TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

runninginacyclone Archive

View 7 posts and 623 comments by runninginacyclone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Absolutely. But you gotta feel for the guys in HR taking it hard in the neck from every direction. Like maybe cut people some slack?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:07 PM
1

I think some are missing the wood for the trees here. The feminists blaming “a culture of sexism” are full of shit. But somebody has to have the kids and it’s not men. Now, who do we want to be having kids, hardworking intelligent women with science degrees or dumb girls interested only in having sone poor sap provide for her swelling brood of malnourished feral proto-criminals? I would say we need to offer men the same parental leave and benefits women get. And we need to move back to a situati…
/r/MensRights23/02/19 09:53 AM
5

“Cheshire Police was among a number of forces criticised in 2015 for having no black officers” Damned if they do and damned if they don’t.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 09:39 AM
1

Yes but don't get married, it's not good for men. The state regards you as her servant for life.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:01 AM
31

Well when the definition of 'sexual harassment' includes 'unwanted sexual attention' then I'm not surprised it's not 100% for either sex. And to be honest I feel sorry for those people who have never, ever received 'unwanted sexual attention'.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 10:57 AM
1

Yeah but so what. This calumny against 'priviledge' as if it's evil or something is ridiculous. People should relearn the fact that envy is BAD.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:58 AM
1

Correct. The Democratic party and the mainstream left in the US are as close to outright Total Dictatorship fans as anything Orwell wrote. They want to ban books, tear down statues, tell you how to think, what to think, what to wear, what to eat. It's fucking insane. It's not 'liberal' or 'progressive' or even left wing. They HATE the working class. They HATE the working man. They are fucking ingsoc in the making.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:54 AM
2

Well I'm firmly left wing - I'm more left wing than the Democratic party who are a joke and not left wing at ALL. And I'm very much against today's feminism which is mainly just an excuse for disgusting bigotry and female supremacism. So you're wrong. Ciao.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:50 AM
2

Just stop buying P&G goods. Theres a million reasons not to, men's rights is only one.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:48 AM
3

yeah he has no shot, but as he says himself - it will get these issues like automation into the conversation. Left to the mainstream candidates all they will talk about is guns, abortion, immigration and identity politics. Same old bullshit when there are real problems coming down the track that dwarf the wedge issue crap.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:23 AM
2

Yeah but that's the only wild thing he's proposing and his reasons for doing so are sound once you hear them. He's a lot more centre than Bernie who has several wild but far more nebulously defined policies. The next industrial revolution has already started and automation will kill jobs the same way that heavy machinery did in the 19th century. It's important to plan ahead so as to avoid riots, murderous revolutions and what have you. UBI will be a net job creator and a net benefit to the tax p…
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:21 AM
11

The left always tears itself apart. Fucking morons. They're as bad as the extreme right. But the moderate left are hiding under the bed, except for: Andrew Yang. Yang 2020.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:18 PM
1

wrong, She meant to say communist.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:16 PM
8

Yep it's "if men can't trust themselves around women then they should'nt... etc" ​ It never dawns on them that it's women they don't trust and for reasons that are current and political, not sexist and ancient.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 10:56 AM
1

50% of all my ancestors were women. So I guess I get 50% of whatever's going? 50% of every woman's ancestors were men. So I guess she gets 50% of the punishment? ​ These 'feminists' are idiots, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:38 PM
1

Might work if the respondent was of a historically marginalised ethnicity and was claiming some reparations from the opressor group. But women have both female and male ancestors, as do men. So the whole thing falls apart at the first hurdle. These random 'feminists' are mouthbreathers.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:33 PM
1

ALso your ancestors are both male and female. And women's ancestors are both male and female. It's an error of logic to suppose that every women inherits the setbacks of her female ancestors and not the privileges of her male ancestors and vice versa. ​ Thats on top of the fact that the idea that all women were oppressed and all men were oppressors is total bullshit. ​ ​
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:30 PM
3

Collective punishment of a population is against the Geneva conventions. ​ Article 33: Individual responsibility, collective penalties, pillage and reprisals. No protected person may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed. ... Under the 1949 Geneva Conventions, collective punishment is a war crime. ​ Ask your feminist why she wants to be a war criminal. ​ ​ Also my ancestors are both female and male. HER ancestors are both female and male. Why do I get punished for bei…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:27 PM
2

I think that's a quite ungenerous reading of it.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 10:03 AM
1

Sure. But I do see Incels as a nascent hotbed of violent radicalism.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:57 AM
5

Indeed. Identity politics will be the total undoing of the left.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:59 AM
6

Welcome aboard. The incels are a terrorism movement in the making. I can understand their rage. The same way I understand why young muslim men become radicalised. 'Social justice' needs to start including young men, young white men in particular and Feminists need to stop demonising men. Otherwise a huge proportion of otherwise normal, decent young men are going to become radicalised and very dangerous. And this helps no-one. The MGTOW boys are a different kettle of fish and it's sad that they a…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:21 AM
3

Men are not allowed to use the chairs. Wow sexist art. What's next - paintings that men cannot look at?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:18 PM
2

I've met 2 or 3 councellors. I found them to be pretty good in general. One guy was really good. Just like a male friend, with good advice.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:20 AM
2

If only it were possible to modernise the Girl Scouts programme. Oh well.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 01:03 PM
19

"relax, I'm just going to mutilate your sexual organs!'
/r/MensRights08/02/19 12:06 PM
2

I respectfully suggest you know very littkle about Islamic countries or their religion or the vast majority of that religion's adherants. If I judged American Christians based on the actions of the Westboro baptist church I'd have a more accurate view of American Christianity than it appears you do on Islam. Islam, like Christianity has various sects like Catholics, Protestants etc. Billions of Muslims from the majority of sects are moderate to the point of being mostly agnostic. We're talking b…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 11:37 AM
0

Call child protective services. The woman punched you. That is illegal.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 11:02 AM
1

I agree - they are. But just as islamic terrorism could have be avoided by not invading their countries, not fucking them over in 2 world wars and not colonising them in the first place. Nascent Incel terrorism can be headed off at the pass by dealing with the political aggression of extreme feminism.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:54 AM
9

It's not a war! The militaristic language of feminism, like "ally" etc betrays the way they see the relationship between the sexes: adversarial and zero sum. The future is female! ​ That said, Welcome aboard, glad to have you.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:44 AM
201

Aren't these the same kinds of people who think 'toxic masculinity' is a thing? ​ And they think mocking men for penis size will somehow help with that? You don't need a large hadron collider to detect the cognitive dissonance here.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:41 AM
1

But what if you were abused by her? Would you get a standing ovation? Probably not. The bloodlust toward men is becoming palpable.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:47 PM
-1

5 year old article. PLease stop reposting old stuff.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:45 PM
1

Just so you're aware the VAST MAJORITY of Muslims are like the vast majority of Christians when is comes to shit their 'holy book' says.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:35 PM
3

But only rape of the women. If a women pressures a drunk man into sex, she hasn't raped him according to most of them.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:34 PM
7

I used to literally be a feminist. But that was back when women were routinely treated like shit by authority. Now it's a hate group with bizarre theories and paranoid delusions. When they laugh about killing all men and say it's a joke. They mean it - it's a joke. But they do actually also want to kill all men. They just know that to do that, they need a lot of men or "allies". They use the terminology and violent imagery of military conflict. They speak of a "war". They look to a glorious futu…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:22 PM
9

She's about to go postal! Do people still say that? I'm old.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:14 PM
20

Those people should stay the fuck at home.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:51 PM
1

This account takes the piss out of feminists and other woke shite. It's pretty accurate.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:48 PM
2

It might be okay if you're getting married at 20 or something. But who does that?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:33 PM
3

Past history has shown the guardian to be unfriendly towards men's issues That's putting it mildly. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Guardian print a "final solution to the male question".
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:30 PM
5

What man wants a wife that’s had a shit load of sexual partners before him? This canard is so strange to me. Why would you want to marry someone that is totally sexually naiive? And would the same apply to a man? Should women demand virgin males? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:18 PM
5

When feminists imagine men, they only think about the very highest echelon of men. The wealthiest, most powerful men. The Haves. The handsome jocks. THey do not think of the vast majority of men, who like themselves are largely powerless. Don't have a whole lot of money, self confidence or personal attraction to the opposite sex. ​ In other words feminists are bigots. They generalize men and come across as rude, self important assholes to most people. Feminists were not always like this, but a c…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:09 PM
2

"Oh well the majority of them are men" so the fuck what? It's quite easy really. The majority of Peterson's audience (outside of university) are men. Men are evil, therefore Jordan Peterson is wrong about everything. This is as good as a mathematical proof to a misandrist. ​ Of course the majority of Peterson's students are women. And they mostly think he's a 'rockstar professor'.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:59 PM
2

Upvotes to all of you!
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:56 PM
2

In order to enable more women to perform voluntary work in the municipalities, costs for loss of earnings and child care, for example, are to be reimbursed. Waaaaaaaait a minute. Women and only women are to get reimbursement for loss of earnings and childcare? Hows about I quit MY job to do voluntary work in the municipalities? Will the state reimburse me as a man? Is it a man's "place" to never be the 'primary caregiver'?
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:34 PM
3

"Men simply may not champion for their social rights in the public arena in the same way that women historically have due to feelings of shame, potential loss of social status or not wanting to be viewed as less than masculine." ​ Or due to being attacked by a mob of fucking fascist feminists.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:00 PM
20

And this makes these men "useless"?
/r/MensRights01/02/19 01:56 PM
8

"In an interview with police, she said she “inadvertently brushed up against him” and that he took her comments out of context in what was an “emotionally charged situation.”"
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:39 AM
3

I can attest that women write graphic depicitions of sex with significant others and descriptions of body parts etc. Pornographic stuff. And all in public chats and group chats with friends. It's something I wouldnt dream of doing. Are there any mens groups like this? There might be, but Ive never come across one. "locker room talk" is usually about sports...
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:40 PM
2

Rating, sharing intimiate pics with your BFF's. Calling significant others disrespectful names? ​ It's mostly women that do this actually. ​ THere's plenty of Women's facebook groups would make your eyes bleed seeing the shit they right. As far as I can see, when women talk about their husbands or boyfriends, they mainly complain and make fun of them.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:35 PM
44

...what do you exchange her for?
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:30 PM
2

Canada is even more feminised than the US. Mexico? I'm sure the standing army - i.e. the professionals could take care of that. We're talking about draftees, yes? (also I'm ...j.o.k.i.n.g.)
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:54 PM
10

For centuries Women have had it too easy when it comes to war. To redress the balance - and give SJW rhetoric the strength of it's convictions, Only women should register for the draft.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:15 PM
26

Talented? No. Lovely? No. Journalist? No. ​ Thus the laying off.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:13 PM
-3

It's a legal case. Want to pontificate on legal cases? There's nuances. Like PROVING the guy willingly handed her the keys. If she cooerced him in any way it's not necessarily manslaughter - and there's ample reason to query that - Drunk people can be very belligerent. Drunk Women who demand things and don't get their way can get a bit...blackmaily.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:05 PM
-8

It might seem like that. But for manslaughter it has to be proven that he willingly gave her control. Proven. Violence is not the only way to coerce someone. "Give me control of your boat or I will say you raped me" said the drunk woman for instance.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:59 PM
4

So much lost diversity...
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:51 PM
-25

But how do you know she didn't demand the keys or grab them?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:27 PM
8

It hit a submerged log. This is an accident. Death by misadventure. Guy had a bad QC.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:26 PM
2

I appreciate that and I agree entirely - but using that word short circuits some of the pre-prepared drivel they tend to have. And I've yet to come across someone concerned with 'social justice' as they see it - prepared to put up a written or spoken defence of bigotry. They will say "there's no such thing as sexism towards men" but they will not say "it's okay to be bigoted against men". I'm not keen on trying to change minds as I believe it takes a paradigm shift - It did with me. But if I'm g…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:23 PM
2

Did they make you take your page down? Do the feminists have to take their page down? If I was running that school I would ban all social media involvement and smartphones. Infractions come with a penalty of doing 2 extra hours of maths homework every day forever. That'll keep the little fuckers busy.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 11:00 AM
0

At the same time, he's taking the time to make a fuss about some rando making a sexist comment on the twitters 'proving' he is being needlessly sensitive about people being rude about white men on twitter. SO I can see where some people are coming from - just ignore the casual racism and sexism directed at men constantly on gutter outlets like twitter and you'll live a happier life. I tend to agree with that. However there is also a case to be made that the increasing prevalence of casual racism…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 10:42 AM
4

I just avoid the term altogether and use 'bigotry' instead. Pretty clear cut.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 10:26 AM
6

Step one: Leave Twitter to the twits.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:00 PM
5

Abdicated? How about visitation rights?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 01:30 PM
1

Just another cunt.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 01:29 PM
3

The anger men like him feel is not bitterness. Its rage. Im fucking angry abotu this stuff. Not on my own behalf, but for all the young men being unfairly maligned by these evil bastards. This is bigotry and it ought not be tolerated.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:54 PM
1

I would throw everything I've got at these motherfuckers. Write to MP's, write to the chancellor of the University. Write to the papers. Ask for proof of the stats. Ask where the stats are for men?. Ask for a meeting to discuss it. Let them know exactly how you feel. DEAFEN them. You should not meekly accept this bigotry. If feminists start trying to disrupt let them fucking have it with disruption of your own. Apparently the sound of loud male voices terrifies them. Particularly the men.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:50 PM
1

They are bigoted scum.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:14 PM
2

I'm in my late forties. None of the women I know, and I know a good few, think this modern day feminism is anything other than millenials whining. WHat they don't realize, and I'm quite happy to update them, is how bad things have gotten for men - particularly poor men who are involved with a family dispute.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:40 AM
4

If a woman was saying this about a man, I would say this guy is dangerous and you need to leave. My advice to you is no different. This person seems dangerous.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:52 PM
5

They love engaging in shouting at people. Those are not the kind of 'arguments' you want to have.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:43 PM
3

Feminists are like white supremacists or any other bigot. Like the guy below says, just walk away. You can't reason with someone whose hatred has become an internalized religious belief. Her position is an article of faith, not a conclusion arrived at through inquiry.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:40 PM
1

I've actually not seen anyone banned on this sub. We're not just a male version of feminists.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:38 PM
5

Not just women's groups. I see it here on Men's rights too. The group think and confirmation bias leads some to imagine that the world is really terrible and is getting worse, whereas the truth is there's never been a better time to be alive. What's worse about the women's forums is the bad stats that are constantly trotted out and inflated. I believe we are now at 4 out of 3 women are raped hourly in American universities. This is the exact same kind of radicalization you see with some muslim m…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:35 PM
1

Michael Moore is funny. The stuff he did on TV nation back ion the 90's is fantastic. 'Baptising' a row of Protestant houses in Northern Ireland with a Fire Engine full of 'holy water'? That's one brave prank!
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:29 PM
1

If you think it's reasonable for corporations to go about lecturing anyone on morality you're an arsehole.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 05:20 PM
1

But you simply won't answer the question. In fact you are putting quite a lot of effort into dancing around it.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:30 PM
3

I think he's a shithead and wish he would be eaten by wolves. But stopped clock and all that.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:58 PM
1

Either I don't feel oppressed so how could I possibly understand what real oppression is No that would make no sense. At least not to me. The two strands of thought are not connected at all. or I do feel oppressed and then I'm just an idiot convinced that the only reason I don't get what I want is because I'm a victim. yes, I'm just trying to find out if that latter thought is what you think. Obviously not... but strange that you are so coy and find the question so hard to answer. Plenty of peop…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:24 PM
1

Answer the question.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:12 PM
1

Google "proctor and gamble share price". lol.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:12 PM
1

Do you actually go about thinking you are "oppressed"?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 12:42 PM
0

The point is that women and men in America are not oppressed and claiming they are is just fantasy. If the tribulations of women amount to "oppression" then the trials of men do too. So everyone's 'oppressed' . So how does making that distinction matter in any way? It's meaningless.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 05:02 PM
6

According to 'women's aid" Examples of Coercive control are: Isolating you from friends and family Depriving you of basic needs, such as food Monitoring your time Monitoring you via online communication tools or spyware Taking control over aspects of your everyday life, such as where you can go, who you can see, what you can wear and when you can sleep Depriving you access to support services, such as medical services Repeatedly putting you down, such as saying you’re worthless Humiliating, degr…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:23 PM
-1

I believe this is an example of snowflake callout culture.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:01 PM
1

Yes there are degrees, but there's a floor too. It's nonsensical and misleading and divisive to talk about 'oppression' of people in the first world. Blacks in Apartheid South Africa? That's some oppression. Kulaks in Soviet Russia? that's extreme oppression. ​ Since you gave an argument by analogy, I'll give you one by extremes. How oppressed are white male billionaires in America? Not at all you might think. But what if they are democrats under a republican administration - isn't there some pa…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 09:15 AM
0

Rights being 'violated' does not equal 'oppression'. And the women are full of shit with their claims of 'systematic oppression'. It's like listening to a bunch of whiney fucking teenagers. Go to subsaharan Africa if you want to see real 'oppression'.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 04:31 PM
4

Good take on it: ​ https://www.takimag.com/article/yes-women-can-lie/
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:20 PM
2

Is this the grammatical atrocity the world needs now?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:15 PM
1

As far as I know there was a coup de tat of sorts at vice and now its run 100% by neo marxist feminists.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:14 PM
1

The Muslim Uyghurs in China are 'oppressed'. The Palestinians are 'oppressed'. Men in America are not oppressed. Women in America are not oppressed. To suggest they are is laughable. Americans are the world's most pampered people. Even The poorest Americans are not starving, not denied basic human rights, not subject to arbitrary detention or torture. Not bombed from the skies. Fuck sake. There's some minor problems, like you describe, such as divorce rape etc but those things can be worked on. …
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:12 PM
1

Lol there's 'systematic oppression' of women now? ​ What garbage. They need to look up both of those words.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:07 PM
22

The reviews so far are amazing - and by amazing I mean wou will be amazed at the attempts made to sideline the messge of this movie. Example: Variety ​ "Still, while “Brian Banks” went on to win LAFF’s audience award, the question remains: Is this the movie the world needs now, one that casts doubt on survivor testimony and feeds a misogynistic culture’s fear that “good” men can have their lives destroyed by such accusations (while failing to acknowledge how sexual assault can do the same to its…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:05 PM
0

Exactly. Almost every social problem has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with arseholes.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:18 AM
1

This is great. SHow this to women you know.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:14 AM
1

Many of us have tried to talking to feminists. But to take one example - if you post anything at all on /r/feminism you will get banned for being a man most times.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:27 PM
1

The idea of an oppressed male Have you ever been divorced? ​
/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:26 PM
1

Sure. And the Democratic people's republic of North Korea is democratic and a republic...
/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:21 PM
1

"Male forcible intercourse" ​ Lol they can't even admit men get raped. Feminists are pathetic fucking bigoted losers.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:20 PM
2

only for the ladies.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 10:46 AM
1

While they might just "die off", many radical movements inflict great harm to society before doing so. The Kymer Rouge for example.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:24 AM
1

There is of course Marxist Feminism, an understanding of history based on opression - but rather than the opression of the worker by the capitalist, they see the opression of women by men. They are dangerous idiots.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:22 AM
1

Feminism is simply latter day puritanism.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:19 AM
1

I think avarice is the operative emotion.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:18 AM
1

"Bottom line: these people don't care about men. These people don't even care about women. They care about forwarding feminism." ​ You got it. They are puritans. They have always been with us. They use the cloak of moral authority to bully and belittle others in the hopes of increasing their social standing. Today's flavour of outrage: women's rights. In the past they tried alcohol prohibition (also supposedly, to help women from being beaten by their drunk husbands but this was mostly a fantasy…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:13 AM
1

"is a loosely connected and somewhat ill-defined " ​ In other words, is a piece of propaganda.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:08 AM
11

The Bernie Bro's crap again. Lefties eating themselves. Well done chaps and chappesses, you must really love Trump.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 10:45 AM
0

Not a belief in divinity per se or even 'religious feeling', but adherence to one particular sect comes with it a set of assumptions and a-priori beliefs that any reasonable person would have cause to believe would have an influence. Christianity contains some ecumenical doctrine such as the place of women in the church that certainly would pose a potential source for bias, no? Would you readily dismiss as bigotry a warning I might raise about the results of a study into the pitfalls or positive…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:59 AM
-1

"I gather the authors are believing Christians; this does not detract in any way from their work." ​ Er, it kind of does. It certainly presents a possible bias. How did you find out this info about their religious affiliations?
/r/MensRights02/01/19 12:39 PM
-3

it was a stupid thing to say - but consider her audience. She will say whatever it takes to get them on her side. That's politics.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 02:11 PM
45

Good to see more awareness of this - although I fear it is simply lipservice.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 02:10 PM
0

Well her puported sexist mentality. I doubt if Hillary really believes any of this shit, shes just such a politico that it comes reflexively to her. She's a female Quimby.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 12:28 PM
3

True it's a stretch. However Hilldog does helpfully point out that this is a position "only boys have sought" which is utter bullshit. I like Hillary, I wish she was president instead of Trump, but she is too much the politician at times.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 12:26 PM
3

I think those guys get too carried away. Most women, like most men - are decent. But the law, that's not decent. And before the law, men always come second.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 12:01 PM
9

Nit to mention a 14 year old boy would likely be less mature than a 14 year old girl.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 07:11 PM
5

She’s a stupid bloody woman. Is calling a woman who is stupid, sexist? Why so? Are there no stupid women? Is Ann Coulter a stupid woman? All women are smart? Hmm.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 07:09 PM
5

Yeah and the internment camps was a ‘joke’. But how do we feel about people who ‘joke’ about internment camps for migrants or Jews? Wot a larf! Just a bit of yer old genocidal japing your honour. Good old fashion man hating, nothing sinister.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 06:48 PM
1

And what might account for that d’ya think?
/r/MensRights19/12/18 06:45 PM
4

Its the delusional raving of a sick woman. Yet the Guardian sees fit to print it. It’s an embarassment.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 06:43 PM
1

Don't get married. Don't have kids.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 02:16 PM
20

No, it hits women even harder, the way men do.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 02:03 PM
3

if a woman hits you, defend yourself robustly.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:34 PM
1

Its the john gabriel theory of internet fuckwadery. Anonymity + audience = total fuckwad. Welcome to the internet, ladies and other new persons. It’s always been like this since Chrysalis.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:52 PM
2

If testimony is their only evidence, counter testimony ought to be sufficient to obtain a not guilty verdict.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:34 PM
1

"without first offering to the prosecution prior to trail" ​ So it's fine no?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:23 PM
0

Exactly. Also: the Costa Concordia. THere's no reason women can't be just as capable navigators as men. There is however a question about lowering admissions standards for women to achieve artificial parity in some fields - the military being one of them. But that's not at issue here.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:22 PM
2

Spoken like a noob who is ghey.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:38 PM
2

Well precisely. I'm sure Trump on his own gets more abuse than all the women in the world put together. Simply by nature of his 'fame' as it were. A study like this is pretty meaningless unless you do like for like.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:34 PM
3

Well 'decoders' is better than 'tattletales' I suppose.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:32 PM
7

No fault divorce is fine as a concept, In practice the courts believe it's always the man's fault and rule accordingly. Making the man an indentured servant.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 01:19 PM
81

"A more sinister problem is that some of the men who present themselves as victims are in fact offenders. A review of 400 incidents of violence among couples by Marianne Hester of the University of Bristol found that about half of men recorded by the police as victims were named as perpetrators in other incidents involving the same partner. This is one reason why men seeking access to refuges and other services are screened, to make sure they do not pose a danger to others." ​ Are the women simi…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 12:50 PM
32

The typical retort from most feminists arguing with a man is to question a man's virility or sexual attractiveness. And these same people go on about 'toxic masculinity'. ​
/r/MensRights14/12/18 12:46 PM
1

Nah its 438 percentz.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 07:11 PM
1

Feminists keep saying men and women can’t work together.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 07:08 PM
1

He didn’t say they can’t...
/r/MensRights12/12/18 07:08 PM
1

Sexual assault meaning ‘he looked at me, your honour’.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 07:01 PM
3

Or he looked at me.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 07:01 PM
2

Separate women’s everything! Separate entrances and restaurant sections! Separate bus sections! Lets ask the Taliban for tips...
/r/MensRights12/12/18 06:59 PM
8

Just ban music. Lets get this puritan future off to a flying start.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 06:55 PM
4

Exactly. If a further retort made reference to the 'time of the month', etc that MP would be a gonner.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 02:23 PM
3

9 comments "I can't believe you let these stupid MEN tell you what to do, Elizabeth" ​ - pretty much every line in the movie.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 02:20 PM
2

Those are the excuses they make, but seriously - subject another human being to a decade or more in jail just to save face or exact a petty revenge? Thats the behaviour of a full blown psychopath. And psychopathy is rare. I think it has to do with the dehumanization of men by feminists. These women don’t think men are fully real human beings.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 08:07 AM
2

Sounds like men and women are NOT equal in Denmark.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:24 PM
2

Im not sure why these girls, not just specifically here, but in universities in general, go out of their way to report consensual sex as rape. What’s driving it? Who wants the hassle and what do they get out if it?
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:16 PM
1

Id be happy too, if I got cool tank goggles with my tank.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:09 PM
2

Boys and girls deserve to be protected from sleazy adults - at the same time societal reactions to this are hypocritical and absurdly puritanical.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:08 PM
2

Thats simply because the puritans are in charge. 20 years for this crime is an absurd overreaction.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:06 PM
1

Hugely so.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:04 PM
3

Feminism is like fascism: hateful, deranged and bigoted.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 10:36 AM
5

Sure. It was he same with the Nazis. Just a few bad apples... mmhmm.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 10:33 AM
5

Being anti feminism IS being pro equality is as much that being anti-fascist is being pro freedom.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 09:05 AM
2

Yeah and those guys are fucking arseholes. Newsflash: so are the women that do the same thing. Those women are called feminists.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 09:02 AM
4

Ive never met one of these women either, but I’m starting to think a lot of women think this way in secret. They know its wrong and shameful, but given the anonymity and platform of the internet the poisonous bigotry pours out.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 08:49 AM
0

I do feel blessed. Lol.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 08:40 AM
1

By ‘we’ surely they just mean Americans. The UK is governed by women. It’s not going well. Germany is governed by a new women, the old one having left. Etc. In other words women run and have run many countries, to no appreciable good effect. In fact most female heads of state have been war mongering right wing assholes like Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 01:35 PM
2

Jessica Valenti - the thinking woman’s Rush Limbaugh.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 01:22 PM
0

I don’t know any women that actively support feminism beyond saying ‘I’m a feminist’ and buying a tshirt.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 01:20 PM
1

Shes right about that at least.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:54 AM
1

Its a stupid article thats full of heresay and very light on support for the claim made in the headline.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:49 AM
-2

They support it in the abstract. Like Americans supporting Israel. Ask a women to actually seriously look into it and they realise its psychotic.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:48 AM
1

Well I mean, he’s right. Just politely tell the women to stay the fuck out or else, lol.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:35 AM
1

Sorry it’s common knowledge. You need sources for that? Try the various UN resolutions asking them to stop it. Also it’s a common tactic of mendacious pro Israelers to demand sources and then claim the sources are ‘biased’ - and of course when it comes to wrongdoing all sources ARE going to be biased against the wrongdoer. https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180212-60-of-palestine-children-arrested-by-israel-tortured/amp/ https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/inde…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:00 AM
0

Israel subjects children to torture.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 02:01 PM
17

Or slowly feed them into a tree shredder feet first.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 01:41 PM
2

To be clear, a commenter said that. But the author and the commenter exchanged several mutually supportive posts. Sickening bigotry on that site. Actual fascism, complete with support for eugenics.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 01:31 PM
-4

Oh yes. Far less healthy. These people are deranged.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:32 PM
4

"I think we should take all the fat men to the Arctic and feed them to polar bears rather than provide them with sex dolls" ​ Femi...nazi?
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:30 PM
7

"It wouldn't matter a damn if that meant millions of mean never procreated again. Would be a very good thing in fact as the gene pool would be massively cleansed" ​ I mean I always thought the term "feminazi' was a satirical putdown not a mere adjective.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:14 PM
-9

I say great, give him the doll, and pull out the pin at the back that's connected to the detonation timer.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:02 PM
32

Dude it's already that way. Female masturbation is wonderful and empowering and all that jazz. Male masturbation is wrong and gross and unnatural and sick.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:01 PM
-1

lol sometimes?
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:58 PM
1

Whereas of course you should have called the cops and tried to have her life ruined. That would be 'equality'.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:54 PM
35

According to feminists women and men are equal, but women don't lie, are better at handling emotions, are better at multi-tasking, are more virtuous in general and probably better for the environment.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:49 PM
5

Using feminist logic one could say that sex dolls at the very least, are LESS dehumanizing than dildos etc since it's a facsimile of a whole women rather than a disembodied dick - I mean what does that say about what women want from men? Lol.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:45 PM
0

Yeah but is the essay satire? Jonathan Swift didn’t really want to eat babies.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 07:52 PM
9

That would make my wife happy.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:38 PM
5

No. Although some radfems have pitched selectively aborting male babies to skew the population female. Hard to know if they were joking or not.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:34 PM
2

But the state has its thumb on the scales for one gender only.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:41 PM
2

"a woman who has a long history of respecting men and..." ​ No. Don't get married. Don't have kids. Not until the laws change. You will become an indentured servant.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:40 PM
87

So what happens after they get started? Some sort of eugenics program to eliminate men?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:59 AM
2

Park there. When confronted, tell them to fuck off. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 02:32 PM
5

Men have to step up, she said, and “not let fear be a barrier.” ​ Men HAVE to step up? OR Ought to? And why? What's in it for men? As far as I can see, nothing except more blackmail, more blame and less respect.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 02:29 PM
8

I think they hear people say the word and don't hear the 'ed' part. At the same time they're not big readers, so they don't see it in print a lot.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 02:43 PM
1

One question: Don't these boys have mothers?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 01:00 PM
53

I wish people would use stop using 'bias' when they mean 'biased'.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 12:12 PM
3

Well, the wording is "women make 85% of purchase decisions". Marketers and advertisers and media buyers proceed on that basis. Anecdotally all you have to do is walk in to any Mall or department store and look at what's on offer exclusively for women and compare it with the floor space for men.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 09:19 AM
19

Women spend 85% of the money. The market IS women.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 08:59 PM
14

Hmm maybe ask Lowes if they have a ‘no Jews’ range. Or a ‘Jews only’ range. FFS.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 08:59 PM
1

Well in this case he’s mistakenly misusing the term ‘strongman’ as in, an autocratic leader, like Margaret Thatcher. It doesn’t literally mean a male person who possesses uncommon physical strength or strength of character. Which would indicate the author is a pseudo- intellectual.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:08 PM
4

Plenty of people on here - like myself are left wing in the sense that we support social programs such as universal health care, state support for the unemployed etc you don’t have to be ‘far right’ to see the very raw deal men get from the state and the media.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:03 PM
4

You might be a 'natural working mule'. Me? I'm the one giving the orders, sonny and my kids are just fine. But any young man looking down the barrel of state sponsored indentured servitude - which is what marriage has become - needs their eyes wide open.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 05:27 PM
2

When enough men eschew families and long term relationships things will change for the better.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 05:14 PM
1

The Vietcong that HAD tanks and artillery, very good jet fighters, better rifles than the US, a massive amount of air defence batteries, plus 2 superpowers backing them? As far as Iraq and Afghanistan is concerned - they didn't win. Their countries were destroyed by Neocon lunatics. Their people scattered and killed. Hundreds of thousands died for very small loss of American military personnel by comparison. Were US goals achieved? The goal was regime change in Iraq - that mission was handily ac…
/r/MensRights22/11/18 05:09 PM
5

Feminists don't allow one.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 03:12 PM
2

There are pretty much NO domestic violent shelters for men. And if you try to open one, Feminists will show up to stop you.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 03:12 PM
-1

That's a retarded comment. How do you plan on defeating the conventional armed forces of the state with your small arms? Arm the populace with artillery, close air support, main battle tanks and the like? you'd still lose because the general population are not drilled and will break under fire. The days of VIOLENT revolution are over.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 03:09 PM
2

Thank you. You're a great mom.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 02:59 PM
6

That system is called feminism.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 02:33 PM
1

find a nice conservative woman to make a life with Then one day out of the blue she turns into a feminist and you realize you are an indentured sevant. DO NOT get married. DO NOT have kids.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 02:31 PM
1

Bingo, if anything this third wave is less hysterical than the last one, but just as bigoted and evil.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:49 PM
6

No, Government is not the enemy. Feminism is the enemy. It is feminists who influence governments to throttle the life out of men. Government is run by a powerful minority alright, but it is the fact that they are powerful and not the fact that they are men that is salient. A government of powerful women would be no different. Lobbyists and money sway votes. Men do not have a lobby to argue for their aggregate cause. Feminists do and their goals include the destruction of the family unit and the…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:49 PM
1

Feminists are bigoted motherfuckers. They are the female KKK.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:46 PM
1

Or education where it makes a difference to future generations?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:45 PM
1

"We both agree that demilitarization and peace is possible" ​ What does this mean? Most of the world is at peace and has been since 1945. There's been significant regional conflicts and a lot of low level conflicts but largely the world is now more peaceful than it has been in the past.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:44 PM
2

If your ears are improperly cleaned they can get infected. Should you cut off your ears? Somehow hundreds of millions of European men get by just fine without having their sexual organs deliberately mutiliated.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:36 PM
2

Circumcision should be illegal and its practicioners jailed at a minimum. Although if it were up to me, a thorough beating would be par for the course.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:34 PM
1

Bigots
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:40 PM
4

They just mean ‘be handsome’
/r/MensRights18/11/18 07:51 PM
2

Creeps are bad mmkay. But for instance, if you work for Netflix, looking at a coworker for longer than 5 seconds is prohibited. There is such a thing as ‘going overboard’.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 07:47 PM
3

There will be a string of ‘humorous’ articles laughing about issues raised. Haha! Men commiting suicide! Lol women attempt it more often anyways! Lol etc.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:02 PM
3

Ask her for the correct address to file legal papers.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:04 AM
3

Contact a lawyer.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:03 AM
25

Wow. Havent seen anything that forthright in a leading piblication in 20 years. The balls on Forbes for publishing it!
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:00 AM
1

Bad horse.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:57 AM
1

er, it doesn't mean the penis owner did either.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:37 AM
-1

Nice one with the "stupid Irish" jokes. High level comedy. Got any jokes about thrifty Jews?
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:35 AM
47

The photo of her at her desk (her officvial student union president desk) has a "the future is female" sign. What of male students? Do they not figure in this future? Little nazi bitch.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:19 AM
2

Sounds like 'the future is communism' to me. Lol.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:13 AM
2

arklatexhomepage.com/news/l... You can't get more diverse than a team comprised entirely of one gender.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 12:54 PM
4

PREFERENCES GIVEN TO THOSE AT A SOCIAL DISADVANTAGE Well you might point out that that includes you does it not? Men are at a social disadvantage when it coms to university. A significant disadvantage, by several metrics.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 12:33 PM
4

First time I lived in America, I went to a gym and in the changing rooms I was like “I had no IDEA there was this many Jewish guys in America”. then when I found out it was normal practice I couldn’t understand why you would willingly mutilate your penis (of all the things to mutilate!) unless God basically said “you have to”. So there you are, not the least bit Muslim, or Jewish, still lopping off your foreskins. It defies belief. It’s like an amazingly successful racket or something. 50 years …
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:18 PM
4

This is just some idiot.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:50 PM
6

Tell her, you'll do it if she will... The reason people in Europe don't do it is that people in Europe are not as fucked in the head as Americans generally. There's no reasonable reason to mutilate your sexual organs. If she thinks it's creepy, she's a creep. If she "doesn't know what to do with it" that's fine - she doesn't have to do anything with it, it's your body, not hers. Last point - she sounds like a really selfish asshole and borderline psycopathic. I would leave her as soon as possibl…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:41 PM
2

So there won't be a WHOLE lot of Battlefield V videos going up then?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:39 PM
18

The first to make a rape accusation always has the upper hand. It's that stupid.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:33 PM
4

Well, you and whose army honey? Last I checked the men have most of the guns and pacific fleets. Be thankful most men are nice.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:10 PM
2

"form your own groups to deal with the issues men face" >forms own group "misogyny!"
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:09 PM
2

Yes, as you say, the vast majority of women jn feminist groups do not support extremist views. But the minority that do, are in the driving seat. And it is their demands, prejudices and fears that drive the policies (like the Duluth model and the Violence Against Women Act) which place men at a legal disadvantage instead of a level playing field. It is their castigation, pejorative framing and propaganda that causes newspapers and other media to seek only to redress the grievances of women, whil…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 10:36 PM
7

I'm afraid you are quite wrong about the niche extremists. Not that there are niche extremists - of course these views are only shared by niche extremists and not by the majority of those who label themselves feminists. But you make the common error of supposing that the niche extremeists are on the fringes of the movement. They in fact comprise the core of the movement. They compose the dogma, teach the courses, write the books, discipline the outliers, run the formal organisations, set the age…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:35 AM
9

healing men Whoever said it was about 'healing men'? A lot of us have woken up to the fact that feminism is a hate cult bent on destroying men through social engineering. This is their overt goal, it's in their literature. And they are being very successful. Were the original suffragists about "healing women"? NO! they were all about getting women the vote, and bloody right they were too! This sub is about Mens RIGHTS. Not healing men, or men's feelings or any of that blather. And don't make the…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:25 AM
14

The system was broken and made dangerous by feminists, on purpose.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:19 AM
5

Feminists hate marriage and want it destroyed. In the feminist utopia, the state raises children and men are servants for the women who rule wisely in an agrarian society devoid of heavy industry. You should read their literature, it's unbelieveable the views serious, academic feminists really hold. If most women who identify as 'feminists' knew what they were actually supporting I imagine most would shun it.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:19 AM
6

Being anti-feminism is not 'anti-women' anymore than being anti- the KKK is being anti-men. Feminism is a hate cult bent on the destruction of men's lives at any cost. That's the way it walks and that's the way it talks. Just because they advertise themselves as "for equality" when pushed back upon, doesn't make it so.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:14 AM
4

femanism?
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:12 PM
58

This monster is just a pure misandrist.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:10 PM
3

Exude. But extruding it would be really trippy.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:17 PM
2

No, Myra Hindley.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:14 PM
2

I spent 5 minutes on that sub. Bunch of shitheads.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 06:30 PM
8

Thank goodness.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 06:21 PM
1

lol. Get some sleep man!
/r/MensRights02/11/18 03:30 PM
2

Only listen and believe feminist women who support the Democratic Party. Not those Republican women. Or non-feminist women. In other words they are exhorting us to not believe most women.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 03:24 PM
1

Did you have some sort of head trauma?
/r/MensRights02/11/18 03:22 PM
11

Joran Peterson is quite clear that he is not "alt-right". Nevertheless the communists on the left consider any pushback to be fascism/ Therefore the alt-right are fascists and Peterson is a fascist etc.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:18 AM
3

Women do rape men though. At about the same rate as men rape women.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:15 AM
1

the vast majority. Walk into any clothing store. How much space is reserved for women's clothing? how much for men? Look at the high street, how many shops sell women's stuff exclusively?, how many shops for men? There you go.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 01:47 PM
1

Shouldn't he expect equality? hahahha!
/r/MensRights01/11/18 01:40 PM
5

These particular women are numerically illiterate and the one giving the lecture is incompetent. No wonder she 'gets paid less'. (she doesn't get paid less).
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:31 AM
2

Many feminists do want to 'kill all men'. Unironically, finally and seriously. People didn't take Hitler seriously either. Or Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines in Rwanda. Not that they have a chance of committing genocide of course, what with the majority of the Army and Police staffed by men. But the desire is there.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 11:08 AM
1

Today, however, a fatuous statement can cross the world in a matter of minutes and turn a lone student tweeter into a lightning conductor for global derision, resulting in deep personal shock. It's 'silly' because it's not directed at them. A man shooting his mouth off about white women would be seen as threatening. He may even recieve a visit from the police for a "hatecrime".
/r/MensRights30/10/18 11:05 AM
2

Yep do this at least, for a laugh.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 09:11 PM
2

She sounds very very dangerous. Get another job.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 09:07 PM
1

Women ate also unhappy with it. Article from leeds in the UK with some woman moaning about it being ‘sexist’
/r/MensRights28/10/18 09:03 PM
4

She’ll be crucified.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 08:41 PM
5

It cane across as confused not focused. I Agree with the sentiment but the delivery could use work.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:36 PM
5

This is the mechanism by which Hutus carve up Tutsis, Jews end up in gas chambers despite being in a ‘modern, civil society’ and ‘civilised’ British soldiers behead Mau Mau nationalists in the 1950’s. It’s called dehumanization and it’s usually fatal for the dehumanized.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:47 AM
1

Thats a crazy blog. One post, entitled “I am entitled to say men are trash” states within: “ My experiences have taught me to hate the concept of men”. She doesn’t even like the concept!
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:41 AM
19

The men in this mural didnt. They died for their belief that they were keeping people of their country safe from harm. Do you hate Chinese people for the ‘great leap forward’ which killed 10’s of millions? Lot of blood on a lot of hands there. Do you hate Mexican people because those cartels are BAD people. And remember the Aztecs? Shocking. What about black people, hate them? You gotta hear some of the shit that went down in Angola, Rwanda, the Congo, etc. What about Arabic people? They have qu…
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:15 PM
2

1996
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:46 PM
233

It was worse, the ‘primary victims’. Men are only secondary victims since they only lose their lives. The women lose their servants!
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:18 PM
320

“I never meant to disrespect anyone” she says. Except white men of course, they’re not people.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:17 PM
1

I would contact the police.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:14 PM
2

But its not them, they are reading a poem written by another woman. So they are making the personal, political. People should stop doing that.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:13 PM
3

This is farcical. ‘Women’ have nothing to apologize for for fuck sake. Anymore than ‘men’ do. What is this collectivist insanity?
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:23 PM
1

Damn right.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:01 PM
0

Yeah I mean there are a lot of knuckledraggers, make no mistake. But this recent vilification of men gives them an out to be as macho and vile as they want to be with the political cover that their crappy attitudes towards women are derived from feminist led oppression and not just being dickheads.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 03:25 PM
1

Haha. Okay.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 03:21 PM
2

I'd say post metoo that number is well over 50%. But of them I'd say 99% have no idea what opinions and political platforms professional, academic feminists actually hold. If you explained to them what feminists actually think about family life, for one, most of them would be fucking appalled. Nevermind their totalitarian views on men, economics and property rights.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:36 PM
4

There's an underlying biological imperative to shit. But I take care to shit in toilets.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:32 PM
2

men! I assume the endgame is genocide but seeing as the armed forces are generally of the male persuasion, I can't see it really happening.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:30 PM
1

Yeah but we're really handing those icebergs their assess these days.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:20 PM
8

They're not just racist and sexist, they've become full on identitarians.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:19 PM
10

Well I often hear that "women are angry" online in in print media. But in the last year I've heard from real actual men, that they too are angry. Very angry. That's not good.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:18 PM
1

That's not really true. I don't feel that way. Most men and women I know don't feel that way AT ALL. In fact I'd put a bet on the majority of my entire generation not feeling that way. It might be true for young people, Im in my late 40's.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 01:55 PM
4

Well thsoe people get some attention. But the real problem is those in institutional positions of power, in the media and in the civil service who do their damndest to promote bigoted hatred and fear of men and change laws and procedures to that end.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 01:52 PM
3

Used to be. But women from all walks of life are now seeing the power that comes with jumping on a political bandwagon that's careening downhill. There's going to be one hell of a mess when it hits the bottom.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 01:50 PM
3

It's pure bigotry. It's vile and reminds me of Nazi propaganda.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:26 AM
2

lol
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:26 AM
5

"hatecrimes' are bullshit. Either a thing is a crime or it isn't. Giving longer sentences because it's a 'hatecrime' is not going to deter assholes who commit crimes, but it is going to energize the knuckledraggers whose grievance bars need refilling. Of course the identiarians hate it when the flaw in their little plan is revealed. EVERYONE is in a special group! But we only want hate crimes to exist for the groups WE like. Not those other groups! Fuck these people. I 'hate' them. Is that a cri…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:04 AM
1

Sell them ‘real’ locks of Kavanaughs public hair
/r/MensRights16/10/18 05:49 PM
1

Sweet aphorism. 10 points.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 05:45 PM
9

I choose my words carefully.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 12:31 PM
1

I think the metoo campaign to end the disgusting casting couch phenomonon was fine and probably much needed. I think it has been coopted by the political left to fish for female votes. ​
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:11 AM
1

Men are treated like shit - that's pretty much it in a nutshell. White men have the added bonus of being presumed to be in the 1% of the 1% for some UNFATHOMABLE reason. Like, we're all handsome, muscular billionaire CEO's or something.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:05 AM
1

Exactly. Its infuriating. It's like saying to some guy in a wheelchair to solve his problems by 'talking about them'. The problem is the problem, not the lack of talking about it.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:03 AM
13

Get. A. Lawyer. You need to file a restraining order on this woman for starters. Then look into suing the fuck out of her.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:35 AM
2

They are the mirror image of overweight red-faced men in their 60's who watch nothing but Fox News and get angry at "the Arabs".
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:26 AM
1

...and preferably don't finger the potatoes
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:23 AM
13

She seems like a lady with her head well screwed on.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:18 AM
10

True but the new rules dictated from on high by Feminism demand you ask about every single little thing, every single time. Which is nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:17 AM
2

Never at all. Not one time.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 08:59 AM
1

it’s a due process story. And white men deserve due process just as much as black men, when white women accuse them of rape.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 12:39 PM
18

Are you being deliberately obtuse?
/r/MensRights13/10/18 03:57 PM
2

Absolutely no attempt to understand the other side of the problem. Thus it will go unsolved. Childish.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 08:20 AM
7

that boys without fathers are better off than boys with fathers.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:04 PM
2

In the 70's and 80's if a women said she was a feminist, it just meant she wasn't taking any shit from jerks and good for her. This days she's more likely to be communist authoritarian and the 'enemy of the people' is white men. ​ It's a short walk for communist revolutionaries, from demanding equality of outcome to stacking human skulls into pyramids.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:53 AM
3

Holy shit. Literally. Did someone tell Jordan Peterson yet?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:30 PM
1

Wow!
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:29 PM
1

Who the fuck said anything about Kavanaugh. Separate topic. Curfews. Men. Keep up.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 09:35 PM
5

Yeah this is my problem with this anti-male bigotry.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:50 PM
5

Thought experiments have a funny way of becoming socially enforced laws these days, like guilty until proven innocent with metoo.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:31 PM
4

Its basically a feminist sub full of pompous shitheads
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:01 PM
1

HR probably.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 12:39 PM
1

The thing is, half their userbase are not women. This marketing is poorly thought out.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:14 AM
15

Simply incorporate somewhere else.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:09 AM
2

Some things seem like self fulfilling prophecies.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:20 AM
4

I'm liberal. Democrats are the new puritans. That doesn't mean I support Republicans. Or Trump who is a dangerously incompetent buffoon.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 11:42 AM
1

https://quillette.com/2018/08/08/moral-panic-then-and-now/ These panics have shared features. Sex figures as a preternatural danger, emotion swamps reason, monsters abound, and protection demands any sacrifice. JoAnn Wypijewski
/r/TheRedPill28/09/18 10:04 AM
1

PMRC all over agin.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:00 AM
26

We are living through a moral panic. ​ And this is a literal truth. If you glance at TwoX today you will see countless accounts by women talking about how "panicked" they feel. They are "racking their brains" to remember if they have ever been raped. Monsters abound. A dark force is stalking the land. There needs to be a human sacrifice. Aha I now I remember, it was YEARS ago - yes, I WAS raped. I think. I saw him put poison the well. Burn him. Burn them ALL. ​ Strange when you remove yourself f…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:58 AM
2

Sadly at this point I have to finally concede this is true.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:04 PM
8

It's the power of social media to form instant mobs. It's not just SJW types. THe problem is more pervasive and even includes intra national conflicts and attempts by these actors to cause disruption to society. It's a far bigger problem than just intra-gender conflict.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:18 AM
3

2-10%. Lets take the median: 4%. 4% false accusations is incredibly high. That means there are tens of thousands of falsely accused men. That would not be insignificant - thats would be an epidemic IF IT WERE THAT LOW. ​ A rape accusation is a life sentence. Imagine if 4% of passenger airlines crashed. Or if 4% of brake cables failed on cars. 4% is alarming. 10% is very alarming. But it could be even higher.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:15 AM
1

Im upset with your inability to comprehend elementary logic. Nothing to do whatsoever with Feminism.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 02:47 PM
1

Yes, I’m sure about that. Lady, you are an ignoramus. Your ‘argument’ such as it was, was simply to rebut the previous commenter with a dictionary definition of Feminism, which the real life movement does not match AT ALL. If you cannot understand or will not understand that giving you another example of a definition not matching up to the real scenario is a fair means of argumentation then you are either being willfully obtuse or you are too stupid and/or ignorant to converse about these things…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 02:43 PM
1

You should read that straw man fallacy definition, since you don’t seem to understand it. Maybe it’s something you’ve heard that ‘sounds cool’. But you are using it incorrectly, which makes you sound foolish. I haven’t intentionally misrepresented your position. Your position is that because the dictionary definition of Feminism is ‘equality between men and women’ the de-facto state of Feminism must be the same. My argument is simply to demonstrate via a colorful example that things are not alwa…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 02:15 PM
-1

Says you.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:54 PM
1

‘By definition’, The “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea” is a republic and democratic. Saying it doesn’t necessarily make it so. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:48 PM
-1

Thats bollocks. Left / right have nothing to do with gender differences.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:02 PM
10

Im sure there were ‘reasonable’ fascists in pre war Italy too. Too bad the radicals and the psychopaths are the ones driving changes in the law and making life difficult for ordinary, decent men which is nearly all of them. So you’re a good feminist, you believe in equality- great, so do the majority of people. But the majority of people reject feminism because it is against families, against men and clearly more interested in revanchist retribution and fantasies of persecution than amending the…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:45 PM
1

Accusation incoming. Christ, any fool could it for a prank, just to see the look on Joe’s face. What a fool.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:36 PM
4

#Metoo is fascism. Feminist writers said they didn't care if innocent men lost their careers over it. There WERE false allegations. There were suicides. Demanding that men lose their careers INSTANTLY and without any kind of investigation is simply barbaric. And what about the families of men accused? I'm talking accused here - not guilty of anything. This so called 'movement' is clearly led by psychopathic personalities far more interested in inflicting ruin on men than any sense of justice. Me…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:51 PM
1

As I always say to this shit: Fine. But we're going to start charging the rest of the population for having kids. Want future taxpayers? Fork it over.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:43 PM
1

Natasha McElhone says "It's uniting women". It is. Stronger together! That's why the symbol of Italian fascism was a bundle of rods - the origin of the term coming from Fascio, meaning a bundle or sheaf. Of course "Social Justice" in general has ben moving towards fascism for a long time. Robert Paxton says that fascism is "a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity. ​ Th…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:39 PM
1

That was a class struggle thing rather than a feminism thing. Feminism had fuck all to do with women getting the vote. The so called lower classes had had quite enough of being canon fodder for idiot kings after the slaughter of the great war and demanded the franchise over the implied threat of revolution.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:44 PM
5

Also the internet “gave birth”. It’s a female internet. Sadly one of it’s children was that deformed cripple, the manosphere... a nebulus hades encircled by a necroticly bubbling stew of incels, neckbeards and other not-hot guys she doesn’t want to date.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:41 PM
2

haha. Brilliant.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 03:07 PM
14

Retributional feminism. Because women used not to have the vote, FUCK ALL THE MEN NOW, TODAY. But I guarantee you , if you call her on this opinion, she will flee back to her bailey and claim feminism is only about 'equality', and does not contain an atom of vindictive misandry born of historical grievances.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 02:53 PM
9

"the emergence of the internet gave birth to the so-called “manosphere,” a dark hole of blogs and websites and forums" ​ We're in a dark hole, guys. Contributing reporter, CANDICE WANG thinks so, anyways.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 02:51 PM
29

Yes exactly. The opeds were all "this is great movie. More women should kill and frame people to get what they want. Girl power!" That's what passes for sane, rational discourse these days.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 02:43 PM
8

When it came out, women were cheering on the murderess.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 02:42 PM
1

Why would you queue for coffee? How hard is it to make friggen coffee?
/r/MensRights17/09/18 02:41 PM
0

Donkey!
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:49 PM
2

Typical multi-millionaire abusing the help.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:46 PM
1

You need lessons in logic. How in the fuck is an organisation ‘pointless’ if it benefits it’s members, when the point of the organisation IS TO BENEFIT THE MEMBERS. Outsiders are not “getting screwed” they are simply not deriving the benefits of membership. Nor should they since they don’t contribute to the budget or have to abide by the rules and regulations. The EU exists for EU citizens. Don’t want to be in the club? Fine, bye. But don’t demand to get for free what the rest of us pay for.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 01:30 PM
1

Why should a country outside the Union get the same sweet deal countries in the Union get? the whole point of the club is preferential treatment of the members.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:53 PM
1

Exactly, nobody knows what will happen. Chaos: the property of a complex system whose behaviour is so unpredictable as to appear random, owing to great sensitivity to small changes in conditions. It’s irresponsible in the extreme to plunge a nation of tens of millions into a completely uncertain future on a leap of faith. This is the essence of my bemusement with it. But l’m just an onlooker. Maybe it will be fine. But I wouldn’t do that to my pension, much less a major economy.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:51 PM
1

Well good for you, because I love asking pro brexit English people when they intend to disband the monarchy ;) but seriously, this whole endeavor would make a lot more sense if it was “we’re leaving the EU by 2050” and had a roadmap and ideas and a sense of a purposeful destination....as it is, good luck - its going to be fucking chaos. :(
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:39 PM
1

Rather like the House of Lords except that there are no hereditary peers and they do not have the job for life. So nothing like the House of Lords. Do you read any papers apart from Rupert Murdoch’s? Also your cabinet ministers are appointed, not directly elected, so for the third and final time, your point about the supposed democratic deficit of the EU is baseless and every child in France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands and the rest know this..are are not a bit fooled by the propaganda …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:13 PM
2

Most people in the EU support the EU, just not English people. The Scots and Northern Irish voted remain, didn’t they? Lol you tried the unelected shit on me. Your prime minister is unelected too. Your ministers also are unelected. Only a simpleton would buy that argument. Do you even know how the EU works? Do you imagine EU representatives are feudal lords or something? Anyway you’ve made your bed now. Majority of Europeans are happy to see Britain go, arrogant, deluded people that you are. You…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:05 PM
0

Im not British and I don’t give a crap about it, but you people shot yourselves in the ass by voting to leave the cushiest country club for countries in the world. Membership has it’s privileges. Also your Prime minister and entire ministerial bench are not ‘directly elected’ so don’t bother with any of this ‘unelected eurocrats’ whining.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:31 PM
16

I agree. But I hate this new “deep state” phrase. It makes them sound hyper competent, patriotic and clandestine. This is the civil service we are talking about. It skews female. It’s not competent at all and it’s right out in the open. The civil fucking service, not some group of cold war espionage mentats.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:49 PM
2

If you want to drive by and insult whole cadres of people and make smug assertions about me specifically, don't be surprised if I tell you where to get off, bud.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:25 PM
6

The sanitary reason is beyond ridiculous. You may as well council people to slice off their ears. After all those helical folds could accumulate dirt, if you never washed. And you can still hear pretty good without them.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:01 PM
6

That's the problem. It's cultural inertia.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:59 PM
2

I'm just insulting you out of the blue am I? I have no cause to do so? You've said nothing objectionable?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:56 PM
2

Since you asked, I volunteer at a men's resource centre. I also work on a pro-bono basis for a homeless charity which provides emergency accomodation to either gender, but since men are overwhelmingly more likely to be made homeless this is essentially gendered help. Oh and I kick a monthly amount to a charity fighting deforestation in Borneo and another aiding refugees - primarily from Syria. I don't like disclosing this stuff since it seems like bragging and as someone raised Christian it goes…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:36 PM
16

experiencing physical or sexual violence in their lifetime? ​ yah, thats 100% of men. 100%.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:25 PM
5

It depends on the type of immigration Exactly. Ask the Palestinians how Jewish immigration worked out for them.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:01 PM
1

You have no idea what I DO. Asshole.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:56 PM
3

Zero time in jail is very much MIN sentencing. She should have been awarded a custodial sentence for trying to ruin the man's life and wasting considerable police and court resources and attempting to pervert the course of justice. Intentions are important. Attempted murder is a crime after all. Following her incarceration, she should be paying maintenance to HIM since the purpose of alimony is to limit any unfair economic effects of a divorce. Nothing idiotic about that. Alimony is often a de-f…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:41 AM
2

Fire them. 2. Quit and write a letter explaining why, which names names. The CEO clearly only cares about pandering to these monsters.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:49 AM
16

You also pay a fee each month Well the Alimony does. You also have to consent to searches of your self and home pretty much whenever asked. Fine. None of this seems much more than minor inconvenience. As long as she keeps her nose clean she has nothing to worry about, except maybe a corrupt cop taking advantage. She did put her husband in danger by faking her kidnapping; the danger of police believing her husband was behind it and incarcerating him for a decade, no? That's what I understand was …
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:55 AM
23

7 years of probation seems like no punishment at all to me.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:58 AM
39

Until now it's been accepted that this is a fair, rational and normal way to deal with men in divorce situations. Men are coming to realise that the system regards them as just so much canon fodder, just a meal ticket for women.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:57 AM
36

"violated her probation by falling behind on her restitution and court fees" ​ Which her husband has to pay...
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:55 AM
1

It’s a sympathetic article. I read another article in the expecspectator that stated men who kill their families and themselves do so because of ‘toxic masculinity’ and that this toxicity is an inherent rather than emergent property of being male. In short, bigotry on a phrenology level. Men needed to buck up and stop with all the murder-suicide was the vicious, heartless, psychopathic takeaway, but they can’t because-they-are-animals. Supported by ad content from major corporations. I am not a.…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:16 PM
2

Yup
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:47 AM
2

Its mob fucking rule. People losing their jobs, committing suicide. There’s justice - which requires a dispassionate examination of the facts and there’s these lynch mobs which demand heads on stakes based solely on gender and skin color. Its disgusting and sadly very predictable. This is the 3rd moral panic I’ve lived through and the setup and course of events is identicle here.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 12:34 PM
2

Mob rule is not preferable.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 08:06 PM
5

Are you saying he never asked or that he whipped it out after someone said no? According to LCK: ““At the time, I said to myself that what I did was okay because I never showed a woman my dick without asking first,” he wrote, claiming he never learned until it was “too late” that power differentials could make those women feel overpowered or coerced.” According to one of the women who were subjected to his lewd behaviour: “It was something that I knew was wrong,” said the woman, who described si…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 08:04 PM
3

This is how you create psycopaths
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:08 PM
3

Would you feel the same way about a 19 year old man having sex with a 14 year old girl?
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:26 AM
9

"The now-mother of three was convicted at 19 for having sex with a 14-year-old male," ​ Never rapist. Women can't be rapists of course.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:24 AM
1

The people pointing out ‘witches’ in Salem were young white women.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:04 AM
16

Im nearly 50. My parents were army. They hated political correctness when it became a thing in the eighties. They always voted for left wing candidates. I hate sjw’s and feminists. I vote for left wing candidates. But its getting hard to continue. The right fields candidates I find it hard to support. They seem to be profoundly ignorant people. But at the same time they seem genuine. Left wing candidates come across as bigots. They talk like zealots who hate white men. Nobody in their right mind…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:09 AM
1

...this message was approved by Sarah Jeong.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 09:16 AM
2

Yes. But the crucial difference is those knuckleheads are not given a platform in the msm to regurgitate their bigoted rhetoric. They don’t get to write op-eds in the New York Times titled “Why can’t we hate women”.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 06:11 AM
1

Ah super symmetrical gender theory.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:58 AM
4

Just add a head back in, now he’s playing soccer. There sure are a lot of human skulls in that fresco.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:49 AM
2

This reads like satire. Are you joking? If not, why in the name of god, do women need to be virgins? I mean, that made me laugh. Are you a vampire or a mormon or something?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:43 AM
11

In fact it’s men who fought and died to overthrow feudalism and establish democracy. You’re welcome, ladies!
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:38 AM
51

In her analogy men are adults and women are children? Men have responsibility and women don’t? She sounds like a misogynist.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:34 AM
3

Conflating blame with advice is a major component of this whole clusterfuck. Police advising people to watch their valuables is not tacit support of theft on the part of the cops, nor is it blaming victims of crime for that crime. Its like there’s this deliberate attempt to remove nuance so that people can be sanctimonious jerks and not get called on it. My current theory is that with the thankfully diminished authority of the church, ordinary citizens are taking it on themselves to be the kind …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/18 05:51 PM
3

#teachwomennottorape
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:07 PM
3

Burglars shouldn't burgle. So yeah, I shouldn't have to lock my doors at night. Teach men not to steal. That's the friggen mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/18 02:54 PM
3

Great. Should we apply that to newbie female engineers designing bridges? Or just let them off and see what happens?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:28 AM
1

the punsihment? 1 year suspension. No dismissal. No taking away her tenure. She's even probably being paid.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 11:17 AM
1

Yiu have to know the magic words. Been there.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 11:02 PM
1

The idea here is give up all your wealth, give up any job that generates income. So you wont have any assets or career. Can’t see much room for maneuver with age alone
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:53 PM
15

Supended for one year. Is that WITH pay? Did this woman just get 1 years paid vacation? I wouldn't be surprised if she did.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:21 AM
12

The good old gals network letter saying she can’t be guilty because she’s a good writer is chilling. These people are literally insane.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:00 AM
1

If you get married, insist on being the PRIMARY CARER. Otherwise no kids.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:43 AM
2

Where are you going to live? What are you going to eat?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:42 AM
1

Imagine if cigarettes gave you cancer at the same rate divorce rape happens? They wouldn’t be legal.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:40 AM
6

You can’t outlaw ideas or fields of study without the law of unintended consequences taking a massive dump in your cornflakes.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:34 AM
4

Plenty of MRA’s hate that orange ape. Im not a communist but I am a proud new deal Liberal. Policies which enhance the social compact make for a better, stronger nation. Trump is incompetent, naive, corrupt and narcissistic. He’s a terrible leader. On the other hand The extremists in the Democratic party who have succumbed to the social justice ideology of equality of outcome are dangerous zealots. There’s nothing remotely LIBERAL about those people.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:30 AM
1

Dad gets served dinner? what is this, the 1950's?m lol. If you're getting served dinner you're in the minority. Todays gals can't cook and won't cook. Or do much housework really, now that I think of it.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:40 PM
1

Jesus what's the perentage of teachers that rape students at this point?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:41 AM
4

As long as you don't grab someone or proposition them, you can take someone to lunch...It is completely obvious how to be professional Its also completely obvious that in an environment where any female accusation must be believed 100% without any evidence that this is a fertile environment for casual blackmail.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:39 AM
1

here here.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:36 AM
2

Polygon makes Jezebel look like an august and well reasoned publication.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:20 AM
26

One of the comments: "This is really dumb. Sounds like he’s either totally sexist and just looking to cover it up, or actually does cheat on his wife a lot and doesn’t want any light shone in that direction." Thus proving the man's point. FFS.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:15 AM
1

Reminds me of Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLMC) in Rwanda. At some point Vice are going to start telling people to grab machetes.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 09:41 AM
1

Thats my take too
/r/MensRights12/08/18 09:39 AM
2

Sure tradcons have a rich vein of assholes and hypocrites running through them, but it’s not like these assholes cancel each other out. They’re not like electrical charges or anything.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:28 PM
1

Well it also ensures that more people have mates.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:02 PM
2

Its totally normal.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:00 PM
2

Accusing people who want to save sex for marriage of suffering from a mental pathology is vicious No it isn't. In a culture where promiscuity is seen as normal, healthy and fun by the vast majority of rational people - someone who deliberately avoids these things for some imagined gain - chiefly touted by religious authorities who themselves have either a limited or pathological or no experience in this field is by definition an outlier socially and therefore more likely to be socially maladapte…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:36 PM
2

I urge you to revisit this comment in a few years.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:18 PM
2

"but girls don't really have to do that much." OMG are you fucking with me? If not, then know that women can do a lot more than just laying there. And if she's just laying there I doubt she's having a really great time!
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:58 PM
1

I have, so nyeah to you. It's an elaboration of ideas in Crome Yellow. While we're on the topic, I don't know if you've read Huxley's other work, but Point Counterpoint is the standout for me. Its almost fractal complexity along with ingenious satire and generous tips for aspiring writers make it the definitive Huxley.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:41 PM
2

I think that having their input during the trial would be useful I agree with that.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:33 PM
1

Lumping the two together as examples of pejorative traits seems like a mistake. I don't get why sexual modesty is a good or rational characteristic. Experience is useful in just about every category of life skill. Being uninhibited, imaginative, playful and alert to your partners sexual needs is a skill. Do you prefer a 'modest' partner in bed? I don't.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:32 PM
5

to be fair some assholes are created and some are born. Feminism is creating a LOT of assholes.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:26 PM
2

I don't really have any use for a sick husband yeah I got the same treatment. *I* have to look after *you*???? forget it!
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:25 PM
2

How sane is a marital-aged virgin going to be anyway? man or woman.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:23 PM
2

See I'm not a big fan of debt, but in my experience a woman with a lot of sexual experience is a decided advantage in the sack, freaky tats or not.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:22 PM
3

For intiutional feminists the nuclear family is an institution of female slavery and their ultimate goal is the 'freedom' of women through the abolition of marriage.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:21 PM
11

Soviet political officers in other words.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 12:08 PM
3

It is not a strawman argument as I am not intentionally misrepresenting your argument with a proposition. A strawman argument might go like this: "You think all kids should be allowed do anything they want without any adult oversight". Note that this is an assertion, not a question. It would be a strawman argument because I am basically putting words in your mouth. In asking the question about alcohol I am drawing your attention to the issue of where we draw the line with allowing children to en…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:47 AM
1

The kid was wearing it or she was?
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:33 AM
2

Or replace female with white or Aryan. Or "WHITE, FEMALE AND MIDDLECLASS" which is what they actually mean. These people are dangerous bigots.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:32 AM
1

I would have knocked his jaw out of alignment. Different strokes for different folks I guess.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:29 AM
3

Look up 'strawman' in a dictionary - you obviously don't understand the term. Look up 'analogy' while you're there.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:28 AM
2

it is related. ALso you ignored alcohol. Also related.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:25 AM
4

WHen people talk abiut the health benefits of slicing off part of their anatomy, I often wonder why not do that with ears? I mean they just get dirty - you get ear infections. Hats dont fit as well. Just cut the ears off your kids while you've got the knives out.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:49 PM
3

My teenage niece is quite mature. Should I give her vodka?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:39 PM
3

not when they are too young to know better. Should we give kids heroin beause "its nice"? I'm sure after feeling the effects, kids on heroin would demand more heroin. Same goes for alcohol and sex.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:38 PM
2

I hope the punitive damages are gigantic.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:36 PM
1

I personally would be seeking ‘a hole for a role’ were I in his position, because I’m not a depraved scumbag.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 01:27 PM
12

Well also, I mean people were piling on Weinstein and why not get a few kicks in while he’s on the way to the floor? That Fucker deserves everything he gets. The whole casting couch thing is sleazy and fucked up. So is applying it to all men of course.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 06:56 AM
2

Same here. I've started just patiently explaining to her, in detail - where and when this is happening. And how it would not be acceptable the other way around. At first she was angry - then confused - then it dawned on her that she was being a shithead a lot of the time, but as her conception of men was some sort of giant beast with thick hides that were basically invulnerable, she deemed it unimportant. In other words she deemed her abusive behaviour as probably below my radar, so she would am…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:14 AM
2

Jesus you two - it's obviously both.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:00 AM
2

Clementine Ford is clearly a sociopath.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 08:56 AM
3

The very few guys at very top are men. They guys at the very top don't have problems. Therefore billions of men at the bottom don't have problems. See? It's all very logical.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 08:55 AM
2

But all things are never equal at the personal level which is why its asinine and racist to hold the position that a lady like Sarah Jeong is incapable of racism no matter how many racist things she says and does personally. Holding a woman with an ethnic background that is non white to a lower standard of conduct? Textbook racism.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 12:05 AM
0

It is. They're all the same. Stupid, egotistical, hypocritical, sanctimonious clowns.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:27 PM
6

Its bigoty anyway. Any bigotry is "kind of sick".
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:55 PM
1

The menslib sub is foolish. About as foolish as TRP.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:58 PM
1

She mentions ‘the monstrous DUP’ but fails to mention their leader is a woman.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:53 PM
1

And the Home Secretary, and the chief of the London Metropolitan Police. And the head of the DUP.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:49 PM
11

No that was the other one, (who wrote about how she hated all men, individually and wanted to see ‘the class broken’ and then wrote about how ‘online hate’ needs to be tackled), Suzanne Moore.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:20 PM
6

Tsk that Jordan Peterson, he thinks he’s so smart, with his fancy degrees and peer reviewed work and best selling books and clinical practice and adoring students.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:18 PM
2

Did it strike you how very similar their pronouncements sound to language from the third communist international? Do Feminists call each other comrade, yet?
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:08 PM
2

Hey some people pay good money for it... 😀
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:08 AM
7

Exactly. Try making a similar joke about “The Jews”. See who laughs. What epithet would characterize such people?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 09:09 AM
1

She also cloned her dog.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 09:06 AM
0

Or it might not be. Judging by their barbaric rhetoric against men I’m inclined to go with not
/r/MensRights22/07/18 09:02 AM
2

We don’t know how often males attempt suicide since they don’t report it.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:49 AM
2

Fuck sake. So does every professional sportsman. Hooters is fucking terrible btw.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:17 AM
6

There’s a lit of women out with bigoted, incorrect ideas about men. Some of them actually believe men are mentally inferior to women, are less human and do not have internal lives.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:16 AM
5

I’m pitching the term down to the reading level I think you guys will understand, friend. If you would prefer a technical digression into the modalities of political science, in place of a pugnacious riposte, then by all means, press on.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 09:41 PM
9

The ‘level the playing field’ argument is oft employed by bars and clubs who just want more girl meat as chum to attract male wallets to their places of business. As an egalitarian, is sickening to see them posture and act all ‘woke’ when in fact they are just slime. Feminism gives cover to the worst people. It’s an ideology like Communism that is coated in sugar and gold such that anyone invoking the term is automatically exempt from inquiry or examination. This is exactly how you get pedophile…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:23 PM
2

Weak post.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:13 PM
-1

Boom, headshot.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:12 PM
5

Ace. They also grow a great beard. The Norwegian men that is. But shit at killing aliens.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:11 PM
1

Read the Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Watch the Erin Prizzy doc on Youtube. Read Jordan Petersons book, Maps of Meaning. Just kidding, read the other one.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:09 PM
2

Feminism hasn't helped women in a very long time. Right now, it's denying them male partners, infantilising them and holding them back in business.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:37 PM
2

In addition they hold the majority of positions in the civil service and in education.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:37 PM
8

They care deeply about men and boys. They care about destroying men, and preventing boys from becoming successful men.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:36 PM
1

Agree, however when the laws start to tip in this direction, typically the cops often misunderstand them about as often as he general public. Ive been told by cops it’s ‘illegal’ to photograph them, for instance. I was once told by a law enforcement officer that it was illegal to photograph a particular municipal building because of ‘terrorism’! Policing in the UK is already overzealous when it comes to charging men for crimes based on nothing but hearsay, thanks to an ideologically misandrist p…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 10:04 AM
1

They are pathetic and they are shitheads. But in a world where they are now criminals as well, one will find there are other negative consequences of overzealous policing. And those negatives vastly outweigh the negatives of mere buffoonery.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:45 AM
1

These guys seem like weirdos.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:33 AM
1

Hmm. Feminist 1: Consent is simple, straightforward and clear! Consent is a simple yes and no. Feminist 2: Consent is fraught and nuanced and ambiguous. Consent isn’t a simple yes and no Either way it's the man who stands to lose his career, his livelihood should the mob descend. Women don't have to suffer the downside of this infinite variability in definitions of consent. Consent can be withdrawn at any time! Great. And once it's withdrawn, you are a rapist apparently. That's almost as bad as …
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:18 PM
1

Well currently in the UK for example, it's only rape if a penis goes into the wrong hole. So maybe not redundant at all. This law would make it possible for men to be raped by women, legally speaking.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:43 PM
75

Well, the diabetes might go down when they start offing themselves at the same rate as men due to work stress and the realization that money isn't everything.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:36 PM
1

Projection.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:57 PM
1

It is good. But I'm bewildered as to why the author is at a loss to explain why it's okay to "be mean about men". I mean it;'s simple: modern Feminism. Let's lay the blame where it belongs.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 11:59 AM
4

societal approval for being a married guy raising a family has steadily lost it's value Exactly this. It's got to the point where married men are belittled and looked down on, If they are a breadwinner they "don't contribute to the family". It's assumed they are all Madison Avenue execs, drinking whiskey and having affairs like its 1955. Somehow paying the mortgage on time, taking care of the bills, the house, long commutes and work stress all in the service of looking after the family are not c…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 11:42 AM
3

Our body, our choice? not in a million years.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 11:26 AM
2

The most important "field" is education. And that is totally dominated by women. The article is pretty good however, the author making the (obvious) point that women and men have different interests and that it's perfectly cool to not want to be a geologist.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:12 AM
3

Surely "not being silent" = "mansplaining" and "depriving women of their voices".
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:35 AM
3

His patients. He's a he. Some of the the worst misandrists are.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 09:18 AM
1

You’re right, sorry, tricked by the headline. God fucking damn Fox and every other snakeoil media bait and switching bastard.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 10:21 PM
1

Seriously, how old are you?
/r/MensRights29/06/18 10:05 PM
3

Every female Nurse in WW1 and WW2? Your stupid attitude is stupid. Women are not the enemy, nor are they 'trash' for christs's sake. Professional Feminists on the other hand, (and they come in male and female flavours), are part of a cult of misandry and undisguised communism.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:53 PM
0

This is just whataboutery. They are putting kids in fucking cages. The people who do this are worthless dogshit.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 11:25 AM
17

Suzanne Moore "hates men". "All of them". "individually". And she wants to "see this class broken". She is a Nazi. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2016/09/suzanne-moore-why-i-was-wrong-about-men
/r/MensRights29/06/18 11:17 AM
4

Well done Thomas. I hope it doesn't negatively affect your career. It's brave of you, for sure.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 11:11 AM
3

Fight back. Don't cower.. Some of use have mortgages to pay and young children to support.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 11:07 AM
1

Thank you. We can't bring these things up for fear of getting fired or worse.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 11:06 AM
4

Yes, absolutely.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 08:53 AM
7

Good luck with that. Any time men petition to have equality they are called 'misogynists' 'manbabies' etc. Even so called 'mens rights activists' are spoken about in the same breath as 'pick up artists', 'Incels', white supremacists and actual Nazis. There's no way most men are going to go anywhere near that unless they have little to lose. The social climate for men is so toxic and repressive that it's at the point where a guy like Donald Trump can win a fucking election. With so much anger ste…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 08:51 AM
1

Queue most criminal gangs employing women as couriers, burglars and a lot more blackmail.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 08:47 AM
5

Yeah I read the link. Essentially they are bribing the women to join. Wow. Equality.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 01:59 PM
1

I get you, carrots not sticks. Or if not carrots maybe just turnips.. er, However I feel this is unlikely to affect change. Women were badly mistreated in the latter half of the 20th Century and put their collective feet down in no uncertain terms. They were loud and proud. Of course the more militant were also seen as difficult, overly dramatic and possibly ‘crazy’, nevertheless the strategy was an effective one. I believe a similar zero tolerance strategy is required of men if we are to be tre…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:57 PM
2

Well its comedic inertia as I see it. Men used to run things, almost everything, back in the 70's 80's. This sort of humour was a punky way of rebelling against that shit. It's been a long time since men ruled the roost, so to speak, so it's just outdated now and to that extent is just pure misandry. You have to call people on it and have them apologise and admit that it's a shitty way to talk about people.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:59 PM
1

I imagine telling your female date that your ambition is to be a homemaker as you just LOVE kids, will not be taken as charitably were the genders to be flipped.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:57 PM
2

Did Pete Davidson just slyly reveal the radius of Ariana Grande's Vagina?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:52 PM
2

I agree. Theres some merit in being "first".
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:34 PM
1

All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to remain silent.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:34 PM
2

Exactly. People can be inept. That 70's crap with women being portrayed as airheads is as bad as the feminist shit today.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:14 PM
3

In other words, affirm that it IS in fact socially acceptable. I disagree. I think this is a poor strategy.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:11 PM
1

I make it a point to remind people that it is not socially acceptable when the segment of society within earshot contains myself. I make it firmly known that it's unacceptable and I ask for an apology. I make it clear that the alternative would be an escalation that they will find unpalatable. I will not put up with sexist / racist shit from anyone to anyone while I'm physically present and that includes towards others as well as myself. It just makes my blood fucking boil. 'Socially acceptable'…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:09 PM
34

"Straight up, I don't want to help them, and I shouldn't be guilted into fixing broken mens problems.". No Need for Men's rights. Feminism helps men too! These people are sick in the head.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 11:55 AM
1

This is from Domestic Violence Australia - a Facebook group. Can't link it, but nice graphic.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 11:40 AM
2

I never stated that the cause of their illegality was my opposition to them. Is english your first language?
/r/MensRights22/06/18 08:15 AM
1

Pedophiles are easy to spot!
/r/MensRights22/06/18 08:14 AM
5

Note the current number of men in the US (I assume you live in the US) is around 150 million. Note the number of men placed in the sex offenders register is around 600,000 (a quarter of the register are juveniles, 4 % are grown women. This number includes people arrested for public urination) This means roughly 1 in 250 men are likely registered 'sex offenders'. Some estimate the number of Pedophiles at 0.5% to 1% of population, including women. Pedophiles are also not noted for being burly, uns…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 04:26 PM
5

Yes, people do seem to be becoming exponentially stupider.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 04:00 PM
10

"combat training" Neither did Ellen Ripley. She just had common sense and iron will. She's a great hero character, because she's an everyman.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:59 PM
2

No, it isn't. :) Its a simple opinion though.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:57 PM
1

No, just guns.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:56 PM
3

Agree with all that except it's not okay to 'play' with guns. It's dangerous and where I live, - illegal. (something I emphatically agree with also). Nice T-shirt though!
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:55 PM
1

Silverback Gorillas eat plants only.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:33 PM
3

Great Essay. I predict the Author will be villified.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:18 PM
1

What can I do to help? Tell other women IRL how you feel. It's not possible for men to do so without losing their jobs potentially.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 10:47 AM
3

nobody is forcing you Except when somebody IS forcing you. Then what?
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:39 AM
8

Am somewhat happily married (10 years). Marriage gives men extra responsibilities. It confers no responsibilities on women. It grants Women supports and benefits. It grants men nothing. If and when a marriage dissolves it destroys men and benefits women financially. Marriage is the enslavement of men for the benefit of women. Once in, you just have to make the best of it. Do not get married. Or at least do not get married in this social climate where the social contract is so one sided in favour…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:48 AM
7

And for christs sake don't get the wine wrong. Read her non verbal cues, it's simple. A touch of the left ear means she will only drink a Riesling or Gruner Veltliner.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:18 AM
12

"This one is just for guys: When you go on dates, act as if every woman you're talking to is a reporter" Don't they already need to act as if every woman they are talking to can potentially destroy them with an accusation. Wouldn't that be a bit more daunting anyway? How long before we have male -only and female - only colleges?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:16 AM
4

Best comment on that article: One of the standard tests which psychologists use to detect sexism, is the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. You can see it here: http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/take The test is already incredibly loaded and biased towards feminist ideology. Essentially, if you have reservations about feminism the test classes you as a sexist and possibly even a misogynist (hostile sexist). Here are two questions from the test: (7) Feminists are not seeking for women to have m…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:15 PM
11

Yep thats all thats needed. That and do your schoolwork. The world needs more successful, sane women.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 07:26 AM
1

Voicing your support of men to other women is a big deal because men are not allowed. If men speak out about their issues, they are 'misogynists'. If they bottle it all up, they are embodiments of 'toxic masculinity'. Anyway good on you for being fair.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 01:58 PM
1

Hilarious article. Decries "toxic masculinity" and int he next breath criticises Peterson for showing emotion (over the death of a young man he knew). What a grade A prick of an author. Seems to be his M.O though all his articles are blatant misandry in an attempt to curry favour with feminists presumably. Its excerable stuff and sad that a once great paper like the Independent would publish it.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 01:45 PM
5

"Now rapists cannot get away with having sex with a person that is asleep or blacked out" THEY NEVER COULD FOR FUCK SAKE.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:28 AM
1

It's also the intended effect.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:27 AM
3

But do you say "what about now?' every time he thrusts? because he might have withdrawn consent between thrusts. You never know. These crazy laws say "consent can be withdrawn at any time" which is fine, but what's not fine is that it's RAPE the split second after consent is withdrawn - and not some lesser legal thing. You go from perfectly fine to 10-15 years in jail and permanent sex offender status in less than quarter of a second potentially. Someone with an axe to grind against the opposite…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:23 AM
5

This may well be made up. Any way to verify?
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:19 PM
1

Eliminate those variables why? Feminists would have us believe women are suffering under a tyranny of men. Its bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:14 PM
3

r/TheRedPill isn't banned from Reddit if that's what you meant.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:54 PM
4

Mostly its a projection issue. As Cassie says she heard something completely different than what is being said. Perhaps women are used to not saying what they mean - I know from my own experience with women they OFTEN mean something completely different from what they say and you're supposed to read their minds to discover what the 'true' meaning is.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:45 PM
3

k. I'll tell Queens Elizabeth through Victoria you said Hi. Nobody disputes those in charge of a lot of power structures were men. And are men. The dispute is, just because they're men doesn't automatically make all men more powerful than all women. Most violent deaths are men. Most suicides are men. Men get raped. By women. The absolute bottom of society is as dominated by men as the tippy top. More so, in fact. Secondly: viewing society only through the lens of power is short sighted. Men most…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:32 PM
1

Good on you. I wish you success. But please if you ever get the chance - try to pass on your perspective to other women. We men are forbidden from doing so by social orthodoxy.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:23 PM
1

Oh I mean directly. And literally.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:55 PM
1

Yes, its called martial law.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:25 AM
1

or informs government decision making. But they do inform government decision making. To a worrying degree.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:02 AM
1

Yeah movie rights sold to Cubby Broccoli. Its now owned by Barbara broccoli, his daughter.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 06:41 AM
1

Its a franchise owned and operated by one individual though, so reason might not be paramount in the decision, and I don’t mean because that individual happens to be s woman.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:01 PM
5

Yeah Ripley is a realistic badass female character - by which I mean she isnt a superpowerful ninja capable of unrealistic feats of strength or martial prowess which seems to be the default for every ‘strong female lead’ in an action movie. Instead she’s competent, brave and reasonable - which in real life actually is a rare set of skills that will see you through tough scrapes.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:58 PM
2

Yeah take him to court, the bastard - keeping YOUR money from you!
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:44 PM
3

Idris is too old to carry the franchise for a good number of years. That's the only reason why. Also because he likely wouldn't do it.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:10 PM
6

There's an idea that it will sell. George Lucas made a movie about an all black air corps squadron called Red Tails (it didn't do great). Before box office was known he was asked something along the lines of what if it makes a lot of money?" He answered "More films featuring an all black cast will be made". "What if it makes a billion George?" His answer: "All films will be black". There's no moral or social question here - simply a gamble of production money against a return. If it makes money …
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:07 PM
5

Aliens though.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:03 PM
14

'Action' films are stories that appeal to boys and young men largely. It makes as about much sense to gender swap the likes of Pride and Prejudice to my mind. I don't think you'd have hoards of men flocking to see that. The movies that make money depend on these tropes as they are because that's what audiences want. Cinema didn't begin in the 21st century.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:00 PM
1

Women are the target market- they dominate spending. Thus all advertising is aimed at women. Even razor ads.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 11:24 AM
2

Mens rights actually are what feminists only claim to be.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 11:16 AM
2

Explain it yourself, it’s real. How old are you?
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:11 PM
1

The temperence movement was born of the same urges and was mostly organised and supported by women. Same old story, sackcloth and ashes for our sins. Then, rejection and wild recalibration.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:40 PM
1

'sexual liberation' is responsible to a not inconsiderable degree for single parent (aka fatherless) families to a large degree. That hasn't helped anyone, but it's been particularly hard on Boys who are deprived of fathers and then see no male role models in education either.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:38 PM
1

Pretty good article. Particularly this segment: “Women have been taught, by every cultural force imaginable, that we must be ‘nice’ and ‘quiet’ and ‘polite,’ ” writes Rachel Simmons, a widely quoted expert on girls and young women. “That we must protect others’ feelings before our own. That we are there for others’ pleasure.” Speaking as the mother of two thirtysomething daughters and as a close observer of feminist social media, I feel confident in saying that this is unsorted rubbish. The patr…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:36 PM
2

I agree talent is nothing without hard work, but latent ability is there from birth. Ever see an old school animator draw? Yeah they put in the hours, but sweet Jesus that raw talent is on another plane entirely. It's like some native cognitive superpower. Likewise people who can just THROW a ball accurately. You see it with little kids, some of them are born athletes, some... are not. I've put in tens of thousands of hours on the violin for example. I'm okay. But I will never be Yehudi Menuhin …
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:04 PM
2

it's a kind of communism, not a kind of fascism.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 12:58 PM
12

It was a question, not an assertion. Questions are not “Wrong”.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 06:40 PM
36

The male MP was expelled based purely on allegations wasn't he - not the results of an investigation?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:01 PM
2

Part of the reason for lower payouts is women earning as much or more than men and men earning substantially less than in previous generations where one working man's salary could easily provide for the whole family.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:54 PM
5

One gender is not more dishonest than the other but the law and public opinion is overwhelmingly on one genders side. Rapists get away with it far too often, but a false accusation of rape can ruin a life too and a lot of young women are being given the message that sex is by default an illegal activity that is almost always borderline rape and men are by default, rapists who can’t help themselves.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:47 AM
2

So regret does equal rape?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:36 AM
2

Angela Merkel hasn't made Germany a paradise - although their economy is doing well. Margaret Thatcher is reviled as one of the worst, if not the worst leader Britain ever had. Teresa May has made an utter balls of Brexit. She's supported by the DUP, the leader of which is a bigot and incompetent to boot - Arlene Foster. The leader of Scotland is a woman. The head of the home department is Amber Rudd. The leader of the house of Lords is a woman. The chief police commissioner is a woman. So maybe…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:09 PM
2

To be fair: there's a sleazy strip club in GTA but the game doesn't promote violence towards women. WHat bothers me about GTA is not the game, which is aimed at a mature adult audience with a knowing cynicism and nihilist humour that would go way over the heads of younger players - its the fact that parents in their millions - mainly moms I'm guessing bought this for their kids without stopping for a second to consider if it was a good idea. My friend bought it for her boys and I tried to impres…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:00 PM
3

...and blackmail surely.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:46 PM
24

twitter username doesn't check out?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:07 PM
3

What was she angry about? the implied injustice towards men of the document?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:37 AM
11

I too, was a sinner, but now I have see the light! Can I get an Amen! AMEN! What a fucking circlejerk.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:34 AM
19

Damn right. She thinks it’s feminist comedy gold - in fact its antifeminist comedy gold.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:34 AM
7

Sadly while sarcasm, this is accidentally good advice for young men in college these days.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:33 AM
2

Women. The first nurses were women. The men fought, the women patched them up. Modern nursing was pioneered by women like Florence Nightingale, but the tradition goes back to Roman times. This ridiculous notion that women were excluded from everything, everywhere until tumblr was invented needs to be put to rest.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:59 AM
10

There is an orthodoxy of formal academic feminism - a vanguard of women in positions of power in various institutions, in education, in law, journalism, in government as well as in thinktanks and lobby groups for whom the more radical feminist views are the correct ones. This is why a writer like Suzanne Moore who writes for the prestigious international newspaper the Guardian can get away with putting in print things like this: "As a class, I hate men. I’ve changed my mind. I am no longer reaso…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:03 PM
3

This is the best way to get anyone into anything surely. The first male nurses had to find it way more intimidating than a man applying to a nurse these days.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:27 PM
10

A minority - right. Here's the problem with that. I say "The catholic church is awful". "Why?" you might ask. "Don't they just believe in loving thy neighbour and turning the other cheek? Why would you be against such decent, noble things?". So I explain about how they view gay people and women. I explain the child sex abuse and the cover up. "ah but that's a tiny minority" you might counter. "The Catholic church mostly does good. ". But you see, it's the tiny minority, who are in charge.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:20 PM
4

huh, sounds like discrimination to me! Cisgenders don't have to go through this process. Obvious case of patriarchical opression. Scramble the lawyers
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:15 PM
8

The punishment must be eternal I guess.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 11:08 PM
2

No choice really. But We’ve worked things out to a point where I’m satisfied - so the no choice is moot - but its still oppressive to be a second class citizen in that crucial respect. Oppressive and morally wrong.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:12 PM
0

Mate, you can’t do hard labour or be exposed to the elements in a spacesuit. It wouldn’t be anything like pioneering. And even if it were, again a healthy physique is going to be more useful than just burly strength. Do you expect them to be felling trees or something? Also women did go ahead and populate the americas. Women were pioneers. Kids, too.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:07 PM
8

oh come on - she just hates men as a social class. Pft. You know. The way the KKK hate black people or the way white supremacists hate Jews. Don't, like, get all OFFENDED, man. Jeeze some people are so sensitive about class hatred towards billions of people.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:06 PM
1

It's also a proper noun now.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:51 PM
1

Woah wait - I think this is a stupid remark by the engineer, but there's been plenty of well qualified female astronauts in space. It's just that they WERE the best candidates, nothing to do with their gender. Astronauts do NOT need incredible physique. They just need to be healthy. A paper in Social Science and Medicine said that an analysis of the General Household Survey showed no differences between men and women in reporting ill-health. More important are ability to work under pressure, goo…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:50 PM
3

I agree. Send the women to Mars. But should it be a black women or a white woman or Asian or Catholic or a Wiccan? Or wait should we really be sending MORE cisgendered people into space? It's full of them! Also What about Jews? No Jewstronauts got to the moon either. The next person on mars MUST be Jewish. Or 'Latino'? which is the most deserving 'race?' they can't be white obviously. Or straight. Too many breeders. So many burning mission-appropriate questions. Thank goodness things like missio…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:39 PM
2

It treats rape as a joke It assumes the default for men is to rape and they have to try very hard all day long to remember that it is a crime It assumes most or all men are rapists It assumes that the way to deal with rape is education and that rapists are not a collection of sick individuals It assumes women are never rapists It assumes men are never raped The graphic design uses a trite communist trope and lackluster layout.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:33 PM
0

You should have just written "rape jokes are hilarious now?" on it.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:28 PM
1

Just tie a knot in your hankerchief. That way you will remember.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:27 PM
1

The approach here could be spreading hate and mistrust jokingly. No? Sure, no topic is funnier than Rape. But here was I thinking it was men who were making all the rape jokes all day long according to feminists. All we do is sit around raping and making jokes about rape and then raping some more. I guess its so hilarious and amusing they just have to get in on the hilarity.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:26 PM
1

Yes, haha, it's a funny joke - because as we all know, rape is an amusing topic - not to be taken seriously! WHATHEFUCK
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:21 PM
1

Because rape is simply caused by bumbling absent mindedness! It's trivial, a laugh, a mere peccadillo. This is the disturbing message I get from this poster. I thought rape hysterics were against "rape jokes". This poster IS rape jokes.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:20 PM
7

Having my wife cheat on me and realize that a divorce would destroy me while leaving her with the kids, a nice house and an indentured servant. You turn around and realize you were in a Bear trap this whole time. Then of course there’s the tens of thousands of articles titled “the problem with men is...” I did some reading on academic feminism and realized that it is the planned, co-ordinated destruction of men as a class and that it has been going rather well for them thus far. The goal is a co…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:18 PM
2

Jesus thats some action. No wonder people jump on the ‘sexism’ bandwagon with such enthusiasm.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:07 PM
3

Who is Laci green?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 01:19 PM
3

...or when they start with the building pyramids of human skulls and run out of people...
/r/MensRights16/04/18 01:18 PM
1

The judge is often not a “he”. Nor are the lawyers. That majority is getting slimmer all the time too. But yes The Judges and cops do bend over backwards for women. Used to be out of chivalry. Now Ill bet theres an element of fear too.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:51 AM
1

Police yes, legal system, no.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:58 PM
1

Formal academic Feminism is a jihad against men. It espouses the destruction of the nuclear family and advocates taking over the civil service and educational institutions to do so.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 02:05 PM
2

To be more exact, they care only about advancing FEMINISTS. They could really give a fuck about the rest of the (i.e. most) women.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 02:02 PM
2

Like all cults and religions, the stated and official policies belie the actions and beliefs of the most ardent practitioners. Try getting a fundamentalist Christian to “love thy neighbour, or fundamentalist Muslim to respect the “people of the book”. All these groupthink frameworks have their pathological side. It’s only when they take over from the state that they become seriously dangerous. Right now feminists are already well entrenched in institutional power. Be wary when they start to seek…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 02:00 PM
1

Feminism is about “equality” just like the democratic people’s republic of Korea is “democratic” and a “republic.” Feminism is a Jihad against men. Period.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:35 PM
1

Its called the seven year itch...
/r/MensRights15/04/18 11:21 AM
1

Infuriating article. Women are more complex sexually! No, no, you’re not. “After all, nearly as many women are initiating affairs as men” MORE women have affairs than men. Vastly more. Why? Because theres no repercussions for them. Divorce DESTROYS men. Its a lottery win for women.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 11:16 AM
1

Near as I can make out he failed to be a time traveling mind reader.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:51 AM
9

Exactly of course they do. They get just as nasty and disrespectful and pornographic.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 08:57 AM
1

Not exactly, but yes, very similarly in a lot of cases. (It’s tit for that. Particularly the last govt. shutdown) Trump has enemies among the Republicans too. But that’s because he is a loose canon. It’s not opposition to his ideology, the man has no ideology or consistency. It’s opposition to him being (a) an outsider and politically naiive and (b) the danger of his unthinking twitter outbursts and foolish personal behaviour
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:20 AM
1

Yes indeed.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:11 AM
2

Correct. Once you get to interview stage its er, more obvious which are male and which are female candidates. But it would follow that presented with more make candidates, the effect would be to statistically decrease a woman’s chances of getting the job all else being equal.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 05:19 PM
3

I interview candidates for positions quite frequently. One thing I've noticed is that the men tend to engage with you a lot after being told, sorry - the job went to someone else. I find it annoying but there you go.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 10:44 AM
13

Blind recruiting reduces diversity. In a bid to eliminate sexism, thousands of Australian public servants have been told to pick recruits who have had all mention of their gender and ethnic background stripped from their CVs. The assumption behind the trial is that management will hire more women when they can only consider the professional merits of candidates. Their choices have been monitored by behavioural economists in the Prime Minister's department — colloquially known as "the nudge unit"…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 10:42 AM
11

Another Fortnite widow wrote: "Where is the attention we deserve?" Lol.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 10:33 AM
1

Reactionary does have a meaning. I mean it in the sense that during the last administration Republicans seemed to pursue an "anti-Obama" agenda regardless of their own political, social or economic standpoints as simply an electoral strategy. The is "reactionary" in the literal sense that they simply reacted to whatever Obama did and were automatically against it. I can see the logic of the strategy coming off the electorally disastrous Bush second term, however it was hardly patriotic or even c…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:29 AM
1

From where Im standing the parties’ economic policies differ only in minor detail and presentation. They both would be viewed as right wing as compared with a centrist European party like the German Christian Democrats for example, so these ‘right’ and ‘left’ terms are relative. The Republicans’ rhetoric since Bush doesn’t seem like a coherent political philosophy but simply reactionary propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 06:19 AM
6

Thats because you have all the money
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:03 PM
9

Women control most of the money. Almost all consumer spending is done by women. Unscrupulous retailers are simply trying to take advantage of that. It's a bone-fide ripoff. But it's not 'the patriarchy' it's simply capitalism. Women have most of the money
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:00 PM
6

It will be interesting to see the reactions and debate. It's for equality after all.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 03:56 PM
17

"when in reality not even this asshole thinks that. " That's the subtext of her tweet though. It's right there for everyone to see. She's so worried about her pet SJW peeves that she literally cannot see how sociopathic the tweet looks. I agree The OP's headline is a bit clickbaity but this incredible solipsism that pseudofeminists display IS a problem. It's at the root of many problems men face when it comes to society denying the humanity of men.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 03:52 PM
1

Normally true - however her comment is so egregious in this instance I don't think that tactic will work.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 03:45 PM
9

It might give some scale to the opposition to this kind of Sturmabteilung mindset pseudofeminists think is acceptable to display in public. If you tolerate this, then your children will be next.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 01:55 PM
1

Do people even know what "rightwing" and leftwing" mean? For Americans they are often synonymous with the Republican and Democratic parties, but this is a terrible misnomer as both parties are in fact, 'rightwing'. The origins of the terms come from seating arrangements in the French parliament following the revolution. Those on the right were more supportive of arrangements made during the old monarchy; tradition, heirarchy and nascent capitalism. Those on the left advocated socialism, communis…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 10:27 AM
1

People are all caught up on the 'teabagging'. This person intentionally teamkilled! Losing your livelyhood is a proportionate response /s Of course it's fascinating to see the total lack of remorse or humanity in the feminist 'journalist'. For them a proportionate response to virtual horseplay is actual loss of career. Got kids to feed? a mortgage? too bad, no punishment is too severe. These people are fucking thugs.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:10 AM
3

Well that's some good news for a change. But one thing stands out for me here: "the males and females live in different areas" Different areas of the country? Are men and women segregated somehow? is it an urban / rural divide?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:58 AM
9

Its a tactic used by the state of Israel to deflect legitimate criticism of their policies. Don't support us? you're an antisemite. Jewish? you're a self-hating Jew. It works very well.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:50 AM
3

but initially people though they sounded bad Initially?
/r/MensRights05/04/18 10:21 AM
4

Hey, they’re being discriminatory because of your sex. If only there was a shorter way to put that...
/r/MensRights01/04/18 06:15 AM
1

Its a Belfast trial - these men are 'British' no? Did they play for the Republic of Ireland?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 08:49 AM
1

Its bad conduct in any sense. The text messages that came out were apalling. There's a huge element of national pride in Rugby - these guys acted quite disgracefully. But there should never have been a trial and the people tweeting stuff should be treated the way all twitters should be - ignore them.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 08:49 AM
1

For sure. I would point out to you guys though that the STRATEGY FOR THE LIBERATION OF WOMEN which second wave feminism embarked on was the destruction of marriage. Looks like the Op was a success...
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:09 PM
3

Yeah those lady-whine rags don’t have editors, or if they do, they exist merely to heap effuse praise on these fools.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:54 PM
4

Jesus christ that was like satire. I mean: “Yes, if you want the pleasure of my company, I expect you to plan a date. It doesn’t have to be fancy but at least come up with something! The level of laziness among single men is appalling. No wonder none of them have girlfriends.” Single men are lazy because THEY wont plan the date SHE wants. Plan one yourself? Nope! They don’t have girlfriends says the woman with no boyfriend... lol.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:30 PM
9

I've had to do it a few times. Screaming daughter, refuses to stand in the mall, so I have to fireman lift her back to the car. I get looks, but no-one tries to interfere. Maybe they should sometimes? I dunno.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:35 PM
15

I think it's simply there is a 'culture' of this now. Remember when it was called "going postal" because it was all postal workers? Same thing. Hopefully it dies out.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:31 PM
2

"J.M. Barrie talks about how women in Europe at the time had hots and were wet for Napoleon who was the big boy thug emperor of his time" Napoleon was no thug. He got bad press from the British - that's their MO. Truth is he beat the pants off them. He ended the violent shit going on in France after the Revolution and did more to introduce the rule of law in Europe than any other historical figure. His enemies called him a tyrant, but he was far less tyrannical than any of the Tzars, Kings and Q…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/18 04:31 PM
2

Don't create another portMANteau.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:16 PM
8

look at the SIZE of that thing!
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:05 PM
4

These 'women's marche's are starting to look a lot like Klan rallies to me.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:49 PM
6

Amazing article. Important to point people towards this when they go around telling people 1 in 4 women are ‘victims of rape’
/r/MensRights04/03/18 09:38 AM
2

I cant hate trump, he’s the first public servant I’ve encountered who is LITERALLY beneath my contempt.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:08 PM
3

Thanks, Stalin
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:50 PM
6

The very best cleaners and decorators are also men
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:05 PM
18

The laughter of men is terrible to hear.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:53 PM
1

Mirror to me, she had one (that I know of) I didnt because We promised each other never to be “those people”. What games were you into? MMO’s or lighter fare? 0-2 was hardest for her. Breastfeeding is beyond any endurance I can think reasonably possible for most non astronaut humans. Its intense.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:43 PM
1

Edit: took out stuff about affairs. Video game playing: I did this. It was an alternative to ‘going out’. I actually thought it was self sacrificing and I was being a mensch, since I trading going out and seeing my friends for a poorer substitute. Men and women see gaming vastly differently. For me it was a social release. For her: I was isolating myself. Hah! It was the exact opposite. Ishould have just gone out! Im pretty bitter seeing as I played by all the rules and I STILL get my house and …
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:39 PM
2

Sorry to hear that. This is how most married men who work are treated. The work they do, the commuting And self sacrifice are considered not contributing to the family” as if we spend the whole day at a health spa or something. Did he prepare a meal for you when you got home? I didnt even get that, I had to do the cooking too, and most of the serious cleaning. She had a cant cook/ wont cook mentality because what, she should be in the kitchen all the time? A fair division of labour is all I ask,…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:16 AM
-18

Goodish post. The men sending dick pics are trolls though. There may be a component of sexual satisfaction. But the majority of the payoff is simply the tiny satisfaction of misanthropic schadenfreude. And sure, humans deserve whatever humans get, but I would’nt connect that with the desexualisation of men. Men are considered to be hypersexual in American society. Explicitly sexualizing men is like having to say that lions make poor vegetarians. Kinda? Although I empathise with the OP’s point. A…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 07:43 PM
-11

Its fine. So was Prometheus. You people don’t like movies. If you want to watch quality cinema maybe popular American children’s films are not the place to start.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 07:21 PM
2

Thats a load of crap. If a man is attractive or wealthy, women take the lead in initiating sexual relations.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 06:53 PM
5

Male sports stars are often besieged by admiring female fans who do their best to get them into bed. professional male athletes’ wives often complain of this. Same with male musicians and their partners. Sure, the men should remain true to their wives. But it be a lot easier if for instance (in one report I read) women didnt take their hands and stick them up in their crotches. And these days be in a pretty good position to cry foul if they dont get their way.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 06:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter