TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

screw_empires Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by screw_empires on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

It was never about "toxic masculinity", that's just something they morphed into a term to avoid backlash. In reality, they are just calling masculinity itself toxic.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 06:32 AM
6

The notion isn't outdated. Being outdated assumes it was correct at some point, which it never was. It's just plain wrong.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 11:58 AM
16

Because, in reality, it is a movement for female supremacy, not equality. The kkk "White power!" is very similar to the feminist "Girl power!", isn't it?
/r/MensRights20/09/24 05:58 AM
1

May not be worser than the "modern" values, but it's still far from ideal. And I wouldn't say that the woman is actually in any way submissive to the man in traditionalism. She just pretends to be to manipulate him easier.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 05:38 PM
3

Help me with what? Help me to get enslaved by some woman?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 08:49 AM
3

Conservatism is also the man being the woman's servant. They're just smarter about it and are more subtle, and use it as a way to lure you in. Also, I hate all religions with a passion.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 08:48 AM
3

Yeah, sure. Why the fuck would I take the "deal" when I'm already well aware of all the overwhelming facts that it's not worth it? When pigs fly!
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:22 PM
3

I don't want a girl, and "nice" girls don't exist.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:00 PM
5

I don't. I want way more than that. As a matter of fact I'm hyper-romantic, demisexual even (it means someone who can't get aroused without genuine feelings for someone besides lust) The problem is that women nowadays don't want to offer more than sex, and if you want more they'll call you patriarchal.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:32 PM
2

I won't be. Lack of a woman is what allows a man to grow his wealth, and the only thing women have to offer, I can get cheaper and more consistently from a sex doll. And how will being a slave to some bitch make me happy, exactly? Especially considering the fact that I value my freedom and dignity? Honestly, I'd feel more alone with a female partner than single. That's because I'm aware that the truly loving and caring in relationships with women is one-sided. She wouldn't piss on me if I was on…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:13 PM
10

Fuck that. I'm not going to break my back to be a servant for a "cute girl". MGTOW for life!
/r/MensRights13/09/24 04:42 PM
44

This is bias, exploitation and discrimination towards men, and fuck you! Biology is that women live longer then men, so if we are to go by biology, women should have to retire later than men, so men get to have the same amount of time in retirement. Women getting to live longer and retire earlier isn't equality. (And that's if you assume that women living longer is biological, which I doubt it is.)
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:50 AM
4

*Both genders, not "all" genders. There are only 2.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 10:10 AM
5

Also when you consider the fact that if a smaller and weaker man hits a stronger and bigger man, no one will have a problem with him getting beat for it. It's only when we replace the smaller man with a woman that they do.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 06:04 AM
6

Well, we actually do, because there's a surprisingly high amount of people who think that banging a child is perfectly ok if the child is a boy.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 07:50 AM
16

Excuse me, wtf? And they still say that feminism is not a hate group, but for equality... Feminism should be treated like the kkk.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:29 AM
7

Seconded. He ain't.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:55 AM
-2

Ok...
/r/MensRights04/09/24 01:19 PM
7

"You would think on a men's forum you would be addressing mEn'S VioLEncE & oPPresSIon" So you want us to make a forum for men's rights just so instead of talking about men's rights to belittle, villainize and put down men? Nah, never, and we need less of that in this world, not even more. We're here FOR men, not against men. The fact that you feel entitled to have us working against our own interest to further demonize men for you instead is very telling.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:36 PM
-4

Ok...but that's not what they were reffering to.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:14 PM
4

What does that have to do with the topic?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:08 PM
9

Fgm happens only in remote middle eastern cults and is acknowledged as bad. Mgm happens in every major western hospital and seen as ok or even necessary. And the same logic can be applied back to you: just because you claim that women are oppressed and men's violence against women is the biggest problem doesn't mean any of that is true.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 11:27 AM
19

Women aren't oppressed and men don't have "all the rights". From the moment we are born we are strapped to a torture table to have our genitals cut (circumcision), and that is legal everywhere to do to boys but ilegal to do to girls. As just one of the countless examples. Where is our right to genital integrity if we have all the rights? And why do women have it when we don't if they're so oppressed?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 09:18 AM
40

*good, not confident. Just because you're confident doesn't mean you're actually good.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 02:14 AM
28

And then they wonder why those boys grow up to hate women and feminism as grown men. It deeefinitely has nothing to do with the way they were treated by women and how feminism is literally the cause of that.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 02:07 AM
15

You can go older than that actually. The 1848 "declaration of sentiments".
/r/MensRights02/09/24 09:55 PM
1

You have a point there. But I think the country would collapse on its own before that can happen.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 10:10 AM
6

Why not? If they think it's so bad here with us men, then why shouldn't they go to a place where there are no men? And what does it have to do with the middle east?
/r/MensRights01/09/24 09:29 PM
3

Nah, it's a dispute over some old borders. By the old borders, Egypt doesn't have the piece of land that sticks out to the south, but it has the bigger piece of land to the east of it between the old and new border. Its southern neighbour claims the new border, but Egypt claims the old straight line border, so that piece of land Egypt has that sticks to the south is claimed by neither: not because it is undesirable, but because giving it up awards a bigger piece of land to the east.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 09:02 PM
5

There's piece of land between Egypt and its southern neighbour that is claimed by neither. They could go there. There's also Antarctica.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 07:43 PM
2

Just because there are some similarities or they took some communist ideals afterwards doesn't mean the communists created the movement. If this was a destructive force meant to be unleashed in the west, then why was feminism a thing in communist countries too? Also, they're not pro equality in everything even in scenarios where that wouldn't be equality like you're saying. They wouldn't want those things anymore if it was men who benefited from them. Because their real goal is not gender commun…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 06:52 PM
7

It does work like that, but it's not from the communists. Communist feminism was also a thing and was pretty damn toxic, and feminism is also older than communism.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 04:28 PM
23

Telling a guy that he should subscribe to onlyfans isn't good advice.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 01:32 PM
1

I'm the same as you. I think it is called demisexuality. But not everyone is like that apparently.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:46 PM
5

If you hate it, then act like it, cause that's the way to stop it. Don't just hang your head low and say "yeah, this is how it is" and do nothing to oppose it, not even verbally, cause that's how you accept it. Actions matter, not what you think to yourself.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 09:39 AM
13

Stop bullshitting me. It's social engineering. It only continues to be this way if you continue to accept it.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 08:07 PM
4

Correct. But say intelligence of men, not brains of men, cause brains can be interpreted to include emotions and therefore intentions and actions.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 05:09 PM
11

Treated as disposable* There's a difference. We are unappreciated, not unneeded.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 04:31 PM
7

BUT their intentions are even more evil than we think they are here.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 04:22 PM
3

Exactly. Feminists are a bunch of liars and their narrative can't survive even the most mild questioning, hence why they resort to censorship. Meanwhile, the problems we talk about are actually real, so we can actually back it up in a debate.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 11:49 AM
3

Exact sciences are not the same as philosophy.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 10:13 PM
3

Exact sciences are not the same as philosophy.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 10:13 PM
7

You can't prove it, and even if you could it doesn't make it any better, and anything less than having these bitches pay the full price for their crimes is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 09:44 AM
2

The word you're looking for isn't vengeance. That implies he did something just as bad to her before. The word is pettiness.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:22 PM
17

No, men are not attracted to women's money and social status. Where the fuck did you get that from? But yes, abuse of power is indeed tolerated when done by women, but not by men.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 07:23 PM
0

Not exactly. They're just the same at the core everywhere, only with different flavours.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 03:06 PM
1

So they lied to us in school? Morții mă-si de treabă, I don't know who to trust anymore.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:40 PM
6

That's how censorship starts, and from censorship comes extremism and dictatorship due to lack of an oppossition and from that come all the atrocities under the sun being just allowed to happen.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:09 PM
1

Prove it. It was like that in communism and was kept after too. We were taught this in history class with supporting evidence.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:59 PM
4

If Russia is egalitarian, then I'm Santa Claus. Russia can literally challange the UK on sexism against men. They even use the same "forced penetration of the victim with a penis" rape definition which allows women to rape men and never get punished for it. And you see how much they care about the lives of their men: not at all. If you want egalitarian, the closest you have to that is Romania, which is the only country I know of that has gender neutral laws by constitution, and that includes mil…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:59 AM
1

This is you:🤡
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:53 AM
2

Thanks for proving yet again that you're a moron. Putin is himself an oligarch. That's not the real ratio, that's just what russian propagandists claim, aka it's a lie. They also claim that Ukraine lost 6000 tanks when it never got its hands on more than 3000 in total including western aid, and yet still has tanks. Uh huh, sure. Your empty words mean nothing. Russia attacked Ukraine in 2014 and attacked it now, and that's it. Get a brain, if you think I'm stupid enough to believe a word a retard…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:48 AM
6

And really? Russia classless? With its oligarchs and cannon fodder peasants? I'm not naive enough as to believe such bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 09:30 PM
2

You're an absolute moron. All you have here is bullshit lies, and the only one I'm seeing being aggressive here is Russia. They're the ones invading another country, fool! and yeah, suuurely the west, that protects free speech and democracy, is the fascist one, uh huh. /s
/r/MensRights18/08/24 09:20 PM
1

Also, moron, Russia is literally one of the closest things we have to a fascist state, is the bully of the region, and given that Russia is also anti-Israel... yeah, Russia is more the nazi in this picture
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:45 PM
1

Could you please fuck off with your ruzzian propaganda? Nazism is anti-jewish genocidal sentiment. There's none of that in Ukraine. And you're supporting a country that does nothing but attack, rob, rape and exploit its neighbours. There's a reason why all eastern Europe chose to leave Russia's sphere when given the chance, and that's because all they did was oppress us in every way you can imagine. Keeping us in poverty, censorship and political persecution by forcing us into communism and also…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:41 PM
26

Oh yeah, and so much for women being "emphatetic". Forgot to say that.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 05:13 PM
30

So basically being able to say "My son was a hero" as a way to pride herself is so much more important to her than her son being alive that she is willing to force him to die in war, and this is her son, the person she is suppossed to care about the most! Let that sink in, how little her own son's life matters to her, that she is so eager to have him murdered for her to say be able to say a few words. She doesn't care about him at all! His death wouldn't even bother her! For all those who think …
/r/MensRights18/08/24 04:29 PM
6

Found the russian bot.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 04:13 PM
1

The average innocent man is who. "You better kneel before women and serve them well, cause if you don't serve them well enough, they will use their power to put a rape accusation on your ass and get your life ruined just like this guy. So get to work to produce respurces to give away to women, slave!" It's not about protecting women and nevermind making justice. It's about having power and control over men.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 06:43 PM
92

Before we're even born. You remember that crap about "Let's see if it's a girl or an abortion", right?
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:32 AM
1

Women only have as much power as the collective of men allow them to. Men have invented, built and maintain all the infrastructure that allows society to exist, and we also have the physical strenght. If we all put our foot down, we'd change this back to common sense in mere days. The problem is that the majority of us aren't aware of the injustice happening. They're not worse than the women who are scumbags, cause afterall only the women here have ill-intent and you can't deny that, but they wo…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 05:28 PM
1

It's really a shame that so many of us just sit back and let them have their way.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 10:25 AM
26

And by catering to all viewers, they really mean catering to everyone but straight white men. If there's a straight white man, he will either be the butt of all jokes and that will be portrayed as funny instead of bullying, or he will be an unreedemable villain who only does evil because he can, and easily defeated by the "diverse" "heroes" or a scary monster.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:15 PM
2

Prosperous my ass, and fuck society. What I keeo trying to tell you is that society is wrong.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 07:14 PM
1

Again, being treated as disposable doesn't mean you are disposable, it just means that the people treating you like that are assholes. The gulf countries? Really? Those are some of the worst possible third world shitholes on this planet.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 06:18 PM
1

We're talking about 1st world countries here. Countries in Europe and North America have less men. And no, there are no succesful countries that practice polygamy. That's bullshit. Name one if you're so sure of yourself. And no, what you say isn't reality. It's anti-male propaganda.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:49 PM
1

Also, Ceaușescu didn't come to power in 1968. He has been in power for all of communism, he got drunk on power in 1968. He ruled well from 1948 to 1968, then realized the true extent of his power and how much he could enrich himself if he abused it after his visit to North Korea, and he got corrupted by power. So with that, Romania quickly underwent a drastic change from a utopian society to a North Korea style dictatorship by 1970 and that lasted until 1989.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:45 PM
1

I'm not trying to say that communism as a whole is good. I'm trying to say that its goal of having people be equally rewarded and the concept that things have value based on their use is good. A shiny rock has no use and it is only desired because of feelings. A car has a practical use, therefore it is objectively more valuable. These values and ideals, when properly implemented, even if through regulations or the time before communism inevitably turns bad, as long as they're respected, make a m…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:39 PM
1

And lets apply the absurd and say that supply and demand is all that matters. It is known that countries that practice polygamy can't prosper. https://youtu.be/zGedwEYNh70?si=A2Qz7A-BSXJh_7j5 It is the monogamous structrure that gives men the motivation to work hard and make the country as great as it is, hence why all successful countries are monogamous, and that's if you disregard the fact that realistically a single man won't be enough to impregnate and raise children with 100 women. We know …
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:33 PM
1

I needed some time to calm down from the sheer ignorance you are displaying. The basic concept of communism literally is total equality, and the idea is to have everything managed in a way where everyone is awarded equally for their work. The goal is good, and it is something we should also strive for, but by other means. The problem, like I said, is that someone has to do that managing, which can only be the goverment, and that leaves the few people in the goverment with a lot of control. Now t…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:24 PM
1

L take. Small-minded.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:08 PM
1

L take. This isn't about feelings, the market is about feelings.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:03 PM
1

And that thing about marxism isn't the argument you think it is. I'm romanian, someone from a post-communist country. I've seen what and how communism does to a country, and I'm a history nut too when it comes to my country, and I have first-hand unfiltered information from people who have seen it all unfold. The problem with communism and marxism isn't the concept of it, or its stated goal, that's actually the good thing about it, which shouldn't be villainised. It's basically equality and meri…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:01 PM
1

Small-minded L take right there. Feelings aren't what make the world function, moron. It's practical use that does. The "market" would have nothing and wouldn't even exist without that.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:42 PM
1

Compared to men, yes. Men invented, built and maintain literally everything. Modern society infrastructure and states that make life so comfortable wouldn't exist without men. Meanwhile, women in Iceland stopped working once to demonstrate that they're needed and the country kept going like nothing happened, proving instead that they aren't needed.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:38 PM
1

Accepting being disposable is becoming easily disposed of. Fuck no! And it's not just men, it's women too. Remember stuff like the white feather movement?
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:35 PM
1

The market is not objective. It's just a reflection of society's feelings, not the objective truth.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:33 PM
1

So you basically base value on society's feelings. And you seriously can't see what's wrong with that? L take.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:32 PM
3

What society thinks isn't the truth. Being treated as disposable doesn't make you disposable, it just makes the people treating you like that assholes, and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:06 AM
5

Fuck you! And they say that women get objectified. No, what objectively gives things value is their use. Men make the world work and are why women don't live in caves and fear wolves, while women do nothing. The fact that useless things are valued doesn't make them valuable, it just proves that people are morons. A car is infinitely more valuable than those stupid rocks called diamonds, even if diamonds are more expensive.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:04 AM
6

He says "How do I explain to him that he is worth less/more disposable than his sister?" That implies that it is true that men are actually truly worth less than women, which is misandrist bullshit. Men are the only reason why the world works, and why women don't live in caves and fearing wolves. Meanwhile, women don't do much.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:00 AM
5

We're not "inherently disposable". We're thought of and treated as such by a bunch of sexist morons. There's a difference.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:56 AM
21

Dude, he isn't worth less than his sister, not at all. He is just perceived as worth less by the biased fucks that we call people in this society. And it is not him that is bad, or worth less, it's the people that say that he is worth less that are bad and worth less. That's the objective truth and that's what you should tell him, minus the profanity.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:50 AM
2

Unimportant? Yes. Cute? Fuck no, disgusting is the word.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 04:08 PM
7

Don't forget about circumcision and the mainstream "men suck balls and are monsters, women are ruling queenz who are somehow being oppressed" a$$ messages.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 01:39 PM
1

That's true, but the original question was if there are countries with good living conditions without mainstream misandry, and you just named those 2 without saying this part.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 09:10 PM
0

Iran and saudi Arabia no longer exist? Did they get nuked?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:24 PM
3

R/thathappened Dude, I live in Romania, a country that many consider third world. With us being in the EU our standards of living are on average way higher than any middle eastern country, yet hardly anyone considers Romania attractive.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:38 PM
2

Those are third world shitholes, not countries with good living conditions.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:49 PM
1

There were quite a few feminist cartoon posters posted here a few months ago that had the woman creating and discovering things in the background while the man did not, with a feminist captioning something along the lines of "But men somehow invented everything, sure."
/r/MensRights03/08/24 11:03 AM
1

You do know. Because he is a man, and that's what men do apparently according to feminists, steal women's work and claim it as their own. Apparently all the world's inventions were invented by women and men just somehow were always able to steal their credit.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 10:42 AM
1

And why would she jump to such a conclusion again?
/r/MensRights03/08/24 10:29 AM
1

And where did the idea that he was going to steal her work come from again?
/r/MensRights03/08/24 10:05 AM
1

Different my ass. You're making excuses. She was already known to be a misandrist. Even if that's the true story, why do you think that was her reaction, if not her hatred and distrust of men? And it's really "funny" how "mental illness" is this "get out of jail free" card, as if that makes the perpetrator any less guilty or the crime any less bad. And it's even more "funny" how "mental illness" only works as an excuse when it's a woman commiting the crime, and suddenly becomes irelevant when it…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 09:25 AM
1

Uh huh, I'm sure that's not just a sad excuse that was made up./s It's pretty obvious that you're not telling the real story. The first results talked about how she stalked him even after the fact. You didn't even mention that. And just the fact that you defend that bitch. Very telling and absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 08:19 AM
1

Men also get targeted for murder specifficaly for their gender. Valerie Solanas shot Andy Warhol, as an example of one that we know was just for gender. I din see any cries about "menicide". Also, a big difference is that she got no punishment for it, as oppressed to men who hurt women. And she's one of the biggest feminist icons too.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 08:34 PM
1

"genital mutilation are also gender-based violence." Why do you never apply this to circumcision? By your own logic, there is a ton of anti-male gender based violence. And no, it isn't as plausible as you think it is. The idea is quite ridiculous, especially in western countries, which are definitely not patriarchal. And yeah, men are 8 times more likely to be victims of homicide, but you have to coin this ridiculous term "femicide" to draw attention away from the majority male victims to give m…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 10:05 AM
1

I recommed the sex robots that Elon is developing, or if you can't wait, pair a locally ran AI with a sex doll.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 09:53 AM
2

You think I give a fuck about third world countries? I live in Europe, and what happens in Kenya or other 3rd world shitholes is not relevant here. You've got a lot more to work on there than gender stuff, and that's not even counting that it's still an assumption. It's not beyond reasonable doubt that the killings could be for other reasons, like being cheated on or just generally being a violent pos towards anyone.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:46 PM
1

And how exactly do you know that it is because they are women? Oh yeah, you don't, you just assumed it is, some for men not being because they are men. Aka, you're making stuff up to paint the situation to your liking.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 11:47 AM
2

No, you see, it only goes one way with these bitches.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 05:06 AM
2

"Women have, for millenia, been targetted, harassed, assaulted, and killed by men for being women, and sadly that number is only increasing in other parts of the world." That's the stupidest and most false thing I've seen today.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 04:45 AM
2

It's wiser to not take either of them.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 04:37 AM
2

Alternatively, you could just stick a knife in it and mash it around. I think that would do it.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:56 AM
3

Why tf did the comment where you clarified that you think circumcision is disgusting and immoral get downvoted? Wtf.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter