TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

scdi Archive

View 0 posts and 175 comments by scdi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There was consideration to make raping someone to be signs of a mental disorder. The actual truth is very very complex.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 11:51 AM
70

What were these kid taught? They were taught that fully consensual sex enjoyed by both partners can be rape because some stupid little rule wasn't followed. Granted, we already have some stupid rules like age of consent (40 year old raping 4 year old is clearly wrong and illegal, but two preteens being charged with raping each other because they were both too young is just stupid). Feminist are making everything into rape, and because of that rape is no longer a bad thing. Some rape is bad, but …
/r/MensRights15/10/15 11:48 AM
3

In the US it is unclear. Every time it reaches the Supreme Courts, they go with your opinion. But then law makers change some law and it becomes illegal. The most recent law change has not been challenged in courts and, to the extent of my knowledge, only one person has been tried under it for just drawings (not real child porn), and he accepted a plea deal instead of challenging it. It is normally reserved for adding even more charges to those found with real pictures to trump up the numbers. I…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 03:42 AM
2

who dox etc. need to be prosecuted and swiftly punished. FUCK THAT SHIT! If I see, 'Hey, tiltedrea has a G+ account where they list their real name' and point that out, I should not be prosecuted for a crime. This is how the feminist win, they keep getting crazier and you keep agreeing with their not as crazy shit.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:46 PM
20

Her list of inspirations on her site are almost entirely female, except her sons. I hope they're resilient. They are so fucked, and not in a good way.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:41 PM
7

First, why is a minor exempt? Child pornography doesn't stop being so when it is a minor viewing it. Second, often nakedness doesn't have anything to do with it. A clothed but highly suggestive picture of a 7 year old is far more likely to be considered child porn than a picture of the same kid running around nude at the beach. The standard is not clear, but there are enough nude pictures that are not considered to be child porn. Finally, in some places, it doesn't have to be a picture of a chil…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:39 PM
-1

All people have the right to vote. Children don't. And any justification for taking it from children can be used to take it from some adults. We just find it unacceptable because of racism in the past.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:36 AM
4

I'm wondering if some people were thinking I was being serious.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 11:49 AM
7

Those laws don't apply to child porn. Good luck rewriting them in a way that does that won't get you crucified for supporting child porn.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 12:21 AM
9

Well see, when he hit the snap button, he was catching photons that had been emitted a moment before. That moment was the difference between him being a child and an adult.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 12:19 AM
3

She only did it because some man made her. He probably abused her by denying sex or raped her by asking for sex.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:55 AM
1

Utilitarianism is only used when it promotes girls over boys and women over men. Don't buy into their bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:11 PM
2

Police end up not pursuing because they find out that it was some feminist who made the claims and they realize that if they prosecute her, they'll be the target next. Feminist then use not pursuing the case to show that rape culture is as strong as ever on campus.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:58 AM
2

What is in her mind? She knows she can't compete with even a shitty looking sex bot and realizes that any value she has left will be stolen away by the bots. Which is actually wrong, because her value is already pretty much nil with her education background, her experience, and her looks making her a person not worth having a coffee with (being good at any one of these can make for an interesting coffee break chat but she has none). But it will let her blame futuristic robots (which for the most…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:55 AM
1

You know, I never want to take anything away from people who are raped. You don't have to worry as in most of these cases it isn't actually rape, just regretted sex that Feminist are yelling is the same as rape.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:53 AM
0

romantic relationships Or just showed how much BS was in those relationships and how onesided relationships tend to be. If guys can be happy without, then that improves their situation.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:13 PM
7

The laws were never meant to protect. They were meant to enforce sexual morals. They use to have laws making adult/adult sex outside of marriage illegal as well, but those have since been struck down. But don't buy the lie that they were 'for the children'.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:26 PM
1

If the same motions are used, shouldn't a yes still be a yes? You are buying their bullshit if you think a yes from a physically mature person should ever be a no.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:22 AM
8

Let me try: When she and the rest of her blue-haired nose-pierced asshole racists are gone, the tech industry will breathe a sigh of relief. When she and the rest of her blue-haired nose-pierced asshole sexists are gone, the tech industry will breathe a sigh of relief. When she and the rest of her blue-haired nose-pierced asshole KKK members are gone, the tech industry will breathe a sigh of relief. When she and the rest of her blue-haired nose-pierced asshole rapists are gone, the tech industry…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:13 PM
2

It is even worse for rape. A woman who is raped can choose to live without a reminder of her rape, but a man can be forced to know he not only has a child resulting from his rape, but he either has to take responsibility for it or it will be raised by his rapist.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:07 PM
2

These are not feminists anymore. These are just man haters who want to use men. But that what feminist are at their core. Some are just more honest about it.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:04 PM
6

This is why the term 'divorce rape' is catching on. What he provided to the relationship must continue to be provided, but had she been required to keep having sex, it would've been considered rape. This is why the simple lesson is to never marry and only have children where you are the only parent.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:18 PM
11

Yet if the parents lose their job, the government doesn't keep paying for them. Or if a parent dies, the government doesn't keep paying for their quality of life. This is about taking from the man to give to the woman using what ever justification they can think of.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:16 PM
6

Meanwhile I know some kids who are living off of less than $433 a month because their father is dead and the government doesn't think they should receive any more support than that. Best interest of the child is bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:15 PM
4

Not seeing how it is a good idea. You can give people really cheap cars that still function well. Even paying for repairs saves more over new cars.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:00 AM
1

You better hope you have an iron clad prenup and that the judge doesn't decide to toss it anyways. Why even get married? Just stay together. Only cases I can think of are pretty extraordinary. In general, just don't marry.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 12:00 PM
2

TED = good (for all I've seen). TEDx = shit. TEDx with some other things after the x = abomination that needs cleansing.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:37 AM
11

Except even in the new system, too many partners is something men with options don't choose. Yeah, there are other men who don't care, but they are often invisible until the women have exhausted all better options, at which point they are upset that they have to settle for someone so, by their own standards, low.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:26 AM
1

A little of column A, a little of column B. In short, I'm not really mad at any one, but instead I'm perplexed because it appears people are getting mad at something either way it works. There are three things at work here: A rape victim never deserves it. There is nothing a rape victim could have done that would have meant she deserves to be raped. As such, none of her actions can ever be used as a defense to say it wasn't rape. (Except for her giving consent. What I am trying to say is that if…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:05 PM
24

as the word will eventually lose all meaning. You act like this hasn't happened.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:11 AM
1

Murder and pedophilia Murder and sexual orientation are not alike.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:10 AM
1

He already plead guilty so the conviction can't be appealed. Since appeals can be coerced, this is bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:08 AM
1

Aaah yes the good old illegal act of having consensual sex. This is assuming a 14 year old can consent. What gets me if that most of the people protesting this says a 14 year old cannot consent. There is still plenty of reason to get mad at the judge rejecting the plea deal, but it seems most people who want it to be illegal for a 14/19 year old couple to have sex are mad that the 19 year old in such a couple got punished for having sex.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:07 AM
6

Keep in mind that if the noncustodial parent cannot afford proper living conditions on $144/wk, this can be used to further reduce visitation. Keep in mind? But that is one of the key reasons they do this.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 01:46 PM
17

Except the new generation who sees that wonders why not just skip marriage and go straight to the escorts.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:07 PM
3

2.5 Consensual sex deemed non-consensual due to reasons like age. 2.75 Or how much you had to drink 3 Or not wanting it but deciding to do it anyways for some reason 4 Or not really wanting it (Note all the above is assuming a female victim only)
/r/MensRights24/07/15 11:04 AM
1

Ever since statutory rape was considered rape the word rape has included consensual sex that someone somewhere had a problem with. If you can say 'because of this one law, there wasn't actually consent', then you can say 'because of this other law there wasn't actually consent'. Fucked up and sounds like a slippery slope, but watching all the feminist slide down it makes it not see like a fallacy.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 11:01 AM
2

To ogle? Nah, spin the story that he experts her to put out or she'll be replaced by the next good looking woman who barely meets any qualifications.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 11:30 AM
2

This is true in many if not most states. The reason for this is because the age of consent use to be much lower. 10 to 12. It was raised but people at the time didn't think an 14/18 year old relationship (or something similar) was wrong. But the religious right didn't want out of sex marriage, so they created a law where marriage (with parental approval) would be allowed but sex would not. Dating a child was legal back then (you can't do anything sexual, which includes most kissing and any sexua…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 11:57 AM
3

It does not ignore if the crime is harmful. It ignores the mental state of the person committing it, which is arguably worse because even if a crime was agreed to be harmful, but someone who didn't mean to do it at all still accidentally did it, they should not be treated as someone who did it.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 11:52 AM
4

The only way we will ever have fair treatment under statutory rape laws is to reduce the sentence maximums to these short sentences that women keep getting. You can preach and teach and moan and groan all year long about how women should be getting the same long sentences as men, but that will NEVER happen. If you want fair treatment, you have to reduce the maximum sentences.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 11:49 AM
8

Asking them to change is the equivalent to ask a man to be attracted to a 400lbs piece of fat. Bullshit. Yes you can't help you are attracted to, but not being a 6'+ man with a 6 pack and 6 figure salary is not the same as being a 400 pound lard ass. No one is saying women should be willing to date the unemployed meth addicted guy. What is being said is that people need to have realistic standards on what is attractive. This means a woman realizing that her salary doesn't mean much to most men (…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 01:48 PM
8

"If your wife, whom you loved, really desired to be waked up with penetration, would you?" "If she wants it... why not?" "PRIOR CONSENT DOESN'T COUNT FOR ANYTHING YOU FUCKING RAPIST!" How I see all rapist studies since I learned how much they play with the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 12:11 PM
1

Many places put 16 as the minimum but quite a few have laws that allow for younger.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:49 AM
2

Actually all 3 as the loophole applies even if you are marrying a 9 year old (Muhammad would approve).
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:14 AM
3

50% chance to divorce. Even higher to cheat. And for what? For me to risk having to split all my assets and provide for her so that I could get only a fraction of the sex she use to give away for (nearly) free? Only an idiot would accept such a deal. I'll find me some college student looking to have a good time. So I looked for any reason why one should get married. I only found one single good reason for a guy to get married. One (and calling it 'good' is probably wrong anyways). See, the age o…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:26 AM
2

Except 16 is legal in most of the first world. Just not in Hollywood where movies are made, which is why there is this view it is 18 when 16 is legal. For extra shits and giggles, 16/17 is still legally a child (at least in the US). Meaning that having sex with a child is legal (for only the ~10% oldest kids around, but no need to mention that last bit).
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:20 AM
3

You gotta blend in with them as you do so. Point out that so many businesses are extremely sexist, that even when they could cut costs by hiring only women for lower, they still insist on hiring men. Such stupid sexist businesses.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:17 AM
7

female FEMALE Please use trigger words when engaging in such mansplaining language. On a serious note, you can't debunk it for those who really buy into it. No stats will work. No simplistic arguments. They don't care that they are wrong. Some might already know it is wrong. But what matters it to keep beating the drum til you get laws passed that benefit women even when parity has already been reached.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:16 AM
5

Insisting that rapists have rights like due process offends me because it is supporting rape culture. Also, using male student instead of man student offends me because it sounds so clinical. I'll kindly ask for you to add some trigger warnings and then remove this post per the new policies. We can have a mature and thoughtful discussion without such offensive language like questioning if men rapists could be innocent.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:11 AM
14

Black men have more privilege than white women? It would say it is a troll except I've met these SJWs in the wild and they are literally that stupid.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:09 AM
1

Nah, leave it down. Just might want to be aware I'm not gonna lift it regardless of what I'm gonna do to the toilet. (As a side note, when I go to sit I clean it first with soapy papertowel (or TP if nothing else is available)).
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:59 AM
3

The way it works. Benefits women to point them out separately? Point them out. Benefits women to combine it show just one big number? One big number it is. If you see any big number that doesn't specify women, just assume it is primarily men being hurt because if it was primarily women, that would've been pointed out.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:56 AM
1

Let's say a 45 year old teacher has sex with a 13 year old student and both people consented and enjoyed the experience: are you saying that isn't rape? That is exactly the same as a 17 year old having sex with their 18 year old SO for two years whom they love dearly. Because all rape is all rape and you can't start talking about how certain rape is worse than other rape. Well, it is the same thing if you buy into that SJW thinking. Of course I advocate considering each case in and of itself and…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 06:21 PM
-2

Rape is great fun. Here, let me explain why (through this won't prevent SJWs from misquoting me anyways). All rape is equal. You can't say this rape or that rape is better or worse. Statutory rape is often enjoyed fully by both partners. They both agree it was a great experience and have no regrets. Therefore, all rape is equal to these instances (you aren't mansplaining about how some rape is worse or less real than other rape, are you?). That is to say, all rape is equal to cases where all par…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 12:56 PM
11

Shit, gay marriage legal for less than a month and we are already seeing straight people turning. XP
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:19 AM
1

Yeah there is a difference. I said This is so vastly different from a teen who wants to have sex
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:33 AM
1

What most people seem to ignore is that a child who is groomed is still forced to do sexual things. Maybe after a while the child will 'consent' to it, but the initial grooming was still non-consensual and thus 100% illegal even without statutory rape laws. This is so vastly different from a teen who wants to have sex, yet some people seem to act like if loosening age of consent laws is equal to legalizing kidnapping and raping a child.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 12:20 AM
2

Yeah, when you take a step back and realize how many points extremist feminist and religious conservatives are equal on, it really makes you wonder.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 12:18 AM
3

Not the future. Just the expansion of the Duluth model.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:16 AM
6

and the state senator's comment that he can always be a welder or a truck driver is very condescending. State senator is too stupid to realize how much the internet is needed for those jobs. Hell, even applying to McDonald's involves the use of the internet.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:15 AM
6

I did some research on them. Age of consent is not a new topic, but the ages used to be really low. 8 to 12, with 10 to 12 being the common ages (fucking Delaware was 8, seriously WTF with that?). But a coalition of feminist and religious conservatives pushed to raise the age of consent much higher. The religious conservatives also pushed for 'age of consent doesn't apply to married couples' exceptions that many laws have to this day. Why the religious pushed for such is pretty simple. They want…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:14 AM
8

It gives a way for a lot of people guilty of statutory rape to get away with it. The bigger question is, if a person is old enough to lie to get others to have sex with them, then perhaps they are old enough to be allowed to consent to sex.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:10 AM
28

That is just silly. Children were their greatest tool. Look at how much internet monitoring has been instituted to stop child porn and how many filters there are to protect children. Then terrorist and all their internet monitoring. One might say terrorist were first and children were second... probably case by case depending upon which nation we are talking about. Women are, at best, third on the list.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 11:37 AM
5

Yes, throughout history women have been raped in a lot of situations. In those same situations, men have been murdered. Anyone who thinks of rape as worse than murder isn't worth wasting any time on.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:26 PM
6

What are these "people" paid to do, exactly? I can give you an honest answer if you want it. I know some people who work in the public sector. They are paid to follow procedure. They live by the procedure. They breath the procedure. They eat procedure for lunch. Violating procedure will cost you your job and your retirement as well as open you up for to be liable to anything else that goes wrong. Even when it is simple procedure deviations which would've been celebrated in the private sector are…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:15 PM
3

One of the main purposes of statutory rape laws are to acknowledge that proving these kinds of cases are very, very difficult. I see no evidence for that except for an after the fact attempt to justify them. but that's a hell of a lot harder to prove than just that sex took place. Better to let a guilty man walk than to punish an innocent man. Lowering the standard of evidence or criminalizing more acts just to make it easier to prosecute the actual crimes is a horrible stance. That said, the ag…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 11:56 PM
-3

The simple solution is that we need to support removing statutory rape. Yes means yes. No means no. If some old person gets a young child to say yes by threatening them, that is still rape even if statutory rape doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 09:58 PM
11

Feminist: No!
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:45 AM
2

Yes, I still remember that case well. Honestly, I think it was an injustice to blame you for her laughing so hard she had a stroke. It really wasn't your fault that laughing herself to death was her reaction to a micro.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:51 AM
1

Because it is a likely story that gives a reasonable doubt of innocence. It might not be able to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes at least as much sense as claiming he wasn't framed.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:49 AM
4

Forced enslavement for a year is fine though? When someone kidnaps a person, them being killed during a rescue attempt isn't anything worth crying over. The DA and judge are both guilty in this kidnapping.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 02:13 PM
10

Possession of penis.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 02:12 PM
2

They would only need to prove he is being framed if this was a criminal case against the girls. Since the criminal case is against him, that they do cast doubt is reason enough for the evidence to be admitted. The goal isn't to prove innocence, it is to make proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt impossible.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 02:12 PM
4

If this was how people commit homicide, maybe things like this wouldn't happen. As long as it is men committing suicide, at best you won't hear a peep and at worse you'll have cheering.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 02:10 PM
2

See, a man sexually abusing a child is something really really bad. Thus a woman who participates is going to be punished for doing so. But a woman who helps sexually liberate a child, well that isn't a big problem. So no need for more than a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:27 AM
5

Because MGM and FGM share the same justifications by the general population, the acceptance of MGM will make the problem of FGM worse.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:20 PM
3

I wonder why more people who choose suicide don't mix in a bit of homicide? It isn't like they have anything to lose if they do.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:46 AM
16

More like male feminists should seek treatment for their Stockholm Syndrome.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:44 AM
9

I do. Woman says she was raped. I listen and believe her. Man then says he was the victim of a false accusation, so I change to listening and believing him. Thus, unless the man admits to doing it, I'm listening and believing the man as he went last.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 11:08 AM
21

Reddit debunking: I think the sample size was too small (without any statistics being done). This study disproves it (link to study that does not disprove it). Here is an advocacy site that say they are wrong (link to site with no citations). That is sexist/racist/etc. The study is old and no longer applies. The author was obviously biased.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:11 AM
4

Mass support of the rape of impoverished children? Granted, they tended to be boys so people don't care as much. Look up the dancing boys of Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:09 AM
18

Feminist would be happy with such a world. Remember, they are bullshitting when they talk about equality. Never trust a feminist farther than you can throw them (which for many isn't far at all).
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:06 AM
14

Yes, because no one would give a shit if a woman was doing it. You wouldn't even have assumed he was 'scoping out' the school.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:04 AM
1

That is a pretty large sample size. There is an entire field of statistics that will let you know exactly how reliable a study is given a certain sample size.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:31 PM
24

Make it, don't tell professor, keep making more as the topic continues (with growing evidence).
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:29 PM
7

If you viewed gonewild, you can bet a few of those girls are 16/17. When you view the image, it is downloaded to your computer and stored (browsers store them differently). Do you think everyone who views gonewild should face similar penalties?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:28 PM
7

I think it stems from the observation that sexual offenders are much more likely to repeat their crimes than other offenders. Except they are the least likely to reoffend. The only exception are the stereotypical serial rapists, and like serial killers, the only solution for them is to lock them up and melt down the key.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:20 PM
2

Is the original source a feminist or related to feminism? Then you can disregard with little consequence.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:10 PM
1

Not as interesting as your previous insistence to tie together two subjects which shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 04:12 AM
1

We are way beyond the original post. The question remains as to why you keep thinking children when we are talking about sex.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:55 AM
1

Coercing them is an additional wrong on top of that. Nope. The wrong is already there, because they are children. There is no more wrong to be added. As for moving goal post, you were the one who brought children in this.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:46 AM
1

It is wrong to have sex with people by coercing them. Especially children, are you dense? You still think it is wrong because of coercion? Not because they are children? You really need to work with your therapist more on this issue.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:41 AM
1

I was always the one saying that having sex with children was wrong. You were just saying it was wrong because of coercion. You were the one saying that coercing a person into sex is not wrong. When the sex is not wrong for other reasons, such as the individual being a child. You seem to have trouble with handling multiple concepts at once here. It seems you have completely changed your tune, perhaps you realize how wrong you were and are trying to switched around your words. Poor fool. I'm not …
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:13 AM
0

So you do admit that coercing children into sex is sexual assault. Even with absolutely no coercion it is sexual assault because they are children. The coercion has nothing to do with it. You do realize that sex with children is bad... right? Might want to talk to your therapist about this.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:06 AM
1

Considering that all psychiatrist are psychologist but they are also medical doctors. What? You must not have as good an education as you allude. Heres some information about young boys being sexually coerced and why its bad. Oh, so now asking your adult partner to have more sex is equal to molesting children.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:54 AM
12

It is pretty clear women have it better. In the past, when they really couldn't do anything, it would be debatable. A man could be worthless or he could be everything, but a woman was just a woman. But in today's world, men still have the same problem while a woman now can go further if they so desire. Men have to do things. Women don't have to, but they can now choose to if they want.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 01:20 PM
0

Nah, I'm more on the psychology side of things. I'll leave the psychiatry side to you and all your pills. Granted, pills are probably rape as well.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 03:22 AM
0

You're project your illness again. Stopped taking your meds again? You know your therapist won't be happy with that.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 10:15 PM
0

Everything you do is rape. Rape for breakfast. Rape for lunch. Driving to work is rape because the car never consented to you penetrating it with your body. You should probably stop all the raping.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 12:32 AM
1

I wouldn't go so far as the 'majority' are false, So what you are saying is that it is more likely for a man to actually commit rape than for a woman to tell a lie about it?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:45 PM
0

Forcing does not include 'I'm looking for more X in our relationship and I feel like it is time I move on if we can't find a way to have more X'.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:44 PM
2

The methodology of the study didn't include cases that were turned away when initially reported for so clearly being false. A study showing reality is going to have a hard time being published in this current political climate.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 11:34 AM
2

Remember '2-8% of rape accusations are lies'. This story doesn't count as one, only as a 'rapist go away due to lack of evidence'. The reality is that the majority of rape accusations are lies.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 11:25 AM
0

All PIV sex is rape. Oral sex is rape too. Every thing is rape. I had rape with a side of rape for breakfast. I think I'll go to the theater tonight to watch the new rape about the Avengers.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:52 AM
1

Shit, congress labeled pizza a vegetable. Anyone thinking pizza is a vegetable because the law says so can be safely written off as an idiot. I call it statutory sex for the same reason no reasonable person calls pizza a vegetable.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:51 AM
0

Troll harder, i'm getting bored.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:42 AM
3

Except, you know, you're wrong legally in most jurisdictions. It is rarely if ever called statutory rape in the legal code. Lots of different names (with 'in the nth degree' all over the place), but statutory rape isn't one of them. Also, just because the law says something is or isn't rape does not make it true. If the law says pi is 3, that just means the law is wrong.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:29 AM
0

Accusing me of bastardizing words when you are the one to redefine rape to anything that hurts your feelz? Feminist tactic #982.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:26 AM
-1

But if you want to guilt her into fucking you for your own pleasure than thats wrong. Wrong as in 'I unscrewed the salt shaker for a prank' or wrong as in 'that was rape'? Just leave her and find someone else to fuck, you dont have to manipulate her to get sex. It isn't manipulation. Also, leaving because there is a problem with the relationship instead of communicating and stating how big of a problem it is (big enough that you are willing to end the relationship if not fixed) is a sign of imma…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:04 AM
0

You mean statutory sex? Calling statutory sex rape is a disservice to all rape victims, both male and female, both child and adult. Now, which is she guilty of? If the former, then those liking that facebook page can go shove their like buttons up their arse. If the latter, then prison is way too harsh. I do think a penalty of losing her ability to ever teach again would be a more fitting punishment due to professional ethics issues. And yes, I would argue the same for a male teacher.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:00 AM
1

Even a threat of breaking up from lack of sex? Go back to SRS.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:28 PM
0

As I said, I wasn't even talking about the teacher/student bit of this.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:28 PM
6

No, that is the patriarchy, treating women as if they are children not responsible for their actions. Also, if the woman was punished and the man wasn't, then that would be the patriarchy unfairly targeting women. Your breakfast today was probably the patriarchy as well.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:18 PM
-6

This is a nice attempt to redefine topics. Not the teacher/student bit, but saying 'sexual coercion' as if it is automatically bad. Why is sexual coercion automatically bad? If I tell a SO that the sex needs to improve or I'm bailing on the relationship, that is reasonable coercion. Much the same as my boss paying me to work coerces me to do work that I would have never otherwise done.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:16 PM
6

Are they? Did the teacher commit rape or statutory sex? Only one of these is rape. If it was rape, then they are rape apologist.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:14 PM
8

prove There is your first problem. Most people aren't logical about their beliefs, and this is extra true of feminist or those leaning towards such.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:04 AM
2

With 3 in 2 women being raped and absolutely no false rape claims, we have to do something!!!!111!
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:04 AM
10

It is like how 1 in 2 women are rape or how .001% of rapes are false. They know they are lying, but they know if they yell it loud enough that the general population will start believing them and make policies and laws based on lies.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:00 AM
21

Their being pigs has nothing to do with it. They said no based on the very old rule 'if it appears too good to be true, it is'.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:58 AM
0

Who said rape is horrible? See, all rape is equal (per feminist). And statutory rape is rape (per feminist and others). Yet you can find many 'victims' of statutory rape who see it as only a positive experience. Thus we have a case of rape that is viewed by the 'victim' as a good thing. And all rape is equal. Thus all rape has the possibility for being viewed as a good thing. Only a shitlord would start talking about different kinds of rape and make the claim that statutory rape isn't rape.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:56 AM
0

Easy fix. Permanent ineligibility to be a teacher (or otherwise in charge of a minor) is the punishment for consensual underage sex.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:46 AM
4

Don't worry, your higher tax rates will be used to help pay for their children against your will.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 12:02 PM
2

But the true victims of rape are the fathers, brothers, and sons who have to live knowing their daughters, sisters, and mothers who were raped. Women should really remember who the real victims of rape are. /s
/r/MensRights19/04/15 11:59 AM
19

It started by saying teenagers couldn't consent, despite reaching sexual maturity. Then it was that those who were drunk can't consent. Now it is becoming those who have a little alcohol or a mental issue can't consent. Before long you'll find that if a woman has any psychological issue at all, it'll be that they can't consent.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:08 PM
1

It is a weeding technique. They want to have an easier time identifying the weak men so they encourage men to show their weakness.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:51 AM
6

Of course she would say she is opposed. Reverse the genders and it becomes 'but I'll make an exception in this case'.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:58 AM
3

As is locking someone in a cage for 10+ years for owning a plant or having consensual sex with someone. But we do that as well.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:33 AM
14

So what next? Video games cause terrorism? Video games cause pedophilia? (I've heard this about anime, so...) Video games cause suicide? Video games cause obesity? (Pretty sure I've seen this one.) Video game cause Atheism? (This and the next would largely be restrained to social conservatives.) Video games cause homosexuality? Video games cause the decline of marriage?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:52 AM
4

BLAH BLAH BLAH Murder with no body or missing persons, robbery with no stolen items. The police would show up long enough to tell the person to stop bothering them.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:18 PM
0

Just FYI, charges are decided by the prosecutor, not the victim. As such, her lack of charges would be due to her female privilege the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:16 PM
16

Innocent until proven guilty. There is evidence these girls lied. Not so much that a rape actually occurred.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:09 PM
40

No physical evidence should mean there is no conviction. Testimony should only be enough to get warrants to search for physical evidence at best.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:59 AM
2

The issue is that if you don't take a stand against this, it will become the norm, but there are many groups who will take a stand against men receiving any similar treatment so you'll never see men treated this way.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:07 AM
7

Well as they were explaining in twox, it is because only women can become pregnant, and it is fine to make different laws for how pregnant women are treated as long as they only treat pregnant women better. I'm not joking, this was an actual argument being used.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:05 AM
1

A good defense just means that the accused gets off. The accuser would still have to be tried and convicted of filing a false report.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:58 AM
1

Try her for filing a false claim. If she is found guilty, she loses the ability to make such claims for a period of time equal to what her victim would have served. Once she has finished her sentence, she gains the ability to file claims, but only for the period of time after the sentence is finished. If you abuse the power, you lose the power.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:54 AM
3

Ya, you got that one backwards.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:42 AM
15

Health insurance costs more for women because of pregnancy related issues? That would be sexist, equalize the costs. Other insurance costs more for men because of just as valid socially based gender differences? Well sorry, but we can't just go ignoring reality to help make men face special treatment, that would be unfair.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:42 AM
2

f you're wages were sufficiently high, I feel confident you'd care less about taxes. Actually, if your wages were above middle class, you'd pay less than we peasant-folk. The highest wage earners pay the most tax. It is those who are above wage earners, those who earn their money via capital gains, who pay very little in taxes.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:34 AM
2

Just remember, it is largely possible thanks to taxes that are paid, with the larger amount per person being single childless individuals. If you can't afford a family, part of the reason could be because you are paying for some other individual's to survive.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:53 PM
1

What piece of paper? Women realized that men might not like to get married or officially adopt, so these days no paper is required. Live together for a little too long? Married. Be nice to a kid that isn't yours for a little too long? Required to support til they are 18.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:38 AM
1

While many circumcised men have no complaints The primary supports of female circumcision are women who were circumcised. The problem with feminist are that they will use an argument to support MGM but then turn around and say it is invalid for FGM because of feels.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:37 AM
2

Violence requires both aggression and a position of social power by the dominant group. Thus a woman is incapable of being violent against a man. /s
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:41 AM
6

I once played 'Real Feminist/Fake Feminist'. I lost so hard.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 11:13 PM
2

Why? Isn't the bigger problem here that a child rapist was considered a good enough person to automatically be given custody of the child just because the rapist was female?
/r/MensRights14/03/15 02:00 PM
2

EVERYBODY hates facts that don't jive with their world view. I'm hating this fact that isn't jiving with my world view.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 01:38 PM
1

Sperm bank, but let's be honest that that isn't needed. A woman has a far easier time picking up a random guy and there will always be someone down for a one night stand with no protection, especially if he doesn't have enough to risk losing anything to a child support order.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:35 PM
1

they cant do that in this day and age, you cant have a gender specific law penalising single men, its a complete overt breach of human rights. Yes you can. Increase tax, offer credit for all parents. A few childless single women will suffer with the men, but it will be very targeted because only one gender can have a child with little help (and notice that the 'right to be parents' crowd always seems to focus on single women or couples, never on single men).
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:13 PM
2

Either you marry and support a woman who has the option of divorcing you and taking most everything or not marrying and being taxed to support that woman who will now have a child with someone else and go on welfare.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:11 PM
1

Don't worry, they will still get their pound of flesh with taxes.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:09 PM
2

Don't worry, they'll increase the taxes so the women will be able to have children while you support them without the classical 'relationship' that use to occur in such scenarios.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:08 PM
1

Once the backlash against this happens, 5th wave feminist will be wanting violent rape to be made back into a crime.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:02 PM
2

"The patriarchy is providing them immunity. We much change the law." - feminist
/r/MensRights05/03/15 11:59 AM
0

The issue of statutory rape is entirely different. The idea is that someone under the age of consent, for a number of reasons, is incapable of consenting. If you examine those issues in light of a 17 year old consenting to sex, you'll find them all bullshit. Yes, there are good reasons a 7 year old can't consent. But those do not apply to a 17 year old. Thus it is a case of the law taking a fully consensual situation and retroactively declaring it rape. It means they don't have the capacity unde…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:54 PM
14

You should know by now it isn't pedophilia unless a man is doing it. / s
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:44 PM
0

The way I see it, once we accept that fully consensual sex becomes rape because her ID was fake and she is really 17, we have already opened the door for the rest of this. I'm not saying slippery slope is a valid argument, but when someone has set up the slip and slide and dish soap...
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:08 AM
10

I find these groups are almost always women who think that rape is something only a man can do (many admit men can be raped... by other men). I'm not saying them thinking themselves immune to being charged with the crime is the reason they are so adamant about this being the only crime treated as guilty until proven innocent, but...
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:05 AM
1

I'm not saying to ban it, just to not try to hide what it does under technicalities.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 09:07 PM
2

They prevent the blastocysts from implanting in the uterus Which a fucking large number of people consider abortion. Science saying defining that as not abortion because the blastocyst had not implanted even though it was already fertilized is akin to scientist saying that discrimination against men isn't sexism because men are in a position of institutional power. This is one of those rare cases where the scientist are pushing bull shit due to some 'technical' definition.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:32 PM
5

Feminist demand that women are seen as the largest victim in every way possible despite what reality says. This is part of their plan to shape society into an actual Matriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:27 PM
2

though much less so than the 30 year old There are virgin 30 year olds and 16 year olds who have had numerous sex partners. Both are rare, but if the two ever met up, would the 16 year old really be the one disadvantaged? At almost every other activity in life, experience at that activity, not age, dominates when determining who has the upper hand.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:58 PM
8

Except there are those who honestly cannot fathom a male ever being a victim, no matter how twisted a conclusion they must make.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:56 PM
3

When a woman cries rape, there really is no defense outside of being rich/famous/well connected.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 11:00 PM
13

Men are more dedicated because their value as a person is vastly more tied to their ability to provide.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 03:50 PM
51

Black out isn't rape. Passed out is. Black out just means memories didn't form, but they could still consent. Someone with amnesia is still able to give consent. The issue appears to be that she was basically passed out, which is very different from someone blacked out but still acting only drunk.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 03:49 PM
1

The thought behind this: "Hmm... men have it worse in this issue. Better put adds out to ensure that women are still seen as the real victim on it."
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:11 PM
1

You: Oh, hear is the blood test proving she wasn't. Judge: Doesn't matter, here is her testimony she was intimated. 10 years for rape.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:09 PM
1

In short, having sex with a woman will be seen as the same as having sex with a child. You don't get in trouble as long as they nor someone else complains about it. At that point, women are children.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:08 PM
6

Many of the men they are after now probably would have been willing to marry back in the day but weren't hot enough/rich enough to be worth it to these women back then. Only when they realize time is running out are they willing to settle, but the men should realize that with a bit more work, they could be winning over much younger women instead of settling.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:33 PM
9

If you have the misfortune of being in the age range to date these women, their sense of entitlement is palpable. That is why you don't. If you are able to attract a 35 year old woman, if you put a little more effort into it you can date someone in their early 20s instead. Why settle for someone who wouldn't give you the time of day until she got hit hard by the baby bug and notices that you are the best man left unattached?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:32 PM
7

But the notion of 'women attempt more' it an attempt to say that the attempt statistics are more important than the completion statistics, when that isn't the case at all.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 02:10 PM
2

Do they have anything in it about men's only health issues? If not, then the app is actually excluding me (by their logic).
/r/MensRights22/12/14 02:02 PM
9

While there are reasons to question the figures, the biggest point is that dead men attempt no more suicides. You should recognize this statistic for what it is, feminist trying to twist a men's issue to be all about the women.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 01:56 PM
4

At 7, ones understanding of right and wrong are limited by how one was raised. They are only beginning to understand that hurting someone is bad because it hurts the other person, not because you were told it was bad. something like sexual harm resulting from molestation is still outside the realm of most 7 year olds to grasp. BUT she continued this as she grew up and likely didn't even write down the worst things to happen. Give that she is a child molester and seems to be receiving very specia…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter