TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

runealex007 Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by runealex007 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You don’t need affirmative action for op-ed my dude. You just publish whatever, and as someone pointed out this is even only in their online edition. I’m willing to believe they discriminate but I still believe in the neutral standing of the op-ed sections.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:52 AM
10

A good publication will publish any well written piece of work, I’m not familiar with any other Op-Ed’s they have published but this isn’t journalism. Opinion section is completely unrelated from that.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:54 PM
1

Yes, because that's the kind of aspirations people have when they make accusations of rape. c'mon.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:16 PM
3

you don't even know mattress girl's name. That's the point. This shit goes no where for people. They really gain nothing. False rape accusations are a thing, but some people in this sub seem to dangerously think all accusations are fake instead of really thinking about the context.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 06:58 PM
0

Do you know her name? Have you seen her face? She really does gain nothing.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 03:43 PM
5

Okay, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. This is taken completely out of context. This is in regards to the Dustin Hoffman thing, right? As far as I can tell from the video, he specially means the person accusing Hoffman is gaining nothing from accusing him. This was not a general statement on rape accusations. this was a case by case statement, which is what this sub stands for, no?
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:00 AM
22

Okay, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. This is taken completely out of context. This is in regards to the Dustin Hoffman thing, right? As far as I can tell from the video, he specially means the person accusing Hoffman is gaining nothing from accusing him. Putting their own little context in the brackets is fucking disgusting. This was not a general statement on rape accusations. this was a case by case statement, which is what this sub stands for, no?
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:00 AM
2

Sure, but i think it just completely ruined the credibility of the whole concept. It's Stannis! Okay, maybe it's Jon... OKAY FINE ITS DANY. How about you just lie alone you miserable old fire witch
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:02 PM
23

Oh tbh I didn't even notice it. I like all those character except the dorne dumbass. I only realized they actually did that on purpose (or not, but) when it was pointed out but D&D in the behind the scenes. At first my reaction was "oh cmon" then I was like wait, I didn't notice which means it didn't feel forced so it's fine.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 01:40 PM
58

If you're talking about Lord/Lady* Lyanna Mormont you better choose your next words carefully because she's fucking awesome and I would kneel any day for her. That said, the show has some random ass moments that are forced and not written well when it comes to this. "Oh, the prince that was promised is actually a completely gender neutral term; please ignore that every word in this scene sounds like last minute bs" And some others that I can think of right now. I started to feel like Emelia Clar…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 01:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter