TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rominulala343 Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by rominulala343 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Parasites do function outside their host At certain stages in their life cicle, just like humans.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 03:18 PM
6

Parasytes are considered organisms though
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:56 PM
2

Ok, and does the girl having no choice justify giving the option to kill the unborn?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:38 PM
4

Your snot has human DNA. The skin cells you shed every second has human DNA. The question is not whether it is human, because it 100% is. Not only is it human, it's a human organism. The question is, whether it is a person. Que completely arbitrary distinction between human and person that tries to justify killing human organisms
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:35 PM
7

That is unfortunate Actually, I agree. In fact, why stop at the unborn! People of unheathy origins should not be allowed to opress their betters. They should stay in their class (I heard India had good ideas regarding such organisation). /S
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:45 PM
8

(Despite what many may tell you) pro-lifers usually push against abortion because they think fetuses are humans with equal rights to all other humans (and that said rights don't allow the mother to kill the fetus in this situation). So, if you want abortion illegal in some cases, but legal in case of rape, that means you consider rape babies to have less rights because of their origin (that is rape) and that would mean they are less "valuable"
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:38 PM
4

Ok, and what does it have to do with this?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:21 PM
2

Rape survivors - I understand. They can have it But are the unborn less valuable because of their origin?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:09 PM
8

It's alive, it has human DNA, it's the starting point of babies... should that be protected? It's alive, iIrc it doesn't have the full set of chromosomes a human organism has, meaning it isn't a human. As for it being the starting point of babies, well, that's, in a way, wrong. The fertilized egg is the starting point of babies, in that they are a baby at it's first stage. Sperm is the starting point of babies as much as the father's testicles, or their ancestors, or the Big Bang.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:08 PM
9

Seriously asking, is foreskin the greatest threat to male rights? No, but: we can focus on multiple problems at a time it's downright symbolic of male discrimination. Females are allowed to tear apart humans in the womb because muh bodily autonomy but males can have their genitals violated without their consent. We raise children based on our own experiences as a parent. What worked for me I pass on. How about not repeating the mistakes of the past?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 11:15 AM
10

Not the same guy, but the fetus has human DNA (and that's why they are, unlike a banana, a human life)
/r/MensRights06/09/21 11:11 AM
2

Man, please don't do this. If you do it, she wins. Don't give her that satisfaction. Take a breath of fresh air. Literally. Emotionally detach yourself from this situation. No matter what happens, you can live on.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 08:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter