TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

roundpounder Archive

View 3 posts and 103 comments by roundpounder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

damn
/r/MGTOW28/01/20 04:48 PM
2

You’re supposed to get her venmo, request $1000, and hope she’s too dumb to notice.
/r/MGTOW05/01/20 01:34 PM
3

Femininity rewards toxic masculinity. Femininity is evil too.
/r/MGTOW11/12/19 11:20 PM
0

Stupid propaganda post.
/r/MGTOW15/10/19 04:26 PM
1

Yeah. And pickier. And have a much easier time breeding.
/r/MGTOW31/07/19 02:48 PM
1

Well yeah, that’s what I meant.
/r/MGTOW30/07/19 08:36 PM
0

Can you change biology?
/r/MGTOW30/07/19 08:24 PM
-7

Okay. It’s biology.
/r/MGTOW30/07/19 12:57 PM
-7

Men are more disposable. That’s just nature. Just face it.
/r/MGTOW30/07/19 12:14 PM
1

Some people just aren’t meant for LTRs. Some people get preyed on easily.
/r/MGTOW22/07/19 01:31 AM
1

Physical requirements are a sign of low sex drive. Such women are defective.
/r/MGTOW19/07/19 04:50 PM
1

I made many posts but here is one: https://www.reddit.com/r/Braincels/comments/80yl0s/just_an_informative_post_many_women_out_there_are/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 01:38 PM
1

Look on this sub and on /r/braincels. It’s quarantined. Also look on /r/trufemcels
/r/MGTOW23/06/19 11:38 PM
1

Look up “autogynephilic lesbians”. I’ve explained it many times in this site. They’re extremely common.
/r/MGTOW23/06/19 10:17 PM
1

Ya. A woman who is only sexually and visually attracted to and aroused by other women.
/r/MGTOW23/06/19 05:52 PM
1

Yes. All the time.
/r/MGTOW23/06/19 01:34 PM
1

No, they lack a penis so they have sex with men in order to get off to themselves.
/r/MGTOW23/06/19 06:41 AM
2

I would Eiffel Tower her.
/r/MGTOW23/06/19 04:16 AM
4

Just realize that many men want to be this.
/r/MGTOW27/05/19 12:42 AM
1

Inverness has cosmic squid monsters though.
/r/MGTOW18/05/19 12:13 PM
-2

NO!!!! This would cause so many more problems for the majority of men in society. The top 5% will impregnate left and right with no deterrence.
/r/MGTOW17/05/19 08:07 PM
-2

Robber, not rapist.
/r/MGTOW07/05/19 11:36 AM
1

Hey deja. Do all the work.
/r/MGTOW26/04/19 02:58 AM
2

Upvote!
/r/MGTOW16/04/19 10:55 PM
1

I would enjoy cleaning her vagina with a high-powered hose.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 04:55 PM
1

Lmao. I actually like the gossip part.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 02:46 PM
2

Fuck, I hate that so much.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 01:17 AM
1

Autogynephilic lesbians. I hate their existence.
/r/MGTOW07/04/19 01:03 AM
22

The 80/20 rule is misleading and gives too much credit to women. Any given woman is only attracted to 5% of the male population. It only works out to 80/20 in aggregate.
/r/MGTOW02/04/19 06:31 PM
3

Tenacious.
/r/MGTOW01/04/19 01:41 PM
15

I'm pissed cause I can't do the same thing.
/r/MGTOW26/03/19 12:10 AM
5

She’s a lesbian.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 09:36 PM
2

Fuckin dykes
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 02:37 AM
2

Fuckin dykes.
/r/MGTOW19/02/19 11:11 PM
5

Wording could have been better. White college kid had a broken arm and called a black guy “nigga” without thinking because he was drunk. Black guy was drunk too, got angry and tried to pick a fight with this guy who already had a broken arm. This all happened in a high-crime area, so this could have gone much worse. He should have been more aware of what he says, given his surroundings.
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 06:46 PM
13

I asked one white guy if a store was open and he said no, nodded towards a nearby black guy and said “this nigga here just told me they’re shut down for the night”. Both were drunk and a fight almost started. The black guy was following the white guy around for 2 minutes trying to start something, and the white guy was semi-disabled at that point. Lesson of the story - be aware of your surroundings when you say nigga.
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 02:03 PM
1

We should upvote and promote this shit so much that there is a massive backlash.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 04:06 AM
12

Replied to wrong person
/r/MGTOW24/12/18 02:10 PM
8

Link?
/r/MGTOW24/12/18 01:32 PM
1

Glad this dyke is going broke.
/r/MGTOW21/12/18 03:01 AM
6

Women are just not attracted to men much at all. They deserve to be with someone ugly.
/r/BlackPillScience20/12/18 09:32 PM
0

“western”, “Islamabad” This is a fake story written by a halal curry
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 04:02 AM
-1

She was assassinated by the CIA for threatening to reveal info about Roswell.
/r/MGTOW13/11/18 07:02 PM
1

She’s right. Feminine men get approached by masculine women.
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 10:15 PM
-1

Third world immigration would save Europe from this idiocy.
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 02:20 AM
1

Nobel Prize is an insult at this point.
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 02:19 AM
1

Perhaps it prioritized the passenger over the pedestrian. If so, nothing wrong here per se.
/r/MGTOW31/08/18 02:05 PM
1

Nothing wrong with cheating on these women.
/r/MGTOW31/08/18 10:29 AM
3

I applaud her for simping these simps.
/r/MGTOW20/08/18 01:38 PM
18

It’s an unfortunate side effect of biology. Women are naturally attracted to sexually successful alphas. In the same way, sluts are seen as more sexually attractive to men. The higher sex drive of men allows most to avoid being tempted to settle with sluts.
/r/MGTOW20/08/18 01:16 AM
3

She’s hot as fuck but they both idiots.
/r/MGTOW20/08/18 01:12 AM
2

Been a long fucking time since I read this but I gotta day it - repost. Anyway: 1 - ~30% of women are actually literal lesbians. They somehow haven’t realized it and still have sex with men. 2 - Other more normal women simply have lower libidos than men do.
/r/MGTOW17/08/18 04:11 AM
1

I noticed that lesbians tend to have pedophile male relatives. Is this genetic?
/r/MGTOW16/08/18 08:23 PM
0

That's what I mean. Whiny betas get banned.
/r/MGTOW15/08/18 12:33 AM
1

Why is she hot!?
/r/MGTOW14/08/18 06:40 PM
7

It’s a bitchy comment. Never appear like a whiny beta. Let this be a lesson.
/r/MGTOW14/08/18 06:35 PM
1

Photoshop. His hair is in the same place
/r/MGTOW14/08/18 02:17 PM
2

My penis is sad.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 09:16 PM
2

Damn. It’s actually over for Witchercels.
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 01:14 PM
1

Trademarks
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 04:16 AM
2

Bag over head!
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 04:07 AM
4

Too busy dealing with their acquired health problems to reproduce.
/r/MGTOW26/07/18 03:13 AM
5

Natural selection at work - these people won’t reproduce.
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 10:49 PM
1

Who isn’t?
/r/MGTOW23/07/18 12:56 AM
2

How did this idiot become a vet!?
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 01:40 AM
23

Lips curled back and teeth apart - ready to bite. Normal closed-mouth smile - submission. So cuck face is a threat. I got it right.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 10:33 PM
11

So cuckface is a threat?
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 10:16 PM
10

I’m guessing some Saudi wanted to shit in her mouth.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 09:45 PM
2

She’s a real man.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 02:08 PM
3

You mean tears her son apart chunk by chunk and throws him in the dumpster.
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 04:31 AM
6

Always the tiny girls.
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 01:01 PM
1

She’s right. A regular sized dick couldn’t even reach her.
/r/MGTOW13/07/18 02:56 AM
52

I did not know that.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 05:20 PM
0

Upvote.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 02:44 PM
130

This wasn’t a sacrifice, it was a mistake. He should have left 12 canisters. His life is more valuable than some kids’ momentary possible discomfort.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 02:44 PM
1

I prefer it this way. She should let me do what I want and not interrupt me.
/r/MGTOW07/07/18 12:59 PM
5

I know one woman who got into a highly physical field like this accidentally. Interesting work, but no guys are interested in her cause of it. She doesn’t have the option of working while pregnant.
/r/MGTOW07/07/18 12:53 PM
1

Women love being controlled and piss you off into doing that. Nothing new here. Or just more typical self-destructive SJW morons.
/r/MGTOW07/07/18 12:46 PM
4

Dumb. If anything, he should be thanking her for rejecting him.
/r/MGTOW29/06/18 08:05 PM
2

She’s not a regular pedophile. She’s a lesbian. She did this to turn herself on. Stop breeding with them.
/r/MGTOW26/06/18 03:27 AM
1

Not unless we can at least grope them.
/r/MGTOW15/06/18 02:34 AM
-10

Who the fuck complains about this? We should encourage this. Women should grope us more. Just no saliva or other infected fluids.
/r/MGTOW27/05/18 01:59 PM
1

Anita sarkeesian still bangable. I blame her for trump, but the way she trolls autists and thunderf00t is hilarious.
/r/MGTOW26/05/18 02:27 AM
1

Men are naturally more expendable. Makes sense.
/r/MGTOW26/05/18 01:11 AM
1

They watch lesbian and tranny porn. They’re all hormonally deficient autogynephillic lesbians who get off to themselves. Evolution is crazy.
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 09:48 PM
1

Well, it’s true. That’s how tinder worked out. Men swipe right on everyone who isn’t instantly ugly, or else they don’t get matches. Then they think a little more about who they matched with later. Women rarely swipe right because they always match. So it usually ends up with the guy thinking about which girl he should spend his time on, because he already passed that filter for the girl.
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 09:38 PM
4

Good. Fuck those murderers.
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 09:14 PM
1

This is absolutely true. While most red pill methods would probably work on them, they usually don't require any of it in the first place so RP methods don't make men much more attractive to them. The methods I'm referring to only apply to short term goals. Only low libido women require them to become interested in a guy for the short term. I have no idea how long term things differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 04:21 PM
1

we absolutely do. women only SEEM to sometimes have higher drives because they don't need to perform with their vaginas. men have to actually perform with penises. We could masturbate 5-6 times a day, just like some women, but realistically can only get hard enough to have actual sex 2-3 times a day max. That's why you may not believe it. Plus the more we masturbate, the more stimulation it takes for us to get aroused. After 2-3 times, we might have higher requirements in a girl, looks wise, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 04:10 PM
1

ok, it's not a theory, but it IS perfectly fine as a hypothesis. Maybe not a hypothesis that can acquire funding, since it's not based on previous research, but it's still a valid hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 05:01 PM
0

while questions are often obtained from previous results, it is perfectly ok to have a question that you are testing first. It's perfectly fine to treat everything I posted as a hypothesis that needs to be tested and statistically verified. I admit calling it a theory is wrong since it's not verified, but it's perfectly fine to have it as a hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 04:58 PM
1

Massive lesbian panic about being left for a man? I'm starting to get the sense that you just watched a lot of movies or something to come up with your "theory". - I just got this impression from stressed out forum posters. I have no idea if this anxiety is more widespread. I'm only addressing one aspect of human personality. It may be a simplistic model, but so far, I've never had a result that actually disproves a prediction. BTW, I'm going about this very informally and unscientifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 02:12 PM
0

ok, in the first paragraph, I said that I have used my model to repeatedly predict results. I said this because I misunderstood your previous comment. in the edit, I said that many actual scientists form and believe their own views of human nature and behaviour even if they're not psychologists. It's something everyone simply does. I did not base this theory off of my own formal research or any previous psychological research.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 01:56 PM
0

I did, and so far, it's never failed. This is a very simplified version of the model. I just never used formal research. You don't always need science to come up with a working model. Instinct is generally reliable, because if it wasn't, we wouldn't be alive. We existed, developed, and grew without actual science for hundreds of thousands of years. Edit: What I meant was that many actual scientists consider themselves psuedopsychologists if they are not psychologists.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 03:16 PM
1

my last comment was entirely in response to NonaJabiznez but anyway, is there anything in there that describes you? If not, then what needs to be added? Your definitions may be different but I'm sure you've experienced some of the feelings described.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 01:12 PM
0

I did not base this on any research and actual scientists do that stuff all the time. Maybe not psychologists, but everyone else. Btw, if some research out there is full of shit, it doesn't mean that all of it is full of shit. What makes you think new studies are better? You realize that trying to control for more variables, likely what new studies do, can screw up results by magnifying the effects of remaining confounders?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 01:08 PM
0

edit: sorry, just saw that you're a different person. I edited my reply and added a lot of other details. From what I've seen, they're not just worried about a bisexual leaving them for a man. How is it different from leaving them for a woman? Also, my descriptions are all based on real people. the ones that you say are not lesbians, have always fit my description in one way or another. some of them are not lesbians. some are bi. some are even straight despite dating women. others don't fit any …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 08:33 PM
1

"Have you ever actually talked to women about their desires, orientation and what they are attracted to?" yes do you know how much bullshit there is in science? the mountains of bullshit papers and studies? especially in psychology? "You read a bunch of blogs and reddit posts and decided that you are now a modern-day Freud?" lol, who doesn't do this
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 08:02 PM
-1

you know lesbians who call themselves lesbians. I'm not talking about them. Isn't there a sort of massive panic within lesbian circles about being left for a man? The assumptions are very broad, which is why I posted. of course there are going to be minor variations on what each person feels, especially in the part about being attracted to promiscuous people. This involves things like introversion/extroversion, disgust, perception of health, and other aspects such as neoteny and cuteness, as wel…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 07:50 PM
-2

All of us are programmed to find those who desire us more desirable. This is also why we are more attracted to people who seem highly sexual, we think they are more likely to be attracted to us. But they aren't the only people we are attracted to, and among them, we still have physical standards. What you say may be true for some women, but as evidenced by Red Pill members, that's not the only source. A girl may not be attracted to a guy who's interested in her for various reasons. So while she …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 05:45 PM
0

I misread another flair as Science, when it was actually Debate, so I changed the flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 05:26 PM
-1

If it was, then I would have selected debate, but I don't want a heated debate, I want well-thoughtout replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 05:21 PM
-1

Never said I was doing the science. I'm presenting something as a topic for science.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 05:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter