TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rosconotorigina Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by rosconotorigina on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think this guy is setting up a straw man argument when he talks about patriarchy. I may be wrong, but I don't think when a feminist talks about patriarchy, she means a conspiracy that all men are a part of, but rather the idea that men have greater access to power and that male elites use this power to keep women-- and other men-- down. It's not so much all men have access to power but only men have access to power. I would say that there are still forces in society that cause women to eschew …
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:15 AM
13

Prediction: all the defenders of circumcision are going to say something along the lines of "hurr this just proves that being cut makes me last longer in bed."
/r/MensRights19/11/11 09:09 PM
3

Just because someone likes a certain physical type of woman doesn't mean they only care about appearance. It's like even if I'm crazy about blondes, I'm not going to date a woman who is dumb and treats me poorly just because she's blonde. And if I meet a great woman, I'm not going to reject her because she's a brunette. If I'm with a group of friends trying to meet a girl, I can't tell right away if she's an animal lover or likes to read about current events, but I can tell what color her hair i…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 03:16 AM
3

Legitimately asking, not trying to be a jerk, but isn't there a concept of "men's work" and "women's work" in many different cultures? For example, on farms it seems like from what I've read the women often pitched in for planting and harvesting and household chores, but a lot of the heavy work, plowing the fields, lifting heavy things, herding flocks was done by men, whether the farmer himself or hired farmhands who were exclusively male. Even in tribal societies, you often see men going out to…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:51 AM
1

I think I'm much better off now than I would be as a hunter-gatherer. I'm extremely nearsighted without my glasses, so I'd probably get killed by a saber-toothed tiger while scavenging for bits of corn out of a mammoth turd to stave off starvation.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:32 AM
7

She seemed genuine and sincere to me, especially in her blog post, whereas Paul Elam just comes across as petty and in love with being outraged. My original post was misguided. I have since learned so much about Mens Rights Activists (MRA), a world view I had honestly never considered. I do have the wisdom to see that the broader message of MRA is worthy of attention. Paternity fraud, unfair custody battles, certain child support procedures, false accusations and double standards that plague men…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 01:24 AM
10

I asked her to sit down, and she did. Then I asked her to jump, and she did. Then I asked her to do a flip, and she said no. Then I completely lost my shit and started choking her. What's the lesson here?
/r/MensRights23/10/11 05:18 AM
2

Can somebody give me the tl;dr on the SRS drama? I've been there a few times, they seem pretty high-horsed, I'll admit, but is there anything sinister that I don't realize?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:00 AM
1

I guess it's because it's what they're most familiar with. I think as less and less people get it done, that will start to change.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 12:43 AM
2

As far as what people used to be circumcised for I couldn't give less of a fuck. We're talking about present day. I think that what people used to be circumcised for does matter, because tradition is one of the biggest reasons people are circumcised today. Imagine if nobody had ever heard of circumcision, and then in 2011 some doctor started recommending it to newborns. The only real benefit I see in the post you linked is that the foreskin is frictionless so he can jerk off with it? What about …
/r/MensRights27/08/11 08:55 PM
1

It would be easier to brush your teeth if you removed your lips too. And I'm pretty sure people were doing it long before HIV. If you don't want your penis to be dirty, spend an extra minute washing it in the shower. If you don't want to get HIV, wear a condom and know your partner. There's no reason other than tradition to chop off part of your penis and reduce your sensitivity in the one place where you probably least want your sensitivity reduced. This guy said it better than me.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 07:51 PM
1

this thread Michael Jackson Eating Popcorn.gif
/r/MensRights24/08/11 02:50 AM
3

Well it does come up on reddit now and then, especially on MR. Not so much at the watercooler though :p
/r/MensRights22/08/11 04:20 PM
7

She mentioned circumcision and men being confined to certain specific behaviors based on gender. Both of those things started long before feminism existed.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:46 AM
3

She said Intactivism and the limitations placed on the male gender for expression, as well as the obvious double standards are the reasons I’m here. Sounds reasonable. You said there is, quite honestly, nothing that instills greater passion in me at this time than the destruction of feminism. I've got to say, I'm more in line with her goals than with yours. I think it should be more important to fix actual injustice than to battle against an ideology. If the destruction of feminism is really mor…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:18 AM
25

She did say many or most, not all. And it's not very nice to be so mean when someone is obviously trying to extend the hand of friendship. You may not think that feminism and MR are compatible, but this person does, and there's no reason to jump down her throat about it, you can just agree to disagree. After all, you did ask for her opinion. Just my two cents, not trying to be an asshole :)
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:56 AM
2

Whenever I hear a man saying how glad he is that he was circumcised, I just want to say "I'm glad you enjoy your mangled dick" but I never do because I don't want to be rude.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 04:19 AM
36

Wouldn't it be much better to plan these sort of things based on who needs them at the moment rather than who needed them in the past? Or better yet, have them open to anyone who needs them regardless of gender?
/r/MensRights13/08/11 06:56 AM
3

Both space and spatial are from the Latin word "spatium" which explains how spatial got the 't.' ========* THE MORE YOU KNOW
/r/MensRights11/08/11 06:02 AM
1

Because it's taking a newborn baby and cutting off part of its penis for no reason.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 03:19 PM
15

Coffee has two 'e's.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 04:27 AM
4

Yeah, why would you have a separate part of the brain for analyzing humans and then straight up not use it on about 50% of humans? EDIT: Though I guess they are looking at pictures and a picture of a human is technically an object.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 03:09 PM
3

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33956-2005Jan24.html Look at the book described in this article
/r/MensRights21/06/11 03:09 PM
7

Men are a bunch of lambs that obediently go to slaughter. Like the Jews went to the gas chamber. But it is worse then the Jews in WW II ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights20/06/11 02:47 PM
4

Except there is no evidence that what you wear affects your chances of being raped. None. In fact, there's only evidence to the contrary--rapists tend to prey on easy targets, women who look like they won't fight back. Which usually means quiet, shy, conservatively dressed women. I think you're right, but it's still no reason for people to get so mad. If somebody says "I think women who dress provocatively are attracting rapists' attention and may be putting themselves at risk," I wish more peop…
/r/MensRights10/06/11 03:10 PM
2

Nobody really knows why people do this in English http://www.wisegeek.com/why-are-boats-called-she.htm
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:11 AM
2

He watches pornography in which women are depicted. Let me get this straight: Straight porn= rape Lesbian porn= rape Gay porn= not rape?
/r/MensRights20/05/11 02:08 PM
23

I wouldn't go as far as to call it rape, but to misrepresent one's self in order to pursue a sexual relationship is definitely an asshole move. If I made myself appear to come from a rich family and seduced a woman and only after we had sex did I tell her I was actually thousands of dollars in debt, that would make me an asshole. Sure, it shouldn't matter to her how rich I am, but I know that it probably does matter to her, and I also know that by portraying myself in a way that I am not will ma…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:41 AM
2

Under your scenario, what would happen if a pregnant woman claimed that her partner wanted a baby while the partner said that they had a verbal agreement to always use condoms, but one must have had a hole? What would happen if a pregnant woman said that her partner wanted to have a baby and the partner said that she told him she was on the pill? Would you really just tell him tough luck, you shouldn't have trusted the woman you loved?
/r/MensRights25/02/11 04:29 AM
1

In social animals like humans, sex also serves social functions. It can reinforce social ties, solve conflicts, even be used as a bargaining chip. Ignoring that, to say that because the evolutionary purpose of sex is reproduction, all sex acts should be seen as primarily reproductive acts is committing a naturalistic fallacy. You're taking an "is" statement and making it an "ought" statement. It's like saying "humans evolved to eat nuts and berries and the occasional rotting carcass, so modern h…
/r/MensRights25/02/11 04:23 AM
2

The problem then is that it's his word against hers, unless people start signing contracts every time they have sex. An unscrupulous woman could start a relationship with a man, tell him she's on the pill, get pregnant, tell the judge he never used condoms and said he wanted to get married and have a family. Now he has to give her money for the rest of his life, all for what he thought was a casual fling. Then again, if a man had the right to say no thanks to supporting any child he didn't want,…
/r/MensRights25/02/11 04:08 AM
21

Get married
/r/MensRights21/02/11 02:39 AM
3

I've noticed that gender studies is the only social science where disagreeing with established opinion makes you a bad person. For example, if a historian has a radically different view of a certain event, his or her colleagues might say that he or she is not interpreting the evidence properly. That historian might be considered foolish, but not any worse of a person. But it seems like in gender studies, if you disagree you're at best a tool of the patriarchy and at worst an oppressor.
/r/MensRights24/12/10 01:28 PM
29

Exactly. It's one thing to assume somebody is innocent until proven guilty, but by assuming that his accusers are liars until proven otherwise you're doing the exact same thing to them that MRAs complain about when it is done to accused rapists.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 05:51 PM
1

This one always gets me.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 01:50 PM
4

Well do consider that although this was posted in men's rights it was downvoted without mercy.
/r/MensRights16/09/10 11:26 AM
2

I'd say that men have more freedom to not live up to expectations regarding appearances than women do, but suffer from high expectations in other ways. For example, when a woman "acts like a man," shows competitiveness or aggression, she is often praised for being a takes nothing from no one go getter. Whereas if a man is sensitive and emotional, he is likely to be judged harshly by males and females alike. tl;dr: I think men get off easier when it comes to appearance but women get off easier wh…
/r/MensRights06/09/10 11:26 AM
2

Please don't ban anyone who's not spamming. If they're trolls, they'll just get downvoted. If they really mean the things they say, maybe a thoughtful response from another redditor will cause them to reexamine their opinions, whereas banning them will just make them think that MRAs are a bunch of circlejerking crybabies who can't listen to dissenting ideas. Even if the poster is not convinced, allowing those posts to stay up will show other readers the kind of crappy, ignorant attitudes that ma…
/r/MensRights23/07/10 02:32 AM
1

Zeus and Poseidon could exist, in that I can't search the entire universe and prove that they don't, but odds are that they are fictional characters created by ancient people, so I'm going to live my life with the assumption that I'm not likely to be marooned by Poseidon or smote by Zeus. You probably feel the same way, and I bet you wouldn't say that you are agnostic when it comes to those two gods.
/r/MensRights02/07/10 02:16 AM
4

Human incisors are clearly designed to eat animal flesh, but there are those who choose for whatever reason to go against their biology and eat only plants. Should this be considered morally unacceptable?
/r/MensRights06/06/10 01:05 PM
6

How can I be sure they don't circumcise him? Here's how it went down when my son was born seven months ago: My wife was really paranoid that they were going to circumcise him when we weren't there so she made me promise not to leave his side. Not that I would have anyway, but it turns out that wasn't an issue at all. The only time he ever left the room was for a quick blood test and they had no problem with me coming along. Right after he was born the doctors were tending to my wife and the nurs…
/r/MensRights19/05/10 01:31 PM
3

I use the analogy cutting off your lips to make it easier to brush your teeth.
/r/MensRights19/05/10 01:03 PM
17

Masterfully put. The only thing I can add is that I'm twenty four, uncut, and no woman has ever given me crap about it and I've never been teased in the locker room. I was nervous about it when I started getting serious with girls, but I soon realized that the only problem was in my mind, they didn't really care once they realized how it worked. I think it was more common to leave boys intact when I was a kid than when my parents were kids and it's even more common now than when I was a kid, so …
/r/MensRights21/04/10 12:36 PM
6

The statistics tell you what is happening, but they don't explain why. People can believe that men are inherently violent and aggressive and stupid, or they can believe that society encourages men to behave this way. I wouldn't risk losing my job over it. My advice would be to prove the article wrong by letting your coworkers see that you are responsible, intelligent, and not the type to be bothered by little things. tl;dr: haters gonna hate.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 08:07 PM
3

divorce is initiated by mothers in more than two-thirds of cases - especially when children are involved shouldn't this be 'women' instead of 'mothers?'
/r/MensRights17/02/10 06:05 AM
6

How to convince people that Men's Rights is a worthy cause: Imply that women in third world nations deserve to be sexually assaulted. Use the word cunt. ???? Profit!
/r/MensRights07/02/10 04:09 PM
7

I think it's best to let the loonies spout their loony and not dignify it with a response. I mean, these are a handful of angry ladies, but really, what's the worst they can do, hurt your feelings? They're an embarrassment to thinking people of any gender. Meanwhile, actual harm is being done every day by things like biased child custody laws, and a lot of people are oblivious. I think this subreddit would be put to better use by discussing things like that and helping other people to see that p…
/r/MensRights22/01/10 09:30 PM
4

It must have worked. He lived to like 85.
/r/MensRights18/11/09 05:45 PM
11

In order for there to be equal rights, there need to be advocates for every side. So I don't think feminism needs to go away. That being said, I think we hear and give a lot more attention to feminist issues than we do men's rights. When a woman finds out that she gets paid less than men who do the same job, that's front-page news, and it should be. But when a man is denied a job as a teacher or nurse or babysitter because of his gender, where's the outcry? When I walk into the store I see pink …
/r/MensRights14/06/09 06:23 PM
4

I've found women interested in the same books I am on multiple occasions. I'd say that adult men and adult women probably have more similar tastes than do little boys and little girls. Also, it seems from the article that this program was in response to a problem of boys not reading. The teachers judged that they would be more interested if the club was boys only.
/r/MensRights11/04/09 02:37 AM
10

I think it's a great idea. The school saw that a certain group of students was falling behind in a certain area, and came up with a creative way to fix the problem. If boys start to fall behind, focus on helping the boys. If girls start to fall behind, focus on helping the girls. It should be common sense.
/r/MensRights11/04/09 02:33 AM
5

At least the violence against children that results in the death of the child.
/r/MensRights04/09/08 07:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter