~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Nothing weird hereHey, just passing through. Wanted to let you know that this is one of the biggest cop out responses I have ever seen on reddit. Congrats. | /r/PussyPass | 21/12/19 07:43 AM |
| 1 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meNo, one doesn't "have" to be "chosen over the other" in such a conflict. This is a special pleading argument. No it is not special pleading. Biological abortion is different than "financial abortion" not because I say so + hand waiving, but because they are demonstrably different concepts which I have attempted to demonstrate and you did not refute. Rather you rephrase my argument into what you want me to be saying so you can use your default script to defeat it. The only way for you to be consi… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 02:24 PM |
| -1 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meWrong Google it? If you are acknowledged as the biological father and have acted responsibly towards the woman when she was pregnant, you will have a strong legal case to block an adoption. Form a logical argument and you will get an actual rebuttal. If the statement is not logical you should be able to point out which fallacies have been used instead of resorting to one of your own. Hardly convincing. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 01:56 PM |
| 0 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meI'm making what argument now? Custody court favoring women by default is an injustice that I'm very much opposed to. It's also a completely different subject than what is being discussed here. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 01:44 PM |
| 1 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meYou are 100% wrong. Safe haven laws allow for the legal abandonment of a child. The child can be given up for adoption as well. If the father is legally known, he also needs to sign off on abandonment and adoption. If the father retains custody, he can sue for support the same as the woman. The woman has no rights that a man does not here. You are an idiot. Convincing refutation of the argument. Ad hominem prevails | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 08:39 AM |
| 0 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meNo, we don't. It's a woman body and 100% her choice under the law where abortion is legal and a man has no say in this. I'll assume you did not see my edit, but yes I did misspeak. Obviously. The child deserves the income from mother and father always, clump of cells or 15 year old teenager. HOWEVER the mother also has a right to not be a host of what amounts to a physical parasite. Sometimes when rights conflict, one has to be chosen over the other. This is only a special allowance for a woman … | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 08:17 AM |
| -1 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meIf a woman gives birth to the child and the state recognizes both the father and mother of the child as such, then she does NOT have the right to chose not to be a parent to the child. The exception being both the mother and the father chose to simultaneously give up the rights to being a parent and pass responsibility to the state or another party. She only has the right to not allow it to physically feed on her. This is an important distinction that can be treated differently than financial su… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 07:17 AM |
| -6 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meSorry, I mispoke. A man has the right to dissallow an embryo to use his body to develop into a child. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 06:48 AM |
| -4 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meA woman is not entitled to the income, but the child is. If the woman allows the embryo to develop into a child, it is the legal responsibility of the biological parents to provide for the child, it's as simple as that. We do have equal rights. Mother and Father both are responsible for the child. Men also have the right to disallow an embryo from developing into a child. Edit Apologies. My point being that men and women have parallel rights to not let an embryo use the parent's body directly to… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 06:06 AM |
| -9 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meA horrible idea really. It's basically an attempt to coerce an abortion Men could opt out and incur the same benefit of having a biological offspring with no investment other than having sex. This is a hugely abusable situation that trumps any injustice of a financial penalty for living with the exact outcome sex is existing for. Yes it is a double standard but it has to be. I'm pro choice, but we all have to live with the fact that having sex means that there has to be an acceptance and expecta… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 04:50 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter