TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

savoirfunk Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by savoirfunk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Love is a big tent word that covers a lot of different things. I'll give you a definition, so at least you have something to work with: love is choosing to become one physically, emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually (destiny/origin/place in existence/big questions kind of stuff)--to the end that her good becomes your good, and your desire becomes for the best of things to occur in her life, so that she would respond in the best way, becoming the best person she can be. That's a mouthful.…
/r/seduction04/05/12 03:19 PM
3

It seems actors playing high status characters, like the king in a tragedy, etc., move slowly and don't move their heads much. These are high status indicators.
/r/seduction08/03/12 05:22 PM
1

'Amateurs worry about strategy. Professionals concern themselves with logistics.'
/r/seduction26/02/12 06:38 AM
1

Kk.
/r/seduction23/02/12 08:13 PM
2

You and I need to up our game in this area. I often get long pauses in texting, which tells me my stuff isn't tight here.
/r/seduction22/02/12 05:31 PM
3

(Warning long.) I agree that they're right to want what they want. It is better for them, and it asks us to step up a bit, so it's better for us. I think the best way to seem interesting (i.e., not worth flaking on) is to be interesting. Now this depends greatly upon the girl as to what is interesting. So you've got two options: enhance what you've already got going for you, or specialize by targeting a specific kind of woman and conforming your practices to what would appeal to that type. To me…
/r/seduction22/02/12 05:20 PM
6

So for a moment, I thought you were OP. This would have made this response much funnier to me. Sadly you are not, but I'm not taking back my vote.
/r/seduction21/02/12 09:11 AM
5

She has consideration primarily to her own pleasure and interest. Flaking means she found something more interesting to do. Not providing a number artificially limits the possibility of interesting things happening--it's better for to have and not need your number, or more particularly, your plan for a given night, than to simply refuse your number or even fail to offer her own. All of this seems tremendously self serving of course laid out like this. Because it is. Remember that to women the no…
/r/seduction21/02/12 09:07 AM
5

I too am old, and will die soon. All hail Tony!
/r/seduction21/02/12 08:57 AM
2

<sings> "It's the zing of the day!"
/r/seduction15/02/12 04:33 AM
1

Baby steps iznou. Baby steps.
/r/seduction17/01/12 06:10 PM
2

it changed what I originally thought was natural rapport into what felt like a plan. Don't look at the man behind the curtain.
/r/seduction17/01/12 06:06 PM
1

spend less time on your computer The direction of your life is in your hands, unless you are a slave. Even slaves can choose what to think.
/r/seduction17/01/12 05:42 PM
1

It helps to intentionally value other people. Liking people makes it easy for them to like you! And the second commandment is like the first: intentionally adding value to others is extremely potent. That shit is like a value cocktail.
/r/seduction17/01/12 05:40 PM
2

If you want to be the best conversationalist someone else has ever met, learn to excel at listening. -Confucius
/r/seduction17/01/12 05:38 PM
6

It's a matter of training and dedication. A mere novice like me would be schlurping on two, maybe three cocks a go. I can tell by the gleam in cdank's eye and the rubber in his heels that he's a champion cocksucker. Expect the whole shebang to be standing around, wondering what happened, emptied, abandoned dicks a gleaming in the air in a matter of seconds, while cdank is tucking into his second slice of Molten CHOCO--oh so good, nom, nom, nom.
/r/seduction17/01/12 05:35 PM
2

Wow this turned into a wall of text. The fact you're here, asking this is encouraging to me. Welcome to the beginning of a worthy quest: to be an interesting man! The progression I've seen is this: media (atmosphere) -> thoughts -> words -> acts -> deeds -> habits -> character -> destiny Note that for each of these steps, energy and activity and time is required. You will not attain your goal without conscious choice and personal effort! "As a man thinks in his heart, so is he." "The world is as…
/r/seduction17/01/12 05:21 PM
1

Excuse me, I was ambiguous. I agree with you--your comment was not an attack 'to the man' against me. So, in the words of remarkably cute woman I know, 'still friends'?* However, I could not find a way that your comment refuted my point, explained a mistake in my point, offered an opposing argument, etc. It seem to me then that your comment had to be understood as impeaching OSC's authority on human interaction, so I called it ad hominem. It seemed like you were indulging in a bit of what the wi…
/r/seduction17/01/12 05:05 PM
1

Hi. http://i.imgur.com/fjZc5.jpg This is an ad hominiem attack on my point. Can you go higher on the argument pyramid?
/r/seduction16/01/12 12:38 PM
1

Thank you very much, that's the book. She took a terrible approach--if she were a scientist. Since she's a writer, the use of the word experiment in this case is misleading if understood as a controlled study testing a supposed principle by a replicable situation recorded for an academic peer audience. It is not misleading if the obsolete sense of the word, experience, is understood. To the point I take you to be making: about something something rutabaga something plural of anecdote is not data…
/r/seduction16/01/12 12:34 PM
1

Let's assume you're incorrect. Atheism was/is the default, and belief in god is an innovation. Where does this take us? Why do people who were once atheists come to believe now?
/r/seduction14/01/12 03:40 AM
1

Haha carry on then--cheers. I like to think, and haven't thought about this in a while. I like better to think together.
/r/seduction14/01/12 03:39 AM
1

Let's assume you're correct, that Atheism is an innovation. Looks like 'yes', right? I mean, is Atheism better at whatever Religiousity solves? This begs the question, what does Atheism (logical AND) Religion solve? I get (no conceptual order): Social belong to a special club, more enlightened than others (maybe) honor the ones who've gone before--true for all Atheists now existing, n/a for first Atheists be part of the new attraction, the coming thing. Most religions have an eschatology, or at …
/r/seduction14/01/12 03:38 AM
1

An interesting reframing, which I'll entertain momentarily. Meanwhile what would you change re heteronormativity (so called, feel free to start to find a definition we can both agree on, although definition stuff hasn't been a problem so far). As an aside, I do ninja edits for 3-4 minutes after most posts, so be warned.
/r/seduction14/01/12 03:24 AM
1

Actually, it's the reverse, right? The burden of proof is on the new idea, because what is has been shown to work (first approx propagation of species in this case). It's the best kind of evidence: the kind that's evident. What would you change, and how would it be better?
/r/seduction14/01/12 03:18 AM
1

I apologize--I was ambiguous. I was stating that this is the way things ought to be. What now?
/r/seduction14/01/12 12:16 AM
1

Why does it work then? My point is that if any technique the seducers proffer 'works', it does so by connecting something true and in line with nature in the student with something verifiably present in the world. Natural/artificial is a silly, almost pointless distinction to me. It assumes man is somehow apart from nature, but I don't see a clear reason to suppose that to be the case. Maybe you're going for artful/innate? But then you're just praising what humans aren't; naturals at anything be…
/r/seduction13/01/12 11:29 PM
-2

Hi. Did you ever read Ender's Game? There's an interesting discussion between Valentine (genius girl, she's like 11 I think) and Ender (her I think 9 year old brother, saves humans from teh alienz, super smart). He's accuses her of manipulating him. Her response is that we're all manipulating one another, all the time. That's what wanting something and talking about it is. This manipulation can be intentional or unintentional. It can be for a wicked purpose or a good purpose. So her point is, so…
/r/seduction13/01/12 11:23 PM
-1

Did you see the book/article by the lady who pretended to be a man? Crap I can't find it. To make a long story short, she (tries) to date girls, but finds that it's very, very hard. So she quits beating her head against a wall and outs herself to several women, who instantly become nonhostile. The gist is that, if you're (an) unintentionally attractive (woman), you really don't know what you/re talking about.
/r/seduction13/01/12 11:02 PM
-2

Ok, I'll bite. Let's pretend gender roles are cultural. Men ought to take the ones that they tend to take/are immensely more rewarded for taking in our civilization. Lesbians/otherians are not descibed as a norm in this model because they aren't norms statistically or ethically. Prostitutes are an example of women/men failing at/perverting gender roles. Heteronormativity is correct and praiseworthy; perversion is inaccurate and blameworthy. Btw, this is so, so offtopic for this forum. If you wan…
/r/seduction13/01/12 10:47 PM
6

which is really nothing more than a fee taken from your limitless fund called "Ego" Respect.
/r/seduction12/01/12 07:31 PM
2

Don't get her to agree; remove the obstacles that prevent her from agreeing. So, e. g. you can give in (negotiate/compromise) on matters that are irrelevant to your goal, in exchange for progress toward your goal. Better yet, don't frame it to yourself as a negotiation. Frame it as an engineering project, or a collaborative creative act, or as a surmountable mutual obstacle--a team sport. Better than any of those: amuse yourself, and invite her along for the ride. If you can't have fun on your o…
/r/seduction08/01/12 02:15 PM
1

But, but, but -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NT2eOGZzRGI
/r/seduction04/01/12 07:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter