TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rodmclaughlin Archive

View 3 posts and 41 comments by rodmclaughlin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

If you can't understand my comparison of Bindel's harmless verbal attacks on men, with her efforts to help abused children, you're a pathetic excuse for a man. Feminism will never be defeated by "Men's Rights Activists". The very name is wimpy, whiny and laughable.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:49 AM
0

This kind of comment is why I am not a "Men's Rights Activist". Men don't need rights now like women did fifty years ago. The position of the sexes has not been reversed. Julie Bindel can't put anyone in a concentration camp, even if she wanted to, which I doubt. However, she did expose the Muslim child prostitution gangs of England, seven years before the authorities caught up: http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/article72310.ece. Her efforts to save children, against the current o…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:52 AM
5

Julie Bindel is almost unique, in being one of the few feminists in the UK not to give Islamic misogyny a pass. She was the first to expose the Muslim child-rape gangs. But she still makes typical feminist mistakes. In this article, she claims Even men’s rights activists tend to shy away from publicly justifying beating up women because they refuse to obey, even if they secretly condone such actions. Indeed, the only group that still publicly and shamelessly defends wife-beating is the Islamists…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:40 PM
1

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/10/met-police-may-end-policy-of-believing-sexual-abuse-victims-says-hogan-howe Met police may end policy of automatic belief of sex abuse complaints This is a remarkable headline for the Guardian. It gives the lie to the feminist narrative that women aren't believed. It also means that, in certain types of crime, the presumption of the innocence of the accused doesn't currently apply. EDIT: Having actually read the, duh, article, it gives good evidence…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:34 AM
1

Eric Raymond isn't anonymous, and he says his source isn't anonymous either. Still, you should 'doubt the veracity' of his claims. But you should also consider that they might be true. Even if they just might be true, it would be worth taking notice of his advice.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:21 AM
1

It's OK that 12-17-year-old Melburnians are being exposed to theories about "patriarchy" and such. It's not OK that they are not being equally exposed to rebuttals of feminism from evolutionary psychology and other sources.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:57 AM
1

Confirming my point - https://archive.is/ZNLUM A great picture from the Daily Telegraph of North Korean women
/r/MensRights31/10/15 09:26 AM
3

"Femmunist" is a better word than "feminazi". Obviously, feminists have little in common with Nazis. They have much more in common with the old-style communists, in their opposition to freedom under the guise of trying to liberate people from oppression.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 08:59 AM
1

Also, look at this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11955355/Working-on-a-womens-desk-3-years-of-online-hate-in-3-minutes.html Is the Daily Telegraph trying to recruit Jessica Valenti?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 08:57 AM
2

Kahing - could you post the link to this article?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:04 PM
2

the story would have been shelved Not necessarily. Perhaps another lying cunt would have found Jackie and made a big deal out of how Rolling Stone refused to believe a victim.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:10 PM
3

And Amanda Marcotte and Jessica Valenti. They are still saying Jackie was raped.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:03 PM
2

It's true that there's not much point in using the term "cultural Marxist" as an insult. But "cultural Marxism", for all its limitations, has become the standard term for describing the attempt to overthrow the good bits of Western civilization by promoting feelings, women and oppressed minorities.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:00 PM
3

Girls raped by gangs of Muslims in the UK for decades? Exactly one feminist says anything about it. A mad black prostitute falsely accuses some white college students of rape? Most of the media, 88 professors, the police, the DA, the feminists, the left, and the president of the university, say "something happened to this young woman". Eight years later, another liar says the same thing at another college. Have the feminists or the media learned any lessons? Nope - feelings trump facts. Oppressi…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:14 AM
2

The Frankfurt School was 20th century, not 18th, and it wasn't German, though its activists lived in Germany, but, at first glance, it seems obscure. So one out of three for DavidByron2. Though apparently obscure, it was influential. Much of American leftism today can be traced to the ideas put forward in Adorno and co's "The Authoritarian Personality", which tried to explain why white gentiles didn't agree with them by subjecting them to psychoanalysis. The Frankfurt School's obscurity is an il…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:05 AM
3

Why do people yell "conspiracy theory" when no-one has said anything about a conspiracy?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:00 AM
3

The concept "cultural Marxism" doesn't depend on people actually calling themselves "cultural Marxists". It's not a precisely accurate term, but it does identify a genuine phenomenon - in a nutshell, the attempt to replace the proletariat as as the revolutionary agent with other oppressed groups by radicals who were disappointed with the proletariat's lack of radicalism.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:59 AM
1

He can use the n-word because he's black. He can use the c-word and the b-word because his freedom of speech and educational opportunities are being impinged upon by people who are both.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:51 AM
-1

he imagines himself being provocative and inspiring thought You don't know what's going on in True's head, Mikeavelli. he's mostly just trolling people Nonsense. You don't have a criterion which distinguishes between "trolling" and "not trolling". the behavior a lot of 19-year-olds display online He's not 19, and whether his "behavior" resembles that of "a lot of" 19-year-olds is irrelevant to the issues he's discussing. Like all the comments criticizing Jeremiah True, this one deliberately conf…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:46 AM
1

This kid is just an attention seeking scumbag. "Just"? So nothing he says has any value at all? His questioning of the widely-quoted statistic that US colleges are as dangerous for women as the Congo has no validity, because you think he's "seeking attention"? You don't even believe that yourself, 'amphetaminesfailure'. I wonder why you are being so hysterical and dishonest in reaction to this well-spoken young defender of reason, Mr True.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:38 AM
1

discredited in the public's eye by his incoherent ramblings and diatribes I think I_Minored_In is saying that Mr True is making a tactical mistake, in "drawing attention" to an argument which I_Minored_In agrees with, while at the same time saying "incoherent ramblings and diatribes", in other words, things which I_Minored_In does not agree with, would tend to discredit the arguments which I_Minored_In does agree with, in the public eye. I'm not sure. I_Minored_In's argument is too incoherent.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 01:49 AM
1

It's a shame that his correct views on rape statistics are now associated with his generally crazy statements and diatribes. This means that if someone says something I_Minored_In agrees with, they shouldn't also say something he or she disagrees with.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:27 AM
0

From Jeremiah's interviews online, and his Facebook page, he seems to be a smart honest student defending the principles of Reed College against soft Stalinism, where feelings trump facts. He argued against the statistic that says American College is as dangerous for women as the Congo. Femmunists ('survivors') felt hurt. He got dropped from class. Support Jeremiah True!
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:20 AM
7

"Rape accounts should not be questioned if there isn't a need to." There are never any circumstances under which a claim of anything at all should not be questioned.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:58 AM
2

OK, got it. Let's agree to use the word 'minor' for a person so legally defined.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 12:23 PM
2

Many of the comments on the various posts are along the lines of "how dumb of the feminist establishment to make a false allegation against one of the world's best lawyers!" Not necessarily. Assuming he's innocent - which I do - and he proves his innocence - along with that of Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell (?!?) - the feminists will see this simply as further proof of their belief-system. Powerful, rich men manage to defeat a poor girl in court, using 'facts'. The discrediting of a plainti…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:49 AM
2

Epstein has been found guilty of pimping at least one young woman to his social circle You need to provide at least a link for that allegation, and define "young woman". There's young, and young.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:44 AM
1

deeply concerned by the content This statement excludes discussion. You can't say "we're deeply concerned" by something while "recognizing the merits of the argument". "Concerned" is from the same dictionary as "unsafe", "offended" and "victim". It's a vocabulary which excludes discussion. It puts feelings before facts.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 07:57 AM
1

radical anti-Israel students tried to get SodaStream products banned from Harvard dining halls, because they were offended by the "micro-aggression" represented by the location of the company's factory beyond Israel’s Green Line No they didn't. They tried to get SodaStream banned because it is located in an area occupied by a state based on racial discrimination. Political correctness is far more useful to Israel than to its critics, and Alan Dershowitz makes the most of it. This doesn't alter t…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 07:12 AM
0

'HashtagRebbit" says "I haven't seen any evidence to show they supported the gang rape of non white girls." - I remember reading about the confrontation between Sikhs and Muslims in the late eighties in the English Midlands. The media presented it as unfortunate communal conflict within the Asian community. I believed this at the time. It turns out it was Sikh men defending Sikh girls against Muslim men, because the authorities wouldn't. Here's an interview about it with Andrew Norfolk and the S…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:50 AM
2

That's exactly the same proportion as US college girls! What a coincidence - a false right-wing statistic equals a false leftist one.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 09:49 AM
0

First of all, "Pakistani" is a red herring. It just happened that the majority of Muslims in the Rotherham area are of Pakistani origin. In other areas, Somalis, Iraqis and Kosovans have been convicted. Secondly, 'white' is a red herring. The first victims of the Muslim child-rape gangs were girls of Sikh Indian origin. Sikhs organized against the gangs, so the Muslims began to prey five times a day on white girls, using anti-racist arguments to deter investigation. Finally, the fact that the po…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 09:47 AM
1

No ideology will ever escape these pitfalls because it's built into our psychology to discard disagreeing information rather than modifying our ideologies. There are exceptions. Scientists in general follow Karl Popper's example, and try to falsify their hypotheses rather than accumulating information which conforms to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 03:16 AM
2

Feminists are part of the left. They don't just ignore inconvenient things, they tell lies about non-existent things - like the Duke story in the US - and ignore actual things involving the oppression of women and girls, which is what they claim to oppose. Like the Muslim rape scandal in the UK.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 02:46 AM
0

Feminists writing in the Guardian about the non-existent threat of campus rape culture didn't cause Muslim men to gang-rape, threaten and prostitute under-age girls up and down the UK for the last quarter-century. But in general, the influence of American-style leftism was partly responsible for the betrayal of these girls by the authorities. For example, a social worker who noticed the name "Mohammed" cropping up a lot when talking to at-risk teenagers was sent on a "diversity" course. Some of …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 02:41 AM
3

Not just Germany. Peter McLoughlin found womens' campaigners in Holland had no fear of identifying Muslim rape culture: http://lawandfreedomfoundation.org/2014/03/04/comprehensive-report-on-the-grooming-gangs/. So what's wrong with their British counterparts? American anti-racism, that's what.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 02:29 AM
0

It's depressing to see that the myth of 'campus rape culture' has crossed the Atlantic. Ignoring mere facts like the collapse of the Duke lacrosse case, the Rolling Stone story, etc., British students are rallying against sexual assault. Meanwhile, an actual rape culture - among Muslim men - went ignored, because the perpetrators aren't white. http://www.reddit.com/r/women/comments/2pp4z1/2014_a_year_of_brave_inspiring_young_feminists/ Similarly, in the USA, fake rape scares are always against w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 02:27 AM
3

Another day, another dubious 'survivor' story.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:56 AM
1

The word 'snatch' is sexist. 'Jesus_marley' is literally raping survivors.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:22 AM
1

When lying feminists and anti-racists are exposed, their supporters always fall back on the "mental issues", "disturbed young woman" approach. They try to change the focus from the political campaign which these liars are agents of, to the alleged mental problems of individuals. There's nothing mental about it. Given the dominant politics of colleges and the media, women will make up stories about rape, minorities will invent hate crimes, etc.. The only thing that will stop this happening is the…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:19 AM
1

The Alexis Jay report is not a court case. It doesn't name those it accuses. But it was organised by a professor of social work who understands the nature of evidence. Dozens of children couldn't conspire to all tell the same story if they wanted to. It's not at all like the Duke case - except both the Duke students and the Rotherham girls are victims of political correctness! Neither is it like the satanic child abuse hysteria of the 1980's which targeted many innocent people. It's certain that…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 07:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter