TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ruMenDugKenningthreW Archive

View 2 posts and 118 comments by ruMenDugKenningthreW on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Two sides of the same core cognitive bias
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/23 07:32 AM
1

Which is funny to think. Seems you came around a couple years after some now ex-friends tried to sell me on reddit as a place not just for shitposting but also intellectuals, professionals, and experts to get information and communicate. I was on tumblr at that time, and while I eventually saw the error of my ways there, it's become clear this place is really just a worse version without the gifs.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:59 AM
51

Beat me to it. It's sad that, even in psych, I often have to explain what that is before the customary and deeeeeeefinitely not ironic eyeroll. Reminding people about the halo and horns effects just bounces off them too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/23 04:53 AM
3

Lol similar happened to me except evidently I was wrong for informing an "anti-fascist" that calling themself such a thing while advocating fascist control and treatment of "the bad people" still makes them fascist. Just wait until you have half a dozen vegans cyberstalk your profile, find out you \GASP\ have commented here, and then reddit defends them harassing you.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:47 AM
1

Since I'm banned, I can't see it anymore, but many subs list the individual mods on the right somewhere (at least if you're not using classic reddit) unless the mods are cowards and have the list set to hidden. For that sub, it also lists credentials for almost all of the mods, and while I can't recall each individual, but I think clinical psych PhD was a common one.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:36 AM
1

I hear ya. I gave up on psych a while ago (long, painful story), but I still go where I think my skill are needed - irony being that most of those subs have been the exact level or more abusive and toxic than what's claimed of this one. r/relationship_advice has been one of the woooooorst, especially related to most things related to men/from the male's perspective. I've tried explaining the contradiction in supposed humanistic contexts before, even to people claiming to be in psych, but it alwa…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:36 AM
1

Because it's essentially a worse version of tumblr that incentivizes echo chamber formation through censorship mods that aren't expected to exercise higher order reasoning. It's a big naughty to inform an idiot that they're an idiot here. You don't even have to use naughty words to be cast out. Just citing sources with a "trying being less ignorant," and out ya go, because when people harass you, it's fine. When you respond, oh boy......
/r/MensRights04/05/23 08:32 PM
30

Not the first time I've had to sidestep a ban over mod dipshittery like defending myself against harassment. However, I did play with fire the one time I responded to a mod by calling them out for being stupid. But it was that juicy, hubristic "look at this asshole thinking he's so smart" kind of stupidity, so what was I supposed to do? Not point out the ironic and hilariously obvious despite the ratio of equally stupid people? Makes me wish I'd known not to delete my old account since it seems …
/r/MensRights04/05/23 08:03 PM
144

And yet no one cares, even professionally. I was literally just banned from r/psychology for talking about my experiences and mistreatment in the field - on this article of all things. Only fitting that I also posted about peoples' lack of self-awareness in that same thread. Oh well - tubthumping again is just a few clicks and an email away.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 06:45 PM
22

Always found this strange. I've thought a lot about the differences between common male reactions to this vs common female reactions to the equivalent, and, while it's always a cultural thing at its core, I always come back to the idea that males typically experience their, for lack of a better term, sexual awakening earlier, more readily/obviously, and while it's the butt of a lot of sock jokes, it's accepted more readily than basically anything to do with early female sexuality. After all, mos…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 05:55 AM
44

At the risk of sounding condescending, you're really getting into your own head about this, hyperfocusing, and over-analyzing. Especially now that I've read the other thread, it's clear that all isn't helping you. Communicate this to your therapist and together better define what you want out of therapy. Even if he's trying to guide you toward something, that doesn't imply he's trying to slather his personal views onto you. It'd be very wise not to jump to conclusions and to roll with it. If you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/23 05:36 AM
8

Your name a reference to the movie? If so, nice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/23 10:26 PM
7

Completely forgot about this. Places like Australia have taken it to such an extreme that "child-like bodies" (i.e. petite women) are all illegal to show in pictures irrespective of the person's actual age unless it's clear they're like 80. Sorry, people. That you associate such bodies with children is a you problem, one best handled by a professional.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 10:00 PM
1

That's because women exist to civilize men per essentialist doctrine, meaning they're incapable of acting childishly - that's the sole plight of us ruckus brutes.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 09:50 PM
55

Not going to hold my breath since I've tested this in the past and had it kicked back from reddit as not violating their policies. "Incel" and other epithets are still run of the mill, not to mention the number of subs that are allowed to ban people because they post here or in similar forums. Evidently we're all far right operatives because feelings and emotions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/23 09:37 PM
1

Gotcha. Reddit has been in full swing lately, so I wanted to be sure, especially before I became a parody of myself. Good to know not everyone here is trying to play king of the hill on a bell curve.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/23 09:10 PM
7

Well, to be fair, it's more of a cult. Most of its tenets and claims require faith rather than data, and any failure of members, as I've experienced, to adhere to group norms risks excommunication and worse for offenses equaling fraud, blasphemy, and/or treachery.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:49 AM
15

Almost like patriarchy and matriarchy are two sides of the same coin, and the goal should be less trying to balance it and more spending it on something nice for the both of us. ​ Then again, if that coin metaphor is true, that means current claims, goals, and tactics of common feminists don't make them the good guys, and that just won't do. Clearly all this is sexist, and we're all alt-right fascists, you mansplaining fucks /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/23 03:44 AM
1

Personifying those I'm talking about or was that an attempt at me?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/23 03:29 AM
4

I agree, but it's a hard one to sell 7-12 on these days though. All or at least virtually all philosophy/logic courses are so dry, it's hard for anyone to get through, and I have a hard time thinking you'd find many high schoolers actually able to engage with the material. Plus debate clubs wouldn't fly these days like they'd have to per proper debate context. Maybe if we ever get done with the current "feelings over facts" mentality.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:27 PM
5

Part of the issue is because people fundametally stopped understanding how comparisons work. While they clearly have motive to intentionally misinterpret your words, it's also part of how they "control the narrative." It's perceived as equating one thing with another, therefor is a bad, and a very bad at that. If you're ever dealing with people too simple to understand comparisons look for similarities and acknowledges differences too, your best move is to move on. Don't be an idiot like me and …
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:11 PM
36

Feminists or most redditors?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:05 PM
2

In like 5% of cases. For the rest of us, it's a toxic lack of therapeutic competence and persistent messaging that we're worthless and abusive just for existing
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:50 PM
2

As someone with experience on both sides of the couch, I don't know where to begin. Can't call it "the" main issue, but one extreme issue is the competency gap connected to basic availability. Finding a professional, not merely just a therapist, but any professional who isn't a piece of shit is far harder than it should be. Slight hyperbole aside, you run into issues many young boys experience with the overdiagnosis and thereby unnecessary medication of ADHD. As a result, we suffer. Take me for …
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:40 PM
1

I mean, it depicts women manipulating situations to their advantage, and women never do that because reasons and stuff. So......
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:07 PM
1

Almost like there's something to that whole "women tend to use relational and social violence rather than the physical violence men are more prone to engage in" thing from several of my undergrad courses
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:04 PM
-3

Why does this have downvo- oh. You mentioned better access to healthcare and right wingers no likey actually making America great.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:16 PM
5

You forgot the *mic drop
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:11 PM
39

Welcome to the empathy gap, a term that's almost extinct in contemporary psychology.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:09 PM
3

Man, do I have stories from my Tumblr days..... For instance, I once lost a close irl friend because I argued with an ace activist she followed who criticized psychology/sexology because she couldn't conceive that having written a book on a handful of cherry picked studies didn't automatically make her claims valid. Anyway, surprising you only got a temp ban. Probably a mistake on their part given what they said. This would be my 3rd ban for defending myself and positions typically against peopl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 11:56 AM
9

Tripled. One of the most damningly ironic things intersectionals have yet to reconcile since day one is their version of the dark triad, straight, white, MALE. If you have those signifiers, those are the ONLY signifiers you have, unless you have a readily visible disability, but even then you'll still be kept on the outside at best. Granted, sorry, there is no such thing as reverse sexism/racism. It's just sexism, it's just racism. That it's against a white guy doesn't make it not sexist or not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 11:24 AM
10

Yup. Same. I'll be making another account soon since stupid people, sorry, mods think bans actually work, but I was just banned from r/antiwork because evidently it's harassment to defend myself against sexist attacks and name calling while pointing out that attempting to force people to live to your standards and "wiping out conservatives" is as much fascist as the bullshit many right-wingers say. And reddit itself seems to have backed it since I've yet to hear anything. Man, this site is becom…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 11:09 AM
8

Well this clearly isn't going to be a massive failure. It'll either be trotted out for the press like it did something good if or sweep under the rug due to the results.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 05:08 AM
20

Welcome to the general discourse surrounding men's issues. You can try going to the same people they went to and explain your position, how you raised issues related to all journalist deaths, not just the 11% that are women, and were attacked in debate, and are now being attacked again. Really though, hard to say if it's worth the effort. Most people are so misandristic these days, they're also blind to their own misogynistic view of "woman=victim." The resulting prejudice means that you're not …
/r/MensRights04/04/23 04:36 AM
29

It's almost like removing intent as a critically relevant factor in social interaction was a bad thing. These days, people don't do things. Instead, a person acts, then a committee is formed to decipher the meaning of it, and once consensus is reached, they'll decide what you actually did/meant, and we'll have a new rule to live by so that only the "bad people" have to live squalidly and the "good people" won't have to hear words like "lady." I can only imagine how past generations would react t…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 09:30 PM
71

Sadly, that's the reality. I've worked around enough people like this, and it's hell not being sure what random word will be fascistically removed from you because \GASP\** Someone was offended.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 09:23 PM
7

Seriously. May has well as post an article from Jezebel
/r/MensRights03/04/23 05:24 AM
1

Tell them that if they're competent psychologists, they should be capable of recognizing confirmation bias and to seek professional help to address their prejudiced, automatic thoughts in relationship to men. And, as this behavior pulls their ethical convictions and ability to have effective interactions with men into question, you plan to file a complaint with the APA with a copy of the email. Then to explain what he actually pushed for after getting some sort of proof.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 01:19 AM
2

No. Not possible. It's been thoroughly proven that false accusations are rare. ​ Sorry, couldn't come up with something on the back end more hilarious to make an obvious joke more obviouserer. After typing, it was just sad.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 06:58 PM
2

What do you expect of an article that seems genuinely perplexed at the connection between "diminished libido" and "frequent porn use"? Also, bonus points to its author for failing to operationalize what "consuming porn regularly" means. Was this self report data that failed to consider one person who uses every day and one who uses once a week may both call that "regular" use? Did actual uses per week get included in the breakdown, after which the researchers arbitrarily, and probably excitedly …
/r/MensRights28/02/23 06:32 PM
1

It's been said age is the last frontier of real equality. Reminds me about the psychology of retail, it's always the nastiest who speak out the most. There's a negativity bias in reporting situations like this. There's a reason why you don't really hear all that many issues in respective reverse - when people are pissed, they're more likely to act out. It works out more often in reverse, and since you're always going to hear the most from the extremes, one side is over emphasized due to greater …
/r/MensRights08/02/23 04:27 PM
11

Or in sum, the "women are always the victim while men are always the perpetrator" nature of feminism known for, what, a literal century now?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:39 PM
7

Welcome to Tumblr, where it's all about inclusion and safe spaces..... I was a user around 2010, and if you think this shit is bad, you should've seen it when all this started and before "communities" started eating themselves alive from the inside. The misandry and calls for violence against any and all men made Neonazis look calm and rational.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 03:11 AM
2

You see, her feeling safe is more important than his eye sight and pain. Duh. On a related note, after several messages, I now have it on abundant authority that if a woman isn't comfortable with a male wet nurse, she's not sexist, and it's not the same as her being uncomfortable if the wet nurse was female but with brown skin. Because of reasons. ​ /s
/r/MensRights16/01/23 01:35 AM
22

Because, as men graduate at a lower rate, it helps to ensure those who make it out of college are more likely to be top quality. Or it's yet another facet of sexism we're not allowed to talk about. Hard to say which.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 01:58 AM
1

I hate to be a little whiny bitch Knock that shit off, man. No reason to self-invalidate.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 09:20 PM
10

Just remember, misandry doesn't exist, and the attacks on you for being male and expressing your experiences and frustrations are proof that distrust, hatred, contempt, and ingrained prejudice of men isn't real. Crap. I put the definition of misogyny in there and just changed "women" to "men." Boy. do I feel like a silly incel neckbeard that, despite how much society tells men we're too preoccupied with sex and female nudity, me not getting laid is also something to ridicule men about. Who cares…
/r/MensRights05/01/23 02:11 AM
4

The /s was obvious, but it's always wise to remember that it doesn't take a genius to run a keyboard. And this is Reddit.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 06:48 PM
4

Given Huffpost, I'm more shocked that they didn't specifically point solely at black women.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 06:27 PM
0

Considering I've been seeing the same posts about female teachers fucking their students, failed chance to do a "then so do you" to the rapist comment.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:03 AM
2

Yeah, psych is pretty bad at retesting things to see if current social contexts still demonstrate effects. But it doesn't take a 10 year long longitudinal study to understand what self-fulfilling prophecy, discouragement, negative self-image, etc. are. I'm too lazy to look up crap from my undergrad, so ignore if you're ignorant (not you or OP - people in general as lazy as me acting like their unwillingness is my fault). Anyway... This idea has been looked at from additional angles, and it's a l…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:48 AM
10

Don't you understand? You're not allowed to like what you like. You, as a man, have to live to someone else's standards, and not only is that not sexist, you're sexist for thinking otherwise. Because logic. And stuff. And things. And more stuff. Probably. Something, something, privilege.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:31 AM
3

"By that logic and given women now have the option to stay in the kitchen, everything that happens by leaving is brought on themselves." Shows the inherent contradiction/double standard, but still likely won't go over well on reddit. Ultimately, there's no convincing the ideologically religious anyway. Plus they HAAAAAAAAAAATE it when past elements of "womanhood" are mentioned. Could also reference the vacuum or "barefoot and pregnant" instead.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:26 AM
15

Considering FGM isn't legally mandated by any nation, what's your point? However, like MGM is required in Judaism, FGM is required only in Islamic populations in Southeast Asia that follow Shafi`i religious law.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:11 AM
1

I am really considering not looking at these communities. ​ I guess I felt more balanced when i just thought about the problems on my own and didn't help others or try to talk about the anti-male problems in the hope others would feel anything. So you're going to let the demands of stupid people dictate and limit your person? Harsh as that may come off, it's to the point. There's no shame in giving up or just stepping back though. If you've had enough, you've had enough, and the internet is no s…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:53 AM
4

i'm not pro-christian but on the whole they are a lot better community than atheists. atheists tend to be very hateful. If you say so. My experience has been the opposite. In reality, bigots are everywhere, and it's critical to understand the internet tends to be highly susceptible to selection and clustering effects, which applies to your main post too. Just as I'm likely to find shithead atheists on reddit, I could throw a rock and hit 100 hypocrites who happily defy (irrespective of what they…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:51 AM
0

Eh, 70% of the way there. Since those early days, we've continued to research every condition, run critical statistical analyses, examine neurobiology every which way technologically possible, conduct animal testing and modeling, and pepper things with probably a little too many surveys, but hey, hard to get someone's take on things without asking them questions. But at least the 5 factor model passes empirical muster. Anyway, kinda why the DSM is in its 5th revision rather than "a bunch of us g…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:39 AM
0

"You"? When have I or anyone in psych said autism is a mental disorder, especially when it's a range of neruodevelopmental disorders empirical, not political, psychological science has helped us to understand and continues to help by researching and providing interventions to people like yourself to help you cope, understand, and eventually engage with daily experiences others take for granted, like many aspects of social interaction? Regardless, autism is a shitty one since you guys get labeled…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:23 AM
-3

Jesus, been a long while since I've seen that much ignorance crammed into such a small paragraph. Yeah, it is still repeatedly deemed misogynistic because therapists "constantly gaslight" their female clients, and you should see how people react when research finds that women perpetuate sexism and abuses or suggests that we need to give more funding to men's programs. How dare we take attention and resources from women! And while not all criticisms have been garbage over the years, this has been…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:30 AM
-3

Good thing that has anything to do with psychological science, because then you'd have a point.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:55 AM
3

Psychology has long abandoned a pretense of being scientific, as it's been co-opted by political forces within, much like sociology. ​ When you rewrite the DSM protocols based on politics and not science, you're not being scientific. [citation needed]
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:28 AM
-5

Given how much psychology has and still is derided as inherently misogynistic, this was pretty funny to read.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:20 AM
3

Really sounds like you need to find a better therapist, but given the scarcity of qualified, let alone good, professionals, may have to put up with the bullshit. Could also put it back towards your therapist. Point out that by dismissing how you feel, he's not only failing to support you professionally, he's doing exactly to you what you're talking about. His response to your criticism, given you don't verbally attack him, will tell you all you need to know if you should continue with him or not…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:13 AM
10

Sorry, no. It's not the job of a therapist to gaslight their client about their own feelings.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:07 AM
4

And a Nobel winning doctor gave us the lobotomy used for decades. Is all medical biology suspect now? You conflate the behavior of individuals and a single practice with the field itself. Makes sense why you'd appeal to economics and history as more grounded. May as well say English departments are well-balanced centers of objective rigor. Science adjusts as models are invalidated by data, but that, sadly, doesn't imply independent organizations adjust accordingly or swiftly, especially when soc…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:03 AM
15

It's fine. I've told enough medical and psychological professionals who don't have a fucking clue either. Not a dig at you - they're the ones who should fucking know better and not dismiss. To be blunt, it is what it sounds like. The gist is that my mom brought me in for a medical issue, it was serious enough my pediatrician thought something more was going on, he had a child psychiatrist talk to me, and when I confirmed that "mommy and daddy fight sometimes," the goodly doctors took everything …
/r/MensRights20/07/22 09:36 AM
35

In the states at least, it's up to whoever the attending is as to whether they admit you or not. If it's similar over there, could just be you got a shitty one and your friend had someone who didn't suck at their job. On the other hand, I had something of the opposite experience a few months ago when I went in mainly for resources and knowing I needed to go back on meds. My training is in psych (in case people didn't know, no, we don't give a shit about our own) and while I specified I didn't wa…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 04:53 AM
2

Yep, pretty common cliche going back a long time aimed at the "father knows best" themes of generations longer dead. Just about every time I see people put forward "but what about men" on body positivity, it's a countdown to how long til someone points at depictions like King of Queens to invalidate male inclusion. Just run of the mill misandry.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:36 PM
1

Pff, nuh-uh. King of Queens was on the air almost 2 decades ago, and if internet logic has taught me anything, that invalidates all the billboards and smaller posters featuring obese women in underwear I've seen.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:49 PM
10

Poe's law though. If people don't catch the satire, it's may as well not be satire.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:40 PM
3

Good thing governmental agencies are infallible, because then you'd have a point. And if you'd like to provide how Roe v Wade is even close to relevant here, I'd love to hear it while I read off all the names of the male soldiers killed since the revolutionary war. Forcing people to give birth is terrible and may feel like your lower half has been blown off, but imagine it actually being blown off because men in suits demanded you die for them.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:49 PM
18

Right. Because reporting biases and selection effects have never generated skewed statistics resulting in flawed conclusions, especially considering authority bodies are never subject to such errors. So when's the last time you took a stats or research methods course? I recommend you review some of the basics.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:34 AM
6

Not so much insight as it is validation of what a lot of us have been saying for years. The trans angle just grants it a new dimension of legitimacy these issues shouldn't need, but zero-sum culture war gonna zero-sum culture war.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:18 AM
40

Good thing that page made any mention of report bias and under reported case estimates. Because if it didn't, boy, would you look like a fucking moron. I mean apologist. Nah, I mean both.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:04 AM
2

Feminists can only see men as oppressors and providers. And yet it's men that have a Madonna-whore complex. /s
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:07 AM
2

Poorly defined concepts used ironically, as is arguably fittingly done here as well, for self-serving purposes. Every time I see either side use "masculinity" or "femininity," it inevitably fails to understand what differentiates the two, what's mutually exclusive to define each uniquely, by assuming actions are automatically masculine or feminine based purely on the sex of the person acting rather than the function of the behavior. Most commonly, those who throw "toxic masculinity" at others ar…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 09:36 AM
1

We have a world of information at our fingertips these days; it's not as if it's difficult to research. Per usual for Reddit, take your own advice. Your objection about genes is trivial. While I may have no choice about the melanin levels in my skin, I still have a choice in how much I agree with the demographic title and thereby accusatory prejudices through which others attempt to define that ultimately meaningless oversimplification and my person. My choices are what make up my "maleness" and…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:52 AM
3

Welcome to the police. Unrelated to this type of abuse, but illustrating the uselessness of cops - Years ago and a stupid amount of legal bullshit later, I eventually got a case against me thrown out. Cliche on cliche, a buddy and I stopped for lunch while I helped deal with his recently deceased fathers property (long story of its own). While he got food, I drove his work truck 3 blocks over to pick up a tool from Ace. No big deal, until the brakes went out on the way back, and I slid into a 2-…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:49 PM
1

You forgot the "TL;DR I not only critically didn't understand what you wrote, I'm going to fall back into the same fallacious claims as OP, that all of feminism is a singular entity with zero variance, and I'll do so with the same self-serving cherry picking used to claim all straight white males are the same oppressive shitheads because of straight white male leaders from Biden to Trump to (insert literally any other white dude)." If you're against this type of wokeness (I assume), it's a good …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:05 PM
46

Your avatar has a pedo-stache
/r/MensRights17/07/22 04:43 AM
4

Considering a couple weeks ago, I reported a handful of people for harassing an OP on r/relationship_advice just to see what would happen and only now got a bunch of "this doesn't violate out policy" messages back.... evidently it's a completely reasonable thing to say /s Edit: One of the reports actually had a positive result! Granted, looks like it wasn't for slinging out an "incel," and may've been more related to my general casting out lines to get a read of what is TEH BAD according to Redd…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 04:41 AM
5

No "do you think" about it. Check out Martin Lawrence's notorious SNL monologue that got him banned and more or less ended his career (or at least I saw significantly less of him afterwards).
/r/MensRights17/07/22 03:57 AM
10

The chauvinist
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:33 AM
2

While not all his points are trash, specifically those about apologetics and ad hoc rationalizations, I was just about to comment to the same effect. Sad when someone who talks about logic fails to recognize their own strawman and catastrophization, specifically because I could take just about every mention of "feminist" and replace it with "MRA/MGTOW/manosphere," and it'd fit right in with a pathetic amount of feminist rhetoric/comments I've had rape my eyes. But Reddit gonna Reddit. Feminism h…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:14 AM
14

But be prepared for the usual "you're a guy, so you can take it" double standard. Plus it may be the case that you'll be met with automatic doubt due to expectations of retaliation on your part. The more unconnected you can appear to things, the more likely you are to succeed.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:16 AM
1

Do you only show someone to be a fool if you prove them wrong... Is that supposed to be a question or statement? Anyway, no. The person, as you've shown, is capable for proving it themselves.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:33 PM
1

Wish I could find it, but there was an article a few years ago that, according to a single study, claimed regular people and kids could pick out who was the worst offenders based purely on facial expression. Anyone that looked mean obviously was, ya know, since Ted Bundy looked like a prototypical Hells Angel. Wonder if they bothered to test for racial bias in that "test" or if that was removed because it "skewed" the results in a way that demonstrated the halo and horns effects.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:54 PM
1

Reminds me of two arguments recently, one still ongoing with a vegan in denial about their moral licensing - hurting cows=bad, exploiting farm workers, destruction of habitat for more farmland, animal deaths from mice, raccoons, and more for increased crop farming=ok. There's no hope of reasoning with ideologues, so just try to have fun when replying.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:47 PM
5

Nah, you see. "Female sexuality" is a singularly defined magical unicorn and not in any way comparable to those dirty, dirty, shallow boys. Women need mental and emotional stimulation, which is totally different to men because of reasons. They aren't affected by visuals in any capacity, and all those models, actors, annual "sexiest man alive" lists, and fireman calendars are actually just for, I dunno, the gays? And even then, it's not objectification because (insert mental gymnastics).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/22 10:12 PM
0

Ever heard that phrase that starts "better to remain silent and be thought a fool"?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:02 PM
8

Nah. Ya see, because fascism is classically associated with far right groups, it's physically, scientifically, and supercalifragilisticexpialidociously impossible for far left groups to act in the same capacity. It's true because someone said so on the internet, and moral licensing definitely doesn't play in here. ​ ​ /s if not obvious
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:25 AM
1

She says entertaining herself
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:12 AM
16

If you've been doing this for 15 years, it's amazing if you're implying nothing happened during metoo's peak popularity. I'm not the friendliest looking guy, and while I worked with kids, every time I smiled at my female clients, it was picked apart. By the time I got tired of shit and left, we had a new ballbusting woman come in as a social worker who'd routinely put down my boys for not "manning up."
/r/MensRights15/07/22 10:21 AM
2

Nah, you don't get it. Because of [insert mental gymnastics], that's why it's ok if there's no logical consistency, and people deserve to be beaten if they misspell "bigger." Really though, I wish I could live for another 200 years just to see if THE WORD THAT SHALL NOT BE NAMED is still given this same level of moronic power or if it goes the same way that "man" and "guy" have. It'd really interesting to see, as people realize it's literally just a word like any other regardless of "history" an…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:04 AM
2

Hey, didn't you know a white kid singing all the lyrics to a rap song in the 90s is, like, the worstest racisism there is, and they should die because literally nothing was affected by it?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:06 AM
1

No, but everything that doesn't abide by THE MESSAGE, as some call it, is deemed that ever so popular "problematic." What's even funnier is that these people are quick to call others fascist without seeing the obvious.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:00 AM
3

Yup. Been banned by a mod once who was making fun of people and ironically calling others "pseudo-intellectuals" for using "big words" on a philosophical post. Evidently "or you just read at a 6th grade reading level" is very hurtful when the reaction proves it's true.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:57 AM
0

The gym rat stereotype does not include intelligence. Ya don't say. Almost like that explains everything you've said. And I'm sure you picked up on my mirroring your stupidity. Gym rats are very clever people, and you sure got me good. ​ Those people are creeps. Mind your own business. Says the guy giving off strong Kaczynski vibes. People talk to other people when they're in the same place. Get over it.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:57 PM
0

Mind your own business. How about you take your own advice and fuck off? Especially given I've done nothing but mirror your own idiocy, which, surprise surprise, you failed to catch. And they say gym rats are clever people. People talk to other people when they're in the same place. Get over it.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:38 PM
8

Yup, pretty well-known phenomenon in psych that women seek and receive services FAAAAAAAAR more often than men despite prevalence of various conditions generally being nearly the same between sexes. Hard to see why. I mean, with all the stories I've heard from friends and family, not to mention past clients over how they've been treated by therapists hellbent on convincing them they're automatically the cause of all their own problems and to stop blaming others (especially women in their lives),…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:43 AM
4

It's the very definition of schadenfreude. The very concept of "male" is collapsed into a single imaginary falsehood based on whitewashing concepts like "male privilege," so when any man is "taken down a notch," irrespective of the personage of the individual or other factors that intersectionality is supposed to consider, it's sadistically and vindictively celebrated. And it's done so in the same way that some people celebrate executions based purely on "because criminal" in boldfaced denial of…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:00 AM
1

we all mind our own business? Nobody is entitled Why should the gym be sacred? How about you take your own advice and fuck off? I just hate getting talked up on the internet. Wait, you're not hitting on me, are you? Or we can do this thing called "coping" that doesn't involve becoming irrationally angry at people for the egregious infraction of merely attempting interaction with us because we feel the entitlement we ironically accuse others of feeling. It's fine to want to be left alone, but tha…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:52 PM
3

Wait. You mean urination isn't a spectator sport? Then why do they call it "water sports"?
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:51 PM
6

Exactly. Fuglies need to know their place and never talk to others unless spoken to first. /s
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:48 PM
8

It's a bizarre mixed message. One half is that everything in the world caters to us and our desires without limit, and on the other, we're to remain controlled, reserved, polished, and stoic at all times or we're not men and potentially something worse. And then come the "why don't you ever talk about your feelings." Just browse r/relationship_advice, and it should be obvious why.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:36 AM
8

Until you realize their view of pornography and how that inherently intersects with masturbation even if using mental imagery.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/22 03:43 AM
1

They are pretty much equivalent, but it’s up for debate Ok. Thanks for saying and contributing nothing. But if you'd like to do something of value and given this push for equal representation is about the bias towards only high paying, low risk jobs to benefit only women, how is a gap in pay that may or may not exist depending on how you examine the concept equal to verified loss of human life disproportionately among men given the fervor over the former and scant, and often derided, mention of …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:15 AM
5

A woman my dad saw while my parents were separated stalked my family for over 25 years. Full on slow drive-bys when I was a kid and psychotic notes left on our front door. On my side, I had to set my facebook profile to private because of a young female client I had at an RT facility I worked. She'd decided we were in a relationship because I didn't treat her like shit and I "came to see her everyday." After my contact was cut and we shipped her to one of our sister locations about 6 hours away,…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:22 AM
10

Seems you missed the point. It's faaaaar more socially acceptable to call someone a dick than a cunt, in the US at least. Australia and the UK aren't so fragile.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:35 PM
6

I don't mean to be a dick But do you really expect logical consistency and refraining from moral licensing from really anyone, let alone the average Redditor? Ultimately, this will die off like children saying "fire" and "ratchet."
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:27 PM
15

I mean, a valid argument would've been cool, but saying what I already outlined with accompanied false equivalence works too.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:58 AM
1

Differs from culture to culture, but globally, girls are intentionally killed by parents more pretty much solely due to China. However, getting numbers from the CCP to contrast during and post One-child policy probably isn't going to reveal trustworthy data. But limited demographic data shows an unusual spike in the male population that doesn't jive with normal models, and it's believed to be due to males having a greater earning potential.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 04:07 AM
1

Feels like MLK had something to say about moderates
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:34 AM
49

Remember, when you're in school, bullying is bad. When you're in the real world, it's entertainment.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:38 AM
65

Forgot the part where it's ok men die in FAR greater numbers on the job "cuz men are dumb and take unnecessary risks"
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:59 AM
1

Caught it on Netflix like the year before the rise of the now potentially dying plague of wokeists.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 09:11 PM
1

"Not really" *details exactly how it is
/r/MensRights10/07/22 09:02 PM
5

TL;DR: Been there, experienced that. Psychology and social services as a whole are dead fields for men. Well, straight men, and I just can't fathom why. Nope. Not even a little bit. Not at all. Anyway, story time and cautionary tale for any considering carefields. Years ago, I had a highly destructive young female client who trusted all of 2 staff at my facility - her main community staff and me on the therapeutic side. I was the "group facilitator," which is just industry speak for "does group …
/r/MensRights10/07/22 08:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter