~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BasedI think we can all agree that the courts favor the mother. Some of the reason for that (not that I think this bias is justifiable) is because mothers historically spend more time raising the kids anyway. This study shows the differences: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/chapter-4-how-mothers-and-fathers-spend-their-time/ But fathers are spending more time than they used to, so the courts should look more closely at each situation. There's no reason why fathers who have alread… | /r/AntiFeminists | 13/05/21 12:06 AM |
| 1 | BasedYes, I've heard stories where the court has a crazy bias towards mothers, and sometimes it can be like pulling teeth to pry custody away from an abusive mother, just because "she's the mother." I don't know all the details of this poor child's story, but clearly, her son should have NEVER been in her custody: https://abc7.com/anthony-avalos-child-abuse-torture-lancaster-case/10600503/ But I've also heard antecdotal stories from divorce lawyers (some lawyers who are sympathetic towards fathers) t… | /r/AntiFeminists | 12/05/21 09:07 PM |
| 1 | BasedThe formatting isn't the issue here, my dude. | /r/AntiFeminists | 12/05/21 06:03 AM |
| 1 | BasedJust saving this for context again. I can tell you don't "see" what I'm getting at in your current mental state, but damn. Oh was I too obvious there with what I did with you there at the end?My bad.Here is a bit of your pre-edit text from my email for sake of context about how ill YOU are mentally, showing your lack of education in art as well.Watch what I did here."Was about 2 weeks of painting total. That's an awfully long time to do a single painting. Especially if you aren't having to wai… | /r/AntiFeminists | 12/05/21 06:01 AM |
| 1 | BasedAlmost every story I hear (from friends, friends of friends) is that they divorce, he quits his good-paying job to avoid paying childcare or otherwise doesn't pay child support, and she struggles to make ends meet. Clearly, there are also anecdotal stories that show the opposite—that she was cheating all the time and takes him to the cleaners. Or, the court is grossly unfair and demands he give some outrageously high amount of his earnings for child support and/or alimony. I don't doubt that's a… | /r/AntiFeminists | 12/05/21 12:35 AM |
| 1 | BasedEdit: I had posted something else, but upon further reflection it seems like this discussion went from snark and fun and games to you going over the bend. Some of the things you wrote just don't seem to be coming from a mentally healthy place. (I'm not talking about your insults towards me, which are the same old same old, but specifically the denigrating comments about art and in particular this recently departed artist.) I just don't get what prompted you to write that. Seriously. Wow. I'm don… | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 10:35 PM |
| 1 | BasedIt's embarrassing that you assume these masters write fiction. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 05:58 PM |
| 1 | BasedThese things happen, sure. And it's tragic when they happen. But they are not the norm. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 05:55 PM |
| 1 | BasedLOL. You say "good luck" writing with my "shit book" and you have no idea what it is. And I'm not writing it, if you cared to comprehend what I actually said before. I'll add the books of Virgil Elliot, Andrew Loomis, Anthony Ryder, James Gurney. Excellent books, very educational, but quite demanding, though. Since you haven't heard of Schmid I'm going to assume you know little about the others (except for one name perhaps?) but in your ignorance, you're still sooooo sure you're on a superior pl… | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 07:30 AM |
| 1 | BasedLol, I'm not a gamer, or angry, or an athiest. Don't believe you. Good luck writing with your shit book. What "shit book" are you talking about? Richard Schmid's book? You couldn't even Google him? | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 07:13 AM |
| 1 | BasedMagic is the one game so complex that no supercomputer packed with AI can play. You don't seem to understand much about the world at all. Richard Schmid just died. Google him. That's my real world. I need to finish his book. Who has time for Magic. I should be reading his book now, as a matter of fact. I just ... can't. Gamer, porn user, angry atheist. Intellectually superior because they play a game. No, I just can't. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 07:05 AM |
| 1 | BasedGamer, angry atheist, porn fan. Fancies himself an intellectual. Uses "your" instead of "you're." It's too much. It's too much. It keeps on getting better and better. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:47 AM |
| 1 | BasedGamer, porn, angry atheist. Fancies himself as an intellectual. The big trifecta of fun. Please, tell me you're a troofer or a furry or something as well. It would just be too perfect. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:42 AM |
| 1 | BasedI get you have difficulty believing not everyones happiness has to do with women. LOL wow, projecting. Look, I've been telling you to stick with your porn and sex dolls. Please. Women around the world will be grateful. I can be happy while thinking your a POS. CRAZY HUH? "You're." I just can't let that one go. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:40 AM |
| 1 | BasedI figure you probably don't play games that require you to be intellectually stimulated tho. I should have known. A gamer and into porn. LOL! | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:33 AM |
| 1 | BasedOh no! You view me in a negative light? Oh no! Whatever will I do? lol. "Disgust"? Of course, unhappy, as I've been saying. So you admit it. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:32 AM |
| 1 | BasedActually I'm playing a game :) It's only after it's obvious that I'm having a blast that you start claiming to be "playing a game." Not buying it. You're clearly wound too tight for that. Lighten up Francis. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:28 AM |
| 1 | BasedPeople aren't magically unhappy because they dislike you and your opinion. But you are. You are getting increasingly agitated. Upping the ante. Now all of a sudden I belong to a "cult"! LOL! Keep trying, but try to be more creative next time, will you? | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:26 AM |
| 1 | BasedOh my gosh! You just keep going and going and going! It's hilarious! Only one person is having fun right now, and it's not you. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:20 AM |
| 1 | BasedNo, I just reject your notion of knowing everyone in a 10,000 person church My parents, my family, my friends, have all been members of this church for all of our lives. My family and friends moved around a bit to different congregations, many different ones. Unless there's some weird phenomenon where just coincidentally wherever we go, everyone stops divorcing immediately and then starts up frantically divorcing as soon as we leave, I think my estimate of "rare" divorce is accurate. But I don't… | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:19 AM |
| 1 | BasedHow much time you going to waste in church just to fade into nothingness, having wasted so much of your life praising a fictional flying sky-wizard. You keep trying that, and keep going nowhere with it. It's not ruffling my feathers. I just wish you'd come up with something new. "Flying sky-wizard" is so yesterday. Come on. Try "Flying spaghetti monster"? I mean I know it's old, but it would be at least a change. Cuz to be honest, you're getting really stale here with your knee-jerk hyperbole. L… | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:13 AM |
| 1 | BasedThat doesn't exist in the real world. I'm not claiming 95% (but it's pretty high) but you cannot know anything about a church you haven't heard of. That most people haven't heard of. I'm not attempting to convince you (Mr They Must Have a PhD or they're idiots) because you'll continue to stamp your feet and deny, deny, deny, no matter what. All I know is that there are scarce few divorces in my church and people are mostly happy. Wives and contented and devoted and so are husbands. Sorry that th… | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:08 AM |
| 1 | BasedI just detest humans like you who believe myth because it fits the narrative you find convenient so you don't have to question your basis of understanding for reality. Wow, militant and all of that. Really wound tight, you are. You're a barrel of laughs. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:03 AM |
| 1 | BasedIf, for the sake of argument, my church (let's say for the sake of argument there are 10,000 members) has a 95% (for example) success rate of happy marriages, then who gives a crap what your statistics say? You have proven nothing about my specific church of 10,000 people, who are happily having good marriages. But you're still going to huff and puff and insist you know. I'm sure that all the happy couples in my church will crumble and dissolve now that they realize that you've "proven" their su… | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 06:00 AM |
| 1 | BasedOh my gosh, so butthurt because I spoke ill of porn. You're hilarious. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 05:53 AM |
| 1 | BasedYour church is full of people with less functional marriages than even atheist's. Go ahead and tell me the name of MY church and show me the statistics of MY specific church and prove to me that my church is "full of people" with less functional marriages. Tell me which church I belong to and then give me the stats. You don't know my church, but you just know you can prove this? You can read minds, is that it? And no, I'm not going to tell you the name of my church. It's small and regional and t… | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 05:52 AM |
| 1 | BasedThere are plenty of other articles available, but you'll certainly dismiss them all, preferring the narrative that all divorced women are living high, and are gold-digging harpies. By all means, keep drinking that manosphere Kool-Aid. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/21 04:58 AM |
| 1 | BasedThe fallacy you are operating on here assumes porn makes someone 'not a decent person'. Please quote the post where I said all consumers of porn are not decent people. They can be bad people, but people are complicated and nuanced. However, porn-addled brains tend to trigger divorce (along with other issues) and studies bear this out. (Which you will promptly ignore and wave away, obviously, because reasons!) Sorry, I'm not bitching about women at all. LOL. Sure buddy, sure... And sure, you said… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 11:28 PM |
| 1 | BasedI clearly said that one doesn't have to be religious to have marital harmony (remember where I just wrote that?). I also said that the common denominator is being a decent person. Did you even digest that little nugget? My takeaway from this is: Men who are decent people have a higher chance of having devoted, doting, loyal, adoring wives. Clearly, many men in my church are like that and aren't blathering on about the virtues of porn because the women are so unbearable to deal with, lol. I grew … | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 11:08 PM |
| 1 | BasedLOL. Did you stutter? It's funny, I'm thinking about the marriages I see in my church. Divorce is very uncommon. The wives adore their husbands and dote on them. But then again, the husbands are decent people who have earned this devotion. They aren't porn-addled either. I think the common denominator is they are "decent people." I don't think someone has to be religious in order to attain this sort of marital harmony, but they do have to be a decent person. | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 09:35 PM |
| 1 | BasedYou continually try to call a peer-reviewed medical study written by medical doctors (but oh no! They don't have PhDs! Except one does) as nothing, and written by "idiots" because it doesn't agree with your agenda. You have zero credibility. You won't back down from the "But it's not written by PhDs" trope. You're done. Will she also ignore this link, on that same 'peer reviewed' site about how peer review is worthless? That means your article is "worthless" too. Except, oh wait, it's written by… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 09:17 PM |
| 1 | BasedLol blame the guy, right. In the narrative you favor, it's always blaming the woman, LOL. Of course there are going to be times when the woman is to blame, and other times when that man is to blame. But just because she initiates the divorce, it doesn't mean it's her fault. If he's cheating or abusing her, he may not want her to leave, but her leaving isn't unreasonable, is it? However, if women have more to lose financially in a divorce, and I see no proof that these women have another sugar da… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 07:52 PM |
| 1 | BasedMy NCBI study was done by PhD's. Yours was not. In debate, and I get you are new to this, credibility of sources is everything. NCBI has criteria that need to be fulfilled in order for a document to be published there. The articles need to be peer-reviewed, etc. You are disingenuous when you try to paint the article I pointed to as being written by "idiots." LOL, but it passed muster with the NCBI and the journal where it was originally published: Behavioral Sciences is an international, peer-… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 07:41 PM |
| 1 | BasedI get this is confusing for you. Like the rest of reality is. Wow, you are so butthurt. By the news that porn is commonly thought to be toxic? (And it is, it is.) LOL. And yes, PhD's doing scientific studies are definitely good sources. Where's the proof? That non-PhD is worthless and that PhD is always worth something? You offer no proof. The study I cite is written primarily by medical doctors (one who incidentally also has a PhD), but you want to leave the impression that they "have no backgr… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 07:22 AM |
| 1 | BasedNCBI isn't a government site, and, my NCBI study was authored by PhD's, yours was authored by idiots. It's on a government domain. .gov. NCBI isn't a government site, and, my NCBI study was authored by PhD's, yours was authored by idiots. My goodness, you're becoming unhinged. Now you are shifting goalposts and insisting that only PhDs can be right? LOL. Where's your proof that my cite (on a government site) is written by "idiots"? Scientific proof, please, since you're so bent on that. And plea… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 02:51 AM |
| 1 | BasedLOL, you're desperate to not believe this. BBC isn't good enough, NBC isn't good enough, Time magazine, medical sites, and government studies aren't good enough. Pathetic. | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 02:35 AM |
| 1 | BasedI'm not trying to offend you at all, you are just offended easily, which is why you feel that way. LOL no, I am referencing what you said before: Sorry that probably offends you. I don't care. You know exactly what you're trying to do and you broadcast that earlier. Now you're trying to gaslight me and pretend that this isn't your intent. I'm not buying it. And, as I told you before, I need to respect someone in order to be offended by them, lol. Having boring sex with a woman that doesn't under… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 02:22 AM |
| 1 | BasedYou are just to retarded or lazy to read your own studies all the way through. No, that government study was pretty damning and specific. It's not the only source. You keep on trying so hard to offend me and it's obvious you are frustrated by your failure to do so. You need to calm down. You're now resorting to words like "retarded" (what are you, 12?) and misspelling. Relax. | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 02:12 AM |
| 1 | BasedI get you are sheltered, but most porn doesn't contain that shit. A government study disagrees with you, along with many other links I found. For someone who sets such great stock in science, you're really good at denying it when it suits you. TBH I just find it hilarious that you ignore the hundreds of doctors and studies that contradict your viewpoint, and cling to something that is commonly known as a myth. You try to ignore the parts of these studies which talk about the "variety" (and somet… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 02:05 AM |
| 1 | BasedThe best you've done so far is show there is a link to temporary erectile problems from masturbation to porn. No, it's not masturbation alone. Highlighting the government study: This review also considers evidence that Internet pornography’s unique properties (limitless novelty, potential for easy escalation to more extreme material, video format, etc.) may be potent enough to condition sexual arousal to aspects of Internet pornography use that do not readily transition to real-life partners, su… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 01:22 AM |
| 1 | BasedSo, Time Magazine, a government medical study, and some medical sites aren't good enough? LOL, you're just in denial. https://www.everydayhealth.com/erectile-dysfunction/pornography-habit-is-linked-to-erectile-dysfunction-research-suggests/ Or can we call it good and agree that porn benefits men by removing a womans ability to control their sexuality in a relationship? Or how about these men buy a sex doll? That would sure show those uppity women up, wouldn't it? LOL. Men who think watching porn… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 12:44 AM |
| 1 | BasedLOL. Time Magazine isn't good enough for you? You're just desperate to deny it. I've got no skin in this game, as I used to just shrug my shoulders, thinking that porn was "normal" for the "rest of the world." It wasn't my concern because my potential dating pool is mostly limited to church people, so why should I care? But now after hearing about all the problems men are having with it, I'm like WOW. I understand that this is not comfortable to most men who like to indulge in porn, but it is wh… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 12:31 AM |
| 1 | Basedhttps://www.legalzoom.com/articles/men-v-women-who-does-better-in-a-divorce | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 12:12 AM |
| 1 | BasedYou just want to delude yourself that there is no problem. But there is. Of course there will be some people who will try to deny it, like I'm sure tobacco companies tried to deny the connection between cigarettes and cancer for a long time. Yet here we are. https://time.com/magazine/us/4277492/april-11th-2016-vol-187-no-13-u-s/ "Whitlock, the former sex educator, says she has been surprised by how reluctant her erstwhile colleagues are to speak up about porn. She believes that because sex educa… | /r/AntiFeminists | 10/05/21 12:01 AM |
| 1 | Basedhttps://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324068 That link is about masturbation, not porn. The same site says there's a link between porn and impotence: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/317117#:~:text=The%20use%20of%20pornography%20might,nerves%20require%20more%20physical%20stimulation. Someone else linked to IFS (which blames women having more sexual partners on rising divorce rates) and you aren't wanting to debunk that, just the atlantic link I posted. Also, religion is for weak peo… | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/21 11:50 PM |
| -2 | BasedLOL, you reject The Atantic but you think IFS is free of bias? You reject my source and I reject yours. The fact men use porn as an escape LOL, you think that's what's going on here? Do ten-year-old boys who start watching porn doing so to "escape" women? LOL. Porn is a HUGE problem, the elephant in the room, and some people don't want to address it. You think women should put up with a porn-addicted man with erectile dysfunction? Why are younger men suffering erectile dysfunction? Since porn is… | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/21 11:35 PM |
| -9 | BasedThat is why divorce is initiated 85% by women. No, it's more because these men are making the women miserable, and the women are more willing to take a financial hit than stay with their husbands. The husbands must be pretty bad. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/04/the-divorce-gap/480333/ Look, I'm quite religious and am in favor of chastity in both women and men before marriage. (Emphasis: BOTH men and women. Not just women.) But I think that study you link to (which looks like… | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/21 09:47 PM |
| 4 | BasedI've witnessed women rejecting fuckboys for being fuckboys, and I know I certainly will do that, and the men are all shocked Pikachu faced that they might be rejected for their sexual history lol. The audacity and entitlement... I'm from a sheltered church environment where both women and men don't fuck around. I read sometimes that men who want a "nice" girl should go to a church (like my church) to find a wife. I find that repulsive. Nice church girls are much better off marrying nice church b… | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/21 09:35 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter