TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sammythemc Archive

View 1 post and 54 comments by sammythemc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Isn't that what it defaults to though? If you assume eg Depp is innocent until proven guilty, isn't that just assuming Heard is lying until proven innocent?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/22 03:41 PM
1

You don't just ruin some guy's life just because of statistics. Should we default to assuming the woman is lying and ruining her life instead?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/22 01:43 PM
-15

I came in from r/all and this post and these comments are something else. Using a war as an excuse to work out your weird misogyny, truly pathetic
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/22 10:47 PM
1

Yeah the people who really care about the environment are the ones who call climate activists obnoxious narcissists
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 06:38 PM
-13

Lol still can't believe people believe this bullshit
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/19 11:38 PM
0

Good
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:41 PM
-8

It's ironic because the headline itself pushes a narrative that men's issues don't get the attention they deserve because of selfish, censorious feminists. There are any number of reasons this could have been removed, including the (some might say suspiciously high) vote count, but this is the one that was settled on.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 02:50 AM
-20

...Are you? Look at that headline again and tell me you don't see the irony in complaining about pushing narratives here.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 10:19 PM
-2

That's an interesting interpretation, but no, by "justice" I mean actual rapists facing punishment.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:18 AM
0

muh observation
/r/MensRights25/12/17 05:26 PM
-1

This isn't anything like the civil rights movement That's your interpretation, but in terms of rffecting change via the media rather than police it's absolutely like that.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 04:38 PM
-3

Wow, you're an actual imbecile. You're literally advocating for innocent men having their lives ruined so some few more can be prosecuted? The status quo already leads to innocent people's lives being ruined by rape and the social fallout of reporting. Why are you so comfortable writing them off?
/r/MensRights25/12/17 03:05 PM
-1

There were plenty of segregationists who complained about how "disruptive" civil rights leaders were too. If it leads to fewer people being raped, it's probably a positive thing.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 02:22 PM
2

The topic revolves around "pre-crime". You will get no help from most everyone and anyone if you make an assertion about another person without evidence. What if the assertion is "nah she's lying, never happened"
/r/MensRights25/12/17 02:05 PM
-5

Not sure what you're laughing at, this was the exact strategy of the civil rights movement
/r/MensRights25/12/17 02:03 PM
-3

I'm sorry if it's not palatable, but that's the genesis of the metoo stuff. If you don't like it, strike at the root of the problem.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 10:17 AM
6

Best is a very subjective term. The "best" way in my opinion is the way that doesn't skirt due process and isn't ripe for abuse. Are you implying the current system isn't ripe for abuse? What about all the people getting away with rape?
/r/MensRights25/12/17 10:06 AM
-2

.... You say that like it's a good thing. Go to the press because they don't care that there's no evidence proving it happened. Maybe it did, maybe it didn't, but if there is no evidence to prove it happened we simply must assume innocence It's a bad thing, but it's an inevitable bad thing in the absence of more legitimized ways to get justice. If you want people to stop telling the newspapers and go to the cops, you're going to have to fix how the cops deal with this stuff.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 10:00 AM
-11

If she has no proof that he said those things it's pretty tricky for the police to do anything Which is why women go to the press instead. Our justice system is inadequate at prosecuting something that generally happens behind closed doors, leaves little physical evidence and is only a crime when certain intangible conditions aren't met. Manson's quote doesn't seem to acknowledge this.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 09:31 AM
1

Your post was fucking pathetic, you very clearly said that we need to hear how important it is that you, very specifically you, not any monolithic divine 'minority', experience less privilege than average. That's quite a few paragraphs for a diametrically opposite reading of what I was trying to say
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:19 AM
1

You're right, I should be like our much beloved president and stop giving a fuck about other people's feelings and experiences
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:09 AM
-5

Because only you experience it, right? Everyone has to deal with that at some point or another. I experience it a lot less than most people, which is why it's important to hear about it
/r/MensRights15/10/17 10:04 PM
-7

Imagine how tired you'd be if you had to actually experience it rather than just hear people talk about it
/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:50 PM
1

Who gives a shit? For a bunch of guys in a thread supposedly celebrating an "I wouldn't want to get with you anyway" slam, y'all seem really concerned about her thinking you're hot
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 09:28 PM
2

Not sure where this bitch gets off expressing a preference like that, pussy pass denied
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 09:25 PM
1

Not for me. I'm a pretty staunch feminist, and I'm not so into this. Like, I feel like I'm supposed to think the girl has some good reason to be unafraid of this huge snarling bull, but the whole situation just reminds me of police lines clearing out Occupy camps.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 06:46 PM
3

As far as I know the preferred phrasing is "intimate partner violence" in part because of concerns like that. I remember a specific time hearing boyfriend/girlfriend violence referred to as "domestic violence" and thinking it was weird because they weren't married or cohabitating, but that's a silly boundary to put around it.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 05:55 PM
4

That's not free speech you contrarian fuck. That is a threat. I should be able to say anything until someone or something is directly threatened with violence. Seems kind of arbitrary. It's still a limitation on speech.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:20 PM
2

Dude, people can't just call jailsies on you. Like, seriously, take a look at what you just responded with. You're really willing to let a kid drown over a misunderstanding that got cleared up in a half hour because (in this guy's mind) it could have gone differently?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:24 PM
6

Outside of drowning myself, can you explain how helping a drowning kid would lead to harm to my own child? Your argument seems to skip that bit and go straight to bashing this guy for saying he'd want to save a life, it comes across as really bizarre.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:25 AM
3

Of course not. I don't even really want to punish the ones responsible for what amounts to a stupid internet stunt, I just want them to understand that this was a bad idea.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:22 AM
18

So your blog doesn't support it, great! I'm glad you didn't get swept up in the furor. Except, how does that excuse the people who need to read and understand this backlash, ie all the other people who did respond to the call-to-arms?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:34 PM
1

A couple of days late, but atheism shouldn't be any kind of tent, it should be the outdoors. I'm a fairly radical feminist and pretty anti-MRM generally, hell, I'm not even an atheist really, but I don't really see what the feminism/MRM friction has to do with atheism. They're just on different axes. It seems silly for atheism+ to put atheism at the forefront when it seems that atheism isn't the source of their beliefs but just another plank in a much broader platform. Unless I'm not getting som…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 12:31 AM
9

I think it's kind of off to say it's "certain users" that got this listed. Yeah, some of the more egregious stuff is anecdotal and the result of a few jerks, but that's kind of like saying "What, I don't want to lynch anyone, I just think we must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children." They call out the movement as a whole, because the "moderates" tolerate the extremists because outside this little bubble, the moderates are extremists.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:25 AM
1

It not being technically CP is debatable, and the "I could have sex with these girls" argument doesn't hold a lot of water. There's a reason that the age limit for appearing in pornography is higher than the age of consent. Consenting to engage in discrete sex acts is wayyy less abstract than consenting to being a part of pornography, which is reproducible and will probably follow you around much longer. I do agree with your larger point though. There's a pretty huge gulf between banning legitim…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:48 PM
3

Well my issue is that on the one hand they're ascribed a lot of power in terms of controlling the cultural narrative, but on the other you're claiming that you're just exposing them to the judgment of that cultural narrative. Most non-MRAs aren't going to care that someone is outed as a radical feminist, so from my angle all this seems to be more about exposing them to the MRM than exposing them to the world.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 02:37 AM
4

Thanks for actually answering my question, I was just getting downvotes without explanation. Also, thanks for making it clear (to me and to other, more sympathetic people) that you were not calling for violence. Personally, I think fucking with someone's job is a bit much, but that's better than what I thought was going on.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 12:17 AM
1

"Return"?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 11:07 PM
9

Just to be clear, what is the "it" that you're referring to here? How do you specifically intend to hold them responsible for hate speech? Because the way it's written, it could be interpreted as a call for offline harassment or even violence.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 11:04 PM
1

It still seems a little disingenuous, you'd need asperger's to interpret it correctly. When I hear "she took 70% of his money in the divorce" I'm thinking the guy's net worth is 30% of what it was yesterday, and I know I'm not alone there. Considering the likely financial situation of someone like Hogan, who made most of his money a while ago, this might not be nearly as unfair as it seems. I can see him being fairly cash poor with most of his 80s money being tied up in investments like his hous…
/r/MensRights23/11/11 11:17 PM
7

its just that despite what you learned watching Will and Grace, many gay men are promiscuous and very often use drugs And a happy LGBT month to you too!
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:09 PM
2

Why does it need to be... BY GOVERNMENT? Isn't the point of the government's "discrimination" against men to counteract the non-legal discrimination faced by women?
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:49 AM
2

What governmental discrimination are you referring to?
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:27 AM
5

You see it in the news a lot Might this say something about news coverage instead of the plight of the white man? There's no white scholarships Yes there are, they're just from foundations like "The Irish-American Society" or "The Polish Alliance." There are also many, many need-based scholarships which white people can qualify for. White students are actually more likely to receive scholarships in California. Maybe i can start a white rights subreddit, I can see it having as much controversy as…
/r/MensRights21/09/11 03:04 AM
1

If you're both really drunk, it's still probably a good idea not to have sex at all, which is all I was saying.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 09:52 PM
4

If you don't want to be held accountable for acting a fool while black out drunk, don't get black out drunk. That's how it works in the real world. I don't know what else to tell you. :( If you don't want to be held accountable for raping someone, don't sleep with them while they're drunk. That's how it works in the real world. I don't know what else to tell you.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 11:56 PM
2

It's frustrating to be evaluated by your gender and not your actual individual achievements. Whether the evaluation is positive or negative doesn't really matter when it's not about what you've actually done.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 11:37 PM
5

I noticed that you're now merely repeated your previous silly excuses for why it's okay to deceive someone about one's intrinsic sex. This kind of begs the question, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights12/09/11 09:13 PM
8

Trust me, more than one person at a time can think that's a little nuts.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 09:52 PM
14

Because obviously 3 whole people can't think your views are horrible.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:19 PM
1

The polls start off as corrupt. They're completely non-scientific and invite this kind of meddling. Still, mobilizing a group with a clear agenda to vote in a poll definitely skews the results. It's like when freep posters "freep that poll" and then pat themselves on the backs because their most important issue shows up as the most important issue of the internet.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 12:07 AM
9

Wow dude... You sound pretty unhinged. You accuse them of having an anti-male bias and then talk about how they're like Nazis and trying to sap your precious bodily fluids. Get a grip.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 01:33 PM
2

TL;DR: He sucker punched a girl trying to hit on him
/r/MensRights05/05/10 11:01 AM
5

Upvoted for correct usage of Joseph Campbell
/r/MensRights17/08/09 06:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter