TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sansurnt Archive

View 3 posts and 107 comments by sansurnt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

sansurnt/r/askTRP21/04/14 01:33 AM
1

sansurnt/r/RedPillWomen22/04/14 07:35 PM
0

sansurnt/r/askTRP23/04/14 03:13 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

What is MGTOW about according to you then?
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 01:51 AM
1

I've been around all types of people my entire life and since I accepted them, they accepted me. I've worked, studied, and lived with both genders. There's evil and good on both sides in equal measures; pure logic would suggest this and reality backed it up for me.
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 01:39 AM
1

Sounds like she loves you.
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 01:29 AM
1

Pretty easy way to convince yourself that you know everything without knowing anything.
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 01:15 AM
-6

Becaus that's what it clearly is.
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 09:33 AM
2

Are you the guy in this conversation?
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 02:11 AM
5

You do realise that happens to everyone regardless of gender? That men do it to women as well? If you're allowing people to get to you this much I'd suggest you really work on finding some self love and hapiness. Also treating women you've never met as sex objects and reducing their personality to squat is exactly what you claim people are doing to you but to a much worse degree. Another cynic, another illogical person, another reason for others to feel better about themselves.
/r/ExRedPill07/08/17 05:07 AM
0

Ever think that they were just nice people? And being nice is not being submissive unless you walk around being an asshole all day?
/r/MGTOW05/09/16 01:17 AM
1

The only place that isn't liberal anymore is the north, even then, the north has a very bad reputation for being economically and socially regressive.
/r/askTRP09/09/14 11:02 PM
1

Ireland, not liberal? bahaha. Have you ever even lived there?
/r/askTRP09/09/14 07:42 PM
1

How did you get "I can't be taught" from me saying "I can't be lead"? I can be taught but I will not let someone lead my life for me. Being taught and being lead are completely different things. Being taught is receiving information and having the choice to do what you please with it, being lead is being given information and having no choice in what to do with it. I give up or change my opinion when someone gives me facts or when I've seen evidence of something, I'm not just going to change my …
/r/askTRP25/06/14 05:11 PM
0

I don't think you get what I mean by I'm not submissive. I can't be lead by someone, I don't just give up my opinions when someone expects me to. I'll only be submissive to the same extent as my partner is. Submissive as a definition basically means to give up your opinions for someone else. I really don't think it's necessary for me in a relationship, I'd rather have a relationship in which I could debate with my partner and was considered on an equal standing as him. I grew up in a family wher…
/r/askTRP25/06/14 06:44 AM
1

By not many people, I mean mainly in the first/second world among the young (my) generation, and also not to the extent of taking it literally. Many people do not believe in religion on a fundamental level. I didn't mean it in terms of evolution, I meant in terms of culture. We live in a society where individuals, unless they are children, do not have to depend on anyone. Women have economic dependence and can live their lives on their own. They are no longer thought that their is a way they mus…
/r/askTRP25/06/14 05:06 AM
1

There's a reason not many people believe in the bible or religion anymore though, and you basically just stated it. We understand that people cannot be put into roles, everyone's an individual who does not live their life according to what a book written 2000 years ago wants. We also now understand that the bible was written by humans and had no divine guidance to it. To be submissive can also be dangerous as we see from the redpill. From what I've read there is a few guys over at the redpill th…
/r/askTRP25/06/14 04:29 AM
1

It actually implores both sides of a marriage to submit to each other. Have you ever read the bible past that one quote, because it states that literally aboutthree sentences after that.
/r/askTRP25/06/14 03:25 AM
5

Guys. Seriously. It's a troll post.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 10:12 PM
1

There is also women that have an easier life than me and some that have a harder life than mine. Red pill seems to claim that all women have it easy. Trust me, their lives are as intricate as yours.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 10:08 PM
0

About 75% of my friends who are women are atheists or agnostic. They all have personal view points on issues and can argue their side of a debate if needs be. They all have different goals and plans for life. Some are shy, some are funny, some are just plain weird, some are mean, some are serious, some are self conscious and some don't give a fuck, . Insecurity and ignorance is not gender specific. Also please tell me why you are trying your best to look and find a bad side of women? Can you not…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 10:05 PM
0

I'm in a rush and I'll reply properly when I return. I'm just curious do you think due to being a man I have more potential than a women? Do you even notice some small difference in the way I word my opinion? Do you think there is really that big of a schism?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 09:13 PM
0

It's other men who force men to fight. Women couldn't force them, they could just encourage them. Yes, it's pretty shit to encourage or force anyone to fight but everyone was quite indoctrinated at that time apart from the men at the top actually waging the war. Yes, it was the experience of the vast majority of men and the vast majority of men did nothing special in history as well. For basically the whole of history a man's suggested role was that he provide and make or do something remarkable…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 08:11 PM
1

Men wage war on other men. Please do show me evidence of women engendering a war and benefiting from it? Is it not well known that in war women are highly likely to become rape victims and become collateral deaths or have you completley ignored that aspect? Have you ever even looked up the past oppression of women and the omission of them from history? Seriously look it up, research it. You might learn a thing or two about women being seen only as child bearers, denied access to education unless…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 07:35 PM
1

I never said men are more primal. I said both genders are equally primal. Men's primal nature is quite a lot more dangerous. It's a well known biotruth or whatever those things are? I admit this as a man. Yes I do have a chip on my shoulder. I call it reality.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 07:22 PM
-1

It didn't make me feel uncomfortable it just baffled me as from life experience his comment just made no sense . I'm generalizing red pillers not a whole gender. I'd never generalize a race, sexuality or gender. Red pill seems to be a belief system in which most believe the same things about women. A whole gender does not believe the same thing therefore they should not be generalized. People who openly believe the same thing should be.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 07:04 PM
1

People are primal, women especially.- the red piller. That's exactly what he meant. He did just say women are especially primal. How can you deny in the face of evidence? I don't know what weird reality you live in, where women are not also seen as animalistic but in the reality I'm in, both men and women are acknowledged as sexual beings who crave sex and are both primal. Men's primal instincts are naturally focused on more, though understandably due to sometimes being the more dangerous instin…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 06:52 PM
-7

I know but he implied that women are more so. That is something that just makes no sense and screams of "I'M SUPERIOR". Seriously, as a guy I just don't see where he is coming from. The whole species is pretty primal, some individuals seem to be more than others but certainly from what I've gleaned from actual reality there is no gender is more primal that the other, they're also both equally capable of knowing what they want. Redpill really needs to stop thinking it knows the mind of a whole ge…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 06:35 PM
1

This. This is unrivalled. You're the best.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 10:45 AM
2

Gentlemen? hah!
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 04:42 PM
2

It's definitely not as pronounced nowadays in the race to obtain the most money though. Particularly now that now many people are getting married.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 04:07 AM
1

Not exactly. Women are encouraged to get a career but if the choose to be dependent on a husband, there is a lot of pressure on them to be financially independent before the find that husband.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 04:03 AM
2

But why are you so sure we are in gender roles? Nowadays it seems to be more like human roles, particularly if you are middle class. It's basically a rat race of everyone make as much money as possible. I don't see it in gender.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 04:00 AM
2

Yes, and now they are doing it with more benefits and with the ability to obtain a higher ranking in their career. Housewives also receive respect. I don't see your problem with working women. Everyone's role is however they can best survive. That can either be by working yourself or marrying someone who is working.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 03:49 AM
2

They can be houswives or career women nowadays. They don't exactly have a role.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 03:45 AM
1

It's getting more common though, considering testosterone levels have on average have dropped 20% globally in the last 20 years. Better start lifting them weights.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 05:24 PM
2

No, it's a biotruth that men's sex drive declines with age. Look it up.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 04:49 PM
1

Would you say that they've existed throughout history in such abundance? or what do you think has gone wrong?
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 04:26 PM
0

Yes something like that could happen but the most competition young working class men seem to be getting nowadays is through video games in their parents basements. I believe they're called men-children? Whatever they are they're on the rise. I don't think they fear competition much.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 04:19 PM
1

I agree competition is always a good thing, the more rigorous the better but competition in most jobs nowadays isn't as revered as it used to be. Many kids, for years to come will be getting graduate degrees in the fine arts as there is certainly an underlying feeling in society that you can do next to nothing and still live a substantial life. Competition just might not seem necessary anymore because if you think about it, it isn't.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 03:59 PM
0

That type of competition only seems to exist in kids and people with general low education though. I'd argue that nowadays most competiton is seen in academia for both genders.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 03:39 PM
1

It exists in a lot of women as well.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 03:25 PM
2

Basically what I'm saying is men also lack whatever it is women want from love.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 10:54 PM
2

Oh no, Do you by any chance happen to use the same methods to get into these relationships? Everyone has a preference, yours seems to come with a side of emotional abuse. Many people do it, including women. I'm sure you've heard the "all men are the same" or "all women are bitches". I often wonder if they have themselves to blame. I certainly used to choose from the same pool because it was safe. You really have to work this out. Also unless it's a weird epidemic in America, all women are certai…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 10:48 PM
2

You thought they were attacks? I thought I started off defending hypergamous women, not attacking. Then you asked me my number which isn't something the red pill as a whole revere so I believed that was an attack on me. You see, conversations I've had with redpillers before always end up in profanity and sloot calling, even if I just ask basic questions such as the cock-carousel one. Three questions: what's the emotional abuse? what is the way men want to be loved? I've hardly ever met any guys …
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 09:49 PM
2

Holy shit, bahaha now my friends and I sound like quite the nymphomaniacs. So basically what you're saying is that the dick is always read for a-going so I'll never be left a-waiting? That .... that sounds pretty marvelous. If you could please tell me though, do you find that the redpill helps you get sex? also why do some or all red pillers get mad about the cock-carousel phenomenon. I've never seen the anger explained.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 09:11 PM
2

Really? It seems to be a very different case from what I see around me. A lot of women masturbate, at least from within the age bracket I know best (18-26) perhaps it's different where you live. Men definitely seem to have much more of a lust to have sex with women but I think women seem to mainly strive for multiple orgasms (if you can give a woman this, you are a default alpha in her eyes, I promise). Though if it's one thing I agree 100% with the red pill is that if a guy is muscly and tall, …
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 08:50 PM
1

Okay perhaps I have. explain red pill to me. The side bar does not do it must justice.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 08:37 PM
2

You do understand though that women are still somewhat shamed into keeping their sexual endeavors or needs quiet. But sex for it's own sake I'll tell you from what I pick up around friends is that it is very desirable to them. If women didn't like sex vibrators and dildos wouldn't have a large market nor would 93% of women masturbate. The media and society as a whole portrays us as a some innocent creature but if you perhaps swallowed the red pill on women's sexuality, you'd realize it's not exa…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 08:35 PM
0

From what I've read in both the side bar and on the subreddit, it actually looks quite dangerous for a woman to be in a relationship with some of you. Also with all of the"women don't make for good conversation, aren't as loyal as men, emotionless, the most responsible teenager of the house, should adapt to the mans way of life and opinions? That sounds pretty shit to me and I can't imagine more than about 2% of the western female population adhering fully to the red pill dichotomy.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 08:23 PM
1

Heh, you see you went back on what seems to be the golden red pill rule. A womyn whos slept with moar then 1 man outside a relationship is a sloot. Why would I actually tell you anything about my real sex life outside relationships when from what I've seen back at the main subreddit numbers like that are used to circle-jerk and slander?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 08:19 PM
1

I've had 3 longish term relationships. I was happy within each one. Yes we had sex frequently. No I did not have to neg them because believe it or not women also like sex.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 08:03 PM
0

Oh but it is biased. The whole TRP thing seems to be set up as to predestine a woman as an inferior to her partner. With the amount of dodgy statements and knee-jerks I see in the red pill community, I would not trust it for a minute.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 07:53 PM
0

I know it's going on, I think that much is clear, I never denied it but I really do despise when this attitude turns into the AWALT. Because perhaps up until about the 50's there was no grey bit in the middle but now there is quite a large gray chunk. What happens when a woman has more status? does anything change?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 07:13 PM
2

Well most of the time I'm either at college or work and often I waste a lot of time on the internet, just like a lot of red pillers.So not a lot of time to fuck every guy I'm attracted to But if I'm in the company of a guy I'm attracted to and I have time, of course I'd have sex with him. But of course it also depends on if he's attracted to me.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 07:08 PM
-2

Sooo you've been married? or are you listening to all the hyperbole at red pill, where the so-called grown married men use words such as gynie and STFU non stop. Basing your marriage off anonymous advice on the internet seems pretty damn stupid like really really damn stupid.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 07:04 PM
-1

Dude it's the truth. They're not completely oblivious to this.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 04:50 PM
-3

Or you know, that thing called reality.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 03:31 PM
0

On the main red pill subreddit the majority of the time if you mention you're a female you get ripped to shreds which I'm not so much angry over as I am confused to why. Why does their anger and trying to find footing in the world usually generate somewhat negative views of women aka the apparent cause? Surely they should be angry at the people who perpetuated the lies? Which I'm going to guess is society as a whole, or why can't they just be angry at themselves considering it was their own igno…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 03:30 PM
-8

Women know when you're negging about 95% of the time, if they persevere with the contact it's because they just want sex. Why is that so hard to understand?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 02:52 PM
0

THIS! Being confident and not overly rigid in your view of what you must be is a massive turn-on to women.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 02:45 PM
-1

Women want to have sex with every man who appeals to them as well. Sorry, but I do not get the whole sex object and status object thing. In western society I see that both genders are now both these objects. I know it's almost against the law here to mention you're a female but I am and from my prospective and how I see all my friends are, is that we now know we can make our own status so why depend on a man for it? We now choose men for looks. There's nothing bad about this so why do some red p…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 02:40 PM
-12

Dude, stop asking the internet for advice. It is beta beyond belief. Do what you believe you should do, use your instinct. First and foremost, treat your wife with respect and try to mutually pan out the relationship. No one in a marriage should get a louder say over the other.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 02:30 PM
1

Ever notice how a lot of guys on the red pill seem to be 16 year olds who are angry because they don't want to go to the effort of treating women like humans. Be confident in who you are and listen to your own instincts in what you should do to get a woman. Don't take advice off a website. I can't think of anything more beta than that.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 02:27 PM
-1

psh indeed, live and let live. My biggest problem with the red pill as a whole though is they seem to meet a few women and then judge the whole female population through them. Could you explain that to me? I think I've seen more relationships in western society in which the woman wears the pants. Is their strategy to refute this?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 02:21 PM
1

fair enough. But couldn't you say that most red pillers do that as well? Is it even a bad thing?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 02:03 PM
-4

You do realize that in modern society at least in the west and now slowly picking up in the east, no one has any fixed roles. You have to take your rose tinted glasses off. Some men nowadays are hypergamous. It really does not matter.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 01:50 PM
-5

This is a bit preachy.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 01:17 PM
8

Wait, if women are meant to be hypergamous according to red pill theory, why do you shame them for doing so?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 01:01 PM
1

nyeeeah
/r/askTRP23/04/14 04:46 AM
2

It's a lot about personality you know. Looking good and buff won't get you everywhere unless all the woman wants is a quickie.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 04:18 AM
0

I think you'll find that needy is the opposite of most females in this current generation.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 04:16 AM
3

Bahaha you guys really over think all of this relationship stuff. It's just a damn text, not a deal breaker.
/r/askTRP23/04/14 04:15 AM
-1

Work now dude, NOW. The SMV thing is a lie. You're going to miss out if you don't work NOW!
/r/askTRP23/04/14 03:15 AM
3

You say you offer women the world and then get annoyed when they use it or you? You do not offer women the world, women offer themselves the world. Seriously, we're not in the past where a woman had to marry to be economically independent. From what I see in society around me (not some fantasy land) women do just fine on their own. There's women I know who out earn me and I'll admit seem to be having a happier life than I am. I don't see why they'd need me or any man in this day and age. They ca…
/r/RedPillWomen22/04/14 11:03 PM
5

So your mother who birthed you is not worth anything? This sounds like your hamstering towards some sort of inherent superiority which you really do not posses. What do you individually give a woman? You can't just point to other men who have given women something and say therefore I've done it as well. Women can make themselves nowadays for the first time ever and more are choosing to do so by the day. Women don't get married because they literally do not have to. There is plenty of men apart f…
/r/RedPillWomen22/04/14 09:22 PM
2

But this does not apply in modern society. Women nowadays are making themselves as for the first time in forever they are economically independent. Women are no longer made by men. Men aren't made by women. This seems to be longing for a time long gone. Many women and men, particualrly in my generation (late teens, early twenties) no longer want to get married. Surely this shows that women no longer need men for status.
/r/RedPillWomen22/04/14 07:39 PM
2

In what what way does a man give a woman the world? I see both men and women giving themselves the world. It's there to take and experience together.
/r/RedPillWomen22/04/14 07:18 PM
1

Another thing you mentioned here that a lot of red pillers haven't caught on to yet is that sometimes a woman wants a beta man, or at least some guy who isn't uptight and rigid in their idea of what a man should and must be. Stop analyzing whether or not you're coming across too beta because the hottest thing to most women is a man who is confident in who he really is and is not afraid to show aspects of his personality that other men may shun as "gay" or "beta". Another thing about women and wh…
/r/askTRP22/04/14 07:10 PM
-2

Nyaaah shucks. Cheers darling, you sure know how to make me blush.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 03:39 AM
4

bred you neckbeard fool.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:56 AM
1

We all do see reality! I've never seen such shock at female behaviour before as I've seen at redpill. It's like your the only set of guys who grew up looking at the world through rose tinted glasses. No one pedestalizes women as much as you all seem to do and did. You react to it disproportionately more than you would react to a man doing the exact same thing and then say falsely that all women do it.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 11:05 PM
1

So this is the mentality of the red pill?
/r/askTRP21/04/14 11:01 PM
1

Are you scared of women or something? Have you ever met some in real life or when one shows actual human traits and not traits that the red pill says she has inherently, do you retreat because you don't want your fantasy smashed? Seriously in real life if you treat women like humans usually you will find that they are. The red pill makes them out to be some sort of weird other species all together. Also here again you used "STFU" I'm doubting again your age of"53"
/r/askTRP21/04/14 06:12 PM
1

Another thing is, you referred to me as "son". Which is something I've never heard someone over 20 use. Do you have a wife? why are you spending all day being bitter about women on the red pill if you really are 53?
/r/askTRP21/04/14 06:08 PM
1

It's obvious that women do this also, but it's a small amount. We can't judge every woman of a few other women's actions. There's no logic in this and I still think it's your fault for at one time in your life putting them on a pedastal. Nobody actually does that, so why did you and most of the redpillers? Men for eons have been slaughtering people, starting wars, raping women. Isn't the jail population 90% male? Why are we so shocked then when women show some bad traits? Why is it worse when th…
/r/askTRP21/04/14 06:06 PM
1

Wait a minute? No wonder you're butthurt. At what time in your life did you think that half the population were angels? The whole human race is pretty shit. I even know this as a man. Were you really that stupid to think that all women were nice? Some are better than me, some worse. Why do you claim they all have this shit true nature?
/r/askTRP21/04/14 06:01 PM
5

After 3 drinks or at least when she becomes sort of overly tipsy, yes always becomes a no for me.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 11:11 AM
0

Most societies force women to marry up as it is their only way to get status or more of it. For the first time in basically all of history women can be self made. It's only in western cultures and only for the last 2 generations and with each generation it got stronger. Even asia is following this trend with more women deciding to not look for success in others but in themselves. I'll say it again that this isn't something that benefits me but it's happening and doesn't look like it can be stopp…
/r/askTRP21/04/14 11:06 AM
1

Then why do redpill men on average earn less than their female partners and seem to be quite against education? Certainly that is the opposite of hypergamy if they willing to be below they majority of women on the "status scale". Seriously, if you went out and talked to girls instead of just talking to them like vaginas, you might realize that things are changing damn fast and they know this. There is women marrying down now more than ever and the women of my generation seem to be more intereste…
/r/askTRP21/04/14 11:02 AM
1

I answered you above on this same topic, even the way you won't fully spell out vagina sort of proves to me you might not even be ready for partnered love.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 10:54 AM
1

Have you seen how much mothers love their kids? How much people are in happy relationships? Are you perhaps bitter that a woman doesn't love you, therefore feel the need to denounce their ability to do so?
/r/askTRP21/04/14 10:52 AM
2

Be confident about what you do. A huge turn of for a woman is a man who is stuck in a rigid idea of what it is to be a man. Be you first and foremost.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 07:13 AM
1

Be confident but don't be arrogant. It'll get you far.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 07:03 AM
1

Good luck!
/r/askTRP21/04/14 06:46 AM
1

I'd most likely go with the casual date at this stage but do whatever you think would suit her as a person. The same moves won't work for every woman. Not even slightly. But yes, the casual date sounds like the way to go. Just know that there's no need to neg or be mean. If a woman wants sex she'll go for it, if she doesn't, being rude will not help. It just makes you look slightly stupid to her. A lot of red pillers think it was their rudeness that helped them pull but usually the woman probabl…
/r/askTRP21/04/14 06:36 AM
1

Well, just treat her normally. Women know when someones negging if they persevere despite it, it means they want sex. There's no need to feel sly or like something is working. women are aware of shit tests as well.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 06:22 AM
1

To be honest, she's probably in it just for the sex as well if she's playing along and didn't call you out on the teasing. Just text her asking to meet up and don't treat her like an ass-hat.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 05:38 AM
1

But that was written for a different time, different social structures. It would be madness to believe it after and during a period of such grandiose and rapid change. I'm trying to make deductions from contemporary society and the redpill to me, in contrast to actual society, screams of a longing for something that is no longer.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 05:08 AM
1

That's okay if it's your personal preference but please remember women are not as shallow as a lot of men think. The media acts to perpetuate this. A woman in this current society particularly or at least from the generation I'm growing up in, won't leave you. The women who were going through education when the recession hit understand the plight of men and now understand that success in a partner isn't as important as once believed. Choose a woman on how well she suits you, not on what you beli…
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:57 AM
1

I think the reason why the role of a sole provider has been diminished is because it was very dangerous and risky for a woman to be economically dependant. It also limited economies around the world. When women are free everyone benefits. Thank you.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:45 AM
1

I'm in my late teens and I'll admit sadly for me, this generation of women seem to be now choosing a lot of their partners for looks. Luckily they're also looking for personality now as well. But I get the general feeling they now no longer want success for the men they'll marry but for themselves. We seem to be on a level playing ground now, in which men are valued as much for their looks as women are. I can't change society. This does not benefit me but I see it becoming more common.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:29 AM
1

The women that surround me in my daily life aren't like that though. Particularly my sister who has a much higher income than her boyfriend of 4 years. I don't know where you live but if it's anywhere in the west, you guys are seemingly stuck in fantasy land.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:21 AM
1

These are people who are in the top tier of society. They have nothing to do with the people you our me are going to meet. Anyways the men here are what I'd imagine is unbelievably hot to most women. So regardless of status or not, they'd still of married them.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:19 AM
1

Yes, I agree with the look side of things for both genders but in a society where a woman can have equal status to a man why are you only focusing on looks?
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:14 AM
1

No, I want to ask the red pill why they deny people individualism. In which for the first time in a long time, women now have the pleasure of exerting. From what I see in real life and what I see on the red pill, this all seems like a fantasy.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:10 AM
0

How do you know how women think? They all mostly seem to be very individualistic nowadays compared to throughout history in which they were forced to do this. Marrying up depended on their survival. They no longer need this. I see women who like skinny men, fat men, average men, muscly men, successful, unemployed, funny, quiet. They're free from gender norms. Unlike most men I know, sometimes including myself who feel pressure to look more manly by being with someone less than you. also how do y…
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:06 AM
1

But that's an awful lot of generalizing. Women nowadays have the choice to marry for love and looks. I see many women marrying down. This whole redpill thing doesn't seem to benefiting from modern times.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:02 AM
-1

How do you know what they want? The whole of society is adapting to women's new found power. Many no longer believe in the so called "women's wants" and understand that it was because they were forced to marry up in order to get anything but not anymore, therefore women can now chose men based on looks and not on success. I see this becoming more common and as a man I'm not phased by it and I certainly don't think we can claim to know what women want in these changing times for them.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:00 AM
-1

You do realize we only believe those so called "women's wants" because for the whole of history up until now they've been forced to be submissive in order to get anything. They're no longer dependent on us. I know many women who do not care what their partner is like in terms of superiority. Though I agree with your assertions that most would prefer a tall guy. The women I know, know their minds and none really seem to care if the guy is better or worse than them. Nowadays more than ever relatio…
/r/askTRP21/04/14 03:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter