TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

scottevil110 Archive

View 1 post and 37 comments by scottevil110 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

scottevil110/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:47 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Awesome kid, not pussy pass. I don't think you can play the pussy pass on another girl.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/15 08:15 PM
1

This is in no way a pussy pass, denied or otherwise. At no point does anyone but this OP even mention that she's female. That aside, though, it's hilarious listening to British people in heated arguments.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/15 07:46 PM
10

To be fair, the story linked here says she was "pressured" into an affair. Still equally horseshit, just wanted to clarify.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/15 07:06 PM
7

Wouldn't they? It's a pretty civilized country.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 08:22 PM
124

I can only assume she'll be placed on the sex offender registry?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 06:50 PM
0

No one's talking about punishing someone for failing to get a conviction. That's completely different than it being proven that you completely made it up. That should have no bearing on an actual victim being able to come forward.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/15 06:18 PM
1

And you might even be right about that, but I still insist that it does not explain the difference in life expectancy. We're also a country that's incredibly pro-Christian, are we not? And yet there's no correlation in religion and life expectancy.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:36 PM
1

Yeah, it might be, actually. Human biology can vary pretty widely from area to area, as evolution has necessitated it. It's certainly more likely than your explanation of "They're too poor to oppress men", which neglects all of the other ridiculously poor countries where this isn't the case. You feel like Somalia has a good strong program going to keep women alive for 3 years longer than men? Now, if you could show that the richer a country was, the greater the probability would be that women wo…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:42 AM
1

So, just to be clear, you believe that the discrepancy in life expectancy is because of a systematic societal bias against men that persists across ALL cultures and through all of human history. You believe that this manifests itself in the fact that men get hurt on the job more (even though an astoundingly miniscule % of men die this way), and the fact that men somehow have worse health care (even though even men who are in good health STILL die at a younger age). You don't think it's possible …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:28 AM
1

Why? Why must there be a reason? 40 million people, out of over 3 billion men. So barely 1% of men live in a place where they actually outlive men, and that's enough for you to decide that there's something going on here? Nevermind that those countries have basically nothing in common. What is YOUR explanation for why those countries have this abnormality?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:04 AM
1

More along the lines of generations upon generations of statistics spanning the entire globe. Go ahead and do the math. Remove all of the variables that you claim are the reason men live shorter lives, and get back to me.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:30 AM
0

My apologies, I often use "guys" as a collective noun for a group of people of mixed or unknown gender.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:14 AM
1

That in a world of over 200 countries, there are going to be a small handful where things don't line up with the rest of the world? Listen to your damn self, man. 4 countries out of 200. 2%. You are taking literally 2% of countries and saying they prove something against the other 98%.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:12 AM
-1

Sorry, there's more than one of you. I forgot you probably weren't reading each others things.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:05 AM
-5

We're just going to have to disagree on this one, guys. This is misguided. Just like on the feminist side, when you cry foul at every last thing, even when the facts don't support it, you do a disservice to the cause as a whole.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:01 AM
-3

And I'm done with this sub. I can't stand those feminists, but they had a point. You guys really are every bit as absurd as they are. Science proves you wrong on this. End of story.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:44 AM
-4

You guys are every bit as bad as the feminists who are over there saying that it's society's fault they aren't scientists. You're grasping at straws here. I'm a man, and a proud one, but I'm also a scientist, and you are trying to find some feminist agenda in what has been a natural occurrence since the beginning of fucking time. Men do not live as long. This is true around the entire world, in all cultures, even the ones that treat women like animals. This has been true long before there ever W…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:42 AM
-2

Holy Jesus...
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:38 AM
0

What's my explanation for the fact that women live longer than men in 97% of countries? That's it's not society, which is pretty well proven by the fact that this is true across basically every culture on the planet.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:37 AM
-6

No, no it doesn't, because it doesn't explain the gap. Men who are completely unaffected by workplace hazards, war, even health problems STILL die younger. Going back to way back up there, left handed people also lead considerably shorter lives. Do you blame this on society as well? Just because it happens doesn't mean that there is some preventable cause for it. Men die younger in the same way that they are 100x more likely to be colorblind. We're just different genetically.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:23 PM
-4

Jesus Christ you guys are starting to sound like creationists. What is there to think about? NONE OF THAT explains why men die younger and have shorter natural life expectancies. Just saying ways that men have been shit on (which again, I fucking agree with) does not change science and statistics.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:17 PM
-4

Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not jumping on the "women have always had it great" bandwagon. That one is just delusional. I agree that they're doing just fine now, but I'm not about to sit here and pretend like everything was always great.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:04 PM
-6

Look, I'm obviously not going to convince you of anything here, but I'm still right. I DO agree with all of the proposals you've made here. I hate gender-specific anything, so health programs are no exception. Focusing heart health or even breast cancer on solely women is completely pointless and discriminatory. I am somewhat concerned with your statement that "women have rarely if ever had harder lives than men". Shit, even the most misogynist among us would recognize this as clearly false. The…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:38 PM
-6

Sorry, but the facts don't support that. While all of those things are true, they aren't the cause for the difference life expectancy. Firstly, workplace accidents are such a small percentage of the mortality of men that it hardly makes a dent and can't begin to explain the gap of several years. And this has ALWAYS been the case, long before there even existed any kind of gendered health programs or anything. Hell, even when we DID treat women like complete shit, they STILL lived longer than men…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:22 PM
-5

...go on, educate me. How is society the cause of men having a shorter life expectancy? Next, let's tackle left handed people. They also die younger. Look, I'll be the first to call bullshit when there's something going on that's actually shitting on men, but this isn't it. Men die younger. It is biology. It is not society.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:14 PM
-8

While obviously it could have been worded more eloquently, it's not a completely invalid point. Men naturally die younger. I think a more appropriate question would be: "Ok, so men die younger. What exactly are we supposed to do about it?" The parallel with rape is not valid, because in the case of "women get raped more", that is something that can actually be changed. Men don't die younger because of something wrong with society.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 04:40 PM
1

They're not referring to the college students themselves. They're referring to the young girls who might aspire to be scientists themselves. Again, just playing Devil's Advocate here as far as their side goes. I don't want us to fall into the same pattern of blaming society for our problems.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:03 PM
1

I agree, I think we're saying the same thing here. My point is that I'm not going to start trying to find some mystical reason to explain why there isn't a perfect 50/50 split in engineering or teaching or anything else. People are free to do what they want. If they don't want to do those things, then it's not my business to care why. Are you saying that we SHOULD be doing the same thing, just the other way? Because that I disagree with. Fighting fire with fire is not an answer here. The goal, f…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:36 PM
6

I understand what you're saying, but this sounds too much like picking and choosing to me. The feminists could make the same argument, that not having enough women in high-profile science careers is leaving young girls with no role models in those fields, and they'd be right. You are likewise right that a lack of male teachers likely leads to a lack of role models for boys. However, that's not justification for instituting some kind of legal gender discrimination (either way) for the purpose of …
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:59 PM
45

I disagree strongly with this. This is just affirmative action, only the other way for once. It's still just as detrimental. If we're shooting for gender equality, which I think BOTH sides mostly are, making your hiring decisions based on nothing but gender is no better when it's men than when it's women. EDIT: Holy shit, it's my first cake day!
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:06 PM
1

Ha ha, don't worry, I won't be run off.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:06 AM
1

This turned into quite the discussion. I was unaware of the existence of /r/mensrants. I'll check into it and see if other stuff fits better there in the future.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:15 PM
0

The reason I personally object to it is kind of two-fold. Firstly, it completely discounts all the work that people who don't consider themselves feminist have put into getting reproductive freedom for everyone. Secondly, I'm tired of "reproductive health care" being painted as solely a female issue. Yeah, I'm slightly bitter, no doubt, but why must everything be put in the light of a gender-based issue? Do we not all care about reproductive freedom?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:14 PM
3

If we take a poll about the general feeling about the Holocaust amongst MRAs, and then a poll amongst the feminists about their feelings on MRAs, I might be able to statistically prove that being feminist is equal to being Hitler.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:52 PM
1

Fair viewpoint. I often get to hear about how if you want something to look good, a woman has to be involved, so I took it as the old "Men have no sense of style" line. Yours is an equally valid interpretation, though, I agree.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:02 AM
0

Ha ha, it's so funny because we're all stupid and have no sense of taste! Try putting the same sign up about women on the drill bit aisle at Home Depot and watch how hilarious it suddenly isn't.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:44 AM
1

I remember seeing a sign in college on the bus that said "94% of OU Men agree that a woman has a right to say no." This only made me wonder..."Did 6% of people essentially say that rape is kind of ok?" But seriously, this is more of the Facebook plague. "If we spread awareness, then we've done something to help!"
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter