TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sabian92 Archive

View 4 posts and 94 comments by sabian92 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

She is still involved. No fucker made her do anything. Jesus.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:50 PM
1

If I have my fiancee and her parents in the car I use them if I need a cash machine or something but I wouldn't park and do a week's shop. There's no age limit on the signs. They're parents and she is their child.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:53 AM
7

Indeed, and I don't. I'm surprised that specifically banning men from an event is even legal to be honest, and I'm even more surprised big corporations like Tesco even support a charity that's so outwardly sexist and discriminates. My local police force tweeted about this as well, saying people should come and give support. I tweeted back that until it allows men to participate, it can sod off.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:59 PM
1

I can see your point but this is a digital law, not a mental one. You can see the process behind it as copy/paste does create a new copy of something, therefore you have produced something that didn't exist beforehand.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:35 PM
2

No, they're not. ABH is ABH and GBH is GBH. Yeah they're assault based crimes but nothing more.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:16 PM
2

We don't umbrella other crimes. Murder and manslaughter are separate as are ABH/GBH. Rape should stay as rape.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 01:06 AM
6

Yes. Of course it should.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:21 AM
4

This is disgusting. All the power to those men.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:20 PM
1

To be fair I think of the majority of those things often as we all do. Doesn't make us all violent rapists hellbent on destroying society though. I don't often think of Asian men, oddly enough.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:55 AM
1

Yeah, I see your point on photos. I can't say that it's particularly appropriate to do that although not illegal (at least not in the UK - if you're in public, you are free to be filmed/photographed even if you're Police or Army). The rest of it though is just biology. It's what both sexes do although obviously women are a lot less likely to admit it than men because then they can pull the "I'M NOT A PIECE OF MEAT" card.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 01:44 AM
2

This isn't perving, this is what people do because we're programmed to. Taking photos... eh, pretty weird. Not a fan of creeper shots. But just looking is how we used to find mates when we were apes and shit.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 04:53 PM
7

You might not believe now but that doesn't mean she won't. Lawyer the hell up.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 04:49 PM
14

What really gets up my nose is that sex toys for women are "This can replace your man, this won't fall asleep on you!", they're almost "cool" and "trendy" (especially Rampant Rabbits etc) where as sex toys for men (like fake vaginas and shit) are "WHAT THE FUCK THAT IS DISGUSTING YOU PERVERT GET AWAY FROM ME".
/r/MensRights18/01/14 04:24 PM
0

Paranoid. If she was cheating she probably wouldn't be interested in sex.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 10:56 PM
2

Yeah, it's not a bad system although the limits for the various loan amounts are all wrong. If you're poor, you get everything, if you're rich they expect your parents to bankroll you. The problem is if you have parents that are comfortable but not rich, they still expect your parents to bankroll you but they can't afford it.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:08 PM
1

Some unis have owned accommodation, some don't. The one I went to before I dropped out shared their accommodation with the other unis in the area so I'm not sure how that works. They were managed by a 3rd party company though.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:21 PM
6

We don't all drink tea nor do we all have bad teeth.... :P University accommodation here is usually 5-6 people to an apartment, each with their own room and then a common kitchen/living room. Some rooms will have en-suite bathroom facilities, some don't. Depends on what you can afford. I stayed at home because I wasn't that far away and honestly, living in a flat with 5 strangers didn't sound like my sort of fun. It's £3k (About $5k) a year or so to stay in something like that but then you have …
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:19 PM
12

University in the UK is nothing like that but then the accommodation isn't owned by them. They're private off-campus places usually.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:46 PM
19

Not everybody. I didn't but then I'm not American.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:15 PM
0

Sounds like a company that's full of shit.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:00 PM
3

I agree entirely. Maybe I should have thought about my post a little more. Rape accusations are taken very seriously and even if you aren't guilty of it you are found guilty by "trial of the people".
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:50 PM
4

Tell them that it isn't levelling the playing field if men are excluded for being men. Actually as well I'm pretty sure it's illegal due to the UK having quite decent discrimination laws. I'd complain and if it does nothing, take it further.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:29 AM
0

Ask /u/z1ke.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:50 AM
3

Where do you live out of interest? In the UK nobody is prosecuted then slapped with a lawsuit for said crime.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:31 AM
2

No. I don't. 2 Wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:15 AM
9

Suing is a civil thing, not a criminal thing. Not only that, suing is almost always a US thing. I understand a basic amount but keep in mind we're probably comparing 2 entirely different legal systems.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:13 AM
4

Woah, nobody is getting raped here. If you rape somebody as punishment you are no better than the moron claiming about a rape that didn't happen. Maybe they do deserve more, but nobody is getting fucking raped.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:42 AM
3

An erection isn't consent under UK law just as being wet isn't consent but I'm not sure a court or more importantly a jury would see it the same way. Logic is a theory. Practically it's a whole other kettle of fish.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:40 AM
2

But the man is still a victim. The post I was referencing said men are unable to be raped which is untrue. A man raping a man is rape. A woman raping a man is still rape in the traditional sense of the word - the sentence is no different, the record would just reflect a different crime. And let's be honest, "sexual assault by penetration" isn't exactly any less worse than "rape".
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:35 AM
12

Just googled that. Christ on a bike. That's horrendous. At least if you're going to lie (which I don't promote, by the way) don't then admit to lying after getting an innocent man sent to prison and $1.5m in "damages".
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:00 AM
-2

I'd like to see a source on that. I highly doubt in any civilised country men aren't able to be rape victims. That being said, under English/Welsh law only men can rape. The equivalent crime if you commit it as a woman is "Sexual assault by penetration" Part I of the Act makes many changes to the sexual crimes laws in England and Wales (and to some extent Northern Ireland), almost completely replacing the Sexual Offences Act 1956. Rape has been redefined from the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (amende…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 11:25 PM
8

To be fair it isn't only women that are rape fakers. I'm sure men do it - it's only reported generally as women but it doesn't mean men don't do it, and you can't send a man to a women's prison because "hurr durr feminism we dezerve our own prisons amirite men r skumbags"
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:33 PM
71

Hell no. They should be given the same sentence the "rapist" would have gotten if he'd gone to prison. Then they should be sued.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:14 PM
2

Thing is though, this isn't just a porn filter. It's a filter for anything deemed to be "inappropriate" for under 18s. Including blocking the childline website.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 01:40 PM
1

I admit it's unlikely but it could happen.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 03:13 AM
1

Depends on the crime I suppose - that webpage doesn't say "if you are convicted of X then you may not bring your child with you". If you're convicted of murder then you'll be getting life anyway.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:27 AM
2

What if you're a single father who is widowed?
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:03 AM
4

Ah, I see. It's known as "beasting" in the UK forces (I think). One rule for one...
/r/MensRights03/01/14 07:21 PM
6

Hazing?
/r/MensRights03/01/14 07:14 PM
19

Instead of ruling they don't have to do them, make them get strong enough so they can?
/r/MensRights03/01/14 05:14 PM
1

I don't even want to read the rest of that. I read the first line and my Jimmies are rustled.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 08:09 PM
0

I understand completely and I know sometimes we think with our genitals not our brain (I'm certainly guilty of that) but you need to keep your distance. If she is a femi-mental then it can only go from bad to worse for you if she makes a complaint. Not only that if you do have sex (consensually or not) the evidence will be there you did have intercourse and you can see how it can be manipulated from "consensual sex" to "OMG HE BRUTALLY RAPED ME"
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:11 AM
0

Yeah, I mean if you want to spend the night with her, by all means do so. But I'd refuse any sexual advances and if you're ultra-paranoid, use a dictaphone and record yourself refusing. Ultra feminists will do ridiculous things - beat her at her own game by doing even more ridiculous things to protect yourself. Don't take a condom with you as that could signal sexual intent. Don't drink either - remember, all drunk men are rapists, right?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 11:48 PM
26

Because women never lie, right? Oh, it happened 6 months ago? Ah, no DNA. He's still guilty on your say-so, right? God, why not just shoot the guy now.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 11:45 PM
-2

If I have learned anything from this sub, don't. Unless you want a false rape conviction, don't.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 11:37 PM
12

Makes her feel less guilty about divorcing somebody who relies on her. She's trying to justify in her head that it's okay to leave you if she says she was considering it beforehand. I'm not saying you rely on her because of anything bad - my grandmother had a stroke and she spent 10 years of her life before she died relying on everybody and she hated it, so I know how it can feel. I do sympathise.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:39 PM
2

What people fail to see sometimes is that cheating is not the cause of a bad result, but as a result of one.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:59 AM
1

Congrats on finding somebody apparently pretty special, hope you guys have a good Christmas :D
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:44 AM
6

Marry that girl, she's a keeper.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:14 AM
2

Good Lord :/ What kind of parent poisons their children into that?
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:00 AM
5

Under UK law if you copy and paste a picture of a child being raped or whatever you have "produced" it as a new copy of it that previously didn't exist now does exist. Not as ridiculous as it sounds.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 10:31 PM
1

He end up in prison on a false child porn conviction?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 10:29 PM
1

It is and these morons were given new identities, a free university education in prison if they wanted it, a house, everything because they couldn't be given a whole life tariff at the age they were. The scary thing is if they were a year younger when they'd committed this crime (which is not out of the realm of possibility) they couldn't have been charged with anything whatsoever as the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales is 10. They are on licence for life though so they can be…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:13 PM
9

Well, yeah, I gathered that but I don't really use age as a "nah, he couldn't of done that, he's only 10!" because this happened: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger Happened 10 miles from where I live. People still talk about it like it was a recent event.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 02:14 AM
8

Especially when they've been coerced but there are 10 year old murderers out there (and in the beginning the police didn't know he'd been coerced into it from what I gather).
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:41 AM
9

I meant like was he charged with anything or considered a suspect previously?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:37 AM
28

Life without parole sounds about right. What happened to the kid?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:11 AM
3

Doesn't matter if you're the parent or not - you share that child with another human being and that does not give anybody (male or female) to deprive the other of contact by abducting their own child.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:09 PM
1

True, but if they're torturing me then screw it.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 05:25 PM
21

Seriously? First chance to escape I'd take it even if it meant killing the captor.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:14 AM
2

A fat girl got on top of me and stuck my dick inside her. Awesome way to lose my virginity.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 09:25 PM
3

I see. So battered men can't kill their abusers? What about fish? They're deepfried after their battering! This entire thing is ridiculous. Nobody has the right to murder anybody.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:28 AM
10

I'd call bullshit on that but unfortunately I live here too and know you aren't lying.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 10:11 AM
1

But if I did I wouldn't abandon them like a coward.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:43 PM
1

I didn't walk away from my kids. I'm already far ahead of you.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:29 PM
1

I don't have OCD nor Tourette's. Obviously you don't know what either of these things are. Asperger's yes. But you wouldn't know unless I told you (which I did).
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:57 PM
1

In what way? Nothing I wrote there makes me look like one, so either you're just saying it for the hell of it or you're amazingly talented at being able to know people over the internet.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:25 PM
2

You have the gall to call me uneducated and you don't know the difference between could and couldn't. It's I COULDN'T CARE LESS. If you could care less then you would, you idiot.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:51 PM
2

God damn it, I'm 5'11. Guess the ridiculous amount of body hair, penis and deep voice make me a woman.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 11:33 AM
1

There are parents who abandon their kids then form a relationship because they need a kidney or something, then run off again. It happens. I don't assume that a kid would only be interested in money but if they have a rich dad and a poor mother (which isn't the case here judging from the OP anyway) it's not hard to see why kids would be interested in it - kids can be incredibly shallow (not deliberately, just because "oooh, shiny-shiny"). I still don't think dropping the fight for your children …
/r/MensRights08/12/13 11:23 AM
0

I don't see how it matters. Degree level education proves I'm not a complete idiot. For what it's worth, I have a BSc in Computer Forensics from quite a good UK university, but I fail to see how that makes a difference. A degree is a degree. I grew up pretty quickly after my mother died. I took care of my younger brother because my dad was too drunk to care. I cooked for him, dressed him, washed him, put him to bed all while trying to get to grips with my own mother dying. I then had to deal wit…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 01:44 AM
0

I have an education, thanks. Educated to degree level, so not exactly an idiot. I have a job as well, so on both counts you are about as wrong as your morals. I don't care to argue with you any longer as in my opinion you are a shit parent, and having experienced my own fair share of shit parenting I don't really want to argue with you why you think you're right.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 01:33 AM
4

Maybe I am lacking in experience - I don't have my own kids. But it doesn't make my opinion any less valid. You also know jack-shit about me as well so you aren't really one to judge me. I've been on the other side of this and having a parent leave/treat you like you don't matter is horrible. It's like you are worth nothing in the eyes of the person who put you on this earth - the kids didn't ask to be put on this earth, so why treat them like they mean nothing? You act all happy with your new t…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 11:08 PM
-1

You wrote in your OP that you won, but the court order wasn't served - if you'd got the order then you'd done 80% of the work. Why bother going through all that hassle if you were going to walk away anyway? I just find it abhorrent as a father you turned your back on your own children and stopped fighting for them. I know my opinion may be controversial and probably get me a lot of downvotes (but honestly, zero fucks given - it's a number on my profile) but a parent should never stop fighting fo…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:14 PM
0

It's incredibly sad that you had to leave your kids just to get away from your ex-wife. Nobody should have to do that. You're right - she probably will make you out to be the devil. But the best thing you can do for them is at least if they come looking is be open to conversation with them - if you walk from that then you sort of are the bad guy. A parent should have unconditional love for their children and even if they're poisoned against you, you should be open to at least showing that it's n…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:47 PM
1

Not sure on the particulars of it but in England and Wales (Scotland and Northern Ireland have different legal systems) sexual assault is anything up to rape, and then rape is penetration with digits, penises, objects and in any hole. Women however, cannot legally rape. They can commit "assault by penetration" I think it's termed. Essentially if you don't have a dick you aren't a rapist. Relevant legal stuff: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Offences_Act_2003
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:47 PM
6

Makes me want to flash people and sleep. Could be worse.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:43 AM
1

No, I get that, but if mummy is just spending it on booze and smokes then that's not fair. It should go into a system where it can ONLY be spent on the child. Dunno how that would work but would be nice.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:36 AM
3

You shouldn't have to pay just to spend time with your own offspring.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 12:42 AM
2

I know two convicted rapists, one a guy I went to college with and another guy who was friends with my younger brother. First one raped a 12 year old at 19 or so and another raped a girl "under 16" when he was 18. Not saying girls don't rape but you never know who might be a rapist waiting to strike.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 05:53 PM
5

UK too.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 10:44 PM
1

We both know that the crime of "making a false rape allegation" will never fly. Women can't even be convicted of rape in the UK as they don't have a cock. Not saying that men can't make false accusations but it's 99% women that do.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:31 AM
3

sigh God damnit. If so then I apologise. If not.... you're a shitlord.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:47 PM
3

Making a false rape accusation is Perverting the Course of Justice in the UK.... it's the only thing they can get you on. It's either that or let her go free. One thing that annoys me is that she got 3 months. I guarantee if he'd gone to prison on her false accusation he'd have done a lot more than 3 months.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:44 PM
0

How am I oppressing women? I'm engaged, you cuntfuck. My fiancee is training to be a therapist and I'm not particularly academic so of course she'll eventually do better than me academically/probably end up earning more than me. I'm free to be what I want to be, to hell what anybody else wants. What you said is oppressing men. The only reason I'm shit at education-based stuff is because I've got learning difficulties. Shitlord.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:40 PM
-1

Because men don't want to be the sole breadwinner, more than likely. I certainly don't (and won't be).
/r/MensRights25/11/13 05:41 PM
2

We have loads of anti-discrimination laws so it makes it even worse. You can't discriminate for race, gender, disability, sexuality, anything. But you can give black kids money for being black, so it appears.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:05 PM
0

You want rage? The uni I attend has scholarships (this is in the UK FWIW) for various things. There's a law scolarship for students but you have to be black to apply. Seriously. If there were a white only one there would be outrage.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:29 PM
1

Bullshit. I'm going to counselling right now for depression.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 09:11 PM
1

Yeah, and scary if you're 19 and out looking to bring a girl home. Bring a girl home, get down with it, she leaves and cries rape, turns out she's 14. Uh-oh. A local club was shut down because the Police raided it and found 14 year old girls in there drinking, dressed like slags.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 01:27 PM
0

We all make mistakes (nobody is perfect after all) but when I was 19 (which makes me sound old but I'm only 21) I knew when a girl was 13 and when she was older. I dated a 13 year old when I was 15 who looked older than I did (taller, looked more developed etc) but still... you could tell she was 13. I agree the punishment was probably too harsh and you have to live with that but it is what it is unfortunately.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:17 AM
0

My thought is that if you're going to kiss a 13 year old girl do it before you're over the age of consent or in private. Doing that in public is a bit stupid.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:09 AM
7

Pretty much. Girl to guy: "Hey, you fancy getting a coffee later?" Then: "What do you mean I have to buy my own coffee you're supposed to pay!"
/r/MensRights16/11/13 05:17 PM
10

Because it isn't "equal" if you treat women how you treat men. That's "degrading".
/r/MensRights16/11/13 05:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter