way they choose" to "parents shouldn't get to raise their kids at all and it should be left to the state"?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:52 PM
1

If you can get in writing than sure, I guess.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:19 PM
3

I've never been a fan of "the ends justify evil means". It's the same bullshit that people use to justify racist shit like affirmative action because well hot damn we need it if blacks are ever to be equal to whites in terms of money/economic class. To hand out injustices to women is wrong and saying "well it's OK I'm doing this to create a better society" doesn't make them less of an injustice. And I fail to see why it would be absolutely necessary.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:55 AM
1

"if anything, establishing the sole prosecution eyewitness's credibility should be seen as MORE important in a rape case than in many other cases." Interesting point. Although I think things like "oh she was the town slut" should not be dragged out in court as they are completely irrelevant to whether or not she was raped.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:46 AM
3

This article has the least substance of any article I've ever read. What point was she trying to make? That rape accusers should always be believed? No one is denying that guilty people sometimes walk free, but our justice system should be designed around minimizing the innocents that get convicted even if it means letting some guilty people go free.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:41 AM
1

...You really think that's comparable to circumcision? And I'm just going by the dictionary, not whatever definition you're using.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:24 AM
4

Yeah I know, but I don't blame all women or even all feminists for this fuck up of the justice system.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 09:02 PM
9

These talks of getting revenge on women do nothing but make us look bad, like really bad. Also you can't justify bad laws and injustice with "well they've benefited from other injustice".
/r/MensRights28/07/11 08:15 PM
5

Only the most clueless idiots would call asking a woman to use birth control sexist. Don't worry about that.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 08:14 PM
6

"Is a man's life ruined if he is circumcised?" That's the standard? Well a baby's life isn't ruined if we give them tattoos, so let's legalize that.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:43 PM
2

Some religions practice female circumcision so if male circumcision is to be protected female circumcision must be too.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:41 PM
2

No dumbass. You're permanently cutting off a part of the body that won't grow back. Mutilation. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/mutilation
/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:41 PM
1

No dumbass. You're permanently cutting off a part of the body that won't grow back. Mutilation. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/mutilation
/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:41 PM
3

Freedom of religion is not a pass to do whatever the hell you want.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:39 PM
3

It does get usurped by the state. Parents do not get to raise their child however they want. If they are abusive or neglectful the state can take their children away.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:36 PM
6

Because women are responsible for the lack of a male birth control pill? If you're THAT worried you can refuse to have sex with anyone unless you get to wear a condom.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:35 PM
3

I didn't read the article, but trying to dissect everything a mass murderer believed or did seems pretty standard fare for the media in general. At the end of the day it can really only be used for a cheap, easily countered guilt by association.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:51 AM
1

Yes and I feel bad for the people who are forced into being sex slaves. BUT some prostitutes are there by choice, not all of them have pimps or drug problems and to me the idea that these prostitutes-by-choice are hurt by their johns is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:40 AM
1

Yes and I feel bad for the people who are forced into being sex slaves. BUT some prostitutes are there by choice, not all of them have pimps or drug problems and to me the idea that these prostitutes-by-choice are hurt by their johns is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:40 AM
1

Yes and I feel bad for the people who are forced into being sex slaves. BUT some prostitutes are there by choice, not all of them have pimps or drug problems and to me the idea that these prostitutes-by-choice are hurt by their johns is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:40 AM
2

Yes and I feel bad for the people who are forced into being sex slaves. BUT some prostitutes are there by choice, not all of them have pimps or drug problems and to me the idea that these prostitutes-by-choice are hurt by their johns is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:38 AM
4

Some feminists can't understand why some women would want to be strippers, porn starts or prostitutes for reasons other than money. So they plunge into denial and make up stories about how they really didn't choose that life and it's just evil people taking advantage of them.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:34 AM
3

My response Some women choose to sell sex to men. So if that's the case why should it matter. Some women choose to do work that other people think is degrading. Some women choose to do work other people find dehumanizing and objectifying. Why don't you mind your own business?
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:31 AM
2

What's your source for that one, I think someone posted it before but I can't find it.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 12:22 AM
3

Criticizing someone's use of swear words is utterly and completely pointless. People can make good arguments whilest swearing and some people just grew up around people who swear a lot and for them it's not a big deal.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 12:20 AM
3

They should put that comment in the faq or link it on the side.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 11:19 PM
1

This is news to me.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 11:11 PM
2

"much younger but legal aged women is frowned upon." If they are legal age then they are not jailbait. Just thought I'd clarify jailbait only refers to people under the age of consent (though usually not by much).
/r/MensRights16/07/11 02:48 AM
0

Now you're just being silly. http://www.motivationalmine.com/wp-content/uploads/tdomf/13181/picture%20unrelated.jpg
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:06 PM
0

"Why is this such a bad thing?" It's forced labor. "Many countries require mandatory military service" This doesn't make it OK. "would you really be so cowardly and shirk your duties?" I am under no obligation to serve my government. "you should find some place else to live." Oh definitely. I'd rather be a Canadian citizen than an American slave.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:42 PM
0

I only speak for myself when I say that (hence IMO). The morality of having a draft is not a men's rights issue, (but making it men only is). Although if you'd actually like to argue why the draft is OK instead of hurling insults I'm all ears.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:36 PM
5

Allow me to quote a fictional man who was based on an actual woman. "A man chooses. A slave obeys." If a government has taken away your right to say no. If they have forced you to work against your will for a cause you may not support what have they made you? Some people think men have all the 'privilege' but we're still the ones that can be enslaved by our government should they run out of manpower.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:51 AM
6

We are under no moral obligation to serve our country. The government is supposed to work for us not the other way around. Oh and we definitely should not tolerate sexism in our government.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:43 AM
4

Can you be consistent? Either there's never going to be a draft so this is just an unnecessary burden men have to put up with. OR There may be a draft again and the fact that it only conscripts men and not women is a huge injustice. Hell IMO the idea of a draft is a huge injustice
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:42 AM
4

You really think forced labor is justifiable with "well you'll be less ignorant"? Ok I'm going to force you to pick my crops, hey you'll be less ignorant of how farming works.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:23 AM
1

10th amendment? What's that, I've never heard of that before.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:40 PM
1

Casually throwing around accusations of misogyny isn't misandry in the least (it's a stupid dismissal tactic but unless they apply it to every man ..). This is just diluting the term misandry which is ironic.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 08:21 AM
0

Wishing more men would get castrated is creepy but it's just an opinion. IMO it's not much of an issue until they try to force men or boys to get one.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 08:32 AM
2

I didn't watch the video but unless they are doing this to children who don't need it I fail to see why this is a men's rights issue. If adults want to get unusual body modifications that should be their right.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:40 AM
1

Well it's not in facts at a glance and the longer document crashed my reader.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:35 AM
1

In case anyone wants a more reliable source (like I did). Here's ABC news making the same claim. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/mothers-psychologically-abuse-children-bad-sex-abusers-experts/story?id=10577646 Still trying to find something directly from the CDC.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:25 AM
1

He says that he keeps going back to high school to catch up with what's happening in the world (guess he doesn't get CNN). But yeah the stalking is pretty creepy.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 06:35 PM
2

No he is not. A pedophile is someone sexually attracted to people who haven't gone through puberty. Most high schoolers do not qualify. (Not trying to defend Twilight, just saying).
/r/MensRights09/07/11 10:57 PM
1

I have never seen truer words on reddit than this.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 10:56 PM
-6

No we're just not buying his matriarchy conspiracy.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 10:38 PM
-4

You refer to women as bitches and act like you aren't a misogynist? Give it up dude. You over estimate how much power they have. You expect women and men to fall into gender roles and you basically say "men have earned this thing that women are taking away." You haven't earned anything by virtue of your gender, that's just moronic. "Not only do women still posses the power to choose their mate based on their personal desires for protection and support," I'm sorry but this is really stupid. In th…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 10:38 PM
1

It's not really "mothers should never be punished" it's "nobody should ever be punished". Either way it's incredibly stupid. "It is widely and wrongly interpreted in the community to mean that costs will be awarded against the party if they cannot prove the act complained of actually occurred." Then amend it so that it specifically tells people not to do that. Letting people off the hook when they deliberately lie about abuse is an injustice
/r/MensRights09/07/11 10:32 PM
9

"Seriously you seem to be implying a man doesn't have rights. Like the right not to get raped." Uh No. I'm guessing his thought process is "she didn't get off easy for being a female so how's this a gender issue?"
/r/MensRights09/07/11 09:32 AM
2

"It's a response to people who think women have it worse." Some people do and at the same time also think circumcision is bad enough to be outlawed. Does it really matter?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 09:21 AM
6

So if they're gay it's OK for them to get raped by other men? Or is it that gay men would want sex with any other man at any time? Both are laughably wrong.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:15 AM
2

where in the report is it?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:14 AM
2

My guess is they're used to hearing babies cry, and especially cutting skin and seeing blood.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:07 PM
1

I suddenly want to know what the heck pterodactyl porn is.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:06 PM
12

It's irrelevant who has it worse, the fact is this is bad and should be stopped (and videos can be good at showing how bad it is). Fighting over who has it worse is pointless and just divides us.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:04 PM
2

Ugh no thanks, I cringed when I watched the 10 seconds clips Penn and Teller showed in their circumcision episode.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:03 PM
0

That image doesn't prove gender bias it just proves the person is sexually attracted to women but not men. If that's gender bias then fine, but it's still not something to be concerned about.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:00 PM
1

It is childish. Can't we just end this? I mean seriously he disagrees with women over gender issues so we should boycott his books that have shit to do with gender issues. The woman in the elevator incident didn't call it a near sexual assault (at least at first) so can we please just ignore this thing now since we're all going to stop caring in a week anyway?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 10:56 PM
2

Do you have a source for that claim? It would prove very useful.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 10:43 PM
1

Just thought I should mention I'm not in favor of scolding rape victims. Car crash victims are another story because sometimes it IS their fault.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 03:48 AM
3

The equivalent would be to carry something for self defense just in case. Although if you scold a rape victim for not carrying mace/a gun you're evil but if you scold a car crash victim for not having a seat belt on you're fine.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:33 PM
3

So every time you have consensual sex with your boss you really didn't want it you were just pressured into doing it and you didn't even know it? Wow, I've never read a more condescending pile of bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:28 PM
-4

"Why go to a social outing if you aren't going to be social?" This was 4 AM. Most people (who aren't insomniacs) don't want to chat at that hour) "And what the hell do you think people DO at bars." This wasn't a bar.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:05 AM
-1

"and if you ask for sex your a rapist." Can you stop with the straw men? Only the most radical idiot fringe feminists would ever believe that. If you tried that in court you'd be laughed at.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:58 AM
5

These woman really expect the skeptic community to respect their irrational fear of men (when many of them are men)? How is that not an unreasonable request.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:24 AM
6

"had no idea whether she was attractive or not til i read these comments." Wouldn't it be better to just look at her and judge for yourself. I don't think she's unattractive. Her being unattractive is not evidence she's blowing this out of proportion for kicks. It really is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:57 PM
5

According to them whenever women meet men they have to be worried that they are rapists. I'm not sure if this is misandry or paranoia or both.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 10:43 PM
8

1 is irrelevant, and not even unclassy. her attractiveness doesn't matter. 3 is dead on.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 10:08 PM
1

To the OP. This isn't the best place to find professional advice (neither is /feminism), so take everything you hear here with some salt.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 10:01 PM
2

"Men's rights loves to vilify women through anecdotal evidence and first hand accounts to somehow imply that this is respective of all women's actions and thoughts." I'm not sure if this is a straw man or if you're actually stupid enough to believe this is what he's saying. "I believe it is male instinct to be drawn towards rape" And you've got nothing to back that up. "it is therefore laughable to suggest that women are capable of committing the same offence at a similar animosity." So because …
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:51 PM
1

I feel sorry for you man. I really do. Thanks for sharing and I hope you get better. Maybe you should press charges if you think they'll stick.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:32 PM
4

The law says that if a man board member leaves they HAVE to be replaced by a woman if they have <30%. Even if there are more qualified males around. If you don't see this as sexism then you're just deluding yourself.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 05:33 AM
1

Yeah I know, sorry.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:51 PM
2

"the passage of time has eradicated the male's ability to fairly defend himself". I think people can still get a fair trial regardless. If they had other evidence besides the testimony don't you think that might warrant a trial?
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:51 PM
1

If you have evidence that someone committed a crime a long time ago then yeah you should be able to have a trial. I think you can have a fair trial and take into account that the defendant legitimately doesn't remember what happened. Not that I think they have enough evidence to convict this guy (based on what I've seen so far).
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:04 AM
3

It's funny when someone acts like they're intelligent while making typos.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:26 AM
-2

Ok fine, why do they assume the sisters are lying. I mean if they find the guy innocent due to lack of evidence that's not proof they knowingly lied about it.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:20 AM
0

"So why do we let 16 year olds drive cars if they are considered a child in sexual matters." The age of consent IS 16 in some states.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:29 AM
3

There is nothing inherently wrong with trying someone for something that happened dozens of years ago. It's happened with murder plenty of times. A local police woman here was convicted of a murder she committed decades ago. Plenty of Catholic priests have been convicted of raping boys a long time ago. So yeah him getting a trial is not an atrocity. Why does this article assume he's innocent anyway?
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:22 AM
1

This reminds me of the argument that "if we still had a draft politicians and the public might care more about wars knowing they or their children might be forced to join them. This will lead to less war." While that might be true I'm not a big a fan of "the ends justify evil means".
/r/MensRights23/06/11 10:38 PM
7

"You seem to think that the First emendment means that you can say anything you like without any bad consequense" It means the GOVERNMENT cannot punish you for your speech. A judge taking away your kids for a perfectly legal website you made IS a violation of free speech.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 10:34 PM
2

I wonder if this violates cruel and unusual punishment. Punishing you for something you literally have no control over.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 10:33 PM
1

How are they being taken advantage of? No one forced them to do this, and being raped does not make them children. It does not mean they are no longer (mentally) healthy enough to consent
/r/MensRights23/06/11 10:22 PM
1

The women with sexual abuse still choose to do it. Would you rather they discriminate against victims of abuse? Being sexually abused does not make you incapable of making decisions for yourself.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 07:42 PM
1

I didn't say true feminists, I said most feminists. The idea that adult porn leads to child porn is beyond idiotic.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 07:39 PM
3

You can just as easily have sex with her then say "hey if we filmed this we would've just made porn and contributed to the rape culture"
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:36 PM
2

Abuse of her first amendment rights? That's kind of a stretch. Maybe she is dumb enough to believe everything she's saying.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:35 PM
1

Around 2008 I believe.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:33 PM
3

No. This isn't common feminist thinking. This is the kind of totally illogical thinking that even some of the radicals laugh at.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:32 PM
0

Sometimes only the crazy people will agree to be on Bullshit and they do not edit them out of context
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:29 PM
3

Underage drawings can land you in jail if they are found obscene, and given how loose the definition of obscenity is it probably applies to all of them. And yes people have been charged for owning underage drawings.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:26 PM
3

Not really. The government sometimes prosecutes pornographers under a very vague obscenity law. Also there are feminists who want porn to be legal. They call themselves pro-sex feminists. The name kind of implies that feminists that want to ban porn are anti-sex which is why I think it's the best name ever.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:25 PM
24

Father's Day is just to celebrate your Dad, it's not a day for activism and neither is Mother's Day.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 09:20 PM
1

She never said she wanted all men circumcised she said she prefers circumcised men. Some men get circumcised as adults you know.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 09:32 PM
1

Firefox's dictionary is just weird. Stoner is not recognized by them for instance.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 09:31 PM
2

and slavery.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 03:18 AM
-1

It's personal taste on what kind of dick shape she likes. Calm down. Some men prefer small breasts and no one complains that he wants to give all women breast reductions.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 03:17 AM
1

"Is it wrong for me to be worried that a younger female friend who is going through a rebellious period with alcohol could be taken advantage of?" No, there are evil men who will do that. Assuming that all men are like that is sexist.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 02:47 AM
8

Construction workers don't design the buildings though.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 02:38 AM
17

"Why is there always a queue for the ladies? " Because urinals take up less space than stalls. Any other brilliant questions?
/r/MensRights18/06/11 02:38 AM
1

Right because individuals never lie or accidentally finger the wrong person. Nope never happened in the history of criminal justice.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 02:12 AM
3

"However, when you submit to a man's demands to make you a sandwich whilst he sits and watches TV, that is caving to sexism." Not if you tell him that he has to return the favor. You know what not even that. My friends and I do favors for each other without asking or keeping count of if we owe each other favors. It's just kind of what we do.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 03:11 AM
14

Can we stop with all these letter that purport to blame all women for ... anything? Seriously that kind of stuff should be shrugged off as the over-reactions they are.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 03:04 AM
3

Here's my reply letter I doubt the psycho will publish it because she'd rather stroke herself than listen to reason. Dear EVE Daughter's Go away. This is about you personally. You don't know shit about statistics or how to measure the reactions of half the population and you are stupid enough to think you can make blanket statements about billions of people based on a relatively tiny number of cases. You're an idiot. You're hypocritical enough to complain that men are trying to make women worth …
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:59 AM
6

You should also do transsexuals who were born as women. Watching them call them traitors in some imaginary gender war will be funny.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:58 AM
1

Holy cow am I sick of this rape culture BS. Yeah we're in a culture that supports rape despite it being taboo to have rape in movies (lifetime ones aside) or games or whatever. We're still a culture that convicts rapists and put them up on a big list of sex offenders (yes I know that list was made for pedos but we still do it). We don't do either of those things with murderers (although we do give the heinous ones the death penalty).
/r/MensRights15/05/11 06:09 AM
1

Men's clubs vs. women's organizations? I hope you're comparing strip clubs to strip clubs because it doesn't sound like it. Anyway who besides feminists and conservative shmucks who are just looking for any excuse to ban porn take those arguments against strip clubs seriously?
/r/MensRights28/04/11 06:41 AM
3

This is disturbing but I'm not sure what this has to do with mens' rights (or gender for that matter). You sure you got the right subreddit?
/r/MensRights03/03/11 10:33 PM
2

Thirteen is a bad argument. The crazies always get talked about more on every issue. And like every other issue there's not a whole lot the non-fringes can do about it. Take the WBC. Most Christians, hell most U.S. citizens think they are absolute low scum, and yet what can the average Christian do about them? Not much, they still get talked about all the time they do something super controversial (which is often).
/r/MensRights03/03/11 10:19 PM
2

One thing I'm sick of is the mainstream news covering every single fucking bizarre crime that happens. So if they stopped covering all crimes like this I'd be happy (better to be online so people who want to ignore it can).
/r/MensRights03/03/11 05:41 AM
7

Who cares? It should be legalized regardless because it's consensual adults and it's their bodies (and when I say legalized I don't mean that stupid Swedish model that arrests johns but not prostitutes).
/r/MensRights03/03/11 05:18 AM
1

I am not reading the entire 176 page law. Tell me what sections make it controversial in your eyes. Also why wouldn't lesbian abuse count as violence against women?
/r/MensRights02/07/10 08:33 AM
1

Not really. Lesbians batter each other at the same rate as straight couples. It's something they like to bring up whenever someone says lesbians are evil or can't handle marriage or some other stupid claim.
/r/MensRights02/07/10 02:45 AM
1

What luxury? A man could counter-sue as well. No one here has a crystal ball and we can't know the result of the suit.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 08:32 PM
0

Fuck No. You can't deny people a right to vote because you don't like how they vote. That's called tyranny.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 08:29 PM
1

Those can exist for ANY charge.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 06:11 PM
1

It's not rape it's merely err not holding up your end of the bargain. This would be like refusing to pay for a prostitute afterwords. It should be punished but it isn't rape. And assuming she doesn't get pregnant or an STD from this I'd personally think that this would be too much of a mild crime to bother the police about but that's just me.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 04:48 AM
2

Stop posting this crap, we know extremes exist no need to tell us.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 07:06 PM
5

Not allowed to have educations? There's more women in college then men.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 06:57 PM
-1

(Sorry it wouldn't let me edit) How about "You raped me so I punched you." "No you didn't, it was sex then you assaulted me." Hell that could work even if said victim didn't actually hit their assailant. Guess the next move will be for these "feminists" to make it legal for women to assault men.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 10:30 AM
1

Besides aren't rape cases usually a case of his word vs. her word? Also I betcha I could easily find cases of two parties both claiming that the other breached a contract. Shall we rewrite the law so that only one of them may make a claim of wrongdoing? How about all the other times in court someone counter-sues claiming wrongdoing on the plantiff? How about even "You raped me." "You're lying, you should be charge with libel/slander/I'm suing you in civic court." Also what about if a man gets ra…
/r/MensRights12/03/10 10:25 AM
0

So what? How does that justify not being able to charge women with rape?
/r/MensRights12/03/10 10:13 AM
1

Thanks for the link. Now for the assholes that didn't want this bill to pass "The law treats men and women as being equal when it is obvious that in these matters, the men are the stronger ones." A. Interesting that you now claim equality of sexes under the law is a bad thing. B. Assuming that men will be able to overpower the women in all instances is simply bullshit! What about men who are out of shape? What about disabled men? What about the women who are generally more powerful than your ave…
/r/MensRights12/03/10 10:12 AM
1

Men are not needed to make a family, neither are women and I'm not convinced you even need children for a family. A single parent with children is a family no matter what the gender. As are two people whether they be the same gender or not (or even if there's more than 2 people). If it gets people to expand on their definition of a family then that's great. I'm not sure it needs a token female-less family to balance things out.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 10:04 AM
2

A family can be a mother and two kids, to say that any model whether it be married couple or whatever, is the proper model for a family is simply bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 03:53 AM
2

I can't find any sources that feminist groups opposed the law, although if they did their massive hypocrisy and general scumminess is just sickening.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 03:24 AM
0

Why do we we need these stories, we all know women can and murder people?
/r/MensRights26/08/09 07:09 PM
1

Nope, percentage wise males are murderers at a much higher rate than females (although the same is true for being murder victims) http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/tables/osextab.htm
/r/MensRights26/08/09 07:09 PM
2

Is it a crime or not to knowingly make false accusations of a crime? If it isn't then it should, but the law needs to be written very carefully as there have been more than a few cases where false rape charges were the result of mistaken identity and in those cases the rape victims should not be punished for that.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 07:03 PM
-4

Shh, your not supposed to talk about female privilege that way the feminists can still pretend there's a massive conspiracy keeping them down.
/r/MensRights25/08/09 01:11 AM
0

Oh great now you think you can read minds as to why I picked my username isn't that cute. Now your posts are not logical all you do is assume people have opinions they never expressed and try to lecture them on why they shouldn't have them. That's flaming my friend, not calling you out on your stupid game.
/r/MensRights25/08/09 01:01 AM
1

If you weren't responding perhaps the mother thought the kid was bothering you. Happened to me once, this small girl started talking to me and I couldn't follow what she was saying. I had a look of confusion on my face so the mother called her away told her not to talk to strangers then apologized to me.
/r/MensRights22/08/09 12:06 AM
0

Is it really that hard not to stick your noses into other people's business? I'd sympathize if they told those jokes specifically so they could hear them, but they didn't so it's just unnecessary censorship.
/r/MensRights21/08/09 11:51 PM
1

Didn't Hustler v. Falwell settle the issue of using the civil courts to suppress speech? This was not sexual harassment this was saying 'mean' things behind someone's back.
/r/MensRights21/08/09 11:50 PM
1

Oh you know implying we think the world revolves around us, that we disrespect women most of the crap in your post
/r/MensRights21/08/09 11:37 PM
1

You have no argument all you made were accusations that he's terrified of women and treats them like objects
/r/MensRights21/08/09 11:36 PM
2

Wait a minute so you're saying that people should have a right to control other people's private conversations just because they're at a workplace? I'll never understand the asinine idea that people have a right to not be offended (here's a hint, the constitution gives us the right to say offensive shit).
/r/MensRights21/08/09 06:24 AM
1

I'm not making one with that post, I was mocking your other post.
/r/MensRights21/08/09 02:06 AM
2

Ok I skipped over that part still doesn't excuse you for making baseless accusations (which you're still doing).
/r/MensRights21/08/09 02:05 AM
-1

Remember folks if you disagree with feminism you hate/are intimidated by women or see them as objects. Man it sure is convenient to just give your opponents labels than actually make an argument.
/r/MensRights21/08/09 12:38 AM
1

No but that's the best you got, all you did was post a long string of attacks and the only thing resembling an argument was "she was raped and you weren't so you should shut up".
/r/MensRights21/08/09 12:36 AM
-1

I wonder why I'm being voted down. If you judge people on the actions of other people, people they never met and couldn't have had any influence over, you are an idiot, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights20/08/09 11:48 PM
1

Yeah paint people who disagree with you as idiots just so you can feel smug about yourself. How original.
/r/MensRights20/08/09 11:10 PM
-2

Oh my mistake she only mistrusts most men based on the way some (not most) have acted around her. Well that makes her irrational response so much more better. Oh and thanks for the ad hominem crap instead of you know actually trying to present arguments. This certainly can't indicate that you're incapable of debate can it? And there is no logic. "Some men have mistreated and offended me therefore I'm going to mistrust every man I encounter that I don't all ready know" That's called a blanket jud…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 07:22 PM
-6

She says she mistrusts all men because of the actions of a few, so she all ready has a bias. She then wants all men to go out of their way to accommodate her. If I were her I would also be looking out for people who can punch 5 mile holes in her logic.
/r/MensRights20/08/09 05:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter