TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

scsimodem Archive

View 3 posts and 205 comments by scsimodem on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Never stop what you're doing guys (and girls). This subreddit is a major part of the reason my son is intact. Fortunately, I married a good one, and her response to me not wanting him cut was to defer to my judgement as the one who actually has a penis. Now that we've had time to get attached to him, she can't imagine putting him through such a painful procedure and is very happy with our decision. Edit: That last sentence needed clarification.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 10:07 AM
3

You need some face to face venting time, and I know it will be difficult, but it's for the best. The issue is that you don't trust anybody, so it's time to go over confidentiality. Only four relationships are absolutely protected from subpoena power, meaning not even the government can make them say anything. The first is spousal, but I'm guessing you're not married and even then, it's conditional on your trust in your spouse, as while they can't be compelled the testify, they can choose to. The…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:44 AM
6

Oh, it's better than that. Change the women out for white men, and this is literally the plot to Birth of a Nation.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:25 AM
3

Common law marriage. It goes waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back to when it was possible that the nearest official qualified to marry a couple was too far away for them to afford the trip, so they just decided they were married. What qualifies as common law marriage varies between cultures. Originally, it only theoretically required consummation, though in practice, cohabitation with intention to procreate was what did it.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:14 AM
10

I can't find that information in any of the articles. Source? Edit: Every description says that it's a serum 'derived from the foreskins of Korean newborns,' which seems to indicate that the foreskins themselves are 'all natural.'
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:20 AM
3

And this, WTF? Are the prisons in Missouri private? The prison system has literally nothing to do with it. The justice system isn't obligated to do any work to overturn a known wrongful conviction unless due process was denied. It's incumbent on the defendant to, you know, figure this all out from prison and then file an appeal. It's a hole in the justice system. If a guy visits you in prison and tells you, on tape, that he committed the crime, along with handing you evidence that he did it and …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:02 AM
3

Don't date single mothers as a general rule (there are almost always exceptions). Either she is selfishly unwilling to make a marriage work, even for the benefit of her children, or she has terrible judgement in choosing a father for her children unwilling to make a marriage work. People can change, but when dating, I immediately disqualified single mothers unless and until I found that they either weren't to blame for the circumstances leading to it or had significantly changed since.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:50 AM
9

How can someone read the guys memo and think it's an anty diversity piece? Hmmmmmmmmm...
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:12 AM
2

Assuming it is obviously deliberate, I'd tell her very sternly to unhand my genitals and pay for the food. Upon returning to work, I would inform the manager (how open you are about how much it bothered you depends on the manager) and put a note on her profile in the system that the customer is grabby and will be refused delivery until further notice.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 05:57 AM
1

I thought it was Harambe.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:38 AM
1

normal feminism Normal by what definition? I we take the mean of the modern feminist movement, they still believe in rape culture, the pay gap, and that men can't be raped by women.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:21 AM
2

Do what KiA did to unethical journalists. Send this crap to their advertisers. Any time you see a 'promoted' Tweet, reply with screenshots and send an email to the company and ask if they support Twitter protecting people like this. Gawker got socked in the mouth for millions from that, so much that they had to take down their sponsors page to keep people from calling everybody on the list (half of which weren't even sponsors and we rather mad at being listed as one).
/r/MensRights28/11/17 02:59 AM
6

Nah, they'll just make sperm out of bone marrow. -A thing I've heard actual feminists say.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:53 AM
4

They're actually causing sexism, like actual sexism, in their media with this crap. Used to, I didn't care who the protagonist was in a video game or any form of fiction. Now, when I see a female led franchise, I expect her to be a total bore with no flaws whose opponents never actually pose a serious challenge.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:51 AM
9

Every single game that Anita Sarkesian claims promotes violence against women She claims as the footage clearly shows the game penalizing her for killing those particular women.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:48 AM
2

I don't want there to be any bitterness studies degrees, no matter who it is who is being bitter.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:46 AM
3

MEN COULD BE VICTIMS TOO Is a statement of fact. You're not dragging people down by making the factual claim that they have been the victims of a crime. You're only dragging them down by convincing them that victim is a permanent state or something they are uniquely suited for.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 04:56 AM
7

he must be gay As in, "The only reason a man would complain about a woman tying him up and sucking him off is if he wasn't into chicks. This is the only possible explanation," rather than a myriad of other explanations, like that the guy didn't like her, was already in a committed relationship, believes sex should be confined to marriage, or, horror of horrors, would have been fine with it if she'd asked first, but is uncomfortable with being forced into a sex act.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 04:09 AM
2

And even then, if you can read between the lines, you know everybody knew he didn't do it. If they thought he'd actually raped her, he'd have been executed, not put in prison. They knowingly threw an innocent man in prison because once he'd been accused, there was no way to let him off the hook completely.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:10 AM
10

To fit it with anti-Semitic stereotypes, thus making it even more uncomfortable: The Problem with Jews "Not all Jews are greedy, however, a very large number do think about gentiles, or other Jews, and money, a lot of the time... there is something mercantile about Jews or how they often behave... we have social codes to restrain that behaviour..." "It also has to be said that... Jews have higher bank balances than gentiles and this may incline them to be more tight pursed. But don't worry, I'm …
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:05 AM
1

I gave you an entire web site by a Ph.D. featuring numerous studies, theories, videos, and interviews. You read the TITLE and decided it wasn't worth your time based on a faulty assumption. Once that turned out to be wrong, you read the opening paragraph and then went off on tangents barely even related to the entire web site, assuming you knew what you were talking about. I can't 'clarify my point' about something you refuse to read.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 10:59 PM
1

You're either a troll or the kind of idiot who reads the table of contents of a textbook, then tells the teacher he's leaving the class because he already knows everything. I'm done.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 10:51 PM
1

Well, you can be unconvinced all you want, but- a) It's a real trend. Whether you're an exception or not doesn't disprove the trend. b) A huge chunk of this post shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what he's saying.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 12:38 PM
0

Try reading the whole thing or watching some of his interviews on YouTube. Yes, they duplicate the effect through novelty, but porn allows more novelty than we're biologically made to handle. A kid can see more naked women having sex than somebody 100 years ago would see women period in his entire lifetime. It also rewires your brain and creates new neuropathways so that you associate porn and only porn with arousal to the point that people have trouble getting aroused to have sex with an actual…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:56 AM
1

Dude is an atheist. Not a religious bone in his body.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:49 AM
11

This is Canada. There's a legit possibility this guy gets fined or goes to jail.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:57 AM
-2

https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:54 AM
2

but it's not paid. They say they are doing us a favor, making us understand "how work feels like" That's not what work feels like. What's that word we use for when somebody forces you to work for them against your will and don't pay you for it?
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:45 AM
2

I heard some male feminist on a YouTube stream say that if we would just force gender parity for a few decades, enforcing hard quotas, forcing people by law to do careers they don't want to do and such, that we could then take away the coercion and the parity would remain. His justification was based on a theory that women don't do certain things because they don't see other women doing those things. Edit: Applied that same logic to categories other than gender.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:57 PM
2

and considers the crime of one man worst I'm going to stop you right there. I never said it was worse than any other incident, only more famous and a clear example of the problem. Now stop with the B.S. whataboutism. It's really stupid to say "Why do people bring up [famous thing] instead of talking about [worse thing that nobody's heard of]?" You can be against multiple things at once, and it's a reality of the world that it's easier to have a discussion about things people have actually heard …
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:40 AM
2

I don't agree with what Polanski did, but the situation was fucked up enough that I won't personally condemn the man. He raped a 13 year old girl. I will most certainly condemn him. Do I have to choose only one between the two to condemn? No, but your original statement was that you don't get why people choose to bring up [x], and the reason is because it's a perfectly valid example and it's one that everybody's heard of.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:15 AM
5

but there were more worse and malicious actors at play who don't get nearly the condemnation they deserve. This, though, is a well known case everybody has at least heard of and which people still constantly try to excuse because they like Polanski. None of the above changes that what he did was reprehensible and he should have gone to jail for several years over it. You can bring about other, worse cases, but this is still emblematic of what's going on and something that people have actually he…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 02:44 AM
2

I will never not upvote a reminder of garbage human being Roman Polanski and fellow garbage human being Whoopi Goldberg excusing drugging and anally raping a 13 year old girl as not 'rape rape.'
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:40 AM
7

I think this one goes way beyond a male/female issue, though that is still present. Roman Polanski regularly gets circle jerked by Hollywood, despite the U.S. having a standing warrant for his arrest decades running. Hollywood insiders regularly argue that he's being oppressed and Whoopi Goldberg said on The View that what he did wasn't 'rape rape.' What did he do? He drugged a 13 year old girl with quaaludes and anally raped her while she was helpless...and he's been shameless about it ever sin…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:36 AM
2

And life insurance won't pay out if it's ruled a suicide.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:31 AM
0

No, he's not. The second the police start talking to you, a lawyer is prudent.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:54 AM
2

"You're filming my daughter!" "Your dog, actually. Wait, what are you doing with your daughter to make you so defensive about somebody filming?"
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:58 AM
10

Go Socratic. Don't ask pointed questions. Just let them talk. Wherever possible, rephrase the question to make yourself sound less hostile. For example, "What are you doing to ensure the rights of the accused?" sounds aggressive, and they'll go into PR mode. Asking "What are you doing to protect yourself from potential liability if a student claims to have been falsely accused (cite Nungesser)?" will potentially get you much more useful answers. Most Title IX offices use the motte and bailey inf…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:15 AM
2

Plus, doesn't post-natal abortion date back at least as far as ancient Sparta? In fact, I know that Romans used to leave unwanted newborns outside the city to die of exposure. It was illegal to interfere, but Christian families (pre-Constantine, when Christianity was still illegal throughout the Empire) would sneak out at night to rescue the babies and raise them as their own.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:45 AM
2

I, on the other hand, examine the 'uncomfortable truth' that there's very little difference between newborns and fetuses to conclude that an unborn child is a person deserving of life. The "uncomfortable truth" that infanticide is ok is predicated on the belief that abortion is self-evidently morally acceptable.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:42 AM
2

Can't find the quote now, but I'm pretty sure some smart guy at some point said something like "What is the natural behavior of a democracy? What is the behavior that is good for the survival of a democracy? Are they the same thing?" The behavior that is good for critical infrastructure is to keep cutting edge security. However, if an install goes bad, crap hits the fan, so the behavior it promotes is stagnation.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:14 AM
4

There's a 90 minute video on YouTube (can't access from here) about why you should never talk to the police. The tl;dr is that, even if you have done nothing wrong, are completely truthful, recall everything in perfect detail, and it is all recorded, it is still possible for the D.A. to use what you say to the police against you, but there is absolutely no circumstance under which is will help you. As an example, let's say a mistaken, but trustworthy, witness says you were in a certain place at …
/r/MensRights18/09/17 03:08 AM
3

http://www.womenshealthmag.com/ Hmm, guess it's all taken care of for everybody now.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 02:35 AM
3

By the mid-80s, 48 U.S. states had no-fault divorce laws and most teen suicides are in single parent homes, IIRC.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 02:31 AM
9

NOBODY EXPECTS A DEFENSE OF THE SPANISH INQUISITION!
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:10 AM
-1

I never said it was a kosher system, only that it was far better than what it replaced.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:03 AM
9

Spanish Inquisition sigh These guys get such a bad rap. Prior to the Inquisition, heresy and witchcraft were tried by local lords and magistrates, same as any other, but with witchcraft evidence being...ephemeral, and heresy evidence being dependent on how the local clergy interpreted the text, it was too easy to abuse and any accusation quickly turned into an execution. The Vatican declared that these were spiritual crimes against God and not man and were thus solely in the jurisdiction of the …
/r/MensRights31/08/17 04:20 AM
7

Ever notice how when there's a million people at a gathering for something the news doesn't like, they find the five people there with Nazi or KKK imagery and wallpaper the news coverage with those five guys and nobody else?
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:44 AM
11

feminist Some kind of SJW. They announced one day that they removed the card 'a passable transvestite' from all future copies because it was offensive, to which most people said something like 'and the rest of the game isn't?'
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:22 AM
2

You think maybe the inherent biological differences between men and women had something to do with it? Of course not. Gender dimorphism is a social construct. Women would be just as strong as men if society encouraged them to work out as much.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:35 AM
3

Cut production of the C-130 (a plane we have too many of, but that is made in an influential congressional district) and end the F-35 program (an over-engineered monstrosity that sucks at everything and nobody wants), and that would cover it by a couple orders of magnitude. It's all politics, and suicidal veterans don't cost anybody votes.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:26 AM
3

Kinda. It's that any time an ideologue makes a character judgement against somebody they're debating, that character judgement is typically true of themselves.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 01:07 PM
3

Gr8 b8 m8. 8/8
/r/MensRights29/05/17 01:41 AM
10

Switch the genders and it's a Lifetime movie. Sargon's Law in action.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 01:37 AM
4

I'm very fortunate it somehow ended up working out OK. How? Did the kid end up not being yours or something?
/r/MensRights29/05/17 01:31 AM
3

Women are 80% of victims. I would dispute that, but let's run with that for a minute. Women are 80% of victims. It follows that women get 80% of the funding. Well, funding for individual shelters is hard to track, but most stats indicate it's evenly distributed across shelters. According to The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, there are 30 DV shelters in Arkansas, with this one being the first of its kind. Funding for women's shelters just went from 100% to 96.7% statewide, a far cr…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:46 AM
2

Wikipedia (with about a dozen citations on this sentence alone). According to Sunni scriptural Hadith sources, Aisha was six or seven years old when she was married to Muhammad with the marriage not being consummated until she had reached puberty at the age of nine or ten years old Followed not by dissenting opinions, but rather a couple of paragraphs trying to justify it.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:02 AM
2

Unless you are the Mongols.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:47 AM
5

Well he had sex with an 11 year old, prepubescent child so there's that. Nine. He married her when she was 7 and consummated when she was 9.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:30 AM
2

It's remote. In this sense, it's like hiding the kids in NYC (cosmopolitan with enough people to hide in) and Siberia. It makes sense, but I think I put more thought into it than George "They Rhyme" Lucas. Obi-Wan wanted to take one to live with family on their remote planet where he could one day train that child. Said child would need to be a warrior, period. Simple biological reality says it should be the son. Force or no force, double the upper body strength is an advantage in a sword fight.…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:10 AM
3

tl;dr Don't use wisdom as your dump stat. Also, never make a deal with a dragon.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:56 AM
1

"Blah blah a woman's body" is all you're going to get from this argument. It's the same way they justify everything to do with abortion.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 02:25 AM
2

Just a guess used as an example of a specious argument. Not intended to be a statement of verified fact (or at least not one for which I have looked up statistics). Think about it. The three most commonly listed dependent types are homemakers, elderly parents, and children. Children are about 50/50. Women have longer life expectancies than men, so are probably the majority of elderly parents listed as dependents, but we'll give ground and say it's also 50/50. I guarantee the majority of homemake…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:40 AM
7

It's what I've been saying for years. If you whore it up when you're in your early 20s, you lower you marriage market value. You also make a problem for yourself in that men tend to want marriage less and less as they get older. You lower your marriage market value, well, you can expect to get less for what you offer. You can either lower your standards or stay single. You don't deserve a great man to take care of you. You deserve nothing. Take what you can get. Unrestrained pre-marital sex life…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 08:35 AM
3

The majority of people listed as dependent on tax returns are women. This means that no woman ever has to worry about working a job, because female privilege means somebody will take care of her. This is closer to true than what feminists are saying about CEOs and politicians.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 07:33 AM
5

You'll laugh, but this is actually a thing. SJWs have gotten pissed at prenatal care being marketed solely to women because 'trans men can give birth, too.'
/r/MensRights23/05/17 07:30 AM
1

Fatherlessness. I think it is both a cause and result of male disposability, along with many other things. Children who don't have fathers don't see men as valuable, and men who didn't have fathers never learn how to find their place in the world as men. To be clear, a child is fatherless if the father is not an integral part of raising the child (weekend visitation only counts as fatherlessness), preferably living under the same roof as the children and the mother, ideally with the biological p…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 02:44 AM
3

Veterans voted Republican in 2008 and 2012 and Obama is a slimy Chicago politician who cares more about his own popularity than anything else. Is anybody really surprised by this?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:47 AM
5

The exact quote was that 'domestic violence' is just a euphemism for 'wife beating,' followed by some line about how it's not women hitting men, it's men hitting women, which flies in the fact of actual facts and statistics.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:45 AM
1

Las Zetas
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:39 AM
1

Before I click the link or read the comments, I'm going to take a wild guess and say that the reviews look like a reverse bell curve (lots of 1 and 5 stars with few middling reviews). Will edit after seeing (imgur is...unreliable where I am, so it may take a while).
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:36 AM
2

Don't. Keep your head down. Take the grade. Invite your classmates to watch the film separately. No public school teacher who volunteered to teach gender studies is going to be convinced to absorb a dissenting opinion by a student, especially a male student. It's your classmates you're trying to convince. Seriously. Head down. Make an A. Move on. It's not worth it. On the other hand, if you can convince your parents to take on this fight, that might do it, but you have to pretend they're embarra…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:34 AM
8

That's illegal. Get proof and then sue.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:30 AM
2

The problem here that I've seen is that men don't know how to constructively express their emotions because of how many have no father added to the fact that men can't spend time around children without being thought of as pedophiles. No male role models. Nobody to teach them how to turn from a boy into a man. Instead, they're surrounded by women, who, despite their protestations, have no idea how a man is supposed to express his emotions, and will, in fact, often mistake boys showing their emot…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:29 AM
2

It's more like the articles written by many of the same feminists who are arguing that the standard of evidence should be just as high for rape as it is in any other criminal case, but instead write the article in the form "Call to prioritize rapists' rights over women's safety." It's dishonest in that it assumes all allegations are true.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:15 AM
3

The lie isn't that love can last forever, but rather that love is a feeling that you should feel at all times. 'True love' is showing love to a person even when you don't like them. True love isn't the Hallmark card picture of staring doe eyed into your lover's eyes, feeling full of good feelings and affection. It's that picture of the cranky old couple sitting on a bench in the rain with their backs to each other and scowls on their faces, but the husband is still holding an umbrella over the w…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:10 AM
12

My choice, my responsibility needs to be tattooed on the inside of everybody's eyelids, because it's not just abortion. I often see people arguing on the one hand that it's nobody's business but theirs if their BMI shoots north of 40, but on the other hand it is most certainly the government's job not only to provide them with free health care, but to upgrade hospital equipment to deal with their girth. Your choice becomes my business as soon as I'm expected to pay for it.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:08 AM
9

People have been saying for years that the ease with which mothers can cut fathers out of a child's life is at the root of many societal ills. Assuming it doesn't just get buried, watch feminists frame this as men's fault.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:48 AM
8

One of the big arguments in favor of women's suffrage was that women jurors would be more likely to convict women to lengthy prison sentences or execution. So much for that idea.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:26 AM
2

I'd take the plastic off and throw it on the ground outside with 'piss off' written over the big sign in red ink.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:19 AM
3

They have to have probable cause to arrest you. They get 48-72 hours to actually charge you with a crime, but as soon as you're under arrest, your sixth amendment right to an attorney kicks in, and your 5th amendment right against self-incrimination is always in effect (as well any privilege you might have, like spousal or doctor/patient). Said right to an attorney is the key to getting released ASAP. The lawyer will invoke your 6th amendment right to know the charges against you as well as any …
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:16 AM
3

It's a motte and bailey strategy. The motte is the very reasonable position that people claiming to be rape victims should be comforted and sheltered while the investigation is underway. The bailey is that the person they accuse should be automatically convicted without trial.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 11:59 PM
1

That's why I said to name the parents, too. Whether it's feasible or not, the point stands that there needs to be a penalty for false accusation before we see it drop off.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 11:53 PM
1

Yeah, as sad as it is, what's more likely to sway public opinion is, say, a man who calls the cops because she keeps trying to stab him or brain him with a frying pan, only for him to be arrested and her to abuse the children while he's in jail. Trotting out (literally) bloody children in an emergency room for injuries inflicted by the mother while the father was in prison for trying to defend them would do way more than any "x% of domestic violence victims are men" studies. That comes after peo…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:53 AM
4

I am generally against pubic photography, at least in public. Sorry, couldn't help myself. The point is well taken, though. Making sending somebody a text message a hate crime? Even worse, the way the law appears to be worded, taking a picture of a tree in a public park could be a hate crime if a woman is also in the frame.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:48 AM
2

Of course rape by envelopment is still rape. Tell that to the FBI. Their rape statistics still define rape as requiring penetration, which is where the "93% of rape victims are women" statistic comes from (most of the other 7% are in prison).
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:45 AM
8

Right off the bat, this article's sources are suspect. She links to a study on an Idaho domestic violence government site to prove that only 2%-10% of rape allegations are false. This study was published by a group called "Violence Against Women," not exactly an unbiased source of information about incidence of false accusation (no matter their intentions, they will get more donations the more people believe that women have it way worse than men). On page 2, we have this gem: The determination t…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:30 AM
3

Nothing new under the sun. This is just the Dan Rather story all over again, only with rape culture derangement syndrome instead of Bush derangement syndrome.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 11:54 PM
2

Obligatory "We're on a mission from God."
/r/MensRights16/05/17 11:51 PM
13

Why do these people always sue just the school? This crap isn't going to stop until they start suing the accusers. The girl and her parents should be named in the lawsuit. If the school loses money (without a drop in enrollment, a la Mizzou), they can just run to the government and say 'muh education spending,' and all the people who made it possible get to keep their jobs and authority. Go after the accusers for defamation. This guy was arrested, so they really need to try to press charges for …
/r/MensRights16/05/17 11:48 PM
2

That percentage is the number of rape accusations that lead to a criminal conviction or guilty plea of filing a false police report or similar.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:00 AM
3

It's going to be hard to prove anything criminal, and here's why (btw, I am an amateur, but I have several lawyer friends and relatives): What they've done: They've accused students of wrongdoing. This is defamation, which is a civil offense. They've also kicked the students out of school without cause, thus violating a contract, which is also a civil offense. The only way they can be held on criminal grounds is if they did additional acts, such as detaining the student (unlawful detention, kidn…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:49 AM
2

If others want to hear, I'll type it up. Please
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:27 AM
1

Notre Dame is a well known and prestigious private school. I'm guessing it's all rich kids and scholarships.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:27 AM
1

It should be costly and expensive to try an innocent person. Maybe that will make them more likely to examine the veracity of DV charges before hauling somebody before a court. The criminal nature also means that the already overworked public defender offices have to provide attorneys the defendants, who now have to be trained in family court as well as criminal court. Criminal trial takes so much hooplah because it's supposed to be taken seriously, which it's not if the trial is a quickie with …
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:24 AM
54

What exactly is wrong with that? Psychologically, it's abnormal behavior that shows interest outside what is acceptable in social circles. It's also bottlenecking. Think about it this way. If you meet and you think you're hitting it off, you can ask for her phone number. Maybe she gives it to you. Maybe she doesn't. Either way, you have passed control of the conversation off to her. Whether she wants to talk to you again or not is now her decision. Waiting outside her place of work leaves her wi…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 06:37 AM
6

I thought Canada was down to zero after that one guy's closed down from lack of funding and he committed suicide. If they're up to two, that's at least an improvement.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 06:29 AM
11

How does?.. but...? How are these two re-...? Does it correct 'husband' to 'metaphor?'
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:03 AM
8

You want to know what happened? Do a Google image search for 'don't need no man' or something similar, then a regular Google search, where the most forgiving thing written by somebody other than an MRA, red piller, or similar is "We don't need men, but we want them." Now Google the welfare payments and benefits for single moms. Now Google the percentage of times a parents seek vs. are awarded primary custody sorted by gender. Now go look at a bunch of old fiction about growing up and take note o…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 03:41 AM
2

Not gonna edit it out though cause I never do that. Based
/r/MensRights15/05/17 03:05 AM
2

This is a standard motte and bailey debate strategy. In the Middle Ages, lower level lords would sometimes own a plot of desirable land that could be farmed for profit, but the terrain made it too difficult and expensive to properly defend. That being the case, he would build a simple keep on top of earthworks (motte) and then some very basic, easy to build defenses around the rest of the land (bailey). When an attacker came along who was too strong to effectively defend the bailey against, the …
/r/MensRights15/05/17 02:42 AM
2

gun sword liberal arts college Liberal arts colleges are so terrified of guns you'd think the things were famous for escaping gun safes and beating their wives. Pretty sure gun vs. sword was the relevant information, though I'm sure the male/female difference contributed and am open to the possibility that the black/white difference did, too.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 02:07 AM
7

Even then, their basic argument is that they could make men less miserable if men would just act more like women.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 06:10 AM
4

The rate of offending... showed relative stability among the female population... For males, however, the rate of offending has continued to decline So when you punish one group of people for offenses, those offenses go down, but when you don't punish a group, they don't go down? Shocking!
/r/MensRights14/05/17 05:49 AM
1

People doing FGM for religious reasons legitimately believe they are preventing eternal suffering through actions that are temporarily harmful.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:58 PM
4

It's touchy. As somebody who was cut and doesn't feel any particular anxiety over it, I think backing down from emotionally charged terms and hyperbole (such as comparing it to pulling all teeth to eliminate cavities) can, at times, be effective in explaining it. Usually, I win people over by saying that, no matter what you think about the foreskin, I try not to make it a habit to remove a body part I don't think there's a use for, especially not without permission from the owner. An example I u…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:34 PM
4

Friendly reminder that Boko Haram was burning underage boys alive for years before they got international attention for kidnapping girls to sell as sex slaves. I remember reading the initial news reports about Boko Haram being against the education of women and kidnapping girls from schools and thinking it was horrific. It wasn't until later that I found out Boko Haram is against all Western Education, Boko being a local word for fake, usually used to refer to Western Education, and Haram being …
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:07 AM
2

Doesn't even come up. Here's the full quote: Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children. She is literally saying that when a man bleeds out in no man's land, crying for his mother w…
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:01 AM
3

Director: Eli Roth There's your problem, right there. The only things he seems to like are torture and sex, and it sounds like he's gotten worse since Hostel, which was half a porn movie followed by half a snuff film.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 05:46 AM
1

In Christian circles, it's not uncommon for people of both genders to tell women to dress modestly in order to keep from 'provoking men to sin.' This is reasonable, as lusting after a woman is sinful, and seeing a woman in revealing clothing directly results in lust. Men are very visual and turned on quite quickly. Spotting a gorgeous woman in a lingerie is typically enough to cause an erection and force him to choose between fighting or embracing the fantasies that pop into his head of various …
/r/MensRights25/04/17 05:40 AM
1

Relevant
/r/MensRights25/04/17 04:50 AM
4

I did notice that, but it got lost in the glamour portrayal and the 'Feel sorry for them' headline instead of something more appropriate, like '(Ladies,) Don't let this happen to you.'
/r/MensRights24/04/17 07:27 AM
7

It's this crap right here that's going to push the pendulum right back to the 1950s. When the official Democrat party line is "LOL white males are stupid and can't be oppressed because power + prejudice," and anybody attempting to change that is labeled as a racistsexistbigothomphobereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!, it's only a matter of time before there's pushback, and if you shut down all the reasonable dissent, only unreasonable dissent is left. I'm seeing blatant white supremacy for the firs…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:59 AM
4

Looking through these victim stories is just unreal. No habeas corpus. No right to a speedy trial. No right to confront witnesses. I think one summed it up best by saying it was a totalitarian state without anyone thinking it was a totalitarian state. Especially bad was when the BBC and the police covered up the prolific pedophilia of Jimmy Savile and then tried to 'make up for it' by throwing every accused pedophile to the wolves, evidence or no. That is fractally sick right there.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:53 AM
5

strong negative connotations. Southern here, and that doesn't even begin to describe it. When my parents were growing up in the pre-Civil Rights era south, black people walking around town, minding their own business, wasn't enough to turn heads. A car with Illinois plates meant Chicago based carpetbaggers, and everybody locked up and shuttered their windows until they left.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:32 AM
2

The minimum number is 2% This is the number of rape accusations that result in a guilty plea or verdict of 'filing a false police report' against the accuser. There are enough well known and obviously false accusations that never got prosecuted to know that the actual statistic is higher than that.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:19 AM
17

They present no alternative. Either all of men's problems are caused by patriarchy and toxic masculinity or you're just blind to your own privilege. Kiss the ring or be declared an enemy. Those are the only choices.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:30 AM
2

Healthy attitude to have. Same attitude here. I told my fiance that I was circumcised, that I didn't want any of our children to be circumcised, and that I'm not bitter at my parents for it, all of which is true. I don't remember the trauma. My parents did what they did out of ignorance. It's not something I can really correct. That being the case, I decided to learn what I could and let it go.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:10 AM
15

One does not have to be hurt to be angry at how awful some people are being treated and how flippant others are being towards those doing the hurting. I'm the happy product of a stable marriage who is engaged to somebody who understands everything I've listed above and is also the happy product of a stable marriage, and the fact that I'm so thankful for both when it was the norm just a few decades ago sickens me, especially when I see how much damage is done to people I know by these awful attit…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:01 AM
21

This is freaking sick. Marriage is a commitment, a lifelong commitment, not just some emotional fling. It's meant to encourage stable families, and when a marriage breaks apart, it hurts the children more than anyone else. So here we have these pictures of smiling, happy women dressed really nice for their photos so they can talk about how they ruined up a marriage because of fee-fees. They weren't neglected or abused. They just wanted some emotions they felt entitled to. Rant incoming: The firs…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 01:52 AM
3

Think that all you want. It's a pattern. Every time this comes up, it goes into a call for, at best, a bunch of money to be thrown at women only STEM scholarships. Usually it goes down the road of trying to figure out how to change the 'culture' of STEM fields to make them less 'misogynistic.'
/r/MensRights23/04/17 11:44 PM
5

If you see this kind of thing come up often enough, you start to notice that any time somebody points out that a majority of something perceived as good is men, this is a problem caused by patriarchy that must be solved. is it really a bad thing to encourage more to do so? Yes. If somebody doesn't want to do STEM, they need to stay away from STEM. They are very difficult fields that are very boring for those who don't enjoy them.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 04:56 PM
2

I'm going to say this one more time, and if you keep talking as if this isn't something I said, I'm just going to assume you're a troll and buzz off. Evidence does not have to be strong enough to support a conviction, an arrest, or even a search warrant for it to count as evidence.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:56 AM
1

If mere accusation was enough Enough for what? A conviction? Again, you seem to think that by 'evidence,' I mean 'damning evidence' or 'evidence fully supporting a conviction' or 'conclusive evidence,' which I have never once indicated. I doubt you'd argue that DNA samples aren't evidence, but they're not enough, either, as they can only prove the presence of a person's cells in a location. Fingerprints are evidence, but again, not enough for a conviction. Saying an accusation doesn't count as e…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:11 AM
3

Marriage was originally intended as a societal benefit for men everyone and the tribes that didnt practice marriage would get conquered by the ones that did. The idea that it only benefited men by default is idiotic. It was balanced one way or another depending on society, but at its base, a man gets access to the rarer female means of reproduction and a way to carry on his family line and provide for himself in old age (children used to be everyone's retirement plan). Women got access to both r…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 06:49 AM
5

The right to vote is part of the basic human rights. Ah, the most hazardous untruth taught in the 20th century west. Voting hasn't been universal among non-felon citizens at any time in human history prior to the 20th century, but it is now claimed as a right. Is it a coincidence that countries which hold that people who pay no taxes and fight no wars should have equal say in how taxes are spent and wars are fought are also the countries with the most prolific militaries and highest proportion o…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 06:44 AM
1

You seem to be conflating 'evidence' and 'conclusive evidence.' A person claiming that something happened is eyewitness evidence. The point of the justice system is that a single piece of evidence cannot be the sole basis for conviction if it is not corroborated. 'Accusation' is just another term for 'eyewitness account of a crime,' which, in a legal sense, is evidence.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 06:34 AM
1

Wapo's getting there with their constant smear campaigns against YouTube and its content creators.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:20 AM
2

Ah, the US founding documents, barriers to modern progressives wanting to impose their worldview on everyone. At least one country has a drag chute on the path to insanity. The relevant passage: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusat…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:06 AM
6

It happens. Poe's law and all.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:59 AM
1

Accusations are evidence. You can argue that it's not very good evidence, but it is still considered evidence in a legal sense.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:57 AM
2

If the patriarchy isn't powerful enough to let us keep these signs up, then it isn't powerful enough to keep them from getting a real job.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:49 AM
8

such as? genuinely curious. The oft-repeated line that women are being kept out of STEM by...something. It keeps changing. The simpler explanation is that they're not interested in STEM, but this brings in the idea that they are socially conditioned by...something...to not want to get a STEM degree.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:44 AM
16

BOYCOTT HULU in 3...2...1...
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:40 AM
2

http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/toys/dailymail/
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:32 AM
1

In Soviet Russia, 20th century bends you...over the table...no lube...
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:30 AM
4

The chick who got called out by Gawker for making a tasteless AIDS joke to her small circle of Twitter followers is still trying to keep her head down to make herself generally employable without an assumed name. That was years ago.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:15 AM
5

Why is it that every time a post like this comes up it gets taken as if someone wants to "take something away" from women? Projection. Whenever a men's center pops up, feminists try their darndest to take it away.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:11 AM
4

Too bad none of this same logic is ever applied to women's sports teams, which is why my college had to cut all but the most high profile men's teams and fund women's teams to the gills just to avoid Title IX violations. I mean, it's definitely paid off in that the women's teams are high performing nationally, but we have no men's teams for swimming and diving or soccer, and this same logic led to the shutdown of almost all men's gymnastics programs around the country, which is why the US now su…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:08 AM
3

So, the whole 'Gamers Are Over' storm caused a massive consumer revolt that is now causing Gawker to hemorrhage from the gills, and her plan is to do exactly that same thing again. Good Luck. FYI, her write/producer is a guy named Jonathan McIntosh. I say this because his tweets are so divorced from reality that going #FullMcIntosh (think 'full retard' from Tropic Thunder) is now synonymous with complete failure to acknowledge reality. Somehow, this wasn't the cap, and it just keeps getting bett…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:53 AM
-2

I think you're taking the extreme version of what I said. It's like if a woman said, "I think if men could experience PMS just once, they'd apologize for not being more understanding," and a feminist said, "So, you're saying women are uncontrollable rage machines when they're on their periods?" No, of course I'm not saying men are 'hormone-crazed slaves to their sex drives.' There is, however, a biological, hormonal struggle that men have. We have instincts where physical appearance and sexualit…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:45 AM
2

I would pay to not talk to a feminist...
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:55 AM
1

Oh, people are, mostly on Twitter, but the thing is that the SJW douches need her to play up the 'victimized woman' angle, and the GamerGaters know that giving her any attention is exactly what she wants, so they mostly ignore her, adding her to the list of people they refer to as 'literally who.'
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:47 AM
6

Actually, I think GamerGaters are winning (and I'm not just saying that because I am one). We can't be shamed because there's no insult they can throw at us worse than what's standard on 4chan (or now 8chan) or Xbox Live. Also, gamers weren't really the 'cool kids' in school, and tend to care less than jack squat about being popular, especially among people who are lying about them, so ostracizing us only makes us mad. Add in the fact that gamers tend to, by nature, think intuitively, be extreme…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:44 AM
5

I think that woman got tyrannosaurus rekt. What's really sad is that I think any (sane, caring) woman who spent more than five minutes in a man's brain, understanding the gaze and the drive, they'd apologize and try to find ways to look good without being next to naked. I know girls have feelings, too, but I get the sense that it's just not the same, because so few of them seem to really 'get it.'
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:27 AM
2

This is the same stupid fallacy I see in politics all the time, which is when people assume that you are either for them or you are somehow against their stated goals. Nobody could possibly think that their methodology is flawed, their leadership is full of crap, on their means of reaching their goals are counterproductive. They want 'equality,' so if you disagree with anything they do, it means you're against equality. It's just like when I run into some smug Democrat who's like, "Oh, you're a …
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:56 AM
1

I saw this a while back and posted it on my sister's Facebook page. She was in law school at the time and said it was a really good lecture. I especially like the part where the cop asks who sped on the way to the class, and when some students raise their hands, you can hear at the back of the room the guy saying something like 'What did I just get through saying?'
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:37 AM
10

A campus pastor I work with includes this little nugget in his speech to incoming freshmen every year: "You know what it takes for you to become a rapist? Getting accused. It doesn't matter if it's true, you're now a rapist. That's why you need to stay away from situations that have even the slightest tinge of looking bad." Over the past 12ish years, the reaction has gone from disbelief to silent nodding.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:35 AM
1

Fortunately, it won't happen without some changes I don't think the American people will go for. The Constitution is very clear about ex post facto laws. In order to be prosecuted for a crime, the action must be illegal at the time you take it. Feminists may say that it was still illegal when they did it, but court rulings have been pretty clear that you can't prosecute somebody if there isn't a way for them to tell if they're committing a crime at the time they commit it.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:35 AM
4

Front line GamerGater here. This is the kind of stuff that I've been waiting to see for years. The radfems, SJWs, and crazy liberals have been accusing all of their ideological opponents of misogyny, racism, homophobia, and every other bad thing in the book for decades. At last, they decided to marginalize a group that, first off, has already been marginalized and is sick of it. Add to that that the group's unifying traits are competitiveness, internet savvy, and enjoyment of mockery, and you ha…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:30 AM
2

As an Arkansan rooted in reality, this does not surprise me.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:24 AM
2

As a Fallout fan, reverse theft of grenades always worries me. This gets me thinking. What would reverse sexism actually be? White knights. They hold that the other gender is better than theirs.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:04 PM
2

I can relate to this. I have poor organizational skills and I'm terrible about being late on assignments. I was frustrated throughout school by these things, and was never really 'taught' anything to fix them. I was pretty much just told to 'do better.' Where I made up for it was stellar test grades. I powered through school by sheer intellect alone.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:24 PM
7

I'm on board with this. She quotes some stuff we know is incorrect only because it'it's so widely believed that she never even thinks to question it. What I really like here, though, is her calling out of BS. Every movement has bad actors, but few people, for example, think Christians are hateful or racist not because nobody claiming Christianity is hateful or racist (Westboro and the KKK, for example), but because Christians call those guys out and say "You don't speak for me!" Feminists, on th…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:59 PM
22

You know what teaches manhood better than any movie? FATHERS being allowed to raise their own freaking children! What's so hard to figure out about a culture that encourages fatherlessness having problems with boys being taught manhood?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 03:25 PM
3

Only thing I have is save and document everything in triplicate. You never know what will be useful, and nothing irritates a judge more than somebody who makes repeated claims that are all easily deflected by a little evidence.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:50 PM
18

I'm torn. On the one hand, I want anybody who believes this to dump me, and I want them to tell my why so I'll know I'm better off. On the other hand...facts...so...wrong. For example, I'm a male gamer and I didn't hear word one about Anita Sarkeesian from the gamer community...because they don't care. She's a non-issue, somebody to be dismissed and ignored for her blatant lack of facts. Public enemy number one in gaming used to be Jack Thompson, but as his disbarment knocked him to irrelevance,…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 08:20 PM
1

Exactly, the Barbary slave trade kept the fertile Mediterranean coast sparsely populated for centuries due to fear of slave raids. It wasn't until the early 19th century when the U.S. (under Jefferson) had enough of their crap that it finally stopped.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 11:43 PM
14

Actually, no, we can't be the descendants of those slaves. The men were castrated and children of the women were killed, which is why there are not large European and African minority groups in the Middle East, despite their slave trade being longer standing and more prolific.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:06 PM
5

Let's go back to freshman logic, shall we. Here is patriarchy as a logically valid statement (note that valid only means that the conclusion follows from the premises, not that it is true). Premise 1: For much of history, men have held all the levers of political power and hold the majority of them today. Premise 2: When given political power, people tend to make laws that are of benefit solely to groups that they are a part of. Conclusion: The legal system is inherently biased against women. Pr…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:42 PM
2

What is this, the 50s? I thought we were past this...and I live less than 2 hours drive from the regional KKK leader!
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:26 PM
3

Libertarian, tending to fall on the right side of the left/right fight. Men's rights caught my attention partially because of how feminism tends toward using the bludgeon of government to get its way.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 12:05 AM
3

Poe's Law: sufficiently well crafted satire is indistinguishable from the real thing.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:51 PM
1

From your name and the fact that you used the definition that I've only seen avowed Marxists use (standard economic definition of capitalism is that the means of production are privately owned and operated, period), I'm going to assume you are a Marxist activist and ask that you kindly stop derailing this comment section. The original discussion was about the assertion that the American left, particularly Democrats, claim to be in favor of women when the opposite is true.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:46 PM
2

I would eliminate all governments, or at least remove from them all power, save for enforcing contracts and prosecute assault and fraud. When all transactions are voluntary, inequality cannot survive. Bigots of all stripes could still legally discriminate, but nobody would be forced to participate, and without government, who's going to force feminism on people who don't want it?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 09:58 PM
4

The drugs used for those treatments are not affected. The 4 drugs affected are the two morning after pills and two IUDs. The only time these are deemed medically necessary is if a woman is raped, in which case any rape crisis center will foot the bill. The standard birth control pills are still covered. The case, itself, hinged on the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which requires that the government have a compelling interest and no feasible alternative before they may impose upon relig…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:34 AM
0

I met several Palestinians and Israelis in college and keep contact with them to this day. The situation is far more complicated than most people know or are willing to admit. The main takeaway I got from all that is that nobody actually gives a crap about the Arab Palestinians, and despite their status as second class citizens in Israel (this is not an exaggeration, but it is also somewhat justified), they're treated better in Israel than they are in any surrounding country. One of these friend…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 12:38 AM
2

Meeting at the VFW is 'unlikely?' I mean, it'seems only a gathering place for men who went to some rock on the other side of the planet to die horribly, many of them against their will, at the whim of their government? Yeah, makes no sense.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:16 PM
3

I fail to see how this imposes religious views on employees. They are free to purchase the 4 (out of 20) contraceptives Hobby Lobby excludes. On the contrary, forcing Hobby Lobby to pay for things they oppose is forcing beliefs on them. The problem is that a person's health isn't seen as their own responsibility.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:11 PM
3

FYI, I put the page on imgur because I don't want to give DK any more traffic.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 11:29 PM
4

So today, based on legal grounds, the Supreme Court ruled that a non-publicly traded company cannot be required, by law, to pay for birth control that goes against the owners' religious beliefs. Daily Kos is there to remind you that all the justices who ruled in favor of it are men, because somehow, requiring everybody (men and women) pay for something is off limits for men to make decisions over because it involves female exclusive products. It's not much better in much of the other media, wher…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 11:28 PM
1

You seem to think I am of the opinion that money should be spent until gender ratios are equal. If so, you are mistaken. I think you misunderstand my assessment of the problem. The girls I know in IT are, on average, far better at their jobs that the guys, on average. It seems to me that only the best of the best ever even try. About 99% of the people I've know who start off a compsci major are men, but that other 1% has a dropout/failout of close to 0. I don't want to theorize why this is, it s…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:04 PM
3

Present the ad without comment, and no sane person would conclude that calling a girl 'pretty' is the problem. Instead, they would see the damage in not encouraging a child's passions. That isn't even a gendered issue (though the ad shows the most common form of the female side of the issue). It's like if an ad showed a montage of a boy being told to give up on this 'computer' nonsense and the conclusion is that this is what happens when you call a boy 'strong.'
/r/MensRights27/06/14 02:55 PM
41

As an IT professional, I do not have a problem with this. A) Google is a private firm, and need not concern itself with being perfectly fair. B) IT is a total sausage fest, and when I talk to girls, many of them would love to do IT, but they think it's too hard (usually, the math is their biggest concern). The few women I do see, though, tend to be among the best workers, so I think there's untapped potential, meaning this is an investment for Google. Edit: fixed some spelling and formatting.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 01:41 PM
62

Asserting your innocence only proves your guilt. Even the Inquisition was never accused of having such a low standard of evidence.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:05 PM
17

Let me reframe this story and see if I have this straight. Mere accusations of making gun motions with a pencil, something for which there was never any punishment when I was a kid, by a bully, no less, are enough to get this kid a two day suspension. But wait, there's more! Apparently, a non-conforming activity that used to be called 'playing' (it was Star Wars when I was a kid and cops and robbers or cowboys and Indians when my dad was a kid...but that's probably racist, too) is so severe that…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:15 PM
1

This pretty much lays out how 80% of the jobs lost were previously held by men, yet protests from feminist groups caused Obama to re-allocate his proposed stimulus in order to secure the female vote. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:00 AM
2

The phrase 'raped of her wings' doesn't even make grammatical sense. Unlike words, such as 'stripped', which have an obvious implied prepositional phrase, the definition of raped doesn't even leave room for a prepositional phrase. It's like 'murdered.' You weren't 'murdered of your wings' or 'murdered from your parents.' You were freaking murdered! That's really all that's there. I also feel the need to do this: http://ofmusingsandwonderings.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/you-keep-using-that-word1.…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:41 PM
2

Women, being historically at a disadvantage, don't have a problem with fighting fair ingrained in their upbringing. They need to be taught how to do effective things. Men, being conditioned to fight fair as a part of values, already know how to cheat. What they need to be taught is that it's ok to cheat in a life or death situation and also the prudence of avoiding an actual fight if you can't win. I don't think I was very clear with all that, but that was my general point.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:04 PM
4

About time! When this thing first hit, it was all about how women were hardest hit by the recession, despite that being the opposite of true, so they got all the aid money. Disclaimer: I don't think the money did anybody a lick of good, anyway. I feel need to mention this to avoid being a hypocrite. It's not that women got 'help,' it's that money, tax money at that, was handed out based on a lie.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:57 PM
1

Wow. I fit that profile, and that got me a rather nice scholarship to my college. Rape culture, right?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:53 PM
1

They're all in denial. They're trying to live up to the societal expectation of the perpetually horny man who wouldn't turn down sex with anybody unless she's ugly or diseased, and sometimes not even then. They don't want to admit that they, too, think sex is something special and would rather wait for that special someone, possibly even saving themselves for marriage. They also deny that there is any form of coercion other than physical or that sex with an adult, especially one in a position of…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:36 PM
3

I could totally see this. 'Morning wood' is something every man knows about, but few actually understand, and I'm sure it sounds like something somebody just made up to women unfamiliar with the phenomenon. I bet your girlfriend noticed the physical state of your member and figured you were awake. It sounds like you believe her and trust her character, so I'm inclined to believe she meant no harm in which case I would encourage forgiveness and an explanation of why that wasn't ok. For those not …
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:30 PM
2

The difference here is that, in war, the men who die are usually shooting back. These guys rounded up all the unarmed, male civilians and executed them. The last time this was standard in warfare was back in the bronze age, where they were trying to kill off any potential resistors to their occupation. That practice died out in much of the world after the fall of the Assyrians (their Babylonian conquerors took all the educated men back to Babylon and spared anybody else who wasn't nobility).
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:16 PM
9

All seriousness aside, this immediately reminded me of when Bobby Hill (King of the Hill) took a women's self defense class and then started running around school kicking everybody in the testes. This particularly issue is a bit touchy, though. Women's self defense classes are meant to teach women, who are, in general, physically weaker than their attackers, how to fight dirty. Nut shots. Eye gouges. Whatever induces the most amount of pain in as little time as possible. They also teach women to…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:59 PM
1

If you have to pay for it, it isn't a right. Once you've paid for it, it's a contractual obligation.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:10 AM
1

There's one guy defending the group. Everybody else flippantly dismisses him and ignores everything he says.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:40 AM
1

It's not hard. I wrote three articles for them in college for a little extra scratch. You might be subjected to editorial censorship, though. Also note that they can and will alter the article a lot if they think it should be different. For example, I try to avoid profanity. One of my articles, as published on Cracked, is laced with gratuitous profanity.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:29 AM
2

This. I love the comedically informative articles about things that will kill you, sci-fi scenarios turned real, or the kinds of crazy stuff behind the cameras on movie sets. Whenever somebody gets an editorial itch and decides to write seriously about a serious issue, they just come off as uninformed, opinionated children. I stopped reading due to their constant, baseless attacks on both Christians and the rich (they had an article called [x] Things Rich People Need to Stop Saying, which basica…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:27 AM
2

One of the justifications for women's suffrage was that it would make women eligible for jury duty. This was important because an all male jury at a trial with a male prosecutor was incredibly unlikely to convict a female murderer, and even less likely to proscribe the death penalty. But, you know, privilege.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:58 PM
2

These are the people I'm looking for. Both those who are in the middle of it and those still dealing with the scars. I will use any means available to me to stop this kind of thing wherever it exists and help the victims heal. It's bad enough that they let this kind of thing go on. It's so much worse that they punish people who try to stop it. It's one of the primary reasons why I think the current government school system needs to be completely dismantled. I don't know how you would replace, bu…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:09 PM
2

Understood. It's a long post, so I thought you were replying to me, but had skimmed and missed that part. No hostility intended. For the record, I did fight back when I thought I could get away with it, and it scared the crap out of people because I did it so rarely.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:53 PM
5

I think the biggest flaw in this is that it only places humanity on the person looking at said M&Ms without considering the other side of it. It's like the old 'you wouldn't buy a car without a test drive' reason for shacking up before marriage. It's great if you're the driver. It sucks if you're the car. I would also like to point out that the exact same analogy is actually quite easy to turn around when it comes to women and relationships. It's pretty rare for a man to rape a woman and even ra…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 12:33 PM
2

Perhaps you missed the part in there where I did fight back, but at the tender age of 12, had it explained to me that fighting back would ruin my academic career. There's also the fact that I was a runt and was simply incapable of fighting back effectively. Oh believe me, I'm fully in favor of fighting back and being done with it, but in my case, the only thing that would have come from that is me and the bully getting suspended, damaging my academic credentials and giving the bully a three day …
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:42 AM
9

Rape culture, as it has been expressed to me, is complete and total BS. As an engineer, I feel the need to lay it out briefly and scientifically: Thesis: Western culture subtly teaches that rape is ok, or at least isn't really rape. Evidence for: Some women get raped and nobody goes to jail. Evidence against: Even murderers consider themselves better than rapists. Rapists are the most common targets of vigilante justice, both in real life and in fiction (name me one superhero movie where the her…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:21 AM
7

No, higher education isn't a right. It is a privilege. However, slander is a crime, and even if it wasn't, you lose the right to declare your independence from due process the second you ensure that you are on the tax dollar gravy train and can't go out of business. It's not enough that they set up their femtopia at the expense of innocent men. They have to use the threat of violence to force those exact same men to pay for it.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:36 AM
0

Please enlighten me as to how somebody can express the inherent legal disadvantage a man has in a marriage (no fault divorce coupled with favoritism in terms of alimony, custody, child support, etc.) without 'including stereotypes.' I don't see anywhere in that statement where this guy is accusing women of anything, only criticizing a law that allows them to do so.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:33 PM
5

This brought up some...painful memories that I try to avoid. All I have to say is confront it and don't suppress it. I got shrugged off as a 'victim' of 'bullying,' and bullying is just a part of growing up, right? Confront it and don't let anybody tell you it's not a big deal. Before anybody starts trying to give advice, I'm fine. It was over 15 years ago, and I have friends I can confide in.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:26 PM
3

Same here. I kinda like it. Not gonna lie. To be fair, I haven't been indoctrinated to think that women who catcall me are likely to follow me to a dark alley and force themselves on me. I typically don't blame the women half so much as the feminists who indoctrinated them on this stuff. On a side note, this being Buzzfeed, the 'article,' if it can even be called that, is just a bunch of stock photos (at least they're not animated) accompanied by nothing of substance. At least this one was full …
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:09 PM
2

I, personally, am of the opinion that the whole thing is childish. I'm very hesitant to get behind the banning of words, for any reason. This is mostly because I really don't see how anybody is supposed to learn how to handle real problems when they get distraught over being called names. What bugs me about this, though, is that feminists speak out against gender roles and norms all the time, until it's convenient to invoke a gender norm (that of the stoic male) to silence criticism.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:55 PM
1

I would probably start off by pointing out that the vast majority of men who have fought in war held relatively little political power. Two-thirds of all American soldiers who fought in World War 2 were conscripts, meaning they had to be forced at the point of a gun. Most of these were under the then-current voting age of 21. A group of generals, an emperor, and a pair of petty dictators decided to conquer the world, and that's not something you can lay at the feet of an 18-year-old kid trying t…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:28 PM
19

What drew my attention was this: "The baby is the innocent one, judges say. One court put it this way: If the sex was voluntary, then the parenthood is also." If this was uttered verbatim as a pro-life argument, whoever said it would be crucified by the media.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:06 AM
9

It's all based on the assumption that when a family breaks up that either the dad was too much of a scumbag to stick around or he was too much of a scumbag for the mom to stay with him. It's heads I win, tails you lose.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:02 PM
2

I decided to do a quick compare and contrast between their articles on misogyny and misandry (WTF?! Chrome's flagging misandry as misspelled). The article on misogyny refers to the 'thing' misogyny, while the article on misandry is about the word. Compare the first sentences: Misogyny is the hatred of women, or the belief that women are inferior to men. Misandry is a term referring to hatred or contempt for men.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 12:53 AM
1

Not only that, but the justification for executing men who dodged conscription during WWI is that conscription was the price men paid to be allowed to vote. Suffragettes brought up a possible wartime services function for women with suggestions of forcing them to make equipment, sew uniforms, etc. to earn voting privileges. That discussion disappeared the second the women got the vote.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 12:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter