TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

saltedpecker Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by saltedpecker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Men get to vote without signing up for the draft.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 06:36 PM
1

That's why I linked an entire book about it too. But I guess you don't accept that either. More basic stuff: your comment isn't truth a book. It's just your opinion. I'm not finding the meaning of life, wtf are you talking about? We're talking about feminism, a simple term with a definition.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:05 PM
1

We both don't have any evidence anyway so we're both just bullshit
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:04 PM
1

And every other one. Like this one https://www.dictionary.com/browse/feminism 2-0 for me
/r/MensRights04/07/21 08:43 AM
1

Where people bought slaves but didn't abuse them and let them live in the family. What's your evidence?
/r/MensRights04/07/21 08:42 AM
1

In some places, yes. The majority of women were not against voting either if you look 3 years later. The majority of women weren't against abortion. The majority of women weren't against equal pay.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 07:39 AM
1

Dictionary agrees with me anyway.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 07:38 AM
1

They did look through the female lens. That doesn't mean doing what the majority wanted, like you think. The majority of people were also against abolishing slavery, but I bet you're glad people fought for that anyway.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 07:25 AM
1

Me source, you none
/r/MensRights04/07/21 07:23 AM
1

Things like women not being able to vote, having equal opportunities and pay, right to abortion, etc. Are all things were women were less than men. So to achieve equality, you first need to look through the female lens to see these issues. If you only look at men how can you ever get men and women to be equal?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 11:22 AM
1

I actually have a source. You're the one just spewing your opinion as if it were fact. Read a book, ignoramus. https://books.google.nl/books?id=Dz4wU64f_JYC&q=feminism+%22principle+that+women+are+human+beings+equal+to+men%22&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=feminism%20%22principle%20that%20women%20are%20human%20beings%20equal%20to%20men%22&f=false
/r/MensRights02/07/21 08:12 AM
1

Here, read some of this https://books.google.nl/books?id=Dz4wU64f_JYC&q=feminism+%22principle+that+women+are+human+beings+equal+to+men%22&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=feminism%20%22principle%20that%20women%20are%20human%20beings%20equal%20to%20men%22&f=false
/r/MensRights02/07/21 08:11 AM
1

Nah.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 08:10 AM
1

Nah
/r/MensRights02/07/21 08:10 AM
0

Nah, just because you think that doesn't make it true. Read a book.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 07:58 AM
0

Nah.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 06:37 PM
-1

No, feminism about women being equal to men. Here's a real source: https://books.google.nl/books?id=Dz4wU64f_JYC&q=feminism+%22principle+that+women+are+human+beings+equal+to+men%22&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=feminism%20%22principle%20that%20women%20are%20human%20beings%20equal%20to%20men%22&f=false
/r/MensRights01/07/21 05:03 PM
0

Exactly. Sadly so many people like OP get confused by it
/r/MensRights01/07/21 05:01 PM
1

Search reddit for "feminism". Lots of discussion on subreddits like TwoXChromosomes, WomenOver30 and even Memes. Or TERFS and the disapproval of them. Here is a great read on the issue: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47006912.amp And another: https://www.routledge.com/Repudiating-Feminism-Young-Women-in-a-Neoliberal-World/Scharff/p/book/9781409410300
/r/MensRights01/07/21 09:02 AM
1

Don't let yourself get distracted by a vocal minority. Only focusing on this makes it seem like that's all there is, but obviously you're only focusing on a small part of the movement and that's not representative at all. There's also plenty of speaking out against them.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 08:11 AM
1

Take a history class
/r/MensRights01/07/21 06:55 AM
0

No it wasn't.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 06:37 AM
-5

Like this "all feminist are about hate". This post is stupid. Feminism always was and is about equality. OP let himself be blinded by the bad apples. Sad.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 06:36 AM
1

Feminism always was an equality movement. Just because in the last few years some people have used it to mean hate doesn't mean the entire concept is now that.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 06:35 AM
-3

Wtf is this bullshit?? It doesn't even belong on this sub. This has nothing to do with her being a woman. Also, she's right. Shame on you OP for posting this here. On and the 'hotdog down a hallway' thing isn't even true. Vaginas don't get wider if they had more or larger cocks. If it feels like that it's because your hotdog is small, not because of the hallway.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/20 02:50 PM
2

Keto is unnecessary. I tried it, you only feel shit for the first weeks. I don't understand why you would choose a diet that makes you feel shit, even if it changes afterwards. You can be perfectly healthy while eating carbs, and there is so much more to health and feeling good than just diet. Exercising, sleeping properly and drinkin enough water. You will feel great if you do that and don't eat keto.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/18 10:22 AM
2

I feel like that anger feeling I had that kept me on my toes has dropped significantly. That anger feeling? So you got less angry? What else changed in your diet, did you maybe start drinking more or just eating less in general? You can get plenty of protein without eggs, and if you like yoghurt a lot there are non-dairy yoghurts.
/r/askTRP19/05/18 04:38 PM
4

Now you see you're wrong you suddenly claim it doesn't matter? Lol, classic. You claimed "toxicity is determined by the amount" was stupid. You were wrong. Everything can be toxic. It's okay to be wrong though, don't worry. Just don't be a dick about it. ;)
/r/TheRedPill16/04/18 03:39 PM
3

No. Completely wrong. Read this first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_intoxication then talk. No wonder your posts are so bad.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/18 03:31 PM
1

One droplet of alcohol won't have any effect on a pregnant mother or their baby. It's a tiny amount, but it's still a safe quantity. Not saying that's healthy moderation, obviously just don't drink alcohol if you're pregnant.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/18 03:02 PM
2

Carbs and sugar are not toxic in normal amounts, just like water isn't toxic. However, all three of those things can be lethal in high enough dose. Thus, toxicity is dose-dependent.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/18 10:53 AM
2

No, you don't know anything about toxicity if you disagree with this. If your body can deal with a small dose, that means it isn't toxic. The entire concept of toxicity is that it is dose-dependent. "The dose makes the poison".
/r/TheRedPill16/04/18 10:32 AM
3

CICO has not been disproven, if you think that you have the wrong understanding of it.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/18 09:41 AM
3

Literally nothing is inherently toxic or bad though. Toxicity is determined by the amount.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/18 09:39 AM
1

Yeah, absolutely nothing you said was even remotely true lol. Have you seen www.greatveganathletes.com? Have you seen /r/veganfitness? Or this: https://www.plantbasednews.org/post/62-year-old-vegan-athlete-smashes-world-records-protein-myth? You really don't need animal products to be a world-class athlete at all. And do you seriously call all these health organizations "BIASED as hell"? https://www.reddit.com/r/vegan/wiki/dieteticorgs The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics? The British Nutritio…
/r/askTRP12/03/18 01:53 PM
7

Classic narcissist personality disorder. That's your imagination, not reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/18 09:10 AM
9

I asked a simple question, and you can't even answer it. Shows who's actually doing the mental gymnastics here. Do you think you're never wrong about women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/18 12:57 AM
6

That makes even less sense. So what about a woman who does not enjoy it? What if they don't want to have sex with you even though you think they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/18 12:36 AM
10

It says that women who are not broken will enjoy this kind of sex. That's just retarded. So everyone who does not enjoy that kind of sex is broken?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/18 12:30 AM
2

Found the salty insecure troll.
/r/askTRP10/03/18 11:08 AM
1

Going vegan is better for your health and the planet. If you actually know the facts and can reason you'll see that.
/r/askTRP10/03/18 09:11 AM
3

This is so beta insecure holy shit man
/r/askTRP10/03/18 09:10 AM
2

Is RP using illogical arguments to reach a false conclusion? You make an appeal to nature, that's not valid reasoning.
/r/askTRP10/03/18 09:10 AM
10

Vegan diets generally do actually have very little sugar. You can drink a ton of soft drinks of course, but a vegan diet doesn't necessarily have more sugar than a non-vegan diet. Starch is quite abundant, but that doesn't really cause a lot of problems with high blood pressure/diabetes. Unless you eat an absolute fuckton of it, but again, normal diets don't have this issue.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 02:21 PM
1

And not eating meat is as natural as taking a leak.
/r/askTRP14/11/17 09:37 AM
1

So you agree that what animals do is irrelevant? Then why do you say you need meat because it's natural? Simple fact is that you don't need meat at all.
/r/askTRP14/11/17 01:57 AM
1

In nature animals don't cook their meat, do they? So shouldn't you only eat raw meat, according to your own logic.
/r/askTRP14/11/17 01:51 AM
1

You haven't linked or quoted anything at all. You have no proof. You're wrong mate.
/r/askTRP14/11/17 12:56 AM
1

What about those? B12 supplements contain only B12. Overusing anything is bad for you indeed, so that's why you simply don't take too many supplements. No issue there at all. Who recommends to get all nutrients from food sources? Supplements are definitely recommend if you need them. No issue with them at all. Meat is not an essential part of a well balanced diet. I posted proof for this. Do you have any proof for your claim? If not please stop bullshitting, thanks.
/r/askTRP14/11/17 12:25 AM
1

First of all, no nutritionist will ever say that meat is essential to a diet. Either you or they are lying if they say that. Proof from multiple official statements. The only nutrient that's unique to animal products is B12, and as you said supplements can easily be taken. It's not 'extremely difficult' to buy and take these at all. ;) Also, a lot of non-vegans have (too) low B12 levels as well, and need supplements as well. Animal products make it a little easier to get all nutrients, but if yo…
/r/askTRP14/11/17 12:02 AM
1

Then you haven't met a lot of nutritionists have you? A well rounded diet doesn't need meat or animal products at all, as any proper nutritionist would agree.
/r/askTRP13/11/17 11:41 PM
4

or you can try and communicate like a normal human being normal human being There's your mistake, you assumed there are actual normal human beings subscribed to this sub, instead of fat antisocial 20-something keyboard warriors that still live in their moms basement and never leave the house more than once a week.
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 03:39 PM
1

Depends on what you mean with feminism.
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 03:37 PM
1

No, I do. You're wrong, it's clearly possible to have a good enough indication of how an animal feels. Of course it will never be 100%, but if you kick a dog you clearly see it's hurt. If you stab a cow you clearly see it's hurt. If you keep a cow enclosed in tight areas you clearly see it's not happy. Disagree on which part? Everything I said ia factual, not much to disagree on. The only variable here is the amount of empathy.
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 02:20 PM
2

You accuse me of accusing you, but then later you accuse me of not having empathy. Not only is that a lie, it makes you hypocritical. You don't have to be a scientist to know how an animal feels. You can see and hear more than enough to get a good idea. We agree that they can suffer, and we also agree that you don't need to kill them. Hence, if you care about animals you won't kill them, let alone buy their meat from the supermarket.
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 02:05 PM
1

Okay, you clearly lack any form of empathy towards animas. If you're that psychotically insane of course you won't understand a logical argument based on empathy. It's scientifically proven that animals are sentient and can feel, no projecting going on at all here. You're simply unaware of this apparently, or refuse to accept it.
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 01:45 PM
1

Animals have feelings, they can hurt and suffer. You wouldn't kick a dog or strangle a cat, would you? No, because that is cruel and psychopathic. So why would you be responsible for a cow suffering? Your plant "argument" is bullshit. Animals can feel, plants cannot. Even if you would be right, by eating animals you're responsible for more plant death, since the animals are fed plants. So going vegetarian/vegan is better.
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 01:32 PM
1

Most vegans do it for the animals, not health. That's not to say there aren't clear health benefits as well. How is anyone "brainwashed" into going vegetarian/vegan?? That's ridiculous lol. Red and processed meat is scientifically proven to be bad for you, and classified as carcinogenic. What people did in the past is irrelevant. We don't need to kill, so why would we?
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 12:57 PM
1

Except most commercial honey production is more harmful than beneficial to the bees. Also no milk and no eggs isn't bad at all. You can still make cakes and everything else without using milk or eggs. Vegan? Not stupid at all.
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 12:39 PM
1

Simple fact is that you don't need meat and animal products these days. If you care about animals, why would you not stop consuming them?
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 12:33 PM
2

>gets called out >NUH-UH I CAN'T BE WRONG YOU'RE A LOONIE
/r/TheRedPill13/10/17 05:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter