TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

roskybosky Archive

View 0 posts and 368 comments by roskybosky on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

True. Most people switch back and forth, depending on the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:52 PM
0

Single moms? Over 30? Low BMI? No plastic surgery? No feminists? Fellas, I ask you, who’s left? What is the problem with any of the above characteristics? This reduces your dating pool to, um, three people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:20 AM
3

What does this have to do with the question. I’m talking about systemic bias, not killing yourself to put another hamburger on the table. And I have to wonder where this idea even comes from-dangerous jobs??
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:18 PM
6

I think what women are saying is, we have the burden of childbirth as a natural function. Everyone has looked at women as appendages of men for 8,000 years, because men can’t give birth. Women have to do it for them. Breaking out of the stereotype of ‘housewife’ is an enormous burden that women are still working to overcome. (It’s like assigning every baby boy that’s born, the job of insurance salesmen. …’he’s going to be a great insurance salesman! I can tell…’) I think women in this debate are…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 04:05 PM
7

For most women, in most places, there were many fewer opportunities. Let’s not pretend it was the same. So many actually emerged out of the cloudy soup of sexism that I’m surprised to this day.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 02:47 PM
1

That’s my point. If you are only “visual” when it pertains to naked women, well, you’re not really visual. Women have more of an eye for balance, composition and color, for the most part. (Although, I would imagine designers of automobiles are mostly men.)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:53 PM
5

That’s not the point. The point is -if you are not responsible for the birthing and raising of children (as women are) your life is uninterrupted and more attuned to the business of the outside world. Even with the handicap of childbirth, women were also discoverers, inventors, scientists, and thinkers going back to Aristotle. In spite of all the roadblocks that female humans deal with. If you believe men did it alone, you are mistaken.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:49 PM
2

Exactly my point. If men are truly visual creatures, they WOULD be into these endeavors. If they are visual only when presented with breasts and butts, they are only claiming to be ‘visual’ as an excuse to leer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:39 PM
9

Ask Hypathia. She would know. And, that’s not the point. Before birth control, how many women do you think had the time or energy for anything like that? I am most surprised at how many women WERE great thinkers. The list is long and astonishing, what was accomplished in spite of having zero encouragement or even a place to study. Even YOU must know women’s achievements are absent from history books, or attributed to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:33 PM
3

It’s an advantage to have people come to you, but the downside is, you may wait forever. If you approach other people, at least you are the active one making the move, but, you get shot down more. That’s it. Pick your poison.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:46 PM
3

This is another debate, but are men really visual? Not too many are interior designers or flower arrangers, not many into clothing, or notice certain elements of their environment. It seems women are the visual people, into composition and design, color and balance.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:08 PM
10

I always ask how many children did these ‘builders of civilization’ give birth to and raise while they were busy splitting the atom. If your life is uninterrupted with pregnancy and child rearing, well, yeah, you collaborate and build things. They seem to overlook this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:02 PM
3

I never hated my position in the hetero world. I never felt like ‘prey’ either. Because I’m not. There are ways to go about talking to women. One is vulgar and creepy, and one is polite and respectful. We prefer the polite version. Women don’t dislike their position, we just want to be approached with kindness and respect. That’s it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:47 PM
4

But still no real power. Just fringe benefits of being pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:01 PM
1

Sexual power (attractiveness) gets you more choices of partners, because you might have a larger field to choose from. But other than that, unless you want to compromise your dignity, there’s not much power involved. Someone who is hardly attractive can have a better job, more money, travel the world, get into med school, and have many more opportunities than a woman who is only beautiful. She is in an aristocracy of beauty, but it doesn’t bring real power.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:56 PM
4

The main factor is there IS no obstacle. Everyone expects men to be in certain places. A woman walks in and it’s unusual, weird, can-she-do-what-we-do kind of thing. Have you ever accidentally wandered into the brassiere section of a department store? That can be the feeling a woman has when entering a man’s field. The absence of gender bias (for men)is a huge advantage in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:21 PM
2

Wherever women are, we have been at this for roughly 50 years. Men have been at this forever. There are still hills to climb, bias to overcome, and mental gymnastics to practice in order to achieve the highest levels of any particular field. And, most people hire someone else to fix things for them. We can’t all be experts. And, if you wanted to make the perfect lasagna for guests, would you ask your oil-changing dad? No. You’d go to mom. We all have our areas of expertise.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:01 PM
7

“Treat em mean, you’ll have a lonely peen”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 01:51 PM
2

She doesn’t necessarily have to be younger. She’s just successful. It’s my experience that plenty of men have jumped on the money bandwagon and insist on a wife that earns real money.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:58 PM
3

Maybe not in People magazine, but plenty of professional women get with blue collar guys. There are many more men in the trades than women, and it’s likely some will wind up with women in corporate life. No big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:55 PM
2

So, you’re saying that a woman who is halfway through med school is somehow more valuable than a woman who is a physician with her own practice. Can you see how crazy this sounds?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:31 PM
2

Only to very narrow people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:51 PM
1

A ‘drop off’ according to who? RP guys who’ve been on 2 dates? Any person who is established, owns a home, makes decent money, has had a few hard knocks, is always a better partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:50 PM
-2

If the older person is a good soul, it works out fine. While in my 30s, everyone who asked me out was younger, sometimes by 10 years, and it was a nice feeling compared to an older guy. My husband is younger, and I just enjoyed the change. But that’s just me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:46 PM
–

Feminism is only one thing: logic. Because logic is not applied to gender roles, we think they are normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:04 PM
-3

What I mean is-the woman deals with sexism and gender roles in the relationship. If she has that, PLUS, she’s younger and less established, it’s a double whammy. The woman being older balances it out for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:49 PM
1

Where my summer house is located, there has not been a death from a black bear in the last 100 years. (well, a baby was killed about 40 years ago, who was left in a stroller) This is in upstate NY. We have a bear hunting season, and they can be quite large.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:45 PM
-1

How is that a contradiction? I have lived this. Being the older partner gives you weight and credibility in a relationship. If the woman is younger, you have sexism AND age working against you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:35 PM
7

Oh, stop. Women are more than ‘youth and beauty’. When you fall in love, you love the person, and, someone who is established is sooooo much easier to deal with. Can you see a 21 year old at a charity dinner? Omg.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:33 PM
1

Your value increases with wisdom and experience and independence. It is a great relief to be in a relationship with someone who has arrived.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:30 PM
-2

I think if the woman is older, it makes for a more egalitarian relationship. An older woman has more power in the dynamics of the couple, and you are not at so much of a disadvantage as when the man is the older one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:07 PM
10

Men over the age of 40 ( in some studies it is 35) are 6 times more likely to have a child with a neurological problem, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism and others. Even though men manufacture sperm all of their lives, the sperm become defective when the man is older, and produce more miscarriages and birth defects.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:04 PM
1

It’s a feeble attempt at humor. A brown bear is dangerous. A black bear is not. So, I would ask, ‘What kind of bear?.’ But, I have bears on my property, and everyone is always saying, ‘but they’re only black bears…’
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:09 AM
4

Of course. I just get so tired of everybody ranking on aspects of being female (oh, my period. oh, we have to have babies, oh, we have to be thin…. and on and on.) We have power. We have so much power that the culture kept trying to suppress it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:03 AM
5

No. You don’t have to have children if you don’t want them. I am generalizing to counterpoint OP who has a laundry list of bad aspects of having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:58 PM
1

They never specify what type of bear. A brown bear will kill you. A black bear will run away.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:38 PM
10

Women have always known that there are certain downsides to childbirth, as there are for everything in life. However, because men can’t reproduce, we consider them disposable, which is why we send them off to war to be killed at random. One less man is no big deal. We don’t need that many. Being able to create human people in your body makes every woman important. It is the greatest human super-power that exists, and gives every woman a place in the world. Men don’t have that. They are not as gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 02:35 PM
2

You can still have affection for someone who has been and gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:54 PM
1

Everybody has to follow their own heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:51 PM
1

These people would have never made it through the hippie days, that’s for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 02:18 PM
1

If they are all into casual sex, they are ALL sluts. Although, other people’s opinions should never affect anyone’s healthy sex life, don’t you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 02:16 PM
2

I have never had a bad breakup, and somehow, my old boyfriends meld into my life family. I hardly think of them as anything but friends. So many have already died, the ranks are thinning out.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 02:11 PM
4

I think Op is dissecting human relationships in a very basic way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 01:43 PM
1

I’ll go even more basic. If you are not born with a uterus, you have to coerce someone who has one to procreate with you. Women own the factory. If you want the advantages of sex and procreation, you must bring something to the table. As long as men cannot give birth, they will be in the position of catering to women. This, in an extremely basic, non-emotional or loving way. Just basic mechanics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 01:41 PM
6

You’re seeing it in a sexual context. People move on, marry others, have kids, but still remain friends with their college or HS crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 12:57 PM
5

Or if the attraction has been and gone years ago, and now you’re just ‘family.’
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 12:55 PM
1

I’m new here, but it seems the RPs just disagree with any kind of truth or logic. They are so indoctrinated they can’t see anymore. This is sad, but they also sound very young. When will they come to their senses? Hopefully before it’s too late and they spent their life going down the wrong path.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:39 PM
2

I think RP is confused by social customs being different for everyone, so they tried to come up with “definite factors” regarding women, when there aren’t any. No one would care about this, only most of the opinions are disparaging, biased, and just plain incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 01:19 PM
1

Not really. In all of these inane arguments, no one ever mentions pregnancy, childbirth, childrearing, and food manufacturing. These responsibilities pull women out of public life. If men had all of the above on their to-do list, do you think they’d have been tinkering around with airplanes and lab chemicals? Of course not. Women have made numerous discoveries and inventions, and it’s a wonder we even accomplished those, with society telling us our sex organs would shrivel and die if you worked …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:53 PM
1

I would believe it if I ever saw any evidence of it in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 10:26 AM
11

Red pill is a desperate attempt to find some kind of unmovable social rules that defines relationships across the board, for all people. And, it is an impossible feat to accomplish. Because all people are different, all lives are different, all experiences are different. To categorize humans is a losing battle. Red pill will be crying down alleyways forever trying to establish a comfortable social dogma. It can’t be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 04:02 AM
1

I have read women are 5 points ahead, but, even 5 points is no big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:55 AM
1

Oh. The big bugaboo. Use the word “emotional” to try to dismiss a stronger logic. We’ve heard it all before. It means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:53 AM
1

Yes, but men can’t give birth and women can. Women have 2 jobs to do in a marriage. If you don’t have a uterus, you must bring something else to the table. It’s very simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:38 AM
1

In about 16% of marriages, the wife earns more than the husband. I don’t see anyone fainting over it. Those women weren’t “hypergamous” and that’s a pretty big number.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:19 PM
1

This from TIme magazine 2012- There are many possible reasons that women finally surpassed men in IQ after a century of falling behind, according to Flynn, who is writing a book about IQ and gender. One theory is that women have always been capable of scoring higher but, because of discriminatory gender socializing, never realized their own potential. Gender-based differences in education, upbringing and social roles have historically set the bar lower for women. “This improvement is more marked…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:06 PM
1

Saying men are smarter than women is like saying ‘my dad can beat up your dad’. Ridiculously banal and arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:57 PM
0

Are you very young? If so, that makes sense. Once again, you need to get out of the internet manosphere because you have lost your logic by immersing yourself in a tangle of fearful and biased opinions. Please, read a real book someday.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:50 PM
1

I think ‘oppression’ in feminism has 2 branches: brainwashing girls from birth to squelch ambition, and systemic factors that hinder women in culture and commerce. It can be subtle and unnoticed, so it doesn’t surprise me men don’t always recognize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:59 PM
3

They are repeated over and over. Same phrases.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:54 PM
2

Perhaps men realize that they are more disposable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:53 PM
1

The bible is a sexist fantasy. I don’t know where you ever got the idea that men are more intelligent, but, men tend to believe anything that flatters them. You are either very young or very naive. If men could give birth, they would be relegated to home life and the care of children. It’s difficult to split the atom when you have 4 screaming kids waiting to be fed. If you can’t fathom how childbirth caused a major chasm between the lives of men and women, then I question your intelligence. AND …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:45 PM
3

1 in 700 people has an IQ over 145. Not that rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 12:40 PM
3

Men and women are of the same intelligence. Women surpass men in certain areas. Strength is a moot point. We don’t discriminate against small or weaker men. The entire difference between men and women is-men can’t give birth. They are incapable of reproducing on their own, which leaves them free from the interruptions of childbirth and raising children. They can live as a useless drone, or they can find an occupation. And, if you investigate, plenty of women were essential in forming our civiliz…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 12:35 PM
2

To me, just the opposite. I might pay if I don’t want a gift from him. If I like him, I will accept the gift of the cost of the date.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 12:28 PM
6

Most people are in the middle, lots of people have IQs of 140-150. And, you don’t have to be smart to be good at something. Yes-more men are lunatics. And more men are geniuses, or so they say. You don’t have to be a genius to be a leader. But it helps if you are free from constant childbirth. Thats the reason men have been in positions of power. The women’s movement coincided with The Pill. When you control the birth rate, you make progress. If you’re not capable of giving birth, well, you have…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 05:04 AM
1

We’ll be fighting that tradition for a few more decades. Do you begrudge paying on a date?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 04:53 AM
1

It’s not that rigid. There’s still courtesy in the world. Whomever wants to pay can do it. Money is not the only currency in life. There’s company, favors, conversation, a shoulder for whatever you have going on… It would be a sad place if I gave 2 dollars and thirty seven cents and you felt obligated to do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 03:45 AM
2

But, dating is uneven risk. The woman is taking the risk in several ways by getting in a car with a man. In starting a relationship, in risking pregnancy, she’s the pickier person in the couple. That she should also pay to expose herself to risk is kinda nutty, if you ask me. It’s nice to chip in down the road, but in the beginning? I don’t think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:07 PM
1

I don’t see what paying for a date has to do with a political stance. Most men that I dated outearned me dramatically, and would cringe if I ever tried to pay. They’d be insulted. If you are both broke, that’s different.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:03 PM
2

Half of my dating life happened in New York, the other half in Dallas, TX. I’m not exactly sure what you’re trying to say with comparing women who would pay for half a date to women who would sleep with someone within a month of dating. Are you saying it is the same group?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 07:57 PM
8

Splitting the bill on the first date usually means she doesn’t like you and doesn’t want to mislead you. Sex after 30 days (depending on how often you see each other) is a ridiculous measurement to even think about. If you are going to decide to move onto sex, it may take longer than 30 days, but you basically go with when you are sure you want to-could be a month, could be 3 months. “How long you’re willing to wait” implies that somebody is in it for the sex, and the sex should be a by-product …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:55 PM
1

I met many people that I wound up dating in dance clubs. One is still my insurance guy! Live music is great, too, if you like the band.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:32 AM
1

Dancing all night is so much fun-good workout, too. I met so many nice people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:29 AM
2

I’m in Dallas. Greenville Ave. is packed with clubs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 02:23 AM
1

But women like the company of a good man. We like what they do, but we love their company and conversation and just them. It’s not all impersonal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 11:15 PM
2

In Dallas, the nightlife was plentiful and cheap and so accessible. All the clubs are on one long road, the dance floor would be packed, and I met lots of people at these places. Not for a ONS, but for long friendships. I still know some people from those days, so much fun.(But I love to dance)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 11:03 PM
3

I used to go to clubs to dance. I love to dance, and so do lots of other women. If you are a good dancer you can meet people that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 10:57 PM
1

BUT, more violent crime happens to men, and many women, myself included, enjoy being pregnant and look forward to meeting their child.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:54 AM
1

Since when? These are typical things to do. It’s a very common ploy for a woman to buy tickets for an event, and tell a guy she has two tickets to whatever. I’ve done that (but the tickets were a birthday present)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:52 AM
1

But, many times the woman pushes toward the man. ‘Come over for dinner, I have tickets to a concert…how about a picnic” Depending on who likes who, it can go either way. If you are trying to get someone to like you who isn’t interested, then that’s a different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 08:52 PM
2

You know, there aren’t all these contrived formulas for human mating. You meet someone, you like them, they like you, and you see if it can be a permanent thing. sometimes it works, but if it doesn’t you move on. How else can it be? All this chatter about testing, putting in the work, and all of this talk sounds like people who are trying to analyze relationships under one umbrella, which is silly. They are all different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:26 PM
5

Well, I know that parents go to great lengths to keep their kids associating with the same kind of people. Horses, show-jumping, country clubs, tennis lessons, Hamptons rentals, charity dinners, debutante balls, etc. The kids know they are expected to find a mate who understands the lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:21 PM
4

I have a multi-millionaire cousin whose family is well-known, a woman, who married a lifeguard! So there are exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:15 PM
3

I was half joking. Families usually want their sons and daughters in law to be somewhat like their family, so their home will be nice, the kids will be nice, the in-laws will be nice, etc etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 11:41 PM
6

Okay-Yes-I’ll give you that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 10:25 PM
5

But it would make a funny movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 08:44 PM
3

I think red pill guys just try to find a simple formula that they can understand. Society, with all its variety, is confusing and random. I think they try to come up with some basic ‘rules.’ But, rules aren’t people. We are all exceptions to the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 08:05 PM
1

This is all true.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 08:01 PM
15

If he’s looking for a wife, she has to be from his type of background in order to fit in. She has to have some elegance and class, and education, and be sophisticated. You can’t bring a waitress home to mumsey.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 07:58 PM
11

I agree. Wealthy people are more comfortable around their own kind because they have similar homes, cars, vacation spots, etc. If you are around mid or lower class people, you can’t exactly talk about your house in Saint Bart’s, or your new Beamer. You can’t bring certain people there because they would stare, goggle-eyed, at everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 07:56 PM
3

But you had better be an attractive, eligible person from another wealthy family if you want to marry that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 07:51 PM
8

Good luck being from a middle class family and ever meeting anyone wealthy. You might meet someone who earns a good salary, but rich? No. The rich isolate themselves and stick to other rich people. Most men date women who are about their level of attractiveness. And, many younger men are dating women who are 7-10 years older. Some women who are 30-35 have really found themselves and attract guys of all ages. I did. I wasn’t used to it, but I liked the dynamics of that type of relationship. Red p…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 07:49 PM
3

They have their own type of needle. I have mine. What’s perfect for one woman isn’t perfect for another.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 07:33 PM
7

In the end, you have to find a PERSONALITY that fits with yours. Nobody marries a rich, handsome guy if he’s overbearing or annoying or has strange ideas about women. Everyone tries to find a personality that they can tolerate and enjoy for a lifetime. All the money and looks in the world will never overcome living with an asshole, and being locked in a relationship with one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:35 PM
71

If you notice, wealthy people tend to marry into other wealthy families. They swim in the same pond, and meet their spouses at the country club or tennis court. You don’t see wealthy men or women out in clubs or at the bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:30 PM
5

Leadership? Are you kidding? Who in the world needs “leadership?”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:27 PM
11

But that’s the same for women. You both give up certain things to be together.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:26 PM
1

Yes. I have a very equal relationship with my husband, but it took years to find him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:24 PM
7

If you do, you’re labeled a slut. The man has to show the woman that he’s worth it. I’m speaking marriage-wise. Not just dating or having a brief affair.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:23 PM
9

This is well-said. Sex for women is like sands in the desert. The man attached to the sex is the important thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:20 PM
14

Don’t forget, women are brainwashed from birth to reject sex, to think it’s bad, to believe it can ruin your life. Even men, the very people who want sex from you, don’t want you to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:17 PM
6

I married the needle in a haystack, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:13 PM
3

Nobody said emotional labor. I mean practical labor. The home, the errands, the food, the cleaning…if you don’t think a clean bathroom adds to your quality of life, I beg to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:09 PM
8

No. Our tradition, which is kinda disappearing, is, the man presents himself to the woman, which is why they used to pay for dates. If they marry, then the woman overwhelmingly works toward their quality of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:07 PM
7

This is interesting. It is as difficult to find a partner that is ‘amazing in bed’ as it is to find a needle in a haystack. It would be very tough to find a partner who is ALL the things you need in a husband, plus, he must knock your socks off in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:37 PM
2

Look, it’s okay to think younger people look better than older people. They usually do, men and women. You don’t have to concoct ‘biological’ reasons why some men like younger women. Women think younger men are prettier, too. With the gender hierarchy the way it is, (if a male human is supposed to feel superior) it is MUCH easier to feel superior to a younger woman. If a woman has the same experience, salary, and sexual prowess as you, I imagine the road to superiority is more difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:26 PM
3

Because porn is performative. And, (just like horror movies have to go further and further to shock people) porn has to get more extreme in order to maintain interest. I would not think it was a part of ‘normal sex.’
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:19 PM
2

Yes. You are presenting yourself to that woman. Most men try to put their best foot forward. It changes after marriage, where the woman is expected to do the lion’s share of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:14 PM
10

Not many women require these things. Birthdays and Christmas, yes. Women provide quality of life for men, aside from sex. They do a hundred different things a day to keep the quality of life high for both of you. Sex is a fringe benefit, not a major factor in all of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:12 PM
5

Not always. I’ve been married for 33 years. I can’t even remember a time where I went on a ‘date’ with my husband. Some relationships have some steam on their own, without all the extra effort. We just click.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:07 PM
3

What does that mean? Validated as a successful male-in bed?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:04 PM
2

If you like someone, and they like you, you usually have good sex. And, women are not commitment-hungry. We might not want this guy around forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:43 AM
2

Hook a man with kink before you lose the chance, girls! s/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:19 PM
3

It was against the law in some states. Imagine.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:18 PM
3

That sounds like horrible sex and dangerous, too. I can see how some people like watching porn, but to imitate it? Nope nope nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:10 PM
3

I think it must be exaggerated. I never met a woman who said she was submissive. I think most would be insulted by an assumption like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:06 PM
2

I think most, if I remember that far back. But I was single in pre-porn days.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:03 PM
4

This all sounds gross. Thank heaven I’m married. I’d hate to be stuck with bad porno sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:02 PM
5

There are more normal people out there than kinky.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:00 PM
1

People who lack romantic experience can easily fall victim to the manipulation of an older partner. The brains are not the same, and if the older partner is a man, their acute interest in sex at any cost can put that young person in harm’s way. Would you want your 23 year old daughter sleeping with a 45 year old, middle-aged man? How will that look at family barbecues and weddings? Please…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:56 PM
1

Someone with scant experience will always wonder what they missed out on. You’ll wonder if this was the best you could do, if you should have waited…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:12 PM
1

For heavens sake, look back at the 20th century. What changes happened across the board? We are in a different culture now, but we still have some leftovers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:21 AM
0

Because that’s what humans do. We sort through the mess, decide what we want, and settle down with a better chance of a good relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:18 AM
14

Yes, they do. Sperm depreciate after 35 and cause 6x more neurological problems in offspring. If you want children, do it young.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:16 AM
12

Dying alone with cats? Don’t threaten me with a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:14 AM
-1

It’s a legal age, but not by much. A very, very young and naive adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:12 AM
4

Your experience is anecdotal, the word reddit loves so much. I have experienced very different attitudes in the dating world, and older women are the thing now. Do a search-you’ll see that things have changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 03:36 AM
-1

The stage of life is so different, that the younger person is like a child compared to a 45 year old. 23 is just out of college.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 03:33 AM
2

What if she’s sick and can’t have sex? What if she hasn’t spoken to him in any real way for years? What if she is abusive, or constantly criticizing? People sometimes cheat for relief, to make sure they are still sane, to see if they can be a whole person again. Not everyone sneaks around trying to get laid every chance they get. Nothing is simple in marriage. You have to stay close to your spouse and make sure they are doing okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 02:37 AM
2

This is ‘way too simplistic. People go outside their marriage for a thousand different reasons. You can’t say the spouse didn’t choose well. You can’t even say the one who strays has ever done it before. You just don’t know what’s going to come down the pike when you commit to one person.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 02:32 AM
4

Misogyny is rampant in the culture we think of as ‘normal.’ We have not lived in a time without a gender hierarchy. Imagine how it would be…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:57 AM
5

Because women aren’t usually pedophiles, we don’t catcall, get pushy about sex, try to coerce unwilling guys into having sex, rape drunk men, or stare at random men’s bulges. We don’t use money as leverage to get sex. Sex is easy for women to get, so we don’t have to resort to subterfuge to get laid. Therefore, we are safer partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:25 AM
3

Leo acts that way because he’s famous and strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:21 AM
4

I wasn’t until younger men started asking me out. I never considered it, but it was okay. Men seem to be into much older women these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:19 AM
3

A woman’s prime is 35-55.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:18 AM
1

Their behavior proves otherwise. Most men are lucky to get any date.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:17 AM
5

If you are 45, a 23 year old is a child, uncle Billy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:16 AM
8

They disdain child support and are fearful of being baby-trapped. Oh, and they love babysitting toddlers, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:14 AM
5

Hot, young women? Who are you-are you an adolescent boy wondering what life will be like?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:13 AM
7

This sounds very red-pilly to me, using thousand-year-old societies as an example for today’s social life. Fertility? Since when are men interested in babies? They’re not even part of the whole abortion question. I think women who can no longer give birth would be in great demand-no danger of child support or baby trapping, god forbid. People, including men, fall in love with people they can relate to. Most men date within 5 years of their own age, either way. DiCaprio might have erection proble…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:10 AM
1

Can you be more clear? I don’t get your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:42 PM
1

What does that mean? Two people make a commitment to each other. You trade your commitment for the other’s commitment. That’s the deal. You give your sex life to that person, and they give theirs to you. So, what isn’t clear to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 06:18 PM
2

If sex stops, there is another reason for it. Nobody willingly kisses their sex life goodbye. There has to be a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 06:16 PM
-4

Most, or many women rely on oral in order to come. That would be like having sex but not touching the man’s penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 01:00 PM
1

I think all women understand this. I get your point. I also believe every boyfriend a woman has is viewed as a possible husband, but it is difficult to meet one so early in life. Most women have no trouble getting pregnant after age 30/35. You still have lots of egg cells left, plenty to get pregnant. The absolute truth is, to have a family, it takes 20 years of your life to raise those kids. It can be early or late, whatever time in life you meet your partner and are financially ready for it. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 07:59 PM
1

My dear, anyone, male or female, who has a career realizes that, if they truly want a family, they have to find a spouse. This is big news to no one. For women, or for anyone, it’s better to earn your own money than rely on the whims of someone else. Your answer sounds as though you think ‘feminism’ is some kind of faddish alternative thinking, instead of the very clear logic that it endorses. Women have been earning money and raising families for decades. I doubt very much that a 39 year old ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:16 PM
1

Most of the people I met while single I got to know in a certain setting; a class, in theater, playing golf, etc. With people judging you at first glance as on Tinder or whatever, I suppose looks are all you have to go on. I’ve had some not-very-beautiful boyfriends who were wonderful people, but I was able to get to know them first. Just reading your responses, it sounds like a cruel world. If you were around lots of women who could get to know you, looks wouldn’t matter as much. For starters, …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 12:50 PM
1

That’s a strange take. Anyone can choose their sex partners. Men can and do refuse or are not interested in every woman. Women can choose their partners. Why wouldn’t every person pursue who attracts them, male or female? Your sex life belongs to you to direct however you want. There’s no other logical way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 11:57 AM
1

Contacts help. But many people try a couple of businesses before they hit on the one that works. People try different careers. It happens a lot before you reach success, if that’s what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 04:32 AM
1

If you get out of college at 22, get your masters, you’re already 24 or 25. There’s still time to get established. I don’t know anyone who had kids in their 20s. I was over 40 when I had mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 04:30 AM
1

You just have to start before you’re 35 or so.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 04:27 AM
0

Looks help, but if you haven’t developed yourself into an intelligent and warm person, it’s going nowhere. Men are so romantic at heart, they dream of having a wonderful person to love and care for, to share life with. You can just about hear the yearning on every page of Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 02:49 AM
1

Yes, of course. Just because you can doesn’t mean you have to. And I love the ‘girl boss’ phrase- if you are a boss you are probably a woman. Careers don’t ruin marriages, they help them. Men were trapped and miserable back when there was only one paycheck-I lived through that. And, kids don’t prevent loneliness. That’s something you fix for yourself. I think if men are so very concerned about women having children late in life, they should stop wasting our time with bs relationships. That would…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 02:42 AM
0

Everyone can control the sex they have. And anyone can choose to make a commitment or not. It’s not a gender thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 02:35 AM
2

Disagree. Plenty of success stories follow numerous failures. The idea that it’s innate is not real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 02:33 AM
0

That’s completely untrue. Men fall in love with women for their kindness, intelligence, humor, compassion. Many women and men who are not raving beauties find each other and create lives together. You must know that, or you’ve just dropped onto the planet yesterday. And I don’t recall men clamoring to be fathers and wanting babies very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 02:31 AM
0

It’s hard to believe, as if you need a meal from an outside party. When I was single, I never even thought of the dinner, just if I liked the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 10:04 PM
1

In the Post? I rest my case.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 10:01 PM
4

Or crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:57 PM
2

Why are we using the term ‘alpha’ for humans? Sounds ridiculous. The OPs numbered traits are possible in anyone, male or female.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:57 PM
2

Free meals??! Now I’ve heard everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:43 PM
1

Women do refuse marriage. I did several times. Why would the guy be the only one who doesn’t want marriage? It makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:35 PM
1

Not every woman wants children. In the past, women had fewer choices, so they wound up with kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:32 PM
5

There are plenty of relationships where the woman doesn’t want the guy permanently. Whoever said men are gatekeepers (as if all women want them around forever)?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:30 PM
13

A man who is friends with you because he wants sex is like a friend who calls you only when he wants to borrow money.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:27 PM
1

You can’t generalize. Hot, intelligent women do exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 05:24 AM
–

Well, in certain friend groups, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 07:38 PM
1

Okay, we all have our party manners, I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 12:33 PM
1

Sorry, I probably didn’t get who-said-what-to-whom, but I had to comment. There is no comparison between men and women and the cultural sex vibe we are taught. In a young woman’s world, sex is bad, dangerous, yucky, and can ruin your life. There is no mention of pleasure. If you feel pleasure eventually, you feel dirty and wrong. Maybe men make the mistake of thinking women are given the same approach to sex that they themselves experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 12:30 PM
2

Most of my friends are single or divorced and do NOT want a man in their lives, as it is, “Too much hassle and work”. It is very freeing to get off the dating roller coaster and just live for your own life. Thank you for a thoughtful essay.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 12:24 PM
1

I have to add, what the bmi calls “obese” and what you or I would call “obese” are 2 different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 11:40 AM
1

The most attention I received was when I was almost 40, in stores, in clubs, at the beach, just walking through town. It doesn’t end. It never did. And the guys are younger, usually 10 years younger. My husband is younger. I just don’t get this 30s thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:55 AM
1

Women look great into their 40s and 50s. Who ever said your 30s (!) are a decline decade? It’s incredible-some women in their 40s look 25. I’m 71, people think I’m 48, especially on the beach. 30s? You’re still just a baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:50 AM
1

No. No. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:43 AM
1

Women are possibly more visual-it just doesn’t make us think of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:42 AM
1

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a handsome man and thought of sex. Just, ‘Wow! Cute guy!’ I am extremely visual, an artist, a designer, yet I see perfect features and admire the features. It doesn’t go straight to my panties.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:41 AM
1

Maybe their looks give them the confidence to make that happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:38 AM
1

You have to remember that for many, if not most women, their first impression of sex is gross (when you are young and first find out about it). You swear you will never do such a disgusting thing. You are told it’s dangerous, can ruin your life, and that every man will try to trick you into doing it. For an adult woman to think a man is sexually attractive, you have to overcome more than a decade of negative aspects of sex. Porn looks predatory and unkind. If women don’t think, ‘sex’ when they s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:31 AM
1

No way. Nobody looks better pushing 50 than when they were 23-25.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:16 AM
1

I don’t find him attractive at all, never did. Pumpkin head.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:13 AM
1

I have declined dates with guys who were all over the place. I’m not a notch on a bedpost. If he’s had numerous relationships, that’s different. But tons of ONSs, no thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:34 AM
1

But, why would this woman be a virgin? If not religious, she could be too withdrawn, too uptight, too unemotional to want sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:32 AM
2

Intelligence is the most important feature. That, and objectivity. If a man has these two features, it prevents so many problems in a relationship. You don’t have to explain everything forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:21 AM
0

Disagree. We are all different.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:19 AM
1

Men need more than height. I don’t even consider height when deciding if a man is attractive. It’s his face and body proportions that are more important.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:16 AM
1

I am repelled by ‘masculine’ men in some ways. They can seem unintelligent or coarse, too big, and just don’t have the awareness that I look for. Talent is attractive, assertiveness is attractive, but what is most attractive is-does he have his life together, or does he live like a pig. Does he like animals and treats them well, is he logical? If a man has logic and can see clearly, fear of women disappears, misogyny is gone, he gives himself to the relationship. I like a slender man with nice f…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:10 AM
3

Some men only realize what they had after it’s gone. Men tend to love you when the affair is over. Then again, it could be nostalgia.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:56 AM
1

In a LTR, companionship and respect and partnership are as important, or even more important than sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:52 AM
1

How is an honest man being himself unattractive? I’ve known all different types of men who are just themselves, and they were kind, smart, and attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:48 AM
0

You are very wrong. You may want it to be that way, but the reality is children follow role models. For men especially, successful mothers (outside the home) point them toward success in later life. Daughters need to see women in powerful positions in order to realize they can do more than unpaid cooking and cleaning. Sons will realize that men can do house chores, too. When men are the sole breadwinners, they are too easily taken advantage of and they feel unappreciated and a stranger to their …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 12:55 PM
0

Of course not, but parents who set examples usually have children who imitate them. It’s common knowledge that parents are role models. I know I have strongly influenced my 2 daughters and my son, and so has my husband. They and their friends are paving the way to a world that will be so much more altruistic and open-minded than where we are now. When you have children someday, you’ll see how they model themselves after you, they like what you like, they learn from you. Not everything of course,…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 02:04 AM
1

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 09:05 PM
1

I think both.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 09:04 PM
2

Most jobs require knowledge, which anyone can have. That was my only point. The soufflé was just a joke. Our opinions of gender differences are mostly that: opinions. We form them from the particular generation that our lives overlapped. 100 years ago people thought if a woman had a job outside the home, her sex organs would shrivel up. The first women in the Olympics ran a half mile, because people thought that was all they could do. 50 years from now we will be laughing at our current gender r…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 04:27 PM
1

There is nothing magical about what women or men do. Your genitalia has nothing to do with your talents or interests. Both genders can do anything they want. Why wouldn’t a woman change a tire? There would be no reason to not do it. Why wouldn’t a man change a baby? Again, no reason for or against.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 04:09 PM
-1

You can’t judge a normal culture by situations in extremist countries. They are immersed in religion, which has no logic whatsoever. They will change eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 04:03 PM
1

Well, what I’m saying is, the culture was heading that way even if feminism did not give it a name. Birth control, education, a high divorce rate, all contributed to women leading their own lives and making their own money. Feminism is dear to me, it got the word out there, and educated the world. It was the steam engine of change. But there were elements in the culture for women’s freedom that happened before the movement. And the most basic of all, it is illogical to discriminate based on geni…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:49 PM
-1

Don’t be ridiculous. Making a perfect squash soufflé is more difficult than changing a tire. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:42 PM
0

Incorrect. And your circle of friends sound older, when only men had day care. Do you think the freshman class at Harvard had stay-at-home moms? The best example for your children is to show them both parents can achieve in the outside world, AND in the family. Daughters need to see mom earning money, sons will respect their future wive’s careers and both help raise a family. Besides, think of the world without the contributions, energy and talent of half the population!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 12:27 PM
7

This is laughable. So meaningless, just crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 04:37 AM
0

Her career and education have EVERYTHING to do with raising those children. Children mimic their parents. Smart parents make smart kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 04:31 AM
1

Of course it is. Red pill has always come up with twisted beliefs in order to placate themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 04:22 AM
1

The concept of paternity is only 10,000 years old, a sliver of time in human history. People did not pair up in ancient times.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 04:01 AM
2

Remember, the gender roles didn’t exist. Everyone hunted. Everyone fished. It was not as necessary to trade sex for resources. It makes sense to trade sex for money, but money didn’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:59 AM
16

None of these points are valid. It’s just a contrived fairy tale. What has happened with women would have happened with or without feminism (it might have taken longer without the movement). Once people gain freedom and broaden their horizons, especially earning money, they never go back. In a modern workforce, women do everything men do, and it will continue to be this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:45 AM
2

I know a lot of women. They feel the same. Even when I was 35, 40 would have been a bit older, but at least appropriate. I think the ‘men age like wine’ thing was probably written by a man. Cheers.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:22 AM
2

Disagree. As a woman, if I were 25, I would consider someone 40 years old as an ‘older man’ and way too old for me. Like a dad.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 01:20 PM
1

I know no intelligent person, male or female, who disagrees with feminism in its true meaning. But I’m new on this forum. Seems to be distorted in a way.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 01:05 PM
1

Feminism has become something online that it was never meant to be. Feminism is supposed to be, simply, justice, where discrimination due to gender is illogical and damaging to society in general. That’s it. Not hatred, not unfair advantage, not negativity. Just a level playing field. Period.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 01:03 PM
1

Try not to think of assertive as “masculine” and compliance as “feminine”. Try to see individuals as they are, with a variety of traits. Think of feminism as freedom for both genders, not a complaint department. Many women and men see traditional roles as restrictive and contrived, so I would try to loosen up or women may see you as a prison.
/r/seduction17/07/22 04:55 PM
3

I’m a woman who gets a lot of attention. I’ve had many relationships with men my own height (5’6”) or a little shorter. It is completely immaterial to me how tall a man is; why would I pass over a great man for a lousy 3 or 4 inches? To me, it’s pure idiocy. Davey Jones was the cutest and most popular heartthrob Monkee. Watch some old shows on Youtube. He’s a total Ladyboner at 5’2”.
/r/seduction17/07/22 04:36 PM
1

‘I’m having a pretty nice dream right now’
/r/seduction17/07/22 04:30 PM
1

Then again, the new ‘old people’ are the Woodstock generation. They know what‘s hot and what’s not.
/r/seduction17/07/22 04:27 PM
0

Depends on how you chase.
/r/seduction12/07/22 08:51 PM
0

I disagree that men are the gatekeepers of relationships. Either gender can desire a relationship, and either gender can shut it down. Men desire relationships and intimacy just as women do.
/r/seduction12/07/22 07:53 PM
2

East village is young and very vibrant-on weekends the bars spill over into the street
/r/seduction12/07/22 05:18 AM
1

Woman here. Without knowing more about ‘how feminine?’ I can say this; women are attracted to feminine qualities if they are a certain type. Think of boy bands, male models, even the Beatles were very feminine for the times with their long hair, silly jokes in interviews, slim bodies, and recording many ‘girl group’ songs early in their careers. I would say you’re fine with leaning feminine, esp. with younger women who like cute guys and not hulky, hairy, super manly men.
/r/seduction11/07/22 01:16 PM
2

Not true. I know many quality people in their mid-20,s who have recently moved to nyc to pursue careers. They love it. One is already engaged. Maybe you’re in the wrong neighborhood?
/r/seduction08/07/22 01:04 PM
1

Woman here. I always had guys approaching me, trying to chat me up in clubs or at the beach… One thing that made me want to pursue a further friendship was a touch of humility. This may be the opposite of what men are told, but if I am approached with a conversation that is more ‘him looking up to me’ instead of an arrogant approach, I would be much more likely to be interested in this person. Example: (this is an exact quote) ’I’m not coming over here to bother you, but I had to tell you…there …
/r/seduction08/07/22 01:01 PM
1

It means your features are proportional, and you have a general sort of attractiveness.
/r/seduction08/07/22 12:38 PM
1

Didn't notice.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 08:47 PM
1

No, it's mostly due to men's reputation for being predatory and pursuing very young women. Males have a long history of taking advantage of young women, of abusing naive partners, of physical violence. Women have no such reputation (motherhood, housewifery) and are viewed as benign partners. That's why.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 08:35 PM
1

If it's back child support and alimony, then it's not his money to burn. He might be bitter about a divorce, but it doesn't justify his actions.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 08:11 PM
3

I'm new here, and an older woman, married, and 'first wave' feminist. Feminism was never about giving yourself away and feeling degraded and used. It only gave women the right to engage in sex or not, whatever is best for you and serves your purposes and desires. It made sex for women not taboo anymore, but was never intended to make you more available to men for sex.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy28/10/19 09:56 PM
1

Well, we are all random people on the internet. You don't know me. I've been living feminism for 45 years, from the time when it was a 'new concept' and people thought women shouldn't have jobs. Really.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:55 AM
1

I agree with all of the above-it's usually activism that instigates the real changes to unfair laws. I think people call me second-wave, as I was active in the movement in the 70s and all the rest of my life. But there are times when I think the movement is pulling away from its origins. And I don't understand the hostility so many people have towards feminism now-I always just said, "If you don't agree with it, you don't understand it."
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:42 AM
1

That's not feminism in the true meaning of the movement - that's asking for special treatment. Maybe some women feel like they are 'owed' after so many years of discrimination, but true feminism is just independence and a fair culture that does not encumber one with arbitrary gender roles.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 11:15 PM
1

That's not what real feminism is. Feminism is just equal opportunity. That's it.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 01:26 AM
-2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:53 PM
-21

Feminism is not unfair advantage. I call that 'Internet feminism.' I think because we are so used to women being lesser than, when they want equality it seems like unfair advantage. Personally, instead of asking for equality, I think it's better to just BE equal. Everyone else will catch on eventually.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:50 PM
-20

You can't look at these as if the 2 genders are the same. You have to read them as if one is lower in terms of the culture, as the genders have been for ages. In spite of that, I find them fairly logical.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:49 PM
4

If a sex encounter is this precarious, you're probably sleeping with people you hardly know. Not a good idea.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 01:58 PM
0

As a former hottie with many hottie friends, I never once went out with anyone for 'what I could get.' Dinner, drinks and trips are easily acquired with your own salary and it's never worth the trouble to sit through these things with someone you don't like. Attractive women want sincerity, and can sniff out the fakers.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 01:47 PM
1

The attitude on this site is the reason they marched.
/r/MGTOW23/01/17 03:45 PM
1

They are telling Trump that he can't change policy that the public does not agree with. They came out in huge numbers all over the world to make an impact and a statement. And I believe that the definition of feminism is usually incorrect on the web, so you might be wrong on its purpose if you go by what's on certain sites.
/r/MGTOW21/01/17 05:48 PM
1

Since when are men so keen on having babies? That whole focus is a good theory, but it is only a theory. Men are attracted to women, and a certain kind of woman can be a perfect fit for your personality. Forgive me, but someone older is so much more wise and laid back then a 20 year old. I was a 20-year-old also, I know how it is when you're still a baby. I know this forum likes to think female opportunity coincides with that female's appearance, and rp seems to cherish the idea of anyone over 3…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/16 12:07 AM
1

You leave out personality, chemistry, likes and dislikes, and everything that makes a good relationship. Men are not attracted to ovaries, they are attracted to a person. Sometimes you fall in love and it doesn't matter if you can have kids or not. You want that person regardless. Oh, I had 3 children after the age of 40-all very successful and lovely.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 12:45 AM
1

It depends-my husband is someone anyone would be after. He is 7 years younger than I-great dad-great career-handsome-can do anything, and I mean anything well-top executive-great athlete.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 12:35 AM
3

You are absolutely correct. Anytime I broke up with a guy friend, there was always someone waiting, or you'd meet guys in supermarkets, at the beach, everywhere. I wanted to be by myself at times, but it was difficult to politely turn people down all the time.This did not change as I entered my thirties, and late thirties. Married at 40. I always joke to friends, "Why waste your best-looking years being married and raising kids? Wine and dine and have them when you're older!"
/r/TheRedPill22/08/16 02:39 AM
-4

You buy her a drink to be courteous and get to know her? It's a foreshadowing of the provider you could be? To show your admiration? To be a gentleman in the best sense of the word? A woman does not admire a cheap man; you may not like it, but it's true. Traditionally, men had the money, so they were your pipeline to a better life. Women are definitely more practical in relationships, because their livelihood used to depend on it. Even now, the vestiges remain, but I would not throw drinks aroun…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/16 02:46 AM
9

Brad Pitt and company made a remake of the original with Frank Sinatra and company. They didn't write the movie. Producers would rather stick with the tried-and-true scripts than gamble on an unproven one. Many classic movies are destroyed by remakes. If you scroll down your movie list on TV and get excited about seeing a classic, great movie, more often than not it was made in 2007 or something like that.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/16 02:24 AM
1

Nobody has ever said women are as strong as men. Men naturally have more muscle, but this is a natural occurrence, not an accomplishment. A woman can make people in her body-men can't. This is a natural function, not an accomplishment. I don't believe you can take credit for things you were born to naturally, like red hair, etc.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 11:14 PM
0

When a man gives birth, I'll agree the genders are the same. Anyone who claims men and women are the same is delusional-and that concept is not part of true'feminism'-the worst thing a feminist can do is argue with the truth. No one ever said females can compete with males in sports, and who cares? Women excel in enough areas without worrying about sports, too.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 02:48 AM
1

Not so much height and weight, but muscle mass. Men have about 76.6 pounds of muscle, where women have about 46 pounds. No matter if size or weight is the same, the muscle mass would put each gender in a different category. A win with almost double the muscle mass of your opponent is no win at all; it's like competing against much smaller man. That's why they separate the genders.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 02:37 AM
1

Male and female genitalia are both messy. Better to be messy once a month than every time you have sex. And periods aren't blood, (like from a cut);it's the vestiges of a pregnancy that never happened. So, in a way, a positive thing (in most circumstances...).
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 12:16 AM
0

Heavyweight boxers don't fight middleweights. Middleweights don't fight bantamweights. Wrestling is divided by body weight. Instead of thinking of sports as divided by gender, think of them as divided by size and weight. You don't see an Arnold Schwarzenegger competing against a Woody Allen. Men don't do it to themselves in sports in the name of fairness. Same thing with gender.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 11:47 PM
1

"Men age like wine" is a myth perpetuated by men-kinda like "size doesn't matter." How you take care of yourself (regardless of gender) determines who will be attracted to you. I know RP guys can't wait for the satisfaction of seeing the women who turned them down, age. But most women look their best from 35-45. I would say after 50, you have to really be vigilant about your looks. I am female, and the older I got, the more men, mostly younger, asked me out. I married a younger man at 40, had 3 …
/r/TheRedPill18/07/16 03:43 PM
0

I don't think equality means doing the same things. It means being valued for whatever you do well, your individual talents. I'm old enough to remember the phrase 'dumb housewife' or 'dumb secretary.' If these roles had been respected, there never would have been a women's movement. Half the population is not going to settle for lower status, not when they work so hard. And, remember, marriage put women in a very precarious financial position that no man would put up with.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/16 01:40 AM
1

This post brings up a question; for any given man there is a another man who is physically stronger. But that doesn't make the weaker man inferior-he just has different strong points besides the physical. Or are all men inferior to the tallest and strongest of them all?
/r/TheRedPill17/07/16 01:30 AM
3

The vast majority of women do not climax from penetration, no matter how long you last, or what you do. Countless studies have worn this fact to death. For women, oral sex is sex.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/16 10:21 PM
1

This works. When my husband gets on me for what I call "guy crap" (bills, no time together, my distant attitude, etc. etc.) I just keep my distant self and let him know that when he's ready to be normal again and not be kvetchy, I'll be agreeable.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/07/16 04:35 AM
1

If you don't perform oral sex, to the vast majority of women, you're a bad lover, and she'll tell her friends what a waste you are. From these descriptions of sex, a woman is more likely to call 911 than actually go for anything like this. Completely delusional. Most people, male and female, have forced sex fantasies; not because they want to be raped, but because they are trying to alleviate the guilt of self-pleasuring. (..if they force me, I'm not to blame...) Very few women climax from inter…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/16 04:06 AM
-15

But wars are started by men. The prisons are full of men. Every barroom fight I ever saw was between 2 men. Men commit most of the burglaries, murders, car-jackings, etc. Where is the leadership in those cases? Women are perfectly fine governing themselves. They've done it since the beginning of time. Keeping women in check might be an exercise of males who don't want to share any power-I can't believe it's due to your concern for their well-being.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 01:02 AM
5

None of the above is part of feminism. It's just the crude interpretation of feminism that you find on the internet. Real feminism never assumed men and women were the same. Many feminists think women have always had it better than men in every culture (war, anyone?) Feminism has saved more lives than you can imagine-if you could have seen how people lived in the 50s, with strict gender roles, everyone taking valium to cope, you would have a different perspective. Women love men. There is nothin…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 12:47 AM
0

You may not remember that our culture in the US always degraded housewives. Long before feminism, being a housewife was akin to being an idiot. If the culture had treated women's accomplishments with respect and reward, a women's movement would not have been necessary. I consider myself a feminist (the real kind, not the right- wing aberration) I stayed home with the kids, am a fabulous cook, keep everything running at home, help hubby and kids with anything they need. I will not dismiss my work…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 05:44 PM
-1

What's happened with women in our culture would have happened with or without a 'women's movement.' That's just the name we gave it. Economics, education, workplace technology, and an examination of past injustice made gender roles illogical and obsolete. This leaves both genders a little off-balance, as any change does, but a balance will come eventually.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 05:30 PM
0

You may marry money, but it is still not your accomplishment.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 05:14 PM
-1

Women want fulfillment in a relationship that is permanent and closed off from other men. If she is not fulfilled, or the man is ignoring her or considers her less important than himself, she's wasting her time. She leaves to find more joy-simple as that.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 04:43 AM
0

You sound a little patronizing and condescending. Definitely not husband material, unless she wants an oppressive roommate. Following little rules may work for your ego, (haha I won!) but a true LTR takes wisdom.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 04:24 AM
0

A high count means she's attractive and nice and has a healthy sex drive. I don't think calling these women 'sluts' is appropriate, as most normal, educated women have a good number of partners by the time they are 27 or 28. ( I think the 'slut' label comes from an intense desire for control and to have no past competition.) I for one never even think about the past when I'm in a relationship. I'm too egotistical to think I'd have any competition, and as her last lover, I would consider myself t…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 05:04 PM
0

Many times Red Pill tries to create a new reality that doesn't reflect real life, but is born out of rejection, resentment and revenge. Many ideas on this site exist in an imaginary man-world. Most of the time I am compelled to comment because the logic is so screwy, and I worry about the people on this site who believe it all, and their future social lives. Draw conclusions from your experiences, not from a bunch of pissed-off men. If you take the conclusions of some of the men on this site you…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 04:53 PM
0

Yes, you're right, but since we don't have a time machine, we have to use representations. The 'Leave it to Beaver' show was pretty accurate for the times. It's funny now, but back then it was a desired lifestyle.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 04:42 PM
0

This is wrong in every way. Red Pill's resentfulness toward females has clouded the logic on this site, sadly. Go to a mall and look at the older men-pretty sorry sight. Hollywood has no connection to real life, so you can't use movies as a guide. Also, most "older women" don't want another man in their life, as they are tired of taking care of people and want to live their own life for once. Men take up many, many hours of your time in their care and feeding, and a woman doesn't get a break unt…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 04:29 PM
0

at 30 to 35 you're just a baby. If you can't look beautiful at that age then something is wrong. Women look gorgeous up until maybe 48-50. IMHO, 35 is the most attractive age for females.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 04:19 PM
-18

This is misguided in every way possible. A woman's value is determined by what she has accomplished. Period. She may attract quality men, but her status depends on what she alone has done with her life. Marriage is no Band-Aid for mediocrity.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/14 04:00 PM
3

Menopause is mother nature's way of saying, OK-the tough stuff is done. Go live your life and have fun! (I have also read the theory of the necessity for older 'free' members of society, who can help raise the young, find food, etc. The survival of the species depends on it.) I don't think any woman wants to be giving birth at 55. And quite frankly, some of these older guys who have new families at age 60-I feel for them. They will have no relief from family chaos in their entire lives! Maybe me…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 01:27 AM
-7

Look around. Older women are the people you see running charities, working in soup kitchens, volunteering at hospitals. They are the people who create your wonderful holidays, run non-profits, watch your children for you, teach your children in school, travel around the world, engage in every endeavor known to man. They are the backbone of every culture on earth. There is far more to growing older than weeping for your 24 inch waist, and the way a woman looks is only a tiny part of what she is. …
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 01:33 AM
-34

Men get old, too. Don't kid yourself. And older women usually have more and more guys asking them out, esp. younger men. RP is a lot of wishful thinking, like saying 'size doesn't matter.' It's like you can't wait til all these young girls (who rejected you) turn into old hags. Well, it doesn't happen that way. The real world is not the one designed by rp. Sorry guys.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 02:01 AM
-2

Calling conversation "gossip" says it all. With one word, the rest of this becomes total BS.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/14 04:30 PM
-2

If you have children, you are handling 2 careers. You cannot concentrate on one career anymore, so your efforts are diluted. You won't progress as much. But raising a child is infinitely more important than making money-you have to have some energy left for your family. Women should not beat themselves up for not making as much money as their husbands; they are doing more important, albeit unpaid, work. Raising a family is more difficult than any paper-shuffling office job.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/14 03:44 AM
-3

I suggest everyone watch an episode of "Leave it to Beaver" and put yourself in June Cleaver's life. That was the reason feminism came about. You absolutely must see and understand where it came from, the marginal and financially dangerous lives women were living, to understand the point. If you disagree with the fact that women were designated to a lower level than men, that they were expected to abdicate all power over their own lives, that their highest calling was self-sacrifice, that their …
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 05:40 AM
-2

People in serious relationships share all their fears (and joys) with each other-that's the best part of a good relationship. You won't turn into wimpy-man if you confide in a girl; women are understanding. I wouldn't jump into it with a superficial girl friend, but someone with intelligence and grace. An older woman is usually more understanding.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 05:25 AM
0

Ummm...anything on Fox is so biased toward outdated ideas, I don't even consider it a news station You might as well watch John Stossel.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 05:15 AM
-4

20-30 is not a lot. But, if you yourself have not had much sex, I can see where it might sound like a lot of partners. In an atmosphere where you are immersed in people your own age (like college)it's not all that many partners, spread over several years. If you're a homebody and keep to yourself, I would imagine this sounds like a whole lotta partners.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 05:00 AM
1

Women who marry young and have not had many lovers are ALWAYS wondering about what they missed out on, and will usually stray out of curiosity somewhere down the line. If a woman has had her share of experiences, she knows she's not missing out on anything-she knows there is no sexual wonderland 'out there.' IMHO, she's more likely to be happy with 1 guy.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 04:48 AM
-3

I am female, and was single for most of my 30's. It was sooo much better than when I was younger-most single men are in their 20's, and they are the ones who ask you out. If you are a guy, you'll find most women in their thirties are already married, so that leaves you with the younger women who are still single. Also, many women don't even want to get married anymore, so there should be some around who are your age. If you aren't an alcoholic, and you don't have a drug problem, you should be ab…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/14 09:10 PM
-1

Why would you have to call 'morning-after regret' anything? Why would anyone call it rape? Are we all the star of a reality show or something, as if we are all being watched? We've all had those "Holy cow, did I sleep with that?!" moments, but why on earth would anyone publicize it more with a rape accusation? Just go home. I find it hard to believe this actually happens. Probably the man is expecting sex and strongarms the woman into it thinking it's consensual-he's surprised that she calls it …
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 02:01 AM
1

I've had lifelong male friends that I never had a relationship with-fishing buddies, ski trip friends, and 3- hour- long conversation friends. If you have had brothers you are perfectly comfortable with male friends, and they are comfortable with you. My guy friends have told me I'm their favorite person-this after 20 years of friendship. The quality and education of the women you know appears to be very low. You don't know what you are missing. Or, it could be you bring the bad behavior on your…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 01:44 AM
-1

But how do you feel about not being able to produce your own children? I mean, the fact that you need to go through another person in order to pass your genes along, and all the hoops you must jump through in order to do so? I would think this would be a huge handicap. As for 'getting fucked'-does the hand go in the glove, or does the glove go over the hand?
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 08:42 PM
0

Both sexes have domination fantasies, but not because they want it to come true. It's a way to have sex without being responsible for doing something nasty. If someone forces you, it's not your fault, thus you are guilt-free. Has no correlation to real life.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 08:32 PM
0

As an older woman, I always used the analogy to friends, "It's like being a rock star or an actor who nobody recognizes anymore." But it is a relief. When everyone either stares, hangs out of a car, talks to you in the grocery store, jogs up alongside you, like a rock star or an actor who can finally go out in public, it is a relief to finally be anonymous. When you are a young female, going out of the house feels like you're going onstage, you are always on display, always being glared at. And …
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 11:30 PM
-5

Throwing someone around, manhandling them and rough aggressive sex is a good way to get yourself arrested, or at least make that particular woman avoid men like you in the future. The most important thing a man can do is learn how to perform very, very well in the bedroom. Women will put up with all kinds of nonsense in daily life if you know what you're doing. Nothing, but nothing gains contempt like some guy who thinks he's Tarzan but can't hit all those important notes during sex. I even wrot…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 10:52 PM
-2

Um...anger issues anyone? Bitter, reactive men usually don't get the girl. His wife sounds fine-women don't get to high places in life if they sweetie-pie everyone.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 10:39 PM
-1

Is there an agreement on Tinder that you always split the bill? I never used it, don't know.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 10:02 PM
-2

No. There's no family in YOUR house.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 01:46 AM
2

Trying to pinpoint feminism without examining the past will get you nowhere. Many of the situations that women call 'unfair' today are an over-reaction to the situations in the past. If you look at life in the 30s, 40s, and 50s, you can understand why so many points that seem silly now are just a way of overcompensating. For example-women had no life or identity of their own in the past (even sacrificed their names!) so now it's a premium to be 'confident' and 'independent' because it is believe…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 01:31 AM
0

Your using the term 'feminism' as a wastebasket word for different problems in society. Most of the complaints here have nothing to do with feminism. Remember that the political right has turned feminism into something it was never meant to be. Basic feminism is just freedom from social channeling, and equal pay for equal work. (The unequal pay came about because when women had a job, it was considered 'extra money' and it was assumed someone else was supporting her with the 'real money.') These…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/14 02:24 AM
-1

So much of this board is illogical and just plain inexperienced, I always try to get a word in about how male/female relationships really are, without the distortion of frustration, which seems to permeate this forum. What I say is from real experience-the word 'hamstering' is insulting and dismissive. This attitude will make women shrink from having anything to do with you. If you've ever read any SS propaganda regarding jews, they describe them as..."shuffling walk, flapping arms, slurring voi…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 11:25 PM
1

Feminists are angry for the same reason rp guys are angry-they feel the injustice of the culture, and don't want to take it anymore. I think the initial era of feminine rage is over. The second stage, third stage is achieving more, getting a better education. This forum is very reminiscent of the early days of the women's movement. Everybody just pissed about 'the way things are.' I believe that the people who subscribe to rp are intelligent enough to know that what they are saying is untrue; th…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 04:34 AM
0

You'll never see your grandchildren.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 11:43 PM
-7

This is the most delusional thing I've ever read. Feminism has nothing to do with eliminating masculine traits. Ridiculous.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 11:30 PM
3

Susan B. Komen was the sister of Nancy Brinker (wife of Norman Brinker of Chili's and Macaroni Grill fame) When Nancy's sister died of breast cancer, she (Nancy) decided to create a charity to attempt a cure of breast cancer. Starting very small, with 5k races, the thing just mushroomed. I believe it started in the 80s. Yes, it has gotten huge. I have heard that they donate only 20% of their proceeds, but I don't know if this is the truth.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 11:20 PM
0

My experience has been that different people like different traits in other people. I also believe that men and women choose partners that look like either themselves or their family (check it out-it's fascinating.) So, to me, there's someone out there for everyone, not just 'alphas.' When I was single, the more 'alpha' a guy was, the more unstable he was mentally. Many men who are very successful have more than a touch of crazy in them; I ran into a couple of rich, handsome pathological liars. …
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 05:57 PM
-4

I always hear the word 'catty' used for female aggression, yet I only have experienced men doing this to other men. Most women are pretty benign and friendly toward each other. But (at least at work) the men are totally vicious when speaking about other men, usually when they feel passed over or when they think someone hasn't earned what they received. I think 'catty' is used for the tactics women use to get things done; people who lack power generally go about things in a circuitous way because…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 02:12 PM
0

The sex you are defining is just a physical encounter; most relationships are far more than that. If you can't tell that your partner is sleeping with other people, you can't be all that close. That's not a relationship. If you are single for any length of time, you can have several good relationships; some lasting a lifetime, but they are not simultaneous. I feel very sorry for young men these days if rp is taken seriously. It misses all the important segments of a relationship in an effort to …
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 02:00 PM
1

It doesn't mean that these "partners" were strictly casual sex. It is possible over the course of 15 years to have several relationships-some lasting a lifetime.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 01:45 PM
-31

I don't see how a lot of partners means your heart has been broken and damaged. Maybe not. Maybe she's a very attractive girl and can do what she wants. As an older female, I must say I have never come across anyone, male or female, who has had fewer than, say, 20 partners. When I read statistics about people having an average of 7 partners IN A LIFETIME, I can't believe it. How can you go through your 20s and maybe 30s and be with so few people? I think everyone lies on these surveys. Or they a…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 03:34 PM
-19

Most traditional cultures had their mores dictated by MEN, so of course they wanted a virgin for marriage. Nothing to be insecure about if a girl has no previous partners. Women jumped through those hoops because men had the all resources, not because it was a great idea. The equivalent opposite would be: every man eligible for marriage has to be a multi-millionaire. I get RP and the message, but sometimes, either for youth or inexperience, you completely miss the point of why things happened. I…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 03:22 PM
0

I think actually, that men are the ones who cannot control their emotions. Every bar fight I ever saw was between 2 men. Also, think of the crimes men commit; the prisons are full of them. Think of how many kill wives, girlfriends and cohorts because they can't control their emotions. Every man I ever knew was highly emotional-they just don't call it 'emotional' because it's considered a female stereotype.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 05:35 AM
1

The most powerful men are also the most emotional. Emotions are the steam engine for positive activity. You have to get over the idea that emotions are some uncontrollable negative whirlwind. They are the seed of human invention and accomplishment. This idea that men are not emotional is a silly trap to stifle your energy. Just let it fly.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 05:04 AM
2

"Lunatic" is from the word "luna" or moon. In ancient times, people thought basking in the moonlight made you crazy. There are actual paintings of people going looney dancing in the moonlight. It is not related to the menstrual cycle.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 03:03 PM
1

If men are older as fathers, there's a greater chance of autism and schizophrenia, which gives it a double whammy.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 12:26 AM
1

35 is still young enough to have a family. From now on, she just has to make sure she meets a lot of good men to select from, otherwise it could take forever.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 12:12 AM
1

Just because "The Wall" exists in your head, doesn't mean it exists. I think TRP likes the idea of the wall because the readers are so anxious for women to lose their value, after having been rejected for so long. A person's value always increases with age. Money, stature, authority, career success, expertise in sports all usually increase as one matures. Just stay thin and you're OK.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 03:18 PM
-6

Um, when my wife is a 'nasty-ass 50 year old' I'll be a nasty-ass 55 year old. We can grow nasty together. Also, I hardly see how someone holding your penis between their teeth is submissive. I would say it might be the most powerful place on earth.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 01:37 PM
-6

It's ridiculous to think that 30 (30!) is too old to have everything you want. The reason she's not attached is the fact that she may not be meeting enough men to find the right one. I mean, you have to meet 100 men to find a couple that you like, so she needs to try to find ways to have contact with lots of good quality men. One will click with her sooner or later. (When you're in college you're surrounded by single guys the same age as you, but once you're in the working world there's not a wh…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 04:27 PM
1

When I was 38, I would have considered a man of 50 a grandpa. No way would I date someone that old.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 11:37 PM
1

That has not been my experience or the experiences of friends back when I was single. If you click with somebody, if they are more fun and interesting and captivating than anyone you've met, age doesn't seem to come into question. Especially if it's less than 10 years. Men that I knew didn't really talk about a woman's age (like a car!) And almost everyone who asked me out in my 30s was younger. Go figure. (Most single people are in their 20s, so you wind up dating them.) And marrying one.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 03:58 AM
2

Well, I'm thinking of advertising, banking, dentistry, just regular professions. Advertising took a nosedive in the 80s, banking was prestigious maybe 20 years ago...lots of professions that previously blocked women out were glad to have them after the male exodus.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 03:48 AM
1

Hmmmm maybe if you've had a lot of partners you know there's another one right around the corner. If you don't get much attention before marriage you may cling to the fish you landed even if it stinks.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 03:37 AM
1

There are millions of happy marriages in the (dare I say it) baby boomer generation, and they were the Woodstock generation, where 10 partners was a just good weekend in the Hamptons. There were generations before you where sex was healthy and normal for both genders. This ridiculous study is hogwash. Besides, how would you know if your husband was a good lover if you never had many before him? Instead of trying to get him to improve, you might think that that's all there is to sex, and give up …
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 03:19 AM
-1

The idea of a 34 year old being a "used up bucket of twat" is an idea that TRP concocted, so the rest of the world doesn't think that way. Women are just coming into their best years at 34-it takes time to get yourself established. And, forgive me, but I don't understand the anti-education idea along with the anti-alimony idea. It's one or the other, monkeyboys.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 03:28 AM
1

You're almost right. Women tend to enter fields that men have already abandoned, either due to lack of good money or fading status.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 12:51 AM
1

None of these girls is even close to fat. If you've ever seen yourself on film, it does make you look even heavier than you are, but even so, no one here is fat.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 12:30 AM
1

That's ridiculous. You may not have witnessed life in the 50s and 60s, but it was dismal for both genders. The restrictions have loosened up for everyone. But for women, there had to be a change. The life they were living was mind-numbing and unproductive, a life that was impossible to maintain. And, aren't men also submissive to their bosses in the corporate hierarchy?
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 01:25 AM
3

I must add to this article: Men with IQs below 55 also outnumber women 8 to 1.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 01:12 AM
1

Men gravitate toward the fields that produce the most status and respect. Women have no need of this, although some may desire it. This author overlooks the tidal wave of social conditioning that comes with living in a particular culture. Would men become scientists if it made them seem gay or weird or wimpy? No-they'd avoid it like the plague. Well, for women, we are made to feel like strange outcasts if we venture into certain territories. Also, in ancient times, everyone who was healthy hunte…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 12:51 AM
9

Most of the time Mr. Perfect does show up when you're 30 or 35 or 40. Men also have careers and goals to achieve before they settle down, and most seem to gravitate toward someone their own age. The whole idea of being washed up at 30 is ludicrous for men or women. After 30, most people say what they mean and mean what they say, and it's a great relief after the blurred lines of the 20's. It gets better as you go.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 12:30 AM
1

I can't give you a percentage, but I would bet the majority of women wished they had never gotten married. When you are submerged in a household with husband and kids and never ending work, you envy these women.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 01:24 AM
2

But they did it without raising children simultaneously...
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 11:15 PM
0

I've always read that the gender math gap was mostly a myth. The majority of men and women are the same in math. The very top percent of the best math students are male. The top English/verbal students are women. When they compare SATs, I think the difference is a couple of points.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 04:25 PM
-1

Yes, I agree. But the 60's and 70's eradicated the idea that a person's "number" is important. It was thought of as retro, illogical and subjective. Personally, I've always been interested in this topic. Who, I wonder, keeps track of another person's sex partners, and where is the tipping point? Do her lover's take a number (like in Baskin Robbins) and when it gets to, say, 50, a bell goes off? Who is counting, and are they a reliable source? They always say men lie about their conquests, so how…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 02:20 PM
0

Well, a woman has to keep up childcare, as she usually gets custody. Also, kids don't sleep or play with toys most of the day. Even if they do, you've got to be right on top of them in case they do something dangerous or crazy. Men contributing money is just helping with the cost of the kids. I read(albeit, a long time ago)_ that only 14% of spouses continue child support after 2years. I don't know if this is true, or ever was, but a man can stop payments, but a woman can't stop childcare. She w…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 02:03 PM
-2

The whole 'slut' revival came about during the aids epidemic. Before aids and stds, there was no such thing as a 'slut', male or female. Sex was considered healthy and normal for either gender, with or w/o marriage. Then along came the 80s and all these diseases, and sex became something that could kill you. Thus, having lots of sex became irresponsible, and now we're back in the 50s. Too bad that lovely window between The Pill and AIDS is gone.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 01:53 PM
0

Hook line and sinker. Older women w/o men are the happiest people in the population. The hard work is behind them, and these are their "power years." (not my phrase) If most had the choice to marry, they would refuse. Marriage is a ton of work and hassle for a woman, and the only way to do whatever you want (for someone of any age) is to be single. Mother nature also cooperates, and frees you from Tampax and childbearing. Who could ask for anything more?
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 06:32 PM
-8

Oh, and by the way, the 'grass hut' thing was said by President Ronald Reagan, only he said "If it weren't for women, people would be running around in skin suits and living in grass huts.." He meant it as a jokey way of saying women are responsible for many of the refinements in civilization. I don't believe the TV show for a minute. Every woman I know is so resourceful and handy, I can't imagine that this wasn't a staged joke.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 07:51 PM
-3

All women, even feminists, know this. It goes without saying, as it is so obvious. The lunatic/genius thing has been known for ages. Camille Paglia is a feminist old-timer who is known for being a bomb-thrower to call attention to herself. She was a troll long before trolls were around. What she has to say is not news at all; she just always acted like her thoughts were some great revelation. She was very big in the 70s.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 07:41 PM
1

Not all women have the height thing going. I always thought tall men looked out of proportion at times (look at basketball players. Their heads look too small) Shorter men have better bodies-they get a better "V" in the torso. And they are known to be taller where it counts. I have 1 brother who is 5'7" and he always had girls chasing him. Besides, it's hard enough to find a guy you like; if you add a height requirement, good luck.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:57 PM
2

That's the funniest thing I've ever read.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:47 PM
1

No one ever left for that reason. Most men understand the above, and if they like you, they want to hang with you, with or w/o sex. And sexual tension is a wonderful thing... I had a lot of interests; skiing, fishing, weight-training, I played guitar and sang in different clubs, competed in horse shows, had a good graphic design career going, was a good fine artist...I even wrote a column in the Dallas Morning News for awhile. I always thought being a fun companion and not a pain in the ass was …
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:40 AM
1

Why, oh why would you tell your daughter her value is mostly tied up in her looks? Looks have no value-what you DO has value. Looks are a roll of the dice-they are not an accomplishment. They are just how you were born. Accomplishments are things that you actually achieve. Stick with your second paragraph.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 06:39 PM
1

Find out what her passion is and help her achieve her goals. Show her how to be brave, how to ignore social conditioning, and how to forge her own path. Women swim upstream still, and you can help her be herself, and be brilliant. Show her how to stand her own ground, not be anyone's doormat, and help her get as much education as possible. Let her know men are the gravy, not the main meal, and that she can do it all herself.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 06:28 PM
5

Women explain things much more than men do. It's the teacher in us. Many men have to have their knowledge pulled out of them. I find that men who explain things seem to review the topic in their minds beforehand, and wait for a situation where they can sound brilliant. The truth is, no one likes to listen to anyone. If you're a self-righteous gasbag, forget it.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 06:06 PM
1

He means he's rich enough for her to work outside the home or not work, as she chooses. What's so bad about that? Hitchens, though I loved him when he was alive, was a fat drunk. He knows he couldn't keep up with a child. I don't see the big conflict in this. And I'm pretty feminist. Sometimes TRP guys over-analyze too much.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 04:51 AM
1

He's letting someone blow him on the first night they meet? This makes HIM a whore in my book. Yuk.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 04:39 AM
0

The most competent corporate people that I've worked with have been female. The most insecure? Male. The men I've worked with hoard information, are sloppy with schedules and are basically terrified of losing their status/level in the company. Sometimes it's downright funny. Believe me, men have no monopoly on competence.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 04:05 AM
1

Hmmmm... There are a lot of men stronger than you in the world. Are you inferior because of it? Of course not! How can anyone be so obtuse? Equality doesn't mean doing the same things, just as it doesn't mean doing the same things in a man's world, between 2 men. Men have already sorted this out; a bantamweight boxer doesn't fight a middleweight. It doesn't mean he's a worse fighter, just a smaller fighter. He could be a much better fighter than the bigger person. Bigger is the way you're born, …
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 12:08 AM
1

Hey, great article. I'm female and I just found out I'm an alpha male.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 11:57 PM
1

When a man pressured me for sex, I used to say, "I'm not ready for a serious relationship..." That usually stops them in their tracks. Married now, but remember it well.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 11:11 PM
1

If a woman finds out she really doesn't like a guy, or she doesn't get along with him, she would much rather drop him w/o having had sex with him. If you sleep with your date early on, and then find out he's a total douche, you may wind up sleeping with lots of people you don't even like. I always waited 3 months. By that time the newness wears off and you see the real person, then you can deem him worthy or not.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 10:50 PM
1

You are looking at maybe 5% of being female. There is so much attempted gender channeling and "suggestions" made to women by supposedly normal people. If you want to be an independent, happy female you must fight daily to keep the assholes off your back. We have a much wider spectrum of choices in life (men walk a narrow line) but you must constantly and courteously throw off the bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 05:55 AM
0

I don't get the hostility. Having a baby alone is frightening-no woman in her right mind would do it deliberately. You can abort or you can seek assistance from family. If these aren't possible for any reason, what is wrong with helping these women? Men have traditionally skipped out on their kids, so, what is so wrong with this charity. Some young women can earn enough to have the baby and do OK, but many can't.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 05:32 AM
-25

2 things are logically wrong with what he said. He's implying that a woman's worth comes from a man's opinion. (Women may think you're an idiot-that doesn't mean you are one.) I am smarter at 10 than I was at 5; I am smarter at 50 than I was at 40. Everyone improves with age. Here's the twist. If a woman's youth is necessary for childbirth (which it is) that makes her time more valuable than a man's. Which means he is the supplicant in trying to win her time. Things come back to bite you in the …
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 10:34 PM
1

Most women admire others who are gifted in any way; I swear, I've never come across all these crazy 'syndromes' that I read about here. Women would come up to me on the street and tell me what a great figure I had, they were always asking me how tall I was and how much I weighed. I don't recall any crazy jealousy-but my body was more natural, not pumped up. On the beach, any girl around me would always say "You look so great-you are so lucky!" Maybe I just didn't flaunt it. Oh, By the way, Tyra …
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 11:11 PM
1

No one has ever said women are as strong as men. Even the most confident woman knows that. It's not an insult. If women are 11% muscle, and men are 25%, you can't compare the two.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 10:58 PM
0

Rape is gross, but death is permanent. I'd definitely live with rape rather than be gone forever. Any woman who thinks she doesn't have sexual power is just missing the point. Women have ALL the power.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 10:47 PM
-1

I have many female friends-none are "insane." I do know plenty of men who are aimless, have drug or alcohol problems, gamble, and generally have no mission in life. They are emotionally fragile.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 10:33 PM
1

Many women now are super-smart and very accomplished in many ways; their careers, they play sports, are great musicians, artists, engineers, and are basically high-quality people that are tough to beat at activities they've been honing since childhood. This doesn't mean they are mean and crabby-just hard workers. Alpha females want to be appreciated, just like high-quality men.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 07:52 PM
0

Domination is not sexy-it's brutish and gross and a girl will withdraw from it. Captivation is the aphrodisiac. A woman wants this guy to be so driven mad by her utter uniqueness that he can't control himself. These 2 things may look the same, but they come from a completely different place.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 03:37 PM
1

A woman wants to completely own and captivate the man she's with. If he's lukewarm, she's ok, but if he completely loses it over her body, face, and her whole self to the point where he can't control himself, then that woman has won your soul. She's got evidence that she owns the recipe that brings him to his knees. Congratulations!
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 03:27 PM
-3

I have been lurking on trp for some time. I don't get what this guy is so mad about. Did he expect sex for favors? For friendship? If red pill guys disapprove of females having a sex life (cock carousel) then why make it a point to try to get sex from women? Isn't that contradictory? Are you all mad because you don't get the girls at a party? Isn't that like women hating the prettiest girl in the room? Everytime I read posts on this website, I can't quite undo the backwards logic, even though I'…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 01:04 PM
-1

But you wouldn't be capable of doing that if there weren't someone at home taking care of your children and raising them. Your wife's sacrifice enables you to make that shit ton of money.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 03:03 PM
2

If you don't understand the above post, then you have twisted your thinking so much that you cannot see the truth or logic of marriage and children anymore. Stopping work to take care of children is a sacrifice; a mom who does so is putting herself in a very precarious financial position. It is short-sighted to think that stopping work to raise a family is some kind of advantage to a mother. It is jeopardizing her future for the good of her husband and family. I seriously doubt someone's IQ who …
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 02:53 PM
1

You are describing the world in which females live; their jobs have no effect on their value, hence, less ambition. And of course, they have that built-in occupation, people-making.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 11:11 PM
0

They don't hate those girls (I don't know where this idea came from that women don't like women...) They know that younger women are more easily taken advantage of. But the younger women are probably having a blast leading him around by the nose-soooo easy to do when you are very young!
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 11:01 PM
3

Someone told me if you work hard you'll be successful. Not really. If you work hard, someone has a better chance of taking advantage of you.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 10:44 PM
0

The point of any movement is to have it's goals become so much a part of everyday life that it's no longer recognized as part of a social change. Women who are successful w/o "feminism" probably don't realize where the seeds of their success came from. It's hard to believe, but when I was in college a married woman having a job was considered "radical feminism" out to insult her husband, and imply that he couldn't support her. People argued if women should even have a job at all. Daycare was non…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 10:34 PM
1

I never see this 'evolutionary' fact on TRP. As long as men do not have the ability to bear their own children, they must go to the other gender in order to perpetuate their genes. As long as they need to go through someone else for the purpose of children, they will always be in a one-down position, competing with other men for the privilege. That is entire crux of the inequality between the genders. Men have the burden of their incapability, women have the burden of bearing the young. Boom.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 02:16 PM
1

If you don't believe in social channeling, you're very naïve. It's happened to you with red pill. It's happened to both genders as long as people have been on the earth.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 02:06 PM
2

Who, I mean Who, cares about free drinks? Who doesn't have a few bucks to buy drinks? Some poverty case? If men barrage her with drinks, isn't that the men's fault, not hers?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 01:55 PM
1

I think women start looking their best at about 30...looks start to fall away in the late 40's, early 50's for females. Many women don't come into their looks until they are older; your face thins out more and you (finally) have visible cheekbones. I would say that if you don't look gorgeous at 40 or 42 you've either been a drug addict or have an eating disorder. Men don't age well due to the universal pot belly that they all seem to get after 35. And the loss of hair is tough to live with, too.…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 01:45 PM
1

I keep reading about 'rape accusations?' Why would anyone claim rape when it wasn't true? There's still a stigma surrounding rape victims, so why would anyone falsely say they were raped? It's like saying you bought the Brooklyn bridge-what is there to gain? This is a serious question-not a joke. BTW-the vast majority of crimes happen to men; the robberies, murders, assaults, etc. here in Dallas it's about 90%. Also, the vast majority of rapes are attempted rapes; about 86% of the time, the woma…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 01:27 PM
1

I have been lurking for awhile. Almost every time I read TRP it sounds illogical and backward. Anything that goes wrong in a man's life on TRP is due to 'feminism.' But Feminism is only 1 thing, and 1 thing only. Let me say it in different language; it means not being shut out of any occupation or activity you wish to participate in due to gender. That's it. It is not opportunism, it is not female chauvinism, it is not unfair advantage. These are right-wing concoctions that have infiltrated the …
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 01:09 PM
0

None of the signs those women held up has anything to do with feminism. They are too young to know what it really is.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 10:30 PM
-21

You didn't have those kids. She did. There's wear and tear in a marriage that has nothing to do with money, and bearing children is one hellacious part of it. Are you glad she had those kids? Do you think they're worth a little sheetrock and paint? Or does it all come down to your little paystub?
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 05:05 AM
1

Many of the laws you are talking about came about because "women's work" was largely discounted as not real work, and having no value. When child-rearing, homemaking, meal planning and preparation, etc. were given value, men were asked to compensate for all those years of unpaid labor. Looking at it in dollars and cents, esp. in 2014, it seems unfair, but there was a time when divorce meant poverty (or close to it) for women. Remember, women have only been out in the workforce for roughly 50 yea…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:54 AM
0

This sounds like an older couple with one foot in the traditional world, where in a 'normal' marriage the man provides money and the woman provides children, child-rearing, housework, food, and general quality-of-life work in the home. In the new world, women have access to money, and contribute financially, but many feel that their blood, sweat and tears type of work counts as much. Devotion counts. I believe this woman could work longer, but it doesn't sound like her husband really loves her a…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter