~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | Edmonton Journal letters: Hold women accountable too | scratch_043 | /r/MensRights | 11/07/13 02:28 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Woman falsely accuses man of defiling 3 y.o. daughter [Paywall, body in comments]She walked around pantsless for months after each trip to the bathroom? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 08/11/14 10:09 PM |
| 1 | Why men sit with their legs apart. (spoilers: it's not "privilege", nor simply your balls)Loved it, made me chuckle on my lunch break, thanks. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/13 01:54 AM |
| 14 | This is what it sounds like when a woman is trying to get a man shot by the policeZimmerman has been pulled over at least twice for speeding since his acquittal. At what point is he allowed to claim police harassment and file suit/charges? | /r/MensRights | 10/09/13 03:22 PM |
| 3 | Highly biased child protective services interviewGrimace over there made my blood boil. Depending on what jurisdiction she is in, she could be fired and all of her cases reviewed, if this proof is brought to the right officials. Giving false information like this is a huge breach of trust, and she should know better. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/13 03:43 PM |
| 0 | Do you believe paternity tests should be mandatory for all births?I respectfully disagree. I have two daughters, one of which I'd from my wife's previous relationship. Although the paternity of either has never been in doubt, they are both 'Mine'. I don't think it is necessary to make it mandatory thing. Option that can be requested by the 'father of record' and cannot be refused by the mother, absolutely. I think that if it's necessary to get the test done, there are already problems with the relationship, and it would be a necessary step. Edit to add: Also, … | /r/MensRights | 16/08/13 05:54 PM |
| 2 | So it seems that feminists are planning to "crash" a speaker that is being put on by men's rights EdmontonYeah, good idea. Tell you what, go tell the feminists that we want a truce, and we should go for true equality, see how that goes. Modern Feminism isn't about equality, it is about getting the best possible outcome for their side, at the expense of ours. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/13 05:56 PM |
| 0 | Invite to feminists: come debate with Men's Rights Edmonton! AVFM News and Activism special broadcast tomorrow (Thursday Night) at 9PM eastern time. Do not miss it!I think that mainstream media would be better suited than blogtalk though. I mean, not many people know of its existence. Know I didn't until this post. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/13 02:32 PM |
| 5 | “These posters, I think, are quite troubling ... What’s been done to transform an anti-sexual-assault campaign into a rape-apologist campaign is just deeply offensive.” Edmonton JournalGot a reply from the paper, they are unwilling to print a letter without first and last name. I also need to shorten it by at least a hundred words, haha. Dear Mr. XXXXXXX, Thank you for your message. Unfortunately, we cannot consider your letter for publication >without your name on it; we require a first and last name, or two >initials and a last name. If you’d like to resubmit your letter >following those guidelines, please do so to >[email protected]. We also do ask that letters be… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/13 05:12 PM |
| 2 | “These posters, I think, are quite troubling ... What’s been done to transform an anti-sexual-assault campaign into a rape-apologist campaign is just deeply offensive.” Edmonton JournalHave edited the above to remove the bit accusing the author of pandering. Replying instead of editing, to maintain integrity of my post, Do you think I am more likely to be published if I give them a TL;DR version? | /r/MensRights | 10/07/13 03:46 PM |
| 4 | “These posters, I think, are quite troubling ... What’s been done to transform an anti-sexual-assault campaign into a rape-apologist campaign is just deeply offensive.” Edmonton JournalGoing to send this to the editor of the journal shortly, just want to get some opinions first. I write this letter in response to today's article written by Andrea Sands. Firstly, to address the copyright claim. On September 29, 2011, the Copyright Modernization Act has passed into law. Simply put, the fair dealing amendment in Section 29 of Bill C-11 expands the first criteria for evaluating fair dealing - the Purpose of the Dealing - to include education, and parody or satire, in addition to r… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/13 03:43 PM |
| 1 | “These posters, I think, are quite troubling ... What’s been done to transform an anti-sexual-assault campaign into a rape-apologist campaign is just deeply offensive.” Edmonton JournalAFAIK they are not, and are protected. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/13 02:47 PM |
| 6 | “These posters, I think, are quite troubling ... What’s been done to transform an anti-sexual-assault campaign into a rape-apologist campaign is just deeply offensive.” Edmonton JournalMr Harlan, I am a resident of the publication coverage area of the paper that printed this article this morning. I wonder if I might have permission from you to use COTWA as a reference in a letter to the editor. I would also recommend that others do the same, you do not have to be a subscriber to the paper to send an email, and the greater the number of responses, the better the chance of getting through to them. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/13 02:44 PM |
| 3 | IRS is ignoring my signed court orderTIL: Americans don't have the ability to record phone calls. Strange, because I thought it was the same as here (Canada). Here it is perfectly legal to record any conversation, so long as it is known to one of the parties involved. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/13 01:44 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter