TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rogosk Archive

View 1 post and 141 comments by rogosk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
62

rogosk/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:27 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Here's a relevant MRA article about it: http://gynotheory.blogspot.com/2011/02/false-consciousness-kafka-trapping.html
/r/MensRights18/12/11 09:12 AM
3

Avoidant seems really out of place there. Borderline, Narcissistic, Histrionic, etc.. are the harmful ones, but being avoidant is pretty much being a debilitated hermit.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 10:53 AM
9

Reminds me of: "Men who are falsely accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience. They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Those are good questions." Catherine Comins, Vassar College Assistant Dean of Student Life. Time Magazine, June 3, 1991, p. 52.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 10:56 PM
2

Simply crazy.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:34 AM
1

Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:11 AM
8

same old same old
/r/MensRights02/10/11 12:50 AM
1

Honestly I believe this is all a filtering process, a weeding-out of the betas and omegas so they don't have to deal with them, leaving only the alphas still standing in the dating market.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:35 PM
1

Reminds me of Kimmel's statements of wanting men to finally become "fully human" by accepting femininity. Apparently men are sub-human now. He's real popular with feminists these days.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:32 PM
8

Aye, never liked the term.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 08:21 AM
1

The comments are dizzying. All the typical feminist stuff.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 10:33 PM
1

I don't know, but I don't believe it says anything. There can definitely be a lot of misandry because they can externalize their rejection of acting masculine onto cismales, sometimes reminding them of what they used to be like, and that can turn to hatred. They could have also been bullied by cismales for the transwoman's non-masculine gendered behavior as a child, and come to resent them. But there could actually be a lot of anti-feminism just the same, because of a large arm of feminism's rej…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:10 PM
1

All feminists are good, because all bad feminists aren't feminists at all. Very convenient...
/r/MensRights25/07/11 06:23 PM
1

We should be flattered, giving so much attention to lil' old us!
/r/MensRights23/07/11 07:28 AM
2

Revolting. And think of the repercussions it would have on the son, to be lied to for 14 years.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:46 PM
3

Great stuff.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 08:18 PM
1

Yes, it was just satire. I didn't think anyone would take it seriously.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 02:13 AM
-1

Ah, but see, being wealthy and power-hungry are masculine traits, therefore being ruled by plutarchs is patriarchy. Even if they were all women, it's still patriarchy, because they're only imitating men. Even if there was no ruling class at all, if the concept of masculinity itself was important to society in any way, it's still patriarchy. One does not need to be ruled by men to be in a patriarchy - one only needs to be ruled by the idea of men. When that is obliterated, we shall finally have e…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:40 PM
3

Jesus, that's terrible.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:14 AM
3

These articles keep on popping up. Over and over again. I wonder how many people/feminists will still keep their heads in the sand thinking it'll just go away, only popping out to shame and blame the men even further.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:00 AM
2

I don't believe in Patriarchy, just as I don't believe in the Illuminati or Reptilians.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:51 AM
7

Wonderful congregation of people there. Such a good example of modern feminism, isn't it?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 05:46 AM
25

Reminds me of this gem: http://i.imgur.com/qCJTO.png
/r/MensRights03/07/11 04:48 PM
3

Except when you say women are better than men, of course.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 07:48 AM
2

Heck, he even has a beard!
/r/MensRights21/06/11 09:27 PM
4

Man, look at that blogroll. The blog's not terrible but you know where it's coming from.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 08:22 AM
3

I never really like it when I hear all those kinds of "chivalry still exists, we should all just be polite to one another". Obviously we should, but chivalry isn't just another word for being polite. It being a very particular gendered code of relational behavior, with the male doing masculine things for the woman, and the woman reciprocating in a feminine way. If either party does not participate, chivalry does not exist, period. Feminism has killed chivalry because it has shamed men from actin…
/r/MensRights15/06/11 09:04 PM
1

So much desperate MRA mischaracterization recently. Are they getting scared?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 09:55 AM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/lilacluvr/scott-walker-wisconsin-men-badgercare-family-planning_n_870430_90854548.html This comment thread is just painfully bad.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 04:17 AM
3

Always love this guy's articles. He has his next one on his site, http://gynotheory.blogspot.com/
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:17 PM
1

Feminism doesn't even exist without women as the victim. It's why they never acknowledge women's own privledges - if they do, all those countless women's studies professors would be out of a job. Feminism will never liberate women, because it's realized it has far more power in just endlessly playing the victim.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:04 PM
3

Great article, this and the SEALs one has put me in a good mood.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:07 AM
3

I think abortion is too weighted a term. They're always just going to say the "you want to force women to have abortions!!!".
/r/MensRights31/05/11 02:46 AM
4

She wasn't saying that, she was saying the schools fall over themselves to make sure they get opportunities, and thus it's nonsense for feminists to say that the education system discriminates against females.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 01:48 AM
20

Wonderful article. It doesn't really talk anything about the military, but the fanatical feminist institutions in universities like Yale. Very critical of feminism.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 10:04 PM
1

Great article, seems like an interesting book. I didn't even realize Summers wrote the review until the end, ha.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 10:52 AM
1

This is a pretty terrible article with all the "men just see women as objects!!" etc etc, and isn't Kimmel the guy who wrote Guyland? Good to see a lot of sense in the comments, though.
/r/MensRights27/05/11 09:01 AM
3

Very nice article. You can sense the frustration at feminism.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 11:25 PM
8

Terrible to hear. Good to see the anti-circumcision comments, though.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 05:04 AM
6

How is it taking away her rights by not being the father? You're not doing anything to her body or the child, or involving yourself at all in the childbearing process. She's still the mother, the child is still born (if the mother chooses it to be). All you're doing is opting out of the process, giving her complete parental independence.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 02:56 AM
12

Ugh, "Guyland", and more MGTOW shaming. What else is new. I wonder when they'll get the picture.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 01:43 AM
10

I think it's rather funny and clever.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 10:53 PM
7

I wonder how many budding male students seeking to help male's problems get driven out of the field by ravenous feminist professors.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 03:04 AM
7

Ugh, feminist professors have always made me gag. I understand them in useless bullshit like Women's Study's classes, but ones that actually matter? You might as well get a creationist to teach science. inb4 NAFALT
/r/MensRights23/05/11 02:52 AM
1

A nose job is consensual. A circumcision is not. That is really the issue here.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 09:14 PM
3

Who said we wanted to "mend things" with feminists?
/r/MensRights22/05/11 09:06 PM
6

It's an obvious troll and stop responding to it.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 11:45 PM
20

Just as a woman has a right to choose, so, the “family's right to choose” to circumcise their son might be protected by the law, he said. A woman's right to choose what happens to her own body...is equal to a family's right to choose to operate on a male's body. Why gosh, it's so noble if you put it like that! Really, taking away the family's right to circumcise is the same as being anti-choice! “For the secular government to say a religious mandate is illegal is problematic.” Well if it was a r…
/r/MensRights21/05/11 01:02 PM
4

Honestly, compared to many other radical feminist blogs and writings out there, it's very tame. And heck, remember BitingBeaver? But the fight is over on this particular front, let's not give her any more attention. The reaction towards this shows that people are being ever more vocal about the fact that they can clearly see the emperor has no clothes. The desperate NAFALT cries of the scattered remaining feminists trying to maintain their hold on the population that is being increasingly turned…
/r/MensRights21/05/11 12:57 PM
1

Great stuff, love all this guy's articles. http://gynotheory.blogspot.com/
/r/MensRights21/05/11 11:38 AM
1

Amazing that the list had gotten such attention. The whole video is great.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 12:01 AM
1

There are reasonable women dealing with gender issues. Well of course, but we're talking about feminists, not just women as a whole.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 11:39 PM
1

more like the people deciding where our budget goes. Like feminists?
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:39 PM
-1

Really interesting blog. I like Laffable's comment for obvious reasons. I'm also reading all the comments in different british accents..in me head of course.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 11:43 AM
2

You forgot "Be male".
/r/MensRights20/05/11 11:19 AM
13

No you see, that's the whole point. The list is supposed to be impossible for any man to avoid. Thus proving all men are rape supporters, in her mind.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 01:45 AM
2

Feminism cannot paint a world in which females or femininity is not the eternal oppressed class. This is why you hear of some who say "There is no such thing as sexism against men", because for them, it is only a man's femininity that can be discriminated against, and therefore it is still women who are being oppressed. Much like it's Marxist roots, it defines the current capitalist/patriarchal culture with Males as the oppressive bourgeoisie and Females as the oppressed proletariats. It really …
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:11 AM
5

Most radical feminists are simply done with trying to help all of you, which is seen as male-hating. That frustration with men’s unwillingness to act human is the genesis of the comments in other posts that society seems capable of handling a maximum of 30% men before it starts to break down. Gosh guys, we just don't get it. They're just trying to help us!
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:20 PM
1

I think I'm getting dizzy.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:55 AM
2

These same kinds of articles always seem to pop up, don't they.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:05 AM
-2

It's a very silly show and I don't think anybody takes it's portrayal of relationship drama seriously.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 08:54 AM
1

The guy has a good trollgrin.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 08:48 AM
1

Nice article. Liked this comment: The male half of the human equation is holding that pendulum up so you and your sisters can play, Jill. Stop kicking him.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 10:59 PM
32

Not according to feminism, evidently.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 12:19 PM
2

Nice dig at slutwalk and the "slacktivist" type in general.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 08:18 AM
5

Yes. Men are collectively part of masculine culture. And going by feminist dogma, masculine culture = "hyper-masculine" culture = Rape Culture. So by virtue of being a male, you are thereby promoting aggressive male tendencies by association. And everybody knows all male aggression = rape, either literally or metaphorically. Thus, you are promoting Rape Culture. The only cure is baptizing yourself as a feminist, cleansing all your male sins away!
/r/MensRights18/05/11 01:36 AM
0

inb4 "Stop killing your children, women!" government PSAs. Oh wait, that'd be sexist and stuff. Let me change it... "Stop making your wives kill your children, men!". That should be about right.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 01:22 AM
2

You're forgetting that these people don't believe in the concept of an "innocent man" in the first place. Emphasis on man.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:42 PM
3

Loved this bit: “One might think that if sexual assault at Hamilton College is such a problem that bells and air horns are required to awaken the community—a most extraordinary gesture we’d all have to agree—then Hamilton’s admissions office and public relations arm have a duty to alert parents nationwide who might be thinking of sending their daughters here about the severity of the problem,” he wrote.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:36 PM
8

How can anyone not be offended by this? By being a feminist.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:29 PM
2

Well, it wasn't a man, so we'll likely never know her identity.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:19 PM
3

Ugh, the comments there are truly pathetic. I guess people really don't believe in "innocent before proven guilty" at all. I wonder how they'd run a country they were in charge of...
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:17 PM
2

Yeah, manhood academy just likes to spam. Like the guy who constantly spams his shitty youtube video on every MRA comment page on the internet.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:25 AM
1

Yeah, this is a pretty popular one.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:38 AM
18

Males are the only abusers, even when women are. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlFAd4YdQks
/r/MensRights14/05/11 06:49 AM
7

I'm sure it's still the men's fault. It has to be.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 10:47 PM
1

all of blogger crapped out, they lost some posts that might be restored later
/r/MensRights13/05/11 10:40 PM
2

Great article
/r/MensRights13/05/11 04:37 AM
1

Whoever didn't see this coming is dense, and it's only going to get worse. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/of_college_grads_return_to_nest_kjMXejGjOymsRom3pz9gaM?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME= http://fullphaser1.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/how-do-we-sleep-while-our-beds-are-burning/
/r/MensRights12/05/11 10:56 PM
5

Women are the primary consumers in society. Television is made to serve advertisers who want to get money from consumers. Thus, television is made to serve women.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 10:39 PM
0

It's basically just another name for MWGTOW, isn't it?
/r/MensRights12/05/11 10:28 PM
7

Feminism is a religion to most feminists. By criticizing it, they cast you out as a heretic. They're fundamentalists.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 09:33 PM
22

A good summary of college rape-hysteria and male-bashing that we're all too familiar with. Liked this quote: It's easier to pretend that our college campuses are cisterns of predatory male sexual violence than to go to where there's really a problem but where you won't get paid.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 12:30 PM
2

Feminists like to ignore some of the terrible things their "womyn" sisters have said about trans people: http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/15398/michigan-womyns-music-festival-lesbian-and-feminist-musical-artists-supporting-segregation
/r/MensRights12/05/11 08:48 AM
2

This seems to be the direct blog post of it http://owningyourshit.blogspot.com/2011/05/female-privilege-checklist.html I believe she posted it on 2XC but they deleted it.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 05:28 AM
11

MR is not about liking or disliking women.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 04:47 AM
1

Clearly, the only way to be emotionally and psychologically healthy is to express emotions like a woman would. Women are perfect, after all, we should emulate them in all we do. Introversion and stoicness are outdated traits of the caveman, we're in the 21st century now.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 09:42 PM
1

Maybe because he's a massive spammer.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:02 AM
1

Some people don't like or respect thoughtless sexual promiscuity. Imagine that.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 08:53 PM
5

Looking at it from a purely economical way, with men's social status being so tied with their financial status, when the economy tanks they simply adapt. They don't really have a choice but to refuse to take those statuses in the first place, and all the things that go with it (marriage, etc). How can you move into adulthood when there's no structure to do so? http://fullphaser1.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/how-do-we-sleep-while-our-beds-are-burning/ Of course another element is the relationship mar…
/r/MensRights07/05/11 08:51 PM
2

The only "men's right" issue modern feminism ever cares about is letting men wear pink (thank heavens for that!), because it's the only thing that fits in with it's "females/femininity is oppressed" ideology. It actively fights against or ignores all other actual MRA stances.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 08:02 PM
-2

It's simply beautiful. I defy anyone to read through feminist blogs and not say that feminists are positively fucking bonkers.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 02:16 PM
0

Enough do.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:53 PM
1

And in many places feminist dogma has done a lot for the common man. Ugh, here we go with this, now. I don't know why we bother. The essentialist practice of labeling all feminists mysandrists is in my opinion detrimental to the Male rights cause. All feminists may not be misandrists, but all feminism is no matter how you slice it.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:44 PM
3

The main reason I'm spending all this time on the issue of not demonizing the label feminism is because men need to learn to use it for their own benefit. A feminist is weaponless against a man that claims to be a feminist and backs it up with a good egalitarian argument. No, it isn't. You can be the biggest (pro)feminist in the world, a woman even, and you are banished from the sisterhood at the slightest criticism, bomb threats and all. They will screech and holler at you for even the slightes…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 12:22 PM
0

No, if a person is feminist that persons gender is not defined by the term. The ideology, however, is defined by it. Just as how FireMAN defines the person as a man, FEMINIsm defines the ideology as female-centric. Therefore, by it's very name, it is not universal for all genders, and can never be called as such. If you say it's just meaningless semantics, then so is firemen. Yet feminists hate that gendered word and fought so hard to wipe it out of public language and declare it un-PC. They'll …
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:55 AM
7

I responded at length, but apparently it was not what they wanted to hear. ooh tell us more
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:33 AM
3

Everyone knows there isn't some global conspiracy by men to subvert women. No, not everybody knows this. It's not some fringe crackpot theory for radicals that can be handwaved away as irrelevant and minor, it's the very regular and dominant belief in much of feminist education and media today.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:26 AM
3

If labels don't matter anymore, can I call them Firemen now and not firefighters, without getting sued by feminist lobbyists?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 06:57 AM
3

Nobody really cares what ideology you were subjected to in Sweden. and in your eye's I'm a MRA Ha. If you really were an MRA, you would be banned from any feminist-driven circle or discussion on the internet, or anywhere at all in real life in America. Feminism is a victim ideology driven by the patriarchy conspiracy theory, sending a collective sense of oppression on the female, and a collective sense of guilt on the male. No matter how filtered and whitewashed it gets as it travels down to the…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 06:55 AM
2

I'm a guy. I think I should be allowed to speak for men. It's not whether you speak for men or not, it's whether you're letting feminism speak for men or not. Feminism is not some kind of neutral, unbiased gender equality ideology, and never will be, no matter how desperately third-wavers want it to be. I don't have a single male friend in Sweden that doesn't identify as a feminist. We have embraced that label as synonymous with egaliterian. Again, it doesn't matter who you talk to or who your f…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 06:30 AM
2

Being presumed innocent before proven guilty is too radical an idea. This will never pass.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 05:52 AM
3

If I grew up being egaliaterian, but under the label of feminism, isn't feminism also egaliterianism in this case? An apple calling itself an orange doesn't mean that apples = oranges. It just means that the apple is wrong. If you grew up being egalitarian under the guise the feminism, then you're still just an egalitarian, and your 'version' of feminism isn't what's being practiced in the real political world right now. The problem I have is when feminism operates under the guise of all-encompa…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 05:45 AM
6

It doesn't matter who you've met. Radical feminists are not the drastic minority, they're the powerful majority. http://www.daddys-sverige.com/3/post/2011/03/the-truth-about-swedish-feminism-do-not-watch-this-film.html
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:03 AM
0

Ahaha, julianpenrod's comment is pure lunacy.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:29 AM
2

Mostly very silly. She's obviously extremely predisposed against to the idea, so I didn't expect much. It's really a good insight into how an immovable, entrenched feminist perceives MRA literature, and who truly believes feminism is good and benevolent for all, and it's extremism is but an irrelevant fringe. Funny bit at the end: How can I form a partnership with someone who doesn't recognize that the system is rigged in his favor And from her other post: most feminists, obviously, do not hold …
/r/MensRights03/05/11 04:54 PM
3

Not many people know about it, and it's a good history lesson regardless.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 09:28 PM
5

I don't even know what to say, really. Other than I'm not surprised in the least.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 09:25 AM
19

Here's the full Gender War documentary spoken of in the article (scroll down): http://www.daddys-sverige.com/3/post/2011/03/the-truth-about-swedish-feminism-do-not-watch-this-film.html One section to give you a little taste (turn on Closed Captions): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f98fY7NDKM8 Some more articles on swedish feminism and the controversy the film caused: http://www.alternet.org/story/24655/ http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/20/world/europe/20iht-feminism.html Swedish Feminism is pretty…
/r/MensRights01/05/11 08:05 AM
8

True feminism is everything good about feminism. Fake feminism is everything bad about feminism. Therefore real feminism is perfect and anyone who criticizes it is a misogynist caveman.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 03:31 AM
1

Seriously, stop spamming that everywhere.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 09:42 PM
1

they use more 'manly' ways of killing themselves such as guns It's nothing about it being "manly", it's about it being effective. Most women intentionally avoid effectively comitting suicide because they don't truly intend to kill themselves in the first place. They fully expect their 'attempts' to fail, thus they're not truly attempts at all. Support groups play little part in the equation.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 09:33 PM
8

Feminists say it's the men's own fault (what isn't?) because it's their own inherently emotion-denying masculinity that drives them to suicide. If only men would learn to express their feelings like women, the problem would disappear. Of course this is a fantasy, because nobody cares about a struggling man's feelings, least of all feminists. After all, it's misogynistic to pay attention to a man because it takes away attention from women, who are always worse off.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 09:27 PM
3

Just think of all the "You don't know about REAL feminism!" and "You need to take a women's studies class and get educated!" comments you'll get!
/r/MensRights30/04/11 11:56 AM
9

This has been going on for years and it's only going to get worse, in a nosedive. And the feminists will cheer at their labours. Reminds me too much of this article, true even though it was written 10 years ago: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2001/aug/14/edinburghfestival2001.edinburghbookfestival2001 "I was in a class of nine- and 10-year-olds, girls and boys, and this young woman was telling these kids that the reason for wars was the innately violent nature of men. You could see the little girl…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 11:18 AM
4

Clearly, the patriarchy brainwashes them into wanting to take off time from work more often than men.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 12:44 AM
2

Under extremist modern feminism, there can be no female autonomy or agency because there is no expectation of self-sufficiency, accountability, or responsibility placed on women. Well, if feminism endorsed true autonomy, the ideology disappears because it is inherently structured around Women as the oppressed proletariats and Men/The Patriarchy as the oppressive bourgeois. It really can't exist without that power structure in place, so modern feminists try to lock those positions in an eternal s…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 12:14 AM
2

When isn't MRM misrepresented by outside sources?
/r/MensRights27/04/11 01:29 AM
3

She's a conservative christian anti-feminist woman who grew up on a farm. Even if you disagree on some of her opinions, it is a different point of view regardless. This one was my favourite: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pO0pJ4mms8 edit: also this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-_6wwHpAr8
/r/MensRights27/04/11 12:35 AM
18

They're against it because it proposes that women can gain any kind of benefit from men at all, especially in the symbolically oppressive act of sex. In fact, semen-scientists are just rape apologists in disguise, trying to say they support rape because it's healthy for the women. Clearly, such scientific studies should be banned, because any kind of study that says that men can be good for anything is just a work of The Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 06:22 AM
1

it's stupid, yes, but let's not fall into a NAMRAALT trap, guys.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 12:49 AM
1

So, the problem with transgenderism – which is obviously an expression of men’s sexual rights as well of course( it’s very much about the right to be sexually excited by female clothing, and subordination and so on). Oh lol. This whole thing sounds like it was written by a crackpot.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:30 AM
6

Women need a safe place to be women! Wanting to shut down sororities is misogynistic!
/r/MensRights24/04/11 03:30 AM
2

TicTok hates MR and has made that abundantly clear in the past, don't bother giving him any more attention.
/r/MensRights21/04/11 02:48 AM
2

Men aren’t allowed to comment on this blog, even if they are agreeing with me. As states my comment policy none of you MRAs bothered to read. Uh oh, guys. Also, inb4 the inevitable NAFALTs
/r/MensRights21/04/11 01:10 AM
2

sexual abuse and rape prevention education. ie. a 50 year old woman yelling at the men to stop raping people for two hours.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 10:57 PM
1

Everyone knows logic and facts are tools of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 11:03 AM
3

If PUA is abuse, wouldn't Cosmo dating advice be the same?
/r/MensRights20/04/11 10:40 AM
4

If a woman wants to do it, there is nothing you can do to avoid being falsely accused.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 10:22 AM
16

I'm not surprised. Sweden is the Mordor of feminism.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 09:44 AM
1

I definitely like 13 and 14. 15 is pretty funny though, it reminds me of churches desperately trying to get back increasingly non-religious youths.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 08:21 AM
1

It's not much of a conspiracy if it's open about it.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 07:28 AM
2

Yeah, Angry Harry's always rubbed me the wrong way.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 06:51 AM
8

No no, you don't understand: Women lowering their standards for men = Women being 'oppressed' by men. All benefits, all privileges, no responsibilities, no sacrifice.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 11:28 PM
16

When men can't please women, it's the men's fault for not pandering to her needs. When women can't please men, it's the men's fault for not fitting to their ideal.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 11:18 PM
2

There is no evidence against you so I think you'll be fine That's not how these things work.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 11:02 PM
2

I believe in both nature and nurture, and I believe we should respect both aspects of humanity. I think a lot of feminists in a post-modern fervor try to deny nature wholesale, and criticize people willfully acting in "traditional" roles (because masculine males+feminine females is a product of the evil oppressive patriarchy). I believe in respecting masculinity in males, femininity in males, masculinity in females, and femininity in females. Demonizing or shaming any of them and pitting them ag…
/r/MensRights16/04/11 05:22 AM
4

I do appreciate the sentiments, and especially her acknowledgement of women's privileges, but I don't really trust feminism with male issues. I also can never appreciate feminist views on masculine behavior. It's always so wrong. Being stoic, not crying, etc... are not necessarily signs of psychological imbalance. Most men and some women are like that, and they feel best behaving that way. Having a Big Cry about everything isn't going to make them feel better. It's like feminist psychology seems…
/r/MensRights15/04/11 11:35 AM
0

The other side of the coin/equation is that women aren't entitled to male resources and protection. Well, not unless they legislate it!
/r/MensRights15/04/11 12:46 AM
3

After women take a much wider gap, you'll probably start hearing that they do the job better than men. Oh, but they already do! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZymFMmpOa0
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:29 PM
2

This should be good for those declining male college student numbers, right?
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:03 PM
7

Feminism is the movement for equal social, political, and economic rights fro BOTH men and women. BOTH men and women Nope, sorry. Feminism is solely about women. Always has been, always will be. White middle class liberal women, but women nonetheless. Your "true feminism" doesn't exist in the real world, and if it does, it's certainly not called feminism, which often can't even agree with itself. You can't just absolve an ideology of all flaws because only it's perfect theoretical form is the "r…
/r/MensRights13/04/11 05:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter