TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

scazrelet Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by scazrelet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

NAWALT There is more psychological difference between individuals than genders. All people are like that, or they aren't. I think universalisms are shit, so you know which gets my vote.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 11:33 PM
-4

From a survey by Men's Health. Question 23. http://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/sex-survey-results/page/3 Stop deluding yourself.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 11:22 PM
-9

Life isn't a huge game to most people. One counter example: Society tells women that having multiple partners lowers your value, so after a certain point their imaginary number outweighs their desire for sex until they prove to be a viable partner. By only wanting sex and not an LTR you are essentially proving her right. You haven't made yourself worth the risk yet. Sure some women will fit into the scenario OP posted, but most won't so it's worth is questionable. I can think of plenty of human …
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 11:09 PM
-16

Or it's because women are humans and not manipulative objects with degrading agendas. Maybe she is having an honest and natural non-trusting reaction (which you can grasp with the use of the word "hurt") and the best bet is to be non-threatening but passionate, essentially making her crave sexuality. Don't kill it with kindness, kill it with sexy. The assumption that all women use sex as a weapon is fucking retarded.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 10:01 PM
0

I was going to reply to this but then realized that, as you phrased it, it makes no sense in relation to the quoted text. So let's start over. "Feminists are being stupid (everybody get together) and mock them." You ask who is mocking ME. Are you insinuating I am a Feminazi for calling people out in their communal raising of pitchforks against something so obviously meant as non-serious? Perhaps I am a staunch supporter of men's rights who hates to see... what should I call it... "Meninazism"? H…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:22 AM
0

Still a prank not serious. Messages may vary. *ka-edited for clarity
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:33 AM
12

This is obviously a joke. It becomes apparent when you read the top text, and is even further alluded to by the use of the word "equality" in a non-equal situation. But obviously everyone here just went LOOK FEMINAZIS ARE DOING HORRIBLE AND/OR STUPID THINGS LET US JOIN IN MOCKING THEM! That makes you no better than the people you are purporting to hate.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:28 AM
4

PUA works because it forces a man to appear confident. Women like confidence, not assholes. PUA may work for meeting girls, but it fails at long term relationships unless you maintain a process that is almost always mentally unhealthy for the woman. She will become insecure and unstable, and will make for unhappy times. Women like attention. Imagine that. Women are allowed to have casual sex. They responded well, sure, but did either of you make attempts to stick around? That's not a relationshi…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/13 03:46 AM
3

That would be what I would most stress, yes. The only examples I have heard of people jumping the wall fit into the same categories: The girl never knew he liked her. He told her and she approved. The girl said she liked him as a friend. He stopped hanging out with her, returns over six months later, looking/acting different. Sometimes just say, losing weight will "fix" the issues, but is still better in conjunction with, well, not being around all the time. The girl never took an interest in hi…
/r/seduction17/08/13 04:33 AM
7

10 women is not nearly a large enough sample size. I could easily come up with ten women who contradict at least a good portion of those results. Things that stand out as "off" in particular: The number of men they are texting. Are these all "interests"? If so, these women are a very small minority. I imagine that these are friends or the occasional booty call at most. These are not people you are competing with. You DO NOT want to be one of those guys if you have any interest in more than a fli…
/r/seduction16/08/13 11:08 AM
7

What if it has nothing to do with the purported reason for the subreddit but more so the behavior of it's posters?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:57 AM
3

No, I for one totally support Men's Rights, but this subreddit is one of the most hate filled cesspools I've ever encountered. I can't stand it. I can easily see why it's been banned.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:54 AM
4

It's shit like this... When I first got my Reddit account and started adding new subreddits, I saw MensRights and thought, oh man, that is something I can get behind, even if I am a woman and all. I support that. I have since unsubscribed and, worse yet, get a little cringey whenever I see a post from this subreddit float up on r/all. One thing's for certain though, it's making me understand why men hate overly vocal feminists, if they are anything like some of the guys here. It was fairly obvio…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 12:36 PM
1

I am honestly surprised, the cost of living being so high there. Still, 40k is well above full time minimum wage where I live - around 15k a year. I still say being a stay at home parent is the privilege of the better off.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:10 PM
1

Where do you live? Do you get student aid?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:33 AM
1

I suppose this also depends on where people are living? My brother and his wife are only able to stay afloat on one income with their two kids because he has student aid and an extra source of income.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:31 AM
1

It is financially impossible in this day and age, unless one parent has a top dollar job, for someone to just not work and raise a kid. I don't know what the right answer is as far as maternity leave - frankly I support it, despite never wanting kids - but having stay at home parents can't happen in this economy.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:15 PM
1

I suggest you are meeting the wrong "feminists".
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:57 PM
-1

I think in both cases my thought would be "he/she is an idiot".
/r/MensRights01/05/12 06:46 PM
1

Geeze, all of you are acting like the worst types of feminists right now. Perhaps, she honestly just needs an education on the actuality of men's rights? She obviously sees it as ONLY a reaction AGAINST feminism. This is almost immediately apparent to me. Some of you kind of are acting like children...
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:34 PM
-9

Too bad these aren't equivalent. *edit I know no one will read this (this has been a long time after the fact, 9 days), I thought about deleting the post, but I stand by what I say. Look, I think the OPs post is bullshit too, and I believe in Men's Rights, imagine that (though a few of the posts I see in this subreddit are barely blanketed misogyny) but these things really aren't the same. 8 for example: Pass on booze night just to sit through her rantings. Ok, so he stays home once in awhile wh…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:59 AM
6

As inda221 mentions, this is a parody. The original post: http://jezebel.com/5650974/madonnas-dolce--gabbana-ads-before-the-photoshop/gallery/ The text from said post: Some images purported to be unretouched photographs from the Spring/Summer Dolce & Gabbana campaign starring Madonna have popped up online. It certainly looks as if the photographs taken were retouched extensively; in the ad, her nose is slimmer, her jaw is not as wide, her neck is smooth, the definition in her arms has been smoot…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 05:15 PM
1

Yes, that is the idea, but I think it says something even close to that really once in the whole thing. It doesn't seem to be the focus at all, when I think that perhaps it really should be emphasized, not glanced over.
/r/seduction11/11/10 09:32 PM
3

I guess what made me not see it entirely that way is he phrased it as "my best friend said" - so presumably a third party commenting on how he treated others. If it had been "All my friends starting calling me out as a dick" that would have been different.
/r/seduction10/11/10 11:37 PM
10

"This was proven to me three months later when my best friend came to me asking me why I had recently become such a jerk to all my friends." While I want to agree with large parts of this article, this line in particular bugs me and makes me wonder if he took it too far. No, you don't want to be a doormat, but at the same time doing small favors and generally being nice is why other people do favors for you. It's part of a sort of grander altruistic social contract. I am reminded of a bit of gam…
/r/seduction10/11/10 11:12 PM
1

I've been worked over before, I am sure, but there are also plenty of times where I have met someone trying to lay a con and just saw right through it. It's a long time since I've been in a situation where I ended up feeling uncomfortable or regretting it (except for a couple long term relationships, which I am sure you will agree is a different beast). I understand a man can seduce a girl, its a matter of learning basic psychology, and if the intent is good, I might even participate back, but I…
/r/seduction05/11/10 03:31 AM
1

This thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/e0cpu/oh_look_more_supplicating_feminized_men/c14btb7 It bothers me that I can't tell if it's satire or not.
/r/seduction03/11/10 09:55 PM
1

It just really sets my skin crawling when I see advice that would make, over time, the "target" an unhealthy insecure emotional wreck. Yeah, it would keep the guy getting laid, but at a particularly gruesome cost. These guys don't want insecure needy women, but at the same time they give hints that seemingly revolve around creating them. It baffles me.
/r/seduction03/11/10 09:48 PM
1

Oh absolutely, I stalk you all the time philosarapter.
/r/seduction03/11/10 09:43 PM
1

I will ignore you presumptuous insult for a second. I ask you then, completely legitimately here, what in your opinion makes a quality woman?
/r/seduction03/11/10 09:42 PM
1

I understand it's seemingly counter intuitive, and I certainly have fallen for the pretty boy narcissist, but I have read stuff on seddit that I know would never work on me. I spend way too much time performing my own mental checks and maneuvers to easily be "gamed." If the person on the other end were not honestly interested in me as a person and were just looking for sex, if they were trying to manipulate me, I would more than likely know it. And I would probably not give them the time of day,…
/r/seduction03/11/10 09:41 PM
-2

And all those "feminized men" have a better chance of getting in my pants than most of the people I find frequenting seddit.
/r/seduction03/11/10 05:31 AM
2

At the same time, by fearing putting her on a pedestal, you can't avoid being flat out nice and adoring of her. You just have to do it in a way that expresses your strengths and affection rather than your need for approval. You aren't giving her flowers because you want her to dote back, you gave her flowers because you fuckin felt like it. Because you like to see her smile. It's a very fine line, granted, but its unavoidable that girls, at heart, no matter how kick ass and tomboyish, still have…
/r/seduction28/10/10 06:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter