~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | My fiancé is leaning alt-right in general... advice?Not sure you know what defensive means... You told her she was stonewalling. That's one example of a conclusion you drew. Incorrectly, I will add. | /r/ExRedPill | 09/03/17 07:37 AM |
| 4 | My fiancé is leaning alt-right in general... advice?You're the only person in this thread who drew the conclusions you did based upon the OP. And frankly, I have no idea how you did. OP's comments make it even clearer that your response is way off base. | /r/ExRedPill | 09/03/17 06:30 AM |
| 5 | My fiancé is leaning alt-right in general... advice?Ugh. I'm sorry, I definitely feel you there. I've spent time *there too. The only reason my husband survived our dead bedroom was because the relationship was otherwise (mostly) really good. We're spiritually and politically very aligned, as well as in agreement on how to raise our kids. And the dead bedroom is getting better, and thankfully was never as egregiously disrespectful as yours seems to be. Ultimately it sounds to me like his needs, views and feelings are the only ones he cares about … | /r/ExRedPill | 09/03/17 05:01 AM |
| 5 | My fiancé is leaning alt-right in general... advice?You should read OP's other comments in this thread and then go ahead and walk some of that nonsense back, or maybe all of it. In a romantic relationship, it's usually not the beliefs themselves that matter as much (except in very extreme cases), but how those beliefs lead a person to treat their partner and others. | /r/ExRedPill | 09/03/17 04:50 AM |
| 4 | My fiancé is leaning alt-right in general... advice?Hey, I just wanted to say, amidst these crazy long responses from someone who seems to want you to question your knowledge of your fiance and your relationship, and seems to think they know more about it all than you do: I hear what you are saying and I think your concerns about the relationship are extremely valid. Your gut definitely needs to be listened to in all this. And it seems like your gut is reporting major red flags. Political differences in a relationship can matter a lot or very lit… | /r/ExRedPill | 09/03/17 04:38 AM |
| 2 | People are awful(Mostly rambling)You're in high school. You've barely lived. | /r/ExRedPill | 09/03/17 04:27 AM |
| 1 | Hate Mongering from r/AgainstMensRightsJust clarifying your policies. Good to know gendered violence, torture, sexual harassment and threats are A-OK around here! Paul Elam would be proud :D Edit: although you don't even follow your own policies, I notice. Doxxing also seems to be A-OK round these parts. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/14 12:37 AM |
| 0 | Hate Mongering from r/AgainstMensRightsHow about sexually harassing and threatening other users? That cool with you guys? P.S. I'd call dozens of deleted posts in one thread a "repeat offender," wouldn't you? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/14 11:41 PM |
| 1 | Hate Mongering from r/AgainstMensRightsWorks for me, but let's try this one: http://imgur.com/ufjMrhf | /r/MensRights | 27/03/14 11:26 PM |
| 2 | Hate Mongering from r/AgainstMensRightsStill not gonna ban him though, eh? I guess if the "cut off her clitoris" thing didn't do it, nothing will: http://manboobz.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/g4bfsdt.jpg Curious. What does get one banned from r/mensrights, if not outright advocating gendered violence and torture? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/14 11:15 PM |
| 0 | Norwegian troops get unisex dorms-(the women so far report a cut in sexual harassment.)Hold up a minute, let's revisit: And you're the one who believes that men are so embroiled in toxic masculinity that they are brought up to have so little empathy toward women that rape is an integral part of the current masculine identity. It's breathtaking that you would actually dare to suggest, without knowing me at all, that this is what I believe - just because I identify as a feminist. It shows a complete misunderstanding of mainstream feminism, to be honest. Rape and sexual assault are e… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 06:35 PM |
| 2 | Norwegian troops get unisex dorms-(the women so far report a cut in sexual harassment.)I'm not your buddy, actually! It's hilarious to ME that you think fictional narratives are somehow not reflective of our culture's collective values. But there are, of course, a ton of real life examples that disprove your "theory." Interesting how you think you know what I - and feminists - believe. Also interesting how wrong you are about all of it. But it's not a huge surprise given that the men's rights moment is based on one giant, imaginary strawfeminist. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 04:27 PM |
| 3 | Norwegian troops get unisex dorms-(the women so far report a cut in sexual harassment.)Wow. You really like to edit every single one of your extremely short comments after the fact, don't you? My theory, as a war veteran, is that the ultimate reason why women think they have it so bad is because they've got no idea how men have it and very little capacity to empathize. Do you agree, or disagree, with this extremely straightforward statement? Would you protest at this statement it if the genders were reversed? Do you believe that women inherently possess less empathy than men? Do I… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 06:45 AM |
| 0 | Norwegian troops get unisex dorms-(the women so far report a cut in sexual harassment.)With men, given that they're constantly portrayed as monsters, rapists, and dumb jocks more than anything else unless they're ridiculously good looking? To you I say - and I mean this with 100% sincerity - what? I mean...have you heard of...every protagonist ever? Nope. I'd say women in aggregate--especially in aggregate, actually--legitimately lack the ability to empathize with men as a group, especially compared with the converse. So you do believe women are less capable of empathy than are me… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 06:34 AM |
| 1 | Norwegian troops get unisex dorms-(the women so far report a cut in sexual harassment.)My theory, as a war veteran, is that the ultimate reason why women think they have it so bad is because they've got no idea how men have it and very little capacity to empathize. Do you agree, or disagree, with this extremely straightforward statement? Would you protest at this statement it if the genders were reversed? Do you believe that women inherently possess less empathy than men? You made the whole thing up because you're trying to be cute with me. I'm flattered, honestly, but I'm not int… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 06:20 AM |
| -1 | Norwegian troops get unisex dorms-(the women so far report a cut in sexual harassment.)Ignoring the rest of your dross - the explicit statement at hand was that women have little capacity for empathy. Currently it is upvoted to +17 in your "human rights" subreddit. Do you agree? Or disagree? Will you disavow that statement of behalf on your movement? | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 05:00 AM |
| 1 | Norwegian troops get unisex dorms-(the women so far report a cut in sexual harassment.)Are you disputing the claim that women have little ability to empathize, on behalf of your "human rights movement"? You understand that this is why people (correctly) believe you guys are misogynists, right? | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 04:50 AM |
| -3 | Norwegian troops get unisex dorms-(the women so far report a cut in sexual harassment.)You heard it here from MR: Women have very little capacity to empathize. +17. Human rights movement, anyone? caaaaan you feel the riiiiiights tonight? | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 04:38 AM |
| 1 | Five rights feminism delivered for women, but doesn’t want to share with anyone elseit happens the other way around so much more Does it? According to this study, the difference in reproductive coercion between the two genders is less than two percent: http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf (Page 48) Numerous articles describe the compelling link between reproductive coercion of women and intimate partner violence against women. There is also a huge correlation between young mothers on public assistant and reproductive coercion by men: http://www.theho… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/14 01:19 AM |
| 1 | Near unbelievable lack of self awareness but true to form - Twitter feminists respond to a recent article about false accusations and the mrm by making false accusations about the mrm.feminists are the primary suspects for shooting her dog, aren't they. For you, they clearly are. Because you want them to be. Yet there is no proof and you continue to claim it as fact. ....I have no idea what how wall of text is supposed relate to my comment, or if there is even the slightest bit of credibility to the claims made therein. Not sure why you characterize feminists being doxxed as mere "criticism" while MRAs being doxxed is "harassment." But beyond your intellectual inconsistency, … | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 12:02 AM |
| 1 | Near unbelievable lack of self awareness but true to form - Twitter feminists respond to a recent article about false accusations and the mrm by making false accusations about the mrm.The citations in that Wikipedia article for the claim that "militant feminists" killed Erin Pizzey's dog are from 1999 and 2006. Here is Erin Pizzey stating 10 months ago that she does not know who shot her dog. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 11:42 PM |
| 2 | Majority of feminist gripes explained by a single psychological disorderlol | /r/MensRights | 05/03/14 07:28 AM |
| 0 | CNN leads college rape article with woman who claims to have been raped by boyfriend of three years after breaking up who 'pressured her.'Makes all the sense in the world that an MRA would ridicule compassion, and be upvoted for it. You should all be embarrassed. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/14 02:30 AM |
| 2 | shouldn't this apply to everyone, not just women?So...you want to call obese people "fat fucks" not because of anything they have said or done, but because of what other people say about you/them? That...makes a ton of sense... | /r/MensRights | 13/01/14 12:01 AM |
| 1 | Getting divorced turns men into slavesHe isn't funding two households. That's a ridiculous thing to day. We're talking about $400 a month here. I didn't say "fuck him." But yes, he needs to get a better job. If he can't due to factors he can't control, then he shouldn't have had three kids. I don't call $400/month to support three kids ridiculously unfair. It is a large chunk of his monthly income. But he's the one who had the kids in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 06:12 PM |
| 2 | Getting divorced turns men into slaveshad the original divorce not occurred. But it did occur, and kids cost money, whether their parents are married or not. Child support is a means of knowing that the parent without primary custody is paying their fair share. $400/month is not a lot for 3 kids, as many in this thread have pointed out. OP needs to get a better job. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 03:29 AM |
| 0 | Getting divorced turns men into slavesI would say it was irresponsible for any person, man or woman, to mother or father three kids on a salary barely above the federal poverty line for a single person household. You're making this about men vs. women, and I'm not interested in having that discussion. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 02:46 AM |
| 1 | Getting divorced turns men into slavesI thought according to the usual strawfeminist propaganda FTFY Dude, the guy fathered 3 kids with this woman. He makes a little over 1k a month. You really can't agree with me that it wasn't the most fiscally responsible series of decisions anyone has ever made? r/mensrights: where everything is a woman's fault, always, and when you can't absolutely PROVE that it is you can just make up a reason that feminists are hypocrites in a desperate attempt to change the subject! | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 01:55 AM |
| 6 | Getting divorced turns men into slavesOh right, I forgot, all women are spermjackers and/or men hold no responsibility for birth control, so it's safe to assume that the decision to have not one, not two, but THREE children was completely out of his hands. /s | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 01:32 AM |
| 2 | Getting divorced turns men into slavesMaybe your boyfriend having three kids on a salary of 13,000/year was, in fact, the first mistake? | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 12:05 AM |
| 1 | Should false rape accusers be sued?By Roxanne JonesAnd yet - just because you can't PROVE a rape or sexual assault occurred doesn't 100% guarantee that it DIDN'T occur. Only if it is 100% provable that the accuser was knowingly lying should their name be added to any kind of registry. Otherwise it's still more disincentive for legitimate rape victims to report their rapes. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 05:10 AM |
| 1 | Slam dunk: Jury quickly convicts woman of falsely accusing two men of rapeHave a great evening and great rest of your weekend :) | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 08:00 AM |
| 3 | Slam dunk: Jury quickly convicts woman of falsely accusing two men of rapeThe latter portion of your original comment is a preposterous strawman hypothetical. Feminists wish to reduce rape victim blaming & shaming, but have no wish to throw out due process for any defendant. And my point still stands: that it's pointless to compare the two as you could cherry pick any two examples that would make one seem worse than the other, depending on your agenda - even in your futuristic feminazi dystopia. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 07:31 AM |
| 1 | Slam dunk: Jury quickly convicts woman of falsely accusing two men of rapeNot all rapes result in assault or murder, just as not all false rape accusations end in convictions or prison time :) | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 06:59 AM |
| 0 | Slam dunk: Jury quickly convicts woman of falsely accusing two men of rapeI always wonder about the feminists that say false accusations aren't as bad as rape. Rape vs someone losing maybe decades of their life in prison and probably also raped themselves. The latter portion of your comment was not worth my time or attention. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 01:51 AM |
| -1 | Slam dunk: Jury quickly convicts woman of falsely accusing two men of rapeBut might be a natural consequence or companion of rape, just as being sent to prison, and being raped while there, might be natural consequences of a false rape accusation. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 09:09 AM |
| -1 | Slam dunk: Jury quickly convicts woman of falsely accusing two men of rapeAn actual rape actually happened to someone. False rape accusations lead to convictions an even lower percentage of the time than real rape accusations do, which is already a ridiculously low conviction rate. Therefore, if you MUST compare the two, I'd say that actual rape is by the far worse problem. Could one false rape accusation end up worse than one honest-to-goodness rape? Sure, the poor soul could be thrown in jail for years of his or her life and raped by cellmates, and that would be bot… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/13 03:45 AM |
| 1 | Pictured on CCTV the horrifying moment French mother calmly pushes her baby girl to drown in the sea because she claimed child was 'incompatible' with her love lifeI agree. And it in no way paints this woman in a more favorable light. Similar to Casey Anthony partying after murdering her daughter - killing your child because they were an obstacle to your social/love life is not at all a flattering angle for the woman, much less doing so at the behest of some lame boyfriend. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/13 04:21 PM |
| -1 | Pictured on CCTV the horrifying moment French mother calmly pushes her baby girl to drown in the sea because she claimed child was 'incompatible' with her love lifeIt's am amazing ability you have, you make every single story you encounter fit your pre-determined narrative. I wish I had such a gift :) Oh and I would revisit the definition of the word "justify" if I were you. Twas not the word you were looking for. Can you admit that at least? | /r/MensRights | 02/12/13 04:10 PM |
| -2 | Pictured on CCTV the horrifying moment French mother calmly pushes her baby girl to drown in the sea because she claimed child was 'incompatible' with her love lifeEstablishing a possible partial motive for someone's behavior is very far from justifying it. *edit: I love that you turds downvoted this as if it wasn't a completely valid point. You are completely overstating you claim of discrimination/victimhood as usual, which is why no one takes your joke of a movement seriously. Learn a lesson, Jesus Christ. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/13 03:55 AM |
| -7 | Tumblr is at it again. Men's rights activism is about harassing feminists.The maturity of this comeback is staggering. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/13 11:25 PM |
| -4 | Pictured on CCTV the horrifying moment French mother calmly pushes her baby girl to drown in the sea because she claimed child was 'incompatible' with her love lifeWho in this particular situation is arguing that this mother's actions were justified? | /r/MensRights | 01/12/13 11:06 PM |
| 0 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.You have incorrectly assumed that I am interested in having a conversation with you. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/13 10:18 PM |
| 0 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.What a brilliant, complete and penetrating summary of both reality and feminism. I have treasured your insightful remarks throughout this exchange. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/13 06:41 PM |
| 0 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.LOL. If a group of people as classified by race or gender or sexual orientation is systematically disenfranchised, in favor of another group of people, what would YOU call that? You are welcome to pick whatever term you like - but whatever it is, I'm sure we can agree that it's wrong. EDIT: Wish you had acknowledged your huge misinterpretation of my original point, instead of picking a fight about something else that we will obviously never agree about...but your whole shit is clearly about figh… | /r/MensRights | 01/12/13 08:15 AM |
| 0 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.Huh? Edit: I think you seriously misunderstood what I was trying to say. I was responding to the "you think/feel/act this way, you are a women, therefore I can attack all women (or feminists if I choose, even if you aren't a feminist) for thinking/feeling/acting in the same way" mentality that is rampant in this subreddit. I did not say in any way that all women are ridiculed and attacked. Certainly they have no problem with women who buy into their claims that white men are THE oppressed class. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/13 02:03 AM |
| 0 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.I'm sorry, but what is this in response to exactly? Doesn't make sense as a reply to anything I've said in this thread... | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 07:39 PM |
| -2 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.Upvote for awesomeness! | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 05:20 AM |
| -7 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.I am neither a MRA nor knowledgeable in the thing you call MRA logic. Peeked at your posting history. Eye roll. The people you mock are men, so you mock men. They are men. That is not why I am mocking them. Can we be done now? What's your agenda on this point - or is it just a case of extreme pedantry? Could you answer my question? No. If you don't already understand the feminist perspective on male privilege and the patriarchy, how it operates, and how exactly it oppresses women, I am not going… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 01:23 AM |
| -7 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.Let's go over this nice and slow for ya. I said, re: the MRM: Or the constant claims that women, as opposed to men, are overly emotional, illogical, and even childlike? You said: Yeah, I can't imagine why anyone would think you were illogical or childlike. Note first that "you" can indicate a plural as easily as a singular subject! Now, take a moment to consider the context. Any moment now it should be dawning on you that the natural interpretation of your response was that it directed at all wo… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:57 AM |
| -6 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.Ahh yes, the cold reality of being a woman unlucky enough to exist in the vicinity of an MRA. Any behavior you engage in that might possibly be perceived as negative reflects upon your entire gender, and ESPECIALLY upon feminism! (Regardless of any evidence that said woman is a feminist!) Luckily I've gone from being massively aggravated by the constant, rampant misogyny in this community to flat-out mocking and laughing at you all. You'll be happy to hear that it's been an extremely pleasant tr… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:45 AM |
| -4 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.Gasp. Fat AND a girl?! Those are the worst things to be!! | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:36 AM |
| -8 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.Feminists are the ones claiming that using logic on a woman is "abuse" or "mansplaining" LOL Feminists are the ones talking about how we need to do things because women "feel" unsafe, despite all of the evidence saying that they're the safest demographic. LOL Actually I'll just save some time: LOL to all of it. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:34 AM |
| -3 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.k! | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:34 AM |
| -3 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.I hear complaints of death threats, by the way- I sometimes doubt them though. I've received them myself. I have no idea where you get that. Recent survey of r/mr. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:30 AM |
| -8 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.LOL you guys are the best. Seriously just the best. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:29 AM |
| -7 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.No trap, logic. Hee hee. MRA Logic, you mean - the same logic that tells you that all women can safely be assumed to be feminists, therefore the enemiez. We mock MRAs, not all men or even most men, and not because they are men. Would you like me to continue repeating this, or...? Define group. Do you maybe mean set? White men as a group, set, or class. Whichever term will best satisfy you and allow you to stop deflecting the material point. :) I don't know what this means. Let A be a set of peop… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:27 AM |
| -8 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.So if you dismiss MRAs who have male privilege, you dismiss men. Some men, yes. Not because they are men, but because they are humans who are blind to their own social privilege. Nice try with the trap though! Most MRAs seem to reject the view that the set of all men is a class How about we swap in a different word then, so you don't have to worry about Marxism? Let's try "group." White men, as a group, are not oppressed; many MRAs believe that they are (see this reply to me in this thread). The… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/13 11:48 PM |
| -12 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.LOL | /r/MensRights | 29/11/13 11:48 PM |
| -6 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.I would not say that men are generally "oppressed" That's great, because they aren't! Yet there are frequently posts on the front page of this subreddit making the argument that out of everyone, white dudes have it the hardest. (Oh, woe is us, people expect us to succeed in life more easily than women or minorities...because it actually IS easier for us to succeed!) There are definitely some areas where things could be better. I agree. So do most feminists, I imagine. But where we differ (me as … | /r/MensRights | 29/11/13 11:30 PM |
| -14 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.Right. All individuals can be oppressed. As a class, white males are not oppressed. Please try harder to understand very simple ideas. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/13 11:07 PM |
| -14 | I find it interesting that Feminists claim to want to break down gender roles. Reality says otherwise.AMR Feminazi here just clarifying: Mantearz, manfeelz, beardtears, mangry, mantrum, and testerical aren't used to shame and dismiss MEN, they're specifically used to mock MRAs who refuse to acknowledge their (white) male privilege and actually believe that they are members of an oppressed class. It's not about men being stoic or showing emotion in general - it's about the specific kind of entitled whining that MRAs engage in. Hope this helps! | /r/MensRights | 29/11/13 10:39 PM |
| 1 | How can I circumvent Lulu's detection so that I can see what's been said about me?Just a thought - you could change your gender to female on Facebook, which would probably remove your profile from the app altogether. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/13 06:58 AM |
| 2 | Getting caught cheating is humiliating??Cheating is wrong no matter who does it, man or woman. Yet it's extremely immature and sensationalist to exact public revenge on the alleged cheater, and WRONG no matter who does it, man or woman. For one thing, the alleged cheater will immediately be convicted in the court of public opinion simply on the word of the accuser. (I thought MRAs were against that kind of thing?) For another, I strongly doubt that some vengeful and immature video is going to create a massive cultural shift on the sub… | /r/MensRights | 27/11/13 08:15 PM |
| -3 | Damsel in Distress: Part 3 - Tropes vs Women in Video GamesAnita knows exactly what she's doing. I can't possibly denigrate the high level of her skill at this other than to point out that it is the skill of sociopaths and narcissists, one that I would never want for myself for fear of the cost it would levy on my soul and respectability. LOLOLOL. these PEOPLE. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/13 03:55 AM |
| 1 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menOh, you. :) | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 04:19 PM |
| -1 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menMy bad! Though you do a great impression of one, I have to say. Up to and including posting in /mr :) | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 03:45 AM |
| -5 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menI'm sorry, don't MRAs blame women/feminists for basically everything bad that has ever happened to any man? I must have been confused all those times when y'all did exactly that. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 01:53 AM |
| -1 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menYour sexism is evident in that you assume the accusation is true. And yet I purposefully didn't specify the gender of the perpetrator or victim. Hmm. No, you don't. I'm surprised that you would feel so comfortable dictating to someone else what their personal experience has been. This is all just feminist bullshit that isn't supported by the evidence at all. It's supported by a good deal of evidence, including a study that was done involving 2 identical applicants for a STEM job, but one with a … | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 01:30 AM |
| 0 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menExcept that these qualities cannot be attributed to men these days without a scream of "women can be strong/tough/independent/unemotional too!" Right, because they can be. Creating unbreakable molds for either gender is a bad thing. Some women are stoic; some men are very emotionally expressive. Both are totally okay. So your plan is to stop praising men for anything, and have only negative portrayals of them, and then somehow magically men will be valued by society? Nope! I believe you may be t… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 01:13 AM |
| 1 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menThanks! | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 01:05 AM |
| -1 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menAnd I guess I have to ask you to reread again: And that doesn't mean alpha masculinity in and of itself is a bad thing And it's not a bad thing. But when it's held up as the standard for everyone else - and if you don't meet it, you're inferior somehow - that is a bad thing. Clearly it is crushing to a lot of young men. Yea, by feminist idiots, with no evidence for such a belief. Civility is important, my friend. You have to be an idiot to think that men who shoot up schools are trying to be her… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 01:05 AM |
| -2 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menFirefighters are sometimes praised and respected, but that doesn't extend to any sort of decent treatment or pride in situations other than those where they are explicitly acting as firefighters. I don't understand. Firefighters are frequently praised and very respected, I would argue...but why should they get preferential treatment in their everyday lives? I highly doubt those firefighters actions where they risked their lives would help them at all if they were accused of domestic violence, fo… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 12:57 AM |
| 4 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menSo yes, if they aren't heroes and warriors fighting an obviously evil enemy they are rejected. Or just strong, tough, independent, unemotional, so on and so forth. Anything not traditionally masculine in a man is frowned upon by society at large. I think this is truly unfortunate. Yet you blame the image of masculinity instead of societies fucked up attitude towards men. These two things are one and the same. The image of masculinity is not the same thing as masculinity. It's our culture's portr… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 12:46 AM |
| 0 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menHow does that relate to my comment? | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 11:58 PM |
| 5 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menI don't believe you actually read what I said. Here again: When you ask why the tendency exists for men to schoot up malls/schools/theaters and not women, you are asking what impact this extreme pressure to be a hero masculine type can have on the more reserved, "beta" types in our culture. Sometimes it can be really terrible. And that doesn't mean alpha masculinity in and of itself is a bad thing, it only suggests that the way our culture holds it up and prizes it above any other state of being… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 11:56 PM |
| -3 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menI didn't say that masculinity was to blame; you didn't read carefully enough. See again what I wrote: When you ask why the tendency exists for men to schoot up malls/schools/theaters and not women, you are asking what impact this extreme pressure to be a hero masculine type can have on the more reserved, "beta" types in our culture. Sometimes it can be really terrible. And that doesn't mean alpha masculinity in and of itself is a bad thing, it only suggests that the way our culture holds it up a… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 11:48 PM |
| -1 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menI believe that firefighters are extremely respected and very commonly heralded as heroes within their community. See: the mania over firefighters in the aftermath of 9/11. It's certainly a job that carries with it a positive connotation of masculinity, if the firefighter is male, untouched by any feminist influence. Do you not agree? | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 11:44 PM |
| 4 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menThe very first sentence in the very first article I found about the firefighters: The 19 firefighters killed Sunday in an Arizona wildfire were young, brave family men. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 10:35 PM |
| -8 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menAs I said to spagma: Look at basically any action movie poster and you see how society views alpha masculinity: as the ideal, as the superior way to be, as the leadership role, etc etc etc. When you ask why the tendency exists for men to schoot up malls/schools/theaters and not women, you are asking what impact this extreme pressure to be a hero masculine type can have on the more reserved, "beta" types in our culture. Sometimes it can be really terrible. And that doesn't mean alpha masculinity … | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 10:34 PM |
| 12 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were menits perfectly fine for them to blame men, all men and capitalize on the situation How are all men being blamed? How is this even remotely true? Asking the question, "Why does it tend to be men and men only who are responsible for mass shootings?" is valuable and necessary, and is in fact an effort at healing this singular toxicity in our society, not demonizing men in general. Look at basically any action movie poster and you see how society views alpha masculinity: as the ideal, as the superior… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 10:29 PM |
| -4 | Why it's important to underscore the fact that all 19 firefighters killed in an Arizona wildfire were mennature has a say in who wants to be a fireman. If you really believe this, then doesn't nature have a say in who dies in fires? And shouldn't nature - not feminism - be the villain in this case? | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 10:21 PM |
| 1 | Feminist says 5 day work week is sexist: "many have argued for the four-day workweek, or flexible hours in general, as a way to retain talented female workers who might otherwise quit altogether in order to have children."Ooooookay. I will back away slowly from the mangry, possibly homophobic dude talking about strap ons for no reason. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/13 05:14 PM |
| 0 | Feminist says 5 day work week is sexist: "many have argued for the four-day workweek, or flexible hours in general, as a way to retain talented female workers who might otherwise quit altogether in order to have children."Your idea of discussing issues seems to boil down to calling people names, half of which apparently make no sense. As I said, I'll leave you to it. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/13 05:13 PM |
| -1 | Feminist says 5 day work week is sexist: "many have argued for the four-day workweek, or flexible hours in general, as a way to retain talented female workers who might otherwise quit altogether in order to have children."I get that you're angry. I think you're misunderstanding pretty much all of that, though. It's obviously better if children have loving, engaged fathers, or a 2nd parent around of any gender. The "bitch" you spoke of wrote a book explaining that single mothers are capable of raising well adjusted boys - I don't believe she ever claims that it's easier or better without a father in the picture. Her argument is more in response to the constant demonization of single moms in our culture. the femini… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/13 04:53 PM |
| 0 | Feminists In EU Parliament Want Law Forcing Women To Work On Fishing Boats !<3 | /r/MensRights | 26/06/13 06:48 AM |
| 0 | Feminists In EU Parliament Want Law Forcing Women To Work On Fishing Boats !Your sources mean nothing Says the silly MRA who couldn't provide one source of his own. The LOLZ don't end with you, do they? congrats. I almost want to upvote you out of sheer delight at your unrepentant awfulness. Thanks for making me giggle, anyway :) | /r/MensRights | 26/06/13 04:50 AM |
| 4 | Feminist says 5 day work week is sexist: "many have argued for the four-day workweek, or flexible hours in general, as a way to retain talented female workers who might otherwise quit altogether in order to have children."I can google her book all day, but will have no way of knowing what exactly you find demonic about it. However, I find that less interesting than the fact that you demonize your enemies by literally calling them "demons." Don't you ever wonder if that level of melodrama is good for you or for your movement? | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 11:13 PM |
| 5 | Feminist says 5 day work week is sexist: "many have argued for the four-day workweek, or flexible hours in general, as a way to retain talented female workers who might otherwise quit altogether in order to have children."And what did she do to achieve spawn of satan status, exactly? | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 10:39 PM |
| 0 | Feminists In EU Parliament Want Law Forcing Women To Work On Fishing Boats !Which did not write itself. Imagine, an MRA using sensationalism and hyperbole to hypocritically complain about women taking dangerous jobs typically worked by men! Wonder what happened to that whole "male disposability" thing. Oh well! | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 07:45 PM |
| 0 | Feminists In EU Parliament Want Law Forcing Women To Work On Fishing Boats !their research methodology means I don't have to do anything Care to elaborate? No? Didn't think so. Canadian national archives for crime reports http://imgur.com/QX1j16L | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 07:03 PM |
| 0 | Feminists In EU Parliament Want Law Forcing Women To Work On Fishing Boats !Also, did any of you actually watch the video? Nowhere does she even say that the women have to work on the boats. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 03:28 AM |
| 2 | Feminists In EU Parliament Want Law Forcing Women To Work On Fishing Boats !Have you seen the news lately? LOLOLOL That's your SOURCE? "Have you seen the news lately?" I mean there has just GOT to be some self-awareness there, right? Or do you really have so little shame? Unreliable source which is known to openly manipulate numbers. The LOLs just keep coming. 96%, dude. Either you can refute it or you can't. Why on earth would they manipulate numbers? What anti-male conspiracy is at work here? Must be convenient, to be able to dismiss any source that utterly destroys y… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 03:06 AM |
| 1 | Feminists In EU Parliament Want Law Forcing Women To Work On Fishing Boats !You forgot the sarcasm tag. No, you did. I called my comment and yours out for what they were: sexist and insulting. statistics proving that women molest children more often than men aside Would love to see them! it's just a simple biological fact Ah, those classic watchwords of the sexist asshole. So, because of the biological fact that most men are stronger than most women, no woman could ever be strong enough to work on a fishing boat? Hooray for MRA Logic™! Edit to add, from Sexual Assault o… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/13 05:05 PM |
| 2 | Feminists In EU Parliament Want Law Forcing Women To Work On Fishing Boats !And men working in childcare positions could get children molested. As long as we're making broad, sexist, insulting assumptions. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/13 08:16 PM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.You were advocating that fathers be "equal" under the law in terms of being able to drop their infants at a Safe Haven despite any paternity claims, or at least saying that it was unjust that the mother could relinquish responsibility after birth, but not the father. Correct? I layed out what that "right" would mean in practical terms. This, apparently, is criminal debate misconduct to you. Just FYI, what Save Haven really means in practical terms is that less infants get abandoned in dumpsters.… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/13 12:30 AM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.This part right here is something I did not say. Nor did I ever claim that you said it. I outlined the "rights" for fathers that you were advocating in terms of what they would mean on a practical level. No need to get all bent out of shape at a nonexistent offense. Be it a mother, or a father, for either parent to choose to abandon both authority over and responsibility for a child is not "classy". But mothers have that non-classy option. Fathers should too. Fathers do have that option in all e… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/13 07:41 PM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Well, there's a group of men I'm concerned about, and you're not only being flippitant about the concerns, you're re-framing them in the worst possible light, into something I didn't even say. I'm genuinely confused. Where did I do this? If you are referring to this point I made... Also, let's remind ourselves that the hypothetical situation is a mother who wants to keep her child and needs help raising it, and a father who wants to steal that child from the mother and abandon it to the state, i… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/13 06:13 PM |
| 0 | Survey of 101 divorce lawyers show the #1 reason for divorce is boredom, 7 out of 10 divorces initiated by womenWow. That's the inference, huh? Or is it an inference one could make, due to one being a sexist asshole? Remember when I said this? So what if more women initiate divorce? I could use that to support the notion that "men are bad communicators," or "men take women for granted, or "men just want a maid and not a wife" - but I wouldn't because that's fucking sexist. Still applies. I'm starting to wonder if you even realize how full of shit you are. And I can hardly believe you just explained to me … | /r/MensRights | 20/06/13 03:58 PM |
| 5 | Survey of 101 divorce lawyers show the #1 reason for divorce is boredom, 7 out of 10 divorces initiated by womenOh my god. You are seriously doubling down on this? No, it's not racist to say "most of the violent crimes committed in my city are by black people" if it's reasonably provable through statistical measures. You have no statistics whatsoever to support that "women want a wedding, not a marriage." That is an entirely nebulous and opinion-based claim. So what if more women initiate divorce? I could use that to support the notion that "men are bad communicators," or "men take women for granted, or "… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/13 03:36 AM |
| 2 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.You. Are. Uh. May. Zing. <3 | /r/MensRights | 20/06/13 02:40 AM |
| 6 | Survey of 101 divorce lawyers show the #1 reason for divorce is boredom, 7 out of 10 divorces initiated by women"Guys just want a hot girl, they don't care about personality." It may be true in some cases, but it's still incredibly insulting to suggest that it's universally or even just generally true. Do you really not understand that? | /r/MensRights | 20/06/13 02:17 AM |
| 0 | Owning Your Shit: Okay, I really wasn't interested in doing this, but... | Karen (GirlWritesWhat) talks about The Wooly Bumblbee AVFM drama on her blog.You're slipping. It's very fun to watch. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/13 08:37 PM |
| 1 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.If we can't agree that "wanton ignorance" is an insult, we won't agree on anything. This from the guy that was screaming "AD HOMINEM!!" before, too. Nope, didn't move the goalposts. Merely reminded me of you of my previous comment, which you responded to with a long-winded, special MRA version of historical events, without addressing any of my actual points. And you still haven't, not really. Your argument for feminist hypocrisy is getting thinner and thinner. You do realize that women already s… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/13 08:09 PM |
| 1 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.LOL, yeah, I posted from my phone so I guess the link was wonky. I can't preempt your wanton ignorance by explaining it all. LOL again. This means literally nothing - just an excuse to be insulting, without having to actually engage in debate. Once again, I said: I'm not sure how being drafted necessarily relates to having the right to vote, as much more happens in this country than merely going to war And I stand by that. You haven't made an argument for why being eligible for the draft should … | /r/MensRights | 18/06/13 06:23 PM |
| 1 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Do you have sources for any of that? The only one I can find is from a men's "activism" website, and it says it happened in England, not in the US. There is also no mention of feminism. http://news.mensactivism.org/node/1724 *Edit to add, it's based on an article from the Daily Mail, no less. Regardless of the veracity of your version of events, that all happened almost 100 years ago. Everything I said above still stands; you haven't disputed any of it. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/13 04:45 PM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.I don't believe I was acting like an ass, but I'm sorry you feel that I was. Also, I think pretty much everyone finds tone important. That, along with body language, makes up something like 90% of what we receive from what others are saying. And unfortunately, as we often see on reddit, emoticons can be plenty sarcastic. Especially in this instance, where it came after an angry/frustrated sentiment. But thanks for clearing up the misunderstanding. What do you view as my straw man argument? I'm a… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 10:25 PM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Meanwhile, if the same mother instead chooses to keep the child, she can then make paternity claims against the father, and the father does not have the option of dropping the child at these locations, without the mother's consent. Do have a source proving this, in the face of the information and links I provided? Also, let's remind ourselves that the hypothetical situation is a mother who wants to keep her child and needs help raising it, and a father who wants to steal that child from the moth… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 09:18 PM |
| 1 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Thought you might invoke Safe Haven. I'm going to ignore the long-winded analogy that followed and just point out to you that under Safe Haven laws, anyone can drop off an infant. Not just the mother. In the majority of states, anonymity is preserved, and no questions are asked. The only restriction is the infant's age. Got any valid examples of ways that mothers can legally abandon their infants where fathers cannot? *Edit: link to the wikipedia page, which is non-gender specific when discussin… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 06:19 PM |
| 0 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."A boy shot himself to death, and you assume the boy is deranged and the girl is an innocent victim. You are putting words in my mouth, yet again. And it seems like you aren't going to stop anytime soon, so...meh. I see that in your desire to paint me as a villain, you will take any opportunity to twist what I say in a negative light, so here's my attempt at clearing the air. I would call a teenage girl who shot herself to death for essentially no reason unbalanced and an incredibly poor decision… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 06:10 PM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.You are free to stop responding to my "personal attacks" any time. Hey, wait a minute, you also said you wanted to be done - NOW YOU'RE HARRASSING ME!!! | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 06:02 PM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.LOL. Interpreted by whom, exactly? I am aware by this point that you enjoy twisting other's words and intentions to make yourself into a victim, as opposed to having to actually engage in debate, but unfortunately I'm not buying it. Lesson learned, hopefully - do not provoke debate opponents into responding, then invoke a victimizing word like "harassment" when they do. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 05:47 PM |
| 1 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.If you're determined to feel attacked, then sure. I guess that's what this entire sub is about, after all... | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 04:23 PM |
| 5 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Double sigh. This is really what you come back with? There was nothing for me to point out specifically because NONE of it was ad hominem. You attributed divergent opinions to the opinion-holders being "uninformed," which isn't sound, which I pointed out. You utterly mischaracterized my views, which I corrected you on. Now you're claiming that I attacked you in a manner that was off-topic, which I did not, though you are welcome to point out where you think I did. Can we be done now please? | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 02:06 AM |
| 1 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Ooooh, our minds are twisted!!! Cue melodramatic villain music Yeesh, you guys are so damn pissed off you can't see straight, aren't you? Demonizing your supposed enemy on false pretenses is so extremely counterproductive to your cause - I wish I could make you all see that somehow. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 02:00 AM |
| 3 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.All was on topic, and nowhere did I attack you. Do you feel attacked, somehow? | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 01:46 AM |
| 5 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Sigh. You consider yourself "informed" when what you really are is "opinionated." There is a difference, and there is also a difference between "traditional" gender roles and "natural" gender roles. "Traditional" gender roles are socialized - y'know, Dad should be the distant breadwinner, Mom should be the active nuturer. As I and other feminists would call them, bullshit. I think men are every bit as capable of being amazing parents. More of them tend to desert their children than do women, whi… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 01:18 AM |
| 4 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Right, because it's feminists who have been fighting to keep women out of combat roles, against the wishes of men. Oh wait... I'm not sure how being drafted necessarily relates to having the right to vote, as much more happens in this country than merely going to war, but I think that any feminist in favor of the draft would be in favor of women being drafted alongside men. Feminists against women being drafted would likely be against the draft wholesale. Just my anecdotal 2 cents. Do you think … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 01:08 AM |
| 2 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Um. What? I'm sorry, your rant seems entirely unrelated to what I wrote. Having to pay for children they fathered - in other words, providing for their children, as a parent must - was described as "slavery." I don't believe it is, nor would I ever call it that. Their words, not mine. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 12:46 AM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.No matter what her decision, she must accept responsibility for the unwanted pregnancy, as it occurs within her body. Are you forgetting that the biological roles of men and women in creating children are not identical? | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 12:44 AM |
| 5 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.It is propaganda, and it does make childcare and domestic work out to be a challenge for men Okay then, making this a little more explicit: why do you interpret this poster as saying childcare and domestic work is a challenge for men (which obviously suggests that you're insulted, seeing as you're complaining about it)? I don't view the original poster as saying that manual labor is a challenge for women, at all. *Edit to thank you for editing your post to make it much less rude. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 12:30 AM |
| 0 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Men do not need a propaganda campaign to entice them to become fathers, they are actually blocked from those roles. Really? MRAs are complaining in this same thread about how fatherhood is "slavery" and how unfair it is that men can't legally abandon their children, as women supposedly can. Y'all need a PR department. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 12:10 AM |
| 6 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.The original Westinghouse Poster was meant as a positive, inspiring message, not an insult. So why do you take this version an insult to men? Perhaps because you view the tasks depicted as lesser than that of a factory worker? | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 12:07 AM |
| 8 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.You're assuming it's a "prod against deadbeat dads" because you want to demonize feminists. Your typical non-MRA person would see this poster and say, "Oh look, feminists think neither gender should be forced to conform to traditional gender roles. That's nice! Egalitarian even." It's a positive message, dude. Drop the silly conspiracy theory. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/13 12:06 AM |
| 1 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Demanding the right to abandon children, in the spirit of egalitarianism. MRAs, classy as always. *Edit to add that this source does not distinguish between mothers and fathers when discussing child abandonment from a legal perspective. And mothers can owe child support just as fathers can, if they do not have primary custody. In which hypothetical situations are you arguing that mothers can legally abdicate responsibility where fathers cannot? | /r/MensRights | 16/06/13 11:56 PM |
| 3 | "He Can Do It" - A great picture I ran across earlier this year for Father's Day.Then, when you have sex while wearing a condom, you accept that there is a risk of unwanted pregnancy and thus accept responsibility for that unwanted pregnancy, should it occur. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/13 11:29 PM |
| 0 | AMR has effectively censored this post, effectively censored us from participating, and pushed their own comment to #1 on our forum. It's the #1 link in their forum. I thought reddit didn't allow brigades.Might want to take screenshots in future. For all anyone knows, you're lying. Certainly you're lying about me having insulted anyone. And I'm a she, btw, despite your interesting assumption. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/13 10:42 PM |
| 0 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."It must be hard to be so mangry all the time. Maybe they all need naps? | /r/MensRights | 15/06/13 07:59 PM |
| 1 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."You say I apparently "insulted" the boy by not giving him the benefit of the doubt, which is a huge stretch and a desperate attempt at painting me as a man-hater. Well, you didn't give the girl the benefit of the doubt, did you? Your first assumption is that she was lying, or that despite getting the police involved, she wanted those sexual texts ("Det Sgt Lee Neiles, of Kent Police, told the inquest: 'She wanted them to stop'"), and thought the worst of her without any facts to back it up. In y… | /r/MensRights | 15/06/13 07:31 PM |
| 3 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."you insulted a boy who committed suicide Seeeee...this is the exact problem here. I did what now? When did that happen, exactly? I get that you want to be angry and you want to feel as if your gender is being victimized. But that desire is causing you to demonize me, a person you see as your opponent, on false pretenses. You claimed that people you do not know either thought or said the boy "deserved to die," which is clearly not the case. It's out of hand and is, in fact, hysterical - though I'… | /r/MensRights | 15/06/13 12:02 AM |
| -2 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."LOL. Calm down dude, hysterical doesn't look good on you. I have no desire to hide my beliefs, or how I found this thread. Nice try at the "gotcha" moment though. Though I read and post in AMR, and enjoy glimpses into the twisted world of this subreddit, it does not belong to me and thus is not "mine." You abruptly changed the subject to the apparently objectionable fact of my presence here when you couldn't counter my argument; don't think I didn't notice that. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/13 11:47 PM |
| -6 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."I don't know what you mean by "my" forum, but the rules are different in different subreddits. File that one under "things I shouldn't have to explain." | /r/MensRights | 14/06/13 11:34 PM |
| -5 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."If you're that upset about a valid criticism of your misguided thinking, you might want to petition the mods for a rule change. Until then, you're gonna get called on your shit. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/13 10:23 PM |
| -5 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."You're making a lot of really melodramatic leaps there. In every direction. To claim that anyone feels that boy deserved to die is preposterous and removes any erases any credibility you have in your arguments. Defending the girl against those who would inexplicably attack her =/= "That boy deserved to die!" Hope you can grasp at least that much common sense. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/13 10:10 PM |
| -5 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."...Really. All those people feel that the boy deserved to die? Teenagers both male and female tend to have bad judgment. We should look out for them because they are human, not because of their gender specifically. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/13 09:21 PM |
| -7 | [r/worldnews]: "A schoolboy shot himself hours after police visited his family home to question him about sexual texts he sent to a girl, an inquest heard."So, I guess because one unbalanced boy with incredibly poor decision-making skills shot himself after being disciplined for unwanted sexual advances, we should never discipline children for making unwanted sexual advances...? This reminds me of The Breakfast Club - when Anthony Michael Hall's character was planning to shoot himself after getting one bad grade in one class, due to tons of pressure to be perfect from his parents, or himself, or whoever else. He blew something that really isn't a h… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/13 08:43 PM |
| -1 | "Are British men having a crisis of masculinity?" An absolutely fantastic article that identifies so much wrong in the UK right now.You did not say I had no right to my opinion in so many words, no. But every other aspect of your communication - condescension, contempt, all but calling me insane, and assuming in the first place that whatever blowback OP was experiencing MUST be due to him hitting a nerve and the ensuing butthurtitude from that, rather than a simple rejection of his overly emotional, hyperbolic and self-victimizing arguments - reinforces that belief on your part. I do feel for anyone who is incapable of a bas… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/13 06:28 AM |
| -1 | "Are British men having a crisis of masculinity?" An absolutely fantastic article that identifies so much wrong in the UK right now.Oh, honey. I really do feel for you, however much you might reject my basic right to a differing opinion. I fully expect you will continue to mischaracterize others' feelings and motives from a false belief in your own superiority, and still, I feel for you. You are a huge part of what is so toxic and sad about this "movement." Again, best of luck. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/13 05:55 AM |
| 1 | "Are British men having a crisis of masculinity?" An absolutely fantastic article that identifies so much wrong in the UK right now.You are an unfortunate combination of utterly condescending and entirely lacking in self awareness. Best of luck out there. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/13 05:01 AM |
| -1 | "Are British men having a crisis of masculinity?" An absolutely fantastic article that identifies so much wrong in the UK right now.Presented information? I think you mean silly ranting. There's nothing to debunk, really - and debate on the "merits" grants legitimacy to a bitter, illogical series of statements that is undeserved. You really are a funny one :) | /r/MensRights | 25/05/13 10:40 PM |
| 0 | "Are British men having a crisis of masculinity?" An absolutely fantastic article that identifies so much wrong in the UK right now.LOL! How charmingly civil of you. His post in and of itself is a lot of self-victimizing nonsense, which I at least find amusing; it's the sincere belief in that nonsense that you all seem to share which is rather disturbing, and worthy of serious discussion. But you clearly derive your personal worth from insulting strangers on the internet, and I will leave you to it. Not my style of conversation. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/13 07:20 PM |
| 2 | "Are British men having a crisis of masculinity?" An absolutely fantastic article that identifies so much wrong in the UK right now.Less that he hit a nerve, more that he's making an whiny ass of himself and we think it's pretty amusing. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/13 04:07 AM |
| 11 | Posted on someone I knows FB page. I see shit like this allllll the time.I think you missed the "go about my day" part. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/13 03:08 AM |
| 8 | Posted on someone I knows FB page. I see shit like this allllll the time.It is bigotry to assume that something is or is not worth reading primarily based on the gender or race of the person who wrote it. This is the extremely simple concept that was being communicated to you, which you refused to pick up on. Is it still somehow not clear to you? | /r/MensRights | 23/05/13 03:00 AM |
| 1 | Tired. So fucking tired.You're awesome. Just thought I'd let you know :) | /r/MensRights | 19/05/13 08:46 PM |
| 0 | Female Motorist blocks roads and claims she's being attacked - [1:46]Isn't it also the UK where there is an insanely low rate of rape cases being brought to court, let alone resulting in a conviction? Isn't that a pretty major strike against the his-word-against-hers-so-he's-gonna-lose argument? | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 08:21 PM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems heret's been proved that your assertion was a lie - you don't have "all those MRAs that said women's suffrage should never have happened." You have MRAs who have criticized women's voting behavior. It was hyperbole, a common rhetorical tactic. I see that you're hung up on that one sentence, so much so that you're ignoring the substance of the actual debate that followed, so I sincerely apologize for my moment of hyperbole, and I respect the rights of those who called me out on my overstatement to ha… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 01:38 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereYeah, I missed it the first time you put "overall gist" in quotes. Good reading comprehension, I promise, but it's been a long day. If you mean you begrudgingly accepted after a while, then sure, but at least in one post afterwards still characterised my dismissal of your claim as "denial", as if I was being unreasonable or unfair. I don't believe I ever posed it as a central tenant of the MRM, nor did I ever believe it to be done. If my language suggested otherwise, however, I'm sorry I wasn't … | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 01:24 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereThanks for providing examples, that's helpful. IMO they could well be referring largely to the subreddits and not to the movements at large, which - while fairly well-represented by the subreddits - are not wholly contained by them. But, as you concede, there is a ton of crossover between the two. Anyone can post in MR, it's true, but I think you'll agree that Demonspawn's worldview is far more in line with MR than your average SRS or r/feminism member. Which is why he posts, and is upvoted, ver… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 01:17 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereI truly did misspeak, and immediately acknowledged it when it was brought to my attention. I even appreciate you bringing it up and giving me the chance to clarify, however ungracious you insist on being now. Recognize a tiny olive branch when you see one. And don't lose your humanity in the quest to be right at all costs. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:47 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereThanks for the unneeded advice! My reiteration did exactly zero harm. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:42 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereYou provided me with another who said fuck the MRM and said he would be sticking to his own community now, Red Pill. He didn't say "fuck the MRM" and he still frequently posts in r/mensrights. (Screw you in advance, linkbot.) *Edit: referring specifically to Demonspawn, to avoid any confusion. "The overall gist of the MRA philosophy" yes you did. I clarified that I misspoke. Be a gracious human being and accept that, or don't. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:40 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereI asked you questions that reflect how I perceive your stance on single issue voting, and how many others would perceive it as well. You criticize women's voting habits partially on the basis that some of them are single issue voters, but of course there are plenty of non-female single issue voters out there as well, and you don't mention them. It's also possible that women simply have more reason to be single issue voters, as our rights are more immediately in danger - and that would be the fau… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:37 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereHey dude, there's truly no need to trash on my reading comprehension - which has always been extremely high, as long as we're on the subject - and make this personal. I don't believe I have taken my rhetorical tone to that place, but if I have, I apologize and I regret it. I provided you with multiple examples of MRAs saying women's suffrage is a bad thing, which is what I was originally tasked to do. I have conceded that it is not a central tenant of the MRM - which I was never arguing, but tho… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:24 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereThat's not a response. I asked you a question. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:21 AM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereThere's huge crossover between MRM folks and Red Pill. Do you deny that as well? Of course I noticed it isn't MR - doesn't mean it isn't a valid example. Demonspawn is a frequent poster in r/mensrights and I'm sure those other guys are too. I know you're desperate to worm out of acknowledging that there might be substance to my point, but really. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:19 AM |
| 0 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereHope you don't miss this, I just posted it in response to you: a charming discussion thread lovely standout from the same thread I suppose you'll say that one man's opinion does not justify my claim - never mind the upvotes and the supportive language of other misters, of course | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:09 AM |
| 0 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereMore from the lovely demonspawn. Plenty others chiming in with what is far from disagreement: a charming discussion thread lovely standout from the same thread I suppose you'll say that one man's opinion does not justify my claim - never mind the upvotes and the supportive language of other misters, of course | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:06 AM |
| -1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereYou act as if you've somehow already demonstrated this 1st claim. Maybe stick to one at a time. So you do deny that the MRM is well-documented as hostile to women? | /r/MensRights | 07/05/13 12:01 AM |
| 0 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereWhat I meant was the overall gist of the anti-female vote stance within the MRM. I stated that poorly and I understand how you could have mistaken that as meaning "the overall gist of the MRM in general." Got an actual link? It was one that I sent but you apparently missed. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 11:56 PM |
| -1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereI provided you linked examples of MRAs complaining about women's suffrage and their voting habits. Yet that's somehow invalid to you. It may not be a widely-held belief within the movement, but it is yet another example of the "blame feminists/women (because we don't know the difference) for all our problems" mentality rampant within this sub, which can be seen multiple times on the front page of MR on any given day. The MRM's blatant hostility towards women is incredibly well-documented. Do you… | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 11:51 PM |
| 0 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereAnd as for the frequent-poster MRA windbag complaining about how he gets called a misogynist when he says women's suffrage shouldn't have happened? Got a thin excuse for that one too? | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 11:40 PM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems here...Did you not see all the links I provided in this comment, which was in direct response to you? Edit: more in my comment here. The overall gist of the MRA philosophy seems to be: when men vote out of self-interest it's natural and good, even if their choices screw women over, but when women do it it's wrong, and sexist against men. Just about as fair and balanced as Fox News. *2nd edit to format annoyingly long links. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 10:50 PM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereAre you suggesting that only women are single-issue voters? Or is anyone who votes based primarily or even partially on one issue that directly affects their lives "doing it wrong," in your eyes? *Edit to provide an example: opponents of gun control are another classic example of "single issue voters." They are heavily male and conservative. Does this mean that the gun lobby, conservatives, and men in general are not living up to the responsibility of voting wisely? Or are the men exempt from cr… | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 10:39 PM |
| 1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereKinderdemon didn't claim that. I did. You don't even have to find MRAs who have said that. Some of them obviously believe it, given their commentary on how women have "abused" their right to vote somehow and things have been worse off for men ever since women started voting. Also, the outright complaints that MRAs who say women's suffrage shouldn't have happened are labeled misogynistic - for some mysterious reason! - point directly to that belief. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/13 10:35 PM |
| 2 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereYour argument actually is an argument in favor of taking the vote away from us, not because we can't do better, but because you assume that no woman ever will. No. Just...no. "Do better"? I never accepted the premise that women need to "do better" somehow, with our "anti-male" voting. How on earth do we need to "do better?" Maybe you can explain it to me. The prevailing logic here seems to be that because A) women got the vote, and B) men are at a greater political/societal disadvantage since th… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/13 03:14 AM |
| 2 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems herePresentation of evidence to what end, one might ask. It's not hard to connect the dots. The point is that suffrage, and women voting, was somehow a bad thing for men. It's a ridiculous argument. Women are able to vote now because we are people, too, and that's how it should be. Full fucking stop. It's like having a discussion about how ending slavery was bad for white people - you're not going to get very far in reasonable company. Hope you can see the parallel there. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/13 04:56 PM |
| -1 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereAlso: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11ia37/e_belfort_bax_on_female_suffrage_1904/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/e2msq/vintage_antisuffrage_ads_they_knew_what_would/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/fja72/womens_suffrage_over_time/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15i95p/the_fine_line_between_progressive_and_puritan_in/ Just search "suffrage" within r/mensrights, really. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/13 10:31 PM |
| 2 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereSource? Several in my comment here. The MRM has never been in a position to legislate, so it doesn't mean much to say that they've never passed legislation that discriminates against women. It's not a valid bragging point. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/13 10:08 PM |
| 4 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereMisrepresentation. No, sorry. womans suffrage wasnt really about general equality. ...and that's a pretty dumb and pointless argument, isn't it? | /r/MensRights | 01/05/13 05:22 PM |
| 10 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems heremensrights also doesn't oppose women's equal rights Except for all those MRAs that have said women's suffrage should never have happened, because women voting makes everything worse. has never actually created legislation that discriminates against them. That's pretty meaningless because the MRM has never been in a position to legislate. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/13 05:13 PM |
| 6 | Is r/creepypms a safe place to slut shame men for free karma? Really bothering me.Honestly, this sounds like you're saying "Yeah, but the difference is that I'm right." I guess I should have been clearer. When I said that "women are an historically, globally oppressed group" I meant specifically at the hands of men, to their detriment and to men's gain. Is that any clearer? I think it's a pretty reasonable and objectively supportable position that, although men too are oppressed all over the world, women are more often oppressed on the basis of their gender, which results in … | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 09:48 PM |
| 7 | Is r/creepypms a safe place to slut shame men for free karma? Really bothering me.You saying things like "They just need to stop being creepy!" or "well, if they don't want to be called creeps then they shouldn't have been creepy", clearly demonstrates that you don't understand the harm in the word, where the behaviors you label as "creepy" come from or how your misrepresentations, and lack of understanding, of their actions is a problem. I didn't say any of that. Are you confused about who you are talking to? There are countless posts on r/creepypms that show a deep sense of… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 06:46 PM |
| 7 | Is r/creepypms a safe place to slut shame men for free karma? Really bothering me.Hi! Thanks for your civility. Can only one be a problem or do we have to order problems from most serious to least serious and address them like that? This is a good point and I appreciate it. This seems like something people can and do say about Feminism to attempt to shut a conversation down. Right, but the difference there is that women are an historically, globally oppressed group and men are not. It's also interesting to note your syntax excludes men from being "real victims of patriarchy."… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 06:35 PM |
| 8 | Is r/creepypms a safe place to slut shame men for free karma? Really bothering me.What you're saying here would be something similar to "Why is calling niggers "niggers" a problem? all they have to do is stop being niggers!" The fact that you would compare this, in all seriousness, to the plight of creeps being called creeps, shows that you in fact are the one who doesn't get it. And probably never will. Waste of my time. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 06:23 PM |
| 10 | Is r/creepypms a safe place to slut shame men for free karma? Really bothering me.Why, because calling a creepy guy a creep is some kind of serious problem? Like the ACTUAL FACT of women being discriminated against when seeking positions of power in our society? It boggles my mind how some men so desperately want to paint themselves as victims, because they're jealous of the attention that real victims of the patriarchy get, or something? I honestly don't understand it. I told a female friend that being called creepy is so prevalent that, if it were a death penalty offense, e… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 04:53 AM |
| 1 | can I get some links on the patriarchy?Check out the comment (currently) above you. Patriarchy has a simple definition, and is a provable phenomenon. (in case it moves) | /r/MensRights | 22/04/13 02:30 AM |
| 3 | "Are you a woman who is worried about the idea of men sexually watching you shower? We totally understand. Are you a man who is worried about the idea of men sexually watching you shower? WOW GROW THEThe distinction here seems to be a cultural one rather than of the basic fact of someone's sexual preference, which can be informed by culture but ultimately isn't determined by it - if you believe, as I do, that homosexuality isn't a choice. As a woman, I'd be far more comfortable showering with a lesbian than with a man. Perhaps that's because there is a deep culturally embedded message that men can't control themselves around women, will engage in some immature behavior, or at the very least … | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 12:56 AM |
| 1 | "Are you a woman who is worried about the idea of men sexually watching you shower? We totally understand. Are you a man who is worried about the idea of men sexually watching you shower? WOW GROW THEAre you suggesting that the woman is going to exploit or seduce the man if they share a shower together, for some devious purpose, and that's why we separate the sexes? I'm sorry, I genuinely don't understand. Maybe someone else can help me. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 12:42 AM |
| 5 | CNN: "To stem violence against women, men must step up ... globally, at least one in three women and girls are beaten or sexually abused in their lifetimes, usually at the hands of men." Sigh.There is nothing positive about this unnecessary whine-fest. You're all bitching about perceived wrongs instead of standing up in solidarity with people who would welcome your viewpoint if it wasn't couched in anger and bitterness. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/13 04:15 AM |
| -13 | Is there a site which focuses on men's issues but is friendly toward feminism?LOL! If I thought it was worth refuting you, I would, but it's 100% not. Emotional arguments, just like self-interest, are shared by all of humanity. Also, you're a dumbass. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/13 02:42 AM |
| -13 | Is there a site which focuses on men's issues but is friendly toward feminism?It's too bad your ass gets kissed so hard considering you are so very full of shit. And a condescending asshole to boot! You give bigoted people an excuse to be bigoted, while allowing them to continue living in denial about being bigoted. I feel a lot better about the minimal amount I have contributed to humanity knowing that it has hopefully cancelled out some of your rancid awfulness. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/13 02:16 AM |
| 5 | "The LGBT struggle is a feminist one" thread in r/lgbt. WTF is with this logic?initially feminism challenged the traditional family structure, and that was threatening to mainsteam conservative-minded people. same is now true for lgbts. feminism fought against women's status as second class citizens, and lgbts also know what it's like to be treated differently under the law, and be discriminated against in ways that are subtler and more insidious within our culture. so, empathy and an innate understanding of the struggle they face. there's also the obvious: that many lgbts… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/13 02:01 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter