~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Getting any girlfriend/plate is not your problem.Unfortunately, this is not true. Not even close. One of the rude awakenings men go through it the realization that they can be rich, smart, healthy, drive a fancy car, wear nice clothes, etc. and still will get rejected by fresh-off-the-boat uneducated 40-yo single-mom recovering junkie ex-prostitute waitresses. And that once they get their shit together, gain a little patience, and assert themselves, they can get it on with gorgeous young wealthy smart women about as easily. If downgrading your… | /r/TheRedPill | 20/09/18 10:56 PM |
| 3 | Weekend FR - Fucking a Girl in a LTR, Hamster Overdrive (Screenshot)You promised no sex in writing. I don't know how it went after that, but imagine what could happen if the b/f caught her? Or if at any time in the future she decides (trustworthy woman that she obviously is) that she wants to blackmail you. You're taking a lot of risk. > Yesterday she asked me to fuck her again and I declined; too busy In writing? Excellent. & Lucky. | /r/TheRedPill | 05/09/18 07:15 PM |
| 1 | Guide to Google Drive: How to protect yourself and stay organizedAlso possibly useful -- recordings are legal & fully admissible if there's no expectation of privacy. A conversation had in a restaurant or bar surrounded by other people, e.g., doesn't normally require consent to record if other people present could potentially hear the conversation. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/12/17 03:54 AM |
| 5 | Guide to Google Drive: How to protect yourself and stay organizedIllegal as primary evidence. But it is admissible to impeach testimony: [the exclusion of illegal recordings] 'cannot be construed so as to confer upon a testifying witness the right to commit perjury' source: was advised this by a lawyer once. Where I was, you can illegally record a conversation, and then save the recording to bring out only when/if it's to your advantage if someone lies in court. Then you'll have to eat a fine while they face perjury. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/12/17 12:11 AM |
| 3 | Women always lie because they don't want you to know the truth about them.All it did was amplify the same elements on the face What exactly would you expect a deep net trained on before/after applying foundation to do? universal effect applied to bitmap Nah, that wouldn't even align changes to faces. You could train a facial recognition AI to align things the way instagram filters put dog ears on people, but the effect would have awful artifacts along the edges if you used it just to apply manually designed filters. Check out https://deepart.io/ to see a very cool exa… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/11/17 09:56 PM |
| 9 | Women always lie because they don't want you to know the truth about them.Pretty sure the app does indeed work by your #2 method, using deep learning techniques to automatically figure out the kind of things that need to be changed to go from real made-up pic to real no-makeup pic via training. Of course the result isn't "real", but in some sense it's at least realistic. I don't know why so many people assume otherwise. What you're assuming in #1 would actually be extremely difficult with current technology to accomplish with any sort of realism. #2 is actually very e… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/11/17 06:15 PM |
| 2 | Man creates "sexist, misogynist" app, MakeApp, that shows what women look like without makeup. Rage ensues.The description says: MAKEAPP uses neural network technology to digitally add or remove makeup from any face. There's widely available code in several public AI toolkits to already do this with things like painting styles (make my picture look like Van Gough, e.g.), so that's not nearly as complicated to do as it might sound. I just played around with it, and given the results (really very good, but I find it also aged a couple of 23yos I tried it on so they look 30. Which was also interesting),… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/11/17 12:01 AM |
| 8 | Man creates "sexist, misogynist" app, MakeApp, that shows what women look like without makeup. Rage ensues.Hmm.. If they're using a trained deep learning algorithm, I don't think it's accurate to call these "fake filters." Rather, it's actually guessing what they'd look like without makeup based on the average effect of many true before/after filters, in an intelligent way. Which we couldn't have done 5 years ago. And 5 years from now some other program will do it much better. But the state of the art is awfully good. Which is exactly what it's sold as. | /r/TheRedPill | 15/11/17 11:38 PM |
| 5 | Putting the seat down. How to win the war.One of the dumbest things in Western culture is having the shitter in the same room as your toothbrush & shower. And there's zero reason for it -- it doesn't even save space, wastes water (google image search "toilet sink"), and you can't use it while somebody's bathing. | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 07:23 PM |
| 1 | Got Oneitis? Move On - Jocko Willink spills RP truth after RP truthThanks. Exactly the message I needed right now. | /r/TheRedPill | 29/04/17 09:00 PM |
| 9 | Make audio recordings of your sexual encountersIANAL, but I've been told by one in a different context: no, it's not admissible as evidence of innocence. yes, it's admissible as evidence of perjury. Which means, as best I can tell, as soon as the false accusation is made, the tape goes into evidence, and the person's case goes bye bye. And then you'll face a fine for wiretapping. edit: lawyer's being lawyers, I highly doubt it's actually this simple. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/04/17 12:26 AM |
| 5 | As soon as he sells his companies, his wife leaves and takes half the money.Never again seeing one's children, & having to live abroad as a fugitive for the rest of one's life. That being said, the 'stay & work through the process' option contains the risk of finding yourself in prison should you not be able to make payments, or if you start to 'win' the divorce and your spouse decides to use all available means to 'get back' at you. | /r/TheRedPill | 29/03/17 05:25 PM |
| 9 | As soon as he sells his companies, his wife leaves and takes half the money.It only cost him a few years and half his early life fortune Nope--she took half, but Alimony + child support will use up the other half. If he uses or somehow loses that savings, he risks missing a payment & going to prison. On the other hand, if he's incredibly lucky & hard working & starts making even more money, she'll go to court & raise the child support. In theory it works the other way around, if he finds himself unable to make money, but in practice it doesn't work out in family court (… | /r/TheRedPill | 29/03/17 05:06 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter