TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rodrigogirao Archive

View 0 posts and 898 comments by rodrigogirao on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

No, because it's not your woman. ;)
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:40 AM
-1

what my best arguments against patriarchy would be And why the hell would you do that? Instead argue in defense of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:38 AM
3

The demonization of incels is quite revealing. "Can't score? Lol, loser."
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:44 PM
2

*conflates
/r/MensRights11/09/22 06:32 AM
6

No, I think that's an after-the-fact attempt at rationalizing it.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 05:35 AM
2

The whole thread is about people saying precisely that.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:11 PM
1

In some countries, men prefer circumcised women.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:04 AM
2

Anyone sane.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:01 AM
1

I mean madness as in obvious bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:57 AM
1

the cdc has it at like 1/4 women experience completed or attempted rape. That would make America far worse than Congo during a civil war in which rape was actually used as a tool of genocide. Which is madness.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:36 AM
6

Why are you glad? It's not beneficial or necessary.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:03 AM
6

Freedom of religion doesn’t include imposing an irreversible body mod upon a non-consenting person.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 10:35 PM
10

You just have it STUCK in your head that it's something small, harmless, irrelevant. That's massively wrong.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:04 PM
9

It's killing a part of someone.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:59 PM
10

If my faith demands me to kill the infidels, should I be allowed to?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:51 PM
7

Go ahead and learn: http://cirp.org/pages/cultural/glass1/
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:47 PM
5

"Civilization is the progress of a society towards privacy. The savage’s whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men." - Ayn Rand.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:45 PM
11

Galatians 5: circumcision is worthless for those who follow Jesus. Those who let themselves be cut fall from grace and lose eternal salvation. Uh-oh.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:31 PM
6

I'd burn down the house before letting it be stolen.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:18 PM
1

Mental illnesses should be treated, not encouraged.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:38 PM
9

Any sensible person.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:09 AM
14

Look at all those losers giving a shit about a heinous violation of bodily integrity, lolololol. /s
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:40 PM
20

I wonder how they'd react if you said "I support the death penalty for people who do that, like in the Roman Empire during Hadrian's reign."
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:36 PM
8

If I asked a doctor to amputate any other body part of my son without a real medical need... that's obviously insane. And if he did it -- how is he not at fault, as much as I am?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 09:27 PM
3

It is abuse, it shouldn't be a choice at all.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:53 PM
0

Why not? They're fundamentally identical.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:52 PM
2

Not fully functional, as it causes a severe reduction of sensation and increased likelihood of erectile difficulty.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:37 PM
2

Dictionary definition of maiming: to wound or injure someone so that part of the body is permanently damaged. Does circumcision fit the definition? Certainly. It's missing a piece, how is that not damaged?
/r/MensRights06/04/22 07:34 PM
4

Pussy pass strikes again!
/r/MensRights23/02/22 09:34 AM
3

I assumed OP meant people from India.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 01:30 AM
40

Lawyer up, lawyer up, lawyer up.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 08:36 AM
33

Damn those cis people and their... ~checks notes~ ...blue-collar jobs.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 05:03 PM
8

get a vasectomy and keep it a secret Like that famous story...
/r/MensRights16/10/21 06:30 AM
-9

I would not use that word if there was no violence or coercion in any case.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:23 PM
18

Daniel Craig wanted to leave so ofc he had to die idiots. Of course he absolutely HAD to die... except he didn't every other time they replaced the main actor, idiot.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 06:00 AM
1

First learn to use punctuation. /s
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:19 AM
21

You seemingly ignore the fact that there are various types of genital mutilation, and what you describe is an extreme, RARE form of female genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:34 PM
1

Wait, is she? I thought she just drugged guys to rob them. Or am I recalling it wrong?
/r/MensRights21/03/21 06:21 AM
7

I'm saying, in a sane world, genital mutilation would be SO ABSOLUTELY UNTHINKABLE that any attempt would be seen as an absolute monstrosity worthy of nothing but prompt elimination, as one kills a rabid dog.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 08:56 AM
10

In a sane world, mutilating a child's genitals would get you hacked to pieces by an angry mob.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:27 AM
3

Every benefit of circumcision you've been told about is 100% bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 02:03 PM
2

"Why do those people complain about that thing no one complains about?" Hello there, Yogi Berra!
/r/MensRights03/10/20 12:50 AM
3

Hair is keratin. It's not alive. It doesn't feel. A foreskin is a living, functional body part.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 06:33 PM
2

It does reduce enjoyment of sex. In this sense every circumcision is a botch.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 09:45 PM
5

Gee, I dunno, but the fact that it is a heinous violation of human rights might have something to do with it.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 05:21 PM
8

In his place, I would have turned violent. Possibly murderous.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 03:34 AM
4

Actually the glans has very little erogenous sensitivity. "The two primary sensory receptors in primate skin are free nerve endings and encapsulated or corpuscular receptors. While free nerve endings (pain, itch, and temperature receptors) are found in most skin, the encapsulated receptors are concentrated in regions that require specialised touch sensitivity, such as at the fingertips, lips, external genitalia, perianal skin, and transition areas between skin and mucous membranes. ... In humans…
/r/MensRights30/09/20 11:22 PM
7

You don't know the similarities between the two procedures, do you?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 09:39 PM
8

Yes, they are fundamentally the same. To say otherwise is to have a double standard.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:38 PM
32

What's so bad about amputating part of someone's genitalia without consent or valid medical reason? Gee, I don't know.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 08:50 AM
1

14 is legal in my country, so...
/r/MensRights01/07/20 07:25 PM
5

Medical malpractice. Doctor described it in a manner that made me understand it'd be a preputioplasty.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 12:43 AM
7

All the claimed benefits smell of bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:47 PM
13

Reduces sexual pleasure A LOT (I can vouch). May cause other problems like impotence or pain during sex. In rare cases can cause even worse problems, like penile amputation, total loss of sensation, or even death due to infection or blood loss.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:40 PM
19

because i dont have to go through that later in my life The chance that you'd ever need it is, I recall reading... one in sixteen thousand.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 07:55 PM
9

"Medical" circumcision comes from the Victorian age.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 02:03 AM
7

Gliding action.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 02:03 AM
2

Homer Simpson stereotype.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 07:38 PM
1

Guest speakers: Gillette, Disney, Marvel, Cracked, Nike, Boy Scouts...
/r/MensRights29/05/20 01:13 AM
21

You know the headline: "Asteroid will end all life on earth; women most affected."
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:37 PM
1

In fact Karsten Braasch ranked 203 at the time. And yet he crushed both Williams sisters, one after the other, without even trying or taking it seriously. He said they'd have no chance against any man ranked higher than 500.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/20 05:17 AM
1

Looking back now, with all of its flaws, Terminator 3 had a great ending. I don't want to watch a movie that undoes that.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:21 AM
4

mutilate: to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts; to deprive of a limb or other essential part. Well yeah, circumcision DOES that. It damages appearance and function. So it is mutilation.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 10:58 AM
2

Yes, they are performed to reduce man's sexual capacity. That's by design.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:10 AM
3

A good, ethical doctor would not perform unnecessary and destructive procedures.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:41 PM
5

More sexual pleasure, less likely to turn impotent as you age, more natural looks.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:39 PM
3

Amputation scars are so pretty.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 07:46 AM
4

What's the logic of that? It's not healthier, it's not prettier, it just has a part missing. What's to like?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 06:53 AM
6

Get out of here, loser. If you are for circumcision, you are against men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 06:05 AM
3

Probably jealous because she can't get this sort of attention.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 04:47 PM
2

Men because women to the are left always right?
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:29 AM
8

Lawyer up, sue the company.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:37 PM
2

He isn't for a ban on it Compromising only made him look weak and lacking principles.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:36 PM
2

Morris Ah, the infamous circumcision fetishist.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 04:54 PM
5

it looks all nice and neat. Amputation scars are so pretty, huh?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:38 PM
7

I'd be worried that having a more sensitive penis would make me have less control over when I climax. Could be the opposite: less sensation means less control.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:02 PM
6

It's not done with the intent of depriving the person of anything But it was invented with that intent, and it does.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 08:25 PM
11

I can vouch that it is.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:49 PM
7

It gets people's attention and forces them to give some thought about something that was completely out of their minds.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:38 PM
19

What does the non-consensual ritual amputation of part of a man's genitalia have to do with men's rights? Gee, I dunno...
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:36 PM
15

enlighten me? Most of the sexual pleasure comes from the foreskin. And you've lost it.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:34 PM
8

All circumcisions go wrong. Some just go wronger.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:05 PM
1

ALL male mammals (except monotremes because Straya is weird) have a foreskin, sheath, or equivalent structure. To lack that is to be aberrant in the biological class.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:51 PM
1

Being common does not make it normal.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:16 AM
1

I am cut. This DOES make me abnormal. It's factually correct.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:15 AM
10

Hear of Mccarthyism? McCarthy had a point. There were, as he alleged, Soviet agents infiltrated in the US government.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 06:45 PM
6

One can ask that about you.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:06 AM
122

Lawyer up and destroy them.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 08:51 PM
11

So, literally prostitution?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:00 AM
2

don’t have to worry about dick cheese Might as well call it cunt cheese, since women produce more smegma than men.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 11:27 PM
6

If your "preference" includes maiming a child, then you and your preference can go to hell.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 11:25 PM
1

Technically, only two of those are men.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:33 AM
14

Yes, and the "artist" behind that is a talentless plagiarist.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:06 AM
7

It's called the vagina award.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 08:09 PM
1

What defines her as a slut is not keeping her bedroom clean. That's the ORIGINAL meaning of the word!
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 07:04 AM
2

dropped Which can be understood as: cancelled, shelved, gave up on it. People, PLEASE stop saying "dropped" when you mean "released".
/r/MensRights03/06/19 07:09 AM
28

Then they'll think they're protected and can get around without using condoms. It's like someone wants to make a disaster even worse.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 08:31 AM
21

No, Doobie. You are the troll.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 10:07 PM
18

It is a monstrous violation of man's human rights.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 08:35 PM
22

Circumcision is mutilation, it is delusional to reject this fact.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:40 PM
9

That comparison is terribly unfair to pedophiles.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:57 PM
22

Circumcision is mutilation. Fact, hands down, no contest, full stop. It is.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:56 PM
1

Couldn't find anything on her, but it seems the Lindin surname is originally from England and Scotland. So, unlikely.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:47 AM
1

Is a fetus a child? There's a wide gulf between "fertilized egg" and "fully formed baby". Carl Sagan suggested that personhood should come at the sixth month, when the brain developed enough to work like an adult's. But anyway, that's beside the topic here.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 05:26 PM
2

Legalized abortion would not affect infanticide among isolated native tribes.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 10:57 PM
0

when abortions are illegal, the result is not 'illegal abortion clinics' it is infanticide, abandoned babies and black market adoption. Illegal abortion clinics are definitely a thing here in Huezil.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:27 PM
19

One of those things is not like the others. Consider: You pirate because you want free stuff. Even if it is illegal, getting free stuff is still beneficial, so you do it anyway. You get a gun because it helps you protect yourself and your family from criminals. Even if it is illegal, protecting your family is still beneficial, so you do it anyway. You get an abortion because you believe that pregnancy would be a huge hindrance in your life. Even if it is illegal, eliminating a hindrance is still…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 06:17 PM
1

It's not like the government can check every boy's penis to see if it's intact. Of course they can, that's what penis inspection day is for. /s
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:33 PM
2

Wow, so entitled.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:44 PM
1

Get your French right: Fiancé is male, fiancée is female.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:51 AM
6

no suicide is justified Did you read the story? The guy was in constant severe pain.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 06:27 PM
9

So did I, and it feels much worse to me.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 06:19 PM
37

A competent doctor would know there are non-destructive treatments for phimosis. To go for circumcision as a first option rather than a last resort is demented.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 06:17 PM
1

Get real. This soy thing is a meme, a running joke.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 09:51 AM
1

It's a running joke about the theory that soy contains phytoestrogens (true) and consequently its consumption can feminize men (plausible but unproven).
/r/MensRights15/04/19 04:50 PM
182

A soy-addicted one.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 05:30 AM
16

Bodily integrity is the most fundamental human right, and circumcision clearly violates it.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 09:16 PM
9

No, he said emasculate (cut off the dick), not castrate (cut off the balls).
/r/MensRights07/04/19 03:07 PM
16

The New Testament very clearly condemns circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 02:58 PM
14

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:21 PM
2

Can someone dox that literal babyfucker?
/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:04 PM
4

Open source is a sham anyway, if you actually care about freedom you must say Free software. Regards, Stallman.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 12:47 AM
8

...and yet men-only spaces are oppressive.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:46 PM
4

That's unfair. The part about sucking bloody baby dick was literally true, mind you.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 09:43 PM
3

Somewhat crude, but his logic is sound: fanatics use the "antisemitism card" to deter criticism of their blood ritual.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 07:39 PM
1

Go team Hadrian!
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:46 AM
9

Butchers of human flesh don't belong in a civilized society.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:42 AM
7

The most fundamental human right is bodily integrity. It overrides religion any time.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:25 AM
7

But it's not applicable to all people. Fuck that noise. You don't get a license to mutilate babies because there's a stupid old myth about it.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:23 AM
1

That's a very pro-patriarchy argument: if they can't control their emotions, they should be under the authority of those who can! /s
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:31 PM
1

Where men are, dunno, 90% of the personnel?
/r/MensRights16/03/19 10:39 PM
2

Wait, using bikes is a good thing, right? And if men do more of a good thing, they should be praised, right? Wrong! Men are not allowed to excel at anything, because that's oppressive!
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:17 AM
7

Have you ever read the fable about the fox without a tail?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:49 AM
9

But man, amputation scars are so pretty!
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:47 AM
3

Here's from someone cut as an adult: wrong. Very, very wrong.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:43 PM
9

By the classical beauty standards, circumcision is one of the most disgusting things you can do to deform the human body.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:35 PM
5

What kind of sick fuck would even want to cut off a chunk of a baby's genitals?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:22 PM
13

Paul the Apostle made this clear in Galatians 5: if you try to be justified by the law (meaning, if you put your faith on the old blood ritual), you throw away Jesus' sacrifice and fall from God's grace. Any so-called Christian who circumcises is a traitor to his own faith.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:19 PM
3

You'd rather you son NOT HAVE A COMPLETE DICK, you dick.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:11 PM
3

Infant circumcision is not a decision. It is abuse.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:08 PM
6

I think I will put my kids through it Then you are not morally better than any rapist.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:07 PM
4

uncircumcised A person with a head is not "un-decapitated".
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:57 PM
1

It just means that people think everything you said is stupid.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:53 PM
1

Nonsense. Most of the world does not circumcise.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:12 AM
4

You've been deceived.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:09 AM
1

You're more likely to die from it than ever actually need it.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:08 AM
1

It does not. If you screw around, it will not protect you.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:07 AM
1

A fantasy of domination and cruelty.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:07 AM
1

It is estimated that over a hundred boys die because of circumcision every year, and that's only in the USA.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:05 AM
2

I'm saying circumcision makes no difference about HIV. It does not protect at all.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:04 AM
2

Circumcision can cause fatal blood loss or infections.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:01 AM
2

You are making no sense at all.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:56 AM
2

It is. People like that get turned on by seeing baby dick getting maimed.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:56 AM
2

Meaning it's worthless garbage.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:55 AM
2

Thats why no one who's circumcissed has HIV, except if they get in contact with HIV. Are you literally retarded? Did you ever go to a science class in your life? To have a virus you have to get in contact with the virus, well fucking duh.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:53 AM
2

One of their sources is Brian Morris, crazy circumcision fetishist.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:50 AM
7

Lies.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:47 AM
2

No, you are the one talking bullshit. There are no such cells. Real life numbers show that circumcision does not provide any of that magical protection.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:46 AM
7

Not-forced: "Doctor, please cut a piece of MY dick." Forced: "Doctor, please cut a piece of THIS OTHER PERSON'S dick."
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:43 AM
2

Circumcision does absolutely nothing to stop HIV. It only reduces sexual pleasure, and makes you more likely to suffer from problems like impotence or painful intercourse.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:41 AM
4

Almost 100% of the time they do.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:37 AM
5

You don't know what you're missing.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:37 AM
3

Likely. A study did find that cut men are 8mm "shorter" than intact men, in average.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 09:50 PM
6

He was Jewish. Lemme guess, his other penis surgery hindered its normal development?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 09:29 PM
2

Those people don't care about "empowering wymyn" or any of that nonsense. It's all about the virtue-signaling. There's something religious about the psychology of SJWs, I suspect: they just want to present themselves as heroic martyrs.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:39 AM
1

Keep these to /r/KotakuInAction/ .
/r/MensRights05/03/19 07:51 PM
12

A head is removable, just lemme grab my guillotine...
/r/MensRights01/03/19 11:22 PM
2

Well, yeah, rape by deception is a thing.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:30 PM
3

...ever letting women boss them around. ;-)
/r/MensRights28/02/19 09:22 PM
0

Quoran Raise your hand if you also thought this had something to do with Islam...
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:42 AM
3

Liberals in the American sense, or classical liberals?
/r/MensRights20/02/19 10:42 PM
5

That's crazy, Christianity condemns circumcision very clearly.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 08:30 PM
8

It's hard to describe. But try to touch an object with your lips, then touch it with your elbow. That's the degree of difference.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 07:18 PM
16

I was cut as an adult due to medical error. The loss of sensation is disheartening. It's like going half blind.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:57 PM
2

Any personal mistake you want to cover up, bub?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 11:14 PM
4

Dude, they're completely different. One cuts off part of a boy's genitals. The other cuts off part of a girl's genitals. See? Totally different!
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:28 PM
18

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:21 PM
8

To excel at anything is oppressive now.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:03 AM
26

In other news: why so many blacks don't call themselves klansmen.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:43 PM
10

To call feminists retarded is offensive to actual tards.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:05 PM
6

what should we call ourselves, the mens rights activists. Men's rights activists, duh.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:58 AM
3

If very few great films are made by women... shouldn't this mean that women are bad at filmmaking? /s
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:58 PM
1

Equality is not in most feminists' agendas.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:48 PM
2

Giving hormones to a child is certainly as bad as circumcision! Fixed, because male and female circumcision are EQUALLY bad.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 12:37 PM
3

You dissin' Android, fool? Regardless, in most cases, link+summary in pure text is better than posting a screenshot.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:07 PM
1

Well, maybe he should have posted a link and a summary, not a phone screenshot.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 06:51 PM
8

Denial. The concept that mom and dad allowed them to be abused is hard to process, so they refuse to think of it as abuse.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:29 AM
1

Femsplainer.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:32 PM
1

Here in Brazil it's common to call people doctor as a sort of social deference. It's quite ridiculous.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 09:23 PM
4

Circumcision is far, far more evil. A rapist will usually not cut off a chunk of your genitals.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 09:16 PM
4

And yet, Paul warns in Galatians 5:4 -- if you try to win God's favor by following the old Jewish laws, this does nothing but sever you from Christ.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:00 AM
6

If I went there and said, hey I'm all for feminism but I also support FGC because it's cultural and we should not judge other cultures... Oh wait, nevermind. They'd probably agree because the lefties are batshit crazy these days.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:51 AM
10

Your freedom to swing your arms ends where the next guy's nose begins.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:47 AM
3

The Jews know slavery is bad from their home in Egypt. There is no Egyptian record or physical evidence of their presence or any massive departure of slaves. The biblical pharaohs are unnamed, so there is no way to connect them to Egyptian records. In short, Exodus is a complete fiction, and the Jews were never slaves in Egypt.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:33 AM
8

I'm Christian, the Bible says I should circumcise my kids The New Testament says circumcision is a worthless chain of slavery, those who count on it to be saved actually fall from grace, and those who advocate it are perverts and scammers who upset whole families and must be silenced.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:15 AM
1

This is bait.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 09:51 PM
2

Didn't the Egyptians do it first? Also, one hypothesis says circumcision started as a way to brand slaves, and the Hebrew people formed as a coalescence of runaway slaves -- along with outlaws, rebels, displaced peasants, and other nomadic rabble from all over the Fertile Crescent.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:22 PM
1

That picture irks me because it misses the original symbolism of the "three wise monkeys". It's not about turning a blind eye to evil, but not dwelling in evil, not letting it influence your thoughts and actions. Also, fun fact: the monkeys are a pun. In Japanese: mizaru, kikazaru, iwazaru (see not, hear not, speak not). -zaru is the negative conjugation, saru is monkey.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:00 PM
5

Altering your body in any way is considered mutilation, right? Not strictly. A mutilation is an injury that disfigures, makes imperfect, or impairs functionality by removing or irreparably damaging parts. Now, given that definition, is circumcision mutilation? Yes, without a doubt.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:42 PM
3

The previous issue had a monster doctor, and no one said the comic is anti-doctor.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:39 PM
3

Bodily integrity is the most fundamental human right.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 04:12 PM
5

If it were so violent, we wouldn’t do it to babies, or at all for that matter. So? People have had very fucked up brutal traditions since always. And it doesn’t do any damage. It is a superfluous piece of skin and does not change functionality. Absolutely wrong, you really need to look into the functions of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 04:07 PM
2

He became more and more opposed to circumcision as time went on. Ultimately, he called circumcision advocates scammers and perverts who must be silenced.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:53 PM
4

It's not a decision. Unless there's a medical emergency that absolutely requires it, circumcision is abuse.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:35 PM
2

It may be medically necessary in case of tumors, gangrene, frostbite... of course, those are absurdly rare.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:34 PM
8

Circumcision is disfiguring, unless you think amputation scars are pretty.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:32 PM
7

Argumentum ad antiquitatem. By rational definition it is a mutilation.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:31 PM
2

You can't be condemned for what was not your choice, but as I said: to seek it is to reject Christ's sacrifice.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:28 PM
3

I wonder how he would have reacted if you said: "As decreed by Hadrian, circumcisers are perverts who must be put to death."
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:24 PM
3

Galatians 5 says being circumcised does not weight against you, but accepting to be circumcised, putting your faith on that yoke of slavery, will cost your salvation. Also, it says those who advocate it are deceivers who do not speak in name of Christ.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:00 PM
15

So you're against men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 06:46 AM
10

It's insane, considering that the New Testament condemns it very clearly.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 06:40 AM
25

Lol, cutting off part of someone's genitals is not genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 06:39 AM
4

So is this like bait?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 04:18 AM
2

Heavens! Was /pol/ right again?!
/r/MensRights19/12/18 03:42 AM
2

Bernstein Okay, I'd like some evidence for that. Anyone got an archive?
/r/MensRights19/12/18 03:20 AM
4

What did you expect from that place?
/r/MensRights12/12/18 09:08 PM
19

Feminism doesn't represent women's issues any more than the Klan represents whites' issues.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 12:06 AM
8

Well, it's not really new anymore, that's from 2015.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:44 AM
9

So he wants to... remove kebab from the premises? [ accordion intensifies ]
/r/MensRights04/12/18 02:56 PM
20

Fuck the UN. They day when they expelled the Republic of China (Taiwan) to let in the "red" China is the moment it should have died.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 01:33 AM
21

If women are unable to take responsibility for their actions, like children, they must be kept under the authority of someone who is able. Yay, patriarchy reinstated. /s
/r/MensRights01/12/18 01:28 AM
7

Old news, that's from 2013.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 09:08 PM
3

To be compared to a man is an honor she does not deserve.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 10:35 PM
3

At the US Open's final, an umpire caught her cheating (her coach was signaling to her from the sidelines, which is forbidden) so he deducted a game from her. She was pissed, went on a rant calling him a thief and a liar, and played the sexism card.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 08:57 AM
23

Pathetic tantrum of the year.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:10 PM
6

Hippopotamus means "river horse".
/r/MensRights13/11/18 11:08 PM
345

hipocracy It's spelled hypocrisy. Unless you truly mean "government by horses".
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:09 PM
15

Feminism has long ceased to be about equality, if it ever was.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:15 PM
55

Not at all, having only women is very diverse!
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:08 AM
6

Yeah duh, everybody knows. Doesn't mean we can't joke about it.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:13 PM
-2

wtf I love Russia now.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:12 PM
11

It's Sweden. You know the answer.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:17 AM
7

Aaaaand I got banned for replying to that. How pathetic.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:10 AM
197

Because the goal of SJWs is not to help people, but to get virtue-signaling brownie points.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:01 AM
1

Even the price is absolutely ridiculous. You can order some nice $5 cases with free shipping from China.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:14 PM
11

Everything about circumcision is bad. Wait, bad is not enough. Absolute evil is it. The act itself is abusive - call it blood ritual, it's not a surgery because it has no valid medical purpose. So it is medical fraud in the first place. It is amputation of part of your genitals, performed without your consent, usually without painkillers. That's mayhem and torture. Sometimes it goes worse and causes total emasculation, or even death by infection or blood loss. The sexual effect is negative - it …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:18 PM
4

Feminism: women's hands too small for larger phone. Also feminism: don't you dare say men and women are biologically different!
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:11 AM
7

Hadn't they found that most girls there were actually bots?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:00 AM
20

Good to see the replies are almost all very negative.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:08 AM
3

First time I heard of "anti-vax", I thought it was someone who hated DEC's computers.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:49 AM
1

In the late 20th century, as the traditional use of he to refer to a person of either gender came under scrutiny on the grounds of sexism, this use of they became more common. Yes, I know feminists tried to force a change to grammar. Excellent reason to NOT do it.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:39 AM
1

I'm not talking about this context. I'm saying it is correct grammar.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:22 AM
0

No. Fuck that singular they bullshit. Generic he is the superior form.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:10 AM
0

No, they/them is plural ONLY.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:56 AM
1

Nope. It is proper grammar.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:04 AM
-1

Never!
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:24 AM
-6

"Him" is the correct gender-neutral singular pronoun.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:02 AM
1

The patriarchy is forcing wymyn to buy Apple's bigass new phone instead of any of the countless smaller models out there.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 10:21 PM
5

Muslims and Jews were also rare in Western countries.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:44 AM
3

The justification is the difference. Circumcision was extremely rare in Western countries when "god said so" or "it's our tradition" were the only reasons. After they added the pseudo-medical reason, the numbers exploded.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:33 AM
3

Yeah, I said "medical".
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:26 AM
11

Fact: "medical" circumcision was introduced to curb masturbation, because some victorian age doctors thought that was the cause of countless illnesses. It reduces man's capacity to feel sexual pleasure, and that's fully intentional. Every claimed health benefit since then is bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 10:49 PM
5

This is not the way to convince people to come to your side. The majority of the people did support that ban.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 06:05 AM
17

Circumcision is violence. The proper task of a government is to protect each citizen from violence. Therefore, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:09 AM
2

He is right, though. They're basically the same thing. Allow both or forbid both, anything else is hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:31 PM
2

"Custom will reconcile people to any atrocity; and fashion will drive them to acquire any custom." —George Bernard Shaw
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:13 AM
9

One that is ethical? No.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:49 AM
2

Cut men are 4.5x more likely to suffer from impotence.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:45 PM
6

Circumcision is harmful. It reduces man's capacity to feel sexual pleasure. All claimed benefits are bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:41 PM
5

There are less destructive solutions.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:52 AM
14

Learn about it and you'll become strongly opposed.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:12 AM
5

Why, though? Maybe because it happened to match the branding that had already been forced upon you?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:11 AM
10

it’s because of my religion As I said: because of what you were told. Indoctrination.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:01 AM
17

because I would want it later in life You assume you would because it's all you know, and because you were told it is normal.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:56 AM
4

No, it's about the double standard. But it can also be about women failing to respect men's fundamental human rights, if you want to see it that way.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:55 AM
6

Yes, anyone who circumcises a boy after it is ruled illegal gets a trial and is punished. Just as it is done to those who cut girls. I don't see what's so complicated about that.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:48 AM
0

To hold them responsible for their actions is demonizing now?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:33 AM
4

Children have rights, parents have duties. And their main duty is to protect their children from harm. If you circumcise your child, you have failed that duty.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:29 AM
0

Do you think those fuckers who cut babies don't get aroused by it?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:22 AM
6

Women's self-determination and bodily integrity are protected, men's are not. Society has a double standard.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:20 AM
14

Yeah, self-determination and bodily integrity are irrelevant! /s
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:18 AM
11

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says forced amputations are immoral, at least.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:17 AM
6

But you are. Just as I am.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:13 AM
4

In the Roman Empire, under Hadrian, it was a capital crime. Stern but fair!
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:13 AM
5

Or the fable of the fox without a tail.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:11 AM
10

Where does your opinion come from? Reflect on this: it is a heinous crime to amputate a part of someone's body without permission or a pressing medical need. Except when it concerns that one body part. WHY?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:09 AM
4

Yeah, because amputation scars are so pretty.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:56 AM
4

It is also mostly women who perform and uphold female genital cutting.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:55 AM
-2

Reciting the pledge of allegiance makes you appear like a moron, because it was invented as a ploy to sell flags to public schools. You are literally reciting a goddamn marketing slogan!
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:52 AM
25

Your refusal to see it as mutilation does not change the fact that it is.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:49 AM
0

We are complaining because circumcision is a kind of sexual assault so we were raped.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:48 AM
3

We /r/Intactivists/ tho.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:44 AM
3

You could admit your error and try to make up for it. But to insist you did nothing wrong is dishonorable.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:41 AM
3

Basically, you are in a thread with tons of men who wish they were never circumcised, while saying they don't exist.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:37 AM
3

It's not the parents' choice. It is abuse.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:34 AM
6

Actually it is very bad in every possible way.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:31 AM
2

Infant circumcision is rape. Plus torture, plus mayhem, plus endangerment, plus organ theft, plus medical fraud...
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:25 AM
39

Christianity is against circumcision, though. Saint Paul said it is a yoke of slavery, and those who defend it are perverts and scammers.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:21 AM
2

Or have his reputation ruined by the false allegations.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:24 PM
5

Tell her to publicly recant her statements or else you'll sue her for defamation. If she doesn't, do sue her.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:38 PM
2

McCarthyism That word is a communist smearing of a man who had a pretty good point.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:21 PM
1

Hypocracy Greek for "government by what is beneath". No, it makes no sense.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:15 PM
1

I count that as rape by deception.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:55 PM
0

That’s like saying driving without a seatbelt is a suicide attempt. In a way, it is.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:20 AM
2

I'm not so sure about that. Except those rare cases of rape, or protection failing, or if you somehow reached reproductive age unaware of how this sex thing works... you can't say a pregnancy is ever unintended. If you decided to have unprotected sex, you accepted bun in the oven as a possible outcome.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:15 AM
2

Yet it is feminists who devalue or downright demonize traditionally feminine professions.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:42 PM
1

What did you expect from that place? It's like a black going to a Klan meeting and saying, 'hey, why all the fuss, we're not that bad.' Of course they're going to kick you out. Hell, you'd have a better chance trying to reason with klansmen than with those feminuts.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:36 AM
1

All I have is the New Testament.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:17 AM
5

As far from a commie as possible: "The only proper purpose of a government is to protect man’s rights, which means: to protect him from physical violence." — Ayn Rand. So, if circumcision is physical violence - and that's pretty damn obvious - this is precisely the sort of situation in which a government is supposed to act!
/r/MensRights23/07/18 10:17 AM
9

No, there can be no "right" to mutilate your child's genitals. This is not a parental right, it is abuse and nothing else.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:53 AM
7

This is a sub about men's rights and you're pretty much saying men's rights should not be legally enforced. Of course you'll be in the minority here.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 06:32 AM
7

Every possible negative effect you have just mentioned also applies to men.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 03:38 AM
2

I just point that the very term is designed to demonize men.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 04:15 PM
4

/r/Intactivists/
/r/MensRights21/07/18 04:08 PM
4

The principle is identical, the morality is the same, the differences are minutiae.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:51 PM
7

If we keep treating it as a decision that parents have the right to make at all, will it ever end? Call it what it is - abuse.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:41 PM
8

No, less pleasure. Also, increased attrition means chafing and painful intercourse are more likely.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:32 AM
17

To defend individual rights is communism now?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:30 AM
12

Sensitivity is massively reduced.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:29 AM
13

Impotence is increased by circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:26 AM
14

Most of man's sexual sensation comes from foreskin and frenulum, not the glans.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:11 AM
11

Feminist propaganda made sure people can't imagine anything but Type III.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:09 AM
22

It's not the guardian's penis, it's not the tutor's penis, it's not the father's penis, it's not the mother's penis. It is an amputation performed without consent from the only person who should be able to allow it or not.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:50 AM
14

Yes, you are.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:43 AM
16

One cuts part of a girl's genitals, and the other cuts part of a boy's genitals. Totally not the same thing!
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:38 AM
22

Can I extract a tooth from someone without consent or medical need?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:33 AM
6

Has the comments section disappeared for anyone else? I'm getting a 403 error. [edit] It's back to normal now.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:20 AM
23

It's the same in the sense that both are the partial amputation of your genitals.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:19 AM
10

Human = Hufighter.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:33 PM
4

Feminism doesn't even benefit women any more than the Klan benefits whites.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:02 AM
6

Thomas Sowell often points at that, although he concentrates on welfare's effect on black families. It makes sense that it actually harms everyone.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 05:43 PM
1

The film's odds of being successfully made, now, have just plummeted, so all they did was hurt themselves. That sounds like the way they sank Roland Emmerich's Stonewall because it was not "diverse" enough.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 07:56 AM
6

Bullshit terms like "the patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" are designed to demonize men.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:04 AM
83

Don't kink-shame Pluto.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:30 AM
0

After this her lawyer contacted mine saying they would drop charges if we did as well. No. Sue the bitch with all you got.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:24 PM
9

Seriously, who is the audience for the movie? I doubt most people are interested in this subject at all.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 07:49 PM
3

Only the Soviets did.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:23 PM
22

Men have no right to bodily integrity.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:11 AM
102

But babies men aren't people aderp herp Fixed.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 11:55 PM
1

Of course there is an order. It is fine to help others, but not if this causes your own children to be neglected.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:40 AM
3

If they had made it with men, I bet the reception would be even worse: "A remake, already? Fuck this shit."
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:44 PM
6

Regardless, it shows how unimaginative Hollywood is these days. We get remake after remake. Sequel after sequel. Adaptations of comic books, cartoons, toy lines, whatever. Original ideas? Fuck that, recycling is easier!
/r/MensRights14/06/18 04:40 AM
3

This is so silly, you may be trying to make us look bad by association.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:33 AM
1

This is bait.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:38 AM
0

Can you imagine getting cut at an age you can remember? If "he can't remember" makes it right, rape with roofies must be legalized as well.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:13 AM
1

Yes it is. Pic evidence. (Obviously NSFW.)
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:11 AM
2

Those dubious claims of minimal benefits are not genuine medical needs. What would be? A phimosis that couldn't be fixed by any other method. Foreskin cancer. Gangrene. Frostbite. If you can say "we must do this, or else the kid will die / will lose the whole thing / will be crippled for life" - now that is an actual medical need. And it's super rare.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 12:37 AM
1

No, because the people behind the cameras - cough - may have some bias in casting choice.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 12:31 AM
1

You're denying obvious blatant reality.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:22 PM
3

They force themselves to act happy because reality is too depressive to face.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:16 PM
1

An amputation that was performed on someone else's whim, with no consent or actual medical need. Call it melodramatic, but that's what it is.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:14 PM
2

Aesthetics By classical (Greco-Roman) beauty standards, it's among the most repulsive and obscene ways to ruin the beauty of the human form. It was so intensely detested, Hadrian made it a capital crime.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:12 PM
5

Do you believe in individual rights or not? Circumcision stems from a collectivist train of thought: someone has power over someone else's body.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:07 PM
3

EXTREMELY rarely, if doctors were not ignorant of non-destructive ways to fix phimosis.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:04 PM
2

Circumcision: when we make a baby take it like a man because a man would not do.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:45 PM
2

Someone without a foot or hand has less body.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:42 PM
3

It is not a medical procedure when there is no genuine medical need.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:39 PM
9

Because there is no death penalty in Croatia.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:01 AM
2

Oh no, here comes one now!
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:59 AM
3

thisisbait.jpg
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:56 AM
2

I thought "pussy" referred to house cats, because they are small and easily frightened.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 12:49 PM
4

Officially, Christianity is very strongly opposed to circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:17 PM
12

I think the point is: a male soldier would be expected to withstand this kind of treatment without turning into a blubbering mess.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 09:15 PM
29

I heard they're furious because the Boy Scouts are trying to steal their clientele.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:20 PM
30

I suspect that term is designed to demonize masculinity altogether.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:59 PM
9

"I'm circumcised and I'm fine", say most circumcised women as well. Yet we know beyond doubt that they are mutilated. And yet we refuse to say the same of circumcised men.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 03:04 AM
2

The expression "toxic masculinity" is designed to demonize masculinity and men as a whole.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:31 PM
30

Also Feminists: Women are biologically superior. Masculinity so fragile! Also, masculinity oppressed wymyn throughout history!
/r/MensRights22/04/18 02:14 AM
11

Neat, but my favorite is still this.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 09:42 PM
10

Meninism is a parody of feminism.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:37 AM
4

And how much are those pounds in kilograms?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 06:15 AM
11

Lawyer up, always.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 02:39 AM
1

You should never hit a lady. Key word here: Lady (n.) a woman who is refined, polite, and respectable; whose manners and sensibilities befit her for high rank in society. Not all women are ladies, just as not all men are gentlemen. A woman who acts with unwarranted violence is clearly not a lady, but a bitch, who has no such protected status, and whose uncivil behaviour must receive a prompt, vehement, and deterring response.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:41 PM
8

It's pronounced "trijered"!
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:30 PM
36

That jpg compression triggers me.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:10 PM
0

I doubt women can even score one medal in a open gender competition. Oh, they would. They'd rig the games and sabotage men until it happens.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:44 PM
24

Except it seems that's not true.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 03:07 AM
657

But, if it's confirmed that she shot her boyfriend, it's a solid reminder that women do commit domestic violence.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:29 PM
2

double mastication I don't know what rumination has to do with breasts.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 01:59 PM
11

Yeah, the correct name is "femsplaining".
/r/MensRights26/03/18 08:43 PM
15

shero The stupid, it burns.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:41 PM
5

Here. Thuggee was a secret cult whose members, both Muslims and Hindus, worshipped Mother Kali, the goddess of destruction. They operated as gangs of highway robbers, tricking and later strangling their victims.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:33 PM
10

It's different. Those eliminate defects. Circumcision creates one.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:31 PM
5

Fine, let's look at it from a Christian point of view: Saint Paul stated in very clear terms that circumcision is mutilation, and those who defend it are frauds and sexual perverts whose lies upset whole families and therefore must be silenced.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:28 PM
3

The writer is a Jew. Circumcision is strongly condemned in the New Testament.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:14 PM
10

This is hilarious. Major loss of sexual sensation. Increased likelihood of erectile difficulty. Increased friction, increased likelihood of chafing and painful intercourse. Risk of total emasculation. Risk of fatal blood loss. Risk of fatal infections. Wow, is this the script for a comedy or what.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:12 PM
4

A crazy moral panic in England painted masturbation as the cause of countless health problems.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 10:45 AM
6

The author is an Orthodox Jew.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 10:43 AM
8

Did you choose it for yourself, as an adult, fully informed of possible side effects? If not, then it's unethical.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 10:36 AM
5

To call it the wrong name is not simplifying, it's just misleading. What is it? They may be misleading you.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 01:50 PM
116

Some animals are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 01:21 PM
6

That's an ex post facto rationalization. It was never about that. Among Jews, it was a tribal marker eventually calcified by myth. Among gentiles, it was the consequence of a Victorian Age moral panic against masturbation.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:10 PM
37

The post right below this is: "Boys Often Don’t Recognize When They’ve Been Sexually Assaulted". Clearly, some don't recognize when they've been sexually mutilated either.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 06:35 PM
20

F That, I love my circumcised vulva. I’d hate to have to wait until an adult to make that decision, and am thankful my parents did that for me as a baby. This is a family cultural thing and not your decision. Same thing.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:35 PM
8

Why the hell are locker rooms open to outsiders at all?!
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:06 AM
5

It's deceit, no matter if pre-op or post-op.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 06:55 AM
6

In the sense that it is a wymxn obeying commands from men, and that's problematic.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:12 PM
15

Feminists complain of the same fact, as a female voice is perceived as submissive.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:26 PM
3

I'm pretty sure most pedophiles don't want kids to be maimed and tortured either.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:53 AM
2

k thx bye
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:36 AM
9

No, there's too much cheerleading around this topic, and people DO regret it. As Dani Bunten said: Despite following the rules and being as honest as I could with the medical folks at each stage, nobody stopped me and said "Are you honest to God absolutely sure this is the ONLY path for you?!"
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:35 AM
6

Here's a possible one. If s/he regrets it, and if s/he had a surgery, then s/he may find him/erself with an ersatz of the opposite sex's sex instead of the real thing. And then, "what the hell was I thinking".
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:26 AM
36

Topic aside, you know what I hate? People who write like this I mean seriously, why can't you just work out your thoughts and write it all in a single block of text, so that it's easy to read and understand?!
/r/MensRights03/03/18 07:38 AM
3

But it says: DO think twice.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 07:48 AM
5

References: Morris, B.J. Morris. INTO THE TRASH IT GOES!
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:28 PM
2

Of course, that's the left-wing logic: anything we don't like is LITERALLY HITLER!
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:07 AM
5

Shove it, baby torturer.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:33 AM
5

Just how innocent are you, man? To allow sheep to escape the flock? No, no, that is a tragedy, absolutely unacceptable, it will be the end of our people, literally another shoah, and so on. You don't get how deeply fanatical about this they are.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:18 AM
10

Circumcision is designed to harm. All claims of benefits are meant to keep the gravy train running.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 04:17 PM
5

Of course kids won't want to, unless they're brainwashed to want to.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:16 AM
23

Banning human sacrifices limits the Aztecs' religious freedom.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:13 AM
1

S/he denied it, but... wait and see.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:45 AM
10

Bishops and Cardinals Who somehow failed to read the New Testament enough to find it condemns circumcision in very strong terms.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:13 AM
0

I will now emphasize the word emphasize: Let me emphasize this. See?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:39 PM
1

Monster Musume, anyone?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:26 AM
19

It's been clear for a while that he's not much of a man...
/r/MensRights07/02/18 10:32 PM
53

This comes to mind.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 11:22 AM
9

Cultural Marxism.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 08:07 PM
13

How dare men excel at something?!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 10:17 PM
9

And blacks should take a stronger voice supporting the Klan.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 08:44 AM
2

That trashy design makes me assume it's low-quality chocolate, the kind that almost tastes like soap.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:00 PM
0

Monster Musume, anyone?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:33 AM
7

How about: "Not all klansmen are the same. Most have never lynched anyone!"
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:51 PM
41

A logical argument probably won’t get me anywhere. If that's not a big-ass RED ALERT about her, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 07:54 PM
-1

A miserable little pile of secrets. But enough talk, have at you!
/r/MensRights17/01/18 09:58 PM
3

Since the left wing tends to support feminism, I guess it's kind of unavoidable to lean the opposite way.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:52 PM
1

WHAT is controversial? I don't even understand the point you're trying to make.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:40 AM
1

And your point is...?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 10:56 AM
2

Well, I don't know about your specific situation, but it's definitely not just about the glans drying out. You really should look into other solutions.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:23 PM
1

Phimosis? There are very effective, non-destructive alternatives.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 04:13 PM
5

Stop, change your plans, you WILL regret it.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 04:09 PM
3

I can vouch to the contrary, sadly. Circumcision causes a massive loss of sexual sensation.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 04:05 PM
14

Most sexual sensation comes from the frenulum and the foreskin's ridged band.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:39 AM
9

And it has little sexual sensitivity in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 02:46 AM
25

Science says otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 02:04 AM
74

See Jane Go Bankrupt.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 01:07 AM
1

Didn't he rape The Magic Roundabout?
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:19 PM
3

cases in us vs cases in uk Except you didn't adjust for population size.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 09:42 PM
28

Daily reminder that the founder of the world's first shelter for abused women was threatened and slandered by the feminist movement for trying to open one for abused men.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 12:55 AM
2

Cultures can be analyzed and found to be superior or inferior. As a whole, or in specific parts. To believe all cultures are equally good and valid is feel-good nonsense.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:04 PM
20

You know, a bad Yelp review works wonders. Do it.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:17 AM
1

Men can't be allowed to excel. Feminist logic = Harrison Bergeron logic.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:49 PM
3

Advisable? No. Hilarious? Yes.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 12:14 AM
29

Where is WHO? UN? Too busy promoting circumcision.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 04:32 PM
1

How unfair. Child-rearing and house-keeping are tremendously important activities, even though feminists vilify them.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 05:59 PM
0

I didn't bother seeing the previous one, because I hated what JJ Hackbrams had done to Star Trek.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 05:57 PM
10

Indeed, a man: only an adult man, fully warned about the possible negative consequences, can decide about performing such a modification of his own body. Anything else is aggravated battery.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:21 AM
7

Imgur's "community" is some serious cancer.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:16 AM
20

Shouldn’t it just be up to fathers? No, it should be up to no one except the owner of the penis.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:13 AM
15

Except they're extremely common, more like a coin toss.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:04 AM
4

Like you go around groping people.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:56 PM
11

I have a hunch that you are a sexual molester.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:02 PM
3

The way you write is terrible. You can't just say "this guy sucks" and post a link. You have to summarize what he said.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:15 AM
1

Sarcasm?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:26 AM
6

In many countries, FGM is seen as perfectly normal and harmless, just as male circumcision is seen in the US. Read this.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 10:09 AM
34

My dick is not mutilated because it's circumcised Sorry, pal. It is.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:34 PM
1

Well, people used to marry rather young. "Sex only within marriage" would be more reasonable if that was still the case.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 10:35 AM
5

Lawyer up, right now!
/r/MensRights02/12/17 07:55 AM
31

If only they still did.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:45 PM
11

I've heard of such rumors before, but you should provide at least a link. Like this.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:38 PM
3

Gender Critical is a radical feminist subreddit to discuss gender from a critical perspective. From that alone, I know you should stay away from it.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:33 PM
3

Pic related.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:39 AM
8

You said lots of words, and yet you failed to answer the question. What law gives men an unfair advantage over women? Nothing comes to mind. In the Western world, women are legally privileged. There may be specific instances of bad laws affecting women, but they're not widespread.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 06:04 AM
2

As the "three worlds" system is about political alignment during the Cold War, that's impossible by definition. Unless the Cold War resumes.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:23 AM
1

But it may be wise to word it in a manner that is not so inflammatory.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:34 AM
6

effects That's effectively wrong.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:42 AM
11

Are you a troll? Is this bait? Discuss.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:21 AM
2

fuck a box Dude. Check what you wrote before posting.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 01:41 AM
5

How about cultural myopia: what "they" do is bad, what "we" do is good - even if they're essentially the same.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:06 AM
2

This looks like bait.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:14 PM
6

Reminder that Wikipedia removed any references to that from their article about alexithymia.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:18 PM
4

A couple of nobodies who are already convicts, how convenient. The way he's built it up, you'd expect a ton of big names, but now he wants $10M to do an exposé documentary. Something doesn't smell right, even Corey Haim's mother says it's a con. So, take it with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:00 PM
32

Well, a "massage" is often an euphemism for prostitution, so this could be just a misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:51 PM
5

They can be used in the same sense.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:19 PM
1

Girls do hit puberty a bit earlier.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 08:41 PM
20

Problems that actually require a circumcision are extremely rare, usually there are less destructive ways to deal with them. It should be a desperate last resort, never a routine procedure. Besides, it sounds like your family was bamboozled by a bad doctor. See, when you're born, the foreskin is fused to the glans. It detaches with time, and it's perfectly normal if you can't retract it until puberty kicks in.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:55 AM
19

If you sew a girl's vulva shut, you can be pretty sure she will be free from venereal diseases by the time she gets married. That's beneficial to men's health, right? So why don't they support it?
/r/MensRights24/10/17 05:51 AM
1

Octothorpe me too!
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:36 AM
2

Yeah. But you know, after a marxist deleted the page about cultural marxism, it should surprise no one that there's some crazy left-wing bias going on there.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:46 PM
11

The inmates are running the asylum now.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:59 PM
26

Yeah, they intervened against me for undoing their vandalism. Figures.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:19 AM
17

And they killed it again.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 09:21 PM
15

A classic. Bank teller: "Sorry, ma'am, the check bounced." Prostitute: "Oh my gosh, I was raped!"
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:54 AM
3

There are campaigns aimed at various groups, but none specifically for men.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:11 PM
2

The whole situation actually reeks of executive meddling.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:15 AM
2

Why can't I be a klansman for black rights?
/r/MensRights30/08/17 09:43 PM
-1

I see no point in making a fool out of a child. It's just humiliating.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:58 PM
0

Sometimes a lie can be the right thing. But this one is pointless through and through.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 07:16 PM
1

Bullshit. An abstraction and an outright falsehood are vastly different things.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:03 PM
1

That would only teach that justice, duty, and mercy can be dismissed as easily as Santa.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:02 PM
-5

Thank goodness I was not one of them. I'd hate to be friends with a cunt like you.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 06:13 AM
1

This one, because it's so unnecessary. It's disgusting because children naturally trust their parents, and being made a fool of is hurtful.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 06:11 AM
4

Actually, yes, they are taken for precocious puberty. It's a real thing. Look into it.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:28 AM
2

That sounds to me like a post hoc rationalization.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:40 AM
-7

Think people would tell you if they did?
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:17 PM
-18

It's a violation of trust.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:10 PM
-27

It's not a fantasy, it's a lie. It's unethical.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:26 PM
26

It's still society's fault for the 3 year old, for telling him Santa Claus is real in the first place.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:40 PM
1

I suppose that rule made sense in the early 20th century, when women wore those long dresses.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 12:46 AM
3

Legalize terrorism because jihad is protected by freedom of religion!
/r/MensRights22/08/17 10:21 PM
1

It's "affect".
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:56 AM
4

see how fast you get bullied And banned.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 03:56 PM
8

Then those people are hypocrites, even if they don't realize it. You can't say you support human rights when you don't support the most essential one, the right to bodily integrity.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:18 AM
2

According to Paul, people who defend circumcision have a fetish for it or make money from it. They are perverts who spread lies and disharmony, therefore they must be silenced. And to put your faith on old blood rituals means to reject salvation.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 07:44 PM
1

No, I'm saying it's nothing new. It's a valid observation of human behavior.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 04:18 AM
4

Read this. They perform FGM "medically", with the same sort of reasoning an American doctor would use to justify male circumcision. And that's the point: it's all pseudo-scientific, pseudo-medical excuses to something that actually makes zero sense. There is no fundamental difference between them, to believe so is to be culturally myopic.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 03:03 AM
17

When a woman says "I circumcised my son because I find that more attractive", how is that not sexually perverted?
/r/MensRights20/08/17 02:01 AM
6

It's definitely sexual for many sickos who support it. And this is nothing new, even the Bible says so. Paul the Apostle says those who defend circumcision are dogs, which in the context means sexual deviants.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 01:40 AM
2

Where does that 81% number come from, though? The Middle-East?
/r/MensRights19/08/17 09:20 PM
12

Feminists want a monopoly of victimhood.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 12:23 AM
2

No big deal, the emus did it first.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:40 AM
7

Feminism is a hate ideology.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:39 AM
5

Isn't that what the Bloodstained Men do?
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:56 PM
8

I'm a man I'm skeptical of this claim.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 04:52 PM
2

Try this analysis. Paul's view of circumcision was much more negative than you seem to imply. He called its advocates frauds and perverts.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:16 AM
4

"Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace." -- Galatians 5:2-4.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:10 AM
16

More politely: you have double standards. Male circumcision and female circumcision are identical in principle. Any differences are irrelevant minutiae.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 11:56 PM
5

If you actually read the New Testament, it's clear that Christianity is very strongly opposed to circumcision. If you put any faith on it, you fall from God's grace and lose eternal salvation.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 11:51 PM
20

Circumcision is clearly disfiguring. It gives your member an unnatural scarred appearance. By the classical (Greco-Roman) standard of beauty, it was so absolutely abhorrent, Emperor Hadrian made it a capital crime.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 11:43 PM
7

If it was traditional for people to cut off their pinkies, you'd say, "Lol, five fingers are so weird."
/r/MensRights30/07/17 07:59 PM
95

Muh genetics!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/17 10:52 PM
13

She tried to ruin innocent lives, to have her life ruined is a fair punishment.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 12:32 PM
23

A package or rape, torture, mayhem, endangerment, organ theft, and medical fraud. Absolute evil.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:15 PM
6

Yeah, they hack away at his dick with specific dick-hacking instruments. Same result, though.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:12 AM
2

Follow the principle: In dubio pro reo.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 12:52 AM
6

Be firm. "Give up or I will dump you." And if she won't, actually do.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 12:05 AM
1

Then again, some people don't deserve the honor of being called a man.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 08:22 PM
3

How to be a garbage human: be Anita Sarkeesian.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 04:35 PM
25

The point is, there is no pity for the man and whatever he was suffering, his only worth was relative to his usefulness to others.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 04:27 PM
11

My dad thought my Doctor had performed a female genital mutilation - turns out it was just a male genital mutilation. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 03:54 AM
3

Why can't a woman be more like a man? Men are so honest, so thoroughly square. Eternally noble, historically fair. Who, when you win, will always give your back a pat. Why can't a woman be like that?
/r/MensRights22/07/17 03:49 AM
10

© Copyright 2016 CircInfo.net Professor Brian J. Morris. Fuck that guy.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:51 PM
0

The correct phrase is: never hit a lady. Now, a lady is a woman who has refined, decorous manners. Not all women are ladies, just as not all men are gentlemen. So this rule does not apply to aggressive, ill-mannered women, colloquially called bitches.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 06:37 PM
17

1 - It reduces man's sexual pleasure and causes several other issues, some extremely grave. 1.5 - A culture that demands you to be mutilated is a culture that deserves to die. 2 - All claims of health benefits are false. Actual need is absurdly rare. 3 - It is a violation of essential human rights. There can be no compromise here.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:38 PM
4

Because wymyn are entitled to a man's attention and wallet.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:08 PM
7

Confused klansman here. Aren't we and the negroes on the same side? /s
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:17 PM
15

Hey, just because I'm a feminist, doesn't mean I can't join the klan! /s
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:23 PM
8

That's still a very high number, especially if you consider that all of those circumcisions were completely unnecessary in the first place.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:35 AM
5

It's more common than you think.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:06 AM
10

Cut men are 4.5x more likely to be users of a medicine for erectile dysfunction.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 12:48 AM
11

Say it without euphemisms: "I'm glad someone cut off a piece of my penis." Why?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:37 PM
1

Just because they want to play with toys that are not right for their age group, doesn't mean they want to break the toys.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:25 PM
14

In very rare cases. If doctors were properly educated about more conservative treatments for phimosis, it would virtually disappear.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:08 PM
18

Circumcised men are far more likely to suffer from sexual impotence, for one.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:58 PM
18

A good one would refuse to perform this useless and destructive procedure.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:56 PM
2

No. To think being circumcised is better (outside of a very tiny handful of medically justified situations) is simply absurd.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:54 PM
2

I don't need to continue. There are only two possibilities here. 1, you're in denial, or 2, you're just crazy.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:26 PM
2

Indeed, those grapes must be very sour!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:17 PM
2

Since we know the tale of Exodus is a complete fiction, that's a bit dubious.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:13 PM
6

But Christianity is opposed to circumcision. The Apostle Paul made clear that those who push it are perverts and scammers, and those who put their faith on it will lose eternal salvation.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:10 PM
3

I try and watch a porn video with an uncircumcised penis and any horniness I had is completely gone. Maybe because it's a humiliating reminder of your own damage.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:25 PM
1

I bet most pedophiles would take offense to that claim.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:23 PM
4

But is it not justified?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:36 PM
3

Because nothing says "less prone to infection" like a raw wound in a shit-filled diaper.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 05:59 AM
3

(mostly) useless piece of skin Augh, ignorant!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 05:56 AM
5

Uncircumcised vulvas are gross looking, that's just how I feel. Keep cutting those girls!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:58 AM
9

By the classical standards of beauty, circumcision is one of the most disgusting things you can do to your body. The Romans abhorred it so much, Hadrian made it a capital crime. Stern but fair!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:56 AM
5

By that logic, I could poke out a baby's eyes and that's all right. He can't miss sight because he won't remember having it!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:50 AM
3

How are you better off for losing a part of your genitals?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:48 AM
13

So a crime would happen either way, but you made yourself accessory to it.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:52 PM
13

Circumcision is not a "decision", it is abuse.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:48 PM
3

What I want and what is feasible are different things.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:13 PM
14

No, just like you amputate a chunk of their genitals and convince them that was in their best interests somehow. A bit different, see.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:10 PM
2

No, idiot, I'm not proposing anything. I'm just saying this would be more likely, at least in the short run.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:04 PM
11

You only tell yourself "it's better like this" because the actual better alternative is beyond your reach.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:02 PM
13

in fact I even prefer it this way. And those grapes were sour anyway.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:56 PM
1

I've been told no imprisonment would happen Would and should are different things. Ideally, circumcisers should get DEATH. But that's just my opinion.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:55 PM
16

Translation: it's okay to harm your kid, as long as you brainwash him into believing that the harm was a good thing.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:49 PM
9

Feel free to start regretting.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:46 PM
17

Actual medical need for circumcision is absurdly rare, like 1 out of 16,000.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:45 PM
17

"I'm cutting your genitalia to make it pretty" is very fucked up.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:44 PM
19

Still not good enough, because all the pros are false.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:43 PM
14

You believe - likely have been told your whole life - that your surgically altered condition is "normal". It is not.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:41 PM
5

Except it is true. It's not PC to do anything that might offend them.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:38 PM
9

Yes, I want to arrest (or do worse, much worse) people who torture and mutilate babies. Your point?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:37 PM
13

I'm actually glad Do you prefer a self-delusion or the harsh truth?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:36 PM
15

It is forbidden for Christians, actually... but USA-style Christianity is crazy like that.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:34 PM
3

No one wants to make all circumcision a crime Do you want to allow voluntary female genital cutting?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:31 PM
14

It's nothing like FGM! Okay, have your downvote.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:30 PM
10

As much as the Klan is for race equality.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:54 PM
26

There are many circumcised men that would not agree with this diagram. Because most of them have no idea what having a normal body feels like.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:13 PM
1

You're mixing a Latin prefix and a Greek suffix, mine was all Greek.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:22 PM
1

Your points are irrelevant or culturally biased.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:14 PM
1

hippocracy That would mean "government by horses". You mean hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:12 AM
2

Force culture to change.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:07 AM
1

If a man prefers a circumcised vulva, you can't force him to stop liking what you don't like!/s
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:06 AM
2

Downvotes for expressing a disgusting opinion.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:05 AM
3

In the New Testament, repeatedly.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:14 AM
3

Every circumcision is a botch. Some are just botchier than intended.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:04 PM
6

Not in 'Murica, where Christians circumcise, even though Christianity is strongly opposed to circumcision.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:55 PM
15

Maybe you should cut that toxic woman from your kid's life.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:54 PM
2

Never forget: hate speech laws were invented by the Soviets to suppress criticism.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:50 AM
6

I would've rather been circumcised when I was younger to avoid the hassle and consciousness, or rather memory, that I'd have now of the pain. Actual medical need of circumcision is absurdly rare, something like 1 out of 16 thousand. You're more likely to die from it than ever need it. In truth, "medical" routine circumcision was invented to curb masturbation during a Victorian age moral panic that painted "self-abuse" as the cause of countless illnesses. See, it is intended to reduce man's sexua…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:33 AM
5

I suppose you are against female circumcision, right? So take those reasons and apply them without double standards. Understand that male and female circumcision are the EXACT SAME THING.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 01:56 AM
4

It is not a valid medical procedure. It is a thinly veiled blood ritual.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 08:24 AM
5

And where did circumcision come from? Oh right, Abraham, the person whom an entire category of religions gets its name(abrahamic) from. And yet Christianity is strongly opposed to circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 08:23 AM
6

"Medical" circumcision was invented to hinder masturbation, because there was a moral panic that painted it as the cause of countless diseases. There was never any actual benefit. It just reduces man's sexual pleasure - that's what it was always meant to do.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 08:18 AM
1

A male feminist is like a black klansman. Why be part of a movement that hates you?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:27 AM
10

Well duh, Erin Pizzey said that all the way back in the 1970s. She founded the world's first shelter for abused women -- and, by talking to her guests, found that most of them were as abusive to their partners as the other way around.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 07:37 AM
2

I hope all those 5% get a beating from a psycho bitch.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:21 AM
1

Stereotypically: black, male, teenager or young adult, stemming from poorer areas of major cities; often of limited formal education, behaves in a loutish manner, and may be involved in gang activities.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:03 AM
4

Urban males, in contrast to rural males?
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:30 AM
1

I recall reading that she despised them for defending the right positions without knowing the proper philosophical grounds for doing so, which ultimately undermines those same positions.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 11:04 PM
3

Do you suppose that amputating a body part has no effect?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:55 PM
1

Or maybe they are, but just can't point at the reason.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:35 PM
7

Your culture is disgusting.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:30 PM
3

Sour grapes. He has to tell himself it's a good thing, otherwise he'd have to face an unpleasant reality.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:27 PM
2

If it lacks a foreskin, it is not normal. It is not only different from most humans, it is different from every mammal.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:01 AM
3

Would you say circumcised women are "broken", even though the vast majority of them is still capable of a satisfactory sex life, orgasms and all?
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:01 PM
2

Actual medical need for circumcision is so absurdly rare, you're more likely to die from it than ever need it.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:59 PM
1

If your dick is missing a piece, I'd say it looks weird.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:58 PM
2

Actually, it depends how much you manage to mangle the hand.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:53 PM
7

Ignoring my opinion that the intended purpose of MGM is much different than the intended purpose of FGM. Except they do have the same goal: to reduce sexuality as a tool of social control.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:19 PM
10

The relatively mild form of female circumcision is the most common form. And there are more extreme forms of male genital cutting. Comparing the most common form of both, it is clear that male circumcision is more destructive.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:16 PM
12

He is to blame for performing a medically unnecessary and harmful procedure. Every so-called doctor who performs infant circumcisions is a villain.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:12 PM
2

Was it an informed decision, though? Were you fully warned about the possible side effects -- loss of sensation, dyspareunia, erectile dysfunction, and so on?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:02 PM
2

And yet... answer me this: should a woman be allowed to get a circumcision for herself? Here the double standard will kick in, many will argue that she's controlled by religion (it's usually a Muslim thing you see), brainwashed into destroying herself, and she must be stopped for her own good.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:17 AM
5

Let's go back to the "sawing limbs" thing, then. Sometimes sawing limbs is necessary. But you don't saw limbs on a whim, if you did you'd be locked up in a mental asylum for life. Circumcision is a kind of "sawing limbs" so it should follow the same rules: do it when there's an extremely serious medical need for it, but that need is absurdly rare.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:12 AM
9

Brian Morris And into the trash it goes.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:05 AM
8

Go to Pfizer's site and search for their financial reports, like this.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:53 PM
8

Circumcision is sexual assault. Also: torture, mayhem, medical fraud, organ theft...
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:04 AM
3

If I don't know what I'm missing, I can't miss it right? By that logic, it's okay to remove a baby's eyes.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:25 AM
0

I do and I hate it.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:18 AM
13

I have no recollection of the event. If that's a justification, then rape with roofies is okay too.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:13 AM
9

So are most circumcised women.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:06 AM
3

Consider this: in the Congo civil wars, mass rape was literally used by all parties as a tool of genocide. So there were ~200,000 cases of sexual violence, in a population of ~44 million people. Assuming half the population is female, 200,000 out of 22 millions, that's still 1 out of 110. That's why those numbers have to be bullshit, or use a completely crazy definition of rape that includes things like groping or catcalling or even "stare rape" or "fart rape" or whatever feminuts decided to cal…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:30 AM
2

Mind you, most mutilated women will speak in favor of their own mutilation.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:36 AM
1

They ARE the same in every way... except whether the victim is male or female.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:35 AM
5

It works fully as intended. Don't be so sure. You probably feel an amount of sexual pleasure that's vastly reduced from what it should be, but you can never know the difference.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:33 AM
3

The person who is actually affected still didn't consent.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:31 AM
1

Lad culture! I'm triggered now! /s
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:30 AM
10

This topic makes me agressive and I won't apologize for that. And consider this: the USA, less than 5% of world's population, is almost 50% of Viagra's consumer market. Genetics, my ass! You don't amputate up to half the penile surface without consequences.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:47 PM
10

Are you too dumb to get satire?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:19 PM
4

You think circumcision and FGM are even remotely the same? Not "remotely", I think they are essentially identical.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:06 PM
16

Precisely the point, duh.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:02 PM
11

Are you grateful for something that reduces sexual pleasure, greatly increases the likelihood of impotence, and gives you an unnatural appearance?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:01 PM
6

Boys who are circumcised just view it as normal Until they realize it is not.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:42 AM
2

I wonder how many readers you've lost over this retarded bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 06:42 PM
17

They also provide other reproductive health services and sexual education. Abortions are ~3% of their services.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:44 AM
11

Is 1 in 5 bad enough for you? Consider the following: in the Congo civil wars, there were ~200,000 cases of sexual violence, in a population of ~44 million people. Assuming half the population is female, that'd be ~1 in 110. You are saying, therefore, that a woman is 22 times more likely to be raped in the USA, a wealthy country, during peacetime, than in some African dictatorship during a bloody civil war where mass rape was literally used by all parties as a tool of genocide. And that's why "1…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:13 AM
2

It can be. Rape does not necessarily mean unconsented penetration.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 01:50 AM
4

Most circumcised women will also tell you everything functions rather well.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:45 PM
15

No, and the hygiene excuse is also bullshit, just an attempt to rationalize this abomination.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:13 AM
5

And that son of a bitch Bill Gates.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:41 AM
3

Doctors also used to recommend burning girls' clits with acid to stop self-abuse.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:40 AM
14

By that logic: when we're drunk, we can't wipe our butts, so let's get a colostomy!
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:31 AM
8

Messing with someone's genitals without consent is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:17 AM
7

Except I am not being hyperbolic at all.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 05:55 AM
4

Rape, torture, mayhem, endangerment, organ theft, medical fraud... take your pick.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 05:27 AM
13

Actually, comparing the most common form of each, male genital cutting is probably more damaging.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 05:18 AM
11

So is female genital cutting in many places.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 04:44 AM
17

By the classical (Greco-Roman) standard of beauty, it's one of the ugliest things you can do to your body.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 04:43 AM
9

Only in 'Murica, because the New Testament clearly forbids it: Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace. -- Galatians 5:2-4
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:32 AM
12

Pins and patches, the feminist standard of proof.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:18 AM
1

Maybe women are more miserable because of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:45 PM
9

It is rape, torture, mayhem, medical fraud, organ theft, endangerment...
/r/MensRights11/01/17 08:49 AM
3

Their study, co-authored with the founder of the pro-Democratic campaign So this is literally the losing side making up excuses for their poor performance.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 10:14 PM
1

Just leave a comment... oh wait, it's locked. Why, I wonder.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 09:57 PM
5

Circumcision was "medicalized" in the Victorian era as an attempt to hinder masturbation during a moral panic that claimed "self-abuse" was the cause of several illnesses. They also used to burn girls' clits with acid for the same reason.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:52 AM
21

She could just ask Andy Murray (or any man in the current ATP Rankings) to play a friendly match and test that theory. But we all know how that would end...
/r/MensRights27/12/16 06:06 PM
11

Also featured: "Why do we love the poop emoji so much?" This isn't your average everyday stupid. This is... advanced stupid.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 01:13 AM
14

Well, there was a woman who tried to create an all-female TV company. It didn't end well.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:17 AM
9

If it wasn't for the absurd notion that religions are inherently deserving of tolerance, anyone caught doing this would be lynched by a furious mob.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 07:56 PM
1

I'm still waiting for you to present, in your own words, any ethical justification for performing an unnecessary, defacing, and potentially crippling body modification without pressing medical need, and without the patient's consent, based on nothing but a whim from a parent - or even, sometimes, without the parents' permission. Hell, you're so delusional, you couldn't accept the very self-evident fact that cutting off a body part is an amputation. I believe you have never given it any thought -…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:22 PM
1

Massively flawed, culturally biased literature. Much of it probably from fraud Brian Morris and his clique.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:27 PM
1

Still waiting for you to attempt to justify amputating body parts of non-consenting infants without a genuine medical need...
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:56 PM
2

You are so blind, you can't recognize the most obvious fact about your actions.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:17 PM
4

In the immortal words of Sinistar: "Run, coward!"
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:11 PM
2

You have amputated body parts from non-consenting infants, without a smidgen of actual medical need, thus violating their essential human right to bodily integrity. Try to justify the ethics of your actions now.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:10 PM
6

Because you're in denial about the simple fact that circumcision has NO medical purpose in the immense majority of cases, and it is destructive, so it is mutilation.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:05 PM
6

What does genital mutilation have to do with a safe and effective medical treatment?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:03 PM
2

Since actual need for circumcision is absurdly rare - one in sixteen thousand, smaller than the probability of dying in consequence of circumcision - I assure you every one you did was needless. Now try again.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:00 PM
6

If "he doesn't remember it" is a valid justification, then rape with roofies should be legal.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:54 PM
3

You should totally do female circumcisions! You know, to provide a space where they can be done safely so that they don't have to be done in a back alley.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:53 PM
5

In countries where female circumcision is popular, doctors do it, giving the same "health benefit" bullshit justifications. You can promptly see the falsehood of that, yet you will fail to identify the falsehood of what you've been taught.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:51 PM
2

Then, would you kindly explain the ethics of performing amputations without a medical purpose on people who have never consented to it. And before you say their parents did authorize it, please tell us what other body parts you are allowed to amputate on the same grounds. It's not medicine. It's cargo cult science performing a blood ritual.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:44 PM
2

To claim a procedure brings benefits, even though it does not. Is this not medical fraud? Also: sexual assault, torture, mayhem, and organ theft.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 10:03 AM
5

How does it feel to spend a fortune to become a quack?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 09:39 AM
3

You are a fraud and a scoundrel. You have no ethics.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 09:10 AM
8

Back in the Roman Empire, under Hadrian, you would get the death penalty for even one. Stern but fair.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 09:07 AM
3

No compromise - I demand a total ban.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 10:44 PM
2

Circumcision of a non-consenting person, without a pressing medical need (which is tremendously rare), is just a package of sexual assault, torture, and mayhem.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 07:33 AM
2

Call the police, I've just committed mass murder (in a video game).
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:35 AM
4

Everything you listed is claimed but false or misleading.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 04:37 AM
4

I believe a solution is to make the kid decide at 18 years old if not earlier. Authoritarian logic: the immense majority will choose not to, therefore they can't be allowed to choose. Seriously, I saw someone use this argument once.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 04:35 AM
0

And just how acceptable would this be in any western society?
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:52 PM
3

Yes. Circumcision is a meme, in the proper sense of the word. People would rather impose this harm upon the next generation than admit that their own generation was duped.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:08 PM
2

As Wellhausen explained, circumcision is not even mentioned in the original version of the Pentateuch. It was only added around 500BC, along with a load of taboos and ritual nonsense, as a power grab by the priestly class.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:04 PM
2

Do I have the right to ask a woman to get circumcised?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:05 PM
0

How can you evaluate something you never had a chance to use?
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:48 AM
2

By the dictionary's definition, circumcision totally is mutilation.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 12:41 AM
0

How can you even evaluate its importante?
/r/MensRights02/10/16 12:40 AM
1

Ditto. Enjoy the Stockholm syndrome.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:38 PM
1

So says the fuckwit who believes it's acceptable to perform an irreversible body modification on someone who has never consented to it.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:17 PM
1

There is no greater hypocrite than one who brands a child like cattle, and then defends it as "freedom of religion". What about the child's freedom? What about his right to not be branded a follower of a religion he never chose?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 04:16 PM
1

What about "Animal Farm" equality?
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:38 PM
1

If you believe in equality, you're an MRA.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:37 PM
2

The male equivalent would be removal of the head of the penis not the foreskin. Which may be less damaging: the glans in fact is much poorer in fine touch nerve ends than the foreskin.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:28 PM
6

Real life numbers show circumcision does nothing to stop HIV. Outside of intentionally biased studies, higher HIV infection rates are usually found among circumcised men.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:25 PM
7

And MGM is a religion based act that is meant to eliminate a man's sexual pleasure.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:23 PM
4

There are other, even more extreme forms of ritual MGM.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:14 PM
1

She's part Asian.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 08:03 PM
46

She speaks as if she, a white woman, knew what was best for me, a woman of color she’s never met. And she had to cram race into it. Of course, when you're lying all the way, might as well double down on it!
/r/MensRights27/06/16 10:44 AM
1

Break up. Better now than realizing too late.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 10:03 AM
4

Don't be silent, debunk it thoroughly.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:23 AM
2

Tell a man to git gud, he will try harder next time. Tell a feminist to git gud, she will cry that challenging gameplay is oppressive.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 02:28 AM
1

I've heard this hypothesis, but it may sound a liiiiitle bit sexist: Women naturally, subconsciously desire to submit to strong men (which explains the popularity of rape fantasies and "50 Shades"). But the feminist religion ideology has shamed western men from playing their natural dominant role. So, in confusion and sexual frustration, women seek kebab to play this role.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 07:06 AM
1

Prepuceplasty, a small cut that does not remove tissue.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:06 AM
1

forever hysterical girlfriend Dump her.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:13 PM
20

As a polite person, I'll let him go first.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:07 AM
1

Seems you don't understand what "therapeutic" means.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:58 PM
1

Jodie Foster Lolwut? Prince wrote that song. And it has nothing to do with that incident.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:47 PM
2

therapeutic Nope. That would be the case if, for example, it was done to fix a phimosis (and even then it's still not the right procedure in most cases, since there are more conservative options to try first).
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:40 PM
2

It means your parents have betrayed their faith.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:13 PM
7

Doing so, they go against the instructions of the Apostle Paul. It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery. Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:05 PM
4

So says the Catechism of the Catholic Church: Except when performed for strictly therapeutic medical reasons, directly intended amputations, mutilations, and sterilizations performed on innocent persons are against the moral law.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:56 PM
2

I just tell it like it is.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 03:25 PM
4

Then you support the torture, rape, and crippling of boys.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 02:10 PM
1

An accusation of rape could ruin the accused's life. Therefore, an accusation of rape proven false should ruin the accuser's life. It's only fair. Several years in jail at least.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:05 AM
1

If it was randomized for every session, I'd understand, but making it permanent? That's just stupid.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:35 PM
3

A certain Jake Waskett pretty much "owns" that article. He's not a doctor or anything, just a circumcision fetishist.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:21 PM
7

It seems as if both groups want to help people And that's your mistake. Feminism is an anti-masculine hate movement.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:40 PM
4

Feminism is not a hate group because there is not a specific group called "feminism". Duh. It is a hate ideology.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:03 PM
2

After The Matrix Revolutions, it's not like I expected anything good from them anyway.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 05:00 PM
1

Well, isn't clitoridectomy completely banned?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:58 AM
-3

Follow the American tradition: sue the panties off them!
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:00 PM
4

Won't be long until the "fatally" part becomes literal.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:04 AM
99

Someone once pointed this: Men admire ass-kicking female characters - Bayonetta, Lara Croft, Faith Connors, Mai Shiranui, Claire Redfield, Chell, Shantae, Sash Lilac, Konoko, Ellen Ripley, Beatrix Kiddo, Buffy Summers, Motoko Kusanagi, Yohko Mano, Master Tigress... hell, even the characters from goddamn My Little Pony count as strong. Women project themselves into helpless bland female characters - Bella Swan, Ana Steele, any protagonist from those trashy romance novels. They may claim they want…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:43 AM
1

There was no intent to hurt or damage me. Yes, there was: "medical" circumcision was introduced during a Victorian era moral panic to make "self-abuse" more difficult. It was always meant to reduce sexual pleasure. This surgery did not spoil the attractiveness of my dick By the classical (Greek/Roman) standard of beauty, circumcision was so abominable, a cut man was not far from an eunuch. Hell, even the Bible compares it to a partial emasculation (Gal. 5:12).
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:33 AM
1

Is this solid enough data for you?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:25 AM
2

Sickens me how the media put words in his mouth. He said illegal immigrants tend to be violent criminals - which is statistically correct - so they twisted it to "ebil rayciss Trump says all Mexicans are violent criminals".
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:23 PM
1

What if he said "I hate poor people"?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:16 PM
3

DEFINITION: mutilation is an act of physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of a living body. FACT: circumcision does that. LOGICAL CONCLUSION: circumcision is mutilation.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:12 PM
2

Depends on the kind. The most common kind is less destructive than male circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:09 PM
2

Way more likely than you think.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 07:04 PM
4

Reduced sexual pleasure. Much greater chance of erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, and painful intercourse. Possible total loss of sensation on the penis. Possible emasculation. Possible death by infection or blood loss.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 06:48 PM
7

Then you get it because you want to get it and accept the consequences. That's your choice. But doing it to a child takes away someone's choice.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 06:41 PM
7

How about never going through it? Actual need for circumcision is absurdly rare.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 06:34 PM
5

From the very start: Erin Pizzey, who founded the first women's shelter in 1971, found that most of those women were also abusers - domestic violence is usually mutual - and tried to create a shelter for men. The feminist movement immediately turned against her, because the women-are-victims narrative means easy money.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:39 PM
2

Isn't that some Orthodox Jew thing?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 01:11 AM
19

It's a mythical excuse to blame men for everything that's bad in the world. Like "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:41 PM
4

Don't you count multi-part movies as one? For example, Lord of the Rings is a single, 11-hour-long movie.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 07:48 AM
1

Though, for some reason, and this had me laughing out loud, George Eliot was accidentally included on the women’s list. Is he implying that George Eliot was not a woman?
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:48 PM
2

That. And also, I think all people need some peer pressure to function. Once in a while, everyone who falls short of perfect Mister Rogers standards of ethical behavior will need to hear "your behavior is shit". But with feminism, anyone who criticizes a woman's behavior is oppressive, and now we have a generation of women who grew up without anyone telling them not to be assholes.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:28 AM
4

Black people, what would it take for you to be at peace with the klan?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:30 AM
3

If the victim is a male, they mock him.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:20 AM
4

Patriarchy, gotta love that word. "There's something wrong with the world and men are to blame."
/r/MensRights21/02/16 03:06 AM
0

A female president, why not? Look at the shining examples of Angela Merkel, Cristina Kirchner, Dilma Rousseff...
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:34 AM
3

No, he's just a sick fuck.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:56 PM
3

One can be a fucking idiot without being a complete monster. Morris is a complete monster.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:47 PM
7

I recall someone explained why child-rearing duties in fact gave women tremendous power over society... damn, I wish I had saved that.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 07:31 AM
65

Quite the animalistic view. Now imagine the shitstorm if someone said women are made to stay at home and make babies.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 08:45 PM
6

That is muscle strain caused by repetitive shaking of one's head in disbelief.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 02:03 AM
2

Don't forget Bell Labs / Lucent.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 09:29 PM
1

Here's a guess: women some people have a submissive personality, and feminism modern society derides them if they follow this natural inclination. So they seek a group where that sort of behavior is appreciated.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 06:55 AM
3

Or they are brainwashed by ideology. It is Commiefornia, after all!
/r/MensRights10/02/16 06:48 AM
19

How does this make any sense at all? It doesn't.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 06:43 AM
1

Except the headline is inflammatory and misleading when you actually read Roosh's post. His point is that, depending on the context, "no" does not mean a revoking of consent. Words are a small part of communication - things like tone and body language are also crucial.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:09 AM
7

Whom would she defy, then?
/r/MensRights09/02/16 06:58 AM
1

Should klansmen be barred from teaching or raising a family?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:28 PM
4

It's clearly an agent provocateur to make us look bad.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:25 PM
11

Roosh supports rape just as Jonathan Swift supports cannibalism. It's called satire.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 03:53 AM
2

And of course, bitch locked the comments when they didn't match The Narrative™.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:33 AM
3

Look into Erin Pizzey. Back in the 70s, she founded the first shelter for abused women, but found that most of her guests were equally or more abusive to their partners. So she tried to create a shelter for abused men, and the feminist movement hounded on her for that.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:53 AM
2

Poe's law strikes again!
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:52 PM
1

This is bait.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:47 PM
6

Sure, do a petition.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:46 PM
3

I heard that many men report an increase of sensation when they restore, probably because it provides some protection to the glans. I'm not sure whether I should recommend that, or wait for Foregen.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:28 AM
3

Super Mario Sisters? You mean, The Great Giana Sisters?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:51 PM
13

Alcohol is not the problem, but the kebab. The solution is to remove kebab.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 08:35 PM
0

If only they made some decent hardware! But as long as they only produce desktops with laptop-grade GPUs (not counting the crazy expensive Pro), I can't consider getting a Mac again.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 09:49 AM
3

Check the 'formatting help' before posting, your text is messed up.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:51 PM
1

Anita's example of positive female protagonist is the Scythian from Sword & Sworcery EP. That is, a character completely devoid of visually discernible feminine features. Is that bitch crazy or what?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 10:43 AM
1

My only opinion about Peppa Pig is: that damn show may have the ugliest character design ever! Everything about it looks repulsive. I used to think Cobi was ugly, but it looks fantastic in comparison.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:47 AM
9

That depends. Say, is it a lacrosse team?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:13 PM
41

The actual rape culture, don't expect feminists to say a thing about it.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:19 AM
25

Of course they are more collegial, since modern education was made intentionally hostile to men.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:02 AM
3

It takes two to tango.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:59 AM
4

It can be a life-or-death procedure... as it can cause death by blood loss or infection.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:59 PM
169

TIL body language does not exist.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 05:30 PM
0

Make all bathrooms unisex, problem solved.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:45 PM
3

Men can be feminists, just as blacks be klansmen.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 06:32 PM
1

How does it feel to contradict reality?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:14 AM
12

Nikolaos of Myra, the 4th century Byzantine saint upon whom the legend is based, happened to have a penis.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:17 AM
2

To hell with Tebow, that son of a bitch promotes male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:27 AM
5

You have a moonface fetish?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:23 PM
1

Contact the Lego Group, they won't like seeing their toys being used as part of a hate campaign.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 03:43 AM
2

"If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts." - Camille Paglia
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:28 PM
1

A reminder of who Carly Fiorina truly is: "As CEO, she lobbied for a tax holiday on corporate profits to create jobs. Instead, the money was used to buy back stock while HP fired 14,500 workers." (The Daily Beast) "Her big decision was acquiring rival Compaq, a move that became to her what the Iraq War was to George W. Bush: a dismal failure from which she apparently learned nothing." (Chicago Tribune) "Whatever the exact extent of Fiorina’s role, Lucent was soon sucked in deep, making big loans…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:46 PM
1

I'd have just answered: 'hell no, modern feminism is an anti-masculine hate movement.'
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:54 PM
1

Still unfair. He has done literally nothing that any sensible person would see as improper.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:51 AM
0

I don't really mind that she gets away. I mind the double standard that would destroy a male in a similar situation.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:35 PM
8

This bullshit gets an article, while the one on "cultural marxism" gets wiped from existence. What the fuck is going on with Wikipedia?
/r/MensRights03/10/15 06:36 PM
2

If masculinity is so fragile, how come patriarchy is so powerful? Gotcha, feminuts!
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:54 PM
2

Tell me how THIS is a "small part". [pic nsfw]
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:25 AM
3

Just glad I'm healthy. Other than the fact that you lack a piece of your genitals...
/r/MensRights14/09/15 03:34 AM
2

Has your dad ever actually read the goddamn Bible?! "Watch out for those dogs, those evildoers, those mutilators of the flesh." -- Philippians 3:2 "For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake." -- Titus 1:10-11 "Now therefore why are you putting God to the test by placing on the neck of the disciples a yoke that neither our ancest…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 03:22 AM
5

if ... there is no downside to it then why not. Severely reduced sexual sensation. Hugely increased chance of impotence and painful intercourse. To name a few. A quick google search (looked at the top 3-4 results) says that 77% of males are circumcised. More like the other way around. They only remove a small, practically useless part of it Half of the penile surface, including the most sexually sensitive part. Im not a religious person, but my parents (along with most of the world) are and I re…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:57 AM
5

Also, there is an equal reason for and against circumcision Other than exceedingly rare cases of need, there is no reason for circumcision. I'd rather live my whole life without foreskin than switch when I'm 18. The immense majority of mankind never gets a circumcision, period. You make this seem like we are cutting off people's dicks for no reason That's exactly what it is. I guess every parent should be jailed or killed based on your logic. That was the law in the Roman Empire under Hadrian. I…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:18 AM
4

Brian Morris is not a human being. He is a dick shark, a very dangerous sea sex predator. He can smell the blood of circumcision wounds from long distances, and reacts by swimming quickly to strike with bullshit studies pulled from his own ass.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 12:58 AM
7

So anything goes if the victim has no memory? brb, going to buy roofies...
/r/MensRights14/09/15 12:36 AM
10

Feminism is for female equality, just as the Klan is for white equality.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 01:44 AM
0

"Jew" is not a race, despite their own claims.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:19 PM
11

Math is pointless when you're dealing with feels instead of reals.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 01:30 AM
14

Doing something nice for your significant other? That's soooo demeaning!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:27 AM
4

Didn't the Venona papers prove that Joe McCarthy was essentially right?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:23 PM
1

As time went by, Paul became more and more vehement against circumcision, and ultimately called its supporters dogs, sexual perverts, mutilators, and swindlers. http://www.cirp.org/pages/cultural/glass1/
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:44 PM
3

Then cut that bitch from your circle of friendships entirely.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:16 AM
1

A possible factor: circumcision trauma is linked to autism.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 08:51 PM
19

Fact: the foreskin is about half of the penile surface.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:16 AM
6

"Realistic", because fit women don't exist.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 02:26 AM
11

And you bet they'll cry oppression if someone makes a white-only or male-only space.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 08:00 AM
5

Modern feminism is an anti-masculine, radical left-wing hate movement. Don't expect anything else from them.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 07:26 PM
22

I would reply: 'And somehow women are SHOCKED by the fact that men are realizing this is a terrible deal and deciding to go their own way.'
/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:33 PM
3

Should have called back then. And if your current girl won't believe you, dump her. Can't live with someone who doesn't trust you.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:34 AM
4

Weapons are property. Logically, it's saying women should become chattel.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:16 PM
5

This reminds me of a scene from a politically correct James Bond satire that MAD published in 95. Those nutjobs want to make sex as convoluted and unexciting as the joke version of it.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 06:15 PM
21

Which is also why they hate porn and prostitutes.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 09:13 PM
20

If that is so, why are feminists so incensed by MGTOW?
/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:20 PM
3

Looking at it flaccid, it looks almost normal. It was not very tight, and at least I still have the frenulum.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 10:30 PM
5

Already did. It's the only thing keeping me moderately sane.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:31 PM
3

Yes, he said it was pretty much a certainty I'd at least get him a severe reprimand from the local medical board. However, my family was in a clusterfuck of legal, financial, and health troubles at the time, so I'd have no support from them for this fight. So I had to give up.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:33 PM
7

I'm 35, must have been a decade ago or so.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:45 AM
10

Medical error. Doctor never said it'd be a circumcision, and described it in a manner that made me believe it'd be a prepuceplasty. "It's just a little cut", he said. He also said steroid creams just don't work, which is also a lie. So essentially he ruined my life. Not only the reduced sensation, and worse, the phantom pain, but worst of all, the shame of having this incomplete, scarred member. Self-esteem went downhill fast.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:40 AM
2

"Male feminist" is as dumb as "black klansman". Why join a movement that's devoted to oppressing you?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:28 AM
5

I am mutilated. To refrain from using that word would be a denial of the truth.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:26 AM
11

I can vouch: there's a massive loss of sensation, yes.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:21 AM
7

Even IF circumcision didn't cause negative effects (it does), and IF it protected against diseases (it doesn't), it would still be absolutely immoral to perform body modifications on someone who has never consented to it, except in cases of pressing medical need.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:26 AM
14

That's why feminists hate porno and prostitution: competition drives prices down!
/r/MensRights25/05/15 07:29 PM
8

I would molotov the fuck out of the judge's house if I lived there.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:08 AM
1

False, false, false -- real life numbers, outside of intentionally flawed studies, show circumcision provides no protection against STDs.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:21 PM
2

Actually, comparing the damage of the most common forms of male and female genital cutting, by the area of destroyed erogenous tissue, one can see that males have it worse.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:20 PM
1

The only reasonable solution is for him to change his mind. Circumcision is an ABSOLUTE NO. If you can't make him change his mind, it's best to dump him.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:53 PM
0

You will eventually have to choose between your husband's feelings and your child's well-being. Save yourself the headache, break up now or regret later.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:52 PM
1

My take is... ever heard of how some dolts decided that "brainstorm" was offensive to people with epilepsy, even though no one who actually has epilepsy had ever complained about that word? It's the same thing, some dolts looking for excuses to be offended. It's like a fetish for them.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:34 PM
3

Let me tell you a story. A fable, in fact, by the legendary Greek storyteller Aesop. It happened that a Fox caught its tail in a trap, and in struggling to release himself lost all of it but the stump. At first he was ashamed to show himself among his fellow foxes. But at last he determined to put a bolder face upon his misfortune, and summoned all the foxes to a general meeting to consider a proposal which he had to place before them. When they had assembled together the Fox proposed that they …
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:36 PM
1

Except that's all bullshit. Circumcision was meant to reduce sexual sensation, because back in the prudish Victorian age, "self-abuse" and "excessive lust" were believed to cause all sorts of problems. Every "benefit" since then is an ex post facto excuse to keep the easy money rolling in.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:28 PM
1

So you intend to mutilate your child for nothing.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:21 PM
4

If it means amputating a part of his genitals, yes, it's downright evil! Also, circumcision rates in US have fallen a lot, and in a few decades cut men will likely be a minority.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:16 PM
7

Do you realize how pathetic you sound? "Right or wrong, we'll do whatever everyone else does!"
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:07 PM
7

And here's a perfect example of cultural myopia.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:53 PM
3

Infection or blood loss.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:51 PM
7

If you were a circumcised woman living in Africa, you'd have a hard time finding a woman upset about her circumcision.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:22 PM
3

I heard Jon Krakauer plotted 9/11. No, I don't have any evidence, but it's a rumor now, so send him to Gitmo!
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:34 PM
2

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets. But enough talk, have at you!
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:15 PM
12

If feminism was ever about correcting injustices, it has long ceased to be. It is now a hate movement, fully devoted to berate, degrade, and demonize all things masculine.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:08 PM
8

Feminist logic: feels over reals. Nothing new here.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:51 PM
36

Next: sue the shit out of the scamming therapist.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:09 AM
4

Women in Africa think their mutilated vulvas look fine and dandy too.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:31 AM
4

The foreskin's ridged band is, along with the frenulum, the most sexually sensitive area of man's body. It's a world of difference. Heck, even the Bible calls circumcision a partial emasculation.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 05:02 PM
-2

I'm ok with that, as long as the standard is the same for everyone.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:08 PM
3

It sounds idiotic until you understand the way an SJW's brain works. They don't see people as people, only as allies or enemies in the holy war against the mythical monster of patriarchy. It's the same sort of mindset of a radical communist or a religious fanatic.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:25 AM
8

Here's a tip: lurk moar. This means: rather than ask, just read with an open mind what men post here, and try to understand what they're talking about. You'll see that men really have it worse in many respects, and modern feminism is actually a hateful ideology that seeks to hurt men rather than the purported goal of correcting injustices against women.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:45 PM
0

There are views that I don't agree with, and if I say my opinion, we would get in an argument. I think this bit is the most telling. Respect has to go both ways and it does not sound like she's doing her part.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:21 AM
0

I've read two of her books: The Chalice and The Blade: Our History, Our Future and Sacred Pleasure: Sex, Myth, and the Politics of the Body. I guess her ideas lean a bit to the "new age" side, but she's definitely egalitarian and sex-positive.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:49 PM
0

There's also Riane Eisler.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:30 AM
1

Anita Sarkeesian said something similar...
/r/MensRights19/04/15 12:04 AM
23

Well, the idea of a sex offender registry is insane in the first place. Once you're released, you should get a clean slate.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:43 PM
8

Here in Brazil we have a female president. We hate her now.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:34 PM
25

"Feminism for men" is like "KKK for negros". Why would you follow an ideology that has no concern or respect for your dignity and in fact hates you?
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:51 PM
2

I was going to post a witty comment there, but you have to be registered with Facebook or Google+. Fuck that shit.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:31 AM
3

You can't say anything bad about Islam because muslims are "people of color" therefore "oppressed".
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:24 PM
15

Except that is incorrect. The original purpose of circumcision was to reduce man's sexual pleasure. If anything, given the most common form of male and female circumcision, you can assume male circumcision is more destructive, since the ridged band concentrates most of man's erogenous nerve ends.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 11:00 AM
15

It's as much "a matter of personal views" as clitoridectomy.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:31 AM
6

How about you go talk to her sister and try to talk her out of it?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:21 AM
9

The (correct) implication that her sister plans to do something absolutely immoral, maybe.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:20 AM
44

Tell her to get circumcised.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:37 AM
18

This. Marry, work hard, be a good cog in the machine. [ insert lehappymerchant.jpg here ]
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:34 AM
2

Imagine if I threatened to use violence against a woman for being bad at vidya!
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:32 PM
7

Because success stories don't fit their narrative. Feminists want to paint themselves as oppressed. They want to be the gatekeepers of female success. Any woman outside of their clique, who succeeds by her own merits, is not worth attention.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:31 PM
2

Still, she deceived you. That has to be a crime.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:43 PM
2

Can't you sue the bitch for fraud?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:33 PM
4

What's ideology got to do with it? Their source is the DHS Program, the data is freely available, check it yourself. If circumcision really had any protective effect, it would show consistently. It simply does not. And even if it did, that would still not justify infant circumcision. It is absolutely unethical to perform surgery on a person who has not consented to it, except in cases of pressing medical need. And it is also unethical, obviously, to promote a mostly useless and potentially cripp…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:51 PM
3

Check the real life numbers for various African countries. In many of them, HIV rates are higher among circumcised men. Where is the magical protection, huh? It's bullshit!
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:07 AM
2

Camden, NJ, is the most dangerous city in the USA: you have a 1 in 39 chance of becoming a victim of a violent crime. To believe the "1 in 5" claim, you would have to accept the ludicrous idea that colleges are somehow far more dangerous places than the most dangerous city in the USA.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:24 PM
2

I'd still call Maimonides a sick son of a bitch for that reason.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 05:25 AM
11

Just name feminism a disease and do the same.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:44 AM
4

But everything you said is false. The rate of complications is 100% (the complication being a lack of complete genitals), the sexual negative effects can be downright crippling, ditto about the psychological effects, and real life numbers (outside of obviously flawed pseudo-scientific studies) show that circumcision simply does not help prevent HIV infections in the first goddamn place.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:09 AM
5

How does that help men? By STOPPING the cycle of abuse. More people aware = fewer people circumcising their children. Hopefully, it will get to the point it is so widely rejected that it finally gets completely outlawed.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:45 AM
5

The very goal of circumcision is to sexually cripple man. The extent of the crippling is all that varies.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:37 PM
2

Because otherwise they might get triggered.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:04 AM
1

To be fair... back in the 70s, there was this feminist & lesbian music label, Olivia Records, whose acts were actually decent. For just one example, this song is not bad, it's even quite whimsical.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 02:05 AM
14

I'm saying: presentation matters too.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:07 PM
10

Man, that cover is awful. With a more sober picture, maybe the book would be taken more seriously.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 12:51 PM
1

It's cruelty for a child to be raised by two men. Just imagine, being subjected to twice the dad jokes!
/r/MensRights18/01/15 07:40 AM
6

Circumcision was already strongly linked with alexithymia and erectile dysfunction. But hey, it's "cleaner" and "traditional". ¬_¬
/r/MensRights17/01/15 11:25 AM
1

It's not just morally equivalent. The physical damage is also equivalent. And indeed, comparing the most common form of each, the damage is worse for males.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:15 PM
2

The guy is actually kinda good-looking...
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:28 AM
2

A prepuceplasty would fix phimosis without actually removing any tissue.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 10:02 PM
4

Maybe one out of every sixteen thousand men ever actually need one.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 10:01 PM
9

Male circumcision is a men's rights issue, just as female circumcision is a woman's rights issue. Or, instead: both are a human rights issue.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 10:00 PM
12

Reminds me of a joke. They asked an old couple how they had remained married for a lifetime. "Well, you know how it was back then: when something wasn't working, you'd fix it, not throw it away."
/r/MensRights31/12/14 09:47 PM
3

Why can't Jewish males just make the decision for themselves when they're old enough? Because Gee-Dee established the covenant... oh wait, because the Torah was edited around 500 B.C. to include the claim that god demanded them to do it to babies before they are old enough to say no.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:57 AM
3

Ya know, I once read some excerpts from a book about kashrut, written by a rabbi. He said its true purpose was to keep Jews from eating together with gentiles. Because, well... if they ate together, they would get too friendly, and intermarriage could occur, Gee-Dee forbid! A nazi would have to try real hard to write anything more damning about Jews than that rabbi did.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:47 AM
6

Do we make an exception for women who want to be clitoridectomized for religious reasons?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:40 AM
9

Well, how bluntly can I put this? Male circumcision and female circumcision are the same thing. If there is a difference in the extent of the harm, that is minutiae. There is zero moral difference between the two acts. Circumcision is absolutely, irredeemably evil. It can not be allowed in any civilized society, just as we no longer accept trial by ordeal or human sacrifice. And if you find my words offensive, consider this: we are talking about an extreme, defacing, and potentially crippling bo…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:38 AM
2

Feminism can mean different things; what we (and most people nowadays) understand from the word is the sickest, loudest, and most popular side of the movement. Just lurk around this sub. Sure, some men are unreasonably angry; but when you pay attention, you can understand what drives them into that state. From the newest articles right now, some ways men get short-changed: It's easy, and extremely common, for women to falsely accuse a man of rape. Rape is legally defined in a way that only a man…
/r/MensRights18/12/14 09:27 AM
1

No taxation, no representation: you women lose the right to vote. Deal?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:38 AM
2

It starts with anti-Gamergate bullshit. Fuck that.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 07:34 AM
3

Damnit, people, stop linking to mobile versions of sites. Most of us are on desktop.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 10:34 PM
1

Oh, this one is good for historical and cultural perspective: a very notable Jewish philosopher argued that circumcision is good because it makes sex worse.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:47 AM
1

If it argues for circumcision, it is not reputable. If it was, it automatically ceases to be.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:45 AM
7

Hey, do you know why African men need the increased stimulus? Because circumcision has made their members less sensitive in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:35 AM
3

You tried to debate something rationally with a feminist. That's what you did wrong.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 05:06 AM
1

Well, if the father really plays something as idiotic as "nipple cripple" with his son, he's fucked up in the head.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:07 AM
6

No surprise at all. It is usually women who oppress women. For instance, it is usually women who mutilate girls' genitals (just as it is usually men who mutilate boys' genitals).
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:30 AM
1

But MGM does not have any benefits, and it usually is as destructive as FGM or more (people think of the more extreme FGM as the most common form, which is not true).
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter