TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rtechie1 Archive

View 0 posts and 181 comments by rtechie1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

And George Floyd's death had nothing to do with him overdosing on a fuckton of meth and heroin.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 05:20 PM
4

A 19 year old man would have gotten years in prison for this.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 05:17 PM
9

I agree that she should be held responsible for the man's death if there is evidence that the trauma she caused to his brain resulted in or quickened his death, but it is important to acknowledge that it wasn't her intention to cause his death. Who the fuck cares? This would get her 10 years in State prison minimum in the USA for manslaughter. The fact that she was piss drunk makes it even worse.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 05:16 PM
11

6 months of curfew for a murder? The UK is just ridiculously soft on violent crimes. But God forbid you send a mean tweet!
/r/MensRights04/04/22 05:11 PM
3

Was she harpooned?
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/22 12:47 AM
26

The wage gap doesn't exist. If you account for the facts that men take more difficult and dangerous jobs, and that men typically work longer hours, the "wage gap" disappears.
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/22 06:14 AM
2

I don't think so. It is technically an issue, but trans people, despite all the media attention, are still extremely rare. There's also the simple reality that most trans people (either way) don't 'pass' well enough to really fool people. Most people know what they're getting. This is more of an issue for feminist and lesbian 'activism'' nonsense. MTF want to be included in issues like abortion, which affects them directly less than anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 08:18 AM
9

Lesbian dating is famously extremely difficult due to the tiny dating pool. Lesbians are already rare to begin with (2% of women if you're being generous) so that pool starts out tiny if you're anywhere but a HUGE city like NYC or LA. It's all but impossible in a small town. Add to that the problem that lesbians tend to have longer term relationships than straight couples and the pool shrinks even further.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 05:47 AM
2

Can she die fighting for her country? Pretty sure some of those boys bled for 5 days and didn't die.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/22 08:03 AM
1

Such light sentences are typical in Western European countries.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/22 10:06 PM
1

Executing pedophiles is extremely moronic and counter-productive. If you execute people for child rape that encourages child rapists to murder their victims to destroy evidence. What have they got to lose?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/22 10:03 PM
7

The subreddit has gone private.
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 06:26 PM
2

Link.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/22 05:32 AM
5

That's what the Muslims do. I believe they circumcise around 13.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 11:58 PM
2

There is a specific subreddit for this: /r/intactivists
/r/MensRights02/02/22 11:56 PM
2

I've heard Karen Straughn say "When terrorists are allowed to choose their victims they avoid female targets". Does anyone have the source of this claim? She's almost certainly referencing the fact that women in general, especially mothers, are much less likely to be victims of all violent crime. 75% of violent crime victims are men, only 25% are women. And if that woman has a child with her it drops down to less than 5%. Another redditor pointed out that terrorists often choose military targets…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 09:46 PM
1

It’s because they are consistently told the opposite to make them feel better and to, usually, to both buy more things and stay in the jobs markets paying taxes and associated costs It might benefit companies selling them shit, but it doesn't benefit them in the long run. Then of course there is nearly a weekly article now telling them that the “fertility cliff” is a myth. More money pumped in due to fertility sessions and IVF / egg freezing / embryo freezing. And I’m pretty sure there is some c…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/01/22 07:45 PM
3

This behavior is rooted in the fact that women tend to be much more anxious / neurotic in general than men. Men are expected to project confidence so because they appear more confident, women subjectively view them as safer. Never mind the actual crime statistics. The way women react to male victims of sexual assault is similar. Men generally try to remain stoic whereas women are more likely to emotionally crumble, so women percieve that it doesn't happen as often to men and it's 'not as bad'. D…
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:12 PM
7

What is she even trying to spell with those finger tattoos?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/12/21 07:24 PM
36

Yeah, huge red flag. There have been a number of studies which show that American women generally have a overly high opinion of themselves. Most notably the studies on dating apps which show women consistently rate 80% of men as "below average" in appearance (with men it's 50/50 as you would expect). Worse, they don't seem to grasp how much men generally favor youth so their value is steadily decreasing and there's really nothing they can do about it. The longer she waits with her high standards…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/21 09:34 AM
1

No, it's a courtesy towards women. That's why you open EVERY door. And it's not really chivalry, it's a subtle form of flexing. By opening a door for a woman you're indicating to those around that this is YOUR woman, you don't necessarily open the door for random women. (Well I, open the door for random strangers, including men. But I'm nice that way.)
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/21 09:23 PM
3

This woman appears to have a lot of shitty tattoos. That, her outfit, and the fact she's waving a gun around leads me to suspect she might have gang affiliations. There's a chance someone in the neighborhood is gunning for her and that's why she's this paranoid. Assuming it's not completely fake / staged.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:35 PM
1

I definitely have more than one dollar.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 01:24 AM
0

So you “don’t give a shit” about appearance and know next to nothing about improving yours yet still think your opinion is valid? Women value power, usually in the form of money and social status, more than appearance. Talk to professional matchmakers and see what they tell you. “Women care about money as the most important period” then why do I know tons of guys, myself included that got more ass than a toilet seat without spending a single dollar? The broke-ass losers you hang around with are …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 12:36 AM
1

I will say, though, that there is a surprisingly large minority of men who do participate in their looks They're called "poor". Usually "stupid and poor".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 10:04 PM
1

Buried in the comment section of these posts are women saying “if you knew what it took to obtain this level of beauty you wouldn’t say it was by default” That's called "bitter". She's upset she's judged on something she can't control. She can complain to all the short men in the world. These women are 100% correct, and I don’t think most men can say women don’t care about their looks and that women are much more specific about money than looks. I don't believe "most men" claim that "most women"…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 09:47 PM
1

It's worth noting that the Jedi and even the Sith have far a far greater percentage of women fighting than any 21st century Earth military.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/21 05:54 AM
1

This flyer seems to be from the UK. The person who created this flyer supposedly to protect women is almost certainly dead set against women having any sort of weapons to defend themselves. If this person really gives a damn about women's safety, why aren't they advocating for concealed carry?
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:04 AM
1

I think it's a dystopia to treat women LITERALLY like they're retarded children. If that stupidity is "reasonable", why isn't Islam correct? Why shouldn't women cover up and have male guardians when out? The whole point of of these rules is to protect women from sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:01 AM
2

Islam is right about women.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:56 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/l2l4mu/4chan_doesnt_understand_the_lack_of_good_men/gkb2i92/ And? Is your point that Eastern European women lose their virginity at about the same age as Western women? Because that isn't true. My sister lost her virginity at 11 and that was typical in her peer group. Her peer group was wealthy white girls in California, BTW. However, Western men simply no longer prize virginity the way they used to because they know about paternity tests. …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/21 05:34 AM
1

It's not idealized, it's reality. Eastern European / Asian women are generally more demure than American women. American women are generally more demure than Danish or Australian women. And I was thinking more in terms of economics. The average Eastern European / Asian sees Americans as more desirable due purely because of wealth.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/21 05:37 PM
2

I'm not sure inappropriate touching rises to the level of "sexual assault". Nobody seemed panicked.
/r/PussyPass25/03/21 02:42 AM
3

Other than the money part, there is an army of women in Eastern Europe and Asia who would leap at that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/21 03:52 AM
11

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/gayle-newland-trick-friend-sex-pretend-man-jailed-six-years-prison-cheshire-court-a7850936.html
/r/PussyPass24/03/21 01:08 AM
18

Her premise is flawed. Anecdote: I'm a bisexual man. I used to hang out at a lesbian biker bar regularly because they were the only place in town that would show the pay-per-view boxing fights. Plus the bartender liked me. I was usually the only man there. This does not mean everyone else was a lesbian. It was common for straight women to come along with a lesbian friend for a "girl's night out". What these straight women quickly discovered was that as soon as they got drunk, their lesbian frien…
/r/PussyPass24/03/21 01:05 AM
12

That's likely a "black people hair problem". Black African hair is typically in tight kinky curls and is difficult to work with relative to the hair of other races, so some black women in the USA choose to cut their hair very short and just wear weaves and wigs. Black men in the USA typically just cut their hair very short. And those that do have longer hair often opt for something relatively low maintenance, like dreads.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 09:57 PM
1

I wonder how many of those perpetrators are men vs women? Your point? Women typically commit violence through proxy so even if most of the perpetrators of violent crime are men, women still bear a lot of responsibility. Is that completed suicides or attempts? Completed. It's well known that men more likely to use a more lethal method of suicide attempt and thus complete suicide at a higher rate Because women really aren't trying. Suicide attempts by women are typically cries for attention. For t…
/r/MensRights15/03/21 11:37 PM

That's what Garbo is doing when they give bad information.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 11:25 PM

Falsely accusing people of crimes is still illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:05 PM

You explicitly can't opt out because I'm sure it's part of Garbo's model NOT to contact the "suspect" to avoid libel lawsuits.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 05:19 PM

Lundy Bancroft studied domestic abusers and he said the one thing they all have in common is that they think the abuse is justified, that they are just defending themselves. In at least 75% of straight domestic abuse cases the abuse is mutual. That goes up to 85-90% among gay couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 05:16 PM

See my top level post. This scheme is likely illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 05:12 PM

You think women will choose men w records? 😂 Some? Absolutely. Are you not aware of the phenomenon of women who become penpals with convicted criminals in prison? I know several women who have done this. There are also women who skim sex offender web sites looking for dates. I know women who have done that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 05:11 PM

This business is probably illegal. What Garbo appears to be doing is NICS criminal records database search. That database is restricted and can only be used for very specific purposes, such as a Federal security clearance. Digging up dirt on potential dates isn't one of them. On top of that Garbo is obligated to contact the person they are doing the NICS records request on AND detailed information on who is requesting it. There's also no way this is even slightly accurate without an SSN. What Ga…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 05:07 PM
6

But some euphemisms can be laughable. This woman's real problem is that she's irritated that the English language doesn't have a celebratory phrase which lauds a woman who has lots of sex She would be wrong then. There are multiple gendered female terms for this: babe, Cassandra, hottie, philly, vamp and vixen come to mind. A non-gendered term would be "player".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/21 04:31 PM
15

The term "retarded", which is a medical term, is the politically correct replacement for the earlier medical terms, "idiot", "moron" and "Mongoloid". These terms refer to people with Down's syndrome and certain other birth defects which cause reduced mental function. Regardless of what they're called, kids will make fun of retarded kids. Including other retarded kids. Kids are cruel. And that's a GOOD thing. The petty cruelties of children prepares people for the harsh reality of adulthood.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/21 04:24 PM
14

A few more stats: 75% of all violent crime victims are men. 75% of suicides are men. 75% of homeless are men. 90%+ of all people in prison today are men. 90%+ of all workplace fatalities and injuries are men. 95%+ of combat fatalities are men.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 01:19 PM
6

I'd turn this around on women. Studies on dating apps have shown that men consider about 50% of women as "above average and 50% of women as "below average". What you would expect. But women consider 80% of men to be "below average". See the problem? The actual problem is a phenomenon called hypergamy. Women, across cultures, typically refuse to marry a man with a lower socioeconomic status, and by 40 most women in developed countries have achieved significant socioeconomic status, so they want a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/21 06:34 AM
26

Your assumption is wrong though. Because men die younger there are fewer men, and men tend to marry younger women, so it trickles down. So there are always more single women than men. As another redditor pointed out, there are just as many men as women in Korea. It is a well-established sociological fact that most women worldwide practice hypergamy. It's as well-established as anything in sociology. That's why this problem (increasing numbers of unmarried women over 40) is found in most develope…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 01:56 PM
19

That wouldn't work. It's very easy for young, single men to relocate to another country. About 80-90% of immigrants globally are young, single men.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 01:47 PM
21

The actual problem is a phenomenon called hypergamy. Women, across cultures, typically refuse to marry a man with a lower socioeconomic status, and by 40 most Korean women have achieved significant socioeconomic status, so they want a man that's the same age (40s), handsome, AND with a high status. A tall order. Men typically don't care about socioeconomic status. They're typically looking for a woman who is healthy, young, and attractive. A 40+ woman simply can't provide that. And that handsome…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 01:45 PM
78

I'd turn this around on women. Why don't women, in general, have a moral responsibility to cater to less attractive men? Are you aware of the 80/20 rule in dating (women, in general, consider 80% of men to be "below average")? The actual problem is a phenomenon called hypergamy. Women, across cultures, typically refuse to marry a man with a lower socioeconomic status, and by 40 most Korean women have achieved significant socioeconomic status, so they want a man that's the same age (40s), handsom…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 01:43 PM
2

The "date nice guys" advice is about having unreasonably high standards. Are you aware of the studies about attractiveness on dating sites? Consistently (this has been replicated several times), men rate about 50% of women as "below average", which is to be expected. Women consistently rate 80% of men as "below average". Do you see the problem? There is a consistent social problem where women are encouraged to date only handsome men in their 20s, often men with poor financial prospects, and then…
/r/PussyPass14/02/21 01:16 AM
1

Research the meaning of the word "incredible".
/r/PussyPass14/01/21 09:24 AM
0

If you believe prisoners should be tortured, why shouldn't they be tortured even more than mere confinement?
/r/PussyPass14/01/21 07:53 AM
1

If the reason why murderers shouldn't be executed is to torture them, he's advocating for torture. I'm logically extending the reasoning. Another redditor used the "torso" example, arguing all her limbs should be severed.
/r/PussyPass14/01/21 07:25 AM
1

If the reason why murderers shouldn't be executed is to torture them, he's advocating for torture you fucking moron.
/r/PussyPass14/01/21 07:00 AM
4

Does it hurt you or anyone else if she does? Yes, as a taxpayer keeping her alive costs me money. Keeping her alive also causes emotional pain to the family and her surviving victim. Is the victim any less dead if the perpetrator is tortured or killed in retribution? What good does it do society? Sure, some amount of punishment should exist to deter criminal action, but at what cost? Prison is not a particularly expensive way to contain people. You're arguing for summer camps and mental hospital…
/r/PussyPass13/01/21 11:02 PM
-1

If the supposed reason why we shouldn't execute criminals is because that's "too good for them" he's simply extending that reasoning to it's logical conclusion. What's your argument for why people like this woman SHOULDN'T be horribly and constantly tortured?
/r/PussyPass13/01/21 10:55 PM
-6

Do you believe this woman should have been absolutely horribly tortured, repeatedly and constantly raped, clitoris amputated, eyes gouged out, fingers amputated, teeth pulled out, force fed on a daily basis, etc.? If not, why not?
/r/PussyPass13/01/21 10:52 PM
-3

Do you believe this woman should have been absolutely horribly tortured, repeatedly and constantly raped, clitoris amputated, eyes gouged out, fingers amputated, teeth pulled out, force fed on a daily basis, etc.? If not, why not?
/r/PussyPass13/01/21 10:51 PM
11

And you have video recordings of all of that happening, do you? Obviously there's no possibility a convicted baby murderer would lie to portray themselves as more sympathetic. I mean their only incentive is avoiding decades in prison.
/r/PussyPass05/01/21 01:52 AM
2

This woman was strong enough to stab a man 193 times and then dig a hole in the backyard and then carried this man out to the backyard and buried him. Few women are strong enough to actually do that, most women who commit murder have a man assisting them. It's very difficult to believe this woman couldn't defend herself from spousal abuse.
/r/PussyPass04/01/21 03:21 AM
6

Because the feminists are lying hypocrites. It's a proven fact that feminists, like women in general, prefer 'chads'. Tall, handsome, traditionally masculine men. The same feminist that complains about 'toxic masculinity' puts 'must be over 6' tall' in their dating profile.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:35 AM
8

/r/Feminism and related subs run bots that auto-ban redditors for posting in other subs, despite that being against reddit sitewide rules. A recent addition is /r/ActualPublicFreakouts.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 09:02 PM
1

Some people do this argument actually The only time when I've ever heard an argument like this is when I was donating at a sperm bank and I was told I would be popular due to my genetics (6'5", blonde hair, blue eyes, high IQ).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 07:48 AM
5

It's easy to find studies that claim female circumcision has medical benefits, including reduced transmission of STDs (quite likely if the vagina is stitched shut). Do you endorse female circumcision?
/r/MensRights06/12/20 04:41 AM
1

Nobody really makes the argument that people should reproduce to "spread their genes". Childfree is a bad idea for personal reasons, not grand biological ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:53 PM
1

Well they do monitor a handful of physiologic readings. The readings themselves aren’t falsified the machine. It’s just that the readings are utterly meaningless. I suppose that's technically accurate. But it's entirely snake oil. It would be no different than using a thermometer and claiming you can tell someone is lying based on tiny temperature variations. There is no physiologic response scientifically correlated with lying, so the whole thing operates under a false premise. So I agree with …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/20 12:31 AM
1

You can’t actually “fail” a polygraph by itself per se. Polygraphs don’t detect lies, but abnormal vital sign changes associated with your answers to the questions, Polygraph machines literally measure nothing. They are almost literally an empty box, the dials and graph and widgets are literally just for show. See my higher level post. Polygraphs are literally just a confidence trick.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 07:08 PM
1

I had a top secret in the Navy and never had one. Never saw anyone else getting one either. I've had a Top Secret SCI. By now the Pentagon knows polygraphs are bullshit so if you make a stink about it (I did) they'll waive them. Also, a LOT of the "red flags" thet used to show up in security clearances (like being gay or smoking pot) aren't a big deal anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 07:06 PM
-2

I was extremely nervous, have panic attacks all the time, my heart rate is wonky from Graves Disease, blood pressure issues.. so this factors played a HUGE role in the results. No they didn't. Polygraph machines literally measure nothing. They are almost literally an empty box, the dials and graph and widgets are literally just for show. See my higher level post. Polygraphs are literally just a confidence trick.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 07:02 PM
6

Polygraph tests are 100% completely fake pseudoscience / scam. They literally measure nothing. The way polygraph machines "work" is a confidence trick. The operator convinces the subject that he has a magical machine that can tell when someone is lying and then TRICKS the subject into making admissions. For example, they ask the subject "Have you ever stolen anything?" and because almost everyone has stolen some small thing at some point if the subject says "no" the operator will accuse them of …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 06:59 PM
2

Are you aware of the 80/20 rule in online dating? Numerous studies have shown that in online dating women regard 80% of men as "below average". Men consistently regard 50% of women as "below average". If you know anything about statistics you can see the problem. As an example, many women insist that anyone they date must be at least 6' tall. The average height of a man in the USA is 5' 9".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/11/20 07:19 AM
1

The older I got the more uncomfortable I became with any sort of physical contact because as I matured I realized how wrong it was for her to let me see as much of her as I did for so long. This is called 'shame'. It's not a good thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 06:23 AM
0

Can you give an example of the anti-Indian bias in /r/India? I'm seeing a couple of heavily upvoted posts critical of the BJP and Modi, but the BJP isn't India. EDIT : A letter.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 06:16 AM
1

But you prove that the true purpose of this subreddit is try to use this made up concept of "female privilege" to excuse the wrongdoings of men. I'm not familiar with the Indian legal system, but in the West women are given enormous deference. It's near-impossible for a pretty young woman to go to prison for anything, including murder, regardless of the evidence. There are countless examples. It's also extremely easy for a pretty young woman to press a false rape claim if they want. But in the U…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 06:09 AM
1

Nothing in that article describes HOW these cases were determined to be false. It only gives one example of a maid who "admitted" she was lying. What was the actual process that led to that admission? It is incredibly rare for a victim to retract even false claims in the West, and according to the article women won't be punished for lying (same as in the West), so why did this woman, "admit" to lying. Sounds to me like this maid was coerced somehow.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 05:52 AM
0

there are actual more false rape cases than actual rape in India... just for your reference... https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/false-rape-cases-in-delhi-delhi-commission-of-women-233222-2014-12-29 Fake rape allegations are not "found to be false", that never happens in reality. A 78%, acquittal rate doesn't mean the claims are 'false', it means that either prosecutors are corrupt and throwing the cases (likely), the prosecutors are completely incompetent, or there is some unreasonabl…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 05:45 AM
1

And? I suppose people can fap to the Venus de Milo if they want, but that doesn't change the fact that it's legitimate art appropriate for young children.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 05:27 AM
3

Agreed, body painting is pretty common among nudist families. Parents will paint the kids, kids will paint the parents. It's supposed to be non-sexual, like most nudist activities.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 05:24 AM
-4

That was apparently a love triangle, nothing to do with the Army per se.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 12:18 AM
1

https://youtu.be/a9z8F4fgj6Q
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/20 06:51 AM
56

Trivia: The vast majority of women (80%) opposed women's suffrage at the time because they assumed it meant registering for the draft. Remember that the US was just coming off of WWI at the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 04:53 AM
8

Cocaine is a helluva drug.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/20 04:50 AM
5

If this is real there are likely kids in the picture, which may factor into why he's willing to put up with this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/20 01:36 AM
4

Relative to a chimpanzee yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 08:37 AM
29

If you look at other mammals, like our relatives chimpanzees and orangutans, human breasts are absolutely massive. That huge structure is absolutely not necessary to provide milk and there is a huge cost in energy and mobility from creating those structures. So why? Biology tells us that structures that don't have an obvious environmental reason are always the result of "sex selection", mates preferring that structure. The classic example is the peacock's tail. Human males also have inordinately…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/20 05:00 AM
1

That sounds like a joke, but it's not. While it's widely recognized that men have more body strength than women, it's less well known that men are vastly better at the specific act of throwing punches than women. Doing tests with punch force testing pads, even 10 year old boys can consistently beat grown women who outweigh them by 100 lbs. Why this is is unclear. From what I hear it's a combination of anatomy (structure of bones and muscle) and hormones.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 08:39 PM
1

I haven't done a lot of research, but my guess is that this is actually more reporting and enforcement (these are upscale schools). IOW, there is more going on at other schools they're just not being caught.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/19 05:00 AM
3

I suspect this woman isn't actually that ambitious and has rich parents, because I'm not sure how she can be this clueless about money. As a self-described real estate investor, Translation : I'm a landlady. I inherited real estate from my family which is run by a management company. I do basically zero work. These people are fairly common in California due to the very high rents. I can think of several women I know in the SF Bay Area who are the same.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/19 12:07 PM
3

Isn't she kind of abandoning her brand here?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/19 10:37 AM
8

It's more common than you think. In grade school I was a bit of a "teacher's pet". In 6th grade near graduation my social studies teacher asked me to stay after class, she locked the door, and then started kissing me and undressing. It didn't get much farther than that because my mom started asking around when I didn't show to get picked up. Most days I walked home which is why the teacher wasn't expecting it. In my junior high, there was a notorious lesbian PE coach that was arrested for molest…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/19 10:25 AM
1

Anyone know where this is? Could be in Slab City, an encampment of squatters in the desert south of Los Angeles.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/08/19 04:22 AM
2

Behavior like this is really common where I live (SF Bay Area), though usually not this blatant. You'll see tons of dating profiles where women at least imply they want an expensive gift on the first date or in advance of dating. This is an extension of the "going out on dates for free meals" behavior. I think all women do this to some extent but one of my cousins was awful about this, she did this with most of her meals and would often "dine and dash". She was worse than most because she had th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/08/19 04:12 AM
5

Well it would work currently as Trans people aren't allowed in the military. They could prosecute anyway claiming you were faking being trans to avoid the draft (which would be true).
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:32 PM
2

I think I agree with the lower self-esteem but I’m not sure about the depression, especially in adults. I think there might be a lot of moody teenage girls, but they tend to grow out of it. Serious adult depression that leads to drug abuse, suicide, etc, seems to be more of a male problem IME.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 08:48 PM
2

I would argue there are sometimes complex situations around breakups, “taking time off”, marriage separations, etc. and “cheating”. If you’re in an ambiguous relationship status I don’t think you’re necessarily obligated to tell the other person what you’re doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 07:30 PM
1

“The perception that Asian men don’t treat women well” .... any asian man will tell you this is a perfect example of racism against him. Is pointing out the fact that 75% of all black children are born out of wedlock, and 90%+ of mixed-race black children are somehow racist? And if you want kids maybe you'll factor in those stats? Do you stats to present that demonstrate Asians have the same or lower rates of domestic abuse vs. other races? Certainly my anecdotal experiences working with police …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 09:19 AM
2

It’s called “money”. There is also the perception that Asian men, despite having money, don’t treat women as well. Don’t ask me to explain why black women strongly prefer black men, as also seen in the OkCupid data. Though all ethnic groups prefer white men at least as their second choice, with white women showing a similar strong preference for white men. Black men are the most likely to date outside their race, with an almost even split between white, black, and Asian women. Another fun fact: …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 02:00 AM
5

Hilarious given that Munn famously took to the casting couch with Brett Ratner and is generally notorious as a starfucker and talentless hack.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 12:01 AM
2

Does anyone have any information on where this money is going? Apparently, #TimesUp is a "legal defense fund" run by the National Women's Law Center., which appears to be a women's rights lobby group. So it looks like, in reality, the money is going to go to pro-choice lobbying, etc. not anything to do with sexual assault per se.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 11:42 PM
3

You downplayed the most important part of this a bit. The money. If you do a bit of digging, Weinstein made his high-profile accusers BILLIONS of dollars.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/17 08:27 PM
1

Like all dating advice, contradictory: "Bea a regular" and "try new things all the time".
/r/MensRights09/11/17 03:47 AM
1

Mexican culture (which you seem to be hinting at) is notably quite macho.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:31 PM
1

Because it's true. Sexual maturity for boys is fixed at about 16, for girls its tied to ethnicity and how healthy they are. Modern people are very healthy, so girls get their periods earlier. For black American girls age 9 is is not uncommon. This is reflected in the law in some countries. In Congo the age of consent for boys is 18, but it's 13 for girls.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:55 PM
1

My understanding is residency at the same address, like having a utility bill with the spouse's name on it. But you can substitute other evidence, like a paternity test.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:50 PM
2

Consummation is in fact a legal requirement to immigrate to the USA through marriage. If consular officials really believe the marriage is fake, they may make you do something to prove it. It also comes up in divorce proceedings, non-consummated marriage can be annulled in many states.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 12:58 AM
9

Can someone please describe the video in text? As described in the title, the link sounds like child porn and I suspect many people will be reluctant to click it.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 12:51 AM
33

Has law enforcement been contacted? This behavior breaks a number of laws. Has there been any attempt to get her committed by family?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:22 AM
1

In the USA. Infant circumcision is unpopular outside the United States, South Korea, and Israel.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:28 PM
1

Who do you think the Muslims got circumcision from? There is no way to avoid the accusation of anti-Semitism since there are plenty of Jews willing to say that any restriction on circumcision is anti-Semitism.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 03:21 AM
2

Judaism, the religion that prides itself on teaching people you ask questions You're kidding right? Jew: "Why do we have to follow all these silly and arbitrary rules?" Rabbi: "Because God says so."
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:56 AM
1

In fact, circumcision is considered anti-Christian by most denominations. It's "Judaizing", or forcing Jewish practices onto Christians.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 11:46 PM
0

Because in the USA it's largely Jewish doctors pushing circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 11:42 PM
1

I've been reading some of your posts. You're extremely narrow-minded. You seem to really believe that every person regards sex the same way you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 06:00 AM
1

Men don't have vaginas. You can disbelieve all you want, I've seen this firsthand. Sorry that your stereotypes about women aren't universally applicable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 01:09 AM
1

No, I got your point. You don't like casual hookups and you seem to believe all other women think the same way. Do you know what a "glory hole" is? Do you know there are women who do that unpaid? You're wrongly assuming everyone has the same sexual preferences as you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:44 PM
2

Your personal feelings do not change reality. Not liking something does not make it not exist. And you aren't all women. Obviously some women like casual hookups. And maybe you're super hot and get lots of attention from men and don't understand how a less attractive woman might actually be flattered by such offers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 11:25 PM
1

But they ARE options, even if you don't like them. Men don't get many choices at all and most of them are ones they don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 10:37 PM
2

"turboautists"? And what makes you think autistic people are more likely to be violent or abusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 10:31 PM
1

He's better at spotting deadbeats than any woman could possibly be because he's not blinded by desire. Every single 30+ man can tell you about multiple women they know where EVERYONE in their life told them the man was a deadbeat, but they married him anyway because of his looks / he was nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 10:28 PM
1

Fix your profile (which probably says something like "I want to have fun") and don't use Tinder which is EXPLICITLY for casual hookups. If you're getting hundreds of messages like that on OkCupid or Match.com your profile is garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 10:01 PM
1

So if you think someone is unattractive you literally stop caring about their opinions?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 09:51 PM
1

The phenomenon is completely real. I go back and forth between SF Bay Area and Austin, TX and women are VASTLY more demanding in the Bay Area due to the 60/40 male/female ratio. I spoken to women who expect a $1000 gift on the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 09:50 PM
1

Why are you assuming 99 out of 100 of those messages are from men that want a one night stand? As many as 50% of people will never have a one night stand. It's far more likely that 99 out of 100 are looking for a long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 09:46 PM
1

Why is it ever appropriate to say "fuck you" to someone who is speaking to you nicely? It's just rude. I don't care if you're "scared".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 09:35 PM
1

There is no way an insurance company could keep millions of genetic tests secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 09:27 PM
5

After studying and working your ASS off to get into the STEM field why would you put that at risk? That's exactly why this is worse in STEM than in many other fields. Women report much the same thing in the legal profession, for much the same reason. And who is more likely to sue than lawyers?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:50 PM
1

I agree, I just think the traditional "patriarchal" model is better than a parental surrender model. I also object to 'safe harbor' laws. I don't think child abandonment is a good solution.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:47 PM
4

That's not a "subsidy". If it were, literally all payments of any kind for anything are "subsidies". And I notice that these supposed Christians hate that their tax money is indirectly related to abortions, but they don't care one little bit that their tax dollars are used directly to kill thousands of people with bullets and explosives.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:19 PM
1

Planned Parenthood receives a ton of Federal and State funding and would have to shut down a lot of facilities without that funding.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:13 PM
4

Why shouldn't it be a Federal issue? Economy of scale means Federal funding is more efficient for bulk services like grants. And State funding doesn't really work well for anything anymore because almost all the tax revenue and profits come from a handful of states like California, Texas, and New York. They have lots of money, but Oklahoma sure doesn't.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:12 PM
1

Abortion is medical care. If you're opposed to public medical insurance like Medicare, fine, but most of us don't want poor people dying in the streets from easily treated illnesses.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:09 PM
9

/u/verdis is confused. The issue is women (and men) losing access to medical care provided by Planned Parenthood like pap smears and contraception. 92% of Planned Parenthood funding does not go to abortion. Eliminating all Federal funding for Planned Parenthood will reduce people's access to these health care services. Eliminating all Federal funding for Planned Parenthood is something the Republican Party has wanted to do for a long time.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:06 PM
-4

Equal rights. That means male parental surrender. No it doesn't, it means "put a ring on it". We didn't used to have this problem because men didn't have to pay child support for illegitimate children. Just change it back to "marriage is required for child support". Rape is a special case and there could be court orders for that.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:01 PM
54

There is no "tampon tax". What they're talking about is that tampons aren't exempt from sales tax and they want them to be because they are "essential items" unlike say, shaving razors for men. Though I would add condoms to that legislation as well.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:55 PM
6

An abortion "paid for by the state" is just state provided healthcare aka Medicare. Are you opposed to Medicare? Should poor people who get sick just die in the streets?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:49 PM
11

One of the biggest problems women in STEM complain about is a lack of mentoring from men because men are afraid to be alone with them due to fear of sexual harassment claims.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:43 PM
5

This is less about men's rights and more about the incredibly corrupt justice system in India.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:18 PM
4

To summarize the article: Cuts to legal aid in 2012 have increased the number of people representing themselves. Figures from the MoJ in October 2016 reveal that in 80% of family court cases, at least one individual had no lawyer. Currently, women who can prove they are victims of domestic violence are entitled to legal aid if they cross a threshold test. Emphasis added. So, in essence, the Guardian is complaining that men are allowed to have a defense in family court.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:46 AM
12

Talk to her about how the education system is rigged against her son. This is a big one. Both my sister and ex-wife became a lot more supportive of men's rights when they saw how modern schooling was affecting their boys.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:37 AM
5

I've noticed that a lot of people on this forum have a policy not to discuss their MRA beliefs with others, they keep it a secret. This is because many of those who go public in any way about being an MRA are falsely accused of sex crimes (that's why so many public MRAs are women).
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:35 AM
1

Says someone who thinks calling black people "people of color" isn't racist but calling black people "colored people" is racist. Hint: White is a color. You can argue that it's not a primary color, but then neither is black. By separating black people from white people you're "othering" black people who have more in common (both genetically and culturally) with white Americans than actual Africans.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:33 PM
1

it was her sensitive and emotional side that got her so many dates. It was during the dates things fell apart Yes, because women say they want sensitive and emotional men but in real life they almost always reject them. being a lesbian is easier for her. And it's easier because it's tough for her to follow the gender expectation of male aggression.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:47 PM
1

The harmful effects of the female image is one of the main reasons feminism exists today. Then why don't feminists do anything to change that image? Can you provide me a link from a feminist encouraging women to be more violent? (No, that's not a typo. Women being nonviolent is part of the "female image".) Link? Just about any MRA website has numerous articles about physical and mental health problems that are either unique to men or men are the most common sufferers. I don't even know what that…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:42 PM
8

The problem is that feminists generally discount any harmful effects of the "female image" and ignore the reality of the "male image". A MRAs talk about the mentioned groups, especially disabled men, vastly more than feminists. You're the ones that support disposable men and the school to prison pipeline.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 07:39 PM
7

This is the standard line of "that's just her and says nothing about the general experience of men/women". I disagree, I think there are at least a few things that can be universalized. The idea that sexual attraction for men and women are different, with men it's physical and viceral and with women it's mental, women fail to understand the affects hostility and rejection have on men making approaches, and even though women say they want men that are sensitive and emotional, in reality they reje…
/r/MensRights23/12/16 07:36 PM
2

This 20/20 segment is over 10 years old now.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 07:24 PM
1

This 20/20 piece is 10 years old.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:53 PM
-3

It's a bad law. California needs more judicial discretion and shorter sentences, this is the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:18 PM
0

You edited out this bit: Jane Doe's blood alcohol concentration was measured in a hospital several hours after the assault at 0.12%, and doctors estimated her intoxication level at 1 a.m., the estimated time of the assault, to have been around 0.22%, So that 0.22% is just an estimate, the measured level was 0.12. Point being that he was intoxicated, at approximately the same levels she was, but she wasn't charged with anything.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 04:49 PM
-2

The source would be court transcripts. Do your own research. Get them and cite them.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 04:37 PM
10

This new law disallows parole for those convicted under existing law Wrong. It disallows probation for any new offender whose victim was "either unconscious or incapable of giving consent due to intoxication". The idea being to close the "loophole" that allowed Brock Turner to get less than the 3 year minimum. Basically, this is a "tough on crime" law that removes all judicial discretion on rape cases. It's (more) draconian. The US needs to be putting fewer people in prison for shorter periods, …
/r/MensRights03/10/16 04:29 PM
3

It's not even clear that objectification even exists, because it's really just philosophical speculation. And on top of that it's not even being used correctly. Objectification isn't "men treating women as objects" but "women thinking of themselves as objects due to media portrayals or self-objectification".
/r/MensRights10/08/16 02:58 PM
2

Anti-nuclear rhetoric comes from the oil industry. Who funded "The China Syndrome"? Who funds the biggest anti-nuclear groups, Public Citizen and NIRS. The oil industry.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 06:14 PM
3

Puberty blockers do a lot of good to alleviate that (although it's really just a placeholder for HRT). If the person is never going to pass, HRT and GRS may not be the best strategy. I mean, anti-depressants have a lot of side effects too, but nobody is proposing we don't treat depressed people with them. I think they're wildly overprescribed. I've had severe depression. I didn't take drugs, I made lifestyle changes. Body acceptance only goes so far. Sometimes it's the best strategy. We don't tr…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 07:56 PM
2

All they do before that is delay puberty via puberty blockers, which is the safest approach Clearly doing nothing, i.e. no blocking therapy, is the medically safest approach. That has to be weighed against suicide risk, but it's not clear that this approach would actually make transperson less prone to suicide. There's a strong argument for body acceptance.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 07:14 PM
1

Insanely, I risked being expelled for the same thing (having long hair). And I had literally the highest grades in that school. I was lucky to be smart and just started attending college (at 14) where I ran into far more supportive faculty that didn't care if I was an angry punk rocker. I got scholarships on merit and I was surrounded by "diversity" people that had no idea what the fuck they were doing. I spent most my college career helping inept Asian Computer Science students. One of my favor…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:11 PM
6

She can't just make albums of white noise, they have to be real songs and critically she has to tour and promote them. I suspect that's what she's really pissed off about, Sony requiring her to tour constantly.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:38 AM
1

99.99% of the death threats on the internet are from, literally, children aged 10-12. They are absolutely not serious. The primary problem here is not real, but psychosomatic. You feel scared because of the comment, not because of any actual danger. That's why it's very important to believe that every single person without exception posting a death threat is a 10 year old boy using his Mom's computer. This is like thinking people saying "I'm gonna rape you!" in an online multiplayer shooter (lik…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 07:07 PM
1

No, he's just not interested in the mountain of science that says otherwise because it contradicts his belief that free will is absolute and gender is malleable.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:43 PM
1

Then why bring up those two examples? The experiences of transpeople say nothing about gender relations in general due to the general bias against transpeople. IOW, The reason these male-to-female transpeople were treated more poorly at work was because they were transpeople, not because they were female.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 09:12 PM
1

cases of transgender men much preferring the treatment they get as men than they got as women There's nothing here that rules out the overwhelming bias against transpeople.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:56 PM
3

The dynamics of lesbian relationships are completely different. For example, mutual interests are much more important.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:49 PM
1

Saying "I just don't think it's the huge deal that some people make it out to be" downplays the criminality of mutilating a child. Children should NOT have a "right to choose" to be mutilated. Circumcision is just like dermal punches, breast implants, or other major body modification and should be restricted to adults, period. There is no legitimate medical reason for circumcision and doctors (and others, like mohels) who perform the procedure on children should be punished.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:18 PM
1

At 6 or 7 that's normal. And you can easily treat this without removing the foreskin.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:14 PM
1

Non-religious people don't get to gouge out their children's eyes either. I'm saying that (in the USA) people cannot use the 1st amendment freedom of religion as an excuse to abuse children.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:53 PM
1

It's not as debilitating no, but it's similar form of mutilation. Removing fingers isn't as "serious" as removing eyes or entire hands, but it's still mutilation. This is an issue largely for criminal sentencing, the "eye gouger" should probably receive more jail time than the finger remover or mohel.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:13 PM
3

The primary argument of the anti-circumcision movement is that is wrong to mutilate children. If an adult wants to do something stupid to himself like cut off his finger or drill a hole in their head, it is still really stupid, but they have a right to do it. You do not have the right to cut the fingers off your child or drill holes in their heads. Cutting off the tip of the penis is no different from cutting off fingers. Sexual stimulation is beside the point. It's like saying that the reason y…
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:59 PM
2

I've noticed that pretty much all the pro circumcision arguments posted here degenerate to: "Hey brah, womenz aren't complainings about my all powerful penis! I'm a super-stud!" You're not a "men's right's advocate". You're a douchebag.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:16 PM
2

It's a "religious human sacrifice" thing that has NOTHING to do with medicine and hygiene, those are red herrings promoted by circumcision advocates (that all have a religious motive).
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:13 PM
1

The vast majority of women in Africa that are the victims of FGM do not complain. In many places, it is the women who preform and really "drive" FGM culturally. So what? It's still evil.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:11 PM
2

People who cut the clitoris off little girls don't "do it for fun" either. It doesn't matter why you think circumcision is a good idea, just like it doesn't matter why you're cutting off the clitoris or gouging out a child's eye. Mutilation is mutilation and it should be a crime punishable by a long prison term. The job of mohel should be banned and anyone, especially doctors, found practicing infant circumcision should be imprisoned, the same as people who gouge out children's eyes.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:09 PM
2

Circumcision has no medical benefits. That's a myth promoted by circumcision advocates (usually, in the US, Jewish doctors) who promote faked studies. Nations not influenced by the circumcision advocates, like all of Europe, Russia, East Asia, etc. completely deny the medical validity of this practice. Circumcision does not prevent AIDS or reduce the risk one iota, this idea is promoted by religious zealots that are opposed to condoms. Parents should not have the "freedom" to mutilate their kids…
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:05 PM
1

The opinion that it's okay to mutilate children for no reason at all is not consistent with humanism. If you want to mutilate children you're going to have to come up with a legitimate reason. Human sacrifice, and that's what circumcision is, is not consistent with humanism.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:00 PM
2

What are the limits on religious abuse of children? Do parents get to gouge out the eyes of children for religious reasons? If not, why not?
/r/MensRights13/05/11 06:56 PM
2

It does "stand on it's own". It's mutilating children for NO REASON AT ALL. Why shouldn't parents be allowed to cut off their children's earlobes? Or one of their fingers? Or gouge out one eye? How about foot binding and neck stretching? These things are the exact same as circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 06:50 PM
4

The "minor health benefits" do not exist. This is an after the fact rationalization. You will find that, without exception, such "studies" are run by pro-circumcision doctors and groups, often Jewish and Muslim doctors. The quack medical reasons of the past (making masturbation harder because masturbation causes illness) are based on religious ideas . The ONLY reason for circumcision is the religious commandments on Jews and Muslims. All the medical reasons are false.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 06:47 PM
1

Out of curiosity, what was the "valid health reason"?
/r/MensRights13/05/11 06:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter