TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rustjelqing2 Archive

View 1 post and 130 comments by rustjelqing2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Social Issuesrustjelqing2/r/MensRights25/08/21 09:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Some do that. The reason men do the sperm donation thing is because of the anonymity it affords them while at the same time being able to procreate. Some achieve the same by just having sex without disclosing who they really are.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 10:05 PM
1

Oh I think you are confused. What I'm suggesting is that any US man would be wise to expatriate and renounce his US citizenship in order to seek citizenship in the country he expatriates to. That so as to not be under US jurisdiction but rather whatever else he chose. It would also be a wrong frame of mind to suggest you "contribute to their community" because there would be no your and their. Only your (which is not in the US anymore).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 09:32 PM
2

I can't see how your response makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 09:20 PM
2

I don't think wanting to leave the US for better prospects is necessarily due to a wish for sex tourism. The US has pretty draconian laws when it comes to child support and marriage. I'd think men looking for marriage and who want to have kids would be better served as citizens elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 09:08 PM
3

The US has draconian child support and marriage laws. Really, the legal system there leaves a lot to be desired in general. Changing citizenship isn't that costly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 08:57 PM
1

We're not immortal, thus the only way to "extend" your lifespan is to have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 06:17 PM
5

Some do, some don't. The reason for sperm donation is mostly due to how anonymity protects men from the women. They can't be held financially responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 05:58 PM
14

I doubt it's child support in and of itself that's the problem, but how child support is calculated in the US. In most countries child support isn't calculated based on the income of the (paying) parent, but of the costs of raising a child. This leads me to believe that men don't actually care about preventing pregnancy, they only care about dodging the consequences of pregnancy. This is a slightly interesting statement. I've seen it proposed that the right of abortion doesn't entail termination…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 05:50 PM
1

That it's in women's hands is an overly simplistic explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 05:08 PM
0

I suspect the men who suggest they can't be alone have low testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 04:37 PM
0

Well women with baby rabies sightings vastly outnumber ufo sightings and we hardly need the occurence to be confirmed or studied by the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 04:28 PM
2

Sure, it would mean survival. This is only in the first generation anyway. Women who grew up with the wall would simply think of it as part of their masturbation aid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 04:23 PM
-2

More likely to find a woman with baby rabies than any ufos with little green men in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 04:20 PM
1

They all get the baby rabies, but don't manage to get it done like they used to. With the wall it's easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 04:14 PM
3

Those who wouldn't would simply die out. It's like if you were on an only fat women island. If you didn't fuck them all that would happen is that you would die out alongside your values.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 04:00 PM
0

Didn't you see another comment of mine? We can solve that with some kind of communist ongoing ballsack-swapping process for all men. To use the vernacular of le reddit with Chads and whatnot. We redistribute Chad ballsacks (and all others) randomly. If you just go fuck a Chad, odds are you might just get knocked up with a hobo's kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 03:54 PM
3

I doubt it, women love having babies. If that's the only way they'll do it. Over time they wouldn't have the concept of men or anything that usually causes all of their inhibitions towards the penis. The wall will simply be a place of love and good feelings to them. Like maybe elder women would tell stories that "before the wall, there was the inert rubber penis" and how everything is better now.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 02:50 PM
16

Something like the Berlin wall but full of glory holes. Then we put men on one side and women on the other side.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 02:24 PM
1

Oh yeah there are many rapes involving astral projection. Police: This is 911 please state your emergency! Hippie feminist lady: There's a man in his home thinking about having sex with me. He's astral projected here now and I can see his erect penis! Please come, this salt I've poured in a ring around my bed will only last so long!
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 12:37 PM
0

Pretty soon society will be so unwelcoming that men will have to become anonymous, much like on reddit, to participate in a healthy way. Like maybe even throw on some kind of Harry Potter invisibility cloaks so they can avoid rousing the attention of women who want to take out their grievances on men. At the same time men must tolerate basically anything women do without exception, especially wearing almost no clothes even in the office. For that men will have to wear augmented reality contact l…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 10:48 AM
1

Stupid men can still be put to some use. Stupid women are like weak and stupid men. Less useful. However a stupid and weak woman can still be a vessel for something great through pregnancy. A stupid and weak man is just some workplace hazard waiting to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 10:36 AM
10

You should keep social interactions with women on a leash at the workplace.
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/21 11:41 PM
1

I don't think so. It simply makes a lot of sense that it was a woman who originally expressed these kinds of feelings. They are distinctly (toxically) feminine. It is no surprise to me that when such an unhealthy mindset is grows in men it will also be quite volatile as the male mind has not adapted for feminine mental issues.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 08:57 PM
9

I held her down, pulled the pants off and applied the hotsauce. Not as simple as there was quite the ruckus, explaining why some ended up in my eyes. Worked fairly well as it made her empathize with how ballsack attacks feel.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:07 PM
4

I would think It's a play on how certain western societies are scared shitless of criticizing women and Islam. It's not the literal "Islam says women are beneath men, and Islam is right" type of interpretation. By saying "you know what, Islam is right about women" you are attempting to create a deadlocked situation by some infuriating suggestion that ultimately westerners can't respond to without criticizing Islam. Like: Look at this wanton woman who is cheating on her husband with glee and no r…
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/21 03:35 PM
3

It might be true that you're not. For most people a relationship involves giving and making an effort when you would really rather not, because you are doing something for the other person's care, joy or needs. This is work. That someone says there's no work is either a play on semantics or they do indeed not do any work and are freeloading by receiving and never giving.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 03:20 PM
3

Relationships are work if you're with the wrong person. They are borderline effortless if you are with the right one. Source: freeloader ftfy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 03:11 PM
7

Take a step back. Look at the progenitor of the whole thing, a woman. It's a self-centered and toxicly feminine kind of victim mentality that is grabbing hold of men susceptible to viewing the world through the lens of victimhood and unfairness. I would think it is a result of men becoming increasingly suceptible to typically feminine ills, which are typically mired in an over-exaggerated preoccupation with self-image, as a result of having much lower testosterone overall than most men 50 years …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 01:54 PM
17

Ah, back when we were kids. My sister did this. As payback I hotsauced her pussy. It was habenaro and since it got everywhere including all over and in her pussy and in my eyes. We both cried, but fuck if I didn't laugh while I did. A kick in the balls from your sister is a free pass to hotsauce her pussy.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:31 PM
8

Relationships are really not hard. They are simply work. Most people do not want to work. It became work, not fun. Or more work than fun. Is often said as a reason for one ending. People are lazy, yet daydream about the results of even light work.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 10:39 AM
4

Would make sense. Some of these men seem pretty upset with some obsessive idea that they are going to have to wife up some woman who has been on the so-called cock carousel and that maybe even afterwards that regular sex with their wife, if it occurs at all, is going to involve being exposed to other men's fluids through her cheating. Seems weird to think all that and not just opt out of the wife part. Instead the autist-like man probably just has a bullet list of things he must do that just can…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 09:47 AM
-6

I think she has a point. It makes sense. If one is stuck with the child and its costs, it would be more fair if both were. Child support doesn't start coming in immediately, but the tax the child incurs starts immediately.
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/21 08:12 PM
1

Well if he appreciates women's patience, surely he should overlook one stinker?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:59 PM
1

Interesting perspective. I think I would withold complete condemnation before I know whether or not he would offer such forgiveness or patience himself. Like what if she lets a loud one rip?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:50 PM
1

I much prefer a magician who doesn't bring out his penis in any case, but a magic wand. We can agree on that. I think I would if I were a woman too, but that is pure speculation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:45 PM
1

I thought you meant that a legit magician's magic wand might very well rouse less negative attention than a penis. Thanks for clearing up that that's not what you meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:41 PM
1

Some people's perceptions are so colored that they will not be able to peer into another mind. I think people are too quick to laugh at this person who considers what he doesn't understand as an obstacle course. I think they are just blind to their own biases or ineptitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:35 PM
0

I don't think you understand these things, but maybe you think you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:27 PM
-1

Reading emotions and understanding norms is just rote memorization. I think even most psycopaths can do it. It's kinda strange that autists can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:22 PM
-3

Any belief of understanding is self-delusion. A man can't understand women. He can't understand other men. A man can truly only know and understand himself. It's a shame that there is a time and place of sex and that this time and place isn't always and everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:12 PM
2

Think about the alternative. It would be weird to treat the child as a stranger. I don't think women tell such lies, but after a while a man involved with such a woman would be weird if he wasn't kind to her children. I would find the opposite just as weird as well (i.e. this situation gender switched). Really it's like becoming friends with one person, who often hangs with another, only to exclude the other. I don't think anyone expects excessive involvement, but normal social bonding. It would…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 06:18 PM
2

I'd have picked photographic memory over hating men as the special ability autism gave me. I think rain man got better off there. I still hope you will find it useful somehow. I'd buy a "i hate men" squishy from you.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:11 PM
2

I think it's men who have watched too much porn. So they need to get off to watching "live porn" instead of actually having sex. I always liked playing soccer, not so much watching it. I just can't be bothered. Nowadays I still play sometimes, but watching is dull. I think maybe it's the same thing. Some people just love watching soccer, but rarely played it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 06:33 PM
3

Yeah having a swollen prostate and balls will make you a "real man" in no time. There's something to be said for porn though. Just naked women is probably fine, but watching say some man pound a woman is probably not good. After all you're priming your mind to enjoy that. So when the time comes you'd rather watch that, probably how /r/hotwife came into existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 10:07 PM
9

That's a fairy tale that ends up hurting a lot of men. They get divorced or cheated on, thought it was till death do us part and then they jump off a bridge. This question is like asking do you believe in the lottery? Sure you can point at how some people do win the first prize, but most just end up with less money.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:29 PM
7

Dating isn't more difficult it just involves a lot of jumping through hoops instead of just saying listen lady I want to blow my load balls deep in you. Being blunt is considered offensive, even if that's what end up happening anyway. Like, why did I have to waste so much time for this outcome?
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:21 PM
0

Probably the only medicine here is to just stomach the hate, put on some charms and push through. Making sure to ask for consent and then blow your load balls deep, hoping that if it takes, it will be a boy. At least that feminist will end up having a stake in boys. Maybe as a mother over time she will become more mellow to men.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 08:29 PM
3

I'd much prefer blowing my load balls deep in a feminist than to argue. Extending an olive branch here. I doubt it will work out though.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 08:08 PM
6

They use Goebbels type tactics to unilaterally color MGTOW as what their pointed out examples show. Most MGTOW you will never meet, they left. They were never busy writing out various screeds on the internet, because that is not what one does in a happy life. If asked about their life choices they probably simply answer I found my happiness like this. Now I'm not worried anymore. Like electing to drive with your seatbelts on and in a good safe car with airbags. They don't need to live a little b…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 06:07 PM
7

I suspect she was borderline or something. A lot of good men end up thinking that a woman's erratic behavior is normal. It's just their hormones or whatever. As a result of this normalization a lot of things are brushed aside. Incidents like these are then the road where that ends. That stands in contrast to a man who just beats up his wife. Everyone knows that's not right. Nobody would say "well, he's just like that sometimes, men do that, it will pass".
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 10:50 AM
3

Is it possible to fetch the legal documents for this case? Is it publicly available? Seems ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 09:37 AM
-13

By taking care of yourself and staying sane.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 10:29 PM
24

Seems a bit weird to be marrying and then go ahead and do that to be honest, either way.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 10:11 PM
6

There's a slight irony of feminists harping about gender neutral language under the moniker of feminist. Maybe consider this.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 07:09 PM
1

This stuff suggests that rape with a female victim and rape with a male victim (which isn't legally called rape) is treated with the same severity All non-consensual sexual activity is dealt with by specific serious offences, including those that can be committed by a man or a woman. The sentences available are significant and reflect the seriousness of the offending. Sexual violence against men is treated just as seriously by the law and forcing a man to have penetrative sex, for example, (unde…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 05:39 PM
5

Most problems with relationships evaporate once you elect to not have them. Once you go beyond a friend you have sex with there tends to be too much baggage. Suggest that and you'll be Satan for sure. Maybe point out that all this complaining on the internet shows women aren't happy in relationships so you're really doing everyone a favor. Funny thing is once I started to live like that I've only ever seen women on their very best behavior. Turns out that if you can be treated like a comfortable…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 05:00 PM
34

I'll go shopping. Running low on milk.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 03:04 PM
3

I'm pretty skeptical. At least to me it dosn't make sense.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 02:17 PM
5

I'm saying in cases where there have been actual subjugation, you never tend to see "subjugation play". So that these women fetishise getting raped and so on seem to suggest it's mostly things from a vivid imagination or how they conceptualize men. I think I'll turn the matter on its head. The expectation that a man should play along in this thing is what's degrading. Seems like a way to exert power or control. It's downright silly, like making your partner wear a monkey costume or something, be…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 02:03 PM
3

That just seems to be interracial porn (mixed in with some racial stereotypes), I don't see the point.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 01:36 PM
4

Have you considered how weird it would be to see a white man and a black man who were friends go have fun in the yard playing "white master, black slave"? Like the black man goes "hey, Billy let's go out in the yard do that thing you know, just for a moment, c'mon man". Where the the black man just loves to be chained up picking cotton while the white goes "ya better hurry up now boy! Or imma gonna have to give ya a paddlin' ". Notice that never happens, ever. Nor otherwise. In cases were actual…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 01:33 PM
1

If you want to have a place on reddit banned and feel like wasting your time doing so then you need only make sure to give such places bad press coverage and maybe tie them in with suspected criminal activities. Like if you know of some women likely to commit violent acts then send them a link to fds. After that if their computer and correspondence is admitted as evidence in a criminal case there would be a "woman arrested in stabbing case was had extensive online activity on REDDIT on female da…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 12:42 PM
1

Because it hasn't garnered any media attention and is mostly obscure. It could easily be banned with a narrative spun in the media that it is against feminism which is to say it is against equality between the sexes (obviously a selective interpretation where feminism has a monopoly on it as such). Here we have a bunch of men who want to control women and violate them in the most heinous of ways and reddit is turning a blind eye to this atrocity. Then find some examples of individuals who expres…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 12:25 PM
2

MGTOW in and of itself is basically choosing to live a confirmed bachelor lifestyle, informed by how it mitigates certain risks associated with marriage. That is pretty much unassailable. In order to attack the label it must be conflated with other things. Now it could be because certain men who use the label MGTOW have reprehensible opinions. It could also be that it is an effective way to limit the spread or awareness of how the bachelor lifestyle is a good choice. Of course those who don't wa…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 10:26 AM
1

First of all that was a very ridiculous situation that I have to say I find hard to believe really happened. Now say it did and I have seen the ridiculous occur before, so it's not that I'm blind to the possibility. The first thing one should do is go to a doctor and get an evaluation of whether or not it has rendered you infertile or in some way has damaged your fertility. After that go to the police to press battery and assault charges. It is definitely a felony and maybe a very serious one if…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 10:12 AM
8

Here's my comment that will have to stay in this safe space Let's be clear here that we're not actually talking about rape. To them rape is a political platform and something that confers authority. Also, women are a little weird in this regard. Many fetishise rape. Just look around on reddit and you will find subreddits chock full of women who fantasize about rape. They've been brought up before, but for example /r/forcedbreeding and similar. There are countless. You can never know if this rape…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 09:09 AM
2

You sure say some funny shit. Interracial porn is the wort category. It’s like watching National Geographic. Look I'm an evil white overlord representative. In our last evil counsil meeting we decided to hide our transient white characteristic to obfuscate our true nature: Evil. The way we will do this is to impregnate women of color. Pretty soon people won't understand what's going on. They'll see "blacks", "latinos" and "asians" engaging in white-collar crime and oppressing minorities. They wo…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 09:04 AM
1

Let's be clear here that we're not actually talking about rape. To them rape is a political platform and something that confers authority. Also, women are a little weird in this regard. Many fetishise rape. Just look around on reddit and you will find subreddits chock full of women who fantasize about rape. They've been brought up before, but for example /r/forcedbreeding and similar. There are countless. You can never know if this rape talk isn't some kind of LARPing behavior that feminists hav…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 08:40 AM
3

They have to maintain some sense of order and tidiness or they will be banned. That's the beauty of operant conditioning chambers like reddit. Soon the test mice themselves become enforcers of the new ways. If you want a "speak your mind" kind of place then reddit isn't it. I doubt your title here is accurate, but I don't know. What is probably accurate is that feminists on reddit are very busy reporting incindiary comments to the admins in hopes of getting places with opinions that they don't l…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 08:00 AM
5

If this happens to you then don't hit back. Don't retaliate. Only use violence to neutralize an ongoing threat. So if she kept wailing, then drop her. Bruises go away. That's a clear battery and assault charge ready to be pressed. Might very well be a felony. Getting your wallet rampaged and having a charge that's stuck on a record is ultimately going to hurt more than any amount of bruising.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 07:47 AM
1

Sure, but it is also usually tied to religion. What I'd say you have to be a bit wary of is to call whatever women choose for themselves a patriarchy. In an underdeveloped country if a woman picks a man and never asserts herself and her wishes in any way and the man assumes a leadership role that she follows then whatever you call that is what she wanted. That a lot of women pass through life passively in many regards and elect to follow is their own choice, not some institiution or sytem of rul…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 07:35 AM
11

We can't help it. The refractory period is what it is.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:36 PM
12

I think you should consider that we as humans have until very recently been highly religious and susceptible to various dogma. Traditional religion is now in decline, but the human need for order and simple explanations for why the world and things are as they are have remained. Feminism offers a comforting explanation for most all ills women suffer: Patriarchy. They have varying definitions as to what it is exactly. The ones you've listed and more academic ones that considers structures and ins…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 06:26 PM
11

He picked his filter and she didn't pass. She also conflated herself with women. With that misapprehension he knew that he wasn't getting to know another person, but some representative of a group she had conceptualized for herself. Personally I'd steer clear of anyone who takes themselves so seriously that they can't laugh at themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 06:05 PM
6

You have to realize that the reason you feel this way is that you put much too high value in sex and having a relationship. The men around you who you see enjoy these things probably never valued it at all. They focused on themselves and the women you see around them are simply a byproduct of their success. Obviously women who are even just moderately attractive will have an easier time when there are many men around with your kind of attitude and mindset. At the same time this also explains why…
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:14 PM
36

I'd attempt to see how deep the rabbithole goes. Give off the impression that you've had a change of heart. Then one day tell your mom that if you were falsely accused of rape, which of course almost never happens, you'd plead guilty because doing otherwise could discourage other women from coming forward to the police. Maybe tell her you have this nagging feeling that men are evil and violent or just socialized to be evil and violent. This could be a good way to really get to know your mom and …
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:36 AM
1

I would consider shooting someone who is attacking you a reasonable use of force. Of course, if you shoot simply to evict them, then I think that would be unreasonable. However if we can't shoot people to evict them then we need to build our houses differently so that any room can be turned into a shut prison cell until the cops arrive.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 09:55 PM
1

Well that additional piece of information suggests untruthful and crazy.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:11 PM
3

If enough band together for change then violence becomes even less necessary. Under certain circumstances, as permitted by the law, violence is a necessary evil. The idea of sitting down and taking it doesn't sit well with me. However that is rarely what the law says about that matter. Even the restrictive "meet force with proportionate force" that is the letter of the law here and there makes allowances for you to defend yourself. Personally I doubt there would have been a big fuss over the mat…
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:04 PM
5

Which would be pretty telling if so. I'm inclined to think so as well because whenever I have seen this idea be exposed to women they have usually reacted with a feeling of this situation somehow being wrong. That is when they are put in the same no-choice situation as a man would be in.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 01:20 PM
6

I'm going to agree that there's problematic law in place when it comes to self-defense in many places. For example the letter of the law in New Zealand for example disallows the procuring of a gun for use in self-defense, but have allowed its use in ending home assaults. At the same time self-defense is allowed, but force must only be met with proportionate force. Thus for a very pedantic reading of that if a home-intruder with a knife comes along you are only allowed to pick a similar knife to …
/r/MensRights27/08/21 01:10 PM
10

If you find yourself somewhere where you can realistically only pursue justice (i.e. taking the money back) by posessing power unmatched (i.e you could disable any attacker, by being armed or something) then perhaps that is a place from which you should leave. In reality you simply involved someone who had nothing to do with the incident and made it their problem. What are you going to do to a woman breaking and entering into your home?
/r/MensRights27/08/21 12:31 PM
2

Instead of considering that we should consider what exactly the right of abortion entails. I for one think it should only be considered to be the right to expell contents. Not to directly end something that is alive in some capacity. That should only be an allowable indirect consequence. There may come a time when we will be able to transfer the developing fetus to an artificial womb or a surrogate as an abortion. At that point in time the woman must naturally be subject to paying the father chi…
/r/MensRights27/08/21 12:06 PM
19

People's past very often predict their future. Would you hire an employee because of some platitude like everyone deserves a chance, but at the same time they were fired from dozens of former jobs or have been job hopping like crazy? Vet your partner's history thoroughly is absolutely sound advice in conjunction with making sure you're not in a draconian jursdiction like the US or UK (and other similar ones).
/r/MensRights27/08/21 11:44 AM
1

I'm just going to copy and paste here. A lot of "MRAs" I think just want to suffer and complain. So they will not be proactive and vote with their feet. Their clinging to something that is not working out for them, whether it be suffering, patriotism or just being a dumbass tend to land them right where they belong. They end up feeding the machine that produces everything they purport to be against. It is a very simple and effective method for the individual to vote with their feet. If enough do…
/r/MensRights27/08/21 11:38 AM
-3

Not that it applies here, but in certain cases it is possible to be untruthful without being crazy or a liar. You may simply be wrong and untruthful as a result. For example if a woman says she was raped at a party and she is presented with "we know it had to have been one of these two, who were seen in the hall passing your room" (which it is not) and she feels that she recalls one, then she is simply wrong. Not lying. Not crazy. Happens all the time.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 09:09 AM
7

I'm going to guess this was a man who wanted to meet up with a woman and asked more than once about it. I'd say once is enough. Give any woman one opportunity, but then move on. If you are going to live your life giving women assurances then pretty soon that's all you're going to be doing. I once had some nerve-wreck tell me that she was anxious that I would kill her or something for suggesting to grab a coffee somewhere. This is something she revealed in a string of increasingly desperate pleas…
/r/MensRights27/08/21 08:39 AM
3

Nah, the more men who leave social media and instead operate through a careful screening of whom may speak to them, the better. Your attention should be a scarce resource. In fact it is. Cut the noise out. Misandry thrives in any environment that will entertain it.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 08:16 AM
2

I want to congratulate you. The fact of the matter is that reddit is one big operant conditioning chamber or Skinner's box that is among other things used by some nasty women to nudge towards normalization of misandry and to condition men to only express themselves in accordance to their liking.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 08:08 AM
1

I don't disagree that these are issues present in these regions, but these are at the end of the day specific problems for specific regions. Not something that is true in general. One of the very best forms for men's rights activism is to recognize such regions, raise awareness and to promote an exodus from such regions.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 07:59 AM
1

They are not really that problematic. The feminist footsoldiers are the men whose retardation achieve escape velocity and launch them into becoming tools through which anti-male sentiments and policies can be implemented. These are the men who basically look at the feminist fantasy of a man as violent killers out to get them and act it out down to the letter. These guys who are just yes-men drinking their lattes and occasionally self-flagelating aren't a big deal.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 12:46 AM
0

The US and UK are not really part of the civilized and free world. They are more like inverted Taliban/ISIS-like states. These problems go away elsewhere.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 12:34 AM
-2

A lot of "MRAs" I think just want to suffer and complain. So they will not be proactive and vote with their feet. Their clinging to something that is not working out for them, whether it be suffering, patriotism or just being a dumbass tend to land them right where they belong. They end up feeding the machine that produces everything they purport to be against. It is a very simple and effective method for the individual to vote with their feet. If enough do it we would see change, at least for t…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 03:49 PM
5

People who vote with their feet will achieve their desired results one way or the other. It is the best form of activism.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:56 AM
-3

That also depends on the jurisdiction you're in. The payments are draconian in the US as they are often set to an unreasonable amount instead of based on actual costs of maintaining alright living conditions. Still in more progressive countries it is under consideration whether to cover things like child support over tax and to allow "father's" to choose to not be involved. This is a better option as it would incentivize society to maintain some social pressure to stigmatize men and women who br…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:40 AM
-2

This is true for married people in for example the US, but ultimately it is the choice of any male or female US citizen to remain so. We make a lot of choices through our non-action and must live with the consequences. Notice that I refer to either sex. This isn't strictly a sexist issue in the US. It is simply a result of the circumstances under which men choose to marry women. Men who are clever choose to be the lower earner and make sure to meet whatever else requirements to end up being the …
/r/MensRights26/08/21 09:19 AM
-11

Can you concretely point out one case where a woman is able to have all kinds of privileges and fun while enjoying no responsibilities? Such that if a man is in that same situation he is forced into responsibilities.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 09:10 AM
-1

Words to live by I say. In fact I've always lived like that. I will enjoy women and what they offer, but I don't commit to any responsibilities to them. I simply take care of any resulting children as those are directly tied to my own interests. Just to clarify, what are these responsibilites?
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:57 AM
-13

I know a man whose partner was raped and she carried the pregnancy to term. At that point, or maybe before, the man simply lost all attraction to her and decided to leave. I don't think it's unreasonable to leave under such circumstances. Now this situation kind of makes sense as well. Deep down this family wants the man to spend all his resources on their daughter and whatever results she produces. That they end up acting out when something interferes with that is understandable from an animali…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:38 AM
35

They are not interested in universality. Certain types of discrimination and bigotry just doesn't hurt reddit's bottom line and may even be profitable to allow.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:14 AM
3

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here and set aside my sarcastic critique of assumptions. Let's go into this then without snark. It's clearly women going by the context of this post. Where things go wrong is where it's unspecified for which qualifier of women and the person I'm arguing with immediately assumes it's all women. When feminists say men rape women or women are raped by men that is just correct usage of plural. One does not immediately translate those statements to all men rape women …
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:40 PM
2

I'm thinking there's probably some amount of hypocrisy involved in this situation.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 09:01 PM
6

You're right. It doesn't mention women at all. Why did you even assume that?
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:40 PM
5

That is your interpretation of their telling. There is no correct one either of us two can know for sure, unless you take it upon yourself to be an authoritative source on this matter. I think I'll withold your type of judgement until they themselves clear up this matter.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:29 PM
4

It's not untruthful when considering a subgroup of women. Sure, could be said for men and women as a whole, but now we're talking about a certain group of subgroup of activists that happen to be women. It wasn't that long ago that several men attempted a rather subversive method of targeting a public rape reporting site at some university by submitting false reports targeting the people who were behind said reporting mechanism.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:14 PM
1

If you know reddit so well then you know the first astroturfing campaign done on reddit was done by its founders through a legion of sockpuppets. They were in existence to jump-start the site over the treshold of activity that people need to see to be convinced that "this is where it's happening" or "this site is popular". So dishonesty and manipulation has been the essence of reddit from the very beginning. It is precisely your laziness and unwillingess to be proactive that at the end of the da…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:09 PM
2

From its very inception the place was created through a system of manipulation. You may think that bots are a recent thing, but they have been here since the beginning. Initially to inflate the user count and create the illusion of a surge in popularity. If you believe you are not subject to a carefully constructed set of ideas, I think you are sorely mistaken. Maybe go out in the real world and engage with a set of ideas that have for sure not be carefully crafted to form who you are. And then …
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:22 PM
3

I can submit evidence that this is occurring, but I will stick to an example. Just consider the John Cena incident where he basically prostrated himself in a groveling apology in China for mentioning Taiwan as a country. Now consider the kind of content that is suddenly on the rise here after the man was mocked for being a spineless coward. Here we are presented with the correct and important and approved narrative about John Cena. Look how can you criticize such an upstanding man? It is only na…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:16 PM
7

I predict that my plural use of women here wil be conflated with all women. A simple way to disredit this is as portraying it as some presentation of the dastardly plan of all women everywhere in cahoots to control you. You only need to take a look around on reddit to find the ones who are attempting to do it... The best way to escape this stupid box is to simply leave and disengange with this site in a social way.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:28 PM
46

Look, reddit is one big Skinner's box. It was created to manipulate the masses of people here through a system of reward and punishment and the illusion of self-made choices. First and foremost for market purposes, but now many have come to the realization that this is also a great way to assert social control. There is a subgroup of women who now wish to utilize these techniques to gently manipulate your way of thinking. Do you know of the moral panic and air that surrounds certain topics? For …
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:05 PM
3

Why would you not abandon a place that has abandoned you for a long time ago? Besides the two are not mutually exclusive. By leaving, you in fact are fighting. By staying you cast your vote that "yes, I will be subject to and abide by these practises and laws". Just consider how you would see this in a relationship. Would you stay with a woman who beat you daily hoping to fight the injustice by making her realize the error in her ways? Or would you leave to make a clear statement that this is wr…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:26 AM
3

I'm not an american. What I'm suggesting is that americans expatriate and become citizens of other countries AND THEN have children there. They will no longer be subject to american law so long as they go through the formal process of signing an oath of renunciation. After that they will no longer be US citizens.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:11 AM
3

Nah, leave the country. Leave to go where you are treated well. It's not hard to find a better place. Almost anywhere else it can only get better.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:01 AM
2

A lot of countries have child support laws where the amount is determined through the average cost of living in the area, as opposed to a fixed percentage of one's income at some point in time. There is no way around it. Most American law when it comes to this is downright draconian. America is not rich. Most of it is in shambles as far as infrastructure is concerned. America is heavily in debt. A few corporations and individuals in America are insanely rich though.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:54 AM
1

It would take about 50 years to really screen for this behavior. why do men even marry women There is really no good reason.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:03 AM
1

For the individual it is an immediate solution. If enough do it then it will become a collective solution. After all "divorce" is the correct solution to a "marriage" that is not working.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:00 AM
-2

Having kids isn't a very big deal if you just go do it anywhere but in the US, UK or countries with similar laws. Marriage can be done away with anywhere. Vote with your penises. Any time you knock a woman up in a country with laws you find lopsided. Guess what? You get what you voted for. This isn't even some "go take advantage of women in the third world" kind of thing. Pretty much any sane country won't have you going bankrupt for knocking a woman up. This guy sounds like an American so just …
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:39 PM
2

I'm saying I don't understand your refutation that I will now quote This is one study that poses a theory. It is not evidence that women will “always” pick a “higher-status” mate. The divorce rate continues to lower and for educated people, it’s only 30%. Can you see why? The highly educated are in the upper percentile when it comes to status and such I would think. Therefore it stands to reason that the much lower divorce rate can be explained by how higher status options are few and far inbetw…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:23 PM
2

Your data could just as well be in support of their theory. For educated people there is naturally going to be a much smaller pool of "higher status" candidates.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:12 PM
2

Heck I'd just say I got my penis amputated in an accident and so I only want friends. Simple and probably works on most peabrains. I don't care how I would be identified. Whatever works so I can go about my business without interference.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:56 PM
4

The path of least resistance is actually to just say you are gay or asexual or aromantic. Or say you don't have a penis because you lost it in an accident. If you have had sex with a woman and she is attempting to instigate a relationship that you do not wish to have then you can simply say you fell out of love and can't help it. Or that you simply don't have such feelings or want to do something else. I honestly don't think a man needs to justify himself in any way wrt. how he chooses to live h…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:45 PM
7

I think you are conflating the idea or philosophy of MGTOW with a subreddit or specific group or instance of adherents of some conception of the MGTOW idea and philosophy. At the end of the day reddit is a business and so they must be careful to distance themselves from bad press. If I and several other people were to present as feminists for a long time here, posting questionable content but still managing to rouse some radicals of the feminists who espouse some sympathy towards violence, and t…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:26 PM
1

Interesting….. do you really think feminists want men to not commit to women? I think that's immaterial and so I don't really care to form any opinion about whatever is a predominant stance there. I simply consider their statement that men are to blame for their woes to be poignant in this context. At the end of the day the problems a man got into through marriage was of his own choosing. It's also getting harder and harder to end up divorced and claim to have been completely unaware that this w…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:54 PM
1

Being called a troll is an honor, you should not take offense.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:34 PM
-4

You don't have to respond as you are a troll, my answer was mostly for the non-troll spectators.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:26 PM
-7

It is probably safe to marry a woman you completely understand and trust. A reasonable degree of understanding and trust in another person (if risk of negative outcomes is to reach approx. 0%) can be achieved in about 50 years. Most marriages happen quicker, which may explain the 70-80% statistic.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:24 PM
4

Yeah that's probably the reason and a good reason for us to show compassion and raise awareness. Still though. This sort of works the same way as with ignorance wrt. the law. You will rarely ever get a pass for breaking a law due to not knowing of it. You have to be proactive and learn what you must avoid doing.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:20 PM
-8

Your analogy is a failure. A more applicable one would be that a man stood by and watched as other men went to Wallmart (or at least could have). As he watched he noticed about 70-80% were killed in there... And then he went in himself. Sure, what happens to him now might not be his doing or fault entirely... But you know? Wouldn't it be better to just not enter Wallmart, all things considered?
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:16 PM
-14

I think feminists often say that men suffer by their own hand. In this case they are almost certainly correct. A man must own up to the consequence of his choices. There is no destiny set it stone, but if one wishes to mitigate the risk of negative outcomes to 0% in this respect then it stands to reason to simply not marry. It is more enjoyable to simply reproduce and spend time with your children. Offspring is a very tangible result whereas the union of marriage is often volatile. I think a wom…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:50 PM
98

The real question is, knowing this, why do men pursue bad odds. A lot of the woes this sub considers stems from issues wrt. marriage. A practical solution to all of those is to avoid marriage.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter