TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sanelity Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by sanelity on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

Might even be a cost saver. Add up how much you spend pursuing women for no guaranteed gain, and it'll probably be a bargain.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 09:18 PM
1

Depends on your career aspirations. If a degree is required for your preferred career path, than you have no choice. The key for men in university today is to minimize the risk that comes with college women. All of the "rape culture" hysteria has made campuses a hostile environment for men, so minimize your risks. As other have said, avoid your coeds. Focus on your goals. You went to college to get a degree, not a notch count. Don't let a drunken hookup derail your future career before you enter…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:26 PM
5

Looks like another case of our "strong independent women" actually being "poor little waifs with no agency". Afraid of the event? Do. Not. Attend. Why is that so hard? Does it need to be translated into femspeak?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:43 PM
5

Historically, when it comes to action and control of the narrative, the majority were irrelevant. The squeky wheel gets the grease.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:38 PM
1

Your very example of GYOW and NOT dating women is no different than lesbianism in end result. Both are "attacks on the family". You have stated you have no desire to create a family, yet you look down on others who also aren't creating a family. Looks like you want to have your cake and eat it too, just like the feminists. Or is "destroying the family" not your real reason for hating lesbianism?
/r/MGTOW10/02/15 05:56 PM
7

MGTOW != shunning women. At its core, MGTOW is about personal choice and empowerment. You can be MGTOW and still date women on your own terms. For more attraction/betterment advice I suggest you check out TheRedPill subreddit.
/r/MGTOW10/02/15 05:49 PM
1

Short bit of satire. Very close to actual truth though, if you listen what feminists claim women want.
/r/MGTOW10/02/15 05:45 PM
2

Good post. Question though. Do you enjoy achieving your goals? Is the issue that you are not having fun, or that you are no longer fun to be around?
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 01:20 AM
2

It would've been more accurate to have men of similar SMV doing the ogling.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:03 AM
1

But where to go? Hillsdale?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:46 AM
1

Exactly. Also, that level of ambiguity does not belong in a text book.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:45 AM
2

I saw those on another website and have finished 2 posts in my 6 part series dissecting them. Here's Part 1 TL;DR, most of them are whines about perceived female experiences. And most of the people setting role expectations are other women. Lots of redundancy too.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:44 AM
2

Well done!
/r/MGTOW06/02/15 12:34 AM
1

Well said. Simple math.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:06 AM
1

Still true today. Even more so with #YesMeansYes
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:53 AM
1

Of course the fraternities (in general) were silent. Had they even attempted to speak up, they would have been labelled rape apologists. In spite of Emma Watson and her "He for She, and She for She" campaign, men aren't allowed to speak about women's issues unless they are repeating the feminist talking points. Even then they are likely to be silenced because "they haven't lived the female experience". And the accused fraternity DID speak up. They were quick to point out the fallacies in the Rol…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:28 AM
1

I thought fish didn't need bicycles?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:20 AM
2

Gender is natural. If it weren't, we wouldn't have a binary gender structure as our core biology. That said, our super-duper education indoctrination system has certainly done a great job of socializing people away from their natural gender.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:02 AM
1

I was actually hoping the frat houses just stopped inviting women as defense against false charges Agree. Men need to call the feminists' bluff by protecting the poor girls from association with the "rapey men".
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:49 AM
1

They weren't exactly coming to the frat's defense before the rape hoax blew up, did they? I certainly don't recall any news about sororities being vocal about frat parties being safe. They are always quite willing to play the victim card, just like they are doing now. They are complicit in the rape culture hysteria by virtue of their silence. Since they agree they need protection from the men on campus, they shouldn't complain now that they are getting what they asked for.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:47 AM
1

"ongoing struggle of women wanting to infiltrate male spaces" Hmm, that looks familiar.
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 04:38 AM
1

Let's flip that. How about the frats take the lead and stop inviting women to parties, "for their safety". Instead, let the sororities host (and pay for) the parties and invite the men.
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 04:36 AM
1

Fraternities should follow up on this and make a statement by banning ALL female guests "for their own safety". Until such time as schools stop accusing frats of being rape dens, frats should give the schools what they want and just stop allowing women to enter the building altogether. Let the girls host the parties for a change and invite the men over.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:16 PM
1

Looks like fun. I'm game. I see a lot of the usual MRAs and PUAs are already tweeting.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:11 PM
0

This just demonstrates one of the axioms of feminism: issues affecting men can only be discussed if they can be framed as harming women. Issues that only affect men should not be given any media attention.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:48 PM
1

I could only watch the first 3 minutes. It was standard shaming language, nothing to see here. No real refutation of points, just shaming for the choice of words the "MGTOW" used.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:45 PM
3

They should be thankful. Having been told over and over that frat parties are rape-fests, why would they even want to willingly go to one? Sorry ladies, you don't get to "have your cake and eat it too". Either the frats are dangerous places for women or they're not. Make up your mind.
/r/MGTOW30/01/15 07:30 PM
1

I noticed that too. Instead of responding to the points made by the "happily single" men, they just went straight to shaming mode.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 06:26 PM
2

Women always seem to have a long list of what a man is responsible for bringing to the relationship, but when you ask what a man can expect them to bring to the relationship they call you a misogynist that just wants to bring back the oppressive patriarchal 50s.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 06:24 PM
2

"When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be twenty-one, I was astonished by how much he'd learned in seven years.” Mark Twain
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 05:55 PM
1

It seems the UK really hates heterosexual relationships. Between this and their adopting the YesMeansYes affirmative consent standard, they are steadily increasing the pressure on men to avoid women. Short term feminist political gain now, marital and demographic destruction later.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 05:39 PM
1

Besides, since Christmas is a Federal holiday, religion is not a reason to get that day off. How many of these female graduates go on to a government job? Are they willing to "check their privilege" by eliminating Christmas as a holiday?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:26 PM
2

Whenever I see these things about privilege or male oppression, I wish I could ask the person victim posting them "What's your point?" Being male, I tend to focus on actions, not words. So my question, is always "what do you want to happen?". They rarely think about what actions their words might result in. Usually the response is they want you to feel something or "recognize" your privilege. Okay, then what? Be careful ladies, you just might get what you are unintentionally asking for: being ig…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:21 PM
1

I'm always glad to see the issue of the collegiate gender gap get some public attention. Unfortunately, it usually only gets mainstream attention if the lower male attendance rates can be shown to disadvantage women. Typically along the lines of "who will these educated women marry?" Be thankful the UK hasn't yet adopted the American #YesMeansYes affirmative consent requirements yet. I believe that will discourage even more men from enrolling in universities.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:04 AM
2

High pre-marital N count (in women) correlates to increased divorce risk. So it might be a double standard for a high N man to refuse to commit to a high N woman, but it is a rational reduction of divorce risk to do so. It is just another example of the difference between SMV and MMV.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 06:05 PM
7

Good for you. The downside is that you now have an enemy for a neighbor. Chances are good that she WILL reciprocate in some fashion for your failure to comply. I recently had my back yard fence replaced. Before the work started I asked my neighbors on each side to contribute half of the cost of our shared fences. One said "no problem" and agreed to half. The other neighbor said he could only afford $300 (his share was actually about $750). I told him he didn't have to pay it all at once, I was p…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 05:33 PM
21

I thought fish didn't need bicycles. And when men do attempt to speak on women's issues they are promptly shut down because they "don't have the lived experiences" of a woman. Feminism's new slogan: "He for She and She for She".
/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:24 PM
2

Proving that politicians don't actually care about justice or fairness, they just want to take advantage of any person that could advance their agenda.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:15 AM
1

Good critique of feminist elites. Modern feminism is about power and success for the upper-middle class, privileged white women. Those poor women in the lower classes are just pawns to be used to ensure the upper classes get what they want.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:09 AM
3

From the article (emphasis mine): "Another worrying statistic was the increasing number of young men with little or no interest in sex, a group known as "herbivores" in Japan. More than 20 per cent of men aged between 25 and 29 expressed little of in interest in sex. The population of Japan currently stands at 126.6 million, although 25 per cent of that total are aged 65 or older, an increase of 1.12 million people on the fiscal 2012 figure. Equally, the fertility rate of 1.41 babies per woman d…
/r/MGTOW21/01/15 06:05 AM
5

I think Aaron consumed a bit too much of his Rumpleminze in the creation of that post.
/r/MGTOW21/01/15 12:53 AM
0

Currently I don't think it is affecting the privileged white women much. If anything, MGTOW is just moving the needle on the 80/20 rule. In other words, the high SMV/MMV pool is shrinking for both genders and more of the rest are just giving up. Where we might be making progress is in turning some blue-pill guys to TRP, but that doesn't necessarily put them in the higher SMV bracket. We are just re-arranging the subcategories in the non-alpha cohort.
/r/MGTOW20/01/15 08:51 PM
3

I agree with the "too late" assessment. That's why I wrote about men and women riding different waves. We're just out of phase now. The WAFs (#WomenAgainstFeminism) are trying to claim NAWALT, but even if they become the vocal majority it won't reduce the risks to men until laws change.
/r/MGTOW20/01/15 08:44 PM
2

I'm of the opinion that women get depressed when in charge because they don't like the accountability. They do like having the power to make the decisions, but they would prefer if some one else was accountable for the poor outcomes, should they arise. That's why they prefer to influence others to do what they want. They get plausible deniability that way.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 05:25 PM
3

Okay. What does it require? I'm sure the definition varies by state. The definition I referenced is the Federal definition.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:46 PM
10

Feminists have successfully got the official definition of "rape" to require forced penetration of the victim. What happened here is called made to penetrate, which is classified as sexual assault, not rape. They do this so they can say men are rapists, but women are not.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:21 PM
8

Maybe they should just ban men from attending at all. The mere presence of men is scary to women, or so we've been told. Look at the benefits! No more rape culture on campus, and with women getting all of the college degrees the wage gap should shrink and reverse. It's a win-win for women! These fish certainly don't need bicycles.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:00 AM
2

I already answered that question. Marriage is a good deal for women, bad deal for men. Not my fault her boyfriend ignored my advice to not marry. Not that any of this matters. Kids in the "stupid years" of 15-25 ignore parental advice anyway. They already know everything. One of my sons is a full on blue pill beta orbiter in his mid 20s. He has rejected all of my attempts to educate him.
/r/MGTOW20/01/15 04:14 AM
5

Apparently Cuomo isn't happy with the current female heavy gender ratios on campuses. He needs to discourage even more men from enrolling. Colleges won't be safe for women until all men have been purged from their presence.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 12:56 AM
11

I told both of my sons to avoid marriage. I also told my daughter to go for it. Simple math. Marriage is a bum deal for men, great deal for women. But just to be consistent, I also told my daughter's boyfriend to avoid marriage. The fool married my daughter anyway. That was 3 years ago. Divorce pending. Lucky for him she isn't asking for anything but "out". No significant assets for either of them.
/r/MGTOW18/01/15 03:51 PM
1

That was fun. She was incapable of seeing herself as wrong. Doing so might put a dent in her "I'm a victim, because vagina" worldview.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 03:43 PM
24

Thanks for this post. Solid data, good analysis. Women have to play the Peter Pan card. The alternative is too painful to acknowledge - that men are just finding better things to do than chase women.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/15 09:19 PM
1

Don't equate MGTOW with relationship avoidance. MGTOW is just about not subjugating yourself to the female imperative. You don't have to avoid women or hate to be MGTOW.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:57 PM
1

It is either (a) a good paying job or (b) youre a failure as a man. In the eyes of women, yes. But men don't have to subscribe to that view. More and more, men aren't seeing a need to join the rat race. They are embracing a more relaxed and less consumerist lifestyle. Some by choice, some by the realities of our current job market. Don't fall in to the trap of believing that you need to be what women want you to be.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:52 PM
1

Simple, if he wants to keep his writing gig, he has to portray this through the lens of feminism. He is at college after all. Male problems are always self-created and usually bring harm to women and/or children. Had he even hinted that the primary cause was related to a hostile environment for men, his piece would not have been published.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:29 PM
2

This comic is a succinct representation of the current state of feminism. All victim, all the time.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:22 PM
5

This all started last summer with California's YesMeansYes law. As more colleges adopt the "guilty on her word alone" standard, more men are starting to just avoid their coeds altogether. As HU says below - just ignore the women on campus. Do you really want to place your degree and future at risk in a college tribunal? Work on your schoolwork instead of your notch count. You'll get a higher GPA and better job prospects.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:33 PM
1

Yes. Women will always want to be where the men are.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:00 AM
1

Look for the female/male gender gap at college to widen from its current 60/40 to 70/30. Those men that do choose to attend will be avoiding women.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:52 AM
3

The article is a year old, but still good. It doesn't say MGTOW is wrong, it just recognizes what it represents to society, same as we do. I'm always happy to see "mainstream" sites that aren't in the manosphere publish articles like this. We preach to the choir here, but out there is where the red pill needs evangelization.
/r/MGTOW09/01/15 03:47 AM
1

TLDR: Provide men with multiple disincentives to marry and you will solve the wage gap. IOW: MGTOW + minimalism is the answer to the wage gap.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:41 PM
1

Don't worry, since this is a government program for men only, the feminists in power in the UK will get it nipped in the bud.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:25 AM
1

There aren't any capitalist countries left. Pure capitalism, as in a truly free market economy, is how humans behave naturally when they are allowed to own and trade property and labor without interference.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:18 AM
6

It may be satire, but it sure is an accurate portrayal of the current methods being employed to (unintentionally) reduce the wage gap. The post is rather long, but a great read nonetheless.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 12:31 AM
3

Japan's Herbivores are the leading edge of MGTOW. They are avoidant for similar reasons to the West's MGTOW movement, and similarly unorganized. If it wasn't for immigration, Europe and the US would have sub replacement fertility too. Most European countries have sub-replacement fertility even with immigration.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 06:09 PM
2

2015 will at least start with the current "rape culture" mantra fully intact. As the article pointed out, even the Dept. of Education is against due process.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 10:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter