TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ryouba Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by ryouba on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

I don't know... a majority of the comments on her article are actually condemning her for showing people how to be a jerk.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 08:43 PM
7

Wow, that's a really sad event. It amazes me sometimes how the mind of a psychopath fails to comprehend the consequences of such a horrendous act.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:25 AM
2

The odd thing is that she did use a pen name when she published the book.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:29 PM
1

Ooh baby, it's making me crazy... [that professional organizations lack the coherence to discern sexist crimes from violence against another human being.]
/r/MensRights25/04/12 12:40 AM
8

"Lol, we were just joking, xxxxxxxx! But wouldn't that be funny!"
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:11 PM
1

I think we should e-mail the paper and disapprove of their biased little remark at the end of the article. Either that or ask them to elaborate on what exactly do they disagree with.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:48 PM
1

Just curious, would a public school be filed under "private place", though?
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:03 PM
1

Any punishment would have to stem from the fact that he used the faces of the children in his recording when the sound file was not school appropriate. To me, that sounds like "public defamation", due to the fact that he used the children's faces in the video without informing any one, "Hey, I'm going to be editing the song later with one that's sexually explicit, but I'm going to keep your childrens' faces associated with the sexually explicit song, is that cool?". If he cut out the children's …
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:02 PM
1

Ok, so law wasn't the appropriate wording. Noted; and I will edit it after this post. According to the district website, they do recognize that the recording was not done in front of the children, due to having the teacher in the room with the performer. The outrage is from the altering of the video AFTER the fact, so technically, the children were released by their parents to be recorded for him playing "Lunch Lady Land". I am going to revoke what I've said, because I was misinformed. I still p…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:49 PM
1

Ok, so upon looking, I don't see anything on the federal level about it. But I've worked in the public school system for almost two years now, and children under the age of 18 must have their parents sign a waiver to allow for the video recording of their children. It might be a state-level thing, it might be a district-level thing, but I was under the impression that this was observed countrywide. I am going to look for the form in the particular district that this incident took place; normally…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:36 PM
3

I'm actually really pissed that this comment, which makes the most sense in regards to the issue at hand, is at the bottom, downvoted by the hivemind of "OMG HE DID NOTHING WRONG AT ALL". Folks: You have to have each and every child that is going to be videotaped be signed a waiver to video-tape by their parents or guardian. It protects against using the children's faces for commercial gain, and also to prevent things like this from going on. What he did was recorded them listening to an appropr…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:28 PM
1

The rules in most districts, as far as I know, also state to not film children under the age of 18 without parental consent. Free speech isn't the issue here. The issue is that there are children's faces associated with the edit. If I were a parent, even if I knew it was a shop, I don't think I would want my child's face on the Internet, especially if I didn't agree to it. Now, I agree "sex offender" and "20 years" takes it way too far in this case, but I think he needs a little more than a "sla…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:18 PM
4

I'm surprised this isn't at the top. I'm a music teacher, so whenever I "recorded the class", it was audio only and there was nothing in the recording that could identify any one. It was mainly recording tracks of music that they did, or recording orchestra pieces for educational and evaluative purposes. This guy deserves to get in trouble for the editing, but not as a sex offender. The issue is that he had their recorded image associated with the "dub-over" song. If he would have done this in a…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:14 PM
17

It should be. This whole social pattern of "He pays for my food all of the time!" is outdated and sexist. Me and my girlfriend of almost 3 years either split the bill or we keep it pretty even on who covers when.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 08:08 PM
6

Wow, seeing as it is not uncommon to see cases of testicular cancer strike at 17 years, I feel that Facebook is doing a disservice by censoring this--or any sort of cancer advocacy--from their userbase.
/r/MensRights11/09/10 04:12 PM
1

[Directed by M. Night Shyamalan]
/r/MensRights07/07/10 03:40 PM
-3

I'm not going to agree with what the teacher did, because striking a student is indeed wrong, and she's going to probably be fired along with the other adults that were watching this take place. However, the student probably instigated the situation.
/r/MensRights15/05/10 07:29 PM
2

So, then, this isn't just a website about women making/eating/enjoying a bowl of cole slaw?
/r/MensRights13/04/10 10:20 AM
13

Pedophilia: The witch hunt of the 21st century.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 11:23 AM
4

I heard about this on NPR this morning... Apparently their reasoning was because of the young men grabbing large bags of rice and stealing food... http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123202099
/r/MensRights02/02/10 03:26 AM
1

... :(
/r/MensRights14/01/10 10:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter