| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Q4W: Would you consider a "waste of time" a long term, committed, monogamous, non-cohabitating, kidsfree, relationship with a guy with no prospect of marriage?I dont think so. I'm not sure about the non-cohabitating part, but I guess it could work out. Currently I'm in a happy relationship, we dont plan to marry or have children, but we do live together. I wouldn't call it a whole package if we add non cohabitating. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/11/19 11:33 AM |
| 3 | It's practically the year 2020: does the guy still need to "win her over"?Relationships don't work like basic economy textbook. We are complex beings, with feelings, emotions, needs, instincts, dreams, fantasy. We don't go around cold calculating who would be the best partner, keeping notes and scores, willing to dump our current partner if better option appears. Heck, contrary to main-stream economy (and in agreement with behavioral economy) we usually dont even do groceries like that. I met my current SO on Tinder, we were both looking for sth casual, but over month… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/11/19 06:47 PM |
| 2 | It's practically the year 2020: does the guy still need to "win her over"?Maybe not for you. For many people it can appear later. People are different, we have different ways of interacting with people, feeling attraction, beginning to feel it and developing this feeling. For you the strongest attraction is when you meet someone, I get it. Probably there are are many people like you. Nevertheless there are also many people who have it different. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/11/19 06:35 PM |
| 1 | Feminists be likeOh, hey, that's cool :) Still, I wonder if it will appear on mramemes... | /r/MensRights | 30/09/19 12:41 PM |
| 1 | Feminists be likehttps://snew.notabug.io/r/askfeminists This is amaizing, how could I be on reddit and having conversations like that and didn't know it exists? <facepalm> I judge "what has been removed" on "what posts I stumbled upon and then they disapeared", I didn't know there is a way to retrieve them. Thanks, this is really interesting. Is there a way to tell if a post was removed by a mod or by a OP themselves? What does "[removed by (THIS MAY NOT ACTUALLY BE REMOVED!!!)]" under every removed post means? … | /r/MensRights | 30/09/19 12:39 PM |
| 1 | Feminists be like> You kind of prove my point here, that there were questions deleted and users banned/blocked. Yes, I said it in my first answer to your comment. I know there are posts getting removed, but if it was only because of the topic they talk about you wouldn't find any posts on that topic, because they would all be removed. I follow it from around May, I think. That might be too short, I agree. However that is enough to see some posts that I would remove myself. Posts written with the pure intention o… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/19 11:54 AM |
| 2 | Feminists be likeOh, yeah, that's the problem of basically any ideology or group. IMO the angry and the stupid are usually the loudest ones, so sadly they tend to shape our ideas on what the group they claim to represent is about. It's similar with MRA. If you don't read actual MRA stuff, but just sit in your bubble and occasionally read "MRA" post that popped in your feed there is a chance it is there because it is stupid / hateful, and someone screenshoted it and now shares it with the world out of outrage, or… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/19 11:45 AM |
| 1 | Feminists be likeI can try to answer to this in more details in a couple of hours, when I get back from work and can link some more posts. Don't have much time to do it now. Short version answer: > Where are the questions challenging the pay-gap myth? Could you just type "pay-gap" or "wage-gap" in their search engine? You will find lots of questions like "how do we close pay-gap", but also "does pay-gap" exist", "do you believe in pay-gap", "what about reverse pay'gap" and so on. > Where are the questions challe… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/19 11:27 AM |
| 1 | Feminists be likeThank you, I will surely read this! I edited my post to include the promised links. I also encourage to at least look through them. I won't comment on what you linked in details because I'm at work and don't have much time to read now, so I will have a closer look in a couple of hours. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/19 10:57 AM |
| 0 | Feminists be likeYou can see many questions there that challenge the feminist narrative. What gets blocked or banned is posts that are utterly direspectful and don't seem to come from good will. Quite often I find there a question like "Why feminists do this and that??", some feminists try to answer that, prove that we don't actually do that, or that there are some nuances to that, and OP basically just ignores the answers, answers to them by finding some quote that can be misinterpreted when taken out of contex… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/19 10:50 AM |
| 1 | Feminists be likeHow is this feminist? I don't want to defend feminism movement in all its aspects; I realise many of you dont like us and you have all the rights to feel that way. Feminism is certainly not without a sin. There is certainly a lot of ways we could improve, especially when narrative around men is concerned. But this is not the case. Feminists believe that men are normal human beings. With feelings, complex needs and so on. We actively battle this stupid belief that men think only about sex or that… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/19 10:26 AM |
| 2 | Another example of why Menslib is for spineless pussies. They are too afraid to talk about one of the most important men's issuesThank you for reply. The part about nerve endings really convinces me, that's something I've never heard yet seems very important. I'm not about to forbid adult people who may want to get it done but I'm not going to just say that I'm just okay with that either. I'd advice anyone who even considers undergoing such a procedure to not only think twice but really consider why they are doing it and really look into what they are giving up. It's still their bodies though. However for kids, nu uh. The… | /r/MensRights | 03/09/19 09:07 PM |
| 1 | Another example of why Menslib is for spineless pussies. They are too afraid to talk about one of the most important men's issuesYes, the link would be great, thank you! That sounds awful, I'm really sorry it happened to you. It is outrageous how many parents decide to do it to their children. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/19 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Another example of why Menslib is for spineless pussies. They are too afraid to talk about one of the most important men's issuesThank you for your reply. That sounds awful. It's sad that on wikipedia they have a whole section about benefits, including actually benefits for health like decreased risk of some infections or even cancer. Then there is much smaller section about negative effects, and there there is some vague sentence about possible infections. Maybe it would be a good idea to edit it to share this knowledge; I think that's where most people go when they seek for some information, and they will certainly get … | /r/MensRights | 03/09/19 08:23 PM |
| 2 | Another example of why Menslib is for spineless pussies. They are too afraid to talk about one of the most important men's issuesHey there, genuine question. The topic of male mutilation is not very popular here in Poland, as far as I know if you're not Jewish your parents wouldn't think of it. About female mutilation I know mostly because of the "Desert flower" film; I did some research then, it horrified me, but I did ignore the male mutilation part; guilty as charged. Now when I try to do my homework I've got to admit I find very little. On wikipedia it's mostly either positive effects, or "there is not sufficient data… | /r/MensRights | 03/09/19 07:55 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter