TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rogue780 Archive

View 0 posts and 479 comments by rogue780 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

Prohibiting someone from doing something because of their race is in fact racism. The definition doesn't change just because the person being enjoined is white.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 09:10 PM
1

So, why do people go through the effort of blurring out identifying details, but do such a shit job at it that you can still read it no problem?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:26 PM
1

And you want to take away a man's right to his child unless he willingly submits to a DNA test. You're also taking away the parents' right to choose how they have their child by forcing them to go to a hospital. You're also assuming that the father will be there at the time of the birth, which is not always possible. So if he has to be away, then what? No father on the birth certificate? Again, it seems you want to satisfy your own insecurity and mistrust by projecting them onto others with the …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:32 AM
0

What rights am I wanting to withhold from men?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:17 AM
1

I feel very sorry for you that you believe equal rights and having an intimate relationship with another person are mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:05 PM
0

I'm sorry that you're so bitter you can't trust anyone again. That has to really suck. I highly recommend some of Brene Brown's books. She shares a lot of research about vulnerability, trust, and belonging. It's really helpful stuff.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:58 PM
1

Yeah, I'd rather my marriage be based on trust. But, to whom do I opt out of the procedure? There I am, in our house. I've just caught my baby, cut the umbilical cord, and seen to my wife's health. Now should I need to drive to the police station with my 3 hour old son to opt out? To the nearest hospital? The post office?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:12 PM
-2

Being forced to do something takes away rights. Having the option to do something protects rights. I will never side with the former.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:40 PM
1

It's clear you've got a big chip on your shoulder and nothing I say will sway you. But, I'll state my position anyway. Let me be clear, everyone should have the right to verify their paternity at any time, but they should also have the right to choose to trust. Your insecurities shouldn't translate into a reduction of rights.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:50 PM
-1

That still shouldn't trump an individual's right to consent.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:47 PM
0

Yes. Or is it not worthy of needing consent because it doesn't break the skin or something?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:47 PM
-7

Why should I be forced to undergo a medical procedure to have my name put on my kid's birth certificate?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 04:25 AM
1

In other words she agreed to do it. So she should accept the consequences of her decision. Yes. She agreed to it on the understanding that I would be the one making an income. No, but I have schooled an entire class of children, in a foreign language, at a private school in Europe. Even that is easier then having a real job. So, teaching isn't a real job? And I hope that foreign language wasn't English. By that logic you have no standing to say how demanding being a SAHP is because you've never …
/r/MensRights09/11/17 05:25 PM
1

Again whose choice was that? It was a mutual decision. Did you hold a gun to her head and force her to home school two kids? Is this how you make decisions with your family? Staying home and home schooling two kids is still easier then working at a demanding corporate job. And my job as a software engineer is a lot easier than a demanding corporate job -- and it probably pays better than most of them. By the way, you never answered my question. Did you home school your kids? It's naive to judge …
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:17 PM
0

Did you homeschool two kids?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:18 PM
3

In my family it was a mutual choice. My wife didn't unilaterally decide to stay home and eat bonbons all day. She left a promising career at NASA and what she's doing with our two kids now is, frankly, more difficult than her previous engineering job.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:12 AM
1

Eh....maybe. If I'm making a shit ton of money and my wife and I agreed she would stay home and raise the kids, then I decided to end the marriage at no fault of her own, it makes sense to continue to provide for her for a period of time until she is able to sustain herself.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:09 AM
1

I prefer parabolic absolutes
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:07 AM
1

So it's OK up until the point that an officer kills someone. Everything is fair game? Don't be daft.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:40 PM
1

That's not actually a valid measure of right, wrong, or legal.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:33 PM
1

I can define that punching someone in the face is not the minimum force needed to protect against a drunken, flailing, arm.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:04 PM
1

Then you shouldn't be stupid yourself. Police officers especially have a moral obligation to those who are attacking them once the threat to their life and others' lives is over.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:00 PM
0

Ok, bootlicker.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:43 PM
1

It was more than enough force. It was enough force to cause injury when he was not at risk of suffering injury from a flailing arm.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:41 PM
1

You have no moral obligation to your attacker, don't be daft. So why didn't he just shoot her? That would have been justified, right?
/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:40 PM
1

Police are fucking humans too you know? So? Why should they tolerate abuse? Because when they agreed to become an agent of the state and act under the color of law, they agreed to curtail their own rights in order to protect the rights of others. When you wear that uniform and you do something, it's not you doing it. It's the state doing it. Their job isnt to be a piece of fucking meat, if someone obstructs them from their duty they need to act. So, grab her arm and restrain her. A need to act d…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:40 PM
-4

She slapped him as she's being carried. He punched her in the face. I don't care what one's gender is, if you're a police officer you should be restrained and only use as much force as is necessary to perform your lawful duties.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 04:33 AM
-10

That's exactly what police signed up to be: to do a hard job with restraint; not do a hard job and act like everybody else.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 04:33 AM
11

Then dumb black people isn't offensive. If all black people were dumb, it wouldn't need the qualifier...
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:50 PM
72

Because it makes it sound as if masculinity is toxic. If people went around talking about stupid black people, it would be assumed that they were saying all black people are stupid, not that they were talking about a subset of the black demographic that are stupid. Additionally, in feminism, almost all things bad that are gendered are male and all things good that are gendered are female. It's a harmful double standard.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 01:33 PM
2

I wonder if this is because women are less likely to "settle" for a job as a taxi driver, bus driver, delivery driver, etc.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:42 AM
2

Based on her twitter, I think she's really suffering from mental illness. It's an amazing experience to read all her replies to herself.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:25 AM
4

Doesn't matter had sex
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:59 PM
3

DMHS?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:13 PM
10

just forward it to some 3rd wave feminist blog?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 01:15 AM
29

OnlyTrueFacts.com huh. it's actually available. I'm so tempted.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 11:19 PM
12

You'll read removed comments. It doesn't show comments the user removed, only comments that were removed by the moderators.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 11:17 PM
1

Let's all learn the etymology of the word "mankind"
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:01 PM
3

/r/titlegore
/r/MensRights28/01/17 11:40 PM
6

You didn't block her name out on the last one.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:07 AM
2

You forgot the comma
/r/MensRights16/10/16 02:14 PM
2

You must not be from the east coast north of Virgina
/r/MensRights25/09/16 05:52 AM
1

Who was found hanged? The mum? The family of the mum?
/r/MensRights01/08/16 01:37 PM
25

/r/titlegore
/r/MensRights01/08/16 03:16 AM
1

Can someone find a second source for this? The linked fox26 houston article is a 404.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:36 AM
1

So, fwiw, this piece was originally published in 2011 and has since been removed from the original site sometime last year. The original author, who is a white male living in America, also issued an apology in 2011. I don't know if it's allowed here (mods chime in please) but I did track down the original article on archive.org as well as the apology and I can post them if it's allowed.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 06:59 PM
1

You need to keep up. The conversation evolved to talk about what feminism is. You seemed to acknowledge this when you did your whole "I'm an old man" speech.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 09:18 PM
2

You're still making assumptions, but let's go down your rabbit hole. Show me a mainstream feminist who has support from "the base" who advocates for equal custody with equal child support, who also advocates for equality wrt selective service and the draft (but who had this belief prior to women starting to be on the hook for these things. Bonus if her position is to have women be in the draft rather than abolishing the social security), someone who sees the homeless problem and isn't upset beca…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:30 AM
1

You're making a lot of assumptions.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:49 AM
2

feminism is about advancing women.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:07 PM
2

This is why feminism isn't actually for equality -- but rather for advancing women. Sometimes these goals intersect, but as society has progressed, the times where they don't intersect is becoming more frequent. This is literally one of the reasons why the MRA exists -- to recognize and try to change social perception and misandry.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:06 PM
4

Eh, not all universities are like that. There are plenty of sane* ones.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 02:11 PM
5

Or better yet, admissions should be blind wrt gender, race, etc.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 02:10 PM
6

This is the first step in getting rid of the SS
/r/MensRights02/05/16 05:28 AM
3

This definition differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:44 PM
9

I love the ads on the right.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:40 PM
1

I'm referring to prisoner-to-prisoner violence. But as far as what you're referring to, I have the same belief as with police: no unnecessary force.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:02 PM
1

Well, I'm done spending my time with you. It's obvious you've got a huge chip on your shoulder, and that's fine. I hope you get better.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:46 AM
2

I just want to call attention to the fact that /u/DrRadicalMD deleted his/her comments here for some reason. Or perhaps it was the mods?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:14 AM
2

Well, she's not actually facing prison. She's facing jail. There's a huge difference. Secondly, because one supports incarceration or legal penalties for something does not mean one supports violence against another. We have a huge prison violence problem that needs to be addressed.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:56 PM
1

What? I can't here you from down there.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:43 PM
9

There's a difference between judicial punishment for an offense and wishing violence be inflicted on another person. The latter makes you as bad or worse than the person you're talking about.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:21 PM
11

I love how you use a downvoted comment to illustrate your idea of the mens rights community.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 10:58 PM
5

That's like almost my whole fucking life up until this point.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 05:10 PM
2

I can't tell if this is satire or sincere
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:37 PM
3

I wouldn't say it's complaining so much as providing context to this post.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:46 PM
1

I guess I read more into her burying her TV and being unable to leave the couch so long she was able to knit a thneed. And there being male versions of the ad (haven't seen them btw) somehow negates there's a woman in this one?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:58 PM
1

I'm not sure. I actually think a woman could fit in the Doritos commercials. Have you seen the Show Hole commercial that Amazon has? Here it is if you haven't seen it. It paints a woman as a lazy, obsessed, superficially depressed, television addict and there hasn't been any outrage about it as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:10 PM
3

It's still patriarchy that's to blame for wars /s
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:11 PM
1

Happy cake day! I would agree with you, but the posts are actually a little different.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:12 PM
1

It's healthier than wishing someone be brutally assaulted.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:25 AM
1

I didn't downvote you.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:52 AM
3

You should get that pinecone out of your ass someday. You're a fucked up dude and I hope you get help.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:18 AM
6

I hope you get raped by 8 men. Not that I'm advocating it. I just said it because I mean the opposite.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:07 AM
1

I hope that judge gets raped by 8 men
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:06 AM
1

eh?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:05 AM
6

I'm having a hard time believing that FemPlus+ isn't satirical.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:23 PM
15

Scotland?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:33 PM
7

No, DON'T fuck her Don't worry. I won't.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:29 PM
32

What exactly is your point?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:49 PM
1

Interesting that I can't find any of these on twitter.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:20 PM
2

I'm 6'4 and weigh 270. Overweight? Sure. Able to run a 5k in under 30 minutes? Yup.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:41 PM
0

Tell me in quantifiable detail exactly how my dad's weight has harmed you.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:04 AM
2

At this point he doesn't have the use of his legs or arms. There's not much that anyone can do at this point. And he has seizures when he gets too hungry, so that's fun. Btw, as an aside, when it's something countable (such as calories, crayons, tires, etc) the word to use if fewer. When it's something that's not countable, but has an amount (such as fat, red, air) the word to use is less.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:34 AM
2

You can't educate someone whose cognitive abilities are about half that of a normal person.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:32 AM
3

I live 2000 miles away from him, and he's an adult. What do you expect me to do, exactly? Here's the thing. His weight in no way affects you. You're shitty attitude and actions affect people who are overweight. And guess what makes people feel better? Food. It's a cycle that you help perpetuate.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:31 AM
-9

My dad has had MS for over 35 years. One of the drugs he's been on for a long time is prednisone and it has the side effect of weight gain. His legs don't work because the nerves literally don't transmit the correct signals to them. People like you would ridicule him because he weighs 350lbs and can't walk.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:45 AM
–

Posting pictures of and doxxing fat people is.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:43 AM
-22

I would say they are less of an asshat than people who harass people for their weight.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:11 AM
–

it's their site. they can censor whatever they want
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:44 PM
1

I don't think that's completely accurate even in a general sense.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:55 PM
3

"Fake nerd girls", imo, are the same as unathletic dudes sitting in a recliner, drinking beer, watching the football game while wearing a jersey of their favorite player. There's really nothing wrong with it so long as it makes them feel good.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:18 PM
3

Thanks
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:25 PM
12

I'm trying to find this post, but there's only one post on their page from the 26th: http://i.imgur.com/Ii6DexJ.png
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:20 PM
11

Have you been holding on to this for a year?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:16 PM
1

I used to be a figure skater. It was fun and while the male:female ratio definitely favored women, there was no real difference in the quality of skating by either gender. When I stopped skating I had 2 two gold medals in individual events and 1 bronze medal in pairs skating from world championships.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:36 PM
0

What name did he call you?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:31 PM
15

You should look up what scolding is too.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:02 AM
1

Sorry. s/San Francisco/California
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:14 AM
0

have a better one that's not the daily fail?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:56 PM
9

Right...which is how I deduced it was Broward College and not Brown University...
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:40 PM
35

I'm almost certain this is for Broward College not Brown University.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 02:29 PM
1

I'm sorry, but you reminded me of this https://youtu.be/FyD5e0APWQI?t=2m11s
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:50 PM
2

There's no such thing as a private facebook anything
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:34 PM
2

parked, stopped, flipped over and on fire. makes no difference to the laws of physics
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:05 PM
1

I have no idea what you are trying to say in most of your first paragraph. sounds like you have a reading deficiency.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:03 PM
3

This sub is about equality in the context of a social construct. As you say, pregnancy can only happen to women. That isn't a social construct. Should we say, "no, women, it offends us that there are 3 parking spaces for you when you're pregnant so you can't have them"? That makes 0 sense. And disabled parking is for people who are, well, disabled. Pregnancy is not a disability, though it does make life harder for women who are pregnant. Pregnancy/nursing are basically the two legitimate physiol…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:03 AM
3

Fuck, dude. Are you dense? Regardless of what nomenclature you choose to use, pregnancy makes it difficult to walk, difficult to go long periods of time without peeing, difficult to sit, difficult to lie down, difficult to carry things, etc. Why would you be against having a place for people who are pregnant so they don't have to walk as far to the fucking grocery store?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:44 AM
3

Some stores believe that veterans should be honored and choose to express the gratitude they feel by providing 2 up-close parking spots. They used to have ones for "parents with small children" as well, but those got taken away for some reason.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:33 AM
-1

Wait. You think that being pregnant is not a medical condition called...pregnancy? Shit. I guess we can tell all the obstetricians to pack up and go home because their chosen medical field doesn't exist at all.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:11 AM
4

My point is people make stupid assumptions based on gender. Also, no. My wife and I are actually both rated with service-connected disabilities (she broke her back during training and I have a bulging disc from stopping my vehicle with a non-moving vehicle, as well as knee and hip pain along with tinnitus and nearly constant migraines.) and we can't park in handicap parking. I don't know where you got this bad information, but it is misinformation.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:01 AM
2

No, /u/bulloni and /u/bulloni's girlfriend
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:57 AM
–

Pregnancy affects different women differently. It's not a disease, but it is a medical condition. You two can go fuck yourselves.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:48 AM
11

Somewhat related. My wife and I went to a local Harris Teeter a few weeks ago. She stayed in the car to nurse the 4 month old while I ran in to get something. We parked in the veteran parking spot (my wife and I were both in the military). Apparently some guy who parked in the opposing veteran parking spot yelled at her about how the spot is for veterans only, and took her picture with the sign in the background. We're waiting for it to show up on social media.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:47 AM
–

Do you live in a bubble under a rock? You've never heard of a snipe hunt?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 12:37 PM
4

I'm 6'4 and weigh 280lbs. I don't go to parks alone at night and will rarely walk down a city sidewalk at night. It's just common sense to avoid dangerous situations.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:03 PM
2

Hard to look her up with the names redacted
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:52 AM
8

Which subreddit? I'm honestly curious.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 10:30 PM
2

Yeah, I downvoted this due to that.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:54 AM
0

Which is why body/dash cams should be mandatory
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:37 PM
7

Well, if she did actually strike an officer with her car, then that is a legitimate reason to open fire. I would shoot someone who I thought was trying to kill me or my friend with their car.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 11:08 PM
1

And nasty is loving it about 10x more than she loved your dick.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:44 AM
2

¿por que no los dos?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:41 AM
8

To quote /u/walkonthebeach He's commenting on the fact that even a pin-prick to a girls' vulva is considered to be "serious harm" in the eyes of the law, whilst an infant boy can have a very large part of his penis amputated for no medical reason, as that is seen as OK. So it's not a matter of deciding that only the worst one should be outlawed, but that one that is demonstrably worse is legal while one that is minor in comparison is illegal.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:19 PM
1

Things get complicated since I stand to wipe
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:24 PM
3

Also, as someone who is 6'4, I'm tired of feeling awkward standing in a stall and have my nose higher than the top of the door.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:15 AM
10

All the mens didn't rape the wymyns?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:34 AM
2

Why not make restrooms only unisex with stalls that have floor to ceiling doors?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:30 AM
2

Fuck the Ravens, dude.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 12:01 AM
4

Yes, because what I want is a Russian controlled website on which to discuss politics.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 07:56 PM
3

How would that even work?
/r/MensRights03/01/15 07:55 PM
1

By your logic there is never a reason to do anything, only inducements. Except that inducements and reasons aren't mutually exclusive. An inducement is "a thing that persuades or influences someone to do something", such as a reason.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:45 PM
2

yup...well Air Force, so some might question whether it was military or not ;)
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:22 PM
0

If my wife and I hadn't gotten legally married we would have been forced to be geographically separated for many years likely ending our relationship.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:09 AM
1

mens made her do it.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 07:44 AM
1

that's what I said.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 03:27 PM
2

You used CP to justify protecting your children. No, she used protecting her children to justifying CP
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:33 AM
0

You're late to the party with this comment.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 03:57 PM
18

We (teenage republican club) did this about 12 years ago to highlight the fact that affirmative action is discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:15 PM
1

Or, as some would say, his pinkie finger
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:00 AM
2

Actually, I believe the feminist perspective is that there are biological differences, but society shouldn't allow them to induce social differences.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:45 AM
2

can someone fill me in on this gamergate thing?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:00 AM
1

Ha. You're probably the only one who actually guessed.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:49 PM
1

the woman got sentenced to 1,590 years
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:36 PM
1

because they're sex offenders therefore public record, and they don't live there anymore so who cares? I dunno.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:05 PM
1

But they got the maximum for each charge. The sentence for each charge was equal, she got more. Isn't equal what we're going for?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:34 PM
2

I thought this was relevant because in this instance the man and the woman each got the maximum sentence for each of the crimes they were charged with, with the woman getting many more years on her sentence than the man. It seems to buck the trend of men receiving harsher sentences for the same crime.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:14 PM
1

Our society is failing? Really? By what standard?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:13 PM
1

Addvertising?
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:57 AM
6

I think her children will be future subscribers to /r/raisedbynarcissists
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:20 AM
6

It depends if it's at will employment or not.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:14 AM
1

Clench your anus. The sarcasm is leaking out.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:53 PM
1

Getting back to the question at hand, you certainly did stump me with that one. I guess I'm not sure why you just didn't say that at first. Because it doesn't really matter. Anyway, seeing how this applies to, what, 0.0000001 of the population, I hardly see how this situation is important in this debate There are more than 30 people in the military who are married to other military members. You, frankly, walked right into it. And I fucking love it. At the end of the day, for you and me it doesn'…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 08:03 PM
1

So, this is a great example of your narrow-mindedness. You can't conceive of something that you haven't experienced and so you think that there are no circumstances outside of your limited experience. In our case it was because we met early on in a very long school in the military. During that schooling, her job was changed and it would be impossible at our rank to be stationed together. Sure enough, I had orders to Texas and she had orders to Korea. You see, in the military when you're given or…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:41 PM
1

You are wrong. But that's what I get from trying to explain something in terms that I thought you would understand. The truth is that there are intangible benefits that are subjective for every couple. Tax benefits is a benefit. Shared credit is a benefit. Not being forced to live apart is another benefit.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:47 PM
1

It's when two parties are forced to live in different geographical areas that are far enough apart that traveling between the two frequently becomes economically unfeasible.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:45 PM
1

But we did have to. And it's you. (hint: there are other reasons to become geographically separated than immigration)
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:43 PM
-1

And to prevent geographical separation, which is one of the reasons we got married about 10 years ago.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:02 PM
1

You really see no benefit to legally being married? Shared assets, additional legal rights, tax benefits, etc?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:01 PM
0

I got banned for being an MRA. Can you believe it? I can be for men's rights, but disagree on certain parts of the nebulous platform. It's like we're all individuals or something.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:01 PM
-4

Yup. /u/carchamp1 is pretty misinformed.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:00 PM
1

No Visa issues. I'm from Oregon and she's from Tennessee. Not sure where you're getting the idea that one of us is a foreigner.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:59 PM
1

Are you fucking stupid? Where did I say green card? I said geographically separated.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:58 PM
-3

Sure there is. When my wife and I were 19 we decided to get married to avoid being permanently geographically separated. We're coming up on 10 years pretty soon.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:40 AM
-5

Yes. Let's let fear dictate our lives!
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:39 AM
-4

So you're saying that nobody has morals
/r/MensRights12/09/14 03:23 AM
-6

I didn't recommend it to anyone here, did I? Marriage is NOT for you. Marriage is for HER. If you have any self-respect and enjoy your freedom and any semblance of financial security, then you must stay single. Does, however, indicate that the person who wrote that little gem thinks that women are leeches.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 03:03 AM
-8

such angst
/r/MensRights12/09/14 02:44 AM
-15

that's what a prenup is for
/r/MensRights12/09/14 02:37 AM
-6

That's like pointing out that most businesses fail and saying "that's why nobody should ever start a business" but the reality is the success rate in marriage is much higher than business.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 02:36 AM
-12

No, actually. I'm just saddened that you've been hurt be someone so much that you think so may women are evil sociopaths that simply because of their gender you advise people not to get married. Marriage is many things to many people and your narrow-mindedness is rather pathetic.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:56 AM
-14

Ah. I see your dilemma. You can't read. I'm rogue 780. Please tell the person you have reading to you that reddit usernames are right above the comment.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:17 AM
-6

I wholeheartedly disagree.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:16 AM
4

I think you're a bit too sensitive.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 08:47 PM
-24

wow you're a fucking idiot
/r/MensRights11/09/14 08:47 PM
3

good for you. Not all of us have the same opinions.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:30 AM
1

engineers are people too.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:08 AM
3

as an engineer, I wish there were more women in my field. I get tired of being around guys all the time.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 12:40 AM
6

does Tesla underwear let you transmit your powers remotely?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 12:39 AM
11

Having a police force is rape culture then.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:58 PM
2

Really, I don't think that having sex with anyone 16 or older should be a crime.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:55 PM
1

The majority of Chivalry involves rules for combat.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 01:37 PM
1

And yet that was the punishment the eighth amendment was prompted by due to it's common practice.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:53 PM
2

So, as long as we would draw and quarter all murderers then it wouldn't meet the definition in the eighth amendment?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:18 PM
4

as her father had disappointing her. sounds like the daily mail...yup. daily mail.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:42 PM
0

Nope. Just went on with his life.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:14 PM
7

He ended up getting a...journalism degree I think, had a hard time getting a job for a while and just recently went into the Air Force and is expecting his first child this month. All in all everything turned out fine for him, but he had to give up on his first passion
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:27 AM
16

I have a friend from high school who went to one of the universities in town to become an elementary school teacher. During one of his first student teaching outings, he went to a local elementary school and was told by the principal that they wouldn't hire him because men are perceived as sexual predators.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:06 AM
3

And they're a private company and are free to spend their money training anybody whom they choose.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:05 AM
6

So, you also want to create a buffer for people on strike because they might "harass" non-union workers coming in to cover their jobs while they striking? Or, any protest really. Might as well have a free speech zone in every city that people can protest at. There is no right not to be offended. There is, however, a constitutionally protected right to protest. If you feel so passionately about all this, maybe you should organize counter protests like people did against the WBBC.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:32 PM
5

The fact is you want to chip away at protected rights on public property.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:40 AM
-1

That guys voice is super annoying. Couldn't listen to it.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:19 AM
2

boys are more likely to be miscarried too.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:26 PM
-1

More like how statism poisoned 10,000 Americans.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:52 PM
2

from the top comment http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID34-PR34-Gender%20differences%20in%20hostility.pdf
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:30 AM
1

I got blocked by someone because I countered "Not all women threaten men, but all men have been threatened by women"
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:26 AM
5

It's about as common as finding a Thai restaurant in Maryland. Not the most common thing there, but definitely not so uncommon that you'd do a double take.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:44 PM
4

You've never been to Eugene, have you?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:25 PM
4

Something tells me she has under the table wages
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:06 PM
17

have you tried tracking her down using a PI?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:33 PM
6

You can file civil suit against her and get a judgement. Once there's a judgement, her wages can be garnished.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:19 PM
6

In other news: Cops violate man's right by preventing him from jumping off a tall building.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:46 AM
-8

Uh, fuck no. I'm not going to force my kid to have medically unnecessary tests without cause.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:29 PM
14

what happened to tosh?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:40 AM
1

No, she was already convicted of simple battery, which is a misdemeanor (but not sexual assault). She is set to stand trial for lying to the police, which is a felony.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:46 PM
0

Well, who the fuck cares? All medals from figure skating had women on them.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:43 PM
2

s/career/carer
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:24 PM
1

you've never been to texas, have you?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:04 PM
4

I'd rather a criminal go free than an innocent person go to jail.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:53 PM
1

except texas has laws to protect people from prosecution in circumstances like this.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:47 PM
2

do you think he had mens rea?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:16 PM
7

If the father did think the boy was there against his daughter's will and he really did think the boy was grabbing after a weapon, he was well within his rights to shoot the boy. I know I would shoot someone in my home who I had reason to believe intended to harm a family member and who I reasonably thought was reaching for a weapon. The question here is who is to blame and for what? The girl mislead her father and that lie caused her father to react differently than if the girl admitted the boy…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:49 PM
4

Resenting a child and being emotionally unavailable doesn't make you an unfit parent? /r/raisedbynarcissists would disagree with you
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:25 PM
-4

it's anti-sarkeesian, which is about the same thing these days
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:26 PM
1

it's not that. I think any private entity should be able to refuse service to anyone they choose as well as hire anyone they choose for any reason whatsoever. I think it's a basic freedom. If people don't like how they exercise that freedom then the market will decide their fate.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:09 PM
-6

shouldn't be illegal
/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:34 AM
3

what rights do the accused enjoy in canada?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:59 PM
1

It's not naive, it's idealistic. Absolute trust should be a prerequisite for marriage. If you don't have that, then you have no business getting married.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:03 PM
2

It should be opt-in rather than opt-out, and it can be easily done using umbilical cord tissue so neither the mother nor the child are undergoing unnecessary and nonconsensual tests. In the end, though, couples who have children should do so with people they can trust.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 03:58 PM
2

Well "seeming" mandatory is a far cry from being mandatory. Not necessarily, especially when it comes to medical procedures. I would hope that all new parents educate themselves on the procedures that go into the childbirth process. I would hope that too. I would also hope that before people become parents they are with a partner that they can trust. And even if it isn't mandatory, or if the birth doesn't take place in a hospital, would you have any objection to it being made a more commonplace …
/r/MensRights30/01/14 03:56 PM
2

You seem to think there's a ban on paternity testing or something. Everyone has a right to know, but ffs, if you can't trust your wife then you probably shouldn't be with her. Any father should be able to request a paternity test, but it shouldn't be the default to do so.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 03:51 PM
3

because medical facilities have a way of making "standard procedures" seem mandatory, or end up having policies that require them. I'm against anything that limits personal choice whether explicit or implied. I also think that most births don't need to be done in a hospital, but I'm a bit of a hippie.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:02 AM
5

I'm pretty sure it can even be done with the umbilical cord, so the child doesn't even need to be tested directly.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:30 AM
2

no.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:28 AM
-2

You actually had respect for her?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:31 PM
2

Feminism: giving women the right to choose to be just like the feminists want them to be.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:45 AM
27

screencap?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:17 AM
2

I have such a hard time believing this
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:59 PM
6

Alcohol just makes me really talkative. Whiskey makes me want to write and beer makes me a little sleepy.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:48 PM
3

how big of a dose?
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:54 AM
1

I would argue that it should be legal to humanely kill newborns. And there we have it. Good bye.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:25 PM
1

We don't do it because their past selves wouldn't approve of it. And you think a child's current self would approve of it? A fetus has no past-self that was cognitive. I have no past self either. The fetus has never been aware of its own existence If I'm not aware that I have $100,000 in my bank account and someone steals it, is that not a crime still? Thus, it has never been an entity that would not want to have been killed. This is meaningless. There are probably a lot of things that can be do…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:54 PM
0

So, there's a significant difference here that I don't think you're aware of. When a person is on life support and is brain dead, they actually meet the definition of brain death (imagine that, right?). Now, what is brain death, you might ask? Brain death is: irreversible brain damage causing the end of independent respiration, regarded as indicative of death The key here is irreversible. I'm going to assume you know what irreversible means. This is not the case with a fetus. Their deficient cog…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:43 PM
1

So, it is not wrong to go through hospitals and kill everyone on life support whose cognitive ability is below a certain threshold? Why don't we kill every human who is born but doesn't meet a certain level of cognitive ability?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:27 PM
1

And a child has less cognitive abilities compared to an adult. Is cognitive ability the stick by which we measure whether or not it's acceptable to end the life of another human?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:24 PM
0

Regardless of the semantics of child/fetus, a fetus is still a human that has not reached adulthood.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:17 PM
-5

In order to be a parasite, it must be of a different species.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:00 PM
–

In any case where someone decides to kill a child, the rights of the child are getting pretty heavily trampled.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:25 PM
15

Well, Macy's didn't have a changing table, so I guess I'm going to leave you and your mother, Johnny. Have a good life, son!
/r/MensRights18/11/13 05:27 AM
14

sounds like your cousins might benefit from /r/raisedbynarcissists
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:42 PM
38

We did this about 10 years ago. We called it an affirmative action bake-sale where white males had to pay full price, but depending on a matrix of how much of a minority you are, you got a reduced price. A lot of people who got reduced prices were actually offended...which was kind of the point since it brought attention to how discriminatory affirmative action can be. Are you certain this isn't being done to elicit the same kind of response for the same reason? I mean, if that's the case you ki…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:38 AM
1

I recently read an interview with Piper Kerman about how they were transferring all the women from the women's prison that Orange is the New Black is based on and making into a men's prison and how this would displace the women around the country so it would be nearly impossible for their families to visit them. In the interview it was talked about how how there is an abundance of prisons for men all over the country, but how there are so few prisons for women that making it so there is no priso…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:05 PM
2

Our squadron commander was named Lt. Col Midgette, and I believe she was 4'9" on a waiver. She was the best commander we had. Sure, she made mistakes (all commanders do), but she treated you like a person, made you want to do you job well, and she was the only commander we had who actually qualified on the positions we worked from and would actually work (DCGS) missions with us on the weekends on night shift. She was frickin' awesome. She was also a terrible driver.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:31 PM
2

I just got the same message.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:29 PM
0

Wow! With all those cited sources, you have certainly swayed me.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 12:32 AM
0

Getting Omega 3 from vegan sources is like getting protein from vegan sources, it looks like you can do it on paper, and vegans are desperate to believe it, but it's not a good idea. It actually works, though. It just takes getting used to, like it took you getting used to eating solid food instead of breastmilk. Any dietary change will require your body to make adjustments. It is a fine idea. Please, find me some non-biased sources to support your claim. Vitamin B12 comes from animal sources th…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 12:08 AM
1

Omega 3 fats can get vegan supplements for this Vitamin B12 As most vegans don't consider single celled organisms to be verboten, which is why there are non animal sources for B12 as well. Keep trying.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 11:35 PM
1

Please, oh wise one who is a nutritionist, anthropologist and probably God himself. Tell me what nutrition we need from animals that we can't get from plants. edit: Oh, wait. You're British aren't you?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:15 PM
1

You seem hung up on the idea that because we did something hundreds of thousands of years ago that it means we are bound to that. This is a false argument. Humans are unique in that we have the ability to choose whatever we want now. You again fail to bring any evidence saying that we can't live healthily without meat. I'll give you the inuits. I hadn't factored eating raw meat, whale skin or the contents of caribou stomachs into what I had said before. But, if eating just meat were the best thi…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:51 PM
2

The stomach acid of true carnivores is lower than that of humans. What it seems you've managed to help me point out is that humans are omnivores, meaning they can get their nutrition from either plants or animals. This makes eating meat or plants a choice and therefore if one makes an intentional choice then it is ideologically based. I will reiterate that it is possible to easily get all the nutrition you need from non meat sources, but it is impossible to get all the nutrition you need from pu…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:14 PM
1

Back that up with some evidence. I mean, if you could. We are very different than carnivores: Intestinal length: Our intestinal tracts measure roughly 12 times the length of our torsos (about 30 feet). This allows for the slow absorption of sugars and other water-borne nutrients from fruit. In contrast, the digestive tract of a carnivore is only 3 times the length of its torso. This is necessary to avoid rotting or decomposition of flesh inside the animal. The carnivore depends upon highly acidi…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:38 AM
2

Humans are not carnivores. Please stop spreading that lie.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:18 AM
2

Meat eating isn't an ideology. It's what humans did before agriculture Humans ate whatever was readily available to them. Vegetarianism is purely a social construct. Everything is a social construct if you look at it right. Social contract or not, that doesn't change anything. You are presenting a false argument here. Not murdering you is a social construct. Shitting on a porcelain chair is a social construct. Did you know that there are no pre-agricultural livestock farms? No pre-agricultural d…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:09 AM
2

Well, shit. That must be why vegetarians are dying left and right, isn't it? Or, at the very least have much shorter life spans? Oh, no? Meat eating is simply the dominant ideology in the west right now, but it is no less driven by ideology. The simple fact is that it is very easy to get all the nutrition you need from a plant-based diet. There is absolutely no biological requirement to eat meat.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:28 AM
0

What she wrote is like, literal rape to me. Where do I go to have her arrested? I'm the real victim here.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 02:33 PM
1

Vegetarianism is largely based on ideology Well, then this doesn't make any sense at all. Meat eating is largely based on ideology since meat is not necessary or any more beneficial to the human diet.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 02:31 PM
1

You keep using vegetarianism and veganism interchangeably. Stop that, and try again.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 02:04 PM
1

Wrong sub
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:37 AM
1

Nope. You're woefully misinformed, yet again.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:24 AM
1

Which is the validity of being on a plant based diet. I've already shown a lot of start you spout is nonsense
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:55 PM
2

nice deflection
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:44 AM
1

Feminists are more than willing to acknowledge that boys are naturally worse (and use that to justify discriminatory education practices). I'm not arguing with you, but could you provide some documented cases of this?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:20 AM
2

That's odd. I don't recall using the word intolerance anywhere. edit: except for the last sentence, I suppose, but it is inclusive of allergies and intolerances. Yes there is a difference, specifically in how your body reacts with histamine. Shellfish, in the eyes of a vegan is meat. Fish is meat. Eggs are animal product, etc.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:33 AM
2

And that's stupid, because allergies are only caused by non-meat proteins http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/540042-developed-an-allergy-to-meat-protein-what-to-do http://abcnews.go.com/Health/AllergiesFood/meat-allergies-12-unusual-allergic-reactions-revealed/story?id=9975777 The most common food allergies in adults are shellfish, peanuts, tree nuts, fish, and egg....Protein allergies or intolerance of seeds, nuts, meat, and milk are especially common among children.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:39 PM
2

ahem
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:58 PM
2

They're not buying products and eating food that didn't result in the harm of animals or weren't the product of animal labour. But that's only the point for ethical vegans.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:31 PM
2

I know many people who are vegan and have been vegan for quite some time. Your ideal is the status quo.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:18 PM
3

I don't believe they will. So then your argument is moot.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:13 PM
3

That doubt isn't founded in reason it's founded in opinion based on experience. There is more than just a feed problem with beef. Also, you seem to have an unreasonable belief that the corn subsidies will end sometime soon. The kinds that are produced in large numbers, that vegans think we should eat instead of meat, are not healthy for humans. The 'grains' that don't have those problems, are usually not even grains, but seeds or legumes. Spelt, millet, quinoa, rice, just to name a few. But I do…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:58 AM
3

Grains shouldn't be subsidised so they're only produced in the amount they're actually needed I agree wholeheartedly. that'll fix the beef problem I doubt it Eating grains isn't that efficient, or in large amounts, healthy, for humans That largely depends on the kind of grains.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:50 AM
3

right, but we're not there. Stop talking about the future as if it is the present.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:40 AM
3

Exclusively grass fed beef is still uncommon
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:35 AM
5

So, what you're saying is it is still more common than not for beef to be fed with crops that require farming, ergo less efficient.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:28 AM
3

Really? You're trying to tell me that most beef farms grass feed their livestock?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:11 AM
3

you mean most farms do that
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:55 AM
1

have you had duck egg, though? I think they're effing fantastic in bakery items
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:41 AM
1

yeah, the eggs we get are duck and chicken eggs from a friend's farm.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:32 AM
1

Still eat dairy and eggs. I don't think I could do vegan, but good on anyone who tries. I just think it's important that every eat what they decide to eat and hope they can make informed decision on what they eat. I will probably go back to eating meat again in a few years, but it will probably be only meat that I've killed myself. That way I can be reasonably sure of the health of the animal before I eat it, and right or wrong, I just think wild animals are probably healthier to eat than hormon…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:06 AM
0

I'm intact, and my parents were from Oregon and California.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:00 AM
5

it would probably be acceptable in /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:58 PM
-1

He/she might be, though I don't personally know him/her and do not have enough information to say that he/she is stupid. Perhaps misinformed, uninformed, or a zealot.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:08 PM
3

It's easier to get nitrogen from the soil, and easier to get carbon from the air, even though air is more nitrogen rich and soil is more carbon rich.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:18 PM
7

Indeed. In fact, meat is so much more inefficient because we have to dedicate land to grow crops to feed the animals, and also dedicate land to raise the animals. The energy return is quite low compare to a more plant based diet.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:17 PM
6

I've felt much better since becoming a vegetarian. Cooking is also much less of a chore since I don't have to be as concerned with making sure meat is cooked well enough, or other sanitary issues that increase due to preparing meat. I'm not morally or ethically opposed to meat. In fact, I love it, but I do like the way I feel since I've stopped eating meat.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:16 PM
1

are you sure it was this one? He had two uploaded, one was the one you posted before, and the other was this one which has redacted information in it. You can see here how he was trying to figure out how to delete the one you originally posted.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 06:23 PM
3

I've been drinking coffee since I was 6, and soda just as long at any time I wanted it. No harm done. If it stunted my growth, then it did me a favor because I'm 6'4.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:15 PM
1

Please link to the redacted version
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:00 PM
0

Please link to the redacted version
/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:59 PM
2

the dude gives his 8 year old kid a pop (albeit caffeine-free/sugar-free) at 9am, and is giving her decaf coffee. That just doesn't sit well with me. Why?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:58 PM
1

http://garytrieste.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/full-federal-lawsuit-12-31-2012.pdf
/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:37 PM
1

please link to this one instead
/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:37 PM
16

. . '.-:-.` ' : ` .-----: .' `. , / (o) \ \`._/ ,__) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:21 AM
1

Are there male reporters in female locker rooms?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:02 PM
1

Is it not a crime in most states to both sell and buy sex?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:55 PM
1

I'm just saying it's an even split between both genders, and therefore neither a male or female crime as a whole, though individually prostitution is more of a female crime and soliciting sex for money is more of a male crime.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:36 PM
1

You know, I said it wrong. What I tried to say, but horribly failed at it, was that of everybody involved (prostitutes and clients) at least 45% of them were male clients and at least 45% of them were female prostitutes. But, now that I've had my coffee, I see even that has a flaw, so perhaps it's better to say that 90% of the clients are male and 90% of the prostitutes are female.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:00 PM
1

but you would agree that it would be fair to say that at least 45% of the prostitutes are women and 45% of the clients are men, right? So, it seems to me that about half of the people breaking the law are women and about another half are men, with about 10% that could be either men or women on either side.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:27 PM
-1

oh, it is absolutely ridiculous to call it a female crime. it's not as if all prostitutes are females, and generally it's an even split between the genders as far as clients/pros go.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:23 AM
9

Actually, a great number of women are taken captive and forced to have sex for money.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:51 PM
4

Slightly o/t, but I got banned from /r/conservative because I replied to someone in /r/Liberal and agreed with them that the mods of /r/conservative are ban happy. Thanks to /u/chabanais, /r/conservative is becoming the new /r/pyongyang
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:24 PM
2

but in the case with the passed out girl it's implied that she was at fault. No, it doesn't. Let's be very clear: in the case of rape and sexual assault, there is no shared fault. Only the perpetrator is at fault. The victim would be at fault just as much as a un-seat belted driver would be for dying after being hit by a drunk driver. There are simple and obvious things both parties could have done to mitigate the risk, but that does not change fault. edit: Oh, and dude, if you're going to ignor…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:32 PM
1

So, when you're raped you aren't robbed of your innocence? You know that's a way to say it, right? Robbed of your innocence? Are we not looking at things in abstract, unrealistic terms now? I mean, we've gone from money suits to trawling around town in your birthday suit. And now we come back to the point. We can't make our environments safe, but we can choose safer environments and make ourselves prepared for unsafe ones.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 11:54 PM
1

Rape, my friend. They can also rob your of your health (assault)
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:20 PM
0

They can rob you of your innocence. As you pointed out, both men and women can be raped. The number of people who don't fall into either of those buckets is so small it's not statistically significant.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:06 PM
2

And most of the time you're not going to die from a car accident, but you still wear a seat belt.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:05 PM
2

I'm sorry but saying, "such and such shouldn't have gotten so drunk that she/he couldn't control his/herself around complete strangers" isn't blaming the victim for getting raped any more than saying "such and such should have worn his/her seat belt or they'd still be alive" is blaming my friend's dad and mom for getting hit and killed by a drunk driver.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:35 PM
1

No, I'm saying that bad things happen, no matter what we do to make an environment where they won't and it is stupid and malicious to try to say that we shouldn't be smart and avoid high risk activities (such as getting passed out drunk around people you don't know...or getting passed out drunk period.)
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:33 PM
0

Are you not in possession of spandex shorts?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:31 PM
0

Tell me about a day that you were without a possession.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:12 AM
1

I can get robbed without having a suit made out of $100 bills too. The point I was trying to make, but apparently whooshed by you was that there are things we can avoid doing that are high risk and it's foolish to do high risk things just because we think others should act better.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:46 AM
1

You're basically arguing that people shouldn't wear seat belts, but instead we should educate people to be better drivers.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:30 PM
0

You don't need a vagina to be assaulted in Baltimore, or anywhere else for that matter. Here's perhaps a better way to present my way of thinking rather than the money suit. When I see comments like this: I'm arguing that the problem isn't the people putting themselves at risk, but the people who pose a threat to the former. Or should we settle with a society where we have to avoid doing specific things because people might take advantage instead of teaching kids that you shouldn't take advantag…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:29 PM
1

Everybody knows that they shouldn't murder. People still murder. Everybody knows that they should steal. People still steal. Teaching people that they shouldn't sexually assault others is fantastic, but people will still sexually assault others. You can idealize a society where education is the panacea for all crime, but at some point you need to wake up and realize that even if that were to happen, it won't be the case in your life time. So stop trying to perpetuate the idea that one shouldn't …
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:00 PM
1

it was /u/ExceptionToTheRule
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:55 PM
3

Here's a recent comment from a feminist: When I'm walking down the street and someone catcalls me or says something crude to me do you know what I wonder? I wonder if they're going to turn around and attack me. I wonder if todays the day I get raped. They've already shown they're interested and they don't care about my feelings or what society says. And then I think to myself, Anyone could do this. But my mind goes to men, men are going to catcall me, they're going to scare me and make me worry …
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:19 PM
1

That's a separate issue. We're talking about saying "it's a bad idea to do blah blah" not "you're stupid because you did blah blah". It's usually not very beneficial to anyone to tell someone what they did wrong. You seem to be arguing against telling people they should refrain from behavior that puts them at greater risk.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:44 PM
1

Should I be able to walk around Baltimore at night wearing clothes made out of serviceable $100 bills? Yes. Is it smart to? Of course note, because people can be criminals. There are a lot of things I should be able to do, but that aren't smart to do. Willfully surrendering one's agency among people you don't know is one of those things that isn't very smart.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:30 PM
2

Exactly. He was forced to kill her just as much as women who are abused are forced to kill their abusers. The interesting thing to watch here is if he is able to get a reduced or commuted sentence, or even a not guilty verdict, because of the alleged abuse he suffered. If they throw the book at him, it will underscore the double standard our justice system has for men and women. Ideally, though, he would get sentenced for murder and so would women in the same situation.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:25 PM
1

most of the settlements are undisclosed as far as I know. Can you find a source that indicates otherwise?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 10:21 PM
0

I appreciate it.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:36 PM
2

simply because the shooter was a woman and the lead recipient was a man doesn't make this a sexual discrimination issue. Further, your assertion that had genders been reversed this would have been a media circus is not supported by anything more substantial than unicorns and butterflies. There are plenty of women who are shot by male officers and it's never mentioned in the news. There are plenty of men who are shot by officers and it is mentioned in the news. It's an excessive or misuse of forc…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:01 PM
0

You might have a point...but you don't.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:53 PM
1

Sorry. I don't have a source other than what I learned though various birth classes and from the people who helped deliver my daughter. It seems self evident, though, that if the mother's life is in danger, then so is the baby's. If you wish to find sources to prove me wrong, then by all means, please do so.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:17 PM
4

Quite often if the life of the mother is in danger so is the life of the child. It is more often the case in these situations that the mother is more likely to survive than the child. Therefor, standard triage protocol goes into effect.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:48 PM
9

Andthat'stheproblem
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:46 PM
6

Abortion is a womens rights issue. No, this is false. Abortion is actually a human rights issue.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:45 PM
6

when slavery was a legal institution in the United States, killing a slave was not murder. The same is true today in regards to killing an unborn child.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:45 PM
2

murder and personhood are both legal definitions in modern times. Abortion is not murder, though it can be argued that it is tantamount to murder.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:43 PM
24

You just want to abuse wymyn
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:42 PM
20

Wait, is this legit? I seem to remember another story where a 34 year old woman raped a 15 year old boy and then won custody and child support Is this story real, or based on this story from the 90s? edit: I've been trying to find a source on this and the best I can find are message board posts or some random sites that don't actually provide any real source. As such, and based on the remarkable similarities to the story I referenced, I am saying it is likely to be fake.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 02:16 AM
6

You're probably pro-abortion, aren't you?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:18 PM
8

There are a lot of reasons. And for the sake of transparency, I am uncircumcised. It is his body and nobody else's. There is no medical need for the surgery. It should be his choice and nobody else's. The pain of circumcision causes a rewiring of the baby's brain so that he is more sensitive to pain later. Circumcision also can cause post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anger, low self-esteem and problems with intimacy source Doctors can screw up circumcisions causing half or parti…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:41 PM
-1

Things tend to be able to stay on a horizontal surface more than a vertical surface.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:42 PM
-2

Actually it's more sanitary to put the lid and seat up
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:05 PM
-2

he*
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:09 PM
-2

I just find it funny that Mr. Garrison exists irl
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:56 PM
1

Wait. I'm confused. Someone who was born male had a sex change operation to become a female and then became a lesbian?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:59 AM
4

Not sure how this belongs in /r/MensRights
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:37 PM
1

Newfies
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:33 PM
1

Was unaware. I've never seen his program. Only thing of his I've seen is the "fuck it, I'll do it live"
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:47 AM
8

Ah. Having never been in the bible belt except for passing through I have no experience with this. My observations were drawn from watching political pundits and politicians.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 12:07 AM
-11

I have yet to observe it. Have you?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:45 PM
-10

That is a typical liberal response in a debate.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:35 PM
16

So, basically what he is saying is that so long as people's houses burn down we shouldn't try to do anything to prevent drownings.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:34 PM
1

unreported rapes shouldn't be included in the statistic
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:00 PM
4

to play devil's advocate, there are fates worse than death and a permanent trauma to one's psyche could lead to a lifetime of suffering that might be worse than a quick death. This is true of many traumas.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:59 PM
13

In a world where killing a child is the logical solution to avoid financial hardship
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:29 AM
-2

no dangerous side effects, except for killing a child.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:28 AM
2

Doesn't work. If I go to a site and something comes up preventing me from reading the content, do you know what I do? I close the tab and never return to that site. It has the opposite effect.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:53 PM
5

I was right there with you until I actually went to the source and was assaulted with a popup ad.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:25 PM
7

this isn't really appropriate for this sub, I don't think.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 04:35 PM
1

Can I get a source for her saying this other than an image macro? Preferably a video or an audio clip or a reputable news provider
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:24 PM
-4

I'm a human. Do I have a right to tell my girlfriend to abort out child? Do I have a right not to pay child support if she doesn't?
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:16 PM
57

By her logic you know we are living in a matriarchal society when being an MRA has a weird connotation.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:53 PM
7

That's because the police say it's a civil matter.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:38 PM
-8

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/22/living/son-do-not-rape-steubenville/index.html?hpt=hp_bn11 Next we should have an article: Raising a girl not to be a whore
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:35 PM
6

Agreed. The only exception I can think of is if the couple if phenomenally wealthy to begin with, but that is almost never the case.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:35 PM
20

I'm so happy my wife and I had a ~$70 wedding on the beach with a few friends. Made life much simpler. We just hit 8 years today.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:24 PM
4

That guy seriously lucked out
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:22 PM
4

She loosed her virginity? Better catch it quick!
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:04 AM
19

When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:21 PM
1

There's a difference between saying 'no' and saying 'I don't want to do this'. Also, in instances where consensual non-consent is in play, it is discussed before hand.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:15 PM
2

If somebody says they don't want sex, that means they don't want sex. Unless an act is shooting a gun or lighting fireworks, words are louder than actions. In fact, unless you're a full retard, language is what we use to communicate.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:34 PM
8

Dude, physical intimacy isn't a fucking water slide that, once you start, you have to finish at a different level.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:36 PM
-1

But even from the way you saw it, just because you make it to 2nd or 3rd base, doesn't mean you're guaranteed or entitled to a home run.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:24 PM
6

I disagree. I interpreted it the same way as GrimChains did.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:03 PM
2

Why? Usually you give a warning before to avoid escalating things. Defending with equal force is not an escalation of the altercation and should not require a warning.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:28 AM
7

You don't think people would do that, do you? Just go on the internet and tell lies?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:13 PM
3

laurel is southern MD? since when?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:25 PM
0

cencorship?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:23 PM
1

IIRC, there's a female quarterback playing high school football. Other than that, there are a few female high schoolers who are kickers
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:57 PM
13

Donna was my favorite
/r/MensRights11/01/13 01:02 AM
2

But discrimination based on sex, race, etc is unlawful
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:30 PM
1

if the doctors refused to perform elective surgeries on black people, I'm sure this rationale wouldn't hold water.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:29 PM
5

combat pay.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:07 AM
0

It's nice to know you think so poorly of both your father and mother to think your father was a fool and your mother a controlling bitch. Honestly, it's people with attitudes like yours that cause a lot of marriages to fail -- though most don't fail in the US these days. You know, it's not often I see true misogyny on this sub, but from you I most certainly have.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:49 PM
2

ah. no worries, mate. I have often fallen victim to not placing the /s tag at the end of a comment.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:42 PM
3

[–]imbignate 0 points 42 minutes ago (1|1) Feminism Equality. FTFY you're going to have to explain how being ordered to pay an amount of child support and alimony that exceeds your gross income is equality.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:13 PM
0

Wow. 9 days of butthurt. Marriage is not just a contract. Having that philosophy is probably why yours and your father's failed.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:05 PM
8

Please do this in another way where you don't show dead service members in their caskets. It is distasteful to use such an image for a political or ideological agenda.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:41 AM
1

No, but I have been known to sleep with my eyes open.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:36 PM
1

That's what I want to know! How could you have failed so miserably!?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:25 PM
1

pointing out how inane your accusation that I was comitting confirmation bias was
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:32 PM
1

you failed
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:49 PM
1

::looks back for question mark:: where did I say it worked for everyone?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:50 PM
1

Hmm. What does making the right decisions have to do with marriage? Is that truly the question you want answered? And please, answer my question first.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:16 PM
1

Everything....and where did you answer my question?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:41 AM
1

where did I say it worked for everyone? Obviously, not everyone is going to make the right decisions, but putting blame on others for their own problems is foolish
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:24 AM
1

especially people who suffer from confirmation bias
/r/MensRights09/12/12 03:36 AM
1

you can choose your partner. I chose mine and we got married within 6 months of knowing each other. We've been happily married for nearly 8 years now.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:10 AM
1

then you have 2/3 of the equation in your power
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:09 AM
1

you can choose your partner, right?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:21 PM
-3

that's your opinion, and it's wrong.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:08 PM
-7

marriage is what you make it. the fact that you look at it merely as a contract is more indicative of how fucked up your perspective is than how fucked up marriage is.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:43 PM
9

Saying "don't get married" to avoid all the issues with alimony and child support is like telling women "don't date men" so they can avoid all the beatings...it makes no sense.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:47 AM
-1

No, but it does make you pretty lame.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:21 PM
1

I'm sorry, but your comparisons lack parity.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:42 PM
2

So are you saying you think children are retarded or whore cunts?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:43 AM
5

that's why it was a chuckle and not a fullout ROTFLMFAO
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:05 PM
37

am I the only one who doesn't think this is a big deal, and actually chuckled a bit?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:57 PM
1

by chance, are you participating in nanowrimo right now?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:55 PM
-2

so, you're a dude.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:16 AM
1

27, here. Never signed up for selective service.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:15 AM
0

But chemically burning a fetus do death is OK? Leaving a child that survived an abortion to die in a closet is OK?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:31 PM
0

But if you're killed instantly, no pain right? So it's morally A-OK.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:07 PM
1

Not true. If I shoot you in the back of the head then you won't even be aware of the danger. ninjaedit: this is all hypothetical. I have no desire to kill anyone.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:03 PM
0

Really? Morally it is better to kill unconscious people? So, I can kill you in your sleep and it would not be murder? Or perhaps just second degree murder instead of first degree murder?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 04:57 PM
0

So it's not wrong to kill someone who is unconscious or can't feel pain? And they're not hurt? Are you fucking kidding me? That's akin to, "I'm not gonna hurt you, I'm just gonna eat you."
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:40 PM
0

I'll agree you're wrong. I have a completely different opinion than yours based on science and common sense.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:09 AM
0

As soon as it is born and can self sustain it's life. Up until that point, it is less than a slave. Your logic is flawed. I have a friend whose daughter was born at just 25 weeks. My daughter was born just a couple days short of 40 weeks. You are saying that when my daughter was 37 weeks along, she was less of a person than my friend's daughter who was born at 25 weeks? Or are neither of them real people yet? My daughter is now 7 months old. She can't feed herself, move around very well, etc. Wh…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:39 AM
1

Personhood is extremely relevant, are you kidding me. No, it is not relevant. It is that kind of thinking that lead to justifying slavery. If we can legally make a human less than a person than that is tyranny, and no worse than slavery. If you want to talk about false equivalencies such as OP points in in the video, then yours is right up there with it. I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong. Slaves were legally not a person. Fetuses are legally not a person. Killing a slave was not mu…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:43 AM
1

Personhood is irrelevant. The idea of humans being people or not people gave justification to slavery. Life is a basic human right.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:01 AM
-2

Abortions kill kids. Vasectomies don't. It's simple.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 09:27 PM
-1

I get that. I really do. But, this post just sounded circle-jerky. Considering where he was posting, the last line, "Why do people not take male rape seriously?" seemed like a circlejerk statement.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:21 PM
-12

there really should be a /r/MensRightsCircleJerk for these kinds of questions
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:53 AM
7

Silly question, but is f that an actual quote or did you make it up to illustrate a point?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:32 AM
1

We won't get rid of our two party system so long as we have a first past the post voting system.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:01 AM
1

because society has a double standard, but it doesn't make discrimination in a private service based business wrong.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:53 PM
–

They're a private company. They can do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 09:19 PM
1

Not from being in the Air Force, no. I do now, however, own 9 guns (6 long, 3* handguns, one of which is an old cowboy pistol and not serviceable). Prior to and since being in the Air Force I already had a respect for firearms that was instilled in me by family and friends.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:00 PM
1

Would it surprise you to know that in the course of my entire military service, the only time I handled a gun was for about 6 hours during basic training?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:11 PM
1

So, my experience as a six year veteran of the United States Air Force and my honorable discharge, in your opinion, make me qualified to own and carry a firearm?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:55 PM
1

Would you say that all veterans who have been honorably discharged from the US or Canadian military should be assumed to possess the required skill and training to own and carry a firearm?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:45 PM
1

All self defense laws do not derive from that, though, as it is a direct quote from a law passed in 1967. But, let's temporarily accept your premise that that is the basis for self defense laws. A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime or in arresting offenders or suspects. "A person may use such force as is reasonable" What does that mean? Does that give every citizen cart blanche to kill anyone in order to prevent a crime or arrest offenders …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:39 PM
1

It is absolutely cultural. American children are taught, depending on where you're growing up, that guns are dangerous and bad, or that guns are the only way to be respected. It's just like abstinence only sex ed, actually. Our culture is so fucked up about guns that when people first deal with guns they don't know what the fuck they're doing unless they've done research themselves. They don't understand how to respect a gun or the consequences of no respect. Because guns are taboo when we're gr…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:32 PM
1

there are about 420,000 assault rifles (fully automatic, or "selective fire") stored at private homes, mostly SIG SG 550 models. Additionally, there are some 320,000 semi-auto rifles and military pistols exempted from military service in private possession, all selective-fire weapons having been converted to semi-automatic operation only. In addition, there are several hundred thousand other semi-automatic small arms classified as carbines. The total number of firearms in private homes is estima…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:14 AM
2

Again, Switzerland has more guns per capita than any western nation. Why are they not the murder capital of the world?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:18 PM
3

Practically everyone in Switzerland has a gun. Why are they not the murder capital of the world?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:18 PM
3

ErasmusMRA wrote: A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime or in arresting offenders or suspects. The use of a gun might be justified in this case since it was a physical attack on life and property. Of course, if he shot the wrong person he would be criminally liable. I'd just like to point out that you are quoting from a UK law (section 3 of the Criminal Law Act 1967) and is there specifically to replace Common Law that states one must retrea…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:16 PM
10

I like my men like I like my coffee: hot, black and bitter.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:15 PM
4

Don't people know that freezing coffee is bad? And, in fact, should be used within about 10 days of opening?
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:14 PM
7

The United States is more extreme in a lot of things than other places. I would argue that the U.S. brand of feminism is the most dangerous in the world and the most rampant.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:24 PM
1

I never said the percentages were equal, but that's still 10%-25% of men who leave their wives, which isn't entirely insignificant.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:10 PM
2

Do you believe it is always the woman who, "cashes out"?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:01 PM
1

It's a principle that is observed through history, yes. It basically states that as one group becomes dominant, another group will surpass them and dominate, until they too are dominated.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:51 PM
2

No. I was just stating an observation that I have made. No matter what, the scales will always be tipped in favor of one group over another. It's essentially the principle of retarding lead.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:08 AM
1

So long as people are involved in any system, it will be fucked up.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 03:26 AM
13

Depends on what you consider recently. We've been married 7 years.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 02:50 AM
17

Am I the only man who enjoys being married?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 01:54 AM
1

That 4 year thing is known as the Close-in-age exemption. Mississippi does not have that.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:03 AM
2

Mississippi has no Close-In-Age Exemption There are no set close-in-age exemptions or "Romeo and Juliet laws" to Mississippi's age of consent. This means that anyone who engages in sexual activity with someone under the age of consent in Mississippi is liable for prosecution, including people only a few years older then their sexual partner and even two individuals who are both under the age of consent.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:54 AM
1

iirc, statutory rape occurs when someone has sex with someone who has not reached the age of consent
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:20 AM
2

the age of consent in mississippi is 16
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:59 AM
2

In some places in the US, 16 is the age of consent...just sayin' edit: in fact, the age of consent in mississippi is 16
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:56 AM
4

Is she saying, "you killed a generation!"?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:15 PM
-2

If I wanted to know what they were talking about, I would subscribe to them. You're as bad as all the folks who just post apple shit in /r/Android all day.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 03:20 AM
-9

Downvoted for the douchebag pundit.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:27 AM
5

It seems interesting to me that the cases I've read about where the boy dies it has always been (as far as I can recall) in a Jewish ceremony and not at a hospital. That said, I am completely against mutilating the body of someone who is not able to consent to it.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:25 AM
–

Best practice is this: if someone's drunk, they can't consent.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 05:53 PM
1

If I buy you a coffee at a cafe, that coffee is not free. Even though you didn't pay for it, someone else did.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:36 PM
0

So..it's not free.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:21 PM
2

I was under the impression that people in the UK paid taxes.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 07:44 PM
8

NHS is not free
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:54 PM
1

And I bet she hopes I do the same
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:59 PM
2

My wife does what she wants, and that's cool with me. She's responsible and I trust her completely.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:45 AM
0

I'm sure there are plenty of gay, non-white, disabled or just-different men who have had to put up with abuse from drunken people, too. So...what do you have against white men?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:33 AM
2

I have breasts and I'm a dude. Will you buy me dinner?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:38 AM
10

Fun story. I have a friend who was studying to be an elementary school teacher. He was in Eugene Oregon and was going out for one of his student teaching gigs. At some point he was talking to the principal who told him that they, nor any other school in the 4J district would hire him because he is a young male and too much of a liability. He ended up switching majors to journalism and last I heard was working in the food service industry on the coast.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 01:54 AM
1

The point was to illustrate that compared to Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh isn't really extreme at all. Have you ever listened to both their shows? Savage is a lunatic.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:32 AM
2

That's not really relevant to someone's position on the political spectrum. In fact, my down-vote of your other comment was my way of telling you I don't think his education has anything to do with the current discussion...but, hey! Thanks for playing!
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:13 AM
3

Just a word of advice...pregnant women have a lot of hormones going through them that they've never really dealt with before. This can cause them to act in a way they wouldn't normally act. There is a definite possibility that her actions are hormonally driven and after she has the kids she may return to sanity. If, in your state, there is some legal reason that you must act before the kids are born, then do that. If, however, there is no harm to your claim of paternity if you wait until after t…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:42 AM
1

It is misogynistic...a misogynist is someone who is misogynistic...
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:33 AM
1

No, my name's Shawn
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:16 AM
0

If Rush is extreme, then what is Michael Savage?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:15 AM
-1

But Limbaugh is usually right.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 01:20 AM
1

it's not my place to say what adults should and shouldn't do with their bodies I agree with this statement. However, choosing to do this for someone who is unable to make their own decision is pretty messed up.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:08 PM
-1

Well, it's not to late! You can still have it done...even though your reasons are stupid, who am I to argue with a druggy?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:51 AM
2

I actually experienced this. I would call my wife crying daily at work. I lost 60 lbs in a couple months and quit my job the day before Christmas Eve (my son was 6 months old at the time). I had no backup job planned. I thought I was going through a severe depression at around the same time my son was born and that the two were unrelated, because only women experience post-mordem right? It happens to men too. I think you mean postpartum depression. post-mordem almost means "after death"
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:08 PM
30

Yes, actually, I am new. That's why I was asking the question.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:14 PM
18

SRS = /r/shitredditsays? Why do we care about them?
/r/MensRights08/04/12 10:33 PM
-2

tl;dw?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:53 AM
1

Katharina?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 10:21 PM
1

What got me is that t wasn't tall enough to be the fourth letter. The h, however, was just enough taller.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:35 AM
1

Hmm. The blue dots you left around the red matched up perfectly with Kath.....
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:07 AM
9

Katherine seems like a jerk. I'm not gonna lie.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 03:27 AM
1

He was ordered to refrain from making statement against his ex. This would be what is called an illegal order. He made a facebook post on his wall without mentioning his wife's name. In fact, they were not even friends on facebook so it wouldn't have shown up on her feed. What the judge did was punishment for using the Bill of Rights
/r/MensRights20/03/12 01:02 AM
3

Who is this and why was he in jail?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:50 AM
3

My wife noticed that you did this in the kitchen and started chuckling. Had to share. Great video, btw.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 11:51 PM
8

JUMPING ON THE GRAVY TRAIN
/r/seduction31/05/11 09:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter