~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Why is being taken care of and provided for not seen as a privilege?.. indicating that if you want to earn the better salaries, you need qualifications + experience. Nowhere on that page does it say the salary range I quoted requires a degree. What I quoted you is an average, not the upper range. Having a degree would skew you towards the upper range. It directly says "having a degree is a plus" and that it will increase your earning potential. It does not say "you need a degree to meet the average income". I seriously doubt people go from "cooking at home" to e… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/19 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Why is being taken care of and provided for not seen as a privilege?Both of those would require a 4 yr degree and experience to reach those salaries. Neither nanny nor personal chef requires a degree. I do not know what you are quoting to say they require a degree to reach those numbers either since you haven't quoted anything I can search, just made a claim of it. You have also ignored that women will be doing all of these jobs rolled into one, on top of pregnancy/birth/surrogacy. using examples of work done under completely different standards, in a completely… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/19 04:45 PM |
| 1 | Why is being taken care of and provided for not seen as a privilege?Nobody is talking about "historically" or "elsewhere". I clearly specified the circumstances. They apparently are the equivalent of "slaves who have it good", right? It is not forced. These are not the same. One of those two arrangements is voluntarily entered into, the other one is not. I will leave you to sort out which is which Arranged marriages are not voluntary. Neither is it voluntary when your only options are marry or starve. This still exists and the system that created the "expectatio… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/19 02:53 PM |
| 1 | Why is being taken care of and provided for not seen as a privilege?What a bloody ridiculous argument. I'm genuinely curious if you listen to a lot of Jordan Peterson? forced the woman into marrying a lawyer so she didnt need to worry about money? Family. Look at dowry. Arranged marriages. These do exist in some places still. Who stopped her from getting a good degree It was against the rules of most colleges in North American for women to attend for a very long time. This system also still exists in some places outside of North America. Re-read the pr… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/19 12:19 PM |
| 1 | A short history of the last 100 yearsThe mothers are not a part of the group that polices their adolescent behavior. There are no elder females present to guide them during this time period. You are proposing a situation where a child lives only with its mother from 0-12 years old then goes to live only with its father from 12+ years old as somehow indicative of a need for fathers more so than a need for mothers by saying that a PARENTLESS OFFSPRING faring poorly is evidence of this. You are comparing an orphan to a child with a si… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/19 07:46 PM |
| 0 | A short history of the last 100 yearsYou are arguing this demonstrates that fathers are important vs mothers, when in this model, there are no mothers. At all. Elephants are a sex segregated species. They live in all-male and all-female groups. That was a clear argument in the previous post. Re-read it. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/19 06:43 PM |
| 0 | A short history of the last 100 yearsYou're not responding to the argument at all, just hurling insults. I read the article. I understand the article as well as more nuances about elephant social structure; ethology with a focus on parental investment and social behavior is my niche study of interest. Please re-read my previous post. It does a fine example of laying out why this is a poor comparison of human dynamics/a 2-parent model. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/19 06:26 PM |
| 0 | A short history of the last 100 yearsElephants live in completely sex-segregated groups. They only meet to mate. This is in no way comparable to a monogamous 2-parent relationship. You would do better to study the outcome of single parent raising in monogamous species (even those that only remain monogamous for one mating season). With elephants this is more like comparing a completely parentless orphan to a single-parent child (one with a father in their male-only family group/herd). Or, rather, more comparable taking some kids fr… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/19 05:32 PM |
| 4 | A short history of the last 100 yearsThis does not account for the fact that mothers are the "default" to take them. A father who fights to keep his children is more likely to be a "good parent" than the mother who gets them by default. A lot of fathers (the fathers more likely to be bad especially) do not try to get custody, if they even know the kid exists at all (there is no scenario where the mom does not know the kid exists), and it leaves them in the default custody of the mother. "Bad" fathers are less likely to have custody… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/19 03:55 AM |
| -1 | A short history of the last 100 yearsIt's a screenshot from 4chan's /pol/ (politically incorrect) board. The same board that expressed camaraderie and approval with the Christchurch New Zealand shooter. The same board that regularly has "is there such a good thing as a perfect woman?" thread only to receive replies of "no, but there are good little girls" (fetishization of young girls as ideal due to their submissive and moldable nature). It is absolutely incel culture. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/19 03:53 AM |
| 1 | A new 'male birth control' pill might be safe, but works by lowering testosterone and may cause "fatigue, headache, acne, decreased libido and mild erectile dysfunction."This has no relation to how it is used in birth control. Again: it does not mimic pregnancy. If it mimicked pregnancy, you would not see the thinning of the lining (the exact opposite of what happens in pregnancy), and there are other hormones involved in pregnancy not used in birth control. The hormones used in pregnancy are also part of the normal cycle. BC does not mimic pregnancy nor the normal hormonal cycle. It is something artificial entirely. You are linking me to a wikipedia page that d… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/19 01:57 AM |
| 1 | A new 'male birth control' pill might be safe, but works by lowering testosterone and may cause "fatigue, headache, acne, decreased libido and mild erectile dysfunction."Progesterone is also used in the normal hormonal cycle of women. It spikes after ovulation and triggers endometrial lining thickening, in preparation for implantation of a fertilized egg released at ovulation. However, most BC pills are a combination pill - as in, not only progesterone, and have the outcome of actually thinning the lining. Again: if they were mimicing pregnancy, they would thicken the lining to create a hospital environment for the fetus. Instead they work to first stop ovulatio… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/19 01:31 AM |
| 1 | A new 'male birth control' pill might be safe, but works by lowering testosterone and may cause "fatigue, headache, acne, decreased libido and mild erectile dysfunction."Your link says "In a way" which is "Kind of, if it helps you understand, but not really" then goes on to say the only similarity is that you don't ovulate while pregnant, nor while taking birth control. It is not mimicing pregnancy any more than sitting down mimics being short; the two happen to do the same thing. There is much more involved in pregnancy, as I stated in the last comment, than simply a lack of ovulation. The thickening of cervical mucus also happens regularly during each cycle, d… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/19 11:28 PM |
| 1 | A new 'male birth control' pill might be safe, but works by lowering testosterone and may cause "fatigue, headache, acne, decreased libido and mild erectile dysfunction."This pill is not designed to lower overall testosterone. These two things are not the same. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/19 10:09 PM |
| 1 | A new 'male birth control' pill might be safe, but works by lowering testosterone and may cause "fatigue, headache, acne, decreased libido and mild erectile dysfunction."https://www.nytimes.com/1987/12/06/magazine/the-sad-legacy-of-the-dalkon-shield.html Shit happens. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/19 07:57 PM |
| 1 | A new 'male birth control' pill might be safe, but works by lowering testosterone and may cause "fatigue, headache, acne, decreased libido and mild erectile dysfunction."Female birth control prevents ovulation and thins the endometrial lining. It does not trick the body into believing it is pregnant. If it did so, you would experience symptoms of a phantom pregnancy - which is not what happens. It makes women not ovulate - as in, not release eggs, just as a woman in menopause does. It also impacts the lining of the uterus, preventing the thickening needed to implant and feed a fetus (if it were making them believe they're pregnant, it would thicken). A risk of b… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/19 07:51 PM |
| 1 | A new 'male birth control' pill might be safe, but works by lowering testosterone and may cause "fatigue, headache, acne, decreased libido and mild erectile dysfunction."They are no more certain than they are with women's BC, and they are just as major. I see no mention of increased likelihood of stroke for this either. Again: if you want to be outraged by this, you need to be outraged by women's BC too. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/19 07:31 PM |
| 1 | A new 'male birth control' pill might be safe, but works by lowering testosterone and may cause "fatigue, headache, acne, decreased libido and mild erectile dysfunction."Women's BC has similar side effects as well as concerns for increased blood clotting and stroke. Messing with women's hormones is also no joke and can have a ton of negative side effects too. They're equally stupid if you consider this stupid. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/19 10:36 PM |
| -1 | Why is being taken care of and provided for not seen as a privilege?female privilege of being unconditionally being taken care of and supported It's equivalent to ownership and comparable to saying a slave who is not permitted freedom has it good, because his master provides for him all of his needs (besides freedom) in expectation of some work (reproduction, domestic duties, sex, etc).It's not a voluntary thing for the slave or the woman (vs. it is a voluntary choice for the man or slave owner; he has the option to live without the dependent, or with them). I… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/19 04:35 PM |
| 1 | And they said they wanted “equality”I didn't say it was right; I rightly said it was gross and not OK in another comment. However, it isn't a prison-worthy offense. At most he would get a sex offender label if it were someone else's child. Being a sibling, it is more likely to be handled by the family without legal pursuit. Also, I don't see the media being dishonest only in one direction. I see conflicting statements from some being saying the media is being dishonest by saying she was 17 (making her look worse), while others say… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/19 06:00 PM |
| -1 | And they said they wanted “equality”No it doesn't. The two accounts here are not comparable at all. You are comparing someone who did some weird stuff with her younger sibling while 7 years old herself, and masturbated in bed as a teenager (still a minor) while her sister slept beside her. Cosby literally drugged, raped, and beat multiple women and minors. Do those sound similar enough to make the difference in treatment hypocritical? Use a better example if you wish to prove "the hypocrisy of the legal system and society"; this o… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/19 01:04 PM |
| 0 | And they said they wanted “equality”Bragging is a stretch. Talking openly about the weird things you did as a child with your sibling is not in itself bragging. And of course Cosby would not talk about the things he did; they were actually highly illegal and would have landed him in a lifetime of jail had he ever admitted to it prior to the accusations. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/19 01:02 PM |
| 2 | And they said they wanted “equality”Uhh.... did you even read? Cosby drugged, raped, beat, and assaulted both adult women and minors while an adult himself. A 7 yr old Dunham did sexual stuff with her sister, and masturbated while her sister slept as a teenager. Those are not comparable in any form. You are being absolutely ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/19 07:18 AM |
| 5 | And they said they wanted “equality”Dunham was 7 years old when she committed the "predatory acts" (luring the younger sister into touching her, kissing her, and spreading her vagina to look at it) detailed in her autobiography. She was 17 (aka still a minor; Cosby was an adult) at most when she masturbated in bed next to her sleeping sister (gross and not OK, but not in itself predatory). Cosby straight up assaulted women with allegations of date-rape drug use, physical battery/assault, and rape including some against minors whil… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/19 04:50 AM |
| 4 | And they said they wanted “equality”The account I was familiar with was with her actually luring her sister into kissing/touching her and looking at her sister's vagina when she herself was 7. Stuff that actually engaged the younger sister and would absolutely be predatory if she had been 17 then (that said: 17 is still a minor; Cosby was a legal adult). While it's not good to masturbate in bed next to your sleeping sibling, that is very, very different from actually assaulting, raping, beating, and drugging women and minors as … | /r/MensRights | 20/02/19 04:42 AM |
| 3 | And they said they wanted “equality”The account I was familiar with was with her actually luring her sister into kissing/touching her and looking at her sister's vagina when she herself was 7. Stuff that actually engaged the younger sister and would absolutely be predatory if she had been 17 then (that said: 17 is still a minor; Cosby was a legal adult). While it's not good to masturbate in bed next to your sleeping sibling, that is very, very different from actually assaulting, raping, beating, and drugging women and minors as Co… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/19 04:41 AM |
| -2 | And they said they wanted “equality”Plus the account that's gotten the "pedophile sister abuser" thing blown up over Lena Dunham took place when Lena Dunham was herself only seven years old. Cosby was a fully grown adult. eta: EVEN IN THE OTHER INSTANCE: Dunham was a teenager at the oldest--which is still a minor, and did not prey on her sister; she masturbated in her own bed while her sister slept beside her. This is not comparable to a person who beat, drugged, and raped multiple women and minors as a fully grown adult. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/19 10:48 PM |
| 2 | And they said they wanted “equality”Wasn't Lena Dunham also a child, like not even a teenager, herself when she did those things? Vs. Cosby was a full grown adult. eta: Yep. Checked. Dunham was 7 years old when the account in question happened. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/19 10:43 PM |
| -1 | Anyone else think the MR movement would immediately cease to exist if the US was involved in a ground war on our soil?I mean uh... Guns are pretty overpowering to your opponent regardless of if they're actually bodily stronger. Technology equalizes things quite a bit now until it devolves to straight up muscle mass dependent hand to hand combat. Some women roaming the streets with guns vs unarmed men living there would be quite terrifying and potentially fatal to the men despite the greater body strength. Bullets don't care. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/19 08:23 PM |
| 0 | Anyone else think the MR movement would immediately cease to exist if the US was involved in a ground war on our soil?How are you determining that? | /r/MensRights | 19/02/19 08:20 PM |
| 14 | Really think this should be seen. Let me know your thoughts!Sidebar for this sub: No posts about bannings by other moderators (too common, not relevant to topic of "rights") | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 05:10 AM |
| 1 | If it's a women's choice whether or not "her" child is aborted, shouldn't it also be a man's choice whether or not to pay for itrequire women to pay child support when they abort. Child support for.... what? There is no child to be supported in the case of abortion. Child support isn't a punishment. It's to be used to support the life it created. If there is no life to be supported, there is no need for it. It's trying to get someone to be responsible for that life, not a punishment. There is no means to equalize the reproductive aspect unless you can make men also become pregnant and have their body/life impacted by the… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/19 05:29 PM |
| 0 | If it's a women's choice whether or not "her" child is aborted, shouldn't it also be a man's choice whether or not to pay for itWhat was the purpose of this? Seems like a pro abortion thing, I didn't think that's what we were talking about. The purpose was to explain why abortion is a separate issue since you asserted it isn't. For men abortion is just "I don't have to pay child support" while for women it is a different thing; it means that (no financial responsibility) in addition to foregoing the burdens/risks of being pregnant and giving birth, which men do not have to deal with. But again if a woman files child supp… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/19 03:30 PM |
| 1 | If it's a women's choice whether or not "her" child is aborted, shouldn't it also be a man's choice whether or not to pay for itMen by default opt out of the burdens of pregnancy though, so it isn't as simple nor equivalent. It's a different issue in itself because men won't face the same bodily burden, risk of injury/death/lifelong disease, time spent essentially "sick", loss of livelihood, trauma/distress associated, etc. It's not just for opting out of parenthood. Currently the laws for just opting out of parenthood are the same for both men and women when it comes to a born child. Like I said before: the first post I… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/19 04:49 AM |
| 1 | If it's a women's choice whether or not "her" child is aborted, shouldn't it also be a man's choice whether or not to pay for itI had seen some stuff that seemed to suggest some cases where it also absolves of child support, but there were some additional hoops to jump through with that, I think; like if he signs his rights away to the stepfather, he is absolved, etc. I'm not sure if there's some other stuff that could also absolve. There shouldn't need to be another party to "take over" in place of either parent though. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/19 03:32 AM |
| 1 | If it's a women's choice whether or not "her" child is aborted, shouldn't it also be a man's choice whether or not to pay for itRe-read this entire thread. My initial post was describing what should be and my only critique was that abortion was a female-specific issue and instead the legal rights/parental responsibility issue is where the focus needs to be on. Not just on allowing fathers to relinquish a child to the mother, but on allowing both parties, including mothers, to do so since the burden of finances/raising the child is the same on either party (while pregnancy is unequally burdensome on women and decisions to… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/19 02:48 AM |
| 1 | If it's a women's choice whether or not "her" child is aborted, shouldn't it also be a man's choice whether or not to pay for itIn other words, the only time a father can do this is if the mother dies No, I know fathers can currently decide to sign away their rights to the mother (and the mother can sign away her rights to the child to the father as well). I had a friend recently have the girl he was with accidentally get pregnant, who did just that when she came to him asking if he wanted to do so; if he wanted to sign away his rights while she wanted to keep it herself. What I'm not sure about is if that legally absolv… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/19 02:22 AM |
| 1 | If it's a women's choice whether or not "her" child is aborted, shouldn't it also be a man's choice whether or not to pay for itIf the father is the sole person who has custody of the child, they can put the child up for adoption. A mother who is the sole person holding custody can do the same. What I meant was that both a single father and a single mother have the ability to give a child up for adoption. There should be no scenario where that right gets revoked just because someone else is involved. Parents can sign away their rights to the other party (or any eligible guardian) currently as well. I am not sure if there… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/19 01:46 AM |
| 0 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”and that is the problem with your thinking. You don't have to separate men from men. The reason there is a focus on separating men from men is because that is what is in question; separating women from men works and why the OP image exists at all. Again: that does not work for men. You keep making this about men vs women. You are repeating that over and over. You are wrong. I am repeating over and over that the solution of separating women from men works while that is not a viable solution for m… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/19 09:23 PM |
| 0 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”Why can't it be replicated for men..? As I have pointed out many, many times: because you cannot separate men from men, because they are men. then give men those special safe spots. The special safe spots are only safe because they do not have men. If you give them to men, they instantaneously become "unsafe spots". Do you understand this? Put them right next to the door, with the bright lights. This does not prevent the criminal males from taking those spots. The point I have been saying over a… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/19 08:22 PM |
| 4 | If it's a women's choice whether or not "her" child is aborted, shouldn't it also be a man's choice whether or not to pay for itThe abortion point is unique to women though, so should probably be left out due to men not being able to have abortions and the actual abortive process and pregnancy being potentially traumatic to the woman in a way no male will ever endure (so the decision doesn't really impact him in the same manner). However, both parties have the ability to put the child up for adoption/forfeit custody. As such, if the woman says "I want the child" and the man says "I don't" after it's born I don't see how … | /r/MensRights | 15/02/19 07:57 PM |
| 0 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”I disagree. You haven't addressed the points I have just said either; just taken to something akin to an insult in lieu of a critique. The fact still stands that this produces a net increase to safety that cannot be replicated for men due to the statistical fact of who is committing the crimes. To equalize it and make this protection system ineffective you would need to make females commit more crimes, or males commit fewer crimes. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/19 07:07 PM |
| 0 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”The solution to protecting victims of violence is not to protect just female victims of violence. You cannot protect male victims in the same way you can protect female victims. You cannot protect cervical cancer victims the same way you protect bone cancer victims. This parking sign was probably the cheap, "virtue-signaling" method of giving the appearance of attempting to solve a problem without actually investing any significant money on the part of the building owners. It does solve a proble… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/19 06:44 PM |
| 0 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”You disregard male victims because they are attacked by other males? I am not disregarding them. I am saying the solution that works for women, is not a viable solution for men. A solution for men should be found, but again: the one that works for women, does not work for men. Men are equal to women. We also deserve protections in society. We would like safe parking garages for everyone, not just women. Men also deserve to be safe from violence. I agree, but again: the solution that works for wo… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/19 05:48 PM |
| 6 | No boys allowed in an all female Boy Scout groupIt goes both ways: For decades there have been Scouting programs in other countries for boys and girls together, but the Boy Scouts program here remains single gender, chartering only all-boys troops or all-girls troops. From OP's link. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 11:21 PM |
| 0 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”I explained the practical point already. I have no desire to engage with you further. You can re-read the comments. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 10:30 PM |
| 0 | I feel like there's something missing...Yeah, because that's what the person chose to illustrate. There are other copies that feature a single man and child on the cover with no mom in sight and plenty more with a male/female couple. The OP is framed to feed a certain viewpoint to the audience. I could take https://i.imgur.com/CgIRKbr.jpg and claim the magazine doesn't feature enough women and post it to r/feminism or something just as easily. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 10:20 PM |
| 2 | I feel like there's something missing...I feel like there's something missing https://i.imgur.com/CgIRKbr.jpg You mean the many, many other copies of this magazine? It's very easy to pick and choose... | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 10:09 PM |
| 0 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”Ok... but that's irrelevant. There is no easy way to separate men from other men, because they are men; I already explained that. There is a very easy way to separate women from the group most likely to assault them. That is all it boils down to. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 09:49 PM |
| -1 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”It isn't an ideal solution, but I do see this existing as better than it not existing; it does more good than harm. Men aren't being deprived of a parking garage by allotting a corner to women. The two have different needs. Bras are not sold in the men's section but no one claims its discrimination due to them being marketed to women only, because (most) men don't need them. Men don't need men's only parking garages because, like most men not having breasts and no need for bras, most men are not… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 08:32 PM |
| 0 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”No equivalent male parking to the pregnant women parking spaces, though. The practical reason behind the female-only parking area doesn't apply to men, also. There is no significant need to protect them from female assailants in a shady parking garage. There is a need to protect them from other male assailants, but that's a bit tricky unless you want to ban both the victims and the assailants at the same time by banning all men. Again, I don't think it should be a satisfactory permanent solution… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 07:45 PM |
| -7 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”Men are actually more likely to be attacked in a parking garage than women, by a large margin. Yes, by other men. Unless you bar all people from the parking garage and render it useless, there isn't a way to say "hey, these are the likely perpetrators of the violence" because the primary victims are also the perpetrators in the male/female divide. Like I said I don't think it's a good solution, but it is a practical one. Men are also attacked by other men too, not just by women. Do you feel that… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 07:40 PM |
| -4 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”Like I said, I do not think it is an ideal solution. But seeing a man in the women's section will send off alarm bells specifically for the reason you mentioned; it will make them think "he is clearly here to target women", and give them the opportunity to put their guard up, vs. "oh he's just a dude going to his car, normal harmless guy, it's fine to be distracted by my phone and walk slowly" etc. Women are accessible everywhere, also. It gives him a single point to focus on, but it's hardly di… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 07:23 PM |
| 1 | Men under 33 are useless? According to JLo of all people.That didn't look like she was looking at their ability to buy nice things for them, only asserting that with the self-esteem boost, reduction of stress that comes with being financially stable, etc. they become more overall balanced and able to act as a mature, stable adult. "It can take men into their early 30s to establish their professional career and feel a sense of financial stability, which helps them feel more secure in life," Greer told INSIDER. "As a result, this can give them the mat… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 07:18 PM |
| 1 | Old views about stay-at-home dads die hardDads get a lot of "what a great dad!" stuff when they do nearly anything childcare related that is just background noise when a woman does it. (Barring any assumptions of him being a child predator, anyway; if there's confident he's actually Dad.) Single dads get a lot less scorn than single moms and so on, for instance. It would vary depending on who is the person judging them and I have a feeling men would be more critical of a stay-at-home dad than women would be. It's definitely not OK to ha… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 06:48 PM |
| 3 | Speaking the truthI'm more like this for my boyfriend than he is for me; I have to have him and am the one that swears loyalty when he flakes. I would attribute it to individual disposition. He is less inclined for the drive to commitment than I am. You can see similar commitment and drive level examples in how we approach jobs, deadlines, promises, etc. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 06:23 PM |
| -7 | Imagine the backlash if this said “Men’s Parking”It's done because parking garages are a common point of attack for women who are generally smaller and weaker than a male attacker who wishes to rape them. Men are much less likely to be followed by a "normal" looking woman in a desolate parking garage who feigns going to her own car and "acts normal" to blend in, then physically overpowered and harmed by the attacker that previously seemed like a normal, nondangerous person. It could happen, yes, but the epidemic in these locations is with wome… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/19 05:57 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter