TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

runhomequick Archive

View 0 posts and 132 comments by runhomequick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

I am a mod of /r/xychromosomes, set up for that very purpose. Feel free to post content there.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:27 AM
2

Now I'm removing it, since linking to them isn't something we do around here.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:11 AM
14

I'm sure my grandfather in law felt highly honored when he got shipped to Vietnam at the ripe old age of 18. There were all sorts of people over there just waiting to give him metals, especially in the form of high velocity lead.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:06 AM
2

I'm not an MRA because I hate some woman (or groups of women). I'm insulted that you think the MRA movement is a reaction to personal grudges.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:55 PM
9

Murder doesn't rely on consent.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:28 PM
3

Freedom has similar issues. Freedom to a libertarian and Freedom to a communist mean very different things.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:15 PM
7

Unfalsifiable.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:58 PM
2

Ignore him. He makes widely generalizing posts all the time disparaging women, all with his trademark terrible spelling and grammar, usually downvoted.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 03:53 PM
2

He's a fairly strong libertarian, isn't he?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:07 PM
4

I think the poster above was asking what reproductive rights do men even have to threaten.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:01 PM
3

I think that sentence is trying to say that women perpetrated violence more often and that in violence perpetrated by both sexes that reciprocal violence was more likely to result in injury.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:35 PM
2

One of my friends bragged about something like that. Upon closer examination, he had liability only and was comparing to full coverage.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:01 PM
1

Primary aggressor isn't about who struck first or even if they participated, it's about who has the greatest potential to hurt the other.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:21 PM
0

Generally student loan debt isn't considered community debt (except in a few situations where the couple had the benefit of the degree it paid for during a significant period of time).
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:03 PM
10

Put politicians on the list.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:20 PM
1

It's about precedent and principle. Either laws are applied equally to businesses, or they are not. Otherwise you get creeping acceptance of this in larger and larger ways. The hypocrisy of health insurance not being able to charge higher premiums to women by law, but auto insurance being able to charge higher premiums to young men is another example.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:03 PM
3

That's some hardcore No True Scotsmen stuff. Do you consider the suffragettes to have been feminists? They were also responsible for the White Feather campaigns to shame men into serving in the military even if they missed the draft or were sent home. Do you consider the group NOW to be feminists? They were some of the biggest supporters of the VAWA, which contains primary aggressor policies. From what I have seen, academic feminism is where the "Power + Prejudice" thing came from, as well as Pa…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:00 PM
3

Who are we supposed to believe are the "true" feminists? The ones online, the ones we know, or the ones that actually get legislation passed? If we go by the ones online, in feminist spaces you see all sorts of anti-male generalizations. The ones I know in person still subscribe to the whole "power + prejudice" thing which allows them to handwave away any idea or action that is against men because of "patriarchy". The ones writing legislation include things like Primary Aggressor guidelines that…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:06 PM
2

As long as it contains primary aggressor guidelines, the VAWA is against men simply due to the average size of men compared to women.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:55 PM
2

The funniest part of that is that the people with dissenting views are often the most heavily downvoted, leading me to believe that the disabled downvotes aren't really having much effect on the members of the community.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:52 PM
2

The same way it affects public businesses (but not private clubs).
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:10 PM
0

This is a direct example of unequal application of laws.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:08 PM
1

Public businesses aren't generally allowed legally to discriminate based on gender and race. Whether or not this should be illegal is a different matter.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:07 PM
3

In the service jobs I worked in, I never worked in a place where the guys and girls even did the same jobs (except for one place with a significant bias for positions, even though everyone worked all the positions). Interestingly enough, at the movie theater I worked in, it was a good example of an apex situation. A man was the general manager, but the majority of the managers were women, and a majority of the lowest workers were men. All projectionists were men (mostly because you had to be tal…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:02 PM
11

Marching for the right to vote is a whole lot easier to gather marchers for compared to marching for the right to get shot at whether you want to or not.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:23 PM
3

Even the cops have hard times hitting their targets. I'm not claiming that the average gun owner is a crack shot, but I will claim that the people I know that have concealed carry licences are better shots than the average cop and spend more time shooting than most cops. Cops still carry firearms because they value their lives. When cops stop carrying firearms, I will begin to consider that it might not be so worthwhile, but until then I remain convinced that citizens with concealed carry don't …
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:21 PM
2

In the Aurora thing, I really doubt that an armed audience would have made it worse, but that's arguing hypotheticals, so I'll drop it. Castle Doctrine won't save those people from prosecution if they can't prove a threat.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:57 PM
1

There's a better explanation elsewhere, but basically, when they swapped gun types they had poorly trained cops that kept accidentally shooting when they didn't mean to (didn't keep finger off trigger). So they increased how hard it is to pull the trigger, which makes accuracy drop off quite a bit, especially after the first shot.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:53 PM
3

It's not a good idea, I just think the alternative is worse. The police have no requirement to help any individual citizen. Preventing citizens from having a legal method of defending themselves in addition to not providing them a guarantee of help if they need it would lead to some bad vigilantism or seeking extrajudicial justice (the mafia can perform this function). The guns in my home will likely never harm another living being. I do not have a concealed carry license or even own a handgun a…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:36 PM
8

It's not about living in constant fear. I don't have tools at my house to fix my car or my plumbing because I'm in fear of having a problem. I don't have a pantry full of food because I'm in fear of being hungry. I have useful things because if I need them I will have them accessible.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:16 PM
6

I have had him tagged as "good natured troll of aSRS and MR" for quite a while, and with quite a few upvotes.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:14 PM
1

Anything you have to go through a dealership to do will cost you an arm and a leg.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:41 PM
1

That's the price quoted to me last time I asked at the Toyota/Scion dealership.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:20 PM
2

The bulk of the cost wouldn't be in making me another key, it would be in rekeying all the places I had keys to and getting new keys made for everyone else. As soon as you get away from the kind of locksets you buy at the local hardware store and get into more secure ones for buildings it gets expensive. To just buy a replacement key for my car is around $250 from the dealership.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:59 PM
4

If someone stole my keys, I guarantee it would cost a thousand dollars or more to fix the problem. I have keys to my house, two other houses, a lockbox, my office, and my car on there. Not to mention that in the meantime, I would be screwed as far as getting home in my car or getting in my front door. That's ridiculous overkill for being late and wanting to split the bill, and here it is presented as something reasonable.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 02:28 PM
5

I'm no lawyer, but wouldn't that basically be a broken legal system? If they accepted this, that would put an acquittal out of reach of anyone without a videotape of them in another state flashing ID getting a blood sample drawn while being fingerprinted during the time in question.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:24 PM
2

Where does having a disability put you on the axis of oppression? Are people with disabilities lowest on the totem pole, since they can be oppressed by reality with or without human contact?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:04 PM
3

Then you need a card that gives your consent to sign a consent card.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:36 PM
3

You haven't missed out on much.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:54 PM
6

From what I understand, it's hard enough for a decent sized company to win in a legal battle against a former employee, much less to win the lawyer fees.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:20 PM
12

In some instances, going to court has already cost you enough that it wouldn't have made it worthwhile. That's why settlements are so common.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:53 PM
1

I thought I saw some on primates too and I seem to remember an analysis done on Okinawans that attributed some of their apparent longevity to a cultural custom of eating less. Good studies proving anything on humans are hard to find.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:06 AM
2

Any calorie restricted diet that doesn't leave you malnourished should lengthen your life.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:38 AM
3

Did you read the cracked article here about how Scooby Doo was set in a hugely dystopian future (at the time)? It was pretty interesting.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:24 PM
5

I thought the Mexriarchy was some kind of mega burrito nacho combo thing at Taco Bell.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:19 PM
7

Isn't the state the very embodiment of the role of the patriarch?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:03 PM
5

He said it was a feminist rally, not an exclusively female event. Don't assume the two terms are interchangeable.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 02:05 AM
2

If you decide to go down that road and want to ask questions, you can ask there or message me. I would be glad to help.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:52 PM
8

The only way the MRM can be to blame when feminists attack other feminists is if you assume feminists have no agency.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:45 PM
3

Okay. I am a big proponent of /r/keto, since I have lost about 55 lb since January on it even though I have been goofing off the last three months. Regardless of how you do it, good luck with your goals.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:31 AM
1

Got a general plan set up to lose weight?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:04 AM
2

Not in any area with anything you can pick up. I would not like the odds of fighting anyone in a bakery, around metal objects, knives, etc. Actually, I wouldn't like the odds of fighting anyone in any enclosed area with random objects laying around.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:16 PM
2

Most people would claim the patriarchy was stronger the further you go back. If you look back to the 1800s, prior to the Tender Years Doctrine pushed by Caroline Norton, a British feminist, default custody went to the father. After the Tender Years Doctrine, default custody went to the mother, then sometime after the 1950s, the standard went to "the best interests of the child" but not much has really changed. I don't think it's as simple as blaming the patriarchy for hurting men as far as child…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:33 PM
7

In an argument a few weeks ago on reddit, someone brought up how the default custody laws were part of patriarchy. When I brought up how the Tender Years Doctrine was a feminist creation, they still blamed it on the patriarchy saying that times were different then. I stopped participating in that discussion shortly after because people with be proved false cannot be reasoned with.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:05 PM
1

I'm not familiar with that controversy. Link/recap?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:33 PM
2

Eventually, you would have to be politically connected (or wealthy) enough to pay for the "free" reversal in any orderly time frame.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:00 PM
4

Do they have a reputation for good service and a competitive price? If so, I might use them.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:09 PM
2

I feel important. I wonder which comments I have made put me on that pastebin list.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 03:07 PM
8

Fighting what you perceive as sexism with what you know is sexism is a dangerous road to take.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:08 PM
6

I don't really care to lump people into groups and then manipulate them accordingly (which a lot of people support when it's the government doing it). Men may or may not be genetically predisposed as a group towards a certain career path, but that doesn't help individuals who don't meet that standard. Women as a group may or may not be good at something, but that doesn't matter to individuals. If you like math, science, and knowing how things work, great, study to be an engineer, regardless of g…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:55 PM
17

We had a seminar my first year in engineering that had mandatory attendance called "Cultural Competency". A women taught us over the span of an hour how white men are oppressors, whites are oppressors, and men are oppressors and how everyone else receives some amount of oppression from whites and men. Most of us found it to be ridiculous, especially the idea that being a bigot required power over others.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:26 PM
5

Almost every comment closed with an insult.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:43 PM
1

Can you explain further?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:28 PM
1

/r/xychromosomes could be that subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:33 PM
1

I hope you understand the irony of someone with your username telling people that you find a joke insulting.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:01 PM
10

The idea of too intoxicated to consent has walked its way back from "unconscious" to "blackout" to "any alcohol".
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:58 PM
9

So the true victims of circumcision, just like war, are women? Impressive logic.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:09 PM
1

If that is the standard for a hate group (they disagree with another ideology, their motives, or their methods), then most of reddit is a hate group.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:44 PM
11

Holding a grudge against someone that tried to ruin your life isn't childish at all.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:06 PM
3

That is a possible result, depending on whether they feel entitled to it or whether they appreciate it. Whenever people quit appreciating the nice things I do for them, I stop.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:14 PM
2

Some people only recognize behavior as hurtful if it impacts either them or someone else they identify with.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:04 PM
1

I don't think you can win that argument. When I have tried to have a serious discussion about feminism, even when I point out feminist actions that have had undesirable effects on either women or men they blame it on the influence of the patriarchy. You can't win an debate with someone who has unfalsifiable arguments.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:20 PM
15

Which is more likely?
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:52 PM
13

It's kind of hard to differentiate between the two in a meaningful way. Most equity feminists still support "feminist" organizations even if they aren't equity feminist organizations.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:50 PM
6

Wait, who was an opponent of lobotomies and sterilizations (which often targeted groups like native americans) that was for something worse, and what exactly is so much worse than lobotomizing people or preventing them from ever having children other than outright killing them?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:38 PM
9

Leaving the decisions on what is ethical and correct to just doctors and scientists (and politicians) worked out real well with lobotomies, sterilizations, and other medical horrors of the last century, didn't it?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:44 PM
3

I saw it.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:01 PM
3

Considering the research into in-group bias, I would have to say that men would most certainly not be ahead.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:45 PM
3

Under our current legal system, no. Under an ideal system of property rights (which likely never could exist), maybe. As long as everyone could freely associate with whoever they please (which necessarily means they could refuse to associate with whoever they please), that is one possible outcome.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:07 PM
16

Men only golf clubs are at least private property, doing this with anything funded with public monies is much worse.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:20 PM
13

That's not really a valid argument. Anal sex is a kind of sex, but I doubt you would claim he had consented to that as well.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:19 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights25/08/12 06:51 PM
-1

Bureaucrat power rests in denial of action. Cop power rests in action.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:52 PM
2

Did anyone else notice in myth 3 the comment about hitting their boyfriend if they make sexist jokes? Policing speech with even mock violence isn't anything I can condone.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:47 AM
2

Egalitarian.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:03 PM
1

You need to make time and find the money to deal with this now before it haunts you for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:55 PM
12

That's for criminal defense.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:35 PM
2

But then how can I get stuff that I want done when I can't get everyone to play along?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:13 PM
1

There is also /r/xychromosomes but it's rather small and isn't used too much.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:57 PM
2

So in cases of false rape accusations or cuckold child support, the real victims are still women? You claim that women taking advantage of gender bias are held in contempt by feminist for making it more difficult for legitimate cases to see justice. Do you realize how messed up that sounds, that the only reason it is wrong to perpetrate injustices on men is because it interferes with getting justice for women?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:31 PM
5

True equality is so dangerous for individuals though. The chance to fail and have to take consequences of your own choices can be terrifying.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:27 PM
-1

...and bookstores.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:33 PM
3

Throes.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 11:17 PM
4

So, a manipulative person could commit a crime, get caught, cut themselves, then get special consideration from you that they shouldn't be punished, or at least not so severely, for their crime?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:05 PM
1

Dewey Cox?
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:01 PM
1

Downvotes, downvotes everywhere.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 07:24 PM
1

How exactly does the auto-tagger work and where can I find more information on it?
/r/MensRights04/08/12 10:09 PM
1

Devotion/obsession.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:19 AM
1

Do you know how old the claim that the SCUM manifesto is meant as satire is? Was it contemporary apologia or later revisionism?
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:41 AM
1

If it got linked to another specific DVB and the voting total didn't change add much as expected, what would that mean?
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:28 AM
2

I can't speak definitively about the past or about any one else's experience, but I can't really think of the times that I've been made to feel like I was to be proud of any masculine trait other than how it benefits others. However, experiences may vary, and opinions of masculine traits (or solely masculine traits) and what comprises then may vastly vary.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:09 AM
6

Wouldn't the first type be more effectively discussed as traditional gender roles instead of labeling it patriarchy?
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:42 AM
1

I saw an accusation that he was a SRS false flag in an AMA thread here: http://www.reddit.com/r/AMA/comments/xh2vi/iama_reformed_srser_ama/
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:03 PM
9

Posting isn't zero sum. If you have a question or a response, go ahead and post it without fearing that it will drown out someone else's voice.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:10 PM
2

Actually, I think if I had a choice, I would rather be armed with a lead pipe against someone with a knife, assuming it was a decent length.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:22 PM
2

Encourage reading interesting books. I especially enjoyed classic books like the real version of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:49 AM
1

I thought it was one of the most interesting textbooks I had outside off my field of study.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:23 AM
3

I took a class called "Persuasion" as an upper level elective my last semester. It was neat as hell, although not what I expected. The focus was on the theory of persuasion and to examine your condition, instead of application as I assumed. Cialdini's book was one of our two textbooks.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:06 AM
5

The juveniles who committed the Jonesboro shooting, when released, were given new identities and had full civil rights (one of them even applied for a Concealed Carry License, which was denied due to lying about his previous residences). The other shooter was arrested a few years later in possession of a firearm and controlled substances. My point is, if a mass murderer gets a court appointed new identity because he was a juvenile, why should a sex offender who was charged and convicted as a juv…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:22 PM
1

Men Going Their Own Way.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:07 PM
3

No problem, I just would hate to see someone trying to be a nice person get burned.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 03:34 PM
8

Make sure he doesn't delete the picture or you save a copy. If not for his benefit, but for society's. I doubt this is the first time or the last time this person will turn to accusations to get something they want.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 12:32 PM
5

Wow. That's messed up in a serious way if true.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:47 PM
1

I find that hard to believe.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 03:33 PM
1

He would not have gotten the same treatment if he were young and anything other than white. If he were almost any other white male, he would not have gotten the same treatment.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:47 PM
4

True, but are they treated the same as others of the same sex and ethnicity? Would all white males get the same treatment Ted Kennedy did with the whole Chappaquiddick incident?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:28 PM
9

The wealthy or politically connected are basically their own sex and ethnicity.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:55 PM
36

I don't recall meeting a man who was stronger than a gun or a knife.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:15 AM
1

I'm just saying that basing family law on a genetic argument (you have a responsibility to those carrying your genes forward) can produce results vastly different than the current system we have.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 03:20 PM
5

It especially falls flat considering that if you find out the child isn't yours when they are a few years old and divorce over the infidelity, you will still be paying child support.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 03:10 PM
17

Trying to bring in the law (codified violence) against someone is a form of violence.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 04:27 AM
2

I'll believe that feminists are really egalitarians when they start throwing some force behind reform of the legal system towards equality.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:27 PM
2

Can you explain this further? The therapist was suprised and wanted to schedule a free exit session. (I knew what it was about and I disagree with the ethics of it). Did you think it was basically a trap to let her and your ex tell you that you were a bad person and blame you?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 10:23 PM
6

It might or might not be illegal where he is, but the point of it isn't to necessarily just keep his job but to keep him out of jail or out of a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:00 PM
5

You might invest in a cheap camera system for your office, although I'm not sure the legality of recording it without posting a notice.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:19 PM
25

That's the only way I can look at this and not be deeply depressed.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 05:08 PM
1

I have gotten out of several tickets, but they were all due to a clean record, being polite, and not committing anything worse than speeding 7 miles over the speed limit.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:28 PM
2

Seriously, if I were you I might look into a ketogenic diet (/r/keto). I'm narcoleptic and ketosis is a better medicine than any amount of Provigil or Ritalin they put me on. I finally have the excess energy to exercise, and that's on top of staying awake at work and being alert all day.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 03:38 AM
1

Probably still a problem, but I'm not sure. When I worked at a theater they flipped their lids one day when someone took a selfshot with a friend with their back to the screen and then refused to delete it. Of course, this was during a sneak preview almost a week before release, so YMMV.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:07 PM
1

Don't attempt that in a theater building, way too many powerful laws about copyrights that can get you in trouble real fast.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:33 PM
2

Veggies get a lot better with the addition of butter, heavy cream based sauces, cheese, or bacon grease.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:10 AM
2

You are a monster.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter