TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

scooooot Archive

View 0 posts and 126 comments by scooooot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

"LOLZ! SRS IS STUPID, THEY CAN SPELL! LOLZ!"
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:50 AM
1

How about you try at all, and then I'll think about putting some more effort into it.
/r/seduction10/01/12 12:54 AM
4

If having an awful sense of humor means that I'm not a racist, homophobe or sexist loser. I'll take it. You sir, clearly, have a wonderful sense of humor.
/r/seduction10/01/12 12:06 AM
5

If you would like proof of my gender that can be arranged. jpg or gif?
/r/seduction09/01/12 11:52 PM
7

Hmm, yes, your logic is quite sound. I mean, why would men object to the objectification and abuse of women?!? You were too smart for us, xmod2. You are most certainly an Alpha male!* *No you're not
/r/seduction09/01/12 11:48 PM
13

Most of SRS are men. We took a poll.
/r/seduction09/01/12 09:39 PM
1

Can you post the links to this exchange?
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:21 AM
-10

Yeah, SRS is a little wittier.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 06:10 PM
-6

Only if you convert your spermz into BitCoin.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 07:10 AM
-6

Because we want to steal their spermz.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 06:03 AM
-18

Oooo, you showed her!
/r/MensRights22/12/11 05:58 AM
-18

In all fairness I think the fact that a lot of Reddit hates us is why its fun.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 05:56 AM
-13

Wow, two special snowflakes in ONE thread. It's like a double rainbow but with less drugs.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 04:53 AM
15

Guys, I just think two things should be made very clear. 1) The article attacking Movember and calling prostate cancer less important than "women's cancers" was written by a man. 2) The linked article that is not only defending Movember but doing a pretty decent job of dismantling the original article is written by a woman. A feminist. Let's also remember that this was written by a student for a crappy local paper. This is hardly the New York Times. Hell, it's not even the New York Post.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:29 AM
6

The person who wrote the anti-Movember article was a man.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:21 AM
3

I have very little doubt that Cain is guilty of something. He is acting like a guilty man, not a man who is being wrongly accused. And powerful men like him are not known for their respect of women in the workplace. And let me be clear, not all powerful men sexually harass women, in fact most of them don't. But the type that do so are painfully obvious about their arrogance and lack of respect for other people. I don't know Cain, but he strikes me as this type of man. That being said, there isn'…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:17 PM
12

Because I wanted to express my distaste for everyone involved in the whole mess. And I am uberliberal, so I'm not especially concerned about people knowing that.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:42 PM
19

I think Herman Cain is an idiot. I think he would make a terrible president. I think the fact that he is being taken seriously as a candidate is absurd and speaks volumes about the stupidity of the typical Republican primary voter. That being said, I'm always extremely dubious of any allegations that come from someone being represented by Gloria Allred. She is an ambulance chaser of the worst kind, and what is worse she calls herself a feminist when she is nothing of the sort. She is a craven op…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:29 PM
4

Uhm, she was hardly pissed, just a little uncomfortable with something that she perceived to be transphobic. She even asked the readers what they think of the ad. Your outrage is pretty silly. As men we should be asking why there is the need to use woman to convince us that our health matters. Why do they think we are such base, sex-obsessed cavemen that will only respond to a PSA if there is a sexy woman in it?
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:56 PM
1

Sorry, but that is simply not true. A lot of hateful shit gets said and upvoted here all of the time and people who call it out as awful get downvoted and called feminazi's. There are a lot of very important issues that are brought up here and that need to be discussed, but it is almost always blotted out by "arrrg, woman commits crime, women are evil" nonsense.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:52 PM
3

r/firstworldproblems is over there.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 05:37 AM
4

Do you think anyone has ever actually asked a legitimate question on Yahoo Answers?
/r/MensRights16/09/11 05:01 AM
1

Of course not. But first of all we are on the internet, and we're not getting the whole story, only his side of it, so who knows what the reality is. And second, being the babydaddy to two different women that he is paying child support to suggests that he is perhaps making some pretty poor choices in partners.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 05:08 PM
0

Or he's making more of the kinds of stellar life choices that got him in his predicament in the first place and isn't managing his money very well.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 05:20 PM
3

So let me get this straight, you're saying that because she enjoys making and dressing up in costumes, she is basically forfeiting her right to not have a camera shoved under her skirt and photo's taken of her underwear/genitals without her consent? Are you fucking serious?? Of course she likes attention, for the costumes that she designs and makes herself and as a fan of anime and manga. She doesn't dress up in skimpy outfits, no does she dress up in order to get attention from men. And even if…
/r/MensRights25/08/11 10:24 PM
3

Provided that it isn't sexual or stalky, I don't see a problem with posting pictures of either gender on-line. The fact that this site has decided to limit it to men only is kind of lame, I mean, just put very strict rules about what kinds of pictures you will and will not publish. For instance, no pervy upskirt shots or things of that nature. That being said, I can kind of understand their reluctance. I have a female friend who does Cosplay a lot. Nothing slutty or skanky, and she never shows o…
/r/MensRights25/08/11 06:14 PM
4

I am gay. If you think women are the only gender that can be crazy you're deluding yourself.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 10:52 PM
-4

Bullshit. You can't hide crazy. I've avoided crazy my whole goddamn life. Just open your eyes and don't let your dick do your thinking. And no, I'm not at all absolving the women for doings something shitty and manipulative. They are clearly fucked up for considering doing this. But fucking crazy is a little bit like walking around a busy street with a fake bomb on your chest. You're not technically doing anything wrong, but it is still really fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 07:23 PM
-6

Beyond that, a lot of these men that get 'trapped' act like they didn't know that they were sticking their dicks in crazy. Honestly, the only people that this shit happens to are men who pick crazy partners and don't communicate their wants and needs. Don't stick your dick in crazy. Ever.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:34 PM
0

This. The poor kids are already basically losing who they thought was their father and now they are potentially being tossed into poverty. The fault is, obviously, with the mother who lied (I'm presuming that she lied and was not simply wrong or mistaken which is a possibility) and it sucks that an innocent child is going to suffer for that lie. At the same time it has to suck to believe that you were a father and then it turns out that you are not.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 03:44 PM
1

Fuck you dude. If you want to continue to make people think that everyone concerned with mens rights is an aspergers neckbeard then just go fucking ahead and keep acting like an aspergers neckbeard and see where that gets your movement.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 11:20 PM
1

Banning the subreddit is really more like putting a fence around your yard to prevent the pooping. But this is getting really circlejerky so lets just agree to disagree. :)
/r/MensRights22/07/11 04:22 PM
1

Unless said subreddit is a collection of content and users that a company find undesirable. Why cut off fingers if you can cut off the head?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 04:03 PM
4

I agree with you for the most part, but I don't think it's unacceptable to ban any subreddit. I think a company not only needs to maintain the right to ban content that they find objectionable but need to exercise that right on occasion. I really doubt this was an arbitrary banning, or some form of feminist conspiracy. It was probably a case of mistaken banning and will be rectified shortly.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 03:45 PM
2

Why? That's a serious question, and I'm not casting any blame on op, especially considering that it seems like a bogus banning. But seriously, why shouldn't a private organization have the right to ban something that they find objectionable?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 02:37 PM
1

That doesn't make any sense. Not all feminists whine. Some feminists whine. There is a difference. The feminist that wrote that article. Whiner. Me. Not a whiner. If you want people to stop painting you with such a wide brush then it's time you stop painting other people with the same brush.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:43 PM
-1

That was a stupid and fucking shitty article. And that's from a feminist and someone who thinks most of you guys are fucking whiners.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:57 AM
2

Sara Gilbert is a pretty well known feminist. A real one, not a fake one like Osbourn. I'm pretty sure (at least I hope) she knew what was going on and wasn't very happy about it.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:20 AM
1

People who internet date tend to do so because they are unable or unwilling to attempt dating elsewhere. Its a different pool of people than the general public. Had the entire article been based on the supposition that women on OKCupid (Or other internet dating sites) were pickier than men I'd have given it a pass (Despite the pretty intentional disregard of further data in the same study that disproves the entire premise of the article) but the author made some pretty extreme generalizations an…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 09:23 PM
1

Can we also point out that OKCupid is NOT representative of the entire population of women? I mean, come on, if you're basing the entirety of your article on stats culled from OKC and no where else then you're kind of starting from a flawed place anyways.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 08:31 PM
7

You're right, we're better.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 04:54 AM
18

Last time I checked I was also a man.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 03:40 AM
13

Pardon me, while I agree that tomek is a little dickhead, can you please not slur my sexual orientation while insulting him? Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 03:26 AM
1

I contribute when the topic is worthy of contributing to, not a bunch of neckbeardy whining like this bullshit. Topics like the disparity of punishment for identical crimes between women and men, how the outsourcing of manual labor jobs are disproportionately affecting men, and the presumption of guilt when men are accused of rape are all things that I would love to talk about. Sadly, that stuff is rarely ever discussed rationally, so I snark on occasion. Sue me. But thanks for the birthday wish…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 10:06 PM
1

So I guess you've never seen The Man Show?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 03:50 PM
12

Wow, those Kutcher PSA's are fucking sexist as all hell. Fuck that talentless loser. Being concerned about sex trafficking and sex workers is a noble idea, but how exactly is making vaguely related PSA's that look like they were produced by Funny Or Die helping the situation? Or over-exaggerating it? Why not just give that money to an underfunded organization that is already working on the problem? Oh, that's right, because this isn't about helping sex traffic victims, it's about vanity. You hav…
/r/MensRights02/07/11 05:40 PM
0

They certainly have their crazies, but not all of them are crazy. There is a lot of anger, and loneliness on r/mensrights and, this being the internet, sometimes that anger and loneliness can lead to some extreme viewpoints. But I don't think everyone there is unreasonable, and a lot of them don't actually post, just lurk. One would hope that if I have something of value to say, one of the reasonable folks over there will read it. I don't post for karma, i mean come on that would be silly. I pos…
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:17 AM
0

I have no problem engaging people that I disagree with. Ignoring people that feel different than you isn't going to solve any problems.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:45 AM
1

And when women rape its the fault of the women who rape. Period. Not sure how pointing out the obvious makes me a scumbag.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 01:14 PM
2

Nope. It's the fault of the men who rape. Period. The r/mensrights downvote vortex is hilarious.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 12:36 PM
-5

By men.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 04:04 AM
8

Who are you kidding, no he won't.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 05:31 PM
2

And what would a Mens Studies course consist of?
/r/MensRights22/05/11 05:31 PM
1

Uhhh, just about every comment in this post.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:28 AM
-4

Because most of the Reddit variety of MRA's aren't looking for equality in the sexes they're looking to stick it to women.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 12:47 AM
1

Not all serious body builders and fitness enthusiasts are 'lunks' and I didn't see anything in that story that suggested anyone at Planet Fitness thought they were. There are lunks at every gym, and they can be very pushy and judgmental and no one, especially the serious bodybuilders like them. And my gym does in fact have a dress code for men and women, and it does ban overly sexy clothing (booty shorts and revealing shirts etc) and there are signs. My female friend said that there are signs, w…
/r/MensRights15/05/11 09:15 AM
-7

The only reason this was made into a MR issue us because it was a woman manager. Pretending otherwise is just being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 09:07 AM
3

Would you tell a woman that her boyfriend was cheating on her?
/r/MensRights04/05/11 04:50 AM
4

She was very clearly referring to this subreddit and not the entire movement, but you twisted her words to make it seem like she was. And I don't think she is entirely wrong because this reddits personality is very needlessly hostile to anything having to do with feminism. That's a pretty big indication that any attempts at marrying the two schools of thought would be pretty halfhearted and in-genuine.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 04:28 PM
4

OP very clearly took what she said, posted it wildly out of context with the intention of inciting people in this subreddit against another. And this subreddit has a notorious habit of doing that.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 04:15 PM
-3

That's... not what she said at all. She said that someone who claimed to be a MRA couldn't be a feminist. And, uh, she's probably right. Especially considering that you just completely misrepresented what she said and slandered an entire school of thought based on your flawed and biased perception of one persons opinion.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 08:27 AM
-1

Hmmm, a group of people in Germany organizing for the sole purpose of demonizing another group of people. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights09/04/11 08:58 PM
2

My friends grandmother once told me that the internet would be the downfall of our society because people from different societies should not mix on a regular basis because everything will become the same and tradition and history will die and the races will mix more than they already do. Sometimes grandma's words of wisdom are not very wise.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 09:10 PM
11

This is clearly fake, guys, come on.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:07 PM
0

Fuck you. Read that.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 11:57 PM
3

Nope. No homophobia anywhere on this subreddit. :P
/r/MensRights28/03/11 02:21 AM
3

FYI, I'm a dude. And I'd like to thank you for legitimizing my point.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 02:05 AM
2

Uhm. I'm a feminist who is denouncing shitty feminists, and I've done so in the past. Start denouncing some of the shittier things that some of your, lets say, overly enthusiastic members say and you can play that game. Until then you're just being a snide douche. Women aren't the enemy. Men aren't the enemy. Assholes are the enemy.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:11 AM
3

Not really. There are, unfortunately, some feminists that think that way, but not all of them. Turning feminists into the enemy is another reason that your subreddit is looked down upon.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 12:56 AM
2

I think the negative reaction so many people have to this subreddit is because so many of you seem to be unwilling to admit that some, not all by any means, but some of your membership can be awfully sexist and homophobic. Jut as feminists need to admit that some of their number are insane, you need to knowledge that your own movement isn't without its blemishes. Are some of these people trolls? Probably. Trolls are a fact of life on the internet and you're not really ever going to escape that. …
/r/MensRights27/03/11 11:04 PM
1

Not a real feminist.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 05:39 AM
2

That's what sexism does, it infantilizes women and teaches them that they need to act like this in order to get by. I always kind of chuckle to myself when this reddit yells 'reverse sexism'. It's a such a silly word with no meaning. Most of the things that are being discussed here aren't cases of women exerting some kind of mythical power over men, but rather good old fashioned sexism of the variety of women are not as capable as men so should be held to a looser standard. Sexism hurts everyone…
/r/MensRights15/03/11 06:21 AM
-2

Scott Adams is a feminist... just saying.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 06:02 AM
1

I think their sentences should be comparable. Its the same crime, they just went about it in different ways. However, the man will probably get a harsher sentence because he did it multiple times, which is understandable. And I don't buy that all of the women were duped. If he was using fake pictures and promising them dates, they were basically pimping out their children for their own benefit.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 05:03 PM
-4

That doesn't even make sense.
/r/MensRights25/02/11 06:01 AM
2

The problem with this quote is the fact that if a woman chooses to not have a baby, the only body that is affected in her own. If a man chooses to not have a baby, the only body that is affected is the woman's. I'm not suggesting that we shouldn't give the mans wishes more weight, but suggesting that a man should have the right to force a woman to have an abortion is ludicrous. Like it or not, when a man has sex with a woman he is taking the risk that a baby might be conceived. This is not a new…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 11:26 PM
-1

If someone said it on Reddit it MUST be true.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 05:12 AM
2

Remember everyone, pics or it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 02:21 AM
4

What are we doing to our children when we suggest that getting left off a block from their house is mortal danger? You know how I got to and from Kindergarten when I was a kid? I fucking walked. Granted, it was 3 blocks, but still. Its not as if the bus kicked them off while still moving into the center of a pack of rabid flesh-starved wolves. Jesus, we're raising a bunch of Chicken Little's. Yes, the dad had the right to be angry, of course he did. But lets put this into a little bit of perspec…
/r/MensRights12/02/11 08:08 PM
2

The word "equal" suggests that one is lesser or greater than the other. The ability to have children is not an inequality, it's a difference. I really don't think you have any idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 12:01 AM
2

Two people can be different and still be equal. I'm not sure how the ability to have children makes women less equal then men. Your points do not make sense.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 09:28 PM
6

tl;dr I'm going to make a bunch of lengthy arguments that do not address the statement that I am responding to.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 08:33 PM
5

The one largest logical fallacy in your thesis is the fact that while there always will be and always should be gender roles that does not mean that one specific gender must consistently conform to those roles. And the existence of gender roles is not mutually exclusive to the existence of equality for both genders.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 08:09 PM
1

You're assuming that she wants to help the "Mens Rights Movement".
/r/MensRights08/02/11 08:10 PM
0

I don't understand this. I talk to kids all the time (at work, and when I'm out shopping in public) and I've never once had anyone even give me a sideways glance, much less accuse me of being creepy or a pedo. I just have a lot of trouble believing that every mother in America is assuming that every man that talks to her child is a pedo. Have you thought of asking the people in your life that you trust for an honest assessment of your behavior and body language in public? Its possible that you a…
/r/MensRights07/02/11 03:25 AM
0

Uhm, you sure about that? It reads to me that that is exactly what he's saying.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 08:10 PM
3

Ultimately anyone with half a brain knows that aside from being a simply abhorrent idea, it is also not going to work. Rape and sexual molestation has less to do with the physical ability to force sex on someone and way more to do with the mental desire to force sex on someone. There isn't any way to castrate that.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 08:32 PM
2

Is this proof that women are gold diggers (which I'm fairly certain you're trying to insinuate) or just evidence that men and women have different priorities? Personally, I would probably not date someone who was unemployed (However if I was dating them when they lost their job I would stick with them) not because I want his money, but because I want someone who has their shit together. A job isn't always proof of that, clearly, but its a good start.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 04:08 PM
-2

I think it's pretty much th smartest response yet.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 07:49 AM
8

just because you're in MR doesn't mean you should be clutching at reasons to feel wronged. I see this is your first time to r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 02:24 AM
5

Power. The same reason some pervy older guys go after young girls. Its always about power and control no matter what gender is doing the raping.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 08:16 PM
-3

That is completely absurd. It is NOT the same thing. Your rights are not being taken away. I'm so fucking tired of you guys thinking that the amount of money that you should invest in your child's life should be dependent on how much fucking time you get to see them. Fuck you, you selfish prick, this is about providing for your children, not a fucking time share in Cabo.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 12:37 AM
-2

I'm not a troll, I'm just tired of you guys on r/mensrights always blaming other people for your problems. If there is a disparity in the law work to fix it, don't whine and bitch about it while you call all women cunts and wallow in your childish persecution complexes.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 11:58 PM
-2

When fathers spend the same amount of time and energy raising their children as most mothers do they can complain about the money. Until that happens though, you're the cunt in this equation.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 10:46 PM
-4

Yes, how DARE you be expected to pay for your children. Women are such cunts.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 09:09 PM
-7

Yeah, cause I'm sure she won the fucking lottery when she got stuck with you as her babydaddy. There are always two sides to every dysfunction.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 05:59 PM
1

So what's to stop a man from having as many children as he can in order to get larger and larger raises? Where do we draw the line? And who decided how much people should get paid? The government? That's getting really close to a pretty heinous form of Socialism. Tell me how this gets applied practically that doesn't involve the government telling me how much different types of people should get paid.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 06:52 AM
1

What about if a man's children die? Does he take a pay cut?
/r/MensRights06/01/11 07:14 AM
0

But while I may not have children, I have an ailing mother that I help support. Does that mean I would be exempt from taking a pay cut? Or is raising children the only burden that can earn you more money? And what about a single mother? Does she get a raise if she is supporting a few children on her own, or do only men get the family bonus?
/r/MensRights06/01/11 06:22 AM
0

But why should two people doing the same job be paid differently because one chose to have a family? Why should I be paid less because I chose not to have children?
/r/MensRights06/01/11 05:44 AM
1

There is a perfectly good reason why men are paid more, and it isn't discrimination, as you nutty feminists insist. It is because men, while no more important as people than women, are the naturally-assigned bread-winners and supporters of families, and thus need more of a chance to make enough money for that purpose. So single men who do not have children or families should take pay cuts then, right?
/r/MensRights06/01/11 03:26 AM
2

Well, so far 50% of you don't seem to see a problem with that.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 05:47 AM
0

The defining movie will be called "The Burning Easy Chair".
/r/MensRights05/01/11 05:24 AM
-1

This is an incredibly wise post. I'm shocked its not being downvoted.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 08:44 AM
-1

I know the difference between the two, asshole. Child support is often not enough to cover the costs of being a single parent, especially if there are young kids involved who require expensive childcare. Even more so if the women was always a stay at home mother and would be unable to get a high enough paying job.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 07:03 AM
-11

Normally I think you MensRights guys are a bunch of twats, but yeah, that's some fucked up phrasing that is clearly intended to make him out to be a bad guy. I think the one and only area that I will ever agree with you guys on is on the whacked amounts of money that trophy wives get from rich husbands. Its different if you're a stay at home mom and have little to no ability to raise your children, but these women don't deserve nearly as much as they always seem to be given.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 12:59 AM
-9

Or, you know, looking out for their children.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 06:25 AM
3

What are you doing at work that gives you enough surprise erections that this is more than an isolated incident???
/r/MensRights15/12/10 04:17 AM
1

I hate to break it to you, but this isn't because of feminism, it's because of sexism. A lot of men refuse to believe that women are capable of the same kind of evil and horror that man are, so its hushed up and explained away. NOT by women, but by men. This women is clearly evil, and she deserves to be locked away in the same hole that men who commit this kind of crime are sent to. I don't know any feminists that would disagree with me, and if one did, they would be wrong.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 08:24 PM
1

I honestly think I'm going to find out you all are trolling the internet hard. Fighting for your rights? Fucking seriously? And you gave me proof of nothing. You gave me opinion. Its hard to have substance to an argument when you're arguing with children. Your world view is so insanely asinine that even if I had a 1000 page document completely disproving your "facts" you would put your fingers in your ears and cry about the inch of skin that your mothers cruelly took from you. I'm not arguing wi…
/r/MensRights15/08/10 07:30 AM
0

haha, I didn't know I was trying to hide my contempt for you all. haha. Don't worry though, it got lost in the churn
/r/MensRights14/08/10 02:48 PM
0

Uh, okay, I will keep telling myself what reality is and not live in a fantasy world of my own making where I'm the put upon victim of evil women overlords who want to take my penis away from me.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 04:39 AM
-1

I doubt it. And this isn't a debate. Frankly, I'm embarrassed for you.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 03:35 AM
0

Actually, I never made any claims one way or the other regarding laws that favor men over women. I simply asked you for examples and found the given examples wanting. And for the last fucking time, male circumcision and female circumcision are not analogous. If you want to have something done to you that is comparable to female circumcision think castration, not the removal of a small little bit of skin that has a marginal if even noticeable effect on your ability to have sex.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 03:24 AM
2

The male foreskin is not analogous to a finger, but whatever, that's a pointless argument because I've already said elsewhere that male circumcision is stupid and pointless.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 10:53 PM
2

My point is, anyone with half a brain and access to google can find a study or a fact that "proves" their point by pounding it into place. But you're still using a logical fallacy. namely, you think one or two instances of disparity (I'm going to concede that they exist to prove a point, even if I don't think they're really there) proves that society is actively punishing men in favor of women. Its simply not the reality. You are basing your opinion on emotion and anecdotal experience, not fact.…
/r/MensRights13/08/10 10:32 PM
0

Not all feminism is created equally. The man-hate variety is just as stupid and whatever this woman-hate thing you all are doing here is.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 10:06 PM
4

You can play the sad victim all you want, but everything you listed are responses to legal disparities that favored men over women (With the exception of the Selective Services Act which I agree should include women). You are framing your arguments with the same faulty and disingenuous 'logic' that homophobes use when they suggest that laws protecting gays and lesbians from discrimination constitutes giving them 'special rights'. Its a childish and myopic way to look at it, and its you cramming …
/r/MensRights13/08/10 03:19 PM
-1

I'm not avoiding the issue, I'm refusing to allow you to frame the discussion with your warped and biased point of view. I've already acknowledged that circumcision = bad. You are avoiding the fact that while you may have gotten a shitty deal in life, you can still function sexually, even if its as you say at a reduced level. Women who are circumcised are incapable of anything but pain and tears. But your refusal to even acknowledge that is a clear sign of your self-centered misogyny. Your dick …
/r/MensRights13/08/10 03:09 PM
0

Why would anyone want to argue this? Its just silly to try. You're not posting facts, you're posting opinion. This is the same kind of pseudo-fact list that is used by racists and homophobes to justify their bigotry. You take either anecdotal evidence or a stereotype, add in a sprinkle of fact, a touch of irrationality and a whole lot of bias and TA-DA! Look! Look how right I am!
/r/MensRights13/08/10 02:17 PM
-4

It sucks that your dick is broken. I'm sorry you had a shitty circumcision. But whatever your personal experiences are does not mean that the rest of the world shares them. My dick works just fine and I was circumcised. As I said elsewhere though, we do agree that it is a procedure that should be stopped.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 02:04 PM
-1

Of course I was. And I already said that I wasn't a fan of the process. I never said it was a necessary procedure. Its archaic and silly. It still is not nearly as horrific as female circumcision. And that's not a result of whatever bullshit indoctrination you losers are trying to suggest I'm a victim of, its simple medical fact. And 'misandry'? Oh for gods sake, I'm a fag. I love me some men. Fat, skinny, gay, straight, smart, dumb, I love them all. Are there times when men can be undervalued i…
/r/MensRights13/08/10 01:52 PM
-5

My argument is that you're a fucking moron. OMG! Women are CLEARLY favored by the law because they can't have their clit chopped off but men can have a small patch of skin taken from them! Call the ACLU! Its like gender apartheid! Removing a centimeter of skin is not even close to the same thing as removing half of a child's genitals. When they start cutting off your dick get back to me, until that time fuck off with this stupid sexist bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 06:43 AM
5

OMG, seriously? Ever heard of Charlie Sheen? Seriously dude, either you're a really really good troll or a fucking 10 on the Asperger's scale.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 06:16 AM
-3

What laws legislatively favor women over men?
/r/MensRights13/08/10 04:29 AM
1

Newsflash. Most women are bitches. Most men are assholes. Because most people in general suck. Women aren't worse than men. Grow the fuck up, just because that hot chock doesn't want to fuck your whiny ass doesn't mean she's a spoiled brat.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 02:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter