TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ruffian45 Archive

View 4 posts and 45 comments by ruffian45 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Be more succint and I might read it.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:26 PM
3

Columbine Colorado is turning more and more into a constitution free victim zone. This is why you see shootings at schools, colleges, and other places it's assured no one can defend themselves. Quoted from BlakeYo.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:59 PM
1

Great article, and spot on. This really should be in its own comment.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:58 PM
1

Yes, yes it is. In this case the context would be crystal clear. I only use the term "gender" when the context isn't clear. Sex is referring to biological sex, while gender is referring to the feminist idea that people are really different on the inside and so a man who cuts off his penis and says he is a woman really IS a woman.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:51 PM
-12

This throwaway isn't an MRA, it's some feminist, probably one of the /r/LadyMRAs mods.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:49 PM
-2

Yes, he is. Especially since his testosterone is significantly lowered.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:44 PM
1

What? My significant other has the right to give away my organs? Fuck that shit.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:43 PM
-2

Is this throwaday doch_doch or Alanna? Liberals, always looking for excuses take away our constitutional gun rights, never daring to look at the reasons WHY rampage killers exist in the first place. Young white male college student goes on a rampage? There are only a few reasons why he would be frustrated. Lack of sex, anti-male discrimination, anti-white discrimination, and general disappointment with the modern world are among the top reasons. Think about that, and act accordingly.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:38 PM
-3

The correct term is "sexes", not "genders".
/r/MensRights22/07/12 12:23 AM
-13

Girlwriteswhat, like typhonblue and most female "MRAs", is only here to demand that men act as if women actually have agency. They don't. They never will. These androgynous female "MRAs" are here purely for selfish reasons - to be treated like men, even when they're nothing like us. The only female "MRAs" I have any respect for are the traditionalist ones like Hestia and Laura Grace Robins who recognize women's place, who don't pretend that women can be as men, and who actually know what feminin…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:07 PM
-6

Women, blacks, Jews, liberals, Obama. And I'm only talking about who you're not allowed to criticize in the r/MensRights sub-reddit, unless you want to be summarily banned by the hardcore liberal moderators.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:59 PM
2

I think I realized now why you're confused. Either you only read the title of this Reddit post or you only skimmed the article and focused on the ONE paragraph discussing a case where corporations directly paid judges. The majority of the problem is that the laws that the GOVERNMENT creates put far too many innocent people in prison. Without large, powerful government, this would not be possible at all. Always with big government, corruption follows. Government "regulation" is also often just an…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:38 AM
3

His cognitive dissonance is astounding, isn't it? And his projection as well. He tells me I'm the one spinning things? Ridiculous. The power to incarcerate men comes from big government. The laws are created by government. There is no question of it. He refers only to one paragraph where a corporation paid judges directly, ignoring the rest of the article and the vast majority of the problem, which is big government. Perhaps he needs to read the article before commenting, and realize that the pr…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:26 AM
3

Corruption is not fought against by regulation, regulation is used by government to give certain corporations advantages over others, in other words regulation tends toward corruption. All this would be solved through limited government, and none of it would be possible without big government. But since you seem to be intent on putting the blame entirely on the free market, which no longer exists, as big government's corrupt regulations have eliminated the free market, it's clear you don't wish …
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:25 AM
2

The power lies in the hands of the government, not the corporations. Corporations do not have the power to incarcerate people or create the laws that send them to prison. The government does. This is something even a 5 year old could understand.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:21 AM
2

Towards the end of the interview, I took the first step in my experiment and informed the two ladies interviewing me that I did not wish to volunteer as a big brother for a little who has a Father here in the metro area who is being forcefully kept away from his son. I explained that I felt like it was not my place to take a boy to the park, or to the basketball court if the child had a father here in town who was willing to do the same thing, but was not allowed to because some Judge claims it …
/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:00 PM
0

I really wish women who claim to want to be responsible for their own actions and not to blame everything on males weren't all such blatant hypocrites.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:14 PM
6

It is the marriage of government and corporations, which can only happen with big government. It has nothing to do with a free market but with government meddling and government corruption. And I'm not the one who's biased. You are not making much sense. The financial incentives come from big government, not from the free market, thus proving my point.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:08 PM
5

There are definitely some draw backs to using financial incentives to perform public services. public services public
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:31 PM
0

You are blaming the victim now.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:11 PM
7

Some? Big government always leads to corruption and is the cause of most serious men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:10 PM
1

women who take responsibility for thier choices Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:39 PM
2

But it's not FAIR for women to have responsibilities like real adults!!!!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:31 PM
3

Yeah, she kept talking about how he is a master manipulator. The 14 year old kid. Yeah.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:30 PM
1

Um, no, it has nothing to do with his race.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:28 PM
-2

Why did we give women the vote again? So they could worry about non-issues and vote to transfer wealth from men to women, I guess. Women, the selfish, gullible, and short-sighted sex.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:25 PM
1

Nothing is free.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:23 PM
-2

The story does not change the fact that merely stating verbally "no" or providing token resistance does not a sexual assault make. It is a person's responsibility to make it clear. I would also say that, no, it isn't clear that you were sexually assaulted. It is clear that the boys were interested in some sort of sex act, and it is also clear that you did not effectively demonstrate your lack of consent. As I said before, men cannot read minds. Your parents should have taught you to actually res…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:13 PM
-2

Actually, no, just saying the words doesn't make it sexual assault. Women are well-known for putting up feigned reluctance to save face. And men are expected to make the first move. You are demanding that men read minds, you are stating that no man can engage in a sexual act without first asking permission. If a woman does not wish to engage in sexual acts, she must make it perfectly clear. That means yelling, screaming, kicking, fighting if she really doesn't want to engage in the sexual act. T…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:45 PM
3

Wow, once again you show a complete lack of empathy on the guy's part. You seem to only care about how you feel. That's how all women behave, or haven't you noticed yet? Even their voting record proves they care only about themselves.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:19 AM
1

Silly idea. This isn't about what women want you to do for them, it's about what you know is right. Either stand on your principles or shame yourself for a miniscule chance of getting vagina from some slag. And as I said before, do not ASK her, tell her she'll pay her own way. She will not respect you if you ask her, but if you tell her and she isn't a bitch, she'll be glad to pay. And if she has a problem with it, tell her to find a new date.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:18 AM
0

Certainly, especially in the eyes of a woman, who sees it as weakness.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:16 AM
-2

I'm sure you realize that the mere act of verbally asking them to stop and their continuing does not render it an assault.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:15 AM
2

It's wrong to ASK. It's correct to TELL her that she's paying for it herself. Do not beg.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:51 AM
-2

Manhood is about being masculine, which is the most satisfying thing for a male to be. Read anything by Jack Donovan, such as The Way of Men: http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2012/03/the-way-of-men-interviews-and-reviews-week-1/ Oh, and ignore the egalitarian fools who tell you manhood is "having a penis" or that women can do these things too. It's utter rubbish. There's a reason traditional societies have rites of passage for boys.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:42 AM
0

Feminists didn't lose their way, they always hated men.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:49 AM
3

I'm sorry Marxists for being white and male!
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:31 AM
1

I would agree to a point. It's his right to behave as he likes, and it's my right to point out how his behavior negatively impacts society.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 02:50 AM
2

And yes, I'd say the same if we had ultra-liberals coming in here spamming up threads with their anti-Right crap. We do. ignatiusloyola and Gareth321 themselves are guilty of doing so. Nothing is done about it, obviously.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 02:50 AM
1

Tell it to the moderators.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 12:47 AM
2

When are they gonna ban you?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:42 PM
6

You're being divisive. If you have an argument against the CONTENT OF THE ARTICLE, make it, or shut up.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:42 PM
2

More on the specific case mentioned: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawana_Brawley_rape_allegations And an article on the topic from the False Rape Society: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/07/msnbc-adds-tawana-brawley-advocate-al.html
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:24 AM
4

It is natural for humans to seek security, to want comfort and plenty, to crave pleasure. But is that all? I don’t think it is. I think that is the easiest and safest thing that elites can provide. Without struggle and strife and identity, our lives lack narrative and meaning. Narrative and meaning are also important, especially to men. Ask men why they volunteer to join the military or gangs, or why they take on a task that’s harder than it has to be. Men want the story of their lives to be wor…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:07 PM
2

Heh, that would be accurate too. Abstract: This research utilises a content analysis methodology to examine the issue of male rape among prison populations within the United States. The physical and psychological aspects of rape are described by professionals, victims, and aggressors. The inmate terminology related to prison rape such as Punk and J ocker are defined to show the social structure of the prison sexual subculture. Previous theories of prison rape concerning racism, power, and sexual…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 07:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter